From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 16 01:00:59 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A7816A415;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org,
 Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:00:54 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0612151510130.26062@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612151510130.26062@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc: Peter Edwards <peadar@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: libpthread problem + possible solution
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:00:59 -0000

On Saturday 16 December 2006 04:11, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Peter Edwards wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've a problem when a process uses:
> >       libpthread
> >       detached threads
> >       mixed bound/unbound threads
> >       suspended threads  (a la pthread_resume_np())
> >
> > whereby some newly created suspended threads don't get scheduled.
> > I think I've tracked it down, so if someone could review the
> > reasoning, I'd be grateful.
>
> I'm away for a few days, so I'd appreciate you waiting until
> early next week -- unless David Xu looks at it and gives it
> the ok.
I will review it.

David Xu