From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Sep 22 21:00:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4047B10A3C64 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58A182E8B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 840E810A3C61; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C7C10A3C60 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1E982E85 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FE7128E6 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w8ML0Wvd001181 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w8ML0WHB001171 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231486] www/mod_php56 should be upgraded to www/mod_php71 after "pkg upgrade -a" Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: saper@saper.info X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 21:00:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231486 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Cie=C5=9Blak --- Hi Torsten I read the UPDATING notice that informed me about php default version switch and this is fine. The problem is (as I see it) that wordpress says it needs both some PHP mod= ules and the webserver module: USES=3D php:web cpe USE_PHP=3D curl gd hash mysqli pcre tokenizer xml zip zlib ftp and we let "curl gd hash ..." modules to update, but the former stays as it was. If I read properly, the dependency is based on the current PHP_VER: RUN_DEPENDS+=3D=20=20 ${PHPBASE}/${APACHEMODDIR}/libphp${PHP_VER:C/.$//}.so:${MOD_PHP_PORT} so for ports it wouldn't be a problem. Maybe it is the problem with pkg not understanding the above? It's definitely a POLA violation (my opinion only), and UPDATING entry does= not mention this issue specifically. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=