From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 21:32:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2FC16A400 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from skywagon.kjsl.com (skywagon.kjsl.com [69.36.240.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2928C13C428 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 21:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from [199.46.16.11] (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com [64.102.254.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by skywagon.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB772A68CC; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:32:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <45CB964C.8090409@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070208092346.072F513C47E@mx1.freebsd.org> <45CB8C33.7020608@FreeBSD.org> <45CB964C.8090409@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <18F7B6AF-0997-4209-B92E-1E7D4CCDEA19@kjsl.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Javier Henderson Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:32:16 -0500 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Steven Bens Subject: Re: Serious Bind issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:32:20 -0000 On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Javier Henderson wrote: > >> FWIW, I was running BIND 9.3.2 for a while and in awe at the >> amount of >> memory it would use, and how it would go CPU bound after it hit any >> operating system imposed memory quotas. > > Many people have reported this problem, but no one has been able to > follow up on getting it fixed. > >> I went back to BIND 8.latest, and my problems went away. > > ... but only for the short term. Development has stopped on BIND 8, > and I'm planning to deprecate the BIND 8 ports now that FreeBSD 4.x > has been EOL'ed. BIND 9 is not even the wave of the future, it's now > the present, and if it's not working for you it's incumbent on you to > contact the bind-users@isc.org list and do what you can to help > diagnose this problem, and test the fixes. Sure. What would you like me to do? I can easily set up a test box to mirror my main nameserver, which is authoritative for over 2000 domains, and test away. -jav