Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:50:30 +1000 From: Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.3-RELEASE versus 5.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <484CE0C6.2000308@modulus.org> In-Reply-To: <484CD995.3040002@zircon.seattle.wa.us> References: <484CD995.3040002@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Kelsey wrote: > The entire problem comes down to the definition of -RELEASE. Jo > apparantly feels that they can ONLY run -RELEASE branded code at their > workplace. That means that they cannot run any form of -STABLE. Interesting, and unfortunate. Empirically, I always felt that the -STABLE branch shortly after each -RELEASE is the most stable. I suspect the reason is large numbers of people install or upgrade to a -RELEASE, discover and report a number of bugs which subsequently get fixed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?484CE0C6.2000308>