Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 May 2013 09:02:54 -0400
From:      George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org>
To:        Brendan Gregg <brendan.gregg@joyent.com>
Cc:        rstone@freebsd.org, freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: adding SDT probe functions with 6+ DTrace arguments
Message-ID:  <9900CFFB-6E68-4034-805A-859A937179EF@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BXzFFjOE7y4QueSuqw8zcWMWk7pVyGKifZwgbZcANXYpKrVyA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20130530040705.GA40320@gloom> <CALWP=0aRG5zjcNBJsgA0gwp9x8J_gxEtagfVy3JfK2ePC0J0jA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BXzFFjOE7y4QueSuqw8zcWMWk7pVyGKifZwgbZcANXYpKrVyA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On May 30, 2013, at 2:14 , Brendan Gregg <brendan.gregg@joyent.com> =
wrote:

> G'Day Mark,
>=20
> As this might be interesting: to check that DTRACE_PROBE7 worked, in
> Solaris I had added an sdt:::test probe, which could be invoked by the
> DTrace test suite (sdt/tst.sdtargs.c) by calling uadmin() with =
A_SDTTEST:
>=20
>        case A_SDTTEST:
>        {
>                DTRACE_PROBE7(test, int, 1, int, 2, int, 3, int, 4, =
int, 5,
>                    int, 6, int, 7);
>                break;
>        }
>=20
> Getting the tcp and ip providers working will be great.
>=20

Chiming in late.  Yes, let's extend the SDT macros in line with what =
we've done
already.  This will also make it easy to MFC to 9 and 8.

Best,
George




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9900CFFB-6E68-4034-805A-859A937179EF>