Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 00:38:19 +0100 From: Joe User <mailinglists@rootservice.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting PRs fixed [ was: Re: The future of fortune(6) ] Message-ID: <3ynv445wJ8zMxDQ@devnoip.rootservice.org> In-Reply-To: <CAA3ZYrCCQPeSk4EvL=VN06R8C_FHkXmj%2BSor46t2sWPjzJTbJg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA3ZYrCCQPeSk4EvL=VN06R8C_FHkXmj%2BSor46t2sWPjzJTbJg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01.12.2017 00:13, Dieter BSD wrote: > Perhaps there should be a requirement to fix x old PRs to receive a > commit bit, and to fix y bugs/year to retain it. I don't especially > like this idea, but offer it mainly in hopes that it might inspire > someone to think of a way to improve it. Why not dedicate one quarter per year, possibly Q3, to fix the oldest bugs in base first (except current security-issues of course) and another quarter, possibly Q1, to fix the oldest bugs in ports first (except current security-issues and port-updates of course). In Q2 and Q4 there's then enough time to get new bugs fixed and new features developed. > I shouldn't have to say this, but when I say fixing a PR I mean just that. > Fixing it, not just closing it with some absurd excuse. I second that. Just my two cent, thanks. -- Kind Regards, Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Markus Kohlmeyer Markus Kohlmeyer PGP: 0xA4D76E4E / 801C 1779 D30A 6AFD 44F9 4A45 9F89 63BD A4D7 6E4E
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ynv445wJ8zMxDQ>