Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:14:01 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: open64 fbsd port? Message-ID: <E8B59B1B-F179-4B41-8AE7-9754B46877FC@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20091120170132.GA62790@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091120164741.GA59827@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091120170132.GA62790@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:47:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> Is there a fbsd port of open64 (http://www.open64.net/), >> or any branched project? >> >> In particular there is a mention of ORC (http://ipf-orc.sourceforge.net/) >> specifically for ia64, but the pages are very out of date. >> >> And then there's something called Aurora, which seems to be the same >> as ORC (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipf-orc/), but also *very* >> out of date. > > And also there is OpenUH, primarilily for ia64, but linux: > > OpenUH Source code, > IA-64, Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 and gcc 3.x > openuh-alpha.src.tar.gz 90.2 MB Looks like a branch off of Open64. > > and Path64 (http://www.path64.com/) I don't believe Path64 has an ia64 backend (it's optimized for amd64), but that may be pulled from Open64. I think Path64 may be a better investment than Open64 (for FreeBSD), if the project is more open... > I understand no fbsd ports for these compilers exist yet? Correct. -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8B59B1B-F179-4B41-8AE7-9754B46877FC>