Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 04:00:41 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, dillon@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: First (easy) td_ucred patch Message-ID: <20020224040041.C35990@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202231111220.79221-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:21:24AM -0800 References: <XFMail.020222233807.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202231111220.79221-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:21:24AM -0800, Julian Elischer said words to the effect of; > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/ucred.patch > > > the structural rewriting in kern_proc.c should be done as a separate > commit. (though I agree it should be done) > > the structural rewriting in kern/sysv_*.c > could be done as a separate commit as well. > (I agree it is worth doing) > > I'll let you get away with unp_listen() :-) I'd like to point out that in all cases that you mention, the original structure before the "giant pushdown" is being restored. A lot of structural rewriting occured in those commits. It was not done separately. I don't recall if the patches were posted for review, I certainly never saw them. This strikes me as a double standard. Jake To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020224040041.C35990>