Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:08:38 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> To: rjackson@cs.csubak.edu Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Message-ID: <20010611150838X.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <3B25405D.2090209@cs.csubak.edu> References: <20010611172443.A18552@home.com> <3B25405D.2090209@cs.csubak.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Short answer: -stable builds fine. Long answer: It only builds fine if you don't use non-standard build flags like SHARED=symlinks, which some people appear to be using since they're reporting problems. On a completely stock -stable system as of yesterday, I can report: >>> elf make world started on Sun Jun 10 12:28:33 PDT 2001 >>> elf make world completed on Sun Jun 10 13:23:54 PDT 2001 >>> Kernel build for WINSTON started on Sun Jun 10 13:23:54 PDT 2001 >>> Kernel build for WINSTON completed on Sun Jun 10 13:30:25 PDT 2001 So both the world and the kernel build just fine if you don't try to do things your own way right now and if you have a stock -stable source tree without local modifications. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611150838X.jkh>