From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 1 17:17:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034DF16A400; Mon, 1 May 2006 17:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from centrmmtao04.cox.net (centrmmtao04.cox.net [70.168.83.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0157C43D46; Mon, 1 May 2006 17:17:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by centrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060501171754.DRL14774.centrmmtao04.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 13:17:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 12:20:08 -0500 To: ahze@ahze.net References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200604301614.30077.andy@athame.co.uk> <200604301950.27364.andy@athame.co.uk> <44562619.3090403@freebsd.org> <44563C14.1050104@freebsd.org> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.54 (Linux, build 1745) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 17:17:57 -0000 On Mon, 01 May 2006 11:53:06 -0500, michael johnson wrote: > On 5/1/06, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> >> Jeremy Messenger schrieb: >> >> >> Also ... seriously, do you guys even check just what is depending on >> the >> >> things you're setting CONFLICTS with? I really was not expecting to >> see >> >> anybody pull a fam->gamin again so soon. >> > >> > We had over ten people that tested GNOME 2.14, but it just happened >> that >> > none of us have KDE installed. >> >> All that was needed to detect this particular issue ahead of time was a >> ports checkout and grep. >> >> > I fear that it might be end up that KDE and GNOME are in conflict for >> a bit while. > > > kdegraphics depends on xpdf and gnome depends on poppler. > and xpdf and poppler conflict. However, kdegraphics could > depend on poppler, it is a dropin replacement for xpdf. =) Okay, are kde@ going to test poppler and avahi, then change the dependencies? KDE is going to use them anyway in future version. Cheers, Mezz > I don't see why they should. >> >> -- >> ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org >> (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org >> \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org >> >> >> >> -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org