From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 1 09:45:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB07106564A; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552698FC0A; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2650508BB; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.41] (zeus.webrz.net [10.10.10.41]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B350A508AE; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 11:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F7823C5.8090709@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:45:41 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4F781F0F.5020305@webrz.net> <4F782346.1010901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F782346.1010901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PICO port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:45:42 -0000 Hi Matt, Thanks, I guess I should take more attention on these critical changes K-) regards, Jos Chrispijn Matthew Seaman: > On 01/04/2012 10:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: >> I have been out of FreeBSD some time, but when installing BSD9 I can't >> locate pico anymore. What I did is: >> - portsnap fetch >> - portsnap extract >> - portsnap update >> >> but pico seems to be completely gone? >> Who can tell me what I oversee here? > Use editors/pico-alpine instead. > > MOVED says: > > editors/pico|editors/pico-alpine|2008-09-01|No further development for > pine, alpine has more features and is config-compatible > > Essentially the Pine project got reorganised, re-released under new > licensing terms and renamed to Alpine. Hence the name change of the > pico port. > > Cheers, > > Matthew >