From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 29 16:50:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54CE1065672 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66138FC12 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1306117050; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:50:36 -0400 (EDT) References: Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?R3k/cmd5?= Vilmos Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:50:35 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:50:36 -0000 György Vilmos writes: > I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major > releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from > version to version. Thanks! Very interesting. Did you share it with the Postgresql list yet? I think they would find it very interesting. Any plans on doing simmilar tests with data that does not fit in memory? Also could you share what settings were used for postgres? Where any defaults changed? Effective memory, shared_buffers, etc... any of them adjusted for the machine's memory?