Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jul 1995 14:40:34 -0400
From:      dennis@et.htp.com (dennis)
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Wanted: 100bT EISA ethernet recommendation
Message-ID:  <199507111840.OAA08675@mail.htp.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> 
>> Tom's opinion....
>> >
>> >On Tue, 11 Jul 1995, dennis wrote:
>> >
>> >> The question is, who would build one? EISA cards are too expensive to
build
>> >> and EISA  is too slow for a 100mbs medium. If someone is making them then
>> >> I'll bet they have a much bigger marketing dept than engineering.
>> >
>> >  That's wrong.  EISA is fast enough for 100mbs ethernet.
>> 
>> It can't be wrong, because any way you slice it its an opinion. Under light
>> load anything will work, but under heavy load its nice if your bus
>> throughput is greater than the bandwidth. If your EISA card is bus mastering
>> it can take over your machine under heavy load. For a workstation, sure, but
>> not for a server. And EISA is too expensive for a workstation.
>> 
>> db
>
>EISA has a bus bandwidth of 33 mega*bytes* per second.
>
OK. I'll bite. Obviously my spec sheet is old/wrong or I don't get the new
math. The orginal EISA spec was 8.3mhz / 32 bits with 4-6 cycle access. This
is 88mbs best case with a real expectation of a little better than 60mbs
actual xfer capability. The knock on EISA has always been that its not that
much faster than ISA so this 32MB/s stuff must be new.

db




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507111840.OAA08675>