Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:06:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel KMS: a memory problem Message-ID: <1339614412996-5718122.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1unf3yHd=aAugpGeB=b42ZB5gnP6bjTK9KpMmfs4gJCbQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FD86E13.6090202@bally-wulff.de> <20120613112601.GS2337@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <CAN6yY1unf3yHd=aAugpGeB=b42ZB5gnP6bjTK9KpMmfs4gJCbQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
32 bit systems being faster (for Windows desktop usually!) than 64 was quite a bit time ago. Also, even then 64 bit ones were faster where it could be utilised. Umm... Please do not be offended, but all basics are here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#Pros_and_cons -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Intel-KMS-a-memory-problem-tp5718027p5718122.html Sent from the freebsd-x11 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1339614412996-5718122.post>