Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:18:39 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>
To:        Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>,  FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Build Ports Without X11?
Message-ID:  <53D7F38F.9030808@passap.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVH-nJfZBAcy1GvQ91oOMKZPMAR9i7d_POx--x_j2Mtvag@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAHzLAVH-nJfZBAcy1GvQ91oOMKZPMAR9i7d_POx--x_j2Mtvag@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
29.07.2014 23:04, Rick Miller пишет:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am using Poudriere to bulk build packages and encountered a failure that
> resulted in the program skipping a couple ports.  The failure occurred due
> to an X11 error.  However, the expectation is that all ports would build
> without X11 thus negating the need to compile and build all the X11
> dependancies for various packages.
> 
> Despite the make.conf (shown below) specifying WITHOUT_X11, all these ports
> built with X11 support anyway.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I must be doing something wrong and hoping that someone
> might be able to lead me to the solution that will compile any port without
> X11 support.
> 
> Packages failed/skipped:
> 
> gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.22: failed
> gtk2-2.24.22_3: skipped due to above failure
> vim-7.4.364: skipped due to above failure
> 
> make.conf:
> 
> # cat 10_0-amd64-make.conf
> WITH_PKGNG=YES
> PERL_VERSION=5.16.3
> WITHOUT_X11=YES

I'd say that the last line should be:
-----
OPTIONS_UNSET=X11
-----

Well, and the port also should be configured to use option X11.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D7F38F.9030808>