Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:38:33 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <sat@FreeBSD.org> To: "Alexander Leidinger" <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.linux-rpm.mk Message-ID: <cb5206420607310838h7187c289kdc80a8c8c311e9b9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060731121024.3d6478b4@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200607302234.k6UMYUuq018943@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060731121024.3d6478b4@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/31/06, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > Quoting Andrew Pantyukhin <sat@FreeBSD.org> (Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:34:30 +0000 (UTC)): > > > sat 2006-07-30 22:34:30 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > Mk bsd.linux-rpm.mk > > Log: > > - Only set default m_s_subdir if master_sites was undefined > > Would you please describe which problem this commit tries to solve > (perhaps as a forced commit)? Fedora has a rather unique MSS scheme (related to its versioning) and applying the scheme to another MS does not seem very practical. In practice, a more relevant default value might be attempted to be set after bsd.linux-rpm.mk. > I'm not sure if we have some ports which set MS but depend on the auto > assigning of MSS, but I would not be surprised if we have such ports. > Did you check for such ports? Sure. There are 29 USE_LINUX_RPM ports, only three set MS, two of them don't need MSS at all and the third one would rather MSS was not touched by linux-rpm.mk. I'm sorry I committed this without prior discussion, but I tried to make sure the change was not desctructive and as simple as it gets.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420607310838h7187c289kdc80a8c8c311e9b9>