From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 8:10:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003E237B442 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 8252014C2E; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:10:40 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Kirk McKusick Cc: Peter Wemm , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. References: <200110260006.f9Q05vQ05273@beastie.mckusick.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 26 Oct 2001 17:10:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200110260006.f9Q05vQ05273@beastie.mckusick.com> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kirk McKusick writes: > I vote for option (3), 64-bit time_t for all 64 bit architectures. > I would go along with option (4) provided that the change-over came > with FreeBSD 5.0 and it was not MFC'ed back to the 4.X series. FWIW, I add my vote to this option. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message