From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 22 07:57:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA01720 for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 1996 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bacchus.eng.umd.edu (bacchus.eng.umd.edu [129.2.94.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA01713 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 07:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cappuccino.eng.umd.edu (cappuccino.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.14]) by bacchus.eng.umd.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA07515 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 10:57:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: (chuckr@localhost) by cappuccino.eng.umd.edu (8.7.5/8.6.4) id KAA01655; Wed, 22 May 1996 10:57:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 10:57:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey X-Sender: chuckr@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu To: FreeBSD current Subject: editors Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This is about an easy editor, changing ee for pico. First, I want to say that I agree, anyone who is even slightly serious about software should never use pico. Still, watching other students in beginning C++ and Pascal classes using pico (because they CAN) when the teacher keeps on pushing emacs and vi makes me understand that people want an easily understandable editor, no matter what. That being the case, I have b'maked pico, and given it to Jordan. This is a chance to everyone to comment, and tell me that replacing ee with pico is wrong. If you don't want this to happen, now's your chance ... ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------