From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 20 20:44:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B90AD7FD0 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1870D7A for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:44:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ahkDB-000EkL-Qq; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:44:33 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:44:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Carmel Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: clamav problem Message-ID: <20160320204433.GJ35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <895F5CC6-9F5D-4A12-A8C3-E004F4157B4A@pozo.com> <20160320114402.GH35640@home.opsec.eu> <20160320154254.GI35640@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:44:32 -0000 Hi! > >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change > >that, as submitter of that bug. > > Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want > to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost). There are several instances of ticket systems, where security relevant problem reports are kept restricted. Cisco does it, redhat does it, so... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !