From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 10 17:54:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF57316A4CE; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75C43D39; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6AHsQ8k077468; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6AHsPKt004651; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6AHsPYQ004650; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:54:25 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040710175425.GA4636@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200407101552.i6AFqQB7030330@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040710174415.GA35996@VARK.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040710174415.GA35996@VARK.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen isinf.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:54:27 -0000 On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:44:15AM -0700, David Schultz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2004, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > marcel 2004-07-10 15:52:26 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc/gen isinf.c > > Log: > > Unbreak alpha: On alpha a long double is the same as a double and > > consequently the exponent is only 11 bits. Testing whether the > > exponent equals 32767 in that case only effects to compiler warnings > > and thus build breakage. > > Thanks. Even though the exponent range is the same for both the > IEEE extended and quad ``long double'' formats and is probably > never going to change, I should probably add some macros for these > constants. That's definitely a cleaner way to deal with alpha being an exception. Especially if alpha is not going to change in this respect. I leave it all up to you... :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net