Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:56:16 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Ports building automatically with default options?
Message-ID:  <44ehoa4c0v.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <9B4C537601E64EE1BD4C8FC6C5CEFDCE@Rivendell> (Reko Turja's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:48:02 %2B0300")
References:  <EED1BC78E7CA47D38C582EAAB06DA714@Rivendell> <44ipdm4cy4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <9B4C537601E64EE1BD4C8FC6C5CEFDCE@Rivendell>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net> writes:

> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Lowell Gilbert
>
>> The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally.
>> Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether
>> /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports.
>
> That's the strange thing... Virgin system, just updated ports tree and
> index & started building. No knobs in make.conf and /var/db/ports is
> empty...

Strange indeed. What does "make config" do on this system?

Maybe you have something in your environment?

> I wonder if there's some kind of hickup going on at cvsup.se.freebsd.org...

I can't think of anything along those lines which would explain these
symptoms. 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ehoa4c0v.fsf>