Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:16:52 +0330 From: Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> Cc: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPSEC in GENERIC [was: Re: netmap in GENERIC, by default, on HEAD] Message-ID: <545B89DC.2090305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bq%2BTcpFrufGV3Wj8QTH1CX6aBVuu_nw9gGD-pg99p270219RQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <92D22BEA-DDE5-4C6E-855C-B8CACB0319AC@neville-neil.com> <545A5C4D.3050603@FreeBSD.org> <03107CAB-445B-4BA9-8F50-69143E360010@neville-neil.com> <CA%2Bq%2BTcpFrufGV3Wj8QTH1CX6aBVuu_nw9gGD-pg99p270219RQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/6/2014 1:30 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > How to correctly bench IPSec performance ? > > For benching forwarding performance I generate minimum-size packet (2000 > flows: 100 different source IP * 20 different destination IP) like with > this netmap's pkt-gen example: > pkt-gen -i ix0 -f tx -n 1000000000 -l 60 -d 9.1.1.1:2000-9.1.1.100 > -s 8.1.1.1:2000-8.1.1.20 > > => This permit me to obtain the maximum PPS forwarded by the server. May be off-topic: How much PPS and on which hardware? > > But for benching IPSec: Is the PPS with minimum-size packet a useful value ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards. Hooman Fazaeli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?545B89DC.2090305>