From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Nov  4 02:32:06 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA00448
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 02:32:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from axl.training.iafrica.com (axl.training.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA00437
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 02:32:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.training.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.training.iafrica.com)
	by axl.training.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 0zb0E1-0002OO-00
	for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:31:42 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <axl@iafrica.com>
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: ports/PR's vs mail to freebsd-ports
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 12:31:40 +0200
Message-ID: <9197.910175500@axl.training.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Hi folks,

Are ports-related PR's read with the same level as interest as mail sent
to freebsd-ports?

I ask because I can imagine that ports-related PR's are "left 'til
later" on the grounds that they're not going anywhere. If this is the
case, then I'd obviously prefer to make my suggestions via the mailing
list first and then, should they meet with approval, submit appropriate
PR's.

If this isn't how it works, though, I'll just carry on sending PR's and
leaving the list alone.

Thanks,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message