Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:27:46 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "Shaun T. Erickson" <ste@ste-land.com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Quick newbie portupgrade question.
Message-ID:  <20040227082745.GA15364@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <403EE178.20401@ste-land.com>
References:  <403EDBEB.4070904@ste-land.com> <403EDE57.3050004@daleco.biz> <403EE178.20401@ste-land.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:19:36AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
>=20
> >Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> >
> >>I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are=
=20
> >>packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with=20
> >>packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with=20
> >>ports, so that all are ports after it's run?
> >
> >Check out the -P and -PP CLI switches
> >to portupgrade(1).....
>=20
> If I read them correctly, I cannot have packages replaced with packages,=
=20
> and ports with ports. That is, unless I can figure out which are which,=
=20
> ahead of time, and select the right switches for the right things. Is=20
> there an easy way to determine which are which?

No, see my response.

Kris

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAPv+BWry0BWjoQKURAmcPAKDi7eUzKji+yLY09UXtFDzUazQT6QCfQ7KW
2wHN9OwYt/b08RI9iOKJoBs=
=Z+Tx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040227082745.GA15364>