Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 Jun 1999 23:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RE: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ? 
Message-ID:  <199906060626.XAA17701@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <199906052344.TAA19843@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906052010540.53878-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <199906060057.UAA20103@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:<<On Sat, 5 Jun 1999 20:13:56 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> said:
:
:>> If they are spaced too far apart, it is possible for perfectly
:>> legitimate connections to get shot down as a result of external
:>> periodicities.  (Does somebody's router reset every day at 2:45?  If
:>> so, better hope no keepalives are scheduled for then!)
:
:> But remember that the idea is the keepalive would keep trying for a certain
:> amount of time, and this would be finely configureable.
:
:This wouldn't help the poor sod whose connection gets shot down every
:eight days while he's not there and doesn't know what hit him.

    If the poor sod hasn't touched his xterm for 8 days, he's either dead
    or he doesn't care if it goes away.

						-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906060626.XAA17701>