Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:20:03 +0200
From:      Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
To:        RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor)
Message-ID:  <20101122192003.46e16bea@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101122131905.318b590c@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <4CE7EC0D.9000203@a1poweruser.com> <4CE969B6.90900@kc8onw.net> <AANLkTik7wfhm8hp-Kwfu8HerqYftiYXTCwT6Q83t7Hmv@mail.gmail.com> <201011211909.23708.beech@akherb.com> <20101122052649.GA61979@comcast.net> <4CEA0738.3060701@unfs.us> <20101122072257.GF48679@comcast.net> <20101122131905.318b590c@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/ZUK5PLw8sfj/C7EyQ/a72bR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:19:05 +0000
RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:22:57 -0800
> Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote:
> > >
> > >    Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer
> > > (meaning
> > >they only have a select few number of ports to maintain and are
> > >only trying to contribute/participate) knows that maybe this issue
> > >is due to the porter's handbook. Specifically
> > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submittin=
g.html
> > >which blatantly states that all submissions whether they are new OR
> > >updates be submitted in shar format. Maybe the commiters should
> > >bring this up and have a few less to deal with..? Just a
> > >suggestion.
> >=20
> > That page doesn't say what you think it says. =20
> >=20
> > Its context is the creation of a new port.  It doesn't say anything
> > about updating an existing port.
>=20
> Actually it does discuss the wording of the synopsis for both new and
> updated ports which gives the impression that that that section covers
> both.=20
>=20
> Furthermore  the update chapter is at the opposite end of the
> index under the single misleading word  "Upgrading".  There's no
> mention of "submitting" which is what people will be looking for.=20
>=20
> IMO chapter 10 should either be 3.7 or be merged into 3.6. If anything
> deserves to be under "Quick Porting" it's this.
>=20
>=20
> > Perhaps the problem is that some people never read the *rest* of the
> > handbook? =20
>=20
> The trouble is that even when people do read handbooks from beginning
> to end there are always sections that that they are likely to skip
> until they need them, and this is one of them.

Patches with your proposed changes please. Thanks.

--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B

--Sig_/ZUK5PLw8sfj/C7EyQ/a72bR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iEUEARECAAYFAkzqpkQACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUmkwCgrwXRtJ0jhBZfKp269/cY6knZ
r4YAmI9ZHFLd84Ou5PrqABU43NXeb74=
=fZvi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/ZUK5PLw8sfj/C7EyQ/a72bR--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101122192003.46e16bea>