From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jul 8 11:23:09 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA01712 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 11:23:09 -0700 Received: from clinet.fi (root@clinet.fi [193.64.6.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA01702 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 11:23:07 -0700 Received: from katiska.clinet.fi (root@katiska.clinet.fi [193.64.6.3]) by clinet.fi (8.6.10/8.6.4) with ESMTP id VAA26498; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 21:23:01 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu Received: (hsu@localhost) by katiska.clinet.fi (8.6.11/8.6.4) id VAA18908; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 21:23:00 +0300 Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 21:23:00 +0300 Message-Id: <199507081823.VAA18908@katiska.clinet.fi> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: hsu@clinet.fi, freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: kern/600: PPP does not pay attention to IPTOS_LOWDELAY In-Reply-To: <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199507080000.RAA29882@freefall.cdrom.com> <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de> Organization: Clinet Ltd, Espoo, Finland Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J Wunsch writes: > > + /* > > + * Most high-priority services set IPTOS_LOWDELAY. This is a much more > > + * generic mechanism than specific port numbers. This same mechanism > > + * is used by slip. > > + */ > > + if (ip->ip_tos & IPTOS_LOWDELAY) > > + ifq = &sc->sc_fastq; > > + > > About to commit it. Btw., the ``interactive'' hack has been removed > from if_sl.c in 4.4BSD. Is this a good or a bad thing? I haven't got a slightest idea. > Who's actually setting IPTOS_LOWDELAY? rlogin, telnet, ftp (for its control port), some others (RSN). It seems that support for it has sneaked in without anyone noticing, I had been under impression that noone really uses it. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@clinet.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4375209 fax -4555276