From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:55:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67111065696 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:55:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491B8FC25 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A73E41C6FC; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:55:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOWo5aE6AG3x; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 974AA41C6F2; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FA34448F3; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:51:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Frank Razenberg In-Reply-To: <4C7FA623.2010802@zzattack.org> Message-ID: <20100902134953.C31898@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <4C7E8E7C.7090708@zzattack.org> <4C7F8551.6020901@zzattack.org> <4C7FA623.2010802@zzattack.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: Re: duplicate epair ipv6 addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:55:08 -0000 On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Frank Razenberg wrote: Hey, > base > nfe0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > options=80008 > ether 00:22:15:bb:6d:6f > inet 10.31.45.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.31.45.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > nd6 options=3 > bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether de:3b:7a:d8:3a:98 > id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 > maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200 > root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 > member: epair2a flags=143 > ifmaxaddr 0 port 6 priority 128 path cost 2000 > member: epair1a flags=143 > ifmaxaddr 0 port 5 priority 128 path cost 2000 > member: epair0a flags=143 > ifmaxaddr 0 port 4 priority 128 path cost 2000 > member: nfe0 flags=143 > ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 55 > epair0a: flags=8943 metric 0 > mtu 1500 > ether 02:9a:c6:00:04:0a > epair1a: flags=8943 metric 0 > mtu 1500 > ether 02:da:d1:00:05:0a > epair2a: flags=8943 metric 0 > mtu 1500 > ether 02:ea:c6:00:06:0a What makes me wonder is why the ether addresses of all three "a" epair ends are non-default? Do you know what changed them? Did you do do avoid collisions with possibly other epairs bridged to a 2nd machine over nfe0? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.