Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Aug 1997 17:26:55 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), jbarrm@panix.com, sherwink@ix.netcom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: XFree86-3.3, FBSD-2.2.2 & ViRGE/VX 
Message-ID:  <199708040026.RAA01522@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 Aug 1997 15:03:09 PDT." <199708032203.PAA02444@phaeton.artisoft.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, it is true and this is and old problem also I think it surfaces
because some PC chisets incorrectly map the io address by truncating
the S3 ioaddress. The problem has been there since day one of S3 chipsets.

	Cheers,
	Amancio



>From The Desk Of Terry Lambert :
> > Some S3 boards uses the same i/o ports as sio3.  You shouldn't use both
> > sio3 and X these boards.  Some S3 boards crash at boot time when sio3
> > is probed.  You shouldn't configure sio3 if you have one of these boards
> > (even if you don't use X).
> 
> S3 boards?
> 
> Is this true?
> 
> I know there was a problem with Mach32 and Mach64 boards incorrectly
> listening to I/O's on some ports before being put into a mode where
> listening was mandatory (it's a bug in the chipset).
> 
> I didn't think S3 had the same problem... I run nothing but S3 cards,
> and I haven't seen the problem on any of my machines...
> 
> 
> 					Terry Lambert
> 					terry@lambert.org
> ---
> Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> or previous employers.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708040026.RAA01522>