From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 00:10:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090981065674 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC9E8FC08; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:10:37 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:10:37 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > I have a program that has run correctly since FreeBSD 3.7. However, > when upgrading the server to 7.0 I am encountering issues where values > just seem to arbirtrarily change. These values are all located in > memory allocated by malloc. Malloc was significantly changed with 7.0 > and reading through the malloc man page there are a number of flags that > can be set with /etc/malloc.conf. The default for that file is to not > exist. The man page does not indicate which settings are used in that > situation. After reading through it I get the feeling that the default > settings for D and M are 'dM'. Hence, to return to the older malloc > aproach to see if the problems go away I would need to set "Dm". But > some of the descriptions seem to indicate that might not be correct. > What are the default settings? I don't think those are the right questions to be asking. Firstly, if you did not recompile the program under 7.0 then it is not using the new malloc at all. If you did recompile it and it is behaving differently then it is probably because your program contains bugs in how it manages memory that happened to be working by accident with the old memory allocator. e.g. because you were making use of memory after it had been freed, but before the allocator returned it to some other malloc() call. Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" because the new allocator is completely new; it allocates memory based on its own strategy. None of the malloc options affect the behaviour of correct programs (but some of them can help to improve performance, or to debug incorrect programs). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 00:36:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05E9106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [206.117.18.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B138FC13 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.196] (pool-71-109-162-173.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.162.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6R0acBf016120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: From: Doug Hardie To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700 References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/7840/Sat Jul 26 17:10:52 2008 on zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:36:41 -0000 On Jul 26, 2008, at 17:10, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Doug Hardie wrote: >> I have a program that has run correctly since FreeBSD 3.7. >> However, when upgrading the server to 7.0 I am encountering issues >> where values just seem to arbirtrarily change. These values are >> all located in memory allocated by malloc. Malloc was >> significantly changed with 7.0 and reading through the malloc man >> page there are a number of flags that can be set with /etc/ >> malloc.conf. The default for that file is to not exist. The man >> page does not indicate which settings are used in that situation. >> After reading through it I get the feeling that the default >> settings for D and M are 'dM'. Hence, to return to the older >> malloc aproach to see if the problems go away I would need to set >> "Dm". But some of the descriptions seem to indicate that might not >> be correct. What are the default settings? > > I don't think those are the right questions to be asking. I fail to see why asking what the defaults are in not a valid question. That information should be documented in the man page (or at least the developer's manual). Dredging through malloc.c it appears that the defaults are actually DM. If so, that gives me 2 different options to try to see if the behavior changes (dM and Dm). Since those options affect the location of the data in the process address space its possible that one of them might come closer than DM to how malloc used to work. It might give a temporary workaround till the underlying issue can get resolved. > > > Firstly, if you did not recompile the program under 7.0 then it is > not using the new malloc at all. It was recompiled. All there is on the system is new stuff. It was built from scratch when 7.0 came out. > > > If you did recompile it and it is behaving differently then it is > probably because your program contains bugs in how it manages memory > that happened to be working by accident with the old memory > allocator. e.g. because you were making use of memory after it had > been freed, but before the allocator returned it to some other > malloc() call. That is certainly possible. However, the program has worked under considerable load for many years with versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The problems only occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy load. The developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on FreeBSD 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money because of it. > > > Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" because the > new allocator is completely new; it allocates memory based on its > own strategy. None of the malloc options affect the behaviour of > correct programs (but some of them can help to improve performance, > or to debug incorrect programs). Not surprising but I seem to recall that when it was first introduced into stable that there was some discussion on how to make it look more like the old malloc. I couldn't find that via a search though. > > > Kris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 00:55:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9A9106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF18FC1C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KMuY9-0005Ff-0t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:49 +0000 Received: from 89-172-38-237.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.38.237]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:49 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-38-237.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:49 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:55:36 +0200 Lines: 98 Message-ID: References: <20080725114402.G5386@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig63630725DBF5A87B69DB818C" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-38-237.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: <20080725114402.G5386@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: graid3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:55:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig63630725DBF5A87B69DB818C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i read the graid3 manual and http://www.acnc.com/04_01_03.html to make = > sure i know what's RAID3 and i don't understand few things. >=20 > 1) >=20 > "The number of components must be equal to 3, 5, 9, 17, etc. > (2^n + 1)." >=20 > why it can't be say 5 disks+parity? The reason is in the definition on "RAID 3", which says the updates to=20 the RAID device must be atomic. In some ideal universe, RAID 3 is=20 implemented in hardware and on individual bytes, but here we cannot=20 write to the drives in units other than sectorsize and sectorsize is 512 = bytes. Parity needs to be calculated with regards to each sector, so at the=20 sector level, the minimum number of sectors is three sectors: two for=20 data and one for parity. This means the high-level atomic sectorsize is=20 2*512=3D1024 bytes. If you inspect your RAID 3 devices, you'll see just t= hat: # diskinfo -v /dev/raid3/homes /dev/raid3/homes 1024 # sectorsize 107374181376 # mediasize in bytes (100G) 104857599 # mediasize in sectors But each drive has a normal sectorsize of 512: # diskinfo -v /dev/ad4 /dev/ad4 512 # sectorsize 80026361856 # mediasize in bytes (75G) 156301488 # mediasize in sectors Sector sizes cannot be arbitrary for various reasons, mostly dealing=20 with how memory pages and virtual memory are managed. In short, they=20 need to be powers of two. This restricts us to high-level ("big") sector = sizes that can be exactly one of the following values: 1024, 2048, 4096, = 8192, etc. Since drive sectors are fixed to 512 bytes, this means that=20 the number of *data* drives must also be a power of two: 2, 4, 8, 16,=20 etc. Add one more drive for the parity and you get the starting=20 sequence: 3, 5, 9, 17. In practice, this means that if you have 17 drives in RAID3, the=20 sectorsize of the array itself will be 16*512 =3D 8192. Each write to the= =20 array will update all 17 drives before returning (one sector on each=20 drive, ensuring an atomic operation). Note that the file system created=20 on such an array will also have its characteristics modified to the=20 sector size (the fragment size will be the sector size). > 2) "-r Use parity component for reading in round-robin fashion. > "Without this option the parity component is not used at > all for reading operations when the device is in a complete state. > With this option specified random I/O read operations are even 40% fas= ter > , but sequential reads are slower. One cannot use this option if the -= w=20 > option is also specified." >=20 >=20 > how parity disk could speed up random I/O? It will work well only when the number of drives is small (i.e. three=20 drives), by using the parity drive as a valid source of data, avoiding=20 some seeks to all drives. I think that, theoretically, you can save at=20 most 0.33 (1/3) of all seeks - I don't know where the 40% number comes fr= om. --------------enig63630725DBF5A87B69DB818C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIi8eJldnAQVacBcgRAmfQAKCRMuPfeZdLbi1GeVZmb3H8JgY6SwCgmOnU od/i6cQGCMEqMgGT84himXM= =WSbr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig63630725DBF5A87B69DB818C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 01:47:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF9B1065674 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63528FC1A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KMvMI-0006qy-5H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:38 +0000 Received: from 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.0.85.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:38 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:38 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:47:30 +0200 Lines: 72 Message-ID: References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6D50A49D044ABD83FF8E8B8B" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:47:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6D50A49D044ABD83FF8E8B8B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug Hardie wrote: >> If you did recompile it and it is behaving differently then it is=20 >> probably because your program contains bugs in how it manages memory=20 >> that happened to be working by accident with the old memory allocator.= =20 >> e.g. because you were making use of memory after it had been freed,=20 >> but before the allocator returned it to some other malloc() call. >=20 > That is certainly possible. However, the program has worked under=20 > considerable load for many years with versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems=20 > only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex and big. It uses=20 The memory allocator was the same between 3.7 and 6.x - it only changed=20 in 7.0. Your description looks like a use-after-free bug. Your=20 application is in C, not C++, right? > probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The problems only occur= =20 > reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy load. The developer is = > looking into it, but the problem only occurs on FreeBSD 7.0, not any=20 > other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money because of it. Some generic things to try: - add debug flags to malloc.conf, especially "J", maybe "X" and "P" and=20 see if anything abnormal comes up. If it does, the bug is in the program.= - run it on an older version of FreeBSD with debugging flags (for the=20 old malloc: "J", "X" and "Z"), also look for problems. - link with an alternative malloc, there are several in ports - link with a debugging malloc, try to see if there are bugs >> Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" because the=20 >> new allocator is completely new; it allocates memory based on its own = >> strategy. None of the malloc options affect the behaviour of correct = >> programs (but some of them can help to improve performance, or to=20 >> debug incorrect programs). >=20 > Not surprising but I seem to recall that when it was first introduced=20 > into stable that there was some discussion on how to make it look more = > like the old malloc. I couldn't find that via a search though. You can never make it look like the old malloc - that was the point of=20 introducing it. There could be a bug in the new malloc, but many complex = programs are running fine on it so the chances are slim. --------------enig6D50A49D044ABD83FF8E8B8B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIi9OyldnAQVacBcgRApwMAKCl4XZwGsgGVHL1jCqr1sfWWOT1oACgpHcx prCRuPgV2Bp1vhPa+2qyYcg= =o5fV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6D50A49D044ABD83FF8E8B8B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 02:04:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C311065689 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4230C8FC15 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl121-117.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.240.117]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6R240Rk029067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:04:07 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6R240Y6026789; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:04:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6R23wa4026788; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Hardie References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Doug Hardie's message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700") Message-ID: <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6R240Rk029067 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.797, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.60, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:04:15 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > On Jul 26, 2008, at 17:10, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Firstly, if you did not recompile the program under 7.0 then it is not >> using the new malloc at all. > > It was recompiled. All there is on the system is new stuff. It was > built from scratch when 7.0 came out. > >> If you did recompile it and it is behaving differently then it is >> probably because your program contains bugs in how it manages memory >> that happened to be working by accident with the old memory >> allocator. e.g. because you were making use of memory after it had >> been freed, but before the allocator returned it to some other >> malloc() call. > > That is certainly possible. However, the program has worked under > considerable load for many years with versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems > only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex and big. It uses > probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The problems only > occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy load. The > developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on FreeBSD > 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money > because of it. While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed important enough that it is now used by other projects too. What Kris wrote in: Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" because the new allocator is completely new; it allocates memory based on its own strategy. None of the malloc options affect the behaviour of correct programs (but some of them can help to improve performance, or to debug incorrect programs). is a bit important. Even if you tweak enough options the new malloc() may *not* work similarly enough for the program to keep working. If you are lsing money _right_ _now_ because of problems in the program, it may be worth going back to 6-STABLE and the old malloc() until the bugs of the program have been fixed by the developers. > Not surprising but I seem to recall that when it was first introduced > into stable that there was some discussion on how to make it look more > like the old malloc. I couldn't find that via a search though. If all else fails, you can try forward-porting phkmalloc to 7.X but it's not necessarily easier than going temporarily back to 6.X and fixing the program to work correctly on 7.X. It basically all boils down to ``How much time do you want to spend with a possibly crashing service?'' There's definitely a bug somewhere and you ultimately need it resolved. It is highly unlikely that it is in malloc() itself, but you can probably use its debugging features to help you find out if it is a bug in malloc() (see the preprocessor define MALLOC_PRODUCTION in libc/stdlib/malloc.c), or if it a bug in the program using malloc() and _where_ it may be. The new malloc() also includes an option that can dump 'utrace' debug output of all the malloc(), calloc(), realloc(), posix_memalign() and free() calls of malloc.c. If you haven't tried it already, it may be another useful tool to help you track down where the bug is. Tracing a program's malloc usage with the 'U' option is relatively easy to do if you spawn just *this* program with MALLOC_OPTIONS='U': # ktrace env MALLOC_OPTIONS='U' your-program-here Then you can dump the 'utrace' entries logged by ktrace, with: # kdump [optionally, more kdump options] -f ktrace.out You should see something like this: $ kdump -T -t u -f ktrace.out | head -40 26674 ls 1217123351.156040 USER malloc_init() 26674 ls 1217123351.156369 USER 0x8101000 = malloc(4096) 26674 ls 1217123351.156515 USER 0x8102000 = malloc(2560) 26674 ls 1217123351.156611 USER 0x8103800 = malloc(2048) 26674 ls 1217123351.156702 USER 0x810b020 = malloc(20) 26674 ls 1217123351.156881 USER free(0x8101000) 26674 ls 1217123351.157074 USER 0x8101000 = malloc(3191) 26674 ls 1217123351.157191 USER 0x810c000 = malloc(4096) 26674 ls 1217123351.157369 USER 0x810d000 = malloc(3219) 26674 ls 1217123351.157431 USER free(0x8101000) 26674 ls 1217123351.157538 USER free(0x810c000) 26674 ls 1217123351.157743 USER 0x810e400 = malloc(524) 26674 ls 1217123351.157865 USER 0x8104000 = malloc(1280) 26674 ls 1217123351.157922 USER 0x8101040 = malloc(89) 26674 ls 1217123351.157975 USER 0x81010a0 = malloc(90) 26674 ls 1217123351.158065 USER 0x8101100 = malloc(89) 26674 ls 1217123351.158170 USER free(0x8101100) [...] If your bug is a double-free bug, then a bit of post-processing of this will quickly reveal if there *is* a double free bug when a duplicate free() call is found. Then you can dump more ktrace records, in an effort to pinpoint the exact place where the original allocation happens, and you can keep going from there. If you see data changing 'under your feet' it's quite likely that you are trying to use data after it has been freed. A nice option that you can _enable_ to catch that in action is 'J'. By dumping the unexpected data and using the info from malloc.conf(5)'s description of 'J' you may find useful bits of information to track the bug down: J Each byte of new memory allocated by malloc(), realloc() or reallocf() will be initialized to 0xa5. All memory returned by free(), realloc() or reallocf() will be initialized to 0x5a. This is intended for debugging and will impact performance negatively. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 02:55:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164DB1065676 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7348FC18 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6R2ptRV036383; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:51:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m6R2psgk036382; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:51:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:51:54 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Jyun-Yi Liou <7yuny1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080727025154.GB36346@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <002c01c8eead$d08d4050$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> <81a9e3840807260518t5379f40ble7a7f696cd7c1389@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81a9e3840807260518t5379f40ble7a7f696cd7c1389@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Yavuz Maslak , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: crontab mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:55:31 -0000 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 08:18:14PM +0800, Jyun-Yi Liou wrote: > Hi Yavuz, > It's easy to tell crontab stop sending mail to you by disable sendmail in > /etc/rc.conf > > %> echo "sendmail_enable=\"NO\"" > man rc.conf for more information :-) Kind of overkill, don't you think? Sendmail does more than crontab mails. > > or set the variable MAILTO null on corntab > MAILTO="" Better. ////jerry > > Regards, > jyuny1 > > 2008/7/26 Yavuz Maslak > > > Hello > > > > On freebsd7.0, my crontab sends many mails about its jobs. > > > > I want crontab not to send these mails > > > > How can I do that ? > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 03:03:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48FB106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987988FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6R2xT0J036433; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m6R2xTM3036432; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:59:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:59:29 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: David Gurvich Message-ID: <20080727025929.GD36346@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <235b80000807251801u242157efre4c4a17092220391@mail.gmail.com> <20080725212512.5b4d1e3b@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080725212512.5b4d1e3b@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade from 6.3 to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:03:04 -0000 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:25:12PM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > You should not do the upgrade, Whatever would cause you to give such poor advice? > though you can. ZFS is still > experimental on FreeBSD though you can certainly use zfs pools on your > existing system. It works. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 03:04:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE60B1065683 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [206.117.18.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88668FC12 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.196] (pool-71-109-162-173.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.162.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6R340M2021522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:04:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: From: Doug Hardie To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:03:58 -0700 References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/7840/Sat Jul 26 17:10:52 2008 on zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:04:02 -0000 On Jul 26, 2008, at 18:47, Ivan Voras wrote: > Doug Hardie wrote: > >>> If you did recompile it and it is behaving differently then it is >>> probably because your program contains bugs in how it manages >>> memory that happened to be working by accident with the old memory >>> allocator. e.g. because you were making use of memory after it had >>> been freed, but before the allocator returned it to some other >>> malloc() call. >> That is certainly possible. However, the program has worked under >> considerable load for many years with versions 3.7 to 6.2. >> Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex and >> big. It uses > > The memory allocator was the same between 3.7 and 6.x - it only > changed in 7.0. Your description looks like a use-after-free bug. > Your application is in C, not C++, right? I can't say for sure as I have never looked at all the code. Part is in c though. I would tend to support that theory except that the area being modified is still allocated. It was never freed. Its value got changed to something that is not in any file on the computer. It is a reasonably recoginizable ascii string, but basically meangineless. Also, this app has been running for almost 5 years doing the same thing on earlier versions of FreeBSD. I know at least 6.1, 6.2, 5.4 5.3 and possibly earlier. I just don't recall which one was in use when we setup the workload that is causing the issue now. It still continues to run just fine on 6.3. > > >> probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The problems only >> occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy load. The >> developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on >> FreeBSD 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am >> losing money because of it. > > Some generic things to try: > - add debug flags to malloc.conf, especially "J", maybe "X" and "P" > and see if anything abnormal comes up. If it does, the bug is in the > program. > - run it on an older version of FreeBSD with debugging flags (for > the old malloc: "J", "X" and "Z"), also look for problems. > - link with an alternative malloc, there are several in ports > - link with a debugging malloc, try to see if there are bugs I'll give those a try. > > >>> Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" because >>> the new allocator is completely new; it allocates memory based on >>> its own strategy. None of the malloc options affect the behaviour >>> of correct programs (but some of them can help to improve >>> performance, or to debug incorrect programs). >> Not surprising but I seem to recall that when it was first >> introduced into stable that there was some discussion on how to >> make it look more like the old malloc. I couldn't find that via a >> search though. > > You can never make it look like the old malloc - that was the point > of introducing it. There could be a bug in the new malloc, but many > complex programs are running fine on it so the chances are slim. This is definitely a difficult issue. The majority of malloc calls are actually within strdup. There are no frees for any of those returned values. They live till the program ends. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 03:18:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DFC1065679; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [206.117.18.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5998FC13; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.196] (pool-71-109-162-173.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.162.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6R3I6v3021890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:18:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: From: Doug Hardie To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:18:05 -0700 References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/7840/Sat Jul 26 17:10:52 2008 on zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:18:12 -0000 On Jul 26, 2008, at 19:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite > extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in > FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was > deemed > important enough that it is now used by other projects too. while in general I like the new approach, this problem has been a killer. I did find a number of errors in my own code where I was not allocating enough space for some things. Those showed up instantly with 7.0 and were easy to fix. > > > What Kris wrote in: > > Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" > because the new allocator is completely new; it allocates > memory based on its own strategy. None of the malloc options > affect the behaviour of correct programs (but some of them > can help to improve performance, or to debug incorrect > programs). > > is a bit important. Even if you tweak enough options the new malloc() > may *not* work similarly enough for the program to keep working. If > you > are lsing money _right_ _now_ because of problems in the program, it > may > be worth going back to 6-STABLE and the old malloc() until the bugs of > the program have been fixed by the developers. Unfortunately that is not possible. We upgraded the hardware and some of the components were not supported very well under 6.x. Despite several weeks of testing of the new hardware and 7.0, the problem did not arise till several weeks after going into production. It takes about a week of real time before the problem tends to become visible. By compressing the workload I have been able to setup a test machine such that it takes 2-4 days before it occurs. > > >> Not surprising but I seem to recall that when it was first introduced >> into stable that there was some discussion on how to make it look >> more >> like the old malloc. I couldn't find that via a search though. > > If all else fails, you can try forward-porting phkmalloc to 7.X but > it's > not necessarily easier than going temporarily back to 6.X and fixing > the > program to work correctly on 7.X. > > It basically all boils down to ``How much time do you want to spend > with > a possibly crashing service?'' > > There's definitely a bug somewhere and you ultimately need it > resolved. > It is highly unlikely that it is in malloc() itself, but you can > probably use its debugging features to help you find out if it is a > bug > in malloc() (see the preprocessor define MALLOC_PRODUCTION in > libc/stdlib/malloc.c), or if it a bug in the program using malloc() > and > _where_ it may be. > > The new malloc() also includes an option that can dump 'utrace' debug > output of all the malloc(), calloc(), realloc(), posix_memalign() and > free() calls of malloc.c. If you haven't tried it already, it may be > another useful tool to help you track down where the bug is. > > Tracing a program's malloc usage with the 'U' option is relatively > easy > to do if you spawn just *this* program with MALLOC_OPTIONS='U': > > # ktrace env MALLOC_OPTIONS='U' your-program-here > > Then you can dump the 'utrace' entries logged by ktrace, with: > > # kdump [optionally, more kdump options] -f ktrace.out > > You should see something like this: > > $ kdump -T -t u -f ktrace.out | head -40 > 26674 ls 1217123351.156040 USER malloc_init() > 26674 ls 1217123351.156369 USER 0x8101000 = malloc(4096) > 26674 ls 1217123351.156515 USER 0x8102000 = malloc(2560) > 26674 ls 1217123351.156611 USER 0x8103800 = malloc(2048) > 26674 ls 1217123351.156702 USER 0x810b020 = malloc(20) > 26674 ls 1217123351.156881 USER free(0x8101000) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157074 USER 0x8101000 = malloc(3191) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157191 USER 0x810c000 = malloc(4096) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157369 USER 0x810d000 = malloc(3219) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157431 USER free(0x8101000) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157538 USER free(0x810c000) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157743 USER 0x810e400 = malloc(524) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157865 USER 0x8104000 = malloc(1280) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157922 USER 0x8101040 = malloc(89) > 26674 ls 1217123351.157975 USER 0x81010a0 = malloc(90) > 26674 ls 1217123351.158065 USER 0x8101100 = malloc(89) > 26674 ls 1217123351.158170 USER free(0x8101100) > [...] > > If your bug is a double-free bug, then a bit of post-processing of > this > will quickly reveal if there *is* a double free bug when a duplicate > free() call is found. Then you can dump more ktrace records, in an > effort to pinpoint the exact place where the original allocation > happens, and you can keep going from there. > > If you see data changing 'under your feet' it's quite likely that you > are trying to use data after it has been freed. A nice option that > you > can _enable_ to catch that in action is 'J'. By dumping the > unexpected > data and using the info from malloc.conf(5)'s description of 'J' you > may > find useful bits of information to track the bug down: > > J Each byte of new memory allocated by malloc(), realloc() > or reallocf() will be initialized to 0xa5. All memory > returned by free(), realloc() or reallocf() will be > initialized to 0x5a. This is intended for debugging and > will impact performance negatively. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 03:23:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40DC1065689 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3CB8FC13 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uqPx1Z0030ldTLk5ArDoDd; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:13:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.112] ([71.224.148.92]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id urDo1Z0021zr1Gv3QrDo3A; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:13:48 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=M4kaB8BR_DoZZ3BDUhMA:9 a=318zkvJhE12lucsdCjQA:9 a=ch5jIBzjeoednTd2QZsA:7 a=7wKwcIHUypPAdrDMUt8FLtfwOxUA:4 a=oH_WKSxD8ioA:10 Message-ID: <488BE7AE.1010201@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:12:46 -0400 From: Jason Lenthe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: SATA300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:23:49 -0000 My machine, a home-brew running 7.0-RELEASE-p2, has 3 SATA hard drives all of which were advertised, I believe, as SATA300 drives, but: vader# dmesg | grep ATA ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 ad4: 305245MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad5: 476940MB at ata2-slave SATA150 ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting? Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 03:39:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D251065674 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C7C8FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uoKK1Z0050b6N64A8rPWwG; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:23:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.112] ([71.224.148.92]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id urPT1Z00D1zr1Gv8PrPVmY; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:23:29 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=j2OSYxBuMc_VF0tojv4A:9 a=318zkvJhE12lucsdCjQA:9 a=VO6VtIs-GNJ3p5xC4T4A:7 a=7wKwcIHUypPAdrDMUt8FLtfwOxUA:4 a=oH_WKSxD8ioA:10 Message-ID: <488BE9F2.1070409@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:22:26 -0400 From: Jason Lenthe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SATA300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:39:30 -0000 My machine, a home-brew running 7.0-RELEASE-p2, has 3 SATA hard drives all of which were advertised as SATA300 drives, but: vader# dmesg | grep ATA ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 ad4: 305245MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad5: 476940MB at ata2-slave SATA150 ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting? Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 04:24:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F8B1065679 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24A08FC0C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:24:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:60993 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KMxo8-00053p-6X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:24:32 +0200 Received: (qmail 96136 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2008 06:24:29 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2008 06:24:29 +0200 Received: (qmail 110 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jul 2008 06:24:29 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:24:29 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Jason Lenthe Message-ID: <20080727042429.GA99908@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <488BE9F2.1070409@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <488BE9F2.1070409@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KMxo8-00053p-6X. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KMxo8-00053p-6X 9918f659a68059d3636d33cc28320fa5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:24:33 -0000 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:22:26PM -0400, Jason Lenthe wrote: > My machine, a home-brew running 7.0-RELEASE-p2, has 3 SATA hard drives > all of which were advertised as SATA300 drives, but: > > vader# dmesg | grep ATA > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > atapci1: port > 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af > irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > ata2: on atapci1 > ata3: on atapci1 > ad4: 305245MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad5: 476940MB at ata2-slave SATA150 > ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting? Considering that the fastest SATA drives available today tops out at a throughput of about 120MB/s (and most are quite a bit slower), I would say that any speed loss from running at SATA150 speed instead of SATA300 will be fairly minor and probably not even noticable. Many SATA hard drives have a jumper that can be used to limit them to SATA150 speeds. It is often set by default, since some older SATA controllers fail to auto-negotiate speed correctly, so the drive must be running at SATA150 to work with those controllers. See if you drives have such a jumper set. If so try removing it. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 08:54:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7B61065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from bene1.itea.ntnu.no (bene1.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6528FC14 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bene1.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61E016C6C2 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by bene1.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id E3BA016C87B for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 90392 invoked by uid 88); 27 Jul 2008 10:53:59 +0200 Received: from maren.math.ntnu.no (HELO weld.ej2.thelosingend.net) (129.241.211.48) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:53:59 +0200 Message-ID: <488C37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:54:05 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <488B147D.5050009@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488B5048.7080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <488B5048.7080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bene1.itea.ntnu.no Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:54:19 -0000 Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >> I want to upgrade two freebsd machines I have from 6.1-SECURITY >> and 5.3-RELEASE respectively, to the latest 7.0 release of >> FreeBSD. I don't want to cvsup and build, but prefer to use >> prebuilt binaries. Also I'd like to avoid wiping the systems, >> and starting afresh. Matthew Seaman wrote: > If your 6.1 system is using a system installed from one of the > official iso images and hasn't been locally rebuilt (upgrading > via freebsd-updates is OK though) then there is a quicker way. > See > > http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11.html Now this is what I'm talking about! I can't relly remember anymore, since it's so long ago, but I'm pretty sure I upgraded the box that is now 6.1 from some 5.x version, taking a binary route. I can't find the instructions anymore. Maybe I'm mistaken :-/ Upgrading FreeBSD across major versions is such a drag, that I allways postpone it. And now it's way overdue. I guess I just have to bite the bullet and wipe the system clean, and start afresh. The 6.1 system seem to be running 7.0-p2 now, though. Thanks! It is still upgrading ports. Fortunately this box does nothing important, and is just my personal playground. If something gets messed up, noe problem. I'm trying to upgrade the ports binary as well, using "portupgrade -a -PP", and it seems to get the packages from RELEASE, not the latest versions that are in the ports tree. But as long as all ports use the same consistent set, I'm pretty sure it will work out nicely. My local ports tree will be out of sync, though, which might cause problems later? Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? Also, re: the freebsd-update, if I've built a system from source, say 7.0-RELEASE. And I want to upgrade it binary to -p2. If my home built system is basically like the prebuilt release, I should be fine, but freebsd-update won't let me do this, right? Anyway to overcome this? Thanks! Svein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 09:48:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB268106567B for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (llca513-a.servidoresdns.net [217.76.128.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE468FC1F for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from mail.dsa.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1F21104042 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:47:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 84.18.27.248 (SquirrelMail authenticated user faf352c) by mail.dsa.es with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:47:44 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3267.84.18.27.248.1217152064.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:47:44 -0000 (GMT) From: "DSA - JCR" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Root boot/mount Password? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:48:39 -0000 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:31:23PM -0000, DSA - JCR wrote: >> Hi all >> >> FreeBSD 6.2 >> >> I would like to put a password when booting/mounting mi Freebsd box. is it possible? How? > >Yes. Use geli(8) encryption. > >> is for protecting the system from unauthorized users > >Disk encryption also protects your data if the PC or harddrive is stolen. >Roland > Yes, I had thinking of Geli, but my system is up and running and I don't know if I can use geli for this without breaking all I have used geli for unused disks and for swap but not for root, because i dont know if I will break all.... can I use it for root, when it is a live system? Of course i don't think in methods like BIOS because simply taking the battery out can reset all. Juan Coruña Desarrollo de Software Atlantico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 09:58:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F70106566B for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3BE8FC0A; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488C46B1.5040001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:58:09 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:58:12 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2008, at 19:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite >> extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in >> FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed >> important enough that it is now used by other projects too. > > while in general I like the new approach, this problem has been a > killer. I did find a number of errors in my own code where I was not > allocating enough space for some things. Those showed up instantly with > 7.0 and were easy to fix. I am not sure you are getting the point. The bugs are exposed by accident, not by design, because the programs were only working by accident, not by design. There will probably be a new subset of buggy programs that sometimes fail to crash under the new allocator. >> What Kris wrote in: >> >> Finally, there is no way to revert to the "old approach" >> because the new allocator is completely new; it allocates >> memory based on its own strategy. None of the malloc options >> affect the behaviour of correct programs (but some of them >> can help to improve performance, or to debug incorrect >> programs). >> >> is a bit important. Even if you tweak enough options the new malloc() >> may *not* work similarly enough for the program to keep working. If you >> are lsing money _right_ _now_ because of problems in the program, it may >> be worth going back to 6-STABLE and the old malloc() until the bugs of >> the program have been fixed by the developers. > > Unfortunately that is not possible. We upgraded the hardware and some > of the components were not supported very well under 6.x. Despite > several weeks of testing of the new hardware and 7.0, the problem did > not arise till several weeks after going into production. It takes > about a week of real time before the problem tends to become visible. > By compressing the workload I have been able to setup a test machine > such that it takes 2-4 days before it occurs. Your choices are: 1) Debug the application 2) Build a 6.x binary and use that forever under compatibility 3) Compile your own private copy of phkmalloc and link your application to it, and hope the bugs never return. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 09:59:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D85C1065672 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0174D8FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6R9xTV1099698; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:59:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m6R9xTV1099698 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217152770; bh=lfBi8V6EkvRORx q5g84RNUMN7PcgJowIwcodqli/Ev0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<488C46FB.2070302@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Sun,=2 027=20Jul=202008=2010:59:23=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Svein=20Halvor=20Halvorsen=20|C C:=20questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Binary=20upgrade=20from =20legacy=20version=20+=20ports|References:=20<488B147D.5050009@lvo r.halvorsen.cc>=20<488B5048.7080200@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<488C 37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc>|In-Reply-To:=20<488C37AD.50305@lvor.h alvorsen.cc>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart /signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application /pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig25EF53C9CBD6 663EDAB2C7A6"; b=rZRcjjqWPvhyKFLZH+92zf+uqLSQErAPiIr8GTjjZTVdyTflkf WbIudXulF5+o24KKIhQKYDruGFQj2LxTdp8Tthl8gTGqZM1ueF81m0zay98PPcoHMT/ PifX7gIquUbGXJSFV3d6Ir0XkpUltrzl5kwGQSOHXGhfqhZ1X7tKzM= Message-ID: <488C46FB.2070302@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:59:23 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen References: <488B147D.5050009@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488B5048.7080200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <488C37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc> In-Reply-To: <488C37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig25EF53C9CBD6663EDAB2C7A6" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:59:30 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7846/Sun Jul 27 08:51:59 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:59:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig25EF53C9CBD6663EDAB2C7A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > The 6.1 system seem to be running 7.0-p2 now, though. Thanks! > It is still upgrading ports. Fortunately this box does nothing > important, and is just my personal playground. If something gets > messed up, noe problem. I'm trying to upgrade the ports binary as > well, using "portupgrade -a -PP", and it seems to get the packages > from RELEASE, not the latest versions that are in the ports tree. > But as long as all ports use the same consistent set, I'm pretty > sure it will work out nicely. My local ports tree will be out of > sync, though, which might cause problems later? Yes, this will work in the sense that the software will all be functional. If you're installing the RELEASE packages, you won't get any security related fixes that have gone into the ports since=20 7.0-RELEASE came out. Try running 'portaudit -Fda' and see what it shows up. You should still be able to update using packages from the FTP servers though -- the process of updating packages runs pretty frequently, but it does take a while to chew through all of the updates so what's on the FTP servers is usually some days adrift of the state of the ports tree in CVS. But really no more than that. > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? Nope. All 7.x releases should be ABI compatible -- including STABLE and RELEASE. So long as you get the inter-package dependencies right everything should work fine. I know the ABI promise guarantees that anything compiled on an earlier 7.x version will continue to run on a later one, and I believe it also now requires programs compiled on a later 7.x system to run on an earlier one. In any case, the move to versioned symbols makes the whole problem pretty much go away. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig25EF53C9CBD6663EDAB2C7A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiMRwEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzFJACgk8suaSYLN1ONZofiw88XT1Qq 03kAoJFnhH3zpvPiBGxouFk0u+myhPpw =PQWj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig25EF53C9CBD6663EDAB2C7A6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 10:12:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943141065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142888FC1A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6RACGgd022923; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:12:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8F9A1BA96; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:12:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:12:16 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: DSA - JCR Message-ID: <20080727101216.GA42938@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <3267.84.18.27.248.1217152064.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3267.84.18.27.248.1217152064.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root boot/mount Password? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:12:19 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:47:44AM -0000, DSA - JCR wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:31:23PM -0000, DSA - JCR wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> FreeBSD 6.2 > >> > >> I would like to put a password when booting/mounting mi Freebsd box. is > >> it possible? How? > > > >Yes. Use geli(8) encryption. > > > >> is for protecting the system from unauthorized users > > > >Disk encryption also protects your data if the PC or harddrive is stolen. > >Roland > > >=20 > Yes, I had thinking of Geli, but my system is up and running and I don't > know if I can use geli for this without breaking all > I have used geli for unused disks and for swap but not for root, because i > dont know if I will break all.... >=20 > can I use it for root, when it is a live system? You can encrypt the root filesystem, but in that case /boot must be on a separate unencrypted partition, otherwise the OS cannot boot. So unless you have a spare partition for /boot, you'll have to make backups and re-partition your disk. Note that encrypting the partitions where the OS lives is not particularly usefull; there is nothing secret there. On the contrary, it would potentially make the encrypted partition vulnerable to a known plaintext attack. So what I would recommend it to put all _your_ data (which you want to protect from unauthorized access) on one partition (in case of a desktop, I'd use /home), and encrypt that. To do this you should back up all your data. Then you fill the partition with random noise using 'dd if=3D/dev/random'. This can take some time depending on the size of the partition. As soon as that is done you can use 'geli init' to initialize a geli-encrypted device, and 'geli attach' to make a device node. Then you can use newfs on the new device, mount it and restore your backup. Now edit /etc/fstab to refer to the geli device. On the next boot, the rc scripts will ask for the password and take care of the mounting of the device. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiMSgAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWWMQCfa049HLzLXIRBsLgWfunMZNJg 1oYAnjU87cNrMn8D7gmG+pK/MgLd2dVs =HcY0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 10:53:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617D61065673 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237B98FC08 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4102299E5 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:53:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.1 (20080629) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sKI8pNZQudLT for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:53:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 816F129392 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:53:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:52:56 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:53:03 -0000 Hello, I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale =20 DNS server. I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X=85 This has been useless!! I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without =20 breaking the system=85 What would you suggest? Like removing X and It's dependencies=85 I can also remove all apps in the port tree and recompile only the one =20= needed=85 What's best what do you suggest. I'd rather do painful jobs now than in 6 months when everything will =20 be up and running !! Thanks. =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 11:50:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D1F1065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd_bronson@sbcglobal.net) Received: from cheyenne.hanadarko.com (75-9-98-151.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net [75.9.98.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452728FC16 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd_bronson@sbcglobal.net) Received: from lenovo.sbcglobal.net (lenovo.hanadarko.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.hanadarko.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m6RBWmF4076016 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:32:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200807271132.m6RBWmF4076016@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:32:48 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Bronson Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: 7.0-make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:50:30 -0000 Has this been removed or is it still supported? It does not appear in the man page or examples... NO_BIND=true -JD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 12:13:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9FF106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd_bronson@sbcglobal.net) Received: from cheyenne.hanadarko.com (75-9-98-151.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net [75.9.98.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2C78FC08 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd_bronson@sbcglobal.net) Received: from lenovo.sbcglobal.net (lenovo.hanadarko.com [10.43.82.5]) by cheyenne.hanadarko.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m6RCDSlt001639 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:13:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200807271213.m6RCDSlt001639@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:13:28 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Bronson In-Reply-To: <6EE319AEA79D42F49038FE83B14E841F@rivendell> References: <200807271132.m6RBWmF4076016@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> <6EE319AEA79D42F49038FE83B14E841F@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: 7.0-make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:13:31 -0000 At 03:03 PM 7/27/2008 +0300, Reko Turja wrote: >make.conf has been split into two, the actual make.conf which has >variables for the make process and generic make environment and >src.conf which controls the building of "add-on" software. Check >src.conf for details. > >-Reko so something like this it seems: WITHOUT_BIND=true WITHOUT_GAMES=true WITHOUT_MAILWRAPPER=true WITHOUT_OPENSSH=true WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true I am not sure of the need for the 'true' or not. it seems it is not required but should work either way? -JD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 12:21:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0187106567F for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9058FC14 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21021CC76; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:00:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SwdIuJtxiIxF; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:00:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a88-114-132-159.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.132.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1541CC66; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:00:23 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <6EE319AEA79D42F49038FE83B14E841F@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: , "JD Bronson" References: <200807271132.m6RBWmF4076016@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:03:52 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 Cc: Subject: Re: 7.0-make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:21:15 -0000 > Has this been removed or is it still supported? > It does not appear in the man page or examples... > > > NO_BIND=true make.conf has been split into two, the actual make.conf which has variables for the make process and generic make environment and src.conf which controls the building of "add-on" software. Check src.conf for details. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 12:25:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584D41065677 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from hrimail.hri.res.in (hrimail.hri.res.in [210.212.50.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8842D8FC18 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from ipc2.mri.ernet.in (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by hrimail.hri.res.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946B97E8D; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:03:17 +0530 (IST) Received: from ipc2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipc2 (Postfix) with SMTP id A02722304F; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:55:47 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (riemann.mri.ernet.in [192.168.3.122]) by ipc2.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0914526; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:55:47 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6RCIbHg002441; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:37 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu@riemann.mri.ernet.in) Received: (from raghu@localhost) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m6RCILpF002440; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:21 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu) From: "N. Raghavendra" To: bsd In-Reply-To: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> (bsd@todoo.biz's message of "Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:52:56 +0200") References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> X-Organization: Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) X-Address: Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India X-URL: http://www.mri.ernet.in/ and http://www.retrotexts.net/ X-Phone: +91 (532) 2667 509, 2667 318, 2667 578, 2567 746, 2567 747 X-Fax: +91 (532) 2667 576, 2567 748, 2567 444, 2568 036 X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x03618806 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: C75D D0AF 457E 7454 BEC2 37AD C6E1 0407 0361 8806 X-OpenPGP-Public-Key-Available-At: http://www.keyserver.net/ Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:21 +0530 Message-ID: <86k5f7h65u.fsf@riemann.mri.ernet.in> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "N. Raghavendra" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:25:57 -0000 At 2008-07-27T12:52:56+02:00, bsd wrote: > Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without > breaking the system=E2=80=A6 What would you suggest? One way is to use the `ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves' port to iteratively remove the superfluous leaves of your package tree. It can also be done with `ports-mgmt/portmanager' (with the -slid option) or `ports-mgmt/portmaster' (with the -s option). Raghavendra. --=20 N. Raghavendra | http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute | http://www.mri.ernet.in/ See message headers for contact and OpenPGP information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 12:31:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AF2106567C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0038FC0C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:31:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [80.217.98.23] (c80-217-98-23.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.98.23]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6RCVFpI009354; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:31:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <488C6A8E.1090001@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:31:10 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:31:19 -0000 bsd : > Hello, > > I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS > server. > I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X… > > This has been useless!! Better doing it your self. > I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! > > Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without > breaking the system… > What would you suggest? pkg_delete * This will remove ALL packages installed. It has worked for me in the past but be careful! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 12:36:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081B01065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YH=1e5f3621@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C028FC0C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YH=1e5f3621@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186CA163DFA for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:21:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D6423E49C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:21:34 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080727132134.1376b8b8@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:36:47 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:52:56 +0200 bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale > DNS server. > I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X___ > > This has been useless!! > > I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! > > Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without > breaking the system___ If you want to remove X you can use a leaf-cutting tool like ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves. But I would have thought that a dns server would require only very few ports (possibly even zero if you use the default BIND), so it might be simpler to start over. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 13:02:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB8B1065676 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975F58FC17 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB1A1CCB2; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:04 +0300 (EEST) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id eDfsUnWZZnHD; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:03 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a88-114-132-159.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.132.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2991CCB0; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:00:03 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: From: "Reko Turja" To: , "JD Bronson" References: <200807271132.m6RBWmF4076016@cheyenne.hanadarko.com><6EE319AEA79D42F49038FE83B14E841F@rivendell> <200807271213.m6RCDSlt001639@cheyenne.hanadarko.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:03:32 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 Cc: Subject: Re: 7.0-make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:59 -0000 > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true > > I am not sure of the need for the 'true' or not. it seems it is not > required but should work either way? >From the manpage: The values of variables are ignored regardless of their setting; even if they would be set to ``FALSE'' or ``NO''. Just the existence of an option will cause it to be honoured by make(1). so the plain option is enough. If the machines are in environment where they might be someday administered by someone else, I'd use pure option to avoid confusing someone who hasn't read the manpage and thinks setting variables to false will void them. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 13:17:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD461065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9941B8FC1A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 11977 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2008 13:17:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.182.68) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 27 Jul 2008 13:17:45 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CFE5817053; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080727131744.GA71110@ozzmosis.com> References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:17:49 -0000 On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd (bsd@todoo.biz) wrote: > I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS > server. > I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X? > > This has been useless!! > > I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! He probably just went with the defaults. > Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without > breaking the system? > What would you suggest? > > Like removing X and It's dependencies? > > > I can also remove all apps in the port tree and recompile only the one > needed? > > What's best what do you suggest. FreeBSD provides a "base system" with software such as a SSH daemon, Sendmail, BIND, etc. You can uninstall all the packages on your system, but the FreeBSD base system will still remain. This allows FreeBSD to boot normally without any packages installed. I recommend you uninstall all packages (with 'pkg_delete -a', or 'pkg_delete -av' if you want to watch all the files being deleted), then install only what you need from the Ports tree. Your DNS server should probably not require any packages to be installed, as DNS server software (BIND) is provided with the FreeBSD base system. But that really depends what your requirements are. Regards Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 14:55:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C77106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009398FC08 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-84-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.84.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F89716C0052 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:55:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m6REttB1001628 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:55:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:55:55 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080727165555.5a5836f7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20080727131744.GA71110@ozzmosis.com> References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> <20080727131744.GA71110@ozzmosis.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:55:59 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:17:44 +1000, andrew clarke wrote: > On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd (bsd@todoo.biz) wrote: > > > I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large scale DNS > > server. > > I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X? > > > > This has been useless!! > > > > I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! "In" or "from"? If they are in the ports tree but not installed, don't mind. If they are installed, deinstall them as recommended, using pkg_delete for example. > > I can also remove all apps in the port tree and recompile only the one > > needed? > > > > What's best what do you suggest. > > FreeBSD provides a "base system" with software such as a SSH daemon, > Sendmail, BIND, etc. You can uninstall all the packages on your > system, but the FreeBSD base system will still remain. This allows > FreeBSD to boot normally without any packages installed. Very well you mentioned this - this difference between "base OS" and "installable packages" is one of the most important features of FreeBSD to me. Having said this, all the additional software (from ports or from packages) reside within /usr/local; everything outside /usr/local belongs to the OS. This means you can # rm -rf /usr/local # mtree -f /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist and then start installing the software you want. The base system won't be affected at all. # cd /usr/ports// # make install package clean or # pkg_add -r So you end up only with the things you intendedly install (including the needed dependencies). This is the way I did setup a 5.X system many years ago which died this month due to a problem killing various inodes... :-( > I recommend you uninstall all packages (with 'pkg_delete -a', or > 'pkg_delete -av' if you want to watch all the files being deleted), > then install only what you need from the Ports tree. You can, of course, just deinstall the packages you know you won't need, but as you said, if there are more than 250 of them installed (related to X, maybe Gnome or KDE, too), it's easier to invest some time and build from scratch, just as you need. > Your DNS server should probably not require any packages to be > installed, as DNS server software (BIND) is provided with the FreeBSD > base system. See? Everything there from the base install. :-) > But that really depends what your requirements are. Exactly. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 17:48:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05A81065688 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=qCeVrO=YH=webzone.net.au=andrewd@smtp.webzone.net.au) Received: from smtp.webzone.net.au (smtp.webzone.net.au [210.8.36.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9216A8FC1A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=qCeVrO=YH=webzone.net.au=andrewd@smtp.webzone.net.au) Received: from ppp121-45-156-210.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net ([121.45.156.210] helo=[192.168.202.99]) by smtp.webzone.net.au with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KNACD-00015B-Qm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:08:14 +0930 Message-ID: <488CB283.80400@webzone.net.au> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:08:11 +0930 From: Andrew D User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AUTH-WEBZONE: andrewd@webzone.net.au successfully authed as username:andrewd Subject: pptp and routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:48:42 -0000 G'Day all, got a freebsd Box FreeBSD gw.ade.eltrak.com.au 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 9 03:46:03 CST 2008 root@gw.ade.eltrak.com.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ELKERN i386 that has a poptop server on it. When a client logs in they get authed fine and get issued an IP. However when connecting or pinging no data comes back from the server. arpproxy is set, as is forwarding. net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 net.link.ether.inet.proxyall: 1 The server for some reason puts a route for the client ip on the ethernet interface rather than the tun interface the client has come in on. /etc/ppp/ppp.conf loop: set timeout 0 set log phase chat connect lcp ipcp command set device localhost:pptp set dial set login set ifaddr 10.10.1.5 10.10.1.20-10.10.1.60 255.255.255.0 add default HISADDR set server /tmp/loop "" 0177 loop-in: set timeout 0 set log phase lcp ipcp command allow mode direct pptp: load loop disable pap enable passwdauth disable ipv6cp enable proxy accept dns enable MSChapV2 enable mppe disable deflate pred1 deny deflate pred1 set dns 10.10.1.5 set device !/etc/ppp/secure /etc/ppp/secure #!/bin/sh exec /usr/sbin/ppp -direct loop-in /usr/local/etc/pptpd.conf localip 10.10.1.5 remoteip 10.10.1.20-60 pidfile /var/run/pptpd.pid noipparam debug $ ifconfig fxp0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 00:04:ac:98:d2:c6 inet 10.10.1.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active re0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=399b ether 00:40:ca:23:ed:5f media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: no carrier lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1500 inet 10.8.0.1 --> 10.8.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 775 tun1: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1398 inet 10.10.1.5 --> 10.10.1.34 netmask 0xffffff00 Opened by PID 14740 $ netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 10.10.1.254 UGS 0 29107 fxp0 10.8.0.0/24 10.8.0.2 UGS 0 215 tun0 10.8.0.2 10.8.0.1 UH 2 45 tun0 10.10.1.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 10.10.1.5 00:04:ac:98:d2:c6 UHLW 2 322 lo0 10.10.1.34 10.10.1.5 UGH 0 0 fxp0 10.10.1.254 00:1e:be:97:95:23 UHLW 2 0 fxp0 10.10.2.0/24 10.8.0.2 UGS 0 918 tun0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 208 lo0 As you can see the client (10.10.1.34) is routed on the fxp0 interface rather than the tun1. Anyone got any Ideas? Cheers cya Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 18:59:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5832A106566B; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A2D8FC17; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6RIxL4M034019; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:59:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6RIxKB2034016; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:59:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:59:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080727205835.Y33967@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080725114402.G5386@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graid3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:59:35 -0000 >> why it can't be say 5 disks+parity? > > The reason is in the definition on "RAID 3", which says the updates to the > RAID device must be atomic. In some ideal universe, RAID 3 is implemented in > hardware and on individual bytes, but here we cannot write to the drives in > units other than sectorsize and sectorsize is 512 bytes. OK i understand - the RAID sectors must be 2^something, so amount of drives must be 2^something+1. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 19:00:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DB71065671 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522AC8FC2F for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6RIxxe8034032; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:00:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6RIxxND034029; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:59:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:59:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jason Lenthe In-Reply-To: <488BE7AE.1010201@comcast.net> Message-ID: <20080727205940.E33967@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <488BE7AE.1010201@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:00:15 -0000 > ad5: 476940MB at ata2-slave SATA150 > ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting? still more that actually drive can get from media (about 100MB/s) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 19:27:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E93E1065674 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8748FC16 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KNBtX-0002f1-Nu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:04 +0000 Received: from 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.0.85.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:03 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:26:52 +0200 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <488BBCFD.1090309@FreeBSD.org> <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA30002210583BB6DF766214C" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-0-85-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:27:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA30002210583BB6DF766214C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 > On Jul 26, 2008, at 19:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >=20 >> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite >> extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in >> FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deem= ed >> important enough that it is now used by other projects too. >=20 > while in general I like the new approach, this problem has been a=20 > killer. I did find a number of errors in my own code where I was not=20 > allocating enough space for some things. Those showed up instantly wit= h=20 > 7.0 and were easy to fix. As Kris said, you can run the 6.x binary on 7.x with compatibility=20 libraries. This is the worst long-term option but it *will* gain you the = 7.x kernel (with all its benefits like multi-CPU support, new drivers,=20 etc.) with the old allocator from the old libraries. This will be hard=20 to maintain but it will work. --------------enigA30002210583BB6DF766214C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjMv/ldnAQVacBcgRApe9AJ4ko3rLVMx0jrXFP7NllCmdYs1t6QCgqa2u zg8MYrcCLA3WEYc8q7QbchU= =ElVm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA30002210583BB6DF766214C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 19:51:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288351065672 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511348FC14 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6RJotm0034235; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:50:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6RJosUa034232; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:50:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:50:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080727214912.U34219@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:51:07 -0000 > /etc/malloc.conf. The default for that file is to not exist. The man page > does not indicate which settings are used in that situation. After reading > through it I get the feeling that the default settings for D and M are 'dM'. > Hence, to return to the older malloc aproach to see if the problems go away I > would need to set "Dm". But some of the descriptions seem to indicate that > might not be correct. What are the default settings? no idea. anyway - if this makes any non-performance difference to your programs - it's something wrong with it by design. it should not. if you need to manage memory your way, just use sbrk only and then manage it your way - as i do in most of my programs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 20:49:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0E41065682 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zajoho@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199798FC1D for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zajoho@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so903981hue.8 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:49:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9TyENZDDuUoI/1HH3a3echtqRCEy39VQZqpIqRSwoHs=; b=p4FcSrDF6whPhCIVqapckDFoQpykTUJtStfukD8toQZyPd72RyaB0vN+7d9W+q/htF jY3F+tPbGJVuMhQJCzIO8PS2PQUJYj7oafUjLkRPRY8wq8WdskGNW2lh6TgBP3rPLXZB Mbe6Nq5gJW3nm0lTnC/Qf39mB3meefYCfU5Sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vrvA1CVodUEqpw7E2JWtbANdqe8NyIPSItcysEu3ul+kXENV8QiOoo2fvYXD3Ebpqp CqNHYBnmch6X0IhL3+HFl94DSODPSseM0/bbzT+jB4JKRHh99nAMlegYwei5MnOHAIoU pBwTS6xax7bDe6Nt+cuM/tmQsJHrhz6VuKpLg= Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr3852504ebb.132.1217191756322; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.28.10 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:49:16 +0200 From: "Bruno Joho" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080724135553.025d3660@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080724135553.025d3660@mail.computinginnovations.com> Cc: Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Sendmail local LAN delivery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:49:18 -0000 Hi Derek thanks for the reply. My intention was to deliver the mails between the workstations on the LAN directly. Every Workstation on the LAN would have an appropriate cf file which forwards mails with a destination on the WAN - to the WAN-Smarthost, any mail going to a destination from inside the LAN would be delivered directly to the destination host without involving a (LAN) smarthost. Is that possible somehow? Thanks for your help Bruno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 21:22:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3201065678 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E568FC13 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6RLMF2w035101; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:22:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080727161405.026938f8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:22:13 -0500 To: "Bruno Joho" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080724135553.025d3660@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080726-1, 07/26/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7853/Sun Jul 27 14:51:50 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6RLMF2w035101 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: Sendmail local LAN delivery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:22:32 -0000 At 03:49 PM 7/27/2008, Bruno Joho wrote: >Hi Derek > >thanks for the reply. >My intention was to deliver the mails between the workstations on the >LAN directly. Every Workstation >on the LAN would have an appropriate cf file which forwards mails with >a destination on the WAN - to the >WAN-Smarthost, any mail going to a destination from inside the LAN >would be delivered >directly to the destination host without involving a (LAN) smarthost. >Is that possible somehow? > >Thanks for your help > >Bruno That scenario is possible, but you may still need DNS MX records to point to the smart host as well. You can have multiple MX records for a domain (or subdomain) where the value field is higher for a farther away mail server, or for a secondary mail server. Sendmail uses DNS to figure routing along with the internal configuration file UNLESS you specify to sendmail to NOT use DNS. So you have some choices in how you configure sendmail and/or DNS. Also it may help you to test things on one system and bump up the sendmail logging so the /var/log/maillog file has more information. Use the option: -O LogLevel=80 Or some other value than 80. You can add these options to your sendmail flags in /etc/rc.conf -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 21:23:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE16D106564A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.kimbaras@tetraneta.lt) Received: from post.mgbaltic.lt (post.mgbaltic.lt [213.226.167.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D3518FC22 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.kimbaras@tetraneta.lt) Received: (qmail 31043 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2008 20:55:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tornado.mgbaltic.lan) (213.226.167.131) by post.mgbaltic.lt with SMTP; 27 Jul 2008 20:55:09 -0000 From: a.kimbaras@tetraneta.lt To: Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:55:16 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on tornado/MGBaltic(Release 6.5.5|November 30, 2005) at 2008.07.27 23:55:16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Algis Kimbaras is out of the office. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:23:20 -0000 I will be out of the office starting 2008.07.27 and will not return until 2008.07.28. Busiu isvykes nuo 2008-07-28 iki 2008-08-10. I Jusu laiska atsakysiu grizes. Skubiais atvejais prasau kreiptis i Lina Linkaite tel. 8 (5) 2786278 arba e-mail'u l.linkaite@tetraneta.lt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 22:26:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F641065675 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52E758FC0C for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66821 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jul 2008 22:26:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=PpcQsDDPV3WtSkbnhAIJqvr4su9yZ6Exb38mjX78fLntV+PUaMRQlxgo894vY52DQGGQzIto4gJhYPpCF2jMNMtpRpvNTBthSvUryCY4KTCXTSVy2e1fwfcL4Itz4eh9LWPQy+2TQ/CzoXMaN8PAc8gyvy+W6zFgFmvAkc8xSyI=; Received: from [98.169.13.4] by web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:26:10 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:26:10 -0700 (PDT) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <769944.66487.qm@web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: freebsd networking issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ipfreak@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:26:11 -0000 hello: i have two interfaces installed on my freebsd machine (desktop); one is wireless (ath0, facing the internet, 192.168.1.10/24) and another is internal (fxp0, 192.168.2.1/24). the internet facing interface of the freebsd works fine: from my xp laptop (192.168.1.2), i can ping the interface of freebsd (ath0, facing internet, 192.168.1.10). also from the freebsd machine, i can ping the default gateway (192.168.1.1) and get access to internet. but the second interface doesn't work. from the freebsd machine, i can't ping anywhere on the 192.168.2.0/24 except own ip address. with "arp -a" on freebsd, i can only see mac address of own interface (fxp0), but not mac addresses of other machinese on the net 192.168.2.0/24. i connected internet side directly (without ath0) with fxp0 and the interface works fine. the bottom line is: on the net 192.168.2.0/24, i can't see any mac addresses. in the file /etc/rc.conf, i have the line "gateway_enbale="YES"" but i don't think it matters since i have no intention to use the freebsd machine as a router anyway. any ideas? thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 01:24:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400EE1065678 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq.20.drkshadow@spamgourmet.com) Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (gourmet.spamgourmet.com [216.75.35.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEE78FC12 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq.20.drkshadow@spamgourmet.com) Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m6S16k8T025552 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:06:46 GMT Received: (from jqh1@localhost) by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m6S16jN3025498 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:06:45 GMT Received: from cluster1.bresnan.net (cluster1.bresnan.net [69.145.248.58]) by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m6S16hST025208 for <+fbsdq+DrkShadow+be73ae9703.freebsd-questions#freebsd.org@spamgourmet.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:06:43 GMT X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.78 (ClamAV engine v0.93.3) Received: from [69.146.38.125] ([69.146.38.125] verified) by fe-3.cluster1.bresnan.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 796205410 for +fbsdq+DrkShadow+be73ae9703.freebsd-questions#freebsd.org@spamgourmet.com; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:06:34 -0600 Message-ID: <488D1B99.1070902@spamgourmet.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:06:33 -0600 From: fbsdq.20.drkshadow@spamgourmet.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080525) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030808050309040608040302" X-Spamgourmet: Subject: IPSEC: Connections break after 60K when using racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:24:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030808050309040608040302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm having problems trying to set up a VPN. I've followed the instructions in the handbook as exactly as possible many times now, and have determined that racoon is causing connections to die after around 60KB of data has been sent. I base this claim on the fact that I have sent sustained, encrypted traffic with IPSEC using just setkey/ipsec.conf -- that is, everything used up to but excluding racoon. Has anyone encountered the problem? I'm using FreeBSD 7, racoon 0.7, and two VIA C7 boards (1.6GHz) -- tested with and without padlock, though I had the same problem on two intel boxes doing software encryption. Connection by crossover cable or internet has no effect. With the latest testing, both machines had exactly the same hardware and configuration, but again.. I've tried a variety. Aside from the netstat output indicating "xxx outbound packets with no SA available", I don't see anything resembling an error.. and for the output, I can't find any documentation on it, and it all seems to be configured correctly. Help please? Firewall: pf.conf pass in all pass out all ipsec.conf: spdadd 69.146.32.251/32 w.x.y.z/32 ipencap -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/69.146.32.251-w.x.y.z/require; spdadd w.x.y.z/32 69.146.32.251/32 ipencap -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/w.x.y.z-69.146.32.251/require; w.x.y.z is our T1 static IP. 69... is a dynamic IP I was using for testing. Both machines have the same configuration, with IP addresses reversed for the other endpoint. Host A: Internal: 192.168.111.1 External: w.x.y.z --- Host B: External: 69.146.32.251 Internal: 192.168.0.1 Host A: ifconfig gif0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1280 tunnel inet w.x.y.z --> 69.146.32.251 inet 192.168.111.1 --> 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 Host B: ifconfig gif0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1280 tunnel inet 69.146.32.251 --> w.x.y.z inet 192.168.0.1 --> 192.168.111.1 netmask 0xffffff00 gateway, anyway> racoon.conf: path pre_shared_key "/usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt" ; remote anonymous { #exchange_mode main,aggressive,base; exchange_mode main,base; #my_identifier fqdn "server.kame.net"; #certificate_type x509 "foo@kame.net.cert" "foo@kame.net.priv" ; lifetime time 24 hour ; #initial_contact off ; #passive on ; proposal { encryption_algorithm 3des; hash_algorithm sha1; authentication_method pre_shared_key ; dh_group 2 ; } proposal_check strict; } sainfo anonymous { pfs_group 2; lifetime time 12 hour ; encryption_algorithm 3des, cast128, blowfish 448, des, rijndael ; authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1, hmac_md5 ; compression_algorithm deflate ; } psk.txt a.b.c.d myprivky w.x.y.z myprivky Test method: ================================ Host A # ping 192.168.0.1 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=74.516 ms # setkey -D w.x.y.z 69.146.32.251 esp mode=tunnel spi=36840128(0x023222c0) reqid=0(0x00000000) E: 3des-cbc 95afdcdf 8ec36c90 c91388b5 5937999e d6a2db7c 27e5a321 A: hmac-sha1 359d9f19 737936c1 30e211e5 abc887b3 aed79067 seq=0x00000001 replay=4 flags=0x00000000 state=mature created: Jul 28 05:58:02 2008 current: Jul 28 05:58:05 2008 diff: 3(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 05:58:02 2008 hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s) current: 160(bytes) hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes) allocated: 1 hard: 0 soft: 0 sadb_seq=1 pid=3337 refcnt=2 69.146.32.251 w.x.y.z esp mode=tunnel spi=3887055(0x003b4fcf) reqid=0(0x00000000) E: 3des-cbc a732002b 4d9e7dca eacf14b1 9175529f 0157d675 dd9eaa2b A: hmac-sha1 ecdb2d07 ecb1e803 d532d76c be11429f 33c5a5ed seq=0x00000001 replay=4 flags=0x00000000 state=mature created: Jul 28 05:58:02 2008 current: Jul 28 05:58:05 2008 diff: 3(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 05:58:02 2008 hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s) current: 124(bytes) hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes) allocated: 1 hard: 0 soft: 0 sadb_seq=0 pid=3337 refcnt=1 Host B 69.146.32.251 w.x.y.z esp mode=tunnel spi=3887055(0x003b4fcf) reqid=0(0x00000000) E: 3des-cbc a732002b 4d9e7dca eacf14b1 9175529f 0157d675 dd9eaa2b A: hmac-sha1 ecdb2d07 ecb1e803 d532d76c be11429f 33c5a5ed seq=0x00000001 replay=4 flags=0x00000000 state=mature created: Jul 28 05:58:54 2008 current: Jul 28 05:59:28 2008 diff: 34(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 05:58:54 2008 hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s) current: 160(bytes) hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes) allocated: 1 hard: 0 soft: 0 sadb_seq=1 pid=11831 refcnt=2 w.x.y.z 69.146.32.251 esp mode=tunnel spi=36840128(0x023222c0) reqid=0(0x00000000) E: 3des-cbc 95afdcdf 8ec36c90 c91388b5 5937999e d6a2db7c 27e5a321 A: hmac-sha1 359d9f19 737936c1 30e211e5 abc887b3 aed79067 seq=0x00000001 replay=4 flags=0x00000000 state=mature created: Jul 28 05:58:54 2008 current: Jul 28 05:59:28 2008 diff: 34(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 05:58:54 2008 hard: 0(s) soft: 0(s) current: 124(bytes) hard: 0(bytes) soft: 0(bytes) allocated: 1 hard: 0 soft: 0 sadb_seq=0 pid=11831 refcnt=1 ========== Host A # dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 count=300 | nc 192.168.0.1 8000 Host B 66048 bytes transferred in 50.040368 secs (1320 bytes/sec) ======== # setkey -D Host A w.x.y.z 69.146.32.251 seq=0x0000003a diff: 177(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 06:00:32 2008 current: 73360(bytes) allocated: 58 69.146.32.251 w.x.y.z seq=0x0000002c diff: 177(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 06:00:57 2008 current: 4088(bytes) allocated: 44 Host B 69.146.32.251 w.x.y.z seq=0x0000002c diff: 189(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) last: Jul 28 06:01:49 2008 current: 5672(bytes) allocated: 44 w.x.y.z 69.146.32.251 seq=0x0000003a diff: 189(s) hard: 43200(s) soft: 34560(s) current: 71484(bytes) allocated: 58 ====== # netstat -p ipsec -s Host A: 134 outbound packets with no SA available Host B: # netstat -p ipsec -s 19 outbound packets with no SA available 224 mbufs inserted during makespace Racoon debug log: attached, from host B. I've logged on host A in the past and it's approximately the same -- no clear errors. Any help would be appreciated. --------------030808050309040608040302 Content-Type: text/plain; name="racoon-debug.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="racoon-debug.log" Foreground mode. 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.7 (http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 (http://www.openssl.org/) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: Reading configuration from "/usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf" 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_register for AH 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_register for ESP 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_register for IPCOMP 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: reading config file /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: lifetime = 86400 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: lifebyte = 0 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: encklen=0 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: p:1 t:1 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: 3DES-CBC(5) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: SHA(2) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: 1024-bit MODP group(2) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: pre-shared key(1) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: compression algorithm can not be checked because sadb message doesn't support it. 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: getsainfo params: loc='ANONYMOUS', rmt='ANONYMOUS', peer='NULL', id=0 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: getsainfo pass #2 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: parse successed. 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: 69.146.32.251 (re1) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: fe80::1%lo0 (lo0) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: ::1 (lo0) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: 127.0.0.1 (lo0) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: 192.168.0.1 (bridge0) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: my interface: 192.168.0.1 (gif0) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: configuring default isakmp port. 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: 6 addrs are configured successfully 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: 192.168.0.1[500] used as isakmp port (fd=6) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: ERROR: failed to bind to address 192.168.0.1[500] (Address already in use). 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: 127.0.0.1[500] used as isakmp port (fd=7) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: ::1[500] used as isakmp port (fd=8) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: fe80::1%lo0[500] used as isakmp port (fd=9) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: INFO: 69.146.32.251[500] used as isakmp port (fd=10) 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: get pfkey X_SPDDUMP message 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: 02120000 0f000100 01000000 332e0000 03000500 04200000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 03000600 04200000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 07001200 02000100 02000000 00000000 28003200 02020000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: get pfkey X_SPDDUMP message 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG2: 02120000 0f000100 00000000 332e0000 03000500 04200000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 03000600 04200000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 07001200 02000200 01000000 00000000 28003200 02020000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: sub:0xbfbfe584: 69.146.32.251/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=4 dir=out 2008-07-28 05:58:46: DEBUG: db :0x2843e078: w.x.y.z/32[0] 69.146.32.251/32[0] proto=4 dir=in 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 104 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000068 0d000038 00000001 00000001 0000002c 01010001 00000024 01010000 800b0001 000c0004 00015180 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 00000014 afcad713 68a1f1c9 6b8696fc 77570100 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: anonymous configuration selected for w.x.y.z[500]. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: INFO: respond new phase 1 negotiation: 69.146.32.251[500]<=>w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=1(sa) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=13(vid) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: total SA len=52 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 00000001 00000001 0000002c 01010001 00000024 01010000 800b0001 000c0004 00015180 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=2(prop) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: proposal #1 len=44 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: transform #1 len=36 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=3DES-CBC 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: pair 1: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 0x28439250: next=0x0 tnext=0x0 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: proposal #1: 1 transform 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: prop#=1, prot-id=ISAKMP, spi-size=0, #trns=1 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: trns#=1, trns-id=IKE 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=3DES-CBC 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: Compared: DB:Peer 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: (lifetime = 86400:86400) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: (lifebyte = 0:0) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: enctype = 3DES-CBC:3DES-CBC 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: (encklen = 0:0) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hashtype = SHA:SHA 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: authmethod = pre-shared key:pre-shared key 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: dh_group = 1024-bit MODP group:1024-bit MODP group 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: an acceptable proposal found. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: agreed on pre-shared key auth. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: new cookie: 835e2082f4c50164 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 52, next type 13 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 16, next type 0 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 104 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 1 times of 104 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 01100200 00000000 00000068 0d000038 00000001 00000001 0000002c 01010001 00000024 01010000 800b0001 000c0004 00015180 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 00000014 afcad713 68a1f1c9 6b8696fc 77570100 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: resend phase1 packet 48a656d56e438a6c:835e2082f4c50164 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 180 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 04100200 00000000 000000b4 0a000084 860cc11e 3396b59e bdc7d95e 4e8dc787 9f64d04b 833bc9a1 04fa39c2 07b766a9 6c2a11ab 1056dc46 8649f49a bba1b703 1365d3c5 9400dbc3 644d6fea c03ab75a dfe13d83 419bae91 6c26272b 51ae2c77 70220a0c c5a73019 682b238f 09f6d741 a7868ed1 935b016b d5cdb435 814d052e fdd25b7a 02c0c9c4 7b4b1791 ea7ca5b0 00000014 ecf1de20 b7694a17 2f111e8c 2fd72b05 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=4(ke) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=10(nonce) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute DH's private. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 54c75c82 5136519f f877aeec ebb7c4ab 5f29b2cb 43e28eb2 a5bcd9b2 890fff4a 0f65f836 2cb652f2 72d5ea99 f9991742 942b8bff 0b7ec1e6 2c6b52e4 5c5995ca 47c105d9 b7d27c3c 92d6fd00 952a441f 70f4c0f5 3c0d1d3c 48ce6ddd 4e714f17 05b6dbbe 8ed7f521 cd79e172 188513a5 e60343b0 d2723dbb 5226ecae d49c0306 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute DH's public. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: a32e23d9 334afdbc 70eed448 3a61f250 d5d0d695 6f198b96 c953f9ad 6650f67f 175047eb cde00bb7 1946e215 b4d1cc9e ecca0fcf 3c8af1d4 a3ee855a 81065b57 17511179 3c9d912f 2e3cef94 e8da7690 12297c18 cd3a19fb 7b282782 49cce2d2 4e864e80 34d4f02f 8e1d8adc 48ae9546 f6ef395b f51eb8f5 f07c50ff 40cceaf4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 128, next type 10 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 16, next type 0 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 180 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 1 times of 180 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 04100200 00000000 000000b4 0a000084 a32e23d9 334afdbc 70eed448 3a61f250 d5d0d695 6f198b96 c953f9ad 6650f67f 175047eb cde00bb7 1946e215 b4d1cc9e ecca0fcf 3c8af1d4 a3ee855a 81065b57 17511179 3c9d912f 2e3cef94 e8da7690 12297c18 cd3a19fb 7b282782 49cce2d2 4e864e80 34d4f02f 8e1d8adc 48ae9546 f6ef395b f51eb8f5 f07c50ff 40cceaf4 00000014 b9f44059 1a7b59be c98244f3 c5c28b01 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: resend phase1 packet 48a656d56e438a6c:835e2082f4c50164 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute DH's shared. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b3733178 54b3e2a5 fd94e055 40082381 4883ba2f 3ed448af bd17d2ed e6fac2a1 4303de72 eac71402 4bd15a32 298717c6 8bd0d2ab 6fbd6b1b a452e007 ad737428 b7830511 85b3229f 94e6cd0a a11360d5 78cccb77 a9383e41 9d97eeea f1d2711b 6600a36a ee1eb94b 79e6ba38 827d8d99 69d9b5b6 dd4a5255 4bd863dd c334c995 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: the psk found. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG2: psk: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG2: 57654172 6556504e 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: nonce 1: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: ecf1de20 b7694a17 2f111e8c 2fd72b05 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: nonce 2: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b9f44059 1a7b59be c98244f3 c5c28b01 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: SKEYID computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: c968ee2a 423d0906 7aad37a3 ad8cd133 74165e67 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: SKEYID_d computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: e02b177e d824ef2b 2a12dfd2 7d294998 2307907d 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: SKEYID_a computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6a9fb4e1 d21e4532 77840eab cc168404 d34ac8de 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: SKEYID_e computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 64170adb d30f0338 9872f25f 29ca89a2 db18052b 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: len(SKEYID_e) < len(Ka) (20 < 24), generating long key (Ka = K1 | K2 | ...) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute intermediate encryption key K1 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 00 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute intermediate encryption key K2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 22321fe2 49601e19 c116a048 066fb0ed f194fc29 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: final encryption key computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: IV computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 75d611fc 2b7a9477 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 68 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 05100201 00000000 00000044 3949ccbe b6702aa8 0e81b968 7c0db561 482aa93c d8b2b7f1 d724632f 6b377f83 b56e89e3 36fcdaf2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin decryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: IV was saved for next processing: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b56e89e3 36fcdaf2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: decrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 75d611fc 2b7a9477 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: decrypted payload, but not trimed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 0800000c 011101f4 ce51cc7a 00000018 68131787 dc799fc2 9de084af 51dbb9a7 81ec8548 ac89c903 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: padding len=4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: skip to trim padding. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: decrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 05100201 00000000 00000044 0800000c 011101f4 ce51cc7a 00000018 68131787 dc799fc2 9de084af 51dbb9a7 81ec8548 ac89c903 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=5(id) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: seen nptype=8(hash) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH received: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 68131787 dc799fc2 9de084af 51dbb9a7 81ec8548 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 860cc11e 3396b59e bdc7d95e 4e8dc787 9f64d04b 833bc9a1 04fa39c2 07b766a9 6c2a11ab 1056dc46 8649f49a bba1b703 1365d3c5 9400dbc3 644d6fea c03ab75a dfe13d83 419bae91 6c26272b 51ae2c77 70220a0c c5a73019 682b238f 09f6d741 a7868ed1 935b016b d5cdb435 814d052e fdd25b7a 02c0c9c4 7b4b1791 ea7ca5b0 a32e23d9 334afdbc 70eed448 3a61f250 d5d0d695 6f198b96 c953f9ad 6650f67f 175047eb cde00bb7 1946e215 b4d1cc9e ecca0fcf 3c8af1d4 a3ee855a 81065b57 17511179 3c9d912f 2e3cef94 e8da7690 12297c18 cd3a19fb 7b282782 49cce2d2 4e864e80 34d4f02f 8e1d8adc 48ae9546 f6ef395b f51eb8f5 f07c50ff 40cceaf4 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 00000001 00000001 0000002c 01010001 00000024 01010000 800b0001 000c0004 00015180 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 011101f4 ce51cc7a 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH (resp) computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 68131787 dc799fc2 9de084af 51dbb9a7 81ec8548 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH for PSK validated. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: peer's ID 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 011101f4 ce51cc7a 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: use ID type of IPv4_address 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: generate HASH_R 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: a32e23d9 334afdbc 70eed448 3a61f250 d5d0d695 6f198b96 c953f9ad 6650f67f 175047eb cde00bb7 1946e215 b4d1cc9e ecca0fcf 3c8af1d4 a3ee855a 81065b57 17511179 3c9d912f 2e3cef94 e8da7690 12297c18 cd3a19fb 7b282782 49cce2d2 4e864e80 34d4f02f 8e1d8adc 48ae9546 f6ef395b f51eb8f5 f07c50ff 40cceaf4 860cc11e 3396b59e bdc7d95e 4e8dc787 9f64d04b 833bc9a1 04fa39c2 07b766a9 6c2a11ab 1056dc46 8649f49a bba1b703 1365d3c5 9400dbc3 644d6fea c03ab75a dfe13d83 419bae91 6c26272b 51ae2c77 70220a0c c5a73019 682b238f 09f6d741 a7868ed1 935b016b d5cdb435 814d052e fdd25b7a 02c0c9c4 7b4b1791 ea7ca5b0 835e2082 f4c50164 48a656d5 6e438a6c 00000001 00000001 0000002c 01010001 00000024 01010000 800b0001 000c0004 00015180 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 011101f4 459220fb 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH (resp) computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b89239ea d6e714bc b554cec7 07ea030e a3a5eb9b 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 8, next type 8 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: add payload of len 20, next type 0 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin encryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: pad length = 4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 0800000c 011101f4 459220fb 00000018 b89239ea d6e714bc b554cec7 07ea030e a3a5eb9b a6d19903 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b56e89e3 36fcdaf2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: save IV for next: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 76737915 8b38ae42 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 68 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 1 times of 68 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 05100201 00000000 00000044 d85b53f6 88714dc6 1d87da51 fa37e765 c3dd8001 01b9f56f 1774c162 e4a7864e 76737915 8b38ae42 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: compute IV for phase2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: phase1 last IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 76737915 8b38ae42 8e4d7ed3 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: phase2 IV computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 7e7b50f3 051b6b7b 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 8e4d7ed3 0000001c 00000001 01106002 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: b7972a50 7bbce940 b5da9e09 23b05b78 1d5cac19 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: begin encryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: pad length = 4 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 0b000018 b7972a50 7bbce940 b5da9e09 23b05b78 1d5cac19 0000001c 00000001 01106002 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 b2c7e403 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 7e7b50f3 051b6b7b 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: save IV for next: 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: d6cba77b 5ac2a34e 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: encrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 84 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08100501 8e4d7ed3 00000054 be1b0d21 cb9eecf9 a7a14926 02b0b9be 27d4dc34 2feae4cd c4652a64 f5496085 179491d6 1deb5146 3490ba75 02f534e3 d6cba77b 5ac2a34e 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: sendto Information notify. 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: IV freed 2008-07-28 05:58:52: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established 69.146.32.251[500]-w.x.y.z[500] spi:48a656d56e438a6c:835e2082f4c50164 2008-07-28 05:58:52: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 564 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08102001 c383cb43 00000234 84550bd5 6e47b2bd d37509e7 ed9224a8 341c41cf 0b4045a1 a4cf202e 81719170 2d79e609 ad956fa9 29b097a3 8ec88b07 67d1ae0b 15b20b1c 5d270bb3 896b3f08 fab86b48 a4462c9e d9048908 e616d7bb 85003694 f420d4d3 4a36613f 2f5a3891 efaeac09 92e98197 49429313 ea4bf456 359749aa a454743d 21fda7fa f3ca4019 f40c31b1 98c2f3a6 3db19efd 4e4b803e 8538e60d 23fdb9ec 3b7093c7 3355a215 81c5e992 a151f376 83b78832 5c76454c a4808747 01dd9ced c0f07cdc 634bac7e 395b9d36 876f5f12 a0b76f60 da12ea24 85fa0333 c40c0e4a e77cd847 12fac3bc 4c4afe6f 93042920 d736eae4 81bdb711 4cfcf0ff fed79678 ae99c248 390de523 712a31dd 5a614bdf e6adeecb 04da3375 3cb202f7 e50b5bf7 2210ba3e 75b9a7b2 af4dd2d3 95a1189a ce78906d da13387b c256fbe0 429d640b 7eb235d0 9ce6373a ff502590 33867363 66a7fdeb 6fb9acb3 eba69bb9 bf857584 bf913af2 5710400e 93f9c8e1 5a554937 19776b23 449fe66b 4b588b13 6084e8a5 e0f651e5 f306d1ad 1bce5736 0cc3eda5 2d1a2012 10fbb2d3 afe3bf2d 75748f66 08592abb 762d8b7b 8a15d9dd ab88f30b 5f5abb86 253d7890 a8f4ca3d 3e61cd30 382f9234 e3ede772 ec2fae87 0bd2192b a08274a9 8fae6d51 44792842 c7cf0973 b699912b dcd85fe9 1bd14ef7 012883da ae02f627 aac7d171 a330eef5 4f86824a d490302d 6b3c398c 72ebe41d 39f7e986 52943cd8 a29b9ad3 12e14984 71aa67fb 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: compute IV for phase2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: phase1 last IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 76737915 8b38ae42 c383cb43 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: phase2 IV computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 1050d01c 76f25c67 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:53: INFO: respond new phase 2 negotiation: 69.146.32.251[0]<=>w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin decryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: IV was saved for next processing: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 12e14984 71aa67fb 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: decrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 1050d01c 76f25c67 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: decrypted payload, but not trimed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 01000018 c6ba0618 c2feac6d ff6a262e e6136d47 f59c5c2a 0a000148 00000001 00000001 0000013c 0103040a 003b4fcf 0300001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 02030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 03060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 03000020 04060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 03000020 05070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050002 80030002 03000020 06070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050001 80030002 0300001c 07020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 08020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 090c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 00000020 0a0c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 04000014 a4898266 1b522452 f9401bbf db67f809 05000084 b1aff46d 35278f9f ccf1fd10 c6ce81c5 17feb23d 3d371d6f c8627f19 b2090f6f db4f13ce 6ad2ecd6 cead6274 ea656754 27d61b38 1af4c0d5 45adcfb9 0e3a6ab0 f39c1c59 b4603f6f 2bee85f7 2148ef51 d6d6c55d caab505d 1b22cc81 7b5db7f8 fc6b7194 04fe901e b6e3b97e 1d65eef2 3297c7a0 51a18155 2027933e bffdbf3c 0500000c 01040000 ce51cc7a 0000000c 01040000 459220fb efeaa690 f59cb307 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: padding len=8 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: skip to trim padding. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: decrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08102001 c383cb43 00000234 01000018 c6ba0618 c2feac6d ff6a262e e6136d47 f59c5c2a 0a000148 00000001 00000001 0000013c 0103040a 003b4fcf 0300001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 02030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 03060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 03000020 04060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 03000020 05070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050002 80030002 03000020 06070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050001 80030002 0300001c 07020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 08020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 090c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 00000020 0a0c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 04000014 a4898266 1b522452 f9401bbf db67f809 05000084 b1aff46d 35278f9f ccf1fd10 c6ce81c5 17feb23d 3d371d6f c8627f19 b2090f6f db4f13ce 6ad2ecd6 cead6274 ea656754 27d61b38 1af4c0d5 45adcfb9 0e3a6ab0 f39c1c59 b4603f6f 2bee85f7 2148ef51 d6d6c55d caab505d 1b22cc81 7b5db7f8 fc6b7194 04fe901e b6e3b97e 1d65eef2 3297c7a0 51a18155 2027933e bffdbf3c 0500000c 01040000 ce51cc7a 0000000c 01040000 459220fb efeaa690 f59cb307 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=8(hash) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=1(sa) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=10(nonce) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=4(ke) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=5(id) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=5(id) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: received IDci2:2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 01040000 ce51cc7a 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: received IDcr2:2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 01040000 459220fb 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: HASH(1) validate:2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: c6ba0618 c2feac6d ff6a262e e6136d47 f59c5c2a 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: c383cb43 0a000148 00000001 00000001 0000013c 0103040a 003b4fcf 0300001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 02030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 03060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 03000020 04060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 03000020 05070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050002 80030002 03000020 06070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050001 80030002 0300001c 07020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 08020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 090c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 00000020 0a0c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 04000014 a4898266 1b522452 f9401bbf db67f809 05000084 b1aff46d 35278f9f ccf1fd10 c6ce81c5 17feb23d 3d371d6f c8627f19 b2090f6f db4f13ce 6ad2ecd6 cead6274 ea656754 27d61b38 1af4c0d5 45adcfb9 0e3a6ab0 f39c1c59 b4603f6f 2bee85f7 2148ef51 d6d6c55d caab505d 1b22cc81 7b5db7f8 fc6b7194 04fe901e b6e3b97e 1d65eef2 3297c7a0 51a18155 2027933e bffdbf3c 0500000c 01040000 ce51cc7a 0000000c 01040000 459220fb 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: c6ba0618 c2feac6d ff6a262e e6136d47 f59c5c2a 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: anonymous configuration selected for w.x.y.z. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: getsainfo params: loc='69.146.32.251', rmt='w.x.y.z', peer='w.x.y.z', id=0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: getsainfo pass #1 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: evaluating sainfo: loc='ANONYMOUS', rmt='ANONYMOUS', peer='ANY', id=0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: getsainfo pass #2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: evaluating sainfo: loc='ANONYMOUS', rmt='ANONYMOUS', peer='ANY', id=0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: selected sainfo: loc='ANONYMOUS', rmt='ANONYMOUS', peer='ANY', id=0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: get a src address from ID payload w.x.y.z[0] prefixlen=32 ul_proto=4 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: get dst address from ID payload 69.146.32.251[0] prefixlen=32 ul_proto=4 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: sub:0xbfbfe308: w.x.y.z/32[0] 69.146.32.251/32[0] proto=4 dir=in 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: db: 0x2843e078: w.x.y.z/32[0] 69.146.32.251/32[0] proto=4 dir=in 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0xbfbfe308 masked with /32: w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x2843e078 masked with /32: w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0xbfbfe308 masked with /32: 69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x2843e078 masked with /32: 69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: sub:0xbfbfe308: 69.146.32.251/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=4 dir=out 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: db: 0x2843e078: w.x.y.z/32[0] 69.146.32.251/32[0] proto=4 dir=in 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: sub:0xbfbfe308: 69.146.32.251/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=4 dir=out 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: db: 0x2843e1a8: 69.146.32.251/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=4 dir=out 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0xbfbfe308 masked with /32: 69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x2843e1a8 masked with /32: 69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0xbfbfe308 masked with /32: w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x2843e1a8 masked with /32: w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: suitable SP found:69.146.32.251/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=4 dir=out 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (proto_id=ESP spisize=4 spi=00000000 spi_p=00000000 encmode=Tunnel reqid=0:0) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: total SA len=324 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 00000001 00000001 0000013c 0103040a 003b4fcf 0300001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 02030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 03060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 03000020 04060000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 03000020 05070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050002 80030002 03000020 06070000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 800601c0 80050001 80030002 0300001c 07020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 0300001c 08020000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050001 80030002 03000020 090c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050002 80030002 00000020 0a0c0000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80060080 80050001 80030002 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=2(prop) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: proposal #1 len=316 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #1 len=28 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #2 len=28 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #3 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #4 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #5 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=448 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #6 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=448 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #7 len=28 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #8 len=28 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #9 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #10 len=32 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pair 1: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393a0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393b0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393b0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393c0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393c0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393d0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393d0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393e0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393e0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393f0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393f0: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439400 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439400: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439410 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439410: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439420 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439420: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439430 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439430: next=0x0 tnext=0x0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: proposal #1: 10 transform 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin compare proposals. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pair[1]: 0x284393a0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393a0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393b0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393b0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393c0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393c0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393d0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393d0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393e0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393e0: next=0x0 tnext=0x284393f0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393f0: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439400 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439400: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439410 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439410: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439420 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439420: next=0x0 tnext=0x28439430 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x28439430: next=0x0 tnext=0x0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=1 trns-id=3DES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=2 trns-id=3DES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=3 trns-id=CAST 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=4 trns-id=CAST 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=5 trns-id=BLOWFISH 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=448 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=6 trns-id=BLOWFISH 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=448 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=7 trns-id=DES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=8 trns-id=DES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=9 trns-id=AES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: prop#=1 prot-id=ESP spi-size=4 #trns=10 trns#=10 trns-id=AES 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=128 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-md5 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: peer's single bundle: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (proto_id=ESP spisize=4 spi=003b4fcf spi_p=00000000 encmode=Tunnel reqid=0:0) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: my single bundle: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (proto_id=ESP spisize=4 spi=00000000 spi_p=00000000 encmode=Tunnel reqid=0:0) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=3DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=CAST encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=BLOWFISH encklen=448 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=DES encklen=0 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-sha) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: (trns_id=AES encklen=128 authtype=hmac-md5) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: matched 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_getspi 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pfkey GETSPI sent: ESP/Tunnel w.x.y.z[0]->69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pfkey getspi sent. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: get pfkey GETSPI message 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG2: 02010003 0a000000 c3913ee6 332e0000 02000100 023222c0 40067315 c0a80001 03000500 ff200000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 03000600 ff200000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pfkey GETSPI succeeded: ESP/Tunnel w.x.y.z[0]->69.146.32.251[0] spi=36840128(0x23222c0) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: total SA len=48 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 00000001 00000001 00000028 01030401 00000000 0000001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=2(prop) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: proposal #1 len=40 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: transform #1 len=28 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=SA Life Duration, flag=0x8000, lorv=43200 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: life duration was in TLV. 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Encryption Mode, flag=0x8000, lorv=Tunnel 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Authentication Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=hmac-sha 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=2 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: pair 1: 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: 0x284393a0: next=0x0 tnext=0x0 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: proposal #1: 1 transform 2008-07-28 05:58:53: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: compute DH's private. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 4676c5a1 12a93911 096c04fa ec462c85 5fc07b77 98405ea6 d8dee1c1 fb110b7d d96122c6 6d96aa69 2eb96fda 2f22c65d 01a233d0 84695c8f ebcd43cc ebda8265 fb5f02eb 0d94b4cf e24b753c 2a56c27a cb38fdcf 0da08d32 01eeca90 493526a4 5cc85f56 f03595f1 b6b51e0b 860348ac 1e384cc6 c33e458a fa3479b2 38efc600 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: compute DH's public. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: b00d6211 ccef6e59 c6e4c673 fca33d40 9a9df177 6f33bc17 e8168ce1 56f8733c 1c5fe2ce 98262923 677d8daa 2b6f33f0 bd5c1b88 ea3a19a6 c629dbd2 a774bbe9 e3a21a47 d313eede 49d0a10d 15ce8d7a d4348347 832ed778 53d0b3ed 7dab2ec9 d06864f4 ffa76ea7 700733b4 fa369b94 805440c2 b33aea30 c728a2e9 318f69c2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 48, next type 10 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 16, next type 4 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 128, next type 5 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 8, next type 5 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 8, next type 0 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: c383cb43 a4898266 1b522452 f9401bbf db67f809 0a000034 00000001 00000001 00000028 01030401 023222c0 0000001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 04000014 b79a9537 6a31fce4 88abce34 cfc9b7d2 05000084 b00d6211 ccef6e59 c6e4c673 fca33d40 9a9df177 6f33bc17 e8168ce1 56f8733c 1c5fe2ce 98262923 677d8daa 2b6f33f0 bd5c1b88 ea3a19a6 c629dbd2 a774bbe9 e3a21a47 d313eede 49d0a10d 15ce8d7a d4348347 832ed778 53d0b3ed 7dab2ec9 d06864f4 ffa76ea7 700733b4 fa369b94 805440c2 b33aea30 c728a2e9 318f69c2 0500000c 01040000 ce51cc7a 0000000c 01040000 459220fb 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 2bebb3b6 0d0581b9 b059c787 db5d1d24 ea0cf3cb 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: add payload of len 20, next type 1 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: begin encryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pad length = 4 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 01000018 2bebb3b6 0d0581b9 b059c787 db5d1d24 ea0cf3cb 0a000034 00000001 00000001 00000028 01030401 023222c0 0000001c 01030000 80010001 8002a8c0 80040001 80050002 80030002 04000014 b79a9537 6a31fce4 88abce34 cfc9b7d2 05000084 b00d6211 ccef6e59 c6e4c673 fca33d40 9a9df177 6f33bc17 e8168ce1 56f8733c 1c5fe2ce 98262923 677d8daa 2b6f33f0 bd5c1b88 ea3a19a6 c629dbd2 a774bbe9 e3a21a47 d313eede 49d0a10d 15ce8d7a d4348347 832ed778 53d0b3ed 7dab2ec9 d06864f4 ffa76ea7 700733b4 fa369b94 805440c2 b33aea30 c728a2e9 318f69c2 0500000c 01040000 ce51cc7a 0000000c 01040000 459220fb 87f8af03 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 12e14984 71aa67fb 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: save IV for next: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 277dad90 b84f707a 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 284 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 1 times of 284 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08102001 c383cb43 0000011c e5bfa25a 2fb8fd22 303a89da 59925f11 ec4ce857 76171050 d60f39dd cfa7a5ea 73e92dba 555c04d3 e1381802 45e915e3 c017b224 2cb913af 4bf8ad04 d958a3a6 8ab6aad4 2c77c030 c30faafc d58d1c05 f9a5502d 49843125 896ab293 5538a697 4a3103c3 14c3e795 4377ee3f ab750c11 178b33be 6c288bbc e2a16b48 bc2e7981 3465e8fb 5faee773 577b28f1 933b2e79 c5814e25 0e0e61ae a57e6aae 3ad47ca3 77ce247a 619b469c a19e15f1 3a7d2ab3 49bd1590 c26ee888 5199b270 f02fdbe4 1b041d71 3f863c17 e99cea33 73fd01ef d1bbb572 29cc73db 34fea434 fa16ee12 7efd29ac 36c9b6e8 c03bde3a 47527452 3e7b55b6 22566570 277dad90 b84f707a 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: resend phase2 packet 48a656d56e438a6c:835e2082f4c50164:0000c383 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 60 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08102001 c383cb43 0000003c 82baf406 4740bf27 add3f3dd cbfb902c e482b2f1 67d86d6d 57bd1701 87a52bca 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: begin decryption. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: IV was saved for next processing: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 57bd1701 87a52bca 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: decrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 277dad90 b84f707a 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: decrypted payload, but not trimed. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 00000018 858586cc 041b5a81 4bfdef57 d6e918a0 03f5e94b 81b881f4 aca3aa07 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: padding len=8 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: skip to trim padding. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: decrypted. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08102001 c383cb43 0000003c 00000018 858586cc 041b5a81 4bfdef57 d6e918a0 03f5e94b 81b881f4 aca3aa07 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: begin. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: seen nptype=8(hash) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: succeed. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: HASH(3) validate:2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 858586cc 041b5a81 4bfdef57 d6e918a0 03f5e94b 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 00c383cb 43a48982 661b5224 52f9401b bfdb67f8 09b79a95 376a31fc e488abce 34cfc9b7 d2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 858586cc 041b5a81 4bfdef57 d6e918a0 03f5e94b 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: compute DH's shared. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 4d72478f e939d367 b558837a f8d10b41 e1aa4af4 285e2ade d1b1f081 3d9fbadd 0934df43 e837ad68 e481eefb b4a00188 676bc4da a7b57312 d2f867a3 a41fbe03 8fd73a5b 11a502a7 7160937f a394fe21 22991e5d 31de0734 512bca88 65562f93 1cd5e9ca 47ae0a35 29483d54 a808a6d3 581494a7 46474e34 26025af3 58a0a6db 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: KEYMAT compute with 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 4d72478f e939d367 b558837a f8d10b41 e1aa4af4 285e2ade d1b1f081 3d9fbadd 0934df43 e837ad68 e481eefb b4a00188 676bc4da a7b57312 d2f867a3 a41fbe03 8fd73a5b 11a502a7 7160937f a394fe21 22991e5d 31de0734 512bca88 65562f93 1cd5e9ca 47ae0a35 29483d54 a808a6d3 581494a7 46474e34 26025af3 58a0a6db 03023222 c0a48982 661b5224 52f9401b bfdb67f8 09b79a95 376a31fc e488abce 34cfc9b7 d2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encklen=192 authklen=160 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: generating 640 bits of key (dupkeymat=4) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: generating K1...K4 for KEYMAT. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 95afdcdf 8ec36c90 c91388b5 5937999e d6a2db7c 27e5a321 359d9f19 737936c1 30e211e5 abc887b3 aed79067 0cc54e82 b895c524 0c9787b2 684b9d03 75609ab4 b36d9454 fda5d5d2 d967822a 0e00aaa2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: KEYMAT compute with 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: 4d72478f e939d367 b558837a f8d10b41 e1aa4af4 285e2ade d1b1f081 3d9fbadd 0934df43 e837ad68 e481eefb b4a00188 676bc4da a7b57312 d2f867a3 a41fbe03 8fd73a5b 11a502a7 7160937f a394fe21 22991e5d 31de0734 512bca88 65562f93 1cd5e9ca 47ae0a35 29483d54 a808a6d3 581494a7 46474e34 26025af3 58a0a6db 03003b4f cfa48982 661b5224 52f9401b bfdb67f8 09b79a95 376a31fc e488abce 34cfc9b7 d2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encklen=192 authklen=160 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: generating 640 bits of key (dupkeymat=4) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: generating K1...K4 for KEYMAT. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: a732002b 4d9e7dca eacf14b1 9175529f 0157d675 dd9eaa2b ecdb2d07 ecb1e803 d532d76c be11429f 33c5a5ed 49c41ccd 45cecd09 7692c101 d544c30e 92caff2c 9a6f1c94 de09b805 9a7b074a 6158f719 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: KEYMAT computed. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: call pk_sendupdate 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_update2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pfkey update sent. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: hmac(sha1) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_add2 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pfkey add sent. 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: get pfkey UPDATE message 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG2: 02020003 14000000 c3913ee6 332e0000 02000100 023222c0 04000303 00000000 02001300 02000000 00000000 00000000 03000500 ff200000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 03000600 ff200000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 04000300 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0a80000 00000000 00000000 00000000 04000400 00000000 00000000 00000000 00870000 00000000 00000000 00000000 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pfkey UPDATE succeeded: ESP/Tunnel w.x.y.z[0]->69.146.32.251[0] spi=36840128(0x23222c0) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Tunnel w.x.y.z[0]->69.146.32.251[0] spi=36840128(0x23222c0) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: get pfkey ADD message 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG2: 02030003 14000000 c3913ee6 332e0000 02000100 003b4fcf 04000303 00000000 02001300 02000000 00000000 00000000 03000500 ff200000 10020000 459220fb 00000000 00000000 03000600 ff200000 10020000 ce51cc7a 00000000 00000000 04000300 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0a80000 00000000 00000000 00000000 04000400 00000000 00000000 00000000 00870000 00000000 00000000 00000000 2008-07-28 05:58:54: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Tunnel 69.146.32.251[0]->w.x.y.z[0] spi=3887055(0x3b4fcf) 2008-07-28 05:58:54: DEBUG: === 2008-07-28 06:02:20: INFO: caught signal 2 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: get pfkey FLUSH message 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: 02090000 02000000 00000000 332e0000 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: flushing all ph2 handlers... 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: got a ph2 handler to flush... 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: getph1byaddr: start 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: local: 69.146.32.251[0] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: remote: w.x.y.z[0] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: p->local: 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: p->remote: w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG2: matched 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: compute IV for phase2 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: phase1 last IV: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 76737915 8b38ae42 89d11331 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: phase2 IV computed: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 90ee1522 a354b8d1 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 89d11331 00000010 00000001 03040001 023222c0 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: fd5a241e 337d9c1f 458952f3 53a8b4be ca4160c0 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: begin encryption. 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: pad length = 8 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 0c000018 fd5a241e 337d9c1f 458952f3 53a8b4be ca4160c0 00000010 00000001 03040001 023222c0 ddcbc0c5 a5aed007 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: encrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 90ee1522 a354b8d1 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: save IV for next: 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: f597d839 4f2382f9 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: encrypted. 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 76 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 1 times of 76 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08100501 89d11331 0000004c 93510f21 583e31a4 c132490d bff9ac9c c118ba5c 91127bfc 6a95eb5e d84f70e9 d8c815cd 4b948da3 f597d839 4f2382f9 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: sendto Information delete. 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: IV freed 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: an undead schedule has been deleted. 2008-07-28 06:02:20: DEBUG: IV freed 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: call pfkey_send_dump 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: compute IV for phase2 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: phase1 last IV: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 76737915 8b38ae42 bffafaa1 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: hash(sha1) 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: phase2 IV computed: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: ddcd366e 7ee272fc 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: HASH with: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: bffafaa1 0000001c 00000001 01100001 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: hmac(hmac_sha1) 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: HASH computed: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: bcc8943f f5f065e0 2d407673 a927c731 d95da7a0 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: begin encryption. 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: pad length = 4 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 0c000018 bcc8943f f5f065e0 2d407673 a927c731 d95da7a0 0000001c 00000001 01100001 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 cde59303 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: encryption(3des) 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: with key: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 6d64b34e b5017daa 32825cfd 29128ca0 c47e1cb3 22321fe2 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: encrypted payload by IV: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: ddcd366e 7ee272fc 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: save IV for next: 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 16a7ea82 126ed5d8 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: encrypted. 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 84 bytes from 69.146.32.251[500] to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: sockname 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: send packet from 69.146.32.251[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: 48a656d5 6e438a6c 835e2082 f4c50164 08100501 bffafaa1 00000054 54474457 93d42ae6 d17f783c bae3331e 69589ea0 170bba8e 65f391c6 dc4c146e 33b46f96 e6afa965 72c54ee8 7ca56698 16a7ea82 126ed5d8 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: sendto Information delete. 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: IV freed 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: an undead schedule has been deleted. 2008-07-28 06:02:21: DEBUG: IV freed 2008-07-28 06:02:21: INFO: racoon shutdown --------------030808050309040608040302-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 02:20:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB06B10656C6 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=E8gimY=YI=shell.siscom.net=vogelke@siscom.net) Received: from lamorack.siscom.net (lamorack.siscom.net [209.251.2.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72F68FC12 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=E8gimY=YI=shell.siscom.net=vogelke@siscom.net) Received: from shell.siscom.net ([209.251.2.80]) by lamorack.siscom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1KNI0Z-0001MT-Pg; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:58:43 -0400 Received: by shell.siscom.net (Postfix, from userid 2198) id 9D754115529; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:58:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil (Postfix, from userid 32768) id 70030B7B9; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT) To: Giorgos Keramidas In-reply-to: <87y73ohylt.fsf@kobe.laptop> (message from Giorgos Keramidas on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300) Organization: Oasis Systems Inc. X-Disclaimer: I don't speak for the USAF or Oasis. X-GPG-ID: 1024D/711752A0 2006-06-27 Karl Vogel X-GPG-Fingerprint: 56EB 6DBF 4224 C953 F417 CC99 4C7C 7D46 7117 52A0 Message-Id: <20080728015539.70030B7B9@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT) From: vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vogelke+software@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:20:42 -0000 >> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >> Doug Hardie wrote: D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with versions D> 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite complex D> and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The D> problems only occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy load. D> The developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on FreeBSD D> 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money because D> of it. >> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >> Giorgos Keramidas said: G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite G> extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in FreeBSD G> 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed important G> enough that it is now used by other projects too. I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under heavy load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I used. I finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one application: http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if you want to give it a try. -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company vogelke at pobox dot com http://www.pobox.com/~vogelke And God said, "Let there be vodka!" And saw that it was good. Then God said, "Let there be light!" And then said, "Whoa - too much light." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 04:14:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D821065670 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6928FC24 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl121-117.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.240.117]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6S4Dq0r000732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:59 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6S4DqYK009550; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6S4Doll009549; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: vogelke+software@pobox.com References: <20080728015539.70030B7B9@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:50 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20080728015539.70030B7B9@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> (Karl Vogel's message of "Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87k5f6odc1.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6S4Dq0r000732 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.798, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.60, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:14:05 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT), vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >>> Doug Hardie wrote: > > D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with > D> versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is > D> quite complex and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a > D> typical use. The problems only occur reasonably randomly and only > D> under quite heavy load. The developer is looking into it, but the > D> problem only occurs on FreeBSD 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In > D> the meantime I am losing money because of it. > >>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >>> Giorgos Keramidas said: > > G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone > G> quite extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use > G> it in FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way > G> was deemed important enough that it is now used by other projects > G> too. > > I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under > heavy load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I > used. I finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one > application: > > http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ > > This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if > you want to give it a try. I'm not sure how similar the two problems are. I quite frankly know _very_ little of what the original problem was, other than "I am encountering issues where values just seem to arbitrarily change". Memory exhaustion is a potential problem with almost any sort of allocator that fragments memory in any way, but random corruption of user data is probably a different issue :/ If you have some sort of description of the workload that triggered the memory exhaustion with jemalloc (the current malloc implementation in FreeBSD), it's probably a good idea to talk to Jason Evans about it (his email is "jasone" at FreeBSD.org). He may be able to help you tune malloc or even make changes to the system version of malloc that make it less vulnerable to this sort of problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 07:18:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAA5106566C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from bene2.itea.ntnu.no (bene2.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E36F8FC08 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC2C90002 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C8A90001 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 81462 invoked by uid 88); 28 Jul 2008 09:18:17 +0200 Received: from maren.math.ntnu.no (HELO weld.ej2.thelosingend.net) (129.241.211.48) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:17 +0200 Message-ID: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:23 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bene2.itea.ntnu.no Cc: Subject: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:18:35 -0000 Hi, list! I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and don't give that address away to someone else. I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a client asks for an IP address? sv. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 07:48:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55818106566B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38208FC1E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so3737482fgb.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jaIgZnXjR78v08xV0uaSoInJmSUsOhLvDz34dA/plVg=; b=q97A7vs48UgVLTL4IHlkMPnp4kIa1WtRge649i67sYwfM7Fp7t+VsFmVyJWkvz9U+4 rBTAmVwEV+RPA6njPToeJHi8VT7SzZul0q75P6sIp6WQpwfJdr0oBAIj/Pii8hnDYTCK K/sQi44o7dHhY/xCN6YNxuQnyMRJ4SGIJBI3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uG9uWzHjm+ozHVnMutxd0A8dcRWyomZLxCv4ZcY8/rKh6DDy8Ubt9jbPNW03zDu/BU 2mXVj+zrtyt4VoaTUd1mbLKWg0fjgVKHnLG/CwmICiT8fFGz85cqnXSXxQ3YKUVpvADp UknnYIJmLLpOgrsLUd/pq9QU8dY2A7xl1e3oY= Received: by 10.86.94.11 with SMTP id r11mr2352296fgb.0.1217231302741; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [85.72.121.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm8995197fge.3.2008.07.28.00.48.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:48:19 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> In-Reply-To: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:48:24 -0000 Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > Hi, list! > > > I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the > internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up > by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got > from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. > > Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of > DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip > address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp > server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and > don't give that address away to someone else. > You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your static IP address to someone else. Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP will never assign. > I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, > but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. > 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) > Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I > understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the > "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the > Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online > advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves > the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on > my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a > client asks for an IP address? > You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it permanently and assign this function to a machine. The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides IP address): - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to ISP servers. - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. 10.0.0.1) If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 07:52:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B58106564A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744348FC0A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (f054097167.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.97.167]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1KNNXA161A-0000qd; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:47 +0200 Message-ID: <488D7AD0.5090804@janh.de> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:48 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen References: 488C37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19qh3KCaURcRbpdHcA3+LUdDM76kz1mG9+lrbu 7gjO0UZfP4pp7G3jV3CmhZlhu3VDBwwDFQPWnJbjdimPhEQlWg L/U1yzQREZwb3vhQIA2lA== Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:52:57 -0000 Svein wrote: > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? Yes, there is a problem. See my posting here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html Unfortunatelly, I have not got an answer, but it is obvious packages using this new symbol must fail: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-May/091586.html The question is, if other package may fail as well. I have had one more error that went away after recompiling a STABLE package: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2008-July/020520.html I do not know if this is related, though. If you find out more, please, let me know. Cheers, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 08:05:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364251065682 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B64E8FC1E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so5157748rvf.43 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JX1mmpHIDZ1NvyIcd6ULSSmlGmJcd3dvwO5UrZehdO0=; b=IHCvKrcY2IAY2u7xkRWiE7O04YRZYEWMx/qEEp1WIwwsNBtGxHUPo6LTPYlzuB1MrZ xgSG1sdlGgWllv6+ZvLJANKyQDWZWluQdjUmODOe/lVKBYDBWqJDu6CM8kieyusvbq2F 0XpAOTvucarVs5+ggkqHxby2D7CSmkWGExuEU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=eF/9cgNiqnPF/UYgpFku7edqazOT9NpNza1aVfnwjidEZ0gKc7vva1wYx5Qq2OBOWV g9xu50fOCJTqXBnkY4bb+K5R2rJaW4Ln5o+ttb1hA8PyMWVu9hydtavep4TqbN7ZUQ6J 7BlbVGhcuVTTmLXrNnirCo1Q2aqqgzN8jFbBo= Received: by 10.114.200.2 with SMTP id x2mr4584333waf.79.1217232355524; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.15.4 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:35:55 +0530 From: Subhro To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:05:56 -0000 Just to add to that suggestion, if you have a separate DHCP server, make sure your router works as a DHCP client for the internal network as well. You should be able to do that by telnetting into the management port. You may use a serial cable as well. This is required in order to get the NAT working properly. Thanks Subhro On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >> >> Hi, list! >> >> >> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >> >> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >> don't give that address away to someone else. >> > > You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your static > IP address to someone else. > Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to narrower > values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something like > exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP will never > assign. >> >> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >> > > 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is 255.255.255.0, but > check your router or your clients) > >> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >> client asks for an IP address? >> > > You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it permanently > and assign this function to a machine. > The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides IP > address): > > - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) or > its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address as a > DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to ISP > servers. > - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. > 10.0.0.1) > > If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info as > well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Kar Software Engineer Dynamic Digital Technologies Pvt. Ltd. EPY-3, Sector: V Salt Lake City 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 08:57:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B871065674 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from bene2.itea.ntnu.no (bene2.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D211E8FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055AF90006 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A04990002 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 17769 invoked by uid 88); 28 Jul 2008 10:56:40 +0200 Received: from maren.math.ntnu.no (HELO weld.ej2.thelosingend.net) (129.241.211.48) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:47 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bene2.itea.ntnu.no Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:57:00 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >> don't give that address away to someone else. > > You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your > static IP address to someone else. > Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to > narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something > like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP > will never assign. Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate also wants a static address. >> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. > > 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is > 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse scheme for the static adresses. Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps them out of its dhcp address pool. > You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it > permanently and assign this function to a machine. > The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides > IP address): > > - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) > or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address > as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to > ISP servers. > - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. > 10.0.0.1) > > If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info > as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. sv. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 09:42:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433921065678 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B687D8FC13 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so6017626ika.3 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HKAakiQyxgb+Oui+tvjL+dth/hceB1a3WgCAQwAwZ0Y=; b=Ea7MFV5C4RiPdKSZWUWY9oBTBNuf+9hEvsGvRfqh0KRgfDuOwq24frdIQpLLZEPpZJ Y6WsLkxx1VOxuVCWGxecpoUG2it75lB0LnOpUkmZF/6U0+AdTWzz7a22s/bE47Uv6nE/ TEmwwBUin2Gz/Az37sMhCEGvs22NzUFs4wGEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K1wFdjQlOu5C9G5huiz1dtNfPArFDkmFwAfTIGMDQWmj0Ug3CLJB7W+1lNXLA7CSQE dKJioJhFamouGEqGPb4CduE4kCvmsiCp3oacBEk7T06XurBewcIz1hFqpnocOXdqc2ka XfgzJXWWVFUdkQAlPXaUdvEcHZkHNf8qvTqOQ= Received: by 10.210.65.2 with SMTP id n2mr5633475eba.145.1217238177146; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshua.freebsdgr.org ( [85.72.79.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z40sm19408443ikz.7.2008.07.28.02.42.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:42:52 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> In-Reply-To: <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:42:59 -0000 Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>> >> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >> static IP address to someone else. >> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something >> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >> will never assign. >> > > Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this > range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still > doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is > pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 > > I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate > also wants a static address. > > What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. I would also try a factory reset or firmware upgrade of the router. I have been using a Speedtouch 500 series for years, and never had any problems with settings not getting registered. AFAIR the 585 has one of the new web interfaces and it is kind of confusing. I found the 500 easier to use. >>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>> >> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) >> > > You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space > available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse > scheme for the static adresses. > Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses from this space. > Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router > figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps > them out of its dhcp address pool. > > > >> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >> IP address): >> >> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >> ISP servers. >> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >> 10.0.0.1) >> >> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >> > > So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the > router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? > Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static configuration. > Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router > dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient > doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. > > > sv. > Not sure about this, sorry. However, don't expect much more than IP/Netmask, DNS Server, Gateway from a simple router. These should not be difficult to configure in isc-dhcp3 (net/isc-dhcp3-server). Have a look at this article: http://www.howtoforge.com/dhcp_server_linux_debian_sarge It is linux oriented, but very easy to adjust for FreeBSD. You will also need to add: option domain-name-servers 10.0.0.1; to set the DNS server address to your clients. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 09:59:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674D71065672 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from bene2.itea.ntnu.no (bene2.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ED28FC0C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891E890002 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id CE9F490003 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 46087 invoked by uid 88); 28 Jul 2008 11:59:38 +0200 Received: from maren.math.ntnu.no (HELO weld.ej2.thelosingend.net) (129.241.211.48) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:38 +0200 Message-ID: <488D988D.10901@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:41 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bene2.itea.ntnu.no Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:59:57 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >> >> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >> also wants a static address. > > What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I > could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to > a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) > Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet > can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses > from this space. Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp range as it was. >> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? > > Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway > to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to > think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static > configuration. Ok, I will look into this. Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, and more. How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you go the isc dhcp route? Thank you very much for your help so far! sv. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:25:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A524A106566B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223168FC21 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so3794865fgb.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kK/mo9Bn3i2Pk9BfKw+CW2Hxf9+4NZjqEbTaTyA3WlA=; b=YApcmSyqARuvMmrdCDsM9H2MZ8v1Y9WIwO9TcJtcj9wQxaqixFv5Wu1sMG9zwBgE1w dN/fJoC/WHNE8Z5v21NqW/tuTPU7KkkTOXWxEUvDKdeS9FRgsyhoVKdxaV4ccaI1d1oa ZPFsd9sDpNuI1uOv1chHTPWMskx1HOS+oC0xg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tbTSkrpss+pceUTdiZgtQA1vXrniBN58UHVuHs9j9a4jF73KxirECboHpjKu+jVzad +OhXSWEOKVmfmIegv+lnA8Yiwjj6HFrHcu5ZJf3zpPcUXMkTzlDWpVMJBcK8zAXbxFCQ en8ozq+y1ky2zk6dq66qICY1thzf3BX8wkvSA= Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr2427861fga.61.1217240742710; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshua.freebsdgr.org ( [85.72.79.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm16006672fge.3.2008.07.28.03.25.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488D9EA3.4010503@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:25:39 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen References: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> <488D988D.10901@lvor.halvorsen.cc> In-Reply-To: <488D988D.10901@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:44 -0000 Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>> >>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>> also wants a static address. >>> >> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I >> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to >> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. >> > > I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just > keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I > seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. > > (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) > Well, a netmask of 255.255.254.0 should give you 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.1.254 host addresses. 10.0.1.1 is within range, it should work. > > >> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >> from this space. >> > > Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp > range as it was. > > > The DHCP range you are assigning is a subset of what you allowed with the netmask, thus it is valid. >>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >>> >> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway >> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static >> configuration. >> > > Ok, I will look into this. > > Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far > more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch > server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I > can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". > Ah, yes completely forgot the speedtouch has a telnet interface as well. I messed with it a few times myself, mostly for fun ;) > This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config > files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can > create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as > paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value > as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, > and more. > > How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are > these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? > > Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try > to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you > go the isc dhcp route? > > > Thank you very much for your help so far! > > > sv. > > I have only done PXE with Windows servers, and it has been quite some time - cannot remember the details. I certainly would not advise you to use the router for this - even if it is possible it has several drawbacks. - You will, sooner or later, change the router and your new one may not have the capability - You will spend a probably unreasonable amount of time trying to make it work - and it may not even succeed - Learning how to perform this on FreeBSD will help you apply it in many other situations. I would definitely go the isc-dhcp route. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:28:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972D8106567D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (thavinci.za.net [196.211.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358328FC08 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (localhost.thavinci.za.net [127.0.0.1]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD1D1EE81D; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0200 (SAST) Received: from thavinciPC (unknown [192.168.12.110]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA0F1EE804; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0200 (SAST) From: "Marcel Grandemange" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01c8f09a$002bf610$0083e230$@za.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acjwmf2qxi6Zr2oJRQS8Osqp5YSjHA== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za Subject: wget vs fetch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:00 -0000 I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even building ports. ALL transfers that are FTP fail. Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES And here is the strange thing.. Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for wget once again) And here is the crux. I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this makes me think fetch is broke somehow. How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing with msg: Try `wget --help' for more options. => Attempting to fetch from http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. wget: invalid option -- Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... Thankx ahead! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 10:28:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7BE1065676 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (thavinci.za.net [196.211.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B774D8FC28 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (localhost.thavinci.za.net [127.0.0.1]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E971EE820; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:29:17 +0200 (SAST) Received: from thavinciPC (unknown [192.168.12.110]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77661EE821; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:29:17 +0200 (SAST) From: "Marcel Grandemange" To: Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acjwmf2qxi6Zr2oJRQS8Osqp5YSjHAAAp0lg Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za Subject: wget vs fetch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:56 -0000 I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even building ports. ALL transfers that are FTP fail. Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES And here is the strange thing.. Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for wget once again) And here is the crux. I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this makes me think fetch is broke somehow. How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing with msg: Try `wget --help' for more options. => Attempting to fetch from http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. wget: invalid option -- Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... Thankx ahead! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 11:44:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE385106564A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (thavinci.za.net [196.211.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5888FC19 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thavinci@thavinci.za.net) Received: from thavinci.za.net (localhost.thavinci.za.net [127.0.0.1]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEED1EE81D; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:44:38 +0200 (SAST) Received: from thavinciPC (unknown [192.168.12.110]) by thavinci.za.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0521EE804; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:44:38 +0200 (SAST) From: "Marcel Grandemange" To: "'Sergey Zaharchenko'" References: <000f01c8f09a$002bf610$0083e230$@za.net> <20080728103442.GA37504@shark.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080728103442.GA37504@shark.localdomain> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: <004a01c8f0a7$326df210$9749d630$@za.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcjwneaiIJUB3mfCQQqgQ4gTN0Ot7gACT4Zw Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: wget vs fetch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:44:15 -0000 Thank You, Worked Perfectly! Saved My Life ;> -----Original Message----- From: Sergey Zaharchenko [mailto:doublef-ctm@yandex.ru] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:35 PM To: Marcel Grandemange Subject: Re: wget vs fetch Hello Marcel! Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:09:16PM +0200 you wrote: > Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing > with > msg: > > > > Try `wget --help' for more options. > > => Attempting to fetch from http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. > > wget: invalid option -- > > Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... You might want to add `DISABLE_SIZE=YES' to your /etc/make.conf, as the fetch's -S option confuses wget. FWIW I use that in connection with `FETCH_CMD=wget -c --passive-ftp' in make.conf and it has been working for a long time for me. -- DoubleF No virus detected in this message. Ehrm, wait a minute... /kernel: pid 56921 (antivirus), uid 32000: exited on signal 9 Oh yes, no virus:) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 13:22:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6566E1065677 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from t1088.8com.gr (t1088.8com.gr [89.163.145.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40118FC15 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from John ([83.235.249.6]) by t1088.8com.gr (IceWarp 9.1.0) with SMTP id IUK60835 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:08:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: "John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ]" To: References: <20080728120020.5E74E10656BE@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:42 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 Subject: 'help' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:22:29 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 3:00 PM Subject: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 2 > Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: malloc options (Karl Vogel) > 2. Re: malloc options (Giorgos Keramidas) > 3. Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) > 4. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) > 5. Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports > (Jan Henrik Sylvester) > 6. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Subhro) > 7. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) > 8. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) > 9. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) > 10. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) > 11. wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) > 12. wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) > 13. RE: wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT) > From: vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) > Subject: Re: malloc options > To: Giorgos Keramidas > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20080728015539.70030B7B9@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> > >>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >>> Doug Hardie wrote: > > D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with > versions > D> 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite > complex > D> and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The > D> problems only occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy > load. > D> The developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on > FreeBSD > D> 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money > because > D> of it. > >>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >>> Giorgos Keramidas said: > > G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite > G> extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in > FreeBSD > G> 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed > important > G> enough that it is now used by other projects too. > > I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under heavy > load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I used. I > finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one > application: > > http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ > > This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if > you > want to give it a try. > > -- > Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company > vogelke at pobox dot com http://www.pobox.com/~vogelke > > And God said, "Let there be vodka!" And saw that it was good. Then God > said, "Let there be light!" And then said, "Whoa - too much light." > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:50 +0300 > From: Giorgos Keramidas > Subject: Re: malloc options > To: vogelke+software@pobox.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <87k5f6odc1.fsf@kobe.laptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT), vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl > Vogel) wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >>>> Doug Hardie wrote: >> >> D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with >> D> versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is >> D> quite complex and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a >> D> typical use. The problems only occur reasonably randomly and only >> D> under quite heavy load. The developer is looking into it, but the >> D> problem only occurs on FreeBSD 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In >> D> the meantime I am losing money because of it. >> >>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >>>> Giorgos Keramidas said: >> >> G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone >> G> quite extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use >> G> it in FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way >> G> was deemed important enough that it is now used by other projects >> G> too. >> >> I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under >> heavy load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I >> used. I finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one >> application: >> >> >> http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ >> >> This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if >> you want to give it a try. > > I'm not sure how similar the two problems are. I quite frankly know > _very_ little of what the original problem was, other than "I am > encountering issues where values just seem to arbitrarily change". > > Memory exhaustion is a potential problem with almost any sort of > allocator that fragments memory in any way, but random corruption of > user data is probably a different issue :/ > > If you have some sort of description of the workload that triggered the > memory exhaustion with jemalloc (the current malloc implementation in > FreeBSD), it's probably a good idea to talk to Jason Evans about it (his > email is "jasone" at FreeBSD.org). He may be able to help you tune > malloc or even make changes to the system version of malloc that make it > less vulnerable to this sort of problem. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:23 +0200 > From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Subject: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, list! > > > I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the > internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up > by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got > from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. > > Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of > DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip > address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp > server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and > don't give that address away to someone else. > > I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, > but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. > > Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I > understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the > "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the > Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online > advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves > the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on > my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a > client asks for an IP address? > > > sv. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:48:19 +0300 > From: Manolis Kiagias > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >> Hi, list! >> >> >> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >> >> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >> don't give that address away to someone else. >> > > You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your > static IP address to someone else. > Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to > narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something > like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP > will never assign. >> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >> > > 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is > 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) > >> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >> client asks for an IP address? >> > > You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it > permanently and assign this function to a machine. > The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides > IP address): > > - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) > or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address > as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to > ISP servers. > - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. > 10.0.0.1) > > If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info > as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:48 +0200 > From: Jan Henrik Sylvester > Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports > To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Cc: questions-list freebsd > Message-ID: <488D7AD0.5090804@janh.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Svein wrote: > > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a > > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest > > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? > > Yes, there is a problem. See my posting here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html > > Unfortunatelly, I have not got an answer, but it is obvious packages > using this new symbol must fail: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-May/091586.html > > The question is, if other package may fail as well. > > I have had one more error that went away after recompiling a STABLE > package: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2008-July/020520.html > > I do not know if this is related, though. > > If you find out more, please, let me know. > > Cheers, > Jan Henrik > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:35:55 +0530 > From: Subhro > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: "Manolis Kiagias" > Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , > questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Just to add to that suggestion, if you have a separate DHCP server, > make sure your router works as a DHCP client for the internal network > as well. You should be able to do that by telnetting into the > management port. You may use a serial cable as well. > > This is required in order to get the NAT working properly. > > Thanks > Subhro > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Manolis Kiagias > wrote: >> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >>> >>> Hi, list! >>> >>> >>> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >>> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >>> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >>> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >>> >>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>> >> >> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >> static >> IP address to someone else. >> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >> narrower >> values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something like >> exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP will >> never >> assign. >>> >>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>> >> >> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is 255.255.255.0, >> but >> check your router or your clients) >> >>> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >>> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >>> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >>> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >>> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >>> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >>> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >>> client asks for an IP address? >>> >> >> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >> permanently >> and assign this function to a machine. >> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >> IP >> address): >> >> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >> or >> its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address as a >> DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to ISP >> servers. >> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >> 10.0.0.1) >> >> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >> as >> well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > Subhro Kar > Software Engineer > Dynamic Digital Technologies Pvt. Ltd. > EPY-3, Sector: V > Salt Lake City > 700091 > India > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:47 +0200 > From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: Manolis Kiagias > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>> don't give that address away to someone else. >> >> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >> static IP address to someone else. >> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something >> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >> will never assign. > > Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still > doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is > pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 > > I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate > also wants a static address. > >>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >> >> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) > > You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space > available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse > scheme for the static adresses. > > Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router > figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps > them out of its dhcp address pool. > > >> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >> IP address): >> >> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >> ISP servers. >> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >> 10.0.0.1) >> >> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) > > So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the > router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? > > Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router > dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient > doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. > > > sv. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:42:52 +0300 > From: Manolis Kiagias > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> >>>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>>> >>> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >>> static IP address to someone else. >>> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >>> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something >>> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >>> will never assign. >>> >> >> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >> >> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >> also wants a static address. >> >> > > What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I > could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to > a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. > I would also try a factory reset or firmware upgrade of the router. I > have been using a Speedtouch 500 series for years, and never had any > problems with settings not getting registered. AFAIR the 585 has one of > the new web interfaces and it is kind of confusing. I found the 500 > easier to use. > >>>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>>> >>> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >>> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) >>> >> >> You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space >> available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse >> scheme for the static adresses. >> > > Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet > can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses > from this space. > >> Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router >> figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps >> them out of its dhcp address pool. >> >> >> >>> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >>> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >>> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >>> IP address): >>> >>> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >>> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >>> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >>> ISP servers. >>> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >>> 10.0.0.1) >>> >>> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >>> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >>> >> >> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >> > > Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway > to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to > think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static > configuration. > >> Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router >> dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient >> doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. >> >> >> sv. >> > > > Not sure about this, sorry. However, don't expect much more than > IP/Netmask, DNS Server, Gateway from a simple router. These should not > be difficult to configure in isc-dhcp3 (net/isc-dhcp3-server). > > Have a look at this article: > > http://www.howtoforge.com/dhcp_server_linux_debian_sarge > > It is linux oriented, but very easy to adjust for FreeBSD. > You will also need to add: > > option domain-name-servers 10.0.0.1; > > to set the DNS server address to your clients. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:41 +0200 > From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: Manolis Kiagias > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D988D.10901@lvor.halvorsen.cc> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>> >>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>> also wants a static address. >> >> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I >> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to >> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. > > I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just > keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I > seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. > > (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) > > >> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >> from this space. > > Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp > range as it was. > > >>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >> >> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway >> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static >> configuration. > > Ok, I will look into this. > > Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far > more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch > server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I > can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". > > This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config > files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can > create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as > paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value > as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, > and more. > > How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are > these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? > > Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try > to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you > go the isc dhcp route? > > > Thank you very much for your help so far! > > > sv. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:25:39 +0300 > From: Manolis Kiagias > Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE > To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488D9EA3.4010503@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> >>>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>>> >>>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>>> also wants a static address. >>>> >>> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I >>> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to >>> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. >>> >> >> I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just >> keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I >> seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. >> >> (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) >> > > Well, a netmask of 255.255.254.0 should give you 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.1.254 > host addresses. > 10.0.1.1 is within range, it should work. >> >> >>> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >>> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >>> from this space. >>> >> >> Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp >> range as it was. >> >> >> > > The DHCP range you are assigning is a subset of what you allowed with > the netmask, thus it is valid. > >>>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >>>> >>> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway >>> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >>> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static >>> configuration. >>> >> >> Ok, I will look into this. >> >> Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far >> more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch >> server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I >> can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". >> > > Ah, yes completely forgot the speedtouch has a telnet interface as well. > I messed with it a few times myself, mostly for fun ;) > >> This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config >> files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can >> create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as >> paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value >> as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, >> and more. >> >> How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are >> these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? >> >> Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try >> to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you >> go the isc dhcp route? >> >> >> Thank you very much for your help so far! >> >> >> sv. >> >> > > > I have only done PXE with Windows servers, and it has been quite some > time - cannot remember the details. > I certainly would not advise you to use the router for this - even if it > is possible it has several drawbacks. > > - You will, sooner or later, change the router and your new one may not > have the capability > - You will spend a probably unreasonable amount of time trying to make > it work - and it may not even succeed > - Learning how to perform this on FreeBSD will help you apply it in many > other situations. > > I would definitely go the isc-dhcp route. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:09:16 +0200 > From: "Marcel Grandemange" > Subject: wget vs fetch > To: > Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za > Message-ID: <000f01c8f09a$002bf610$0083e230$@za.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 > > > > It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even > building ports. > > ALL transfers that are FTP fail. > > > > Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. > > > > http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ > > ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ > > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES > > > > And here is the strange thing.. > > Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. > > The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried > leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for > wget > once again) > > > > And here is the crux. > > > > I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this > makes me think fetch is broke somehow. > > How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? > > > > > > Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing with > msg: > > > > Try `wget --help' for more options. > > => Attempting to fetch from > http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. > > wget: invalid option -- > > Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... > > > > > > > > Thankx ahead! > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:28:27 +0200 > From: "Marcel Grandemange" > Subject: wget vs fetch > To: > Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 > > > > It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even > building ports. > > ALL transfers that are FTP fail. > > > > Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. > > > > http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ > > ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ > > FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES > > > > And here is the strange thing.. > > Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. > > The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried > leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for > wget > once again) > > > > And here is the crux. > > > > I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this > makes me think fetch is broke somehow. > > How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? > > > > > > Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing with > msg: > > > > Try `wget --help' for more options. > > => Attempting to fetch from > http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. > > wget: invalid option -- > > Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... > > > > > > > > Thankx ahead! > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:43:47 +0200 > From: "Marcel Grandemange" > Subject: RE: wget vs fetch > To: "'Sergey Zaharchenko'" > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <004a01c8f0a7$326df210$9749d630$@za.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Thank You, Worked Perfectly! > Saved My Life ;> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergey Zaharchenko [mailto:doublef-ctm@yandex.ru] > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:35 PM > To: Marcel Grandemange > Subject: Re: wget vs fetch > > Hello Marcel! > > Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:09:16PM +0200 you wrote: > >> Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing >> with >> msg: >> >> >> >> Try `wget --help' for more options. >> >> => Attempting to fetch from > http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. >> >> wget: invalid option -- >> >> Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... > > You might want to add `DISABLE_SIZE=YES' to your /etc/make.conf, as the > fetch's -S option confuses wget. FWIW I use that in connection with > `FETCH_CMD=wget -c --passive-ftp' in make.conf and it has been working for > a > long time for me. > > -- > DoubleF > No virus detected in this message. Ehrm, wait a minute... > /kernel: pid 56921 (antivirus), uid 32000: exited on signal 9 Oh yes, no > virus:) > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 2 > ************************************************* > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3302 (20080728) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 13:41:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2573D1065677 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC528FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so2129971tid.3 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:41:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d76A2+nUB3Cs7ZBC1SyrhXrihY66TX6TB3k0d/Lj0wA=; b=vXO585fC2EpJDiHAjt+HywZwBnrv7+ncAS6CKdLakQVwjv4jUvi93LqgYiEVQUA+rz VrunxsCQ8LpGV98ykmoAkHU89QKSTn/PJ420YmKuAveeznVvCV8yzcUOrkC+DFiexDcw myXcarL99CC8IlcSpEu8Bs1PRuu5bzhf2UsuU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SMF+yiUadpzGj9lqd4j3NpAcU9P+W64tEHOVD8NpZrGexQrLcYuqFjVlEfJFAzxG0p ctrAkOZBYVeWV7knG6xqvpLuqJZjACLtJ4zOGHPYTRETZN3RsBzf/xdtFZoYeaUQnaKx RXgTJQ904HJSP+4NPpdtIuqGiq/2DvdG90gDw= Received: by 10.110.26.20 with SMTP id 20mr5981840tiz.20.1217250964096; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [221.223.113.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a14sm9622466tia.0.2008.07.28.06.16.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:16:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:15:53 +0800 From: vardyh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:41:53 -0000 Hi all. I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added 'console="comconsole"' to /boot/loader.conf and I got 'hptrr: no controller detected.' on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the 'console=xxx'. And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? I will very appreciate for your help :> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 14:32:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEB91065671 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torbjorn@nextline.no) Received: from mxmain.nextline.no (mxmain.nextline.no [82.134.6.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5BB8FC1E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torbjorn@nextline.no) Received: from [10.0.1.79] (gateway.nextline.no [82.134.6.100]) by mxmain.nextline.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388B9EAA34; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <488DD36B.8000300@nextline.no> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:51 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torbj=F8rn?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Racoon not identifying host specified in config file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:32:46 -0000 Hello, everyone .. Some quick information about the software in use: Jul 28 15:51:42 fw0 racoon: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.7 (http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net) Jul 28 15:51:42 fw0 racoon: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 (http://www.openssl.org/) I'm having a problem with my IPSec configuration. On one side, everything works out pretty nice. On the other side, racoon is making bad noises about not finding a correct configuration. "ERROR: couldn't find configuration." However, if I kill racoon, and run it in the foreground with debug output on, I get some more information. 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: === 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: 100 bytes message received from 81.167.211.58[57413] to 85.200.211.69[500] 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: ba9d946f 3cf4cf90 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000064 0d000034 00000001 00000001 00000028 01010001 00000020 01010000 800b0001 800c04b0 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 00000014 afcad713 68a1f1c9 6b8696fc 77570100 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: no remote configuration found. 2008-07-16 16:06:27: ERROR: couldn't find configuration. The configuration is pretty straight forward. # cat racoon.conf path pre_shared_key "/var/etc/psk.txt"; path certificate "/var/etc"; remote 81.167.211.58 { exchange_mode main; my_identifier address "85.200.211.69"; peers_identifier address 81.167.211.58; initial_contact on; support_proxy on; proposal_check obey; proposal { encryption_algorithm 3des; hash_algorithm sha1; authentication_method pre_shared_key; dh_group 2; lifetime time 2400 secs; } lifetime time 2400 secs; } sainfo address 85.200.211.64/29 any address 192.168.100.0/24 any { encryption_algorithm 3des,blowfish,cast128,rijndael,rijndael 256; authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1,hmac_md5; compression_algorithm deflate; lifetime time 1200 secs; } Here is the weird thing; if I change that remote stanza to read remote anonymous { blah; } then everything works out nice, racoon even tells me it uses the anonymous stanza for that correct IP. 2008-07-16 16:11:06: DEBUG: anonymous configuration selected for 81.167.211.58. So, to me this seems really odd, how come racoon isn't picking up that stanza when configured for that specified IP ? Using the remote stanza is not what I really want .. So, does anyone have any ideas on what is going on here ? Using tcpdump I can see that it is in fact 81.167.211.58 that is coming through to racoon, on port 500/UDP. Thanks for a great product, by the way. -- Torbjørn / Nextline From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 15:31:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E7B1065675 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F808FC27 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7AA145963; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:12:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:12:10 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 6qqAj/zK5hWDJ7YfyGqzm2X4aIPSVvm0LDEqxRjINAvo 1217257930 Received: from hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1403313A1B; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:12:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Jeffrey Goldberg To: Jan Henrik Sylvester In-Reply-To: <488D7AD0.5090804@janh.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:12:09 -0500 References: 488C37AD.50305@lvor.halvorsen.cc <488D7AD0.5090804@janh.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:31:25 -0000 On Jul 28, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > Svein wrote: > > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a > > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest > > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? > > Yes, there is a problem. See my posting here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html > > Unfortunatelly, I have not got an answer, but it is obvious packages > using this new symbol must fail: I recently discovered this through a blunder of my own. I accidently "updated" a 7-STABLE machine to 7-RELEASE, and discovered, among some other problems, that sudo failed with the same error you report. (I've now put a link to USE-THIS-SUPFiLE to stable-supfile in /usr/ local/etc/cvsup to avoid the blunder in the future.) -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 16:30:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567E41065678 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EEE8FC2E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1297355ywe.13 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:30:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=/bCoap5LKkfqZo0ZMEpaeZ8sXK7TfcwO8Bq64z+ylCY=; b=JW+SqAtcpbsORwSH0W6Dqci9PGPqpZb5KwmAQRTaILql56KBD2UYWp9V/wchCIaDdv MRLqwYWx8cFNOtkvw0iDryv/QEz896QOusgpg5BI83yaC2d6QmVFlQPD3SSo7l8xXRrc h17sW8kWxevaQjeS/AqR5vYX3wXTEg7r0vTHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=sBWyb/+NcddzXBwj9w4r5glGVjupWhBaPgWLHHPChqTa0P4xprSIAiRxMgwZkt6kuD CG7Lp2HsItJ3AG/rASmZ81lCQFMqhLucNFj5vO0XTGnaauW2LWOjHZo8g2HuhzZWCynZ i2jljg38O8657oaRqBSnLfy1+i8sWcMITq/+0= Received: by 10.100.173.9 with SMTP id v9mr6230212ane.155.1217262611844; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.124.5 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90807280930tc9f5bdbqadc9c79362e1a39a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:30:11 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "Kevin Kinsey" In-Reply-To: <488A366A.4090901@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <539c60b90807241547x6abefbaepc8ce9a84784b44d5@mail.gmail.com> <48891697.707@daleco.biz> <539c60b90807241729y6d88e899g5d2acd739c6ad65e@mail.gmail.com> <488A366A.4090901@daleco.biz> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e9c9a822612ac203 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: new vanilla system fails to install many packages/ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:30:13 -0000 On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Steve Franks wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >>> >>> Steve Franks wrote: >>>> >>>> I must be missing something obvious. About 25% of my dependencies >>>> fail to install with errors like: >>>> >>>> "install-info: /usr/local/info/dir: empty file" >>>> "pkg-add: command 'install-info --quiet /blah.info' failed" >>>> >>>> system is 7.0/i386 >>>> >>>> Steve >>> >>> "info" is GNU-related. Any reason that GNU-stuff, esp. >>> "info", wouldn't have been installed/built thus far? >>> (I dunno, but, maybe a csup with the GNU stuff rejected >>> or commented out ...) >>> >> >> All I did was a "developer" (not x developer) sysinstall off 7.0 disk >> 1. No tweaking, hacking, or extra packages until I got a clean boot >> onto the new disk. I'm somewhere between user and power user. I have >> 5 running freebsd systems under my belt, and was going to do my laptop >> (I've given up on it several times already - bloody compaq). >> >>> And anything these ports have in common (assuming they're >>> all GNU for starters). They aren't Linuxolator stuff? >>> >> >> Seems to me, they all use gnuinfo instead of manpages? I don't even >> know what gnuinfo is, nor linuxulator. >> > > Right, GNU programs may have manpages, but they also have > "info" pages which were developed by GNU as a replacement > for the UNIX manual (I'm assuming based on past reading ... > memory ain't all it used to be). > > "Linuxulator" or however it's spelled is just a colloquialism > for the FreeBSD linux emulation. > > I've got few guesses for ya. "Developer" package has documentation, > correct? Or not? > > What's "ls -ld /usr/local/info" give? > >> (!) Bison won't even install (makes fine, but install fails), and >> that's pretty darn basic, no? >> >> Steve > > Yup, 'tis. Tho' I figure someday BSD'ers would like to have > their own implementation. Again, just a guess. > > KDK > -- > When all else fails, EAT!!! > Well, No idea what the problem was, but portupgrade -aO ... seems to have made it go away. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 16:35:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA12106567A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7048FC1B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so1475187wxd.7 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=8IQ3VZ74mHalV/3KP693Apo6fYHdS22Hhmo+xKPXJDI=; b=vjEF8LnQrrZN3hpox9lWKTbX4yHZCNWfLm0Q4FO0rbxVBBuC0nkulMBBBnJcjqXkBc ryEsUwmsjx1i8HqrntKbU16pcN/NB7TLXNcjCEt0ncMSdNP0ivRhGn5cykLwIIwZxNCP qf2KNesBTgvJRxLA8zJsWlQIz/b59ZprglkIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :x-google-sender-auth; b=koq1bGwlSYDMrTs3m9KTgHuG3RbWhlMaMpDTpKBn+xsrVoM8+2AuTF5PSmJcFGBh7K reXYvmWlnKV3eqBfDeEqAyyBEmGheiRNBGxp/5JU3oMBlvizm79j5KAMwVBjbUjxKEJr b4jlNWoQfRh66qD4KbtQ9mcsXE74GbAjA9VBE= Received: by 10.100.172.17 with SMTP id u17mr8718434ane.28.1217262917726; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.124.5 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90807280935i50041623pe54b6ad65d5b89b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:35:17 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: a2ef830d28b8ba8d Subject: 'stray irq7's cause hang? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:35:18 -0000 I've got a new system that hangs after about 2 hours - no ctrl-alt-esc, not ctrl-alt-Fn, no ctrl-alt-delete. I tried hints.0.apic.disabled="YES" (that's apic, not acpi) (or whatever the correct syntax from the handbook is), but I still get the hang, and the stray irq 7's. As far as I can see, there's no other dmesg output related. Ideas? Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 16:41:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BC51065679 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@oak-wood.co.uk) Received: from ash.oak-wood.co.uk (ash.oak-wood.co.uk [62.3.200.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC818FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:41:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@oak-wood.co.uk) Received: by ash.oak-wood.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 80) id 215CCBC0AA; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:23:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host213-106-252-209.no-dns-yet.ntli.net (host213-106-252-209.no-dns-yet.ntli.net [213.106.252.209]) by imp.oak-wood.co.uk (Horde) with HTTP for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:23:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:23:04 +0100 From: Chris Hastie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.1) Subject: Cleaning data off a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:41:32 -0000 I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make sure I don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this removes the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what ever I do from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP console access. Thanks -- Chris Hastie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:11:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CD1106567B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C208FC17 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5622BB57 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.1 (20080629) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kCFPwp30nwxf for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9577A2BB3D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:53 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:11:00 -0000 Hello folks, I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an amd64 =20= install. It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it > =3D=3D=3D> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed = under /=20 > usr/lib32. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. I don't know how to install such library=85 What should I do ? =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:12:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96561106566B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewlylegould@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410238FC1E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewlylegould@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so3381576pyb.10 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:12:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer :subject:content-transfer-encoding:references:message-id :content-type:mime-version:date:cc; bh=F4sRiNW3D8TXg2x1YkIMzeTJ0QJUqdyeuJHcJN+ASBA=; b=F0R/iOCb9h8ggITkMp1I6jewcrK3qK7x/gLOeYgy/KZh5EQKdZhrGznLJLRUKUbACz 6KLtTzeqUKTgx18TqiQOhQvbE8uq4VF2QjXDUKZ7HQB98Bunp5XZ40WEqovYg4/9XliE lQaE1Sbw1JbveqDxpgO5qVdwLXa2DSm7Ig0IQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer:subject:content-transfer-encoding :references:message-id:content-type:mime-version:date:cc; b=ZomNPkR5qLHqgtMVNb9zjihmD6YKAvgij3jbAcR96fwmP0hg8VTrHfNwAgXes0p0L8 NVdeGDs08Zybm9ryskJH8V6HlCMm9upQZErLEKCaUjOXNXyvGVBF3PkKMzz4ndrLuY/0 +j+Du6E2buIvO4nxjoZVrW6cUUtqmRhOy2EPo= Received: by 10.64.242.5 with SMTP id p5mr10141300qbh.5.1217265162488; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.57.55.224? ( [32.148.60.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f77sm3500580pyh.15.2008.07.28.10.12.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:12:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Chris Hastie In-Reply-To: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (4A102) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 4A102) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:12:25 -0500 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:43 -0000 On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:23, Chris Hastie wrote: > I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to > make sure I > don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is > the best > way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if > this removes > the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what > ever I do > from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP > console > access. > > Thanks > > -- > Chris Hastie Is there anyone onsite that you could trust to run DBAN (Derik's Boot And Nuke)? Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:15:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA97A1065682 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADFA8FC12 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6SHEqmp005865; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:14:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m6SHEqmp005865 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217265299; bh=izahLiQ1V2RCHU SrNd4I1AjKBDqRTaESmqUkdchLcpQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Mon,=2 028=20Jul=202008=2018:14:45=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20vardyh=20|CC:=20FreeBSD-questions@freebs d.org|Subject:=20Re:=20No=20controller=20detected=20when=20boot=20F reeBSD=207.0|References:=20<488DC689.2090102@gmail.com>|In-Reply-To :=20<488DC689.2090102@gmail.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Conte nt-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20pro tocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"-------- ----enigE20D3B8BC3D4BE4858128755"; b=Fm5RoODfi1YaXLfty2IUPI7XhKsUGR c5lWRzcQpZd3oO8mC3FKzRXOZjqgRmmdKXK4b1TlUVQHUQKfVV6aUvBIF+SNSHfAS/d tKH2T54SxHNkSi0AGYmk4odB3vSKr0fa/n++xdYjIesvnnFwW6fDHVXgwiVPwpZiWRn rysgDNs= Message-ID: <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:14:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vardyh References: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE20D3B8BC3D4BE4858128755" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:14:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93.3, clamav-milter version 0.93.3 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:15:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE20D3B8BC3D4BE4858128755 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable vardyh wrote: > Hi all. > I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added > 'console=3D"comconsole"' > to /boot/loader.conf and I got > 'hptrr: no controller detected.' > on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the=20 > 'console=3Dxxx'. > And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? > I will very appreciate for your help :> This is just the driver for the HighPoint Rocket Raid controller being a bit too verbose. It's detected that you don't have anything compatible= with hptrr(4) and (unlike the usual behaviour of most Raid Controller drivers (or drivers for any sort of hardware really)) it considers this=20 fact to be of such vital importance that it really had to print out something on the console. Needless to say such behaviour has already bee= n=20 quashed in 7-STABLE and will not appear in 7.1-RELEASE. In other words, it's harmless and you can just ignore it. =20 I suspect that this output wasn't actually triggered by your changing the console setting -- there's no conceivable way changing one should affect the other -- but that changing the way the boot messages are=20 displayed has managed to draw your attention to it. You probably had it=20 before but never noticed. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE20D3B8BC3D4BE4858128755 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiN/owACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy3BQCfdP0S7tosbmcIOGgDg/UhlYnP mloAoJKEGzw3ngFJtpRGlFkm+JQdsSLe =+ito -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE20D3B8BC3D4BE4858128755-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:16:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CFB1065683 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F138FC22 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A862BB69 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.1 (20080629) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ELeFa2vv95EV for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 710542BB68 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <91610C8C-EAC6-49C0-9CAB-D5836592A08E@todoo.biz> From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20080727131744.GA71110@ozzmosis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:58 +0200 References: <0956648E-F93F-40EC-A565-17875757531F@todoo.biz> <20080727131744.GA71110@ozzmosis.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies[SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:16:00 -0000 I have opted for the: pkg_delete -a Which has done a great job cleaning everything. Only had to "make clean" in one of the port directory to properly =20 recompile all needed apps. As I had configured root to use /usr/local/bin/bash had to take care =20 to change that with vipw before doing the uninstall / reinstall. Took me half a day for three servers=85 But at least I have a very clean = =20 install with 30 ports instead of 250 !! Thanks everybody for your wise answers. Le 27 juil. 08 =E0 15:17, andrew clarke a =E9crit : > On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd (bsd@todoo.biz) wrote: > >> I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large =20 >> scale DNS >> server. >> I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X? >> >> This has been useless!! >> >> I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! > > He probably just went with the defaults. > >> Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without >> breaking the system? >> What would you suggest? >> >> Like removing X and It's dependencies? >> >> >> I can also remove all apps in the port tree and recompile only the =20= >> one >> needed? >> >> What's best what do you suggest. > > FreeBSD provides a "base system" with software such as a SSH daemon, > Sendmail, BIND, etc. You can uninstall all the packages on your > system, but the FreeBSD base system will still remain. This allows > FreeBSD to boot normally without any packages installed. > > I recommend you uninstall all packages (with 'pkg_delete -a', or > 'pkg_delete -av' if you want to watch all the files being deleted), > then install only what you need from the Ports tree. > > Your DNS server should probably not require any packages to be > installed, as DNS server software (BIND) is provided with the FreeBSD > base system. But that really depends what your requirements are. > > Regards > Andrew =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:29:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4471D106566C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5590C8FC15 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6SHT9ls044377; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6SHT9k0044374; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris Hastie In-Reply-To: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> Message-ID: <20080728192801.X44373@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:20 -0000 > don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best > way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this removes > the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what ever I do > from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP console > access. remove all your files, then cat /dev/zero >file on every partition From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:37:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E815C1065671 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D868FC0C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6SHbOQr066879; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:37:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6B78FBAA3; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:37:24 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Chris Hastie Message-ID: <20080728173724.GA19106@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:37:27 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Chris Hastie wrote: > I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make su= re I > don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the b= est > way to remove all data from the hard drive?=20 Remove the harddive and move a seriously strong magnet over it. This will render the drive unreadable and useless, since it will also destroy the servo control data used for locating the tracks. > I have no problem if this removes the OS along the way, but ideally I > would like to be able to do what ever I do from an SSH session. The security/wipe port comes to mind. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiOA9QACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWQrwCgrDBRF7AAO2gG6MTAL4WqOXVX dOcAnj5DHjqrjU9hri8NL6GqAYZqVY4s =etIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:45:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F69106564A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnatola@familycareintl.org) Received: from mail.familycareintl.org (mail.familycareintl.org [68.167.21.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467DB8FC08 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnatola@familycareintl.org) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:45:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E9703639@www.fcimail.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: OT: Custmoize VNC Thread-Index: Acjw2al/o8l0jAhjTV+bYX9KoJ9JRQ== From: "Jean-Paul Natola" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Subject: OT: Custmoize VNC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:45:05 -0000 I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to = customize vnc but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside = the lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will = automatically, upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # = etc..) I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't bookmark = the page, any help would be appreciated TIA JP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:48:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBB3106566C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from hrimail.hri.res.in (hrimail.hri.res.in [210.212.50.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D988FC17 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from ipc2.mri.ernet.in (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by hrimail.hri.res.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6674B97EAF for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:50:16 +0530 (IST) Received: from ipc2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipc2 (Postfix) with SMTP id 19F8119CE8 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:42:41 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (riemann.mri.ernet.in [192.168.3.122]) by ipc2.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA7A14B89 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:42:40 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6SH5cm4008915 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:35:38 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu@riemann.mri.ernet.in) Received: (from raghu@localhost) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m6SH5RLu008914; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:35:27 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu) From: "N. Raghavendra" To: FreeBSD Users Questions X-Organization: Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) X-Address: Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India X-URL: http://www.mri.ernet.in/ and http://www.retrotexts.net/ X-Phone: +91 (532) 2667 509, 2667 318, 2667 578, 2567 746, 2567 747 X-Fax: +91 (532) 2667 576, 2567 748, 2567 444, 2568 036 X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x03618806 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: C75D D0AF 457E 7454 BEC2 37AD C6E1 0407 0361 8806 X-OpenPGP-Public-Key-Available-At: http://www.keyserver.net/ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:35:27 +0530 Message-ID: <86fxpuym5k.fsf@riemann.mri.ernet.in> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: LispWorks Personal on FreeBSD 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "N. Raghavendra" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:48:19 -0000 Recently I had some difficulty in installing the Common Lisp implementation LispWorks Personal 5.1 on FreeBSD 7, and am posting my experience here. It may be useful to others, if any, interested in running this CL implementation on FreeBSD 7. The problem was due to the fact that LW depends on several libraries from FreeBSD 5 and 6. Following suggestions on the LW mailing list, the right installation sequence seems to be: 1. Ensure that the kernel options `COMPAT_FREEBSD5' and `COMPAT_FREEBSD6' are on. 2. Install the ports `misc/compat5x' and `misc/compat6x'. 3. Install the package `compatXm-6.3_1.tgz'. 4. Install the package `lispworks-personal-5.1.tgz'. The packages in 3 and 4 are available from the LispWorks FTP server. There's more information in the LW Knowledge Base article at http://www.lispworks.com/kb/67634814074628b180257490005cb9d3.html and in the LW mailing list thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.lispworks.general/8422 which also describes some minor tweaking of LD_LIBRARY_PATH that was needed. Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra | http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute | http://www.mri.ernet.in/ See message headers for contact and OpenPGP information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 17:51:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF21065674 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [64.81.218.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1680B8FC42 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com) Received: (qmail 60978 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Jul 2008 18:57:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local) (kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 28 Jul 2008 18:57:19 -0000 Message-ID: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:51:04 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pci compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:57 -0000 hi all... i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at the time of pci compliance scanning? i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself on that machine and didn't find anything interesting. but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for said "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". anybody knows what does that mean? thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:01:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D216B1065681 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C2B8FC1F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4E82BBA5 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:01:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.1 (20080629) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jrCq7qeW+dy1 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29E522BB77 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:01:14 +0200 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Re: amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:01:16 -0000 Ok, After digging a little bit more into the code, It seems that It was =20 due to rar decompile which is a 32bit ports; I uncommented the rar options for this port and It went ok. I would still be interested in a more detailed answer to my own =20 question regarding 32/64 bit compatibility. Sincerly yours. G.B. Le 28 juil. 08 =E0 19:10, bsd a =E9crit : > Hello folks, > > > I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an =20 > amd64 install. > > It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it > > >> =3D=3D=3D> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed =20= >> under /usr/lib32. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. > > > > I don't know how to install such library=85 > > What should I do ? > > > > =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF > > P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20= > this e-mail" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=20 > " =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:02:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C26F106566B for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341D88FC08 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so4126180ana.13 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=Se4ya4TywgAZaeA/KgwPDFgiLrk6MGpkdEl+/y4TC4o=; b=vC/3tiwudt8uRLm5iKlxJvcL1KgkAp/5i+8CwJ8ryBW/o8PWOe6l3SB4JRTjwiuDSB MBuePKl0DFpNiXrgW6YwX0SmeoqIfW0t0kJBuA6uL9roEhZNyn5k1yj52k5VJUIKMwc2 uHSTT2rbmr4zj86Ws4QOraN79T8PSKZhUyX8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=BJrpgWmtSleoihOHLVVn9fRxTkez2zvvmLld+3CSVfcCv0nYzfr/ZVCYFgdLLwyxcm onJ2FJZONr5tluubS0oWqe3ZTq4XG1NwpdmvqhGEd5ljY6U3Mkj7a1xZDTcmVEXWe+FJ 0tuNVmept0rc0ppbi2D+8DuVuyTvNvEcAA6w4= Received: by 10.100.154.19 with SMTP id b19mr8828455ane.98.1217268160364; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.165.16 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:02:40 +0200 From: "Ross Cameron" Sender: abalour@gmail.com To: "kalin m" In-Reply-To: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 79414590f932480e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pci compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:02:41 -0000 On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: > hi all... > > i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... > > is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at > the time of pci compliance scanning? > i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself on > that machine and didn't find anything interesting. > but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for said > "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". > anybody knows what does that mean? > > thanks... The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make sure u pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:25:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0621065734 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [64.81.218.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A267F8FC1E for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@godfur.com) Received: (qmail 68044 invoked by uid 1008); 28 Jul 2008 19:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local) (kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 28 Jul 2008 19:30:21 -0000 Message-ID: <488E0EF8.4030305@godfur.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:24:56 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za References: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pci compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:25:01 -0000 cool. thanks. i couldn't find anything on google under that name but i've been looking and reading on a lot of documentation on line and print. so i was just asking if there are any things that pertain in particular to the freebsd os that need to be addressed before the scanning. how full of a penetration can you have if (almost) all incoming ports are blocked? thanks.... Ross Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: > > >> hi all... >> >> i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... >> >> is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at >> the time of pci compliance scanning? >> i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself on >> that machine and didn't find anything interesting. >> but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for said >> "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". >> anybody knows what does that mean? >> >> thanks... >> > > > The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. > It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. > > Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make sure u > pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:27:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AE0106564A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvm@CBORD.com) Received: from smssmtp.cbord.com (mx1.cbord.com [24.39.174.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B078FC18 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvm@CBORD.com) X-AuditID: ac1f0165-0000075000000114-28-488e0f792bd0 Received: from Email.cbord.com ([10.1.1.100]) by smssmtp.cbord.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:27:04 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:22:46 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: pci compliance Thread-Index: Acjw2/vXuvyTsVhgT1Gy0MNQ4g513wAAhTdg References: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> From: "Bob McConnell" To: X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: RE: pci compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:27:01 -0000 On Behalf Of Ross Cameron > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: >>=20 >> i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... >> >> is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at >> the time of pci compliance scanning? >> i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself on >> that machine and didn't find anything interesting. >> but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for said >> "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". >> anybody knows what does that mean? >=20 > The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. > It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. >=20 > Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make sure u > pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok How intense depends on which PCI level you are aiming for and which services you will have running on that server. We have completed level 3 for our hosted web servers and firewalls, and are shooting for level 1 by the end of the calendar year. However, I am not yet involved in any of those projects. Bob McConnell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:30:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C835A106567D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from irobot@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.ORG [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683CF8FC15 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from irobot@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (irobot@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.1]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6SIFoeo023582 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:50 GMT Received: from localhost (irobot@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m6SIFo8d008712 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:50 GMT Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Carlos Villalobos To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Component-based Operating System. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:30:42 -0000 Hello, I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just wanted to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on Components. I appreciate your input on this. Thanks irobot@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:58:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7251065689 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C518FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KNXuu-0002Vt-AT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:57:56 +0000 Received: from 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.59.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:57:56 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:57:56 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:57:37 +0200 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9B8910F395BB56D228B78BFC" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9B8910F395BB56D228B78BFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just wante= d=20 > to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on Component= s. >=20 > I appreciate your input on this. "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating system=20 consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the=20 kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomic=20 and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more=20 specific to get a more specific answer. --------------enig9B8910F395BB56D228B78BFC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjhanldnAQVacBcgRApijAKDeuYQiywZk4YVVRNN/myFzCP7QOwCgrL4s b4dnAZPcatWlHN4gZUwDP7g= =3jwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9B8910F395BB56D228B78BFC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 18:58:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E0F106567A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343358FC2A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abalour@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so4194984ana.13 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:58:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=muyb6FPnxFDakTzmfbfTT3l4+rEzPoY33cWVXfJrOKk=; b=JKnBKM5Xpx1OFsWMTVkErd1S0xLP2Jy0hYZL9zL4EkUzUsonMWP8764LlP8pFJtEoB LWhDCNF65ryRspm7ILwu0rLnYfA3DX3b5+LEHFQpHoz+SJGnsKIgpM8BjBPjsZ2TqJaO gim5qVV8sxPVchDgnfpdmR1sWOhtU7TWJzC3E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uMqG//kcHllaSi39kTKwPa9sY3tWcomc9+JxjxOquq4Qh+x8DDf70Vs/V0taNXw+5N bYoOEFjp8oXZ6PhVAgzxG8ygWMIuKIJIm0oxcHZ1XKEtu6R0+graw2boiLm+DELqmE2/ wG4uiBIl6bupuI5PYDbIDW4mIJuwfrL26304Q= Received: by 10.100.240.17 with SMTP id n17mr8890365anh.49.1217271487340; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.165.16 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35f70db10807281158m1fa96b39o3d56f19b772ee6fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:58:07 +0200 From: "Ross Cameron" Sender: abalour@gmail.com To: "kalin m" In-Reply-To: <488E0EF8.4030305@godfur.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> <488E0EF8.4030305@godfur.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3add235b768dca07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pci compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:58:08 -0000 On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, kalin m wrote: > cool. thanks. i couldn't find anything on google under that name but i've > been looking and reading on a lot of documentation on line and print. > so i was just asking if there are any things that pertain in particular to > the freebsd os that need to be addressed before the scanning. > > how full of a penetration can you have if (almost) all incoming ports are > blocked? > > thanks.... > Depends on the PCI level you are being audited for. But there are any number of attacks you can throw at a box thats fully closed up, and the aim is not to get it but rather to chew up all the ram and cpu and kill the box off. I suggest you read the PCI compliance document for the relevant level and make sure you test the system to comply with the documented requirements. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 19:50:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186D6106569F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AAE8FC08; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488E22FB.60203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:50:19 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stevefranks@ieee.org References: <539c60b90807280935i50041623pe54b6ad65d5b89b8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90807280935i50041623pe54b6ad65d5b89b8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: 'stray irq7's cause hang? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:50:19 -0000 Steve Franks wrote: > I've got a new system that hangs after about 2 hours - no > ctrl-alt-esc, not ctrl-alt-Fn, no ctrl-alt-delete. > > I tried hints.0.apic.disabled="YES" (that's apic, not acpi) (or > whatever the correct syntax from the handbook is), but I still get the > hang, and the stray irq 7's. As far as I can see, there's no other > dmesg output related. The stray interrupts may be a red herring. "Stray" means that no driver is handling them, and so there is no driver to screw up :) I see straq irq 7's on a HP proliant blade system, and also the hard hangs (it doesn't even reply to a NMI; this means it is almost certainly a hardware error). However I am now fairly certain the hangs are associated to disk failure. Several of the blades that were hanging went on to develop DMA errors from ATA, and after I validated the remaining systems with smartctl and took offline yet more blades that failed the self-tests, I have not had the problem recur. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 20:08:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16780106567F for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0AA8FC23 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 68-189-244-97.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.244.97] helo=Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KNZ1U-000Ab1-OW; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:50 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B89229A165; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <488E2753.5020002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:51 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Paul Natola References: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E9703639@www.fcimail.org> In-Reply-To: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E9703639@www.fcimail.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: Custmoize VNC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:08:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Paul Natola wrote: | I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to customize vnc | but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside the | lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will automatically, | upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # etc..) | | I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't bookmark the | page, any help would be appreciated | | | TIA | JP Hi Jean-Paul, I Googled for "VNC connection manager" and this site was on the first page: http://www.s-code.com/products/vncmanager/compare.aspx Is that something like what you're looking for? Best regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.sourcehosting.net/ http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjidT0sRouByUApARAiN/AKCBtdJajfcP+KiMfen69UK+pnMJkQCgxwSL osLEeFxovY0w89v/KVWYB9o= =EQ7G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 20:17:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE0B1065674 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnatola@familycareintl.org) Received: from mail.familycareintl.org (mail.familycareintl.org [68.167.21.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B618FC1C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnatola@familycareintl.org) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E970363C@www.fcimail.org> In-reply-to: <488E07DD.9070409@convergentmedia.com.au> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: OT: Customize VNC Thread-Index: Acjw2xhJAXMDwhOpRn6JW3mLKG5/qAAE50eg From: "Jean-Paul Natola" To: "Zyumbilev, Peter" Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: OT: Customize VNC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:47 -0000 One of the apps is opensource application that allows you to = create/customize an application - It was not specific to vnc I know everyone here has = probably heard of it- I just cant remember what it was =20 -----Original Message----- From: Zyumbilev, Peter [mailto:peter@convergentmedia.com.au]=20 Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:55 PM To: Jean-Paul Natola Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: Custmoize VNC I guess this is what you look for: http://www.uvnc.com/pchelpware/download/index.html Kind regards, Peter Zyumbilev IT Manager for Convergent Media Pty Ltd t +61-290-374-211 e peter@convergentmedia.com.au w www.convergentmedia.com.au Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to = customize vnc > but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside = the > lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will = automatically, > upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # etc..) >=20 > I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't = bookmark the > page, any help would be appreciated >=20 >=20 > TIA > JP > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 21:54:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741E61065670 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4561F8FC0A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 31312 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2008 21:54:27 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 28 Jul 2008 21:54:27 -0000 Message-ID: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:54:47 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:54:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ivan Voras wrote: > Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just >> wanted to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on >> Components. >> >> I appreciate your input on this. > > "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating system > consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the > kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomic > and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more > specific to get a more specific answer. > > Yeah, that's true, but not very informative. Look, I don't follow OSes all that much anymore, but if I had to call up an OS that would be made up of more of a set of indenpendent pieces, I think I would choose the GNU Hurd OS. From everything I read, it was never very successful, if one counts the ability to return some good throughput as being successful ... or, maybe they have some other characteristic which I'm not aware of. Anyhow, the HURD (at least in concept) is far, far more of a component based OS than anything else I'm aware of is. It's an interesting concept, at the very least, and I do understand it works. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiOQCcACgkQz62J6PPcoOkrAgCbBafpW+o8BqrV/t/S8ta8hd1b PykAnRtV8B28azFi9ffdYDrGfWYIfjlR =64AQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 21:55:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F171065676 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@supermonitoring.com) Received: from smtp10.mtu.ru (smtp10.mtu.ru [62.5.255.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F75C8FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from support@supermonitoring.com) Received: from smtp10.mtu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87D7366BD4 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:39:30 +0400 (MSD) Received: from ppp91-78-236-155.pppoe.mtu-net.ru (ppp91-77-156-198.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [91.77.156.198]) by smtp10.mtu.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 597B1366A56 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:39:30 +0400 (MSD) From: "Super Monitoring" To: "questions" Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:39:40 +0400 Organization: S.M MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20080728213930.597B1366A56@smtp10.mtu.ru> X-DCC-STREAM-Metrics: smtp10.mtu.ru 10001; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 Cc: Subject: Advertising. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:55:41 -0000 Hello! About your site will show, all over the world. Place the banner or text advertising. Rating of our site: http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/besthyiprating.com Good luck! http://www.besthyiprating.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 28 23:19:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE8E106566C for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unexpectedvalue@yahoo.com) Received: from web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25C598FC0A for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unexpectedvalue@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 11147 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jul 2008 22:53:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=QcEwjwb4x268KWlW5usJ1MbU/if2E2Gf2P2eMT8KhSpTjhA/dQxQX6HvXf6ShO70URSn1HhgdP5d5TA8qeiyYKzDYLsbBrS4A5aWYqraYI/ah0b+g1/BYQmjxsM0k3AIYeo0Q2gMMIDPlC8tOTWy4B5BFGeu+EvYV4EaRDvZ+gI=; X-YMail-OSG: 5CXTG8cVM1nayQt3_N5KVG7sp3gdH0iGzrU.1Un.Ba3FXonorHLgOSHdGDGjUGDQ4aH0CyKciaNqnR0d6uQeFop0YP9KRnrrpae6TtlyVTMswP8eWwUSm7jcl2E263Div4g- Received: from [66.93.136.35] by web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:53:11 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT) From: True Entropy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <135815.9131.qm@web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Subject: source routing across routing problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:19:52 -0000 This may have nothing to do with FreeBSD, but maybe someone will have a suggestion: We have servers A, B and C connected to three different ISPs on 3 continents. As of few days ago A and C cannot talk to each other (the routing problem is upstream of all end-point ISPs so who knows when will it be solved.) B can talk to both A and C. The 'obvious' idea is to use B as relay and source-route traffic between A and C to go via B. However, no amount of static routing, firewall allow-ing, sysctl-ing would do the trick. The packet would never even leave from A or C for the other side. Is there some other barrier to the source routing that has not been taken care of? I know that this can be taken care of with ssh tunnelling for each specific application/protocol, but the networks are more complex than abstracted here. In short, this was attempted: A: route add C B sysctl net.inet.ip.sourceroute=1 sysctl net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=1 B: rc.conf: gateway_enable="YES" sysctl net.inet.ip.sourceroute=1 sysctl net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=1 ipfw add pass ip from A to B ipfw add pass ip from B to A C: route add A B sysctl net.inet.ip.sourceroute=1 sysctl net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=1 . end . (spam starts here) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:08:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EAF106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218D08FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KNclp-0007KY-Ur for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:53 +0000 Received: from 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.59.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:53 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:08:40 +0200 Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-59-21.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck Robey wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just >>> wanted to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on >>> Components. >>> >>> I appreciate your input on this. >> "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating syste= m >> consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the >> kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomi= c >> and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more= >> specific to get a more specific answer. >=20 > Yeah, that's true, but not very informative. Look, I don't follow OSes= all that > much anymore, but if I had to call up an OS that would be made up of mo= re of a > set of indenpendent pieces, I think I would choose the GNU Hurd OS. Fr= om > everything I read, it was never very successful, if one counts the abil= ity to > return some good throughput as being successful ... or, maybe they have= some > other characteristic which I'm not aware of. >=20 > Anyhow, the HURD (at least in concept) is far, far more of a component = based OS > than anything else I'm aware of is. It's an interesting concept, at th= e very > least, and I do understand it works. Yes, if the OP is talking about microkernels, FreeBSD isn't it. --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjl+NldnAQVacBcgRArx3AKDrXHITyDZmosyuxb9iOvR8KtrhqQCfabgo Md4huJ6/YnxE0NJuv4iR7Ng= =lKM2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:29:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37141065675 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krgehlba@gehlbach.com) Received: from mail1.gehlbach.com (mail1.gehlbach.com [204.255.230.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25418FC19 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krgehlba@gehlbach.com) Received: from [192.168.50.97] (smtp.gehlbach.com [204.255.230.80]) by mail1.gehlbach.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6T07i7h067191 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:07:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from krgehlba@gehlbach.com) Message-ID: <488E602D.409@gehlbach.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:11:25 -0400 From: Kendra Renee Gehlbach User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X--MailScanner-MCPCheck: mcpnotspam, mcpspamassassin (score=0, required 2) X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: notspam, spamassassin (notcached, score=0.001, required 6, BAYES_50 0.00) X-MailScanner-From: krgehlba@gehlbach.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: network problems after upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:29:37 -0000 Hello, I recently updated a FreeBSD system that has been running fine on 6.2 to 7.0. I rebuilt world & kernel, installed world & kernel, mergemastered, then rebooted. Now both network cards (em0, an Intel Pro/1000 v6.7.3, and rl0, an SMC eznet-10/100) are giving continual watchdog timeouts. Ifconfig shows them as active, with appropriate settings. There are no IRQ conflicts that I can see. Pinging loopback and the ip address of each card succeeds, but we can't ping anything outside of the system. We've tried disabling ipf; we've taken out each card in turn, trying it with only one card; we've tried building the generic kernel, just in case we accidentally took out something necessary; we've taken rc.conf down to just defining the gateway and addresses for the network interfaces; at this point I don't know what to try next. I can restore from backup to cvsup and get any current changes, then rebuild, but I hate going through all of that without any reason to believe anything will change. Any ideas for further troubleshooting would be very welcome! Renee -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 00:51:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF9A106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B918FC1E for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T0q1ZP063562 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:52:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:48 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:51:50 -0000 hi people, my tube is starting to show its age. it's a "Hitachi superscan elite 751". i don't know when it was manufactured but I've had it for 5 years. besides it burning watts like crazy, it snaps from almost-full-width to full-width and back. it's time to check around, and as always, i'm asking here first. i'm using an old, analog KVM box with four jacks, so whatever display i get has to have dual capability. both digital and analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? thanks much, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 01:15:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7738E10657AA for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-outgoing-helo.tristatelogic.com (112.171-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net [66.60.171.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A003C8FC2A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A7611423 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:32 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: <83072.1217294132@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Two minor IPFW-related questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:15:33 -0000 Just a couple of questions about IPFW-related things: 1) Somewhere the other day I read a recommendation... which looked rather official to me that the time... that all fragments should be firwalled out, e.g. thusly: deny any to any in frag Is that actually a Good Thing To Do? Are there really no legitimate packate fragments out there on the Internet? 2) What is the significance of the last three numbers in the following log line? What exactly does each one of them represent? Jul 28 00:00:13 segfault kernel: ipfw: 250 Deny UDP 192.228.91.19 66.60.171.112 in via rl0 (frag 60396:368@1480) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:13:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004C8106568A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE758FC1A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so5744122rvf.43 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JimTJVK35skh8BNrcFFx72BFjwkFWfqYfBeXA0LHjN8=; b=nBv5c9+udifofz7yDBvdYukofSphy6xQ+FC7cpHeXvWIuRjhLIg3PTYQBHRY0/itds 0n3ejcRCFFy76+1pZsl9fMjv7q16gtZUM19b0E0o6nTFrzLbI3fq2XejZybvhO+5eiF4 uVrZMqDoZyemSLZINd//YlLDs5KE7+WHe/pMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=IHdg731vZniBreWyXSxCw3s8xZRxtl1E9BQU8ocFSa8o0K5RkGSDP23Jlu6OIZ35j+ 8201ghbdAkBiR4eJF9Imgjs4EjSo8HEU2o2ouzwtyaK0zar2eezTpXSgBbl7yT8HkkaT RVc+pnJHRmIEH0WUw4lV2O5kmTktSQmiHqA0o= Received: by 10.141.1.2 with SMTP id d2mr2705802rvi.129.1217297588247; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.28.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:13:03 -0500 From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: "Gary Kline" In-Reply-To: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:13:09 -0000 > so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? I have several (6) Samsung SyncMaster 941BW monitors I am very Happy with them Sam Fourman Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:20:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D58C1065675 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABDA8FC1D for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T2KRuI015547; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:20:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:20:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> Message-ID: <20080728221623.R3537@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:20:32 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Gary Kline wrote: > [snip] whatever display i get has to have dual capability. both > digital and analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. > > so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? I've been using a ViewSonic VP930b for a few years, and been very happy with it. It has two VGA inputs, no DVI. Probably not made anymore so I guess that's moot. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:27:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1E1065674 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE5D8FC15 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl121-117.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.240.117]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6T2R6H5028071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:11 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T2R5Vr020802; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6T2R5Qt020695; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <83072.1217294132@tristatelogic.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:05 +0300 Message-ID: <878wvlv30m.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6T2R6H5028071 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.803, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.60, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two minor IPFW-related questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:19 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:32 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > Just a couple of questions about IPFW-related things: > > 1) Somewhere the other day I read a recommendation... which looked > rather official to me that the time... that all fragments should be > firwalled out, e.g. thusly: > > deny any to any in frag > > Is that actually a Good Thing To Do? Are there really no legitimate > packate fragments out there on the Internet? Yes, they may be legitimate packet fragments. Normally, the path MTU discovery algorithm should kick in most of the time. It is turned on by default # pwd /usr/src/sys/netinet # fgrep path_mtu_discovery tcp_output.c int path_mtu_discovery = 1; SYSCTL_INT(_net_inet_tcp, OID_AUTO, path_mtu_discovery, CTLFLAG_RW, &path_mtu_discovery, 1, "Enable Path MTU Discovery"); if (path_mtu_discovery) # But there may be routes between your FreeBSD box and the two endpoints of a connection that do not have this option, or have it disabled. This means that if you are not absolutely sure that all hosts 'inside' and 'outside' the firewall support path MTU discovery *and* have it turned on, it's still possible to get fragmented datagrams. The reason why fragments may be prudent to drop in a firewall is that non-initial fragments don't contain enough information to be classified on a port-by-port basis. Fragmentation requires that each fragment should contain a data portion that is a multiple of 8 bytes (except for the last fragment of a datagram), so the first fragment will generally contain useful bits (i.e. UDP source port, and UDP destination port), but this means that a 'malicious' user may use *non* initial fragments to generate artificial load on your firewall. A router that accepts fragments and isn't configured to drop them may have to keep non-initial fragments for a certain amount of time, hoping that the first fragment of the datagram will arrive soon, and the datagram will be reconstructed before forwarding it. If your firewall keeps around non-initial fragments and a malicious user sends thousands or even millions of non-initial fragments for seemingly legitimate connections, then your firewall may run out of useful resources. FWIW, you can find a lot of information about this sort of attack by searching the net for "fragment DoS attack". > 2) What is the significance of the last three numbers in the following > log line? What exactly does each one of them represent? > > Jul 28 00:00:13 segfault kernel: ipfw: 250 Deny UDP 192.228.91.19 66.60.171.112 in via rl0 (frag 60396:368@1480) The three numbers are: * IP Identification Number, of the datagram. This is the copied straight out of the IP header's ip.ip_id field. * The number of data bytes in the data portion of this fragment (the size of the full IP fragment excluding the size of the IP header itself). * The offset of this fragment from the start of the full datagram. This is useful when trying to reconstruct the initial, full IP datagram, after all its fragments have been received. Non-final fragments also have the 'more fragments' flag set in their IP header, and then the three numbers are followed by "+", i.e.: (frag 60396:1480@0+) # Initial fragment, because the fragment offset is zero. There are # more fragments (the '+' flag is printed). It's sort of expected # that the _initial_ fragment will always have the '+' flag set. # After all that's the whole point of fragmenting the original IP # datagram :) (frag 60417:1480@5920+) # Probably the fifth fragment of a relatively large IP datagram # (5920 = 1480 * 4). I'm saying `probably' because the mechanism # of fragmentation permits fragmenting a fragment _again_ while it # passes through routers. There are more fragments (presence of the # '+' flag indicates 'more fragments'). (frag 17234:19@1480) # Probably the second and last fragment of an IP datagram with IP.Id # = 17234. There are 19 data bytes in the datagram, it is probably # the second datagram if we assume an MTU of 1480 (usually typical # in Ethernet interfaces). This particular way of presenting fragment size, offset and flags is also used in tcpdump output, so if you learn to read fragment info this way it will be useful if you have to look at tcpdump traces too :-) HTH, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:30:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8579D106567F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F1B8FC14 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T2UMOW015578; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:30:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:30:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20080728221623.R3537@tripel.monochrome.org> Message-ID: <20080728222750.O3537@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <20080728221623.R3537@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:30:23 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Chris Hill wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Gary Kline wrote: > >> [snip] whatever display i get has to have dual capability. both >> digital and analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. >> >> so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? > > I've been using a ViewSonic VP930b for a few years, and been very > happy with it. It has two VGA inputs, no DVI. Probably not made > anymore so I guess that's moot. - Replying to my own post like a tool - This monitor does in fact have a DVI input in addition to the two VGAs. Don't know if that counts as 'digital' or not. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:07:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2CC1065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: from web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF53B8FC08 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 32320 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2008 02:07:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=vri32nTu8GcE4jce+5wWG+l/wmtGmKeqxgMGmSekwWI9Jf/ki8IGj3Qh1L/mKF2kge96efsOEC7EPZ0VyuteLceUK2O8kQSSDTXHpHxJADNymdl0y5YZ6QXO4hKK3zq1+x6Sqns9u8ePAQBw/mtN3ixixFs6sdx20q8feAQ1yD4=; Received: from [202.57.64.100] by web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:07:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:07:20 -0700 (PDT) From: lyd mc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <893208.31765.qm@web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:48:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: alydiomc@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:07:22 -0000 hi guys, Is there any program that insert or remove disclaimer?=20 For example, if a reply message=A0 containing my disclaimer i want it to be= removed at the end of the mail body and put somewhere before the "QUOTE" l= ine. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 From:user@company.abc =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 To:resu@company.xyz =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Subject: Re: disclaimer blah blah blah =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 New messages =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=20 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 My Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0 <------ ( new l= ocation of disclaimer) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=20 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 -------------------Old message (Quotin= g)------------ =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Old messages =A0=20 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 MY Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0 <----- (I wa= nt this to be remove and put above) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=20 Thank you. alydmc =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 02:56:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E40106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342CF8FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T2uijH064265; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:56:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:56:31 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Chris Hill Message-ID: <20080729025631.GC96894@thought.org> References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <20080728221623.R3537@tripel.monochrome.org> <20080728222750.O3537@tripel.monochrome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080728222750.O3537@tripel.monochrome.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:56:33 -0000 On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:30:22PM -0400, Chris Hill wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Chris Hill wrote: > > >On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Gary Kline wrote: > > > >>[snip] whatever display i get has to have dual capability. both > >>digital and analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. > >> > >>so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? > > > >I've been using a ViewSonic VP930b for a few years, and been very > >happy with it. It has two VGA inputs, no DVI. Probably not made > >anymore so I guess that's moot. > > - Replying to my own post like a tool - > > This monitor does in fact have a DVI input in addition to the two VGAs. > Don't know if that counts as 'digital' or not. > while i can still TYPE today:: the fact is that i was a hardware major, not software. but got shuffled into pporting an f77 compiler for my intership.... now, i know almost Zero about hardware, so no clue what this "dvi input" means. sad, isnt it? .... > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 03:17:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19DB1065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D248FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so4838153ana.13 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Zt0agwxidZ5NPt9v4MNokOH6RHAJpljht6eOF7a4cFE=; b=v5b3FGrujHy6hNprSP67tBXm26uxvjmZgEYtCexCo3OUjoXUKQhvmYRE1xmYrjhSKP JELRrLN+4KySVtAc4LS1E4BDrSOZD3xbBFcMQZg8S7oxC8+UMWg5y0GqBbpuXBHNFAI7 KCttx2Jv2zoypGxpya5IqtsL4gOXx3GuvzmRg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rgV8bYUc1tre9KzZ/8gYRvvyFm5sv4LtGMQIKo9C7GomJESQm2xoB54PhYudCe8/6j zb9r3xrlCSWhFrro8ErZBmzUlx/4Y/2c4QtcaQJWYTWUz7TMS9yTaF3yRM9kdADuRG+o eOwhJGfDXIdoVgKykrEJIz1DBoj0fMyQ+UmcM= Received: by 10.100.191.19 with SMTP id o19mr1452096anf.64.1217301463814; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:17:43 -0400 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: alydiomc@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <893208.31765.qm@web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <893208.31765.qm@web52203.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:17:44 -0000 are you using X11? do you use thunderbird/mozilla mail client? i believe thunderbird has a fancy signature add-on that does something like that. On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:07 PM, lyd mc wrote: > hi guys, > > Is there any program that insert or remove disclaimer? > > For example, if a reply message containing my disclaimer i want it to be > removed at the end of the mail body and put somewhere before the "QUOTE" > line. > > From:user@company.abc > To:resu@company.xyz > Subject: Re: disclaimer blah blah blah > > > New messages > > My Disclaimer <------ ( new location of disclaimer) > > > -------------------Old message (Quoting)------------ > > Old messages > > MY Disclaimer <----- (I want this to be remove and put > above) > > > > > Thank you. > > alydmc > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 03:22:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00319106567A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C178FC16 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so4678852wra.27 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.73.5 with SMTP id v5mr8590052aga.41.1217299976946; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd.localdomain ( [66.26.40.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q57sm9671557wrq.5.2008.07.28.19.52.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:52:51 -0400 From: Chess Griffin To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080728225251.6ebcd345@fbsd.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:22:10 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:51:48 -0700 Gary Kline wrote: > hi people, > > my tube is starting to show its age. it's a "Hitachi > superscan elite 751". i don't know when it was manufactured but > I've had it for 5 years. besides it burning watts like crazy, it > snaps from almost-full-width to full-width and back. it's time to > check around, and as always, i'm asking here first. > > i'm using an old, analog KVM box with four jacks, so whatever > display i get has to have dual capability. both digital and > analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. > > so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? > > thanks much, > > gary > I have been very happy with two identical Hanns-G HX191D 19" LCD monitors I bought off Newegg about a year ago and I use them in a dual head DVI setup (they have analog VGA inputs as well). I don't think this model is sold there anymore, but there are many other Hanns-G models at Newegg and they all seem to garner very good user reviews. I like Hanns-G because they make great screens at good prices. -- Chess Griffin GPG Public Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 03:48:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C10106566C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-outgoing-helo.tristatelogic.com (112.171-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net [66.60.171.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D718FC29 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9711423 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:09 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:27:05 +0300. <878wvlv30m.fsf@kobe.laptop> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:09 -0700 Message-ID: <84492.1217303289@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Two minor IPFW-related questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:48:10 -0000 In message <878wvlv30m.fsf@kobe.laptop>, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:32 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette" om> wrote: >> Just a couple of questions about IPFW-related things: >> >> 1) Somewhere the other day I read a recommendation... which looked >> rather official to me that the time... that all fragments should be >> firwalled out, e.g. thusly: >> >> deny any to any in frag >> >> Is that actually a Good Thing To Do? Are there really no legitimate >> packate fragments out there on the Internet? First let me send a big THANK YOU to Giorgos Keramidas for providing such timely and detailed replies to my IPFW questions. Much appreciated. Now that I've got that out of the way, let me say a couple of things. First, on one particular machine of mine, I'm seeing a fair number... many dozens or so per hour... of /var/log/security logfile entries for ipfw-rejected packet fragments. This is on a machine that has a very busy name server. The nameserver in question was recently upgraded to bind 9.5.0-P1 (so I'm not worred that there is any kind of attack going on here) _and_ also the ipfw ruleset recently had this added: deny any to any in frag The majority of the rejected "frag" packets are UDP packets, and I've just now determined that many/most/all of those are coming from actual name servers elsewhere. In short, I do believe that these packet fragments are mostly (or entirely) perfectly legitimate packet fragments... probably partial answers to DNS queries that the nameserver on this machine sent out. So now, given that I understand (or believe I do, anyway) everything that you, Giorgos, said about the possibility of a DoS attack based on packet fragmentation, and given that I _do not_ believe that anybody has it in mind to do a DoS against me at the present time (either using packet fragements or any other sort of DoS technique) is it really wise for me to be dropping all of these DNS response packet fragments? Wouldn't I be better off letting them in? I'm most particularly concerned about the possibility that... because I have ipfw dropping all fragments... I may be completely losing some DNS responses that I actually do want, and for which there are no other DNS servers that will give me unfragmented answers. Is this a reasonable concern? Might it be wise, in my case, to remove the rule that's killing all of the packet fragments from my ipfw rule set... and then just put it back if I ever seem to be undergoing a DoS? OK, one last question. I've just read the helpful little brief tutorial about path MTU discovery... which Google helped me to find: http://www.netheaven.com/pmtu.html This is kinda sorta enlightening about why most of the fragments that my ipfw is currently rejecting are either at offset 1472 or at offset 1480... but not quite. What's the significance of these specific offset numbers (1472 and 1480)? Is there some particular kind of hardware or well-known- phenomenon (like the one described in the document above) that commonly produces fragments with those specific offsets, i.e. 1472 and 1480? Just curious. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 04:07:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67F106566C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: from web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 869B28FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68394 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2008 04:07:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=URWiNc2jRRvvb0SqnKt6neSeJl1hUogtb7dNgTppZ8L7ArgG6ETDS23M5d7mSk/OAYHU98FFrHjL6b3dlP0OvGzko5d0EfayzhgaIVbDdr2t9eiHZAM9E2UIRjYVcvrmOOQZ9gzgLioPva0PVUrS+u1iC8+JSkOUEex7udSLjKk=; Received: from [202.57.64.100] by web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:07:27 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:07:27 -0700 (PDT) From: lyd mc To: darko gavrilovic In-Reply-To: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: alydiomc@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:07:28 -0000 Hi darko, What I mean is adding a disclaimer/boilerplate for any outgoing message jus= t like mimedefang feature. However, I don't want it to be redundant. For ex= ample if a mail already contains my disclaimer (usually mail from a reply m= essage), it should be relocated next to the new message not at the bottom o= f the reply message. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 new message body =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 new message body =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 <---- new location of disclaimer =A0=A0=A0=A0 ---------------old messages ---------------------- =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 old message =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 old message =A0=A0=A0=A0=20 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 <--- to be relocated Regards, alydmc --- On Tue, 7/29/08, darko gavrilovic wrote: From: darko gavrilovic Subject: Re: email disclaimer To: alydiomc@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2008, 11:17 AM are you using X11? do you use thunderbird/mozilla mail client? i believe th= underbird has a fancy signature add-on that does something like that. On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:07 PM, lyd mc wrote: hi guys, Is there any program that insert or remove disclaimer? For example, if a reply message=A0 containing my disclaimer i want it to be= removed at the end of the mail body and put somewhere before the "QUOTE" l= ine. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 From:user@company.abc =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 To:resu@company.xyz =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Subject: Re: disclaimer blah blah blah =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 New messages =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 My Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0 <------ ( new l= ocation of disclaimer) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 -------------------Old message (Quotin= g)------------ =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Old messages =A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 MY Disclaimer=A0=A0=A0=A0 <----- (I wa= nt this to be remove and put above) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Thank you. alydmc _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " --=20 regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- = M.W.Lucas =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 06:09:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED63C1065674 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from t1088.8com.gr (t1088.8com.gr [89.163.145.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56448FC16 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from John ([83.235.249.6]) by t1088.8com.gr (IceWarp 9.1.0) with SMTP id JNM07705 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:09:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: "John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ]" To: References: <20080728200902.EE19B1065684@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:09:15 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 Subject: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:09:12 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:09 PM Subject: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 3 > Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. 'help' (John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ]) > 2. No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 (vardyh) > 3. Racoon not identifying host specified in config file (Torbj?rn) > 4. Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports (Jeffrey Goldberg) > 5. Re: new vanilla system fails to install many packages/ports > (Steve Franks) > 6. 'stray irq7's cause hang? (Steve Franks) > 7. Cleaning data off a remote machine (Chris Hastie) > 8. amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? (bsd) > 9. Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine (Andrew L. Gould) > 10. Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 (Matthew Seaman) > 11. Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies[SOLVED] (bsd) > 12. Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine (Wojciech Puchar) > 13. Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine (Roland Smith) > 14. OT: Custmoize VNC (Jean-Paul Natola) > 15. LispWorks Personal on FreeBSD 7 (N. Raghavendra) > 16. pci compliance (kalin m) > 17. Re: amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? (bsd) > 18. Re: pci compliance (Ross Cameron) > 19. Re: pci compliance (kalin m) > 20. RE: pci compliance (Bob McConnell) > 21. Component-based Operating System. (Juan Carlos Villalobos) > 22. Re: Component-based Operating System. (Ivan Voras) > 23. Re: pci compliance (Ross Cameron) > 24. Re: 'stray irq7's cause hang? (Kris Kennaway) > 25. Re: OT: Custmoize VNC (Greg Larkin) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:42 +0300 > From: "John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ]" > Subject: 'help' > To: > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 3:00 PM > Subject: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 2 > > >> Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: malloc options (Karl Vogel) >> 2. Re: malloc options (Giorgos Keramidas) >> 3. Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) >> 4. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) >> 5. Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports >> (Jan Henrik Sylvester) >> 6. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Subhro) >> 7. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) >> 8. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) >> 9. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Svein Halvor Halvorsen) >> 10. Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE (Manolis Kiagias) >> 11. wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) >> 12. wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) >> 13. RE: wget vs fetch (Marcel Grandemange) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT) >> From: vogelke+software@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) >> Subject: Re: malloc options >> To: Giorgos Keramidas >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <20080728015539.70030B7B9@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> >> >>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >>>> Doug Hardie wrote: >> >> D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with >> versions >> D> 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is quite >> complex >> D> and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a typical use. The >> D> problems only occur reasonably randomly and only under quite heavy >> load. >> D> The developer is looking into it, but the problem only occurs on >> FreeBSD >> D> 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In the meantime I am losing money >> because >> D> of it. >> >>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >>>> Giorgos Keramidas said: >> >> G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone quite >> G> extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use it in >> FreeBSD >> G> 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way was deemed >> important >> G> enough that it is now used by other projects too. >> >> I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under heavy >> load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I used. I >> finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one >> application: >> >> http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ >> >> This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if >> you >> want to give it a try. >> >> -- >> Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company >> vogelke at pobox dot com http://www.pobox.com/~vogelke >> >> And God said, "Let there be vodka!" And saw that it was good. Then God >> said, "Let there be light!" And then said, "Whoa - too much light." >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:13:50 +0300 >> From: Giorgos Keramidas >> Subject: Re: malloc options >> To: vogelke+software@pobox.com >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <87k5f6odc1.fsf@kobe.laptop> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:55:39 -0400 (EDT), vogelke+software@pobox.com >> (Karl >> Vogel) wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:36:35 -0700, >>>>> Doug Hardie wrote: >>> >>> D> The program has worked under considerable load for many years with >>> D> versions 3.7 to 6.2. Problems only occur with 7.0. The program is >>> D> quite complex and big. It uses probably hundreds of mallocs in a >>> D> typical use. The problems only occur reasonably randomly and only >>> D> under quite heavy load. The developer is looking into it, but the >>> D> problem only occurs on FreeBSD 7.0, not any other Unix systems. In >>> D> the meantime I am losing money because of it. >>> >>>>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:03:58 +0300, >>>>> Giorgos Keramidas said: >>> >>> G> While that's understandable, the current malloc() has undergone >>> G> quite extensive testing by Jason Evans and a lot of people who use >>> G> it in FreeBSD 7.X or later. Its ability to expose bugs in this way >>> G> was deemed important enough that it is now used by other projects >>> G> too. >>> >>> I ran into a similar problem with the BSD allocator running under >>> heavy load that didn't happen under any Solaris or Linux system I >>> used. I finally fixed it by using Doug Lea's malloc just for this one >>> application: >>> >>> >>> http://shell.siscom.net/~vogelke/Software/Languages/C/Libraries/malloc/ >>> >>> This was under FreeBSD 6.*, but it might provide another data point if >>> you want to give it a try. >> >> I'm not sure how similar the two problems are. I quite frankly know >> _very_ little of what the original problem was, other than "I am >> encountering issues where values just seem to arbitrarily change". >> >> Memory exhaustion is a potential problem with almost any sort of >> allocator that fragments memory in any way, but random corruption of >> user data is probably a different issue :/ >> >> If you have some sort of description of the workload that triggered the >> memory exhaustion with jemalloc (the current malloc implementation in >> FreeBSD), it's probably a good idea to talk to Jason Evans about it (his >> email is "jasone" at FreeBSD.org). He may be able to help you tune >> malloc or even make changes to the system version of malloc that make it >> less vulnerable to this sort of problem. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:23 +0200 >> From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Subject: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D72BF.80205@lvor.halvorsen.cc> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hi, list! >> >> >> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >> >> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >> don't give that address away to someone else. >> >> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >> >> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >> client asks for an IP address? >> >> >> sv. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:48:19 +0300 >> From: Manolis Kiagias >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D79C3.6070000@gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >>> Hi, list! >>> >>> >>> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >>> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >>> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >>> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >>> >>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>> >> >> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >> static IP address to someone else. >> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something >> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >> will never assign. >>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>> >> >> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) >> >>> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >>> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >>> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >>> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >>> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >>> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >>> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >>> client asks for an IP address? >>> >> >> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >> IP address): >> >> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >> ISP servers. >> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >> 10.0.0.1) >> >> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:52:48 +0200 >> From: Jan Henrik Sylvester >> Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports >> To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Cc: questions-list freebsd >> Message-ID: <488D7AD0.5090804@janh.de> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Svein wrote: >> > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a >> > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest >> > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? >> >> Yes, there is a problem. See my posting here: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html >> >> Unfortunatelly, I have not got an answer, but it is obvious packages >> using this new symbol must fail: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-May/091586.html >> >> The question is, if other package may fail as well. >> >> I have had one more error that went away after recompiling a STABLE >> package: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2008-July/020520.html >> >> I do not know if this is related, though. >> >> If you find out more, please, let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> Jan Henrik >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:35:55 +0530 >> From: Subhro >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: "Manolis Kiagias" >> Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , >> questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Just to add to that suggestion, if you have a separate DHCP server, >> make sure your router works as a DHCP client for the internal network >> as well. You should be able to do that by telnetting into the >> management port. You may use a serial cable as well. >> >> This is required in order to get the NAT working properly. >> >> Thanks >> Subhro >> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Manolis Kiagias >> wrote: >>> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, list! >>>> >>>> >>>> I have a private home network, on an ADSL2+ connection to the >>>> internet. The home network is behind NAT, all automatically set up >>>> by the router/dhcp server/wlan access point/adsl modem that I got >>>> from my ISP. It's a Thomson SpeedTouch 585 router. >>>> >>>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>>> >>> >>> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >>> static >>> IP address to someone else. >>> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >>> narrower >>> values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something like >>> exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP will >>> never >>> assign. >>>> >>>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>>> >>> >>> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is 255.255.255.0, >>> but >>> check your router or your clients) >>> >>>> Now, on my local network I'd like to put a diskless machine. As I >>>> understand it, my DHCP server needs to tell the client about the >>>> "filename" and a "next-server" to use. I don't think I can setup the >>>> Thomson router to do this. All the instruction I can find online >>>> advises me to install a DHCP server on the same machine that serves >>>> the pxe boot image. But if I do that, I'll get two DHCP servers on >>>> my local network. Is that ok? Will there be a race condition, when a >>>> client asks for an IP address? >>>> >>> >>> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >>> permanently >>> and assign this function to a machine. >>> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >>> IP >>> address): >>> >>> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >>> or >>> its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address as >>> a >>> DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to ISP >>> servers. >>> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >>> 10.0.0.1) >>> >>> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >>> as >>> well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Subhro Kar >> Software Engineer >> Dynamic Digital Technologies Pvt. Ltd. >> EPY-3, Sector: V >> Salt Lake City >> 700091 >> India >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:56:47 +0200 >> From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: Manolis Kiagias >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D89CF.1040100@lvor.halvorsen.cc> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>> >>> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >>> static IP address to someone else. >>> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >>> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for something >>> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >>> will never assign. >> >> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >> >> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >> also wants a static address. >> >>>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>> >>> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >>> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) >> >> You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space >> available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse >> scheme for the static adresses. >> >> Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router >> figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps >> them out of its dhcp address pool. >> >> >>> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >>> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >>> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information (besides >>> IP address): >>> >>> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >>> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >>> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >>> ISP servers. >>> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >>> 10.0.0.1) >>> >>> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this info >>> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >> >> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >> >> Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router >> dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient >> doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. >> >> >> sv. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 8 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:42:52 +0300 >> From: Manolis Kiagias >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D949C.5020002@gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >>> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>> >>>>> Now, on this network, most of the computers get their IP by means of >>>>> DHCP. Except our home audio server, which have a hard coded ip >>>>> address in rc.conf, set to something within the range of the dhcp >>>>> server (10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253). The server seems to pick this up, and >>>>> don't give that address away to someone else. >>>>> >>>> You may also want to ensure that the router will never allocate your >>>> static IP address to someone else. >>>> Look at the DHCP router settings either for DHCP scope (set it to >>>> narrower values, and use a static IP outside the range) or for >>>> something >>>> like exceptions / exclusion where you can mark a specific IP that DHCP >>>> will never assign. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>> >>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>> also wants a static address. >>> >>> >> >> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I >> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to >> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. >> I would also try a factory reset or firmware upgrade of the router. I >> have been using a Speedtouch 500 series for years, and never had any >> problems with settings not getting registered. AFAIR the 585 has one of >> the new web interfaces and it is kind of confusing. I found the 500 >> easier to use. >> >>>>> I've tried using other addresses outside this range, like 10.0.1.1, >>>>> but that doesn't work. All network access is lost when I do that. >>>>> >>>> 10.0.1.1 is a different network (I assume your netmask is >>>> 255.255.255.0, but check your router or your clients) >>>> >>> >>> You're right! But how do I make the entire 10/24 adress space >>> available? It would be "clean" (I guess) to have a different adresse >>> scheme for the static adresses. >>> >> >> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >> from this space. >> >>> Anyway, it this point this isn't really critical, as the router >>> figures out that the addresses I use, are in fact in use, and keeps >>> them out of its dhcp address pool. >>> >>> >>> >>>> You will have to shutdown the router's DHCP. Probably disable it >>>> permanently and assign this function to a machine. >>>> The DHCP of the router also sends you the following information >>>> (besides >>>> IP address): >>>> >>>> - DNS Server(s): Either the ones used by your ISP (consult its website) >>>> or its own address (i.e. 10.0.0.1). Most routers send their own address >>>> as a DNS server and perform the resolution by sending your request to >>>> ISP servers. >>>> - Gateway address: This is always the router's local IP address (i.e. >>>> 10.0.0.1) >>>> >>>> If you setup your own DHCP server, make sure it is set to send this >>>> info >>>> as well. (These are commonly known as DHCP options) >>>> >>> >>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >>> >> >> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway >> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static >> configuration. >> >>> Is there a way to debug the DHCP response from the current router >>> dhcp server? So I can see what options it actually sends? dhclient >>> doesn't seem to have a "more verbose" option, only less. >>> >>> >>> sv. >>> >> >> >> Not sure about this, sorry. However, don't expect much more than >> IP/Netmask, DNS Server, Gateway from a simple router. These should not >> be difficult to configure in isc-dhcp3 (net/isc-dhcp3-server). >> >> Have a look at this article: >> >> http://www.howtoforge.com/dhcp_server_linux_debian_sarge >> >> It is linux oriented, but very easy to adjust for FreeBSD. >> You will also need to add: >> >> option domain-name-servers 10.0.0.1; >> >> to set the DNS server address to your clients. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:59:41 +0200 >> From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: Manolis Kiagias >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D988D.10901@lvor.halvorsen.cc> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>>> >>>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>>> also wants a static address. >>> >>> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so I >>> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it to >>> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. >> >> I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just >> keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I >> seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. >> >> (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) >> >> >>> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >>> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >>> from this space. >> >> Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp >> range as it was. >> >> >>>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >>> >>> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid gateway >>> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >>> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the static >>> configuration. >> >> Ok, I will look into this. >> >> Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far >> more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch >> server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I >> can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". >> >> This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config >> files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can >> create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as >> paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value >> as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, >> and more. >> >> How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are >> these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? >> >> Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try >> to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you >> go the isc dhcp route? >> >> >> Thank you very much for your help so far! >> >> >> sv. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 10 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:25:39 +0300 >> From: Manolis Kiagias >> Subject: Re: Network, routers, DHCP and PXE >> To: Svein Halvor Halvorsen >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <488D9EA3.4010503@gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: >>> Manolis Kiagias wrote: >>> >>>>> Yeah, but even though the router has customizable values for this >>>>> range, and issues a warning when i try to change them, it still >>>>> doesn't change them when I click "yes" on the warning. It is >>>>> pre-configured to 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253 >>>>> >>>>> I could of course use 10.0.0.254 for my static ip, but my room mate >>>>> also wants a static address. >>>>> >>>> What are you trying to set it at? I would just lower the 253 value, so >>>> I >>>> could use the upper end for my static addresses. If you try to set it >>>> to >>>> a subnet outside it's own address, it will definitely not accept it. >>>> >>> >>> I managed to change the router ip address to 10.0.0.1/23 and just >>> keep the default dhcp address space as 10.0.0.2-10.0.0.253. Now I >>> seem to be able to use 10.0.1.1/24 for my own private use. >>> >>> (I don't think I really know what I'm doing here, but it works!) >>> >> >> Well, a netmask of 255.255.254.0 should give you 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.1.254 >> host addresses. >> 10.0.1.1 is within range, it should work. >>> >>> >>>> Well problem is, a netmask of 255.255.255.0 means only the last octet >>>> can be used for hosts. Your DHCP server is already assigning addresses >>>> from this space. >>>> >>> >>> Well, I changed it to 255.255.254.0 (0xfffffe00) but kept the dhcp >>> range as it was. >>> >>> >>> >> >> The DHCP range you are assigning is a subset of what you allowed with >> the netmask, thus it is valid. >> >>>>> So as long as I make my own DHCP server act the same way as the >>>>> router one, I should be fine? NAT and all will work? >>>>> >>>> Yes. As long as the clients have a valid DNS to ask, and a valid >>>> gateway >>>> to send their packets, everything will work properly. If you come to >>>> think about it, you are already doing this on the system with the >>>> static >>>> configuration. >>>> >>> >>> Ok, I will look into this. >>> >>> Also, looking through the telnet interface options (which are far >>> more than the web interface gives), I see that I can add "dhch >>> server option templates", "dhcp server option instances" and that I >>> can assign such an instance to the "dhcp server pool options". >>> >> >> Ah, yes completely forgot the speedtouch has a telnet interface as well. >> I messed with it a few times myself, mostly for fun ;) >> >>> This uses a different config scheme than the isc dhcp server config >>> files, though. And it seems I need to create a template before I can >>> create an instance. The template takes a name and an option id as >>> paramters. The instance, then takes a name, a template, and a value >>> as mandatory paramters. Also enterprice number, suboption number, >>> and more. >>> >>> How does the "filename", "next-server", etc map to option ids? Are >>> these isomorphic, or do I get this completely wrong? >>> >>> Does this make any sense to you, or anyone else here? Should I try >>> to make the router DHCP server serve the right options, or would you >>> go the isc dhcp route? >>> >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help so far! >>> >>> >>> sv. >>> >>> >> >> >> I have only done PXE with Windows servers, and it has been quite some >> time - cannot remember the details. >> I certainly would not advise you to use the router for this - even if it >> is possible it has several drawbacks. >> >> - You will, sooner or later, change the router and your new one may not >> have the capability >> - You will spend a probably unreasonable amount of time trying to make >> it work - and it may not even succeed >> - Learning how to perform this on FreeBSD will help you apply it in many >> other situations. >> >> I would definitely go the isc-dhcp route. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 11 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:09:16 +0200 >> From: "Marcel Grandemange" >> Subject: wget vs fetch >> To: >> Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za >> Message-ID: <000f01c8f09a$002bf610$0083e230$@za.net> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 >> >> >> >> It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even >> building ports. >> >> ALL transfers that are FTP fail. >> >> >> >> Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. >> >> >> >> http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ >> >> ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ >> >> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES >> >> >> >> And here is the strange thing.. >> >> Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. >> >> The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried >> leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for >> wget >> once again) >> >> >> >> And here is the crux. >> >> >> >> I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this >> makes me think fetch is broke somehow. >> >> How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? >> >> >> >> >> >> Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing >> with >> msg: >> >> >> >> Try `wget --help' for more options. >> >> => Attempting to fetch from >> http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. >> >> wget: invalid option -- >> >> Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thankx ahead! >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 12 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:28:27 +0200 >> From: "Marcel Grandemange" >> Subject: wget vs fetch >> To: >> Cc: steyn@e-soul.co.za >> Message-ID: >> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> I have a problem with a box I upgraded from FreeBSD 6.2 To FreeBSD7 >> >> >> >> It seems the following is happening when I try use portupgrade -a or even >> building ports. >> >> ALL transfers that are FTP fail. >> >> >> >> Now to make this simple, I have following environmental variables set.. >> >> >> >> http_proxy=http://192.168.12.4:3128/ >> >> ftp_proxy=http://192.168.12.1:3128/ >> >> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES >> >> >> >> And here is the strange thing.. >> >> Fetch fails, but if I use wget there is no problem. >> >> The firewall does allow ftp to go directly aswell, so I have also tried >> leaving out any and all proxy settings, this fails aswell. (Except for >> wget >> once again) >> >> >> >> And here is the crux. >> >> >> >> I have 5 mahcines on SAME network that has no issues like this, so this >> makes me think fetch is broke somehow. >> >> How can I force FreeBSD to use wget instead of fetch to bypass this? >> >> >> >> >> >> Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing >> with >> msg: >> >> >> >> Try `wget --help' for more options. >> >> => Attempting to fetch from >> http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. >> >> wget: invalid option -- >> >> Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thankx ahead! >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 13 >> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:43:47 +0200 >> From: "Marcel Grandemange" >> Subject: RE: wget vs fetch >> To: "'Sergey Zaharchenko'" >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Message-ID: <004a01c8f0a7$326df210$9749d630$@za.net> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Thank You, Worked Perfectly! >> Saved My Life ;> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sergey Zaharchenko [mailto:doublef-ctm@yandex.ru] >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:35 PM >> To: Marcel Grandemange >> Subject: Re: wget vs fetch >> >> Hello Marcel! >> >> Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:09:16PM +0200 you wrote: >> >>> Ive tried setting env FETCH_CMD=wget but that results in wget failing >>> with >>> msg: >>> >>> >>> >>> Try `wget --help' for more options. >>> >>> => Attempting to fetch from >> http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/nmap/. >>> >>> wget: invalid option -- >>> >>> Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]... >> >> You might want to add `DISABLE_SIZE=YES' to your /etc/make.conf, as the >> fetch's -S option confuses wget. FWIW I use that in connection with >> `FETCH_CMD=wget -c --passive-ftp' in make.conf and it has been working >> for >> a >> long time for me. >> >> -- >> DoubleF >> No virus detected in this message. Ehrm, wait a minute... >> /kernel: pid 56921 (antivirus), uid 32000: exited on signal 9 Oh yes, no >> virus:) >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 2 >> ************************************************* >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 3302 (20080728) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:15:53 +0800 > From: vardyh > Subject: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 > To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org > Message-ID: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi all. > I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added > 'console="comconsole"' > to /boot/loader.conf and I got > 'hptrr: no controller detected.' > on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the > 'console=xxx'. > And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? > I will very appreciate for your help :> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:10:51 +0200 > From: Torbj?rn > Subject: Racoon not identifying host specified in config file > To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org > Message-ID: <488DD36B.8000300@nextline.no> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hello, everyone .. > > Some quick information about the software in use: > Jul 28 15:51:42 fw0 racoon: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.7 > (http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net) > Jul 28 15:51:42 fw0 racoon: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL > 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 (http://www.openssl.org/) > > I'm having a problem with my IPSec configuration. > On one side, everything works out pretty nice. > On the other side, racoon is making bad noises about not finding a > correct configuration. > > "ERROR: couldn't find configuration." > > However, if I kill racoon, and run it in the foreground with debug > output on, I get some more information. > > 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: === > 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: 100 bytes message received from > 81.167.211.58[57413] to 85.200.211.69[500] > 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: > ba9d946f 3cf4cf90 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000064 0d000034 > 00000001 00000001 00000028 01010001 00000020 01010000 800b0001 800c04b0 > 80010005 80030001 80020002 80040002 00000014 afcad713 68a1f1c9 6b8696fc > 77570100 > 2008-07-16 16:06:27: DEBUG: no remote configuration found. > 2008-07-16 16:06:27: ERROR: couldn't find configuration. > > The configuration is pretty straight forward. > > # cat racoon.conf > path pre_shared_key "/var/etc/psk.txt"; > > path certificate "/var/etc"; > > remote 81.167.211.58 { > exchange_mode main; > my_identifier address "85.200.211.69"; > > peers_identifier address 81.167.211.58; > initial_contact on; > support_proxy on; > proposal_check obey; > > proposal { > encryption_algorithm 3des; > hash_algorithm sha1; > authentication_method pre_shared_key; > dh_group 2; > lifetime time 2400 secs; > } > lifetime time 2400 secs; > } > > sainfo address 85.200.211.64/29 any address 192.168.100.0/24 any { > encryption_algorithm 3des,blowfish,cast128,rijndael,rijndael 256; > authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1,hmac_md5; > compression_algorithm deflate; > lifetime time 1200 secs; > } > > Here is the weird thing; if I change that remote stanza to read > > remote anonymous { > blah; > } > > then everything works out nice, racoon even tells me it uses the > anonymous stanza for that correct IP. > > 2008-07-16 16:11:06: DEBUG: anonymous configuration selected for > 81.167.211.58. > > So, to me this seems really odd, how come racoon isn't picking up that > stanza when configured for that specified IP ? > Using the remote stanza is not what I really want .. > > So, does anyone have any ideas on what is going on here ? > Using tcpdump I can see that it is in fact 81.167.211.58 that is coming > through to racoon, on port 500/UDP. > > Thanks for a great product, by the way. > > -- Torbjørn / Nextline > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:12:09 -0500 > From: Jeffrey Goldberg > Subject: Re: Binary upgrade from legacy version + ports > To: Jan Henrik Sylvester > Cc: Svein Halvor Halvorsen , questions-list > freebsd > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > On Jul 28, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > >> Svein wrote: >> > Is there a problem using the prebuilt packages from STABLE on a >> > RELEASE box? If I want to run RELEASE, and still use the latest >> > packages? The ABI is consistent between STABLE and RELEASE, right? >> >> Yes, there is a problem. See my posting here: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html >> >> Unfortunatelly, I have not got an answer, but it is obvious packages >> using this new symbol must fail: > > I recently discovered this through a blunder of my own. I accidently > "updated" a 7-STABLE machine to 7-RELEASE, and discovered, among some > other problems, that sudo failed with the same error you report. > > (I've now put a link to USE-THIS-SUPFiLE to stable-supfile in /usr/ > local/etc/cvsup to avoid the blunder in the future.) > > -j > > -- > Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:30:11 -0700 > From: "Steve Franks" > Subject: Re: new vanilla system fails to install many packages/ports > To: "Kevin Kinsey" > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Message-ID: > <539c60b90807280930tc9f5bdbqadc9c79362e1a39a@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >> Steve Franks wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >>>> >>>> Steve Franks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I must be missing something obvious. About 25% of my dependencies >>>>> fail to install with errors like: >>>>> >>>>> "install-info: /usr/local/info/dir: empty file" >>>>> "pkg-add: command 'install-info --quiet /blah.info' failed" >>>>> >>>>> system is 7.0/i386 >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>> >>>> "info" is GNU-related. Any reason that GNU-stuff, esp. >>>> "info", wouldn't have been installed/built thus far? >>>> (I dunno, but, maybe a csup with the GNU stuff rejected >>>> or commented out ...) >>>> >>> >>> All I did was a "developer" (not x developer) sysinstall off 7.0 disk >>> 1. No tweaking, hacking, or extra packages until I got a clean boot >>> onto the new disk. I'm somewhere between user and power user. I have >>> 5 running freebsd systems under my belt, and was going to do my laptop >>> (I've given up on it several times already - bloody compaq). >>> >>>> And anything these ports have in common (assuming they're >>>> all GNU for starters). They aren't Linuxolator stuff? >>>> >>> >>> Seems to me, they all use gnuinfo instead of manpages? I don't even >>> know what gnuinfo is, nor linuxulator. >>> >> >> Right, GNU programs may have manpages, but they also have >> "info" pages which were developed by GNU as a replacement >> for the UNIX manual (I'm assuming based on past reading ... >> memory ain't all it used to be). >> >> "Linuxulator" or however it's spelled is just a colloquialism >> for the FreeBSD linux emulation. >> >> I've got few guesses for ya. "Developer" package has documentation, >> correct? Or not? >> >> What's "ls -ld /usr/local/info" give? >> >>> (!) Bison won't even install (makes fine, but install fails), and >>> that's pretty darn basic, no? >>> >>> Steve >> >> Yup, 'tis. Tho' I figure someday BSD'ers would like to have >> their own implementation. Again, just a guess. >> >> KDK >> -- >> When all else fails, EAT!!! >> > > Well, > > No idea what the problem was, but portupgrade -aO ... > seems to have made it go away. > > Steve > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:35:17 -0700 > From: "Steve Franks" > Subject: 'stray irq7's cause hang? > To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" > Message-ID: > <539c60b90807280935i50041623pe54b6ad65d5b89b8@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I've got a new system that hangs after about 2 hours - no > ctrl-alt-esc, not ctrl-alt-Fn, no ctrl-alt-delete. > > I tried hints.0.apic.disabled="YES" (that's apic, not acpi) (or > whatever the correct syntax from the handbook is), but I still get the > hang, and the stray irq 7's. As far as I can see, there's no other > dmesg output related. > > Ideas? > > Steve > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:23:04 +0100 > From: Chris Hastie > Subject: Cleaning data off a remote machine > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20080728172304.dk4itqk4aooc80wg@imp.oak-wood.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make > sure I > don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the > best > way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this > removes > the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what ever > I do > from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP console > access. > > Thanks > > -- > Chris Hastie > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:53 +0200 > From: bsd > Subject: amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? > To: Liste FreeBSD > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; > delsp=yes > > Hello folks, > > > I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an amd64 > install. > > It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it > > >> ===> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed under / >> usr/lib32. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. > > > > I don't know how to install such library. > > What should I do ? > > > > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > > P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing > this e-mail" > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:12:25 -0500 > From: "Andrew L. Gould" > Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine > To: Chris Hastie > Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:23, Chris Hastie wrote: > >> I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to >> make sure I >> don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is >> the best >> way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if >> this removes >> the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what >> ever I do >> from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP >> console >> access. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Chris Hastie > > Is there anyone onsite that you could trust to run DBAN (Derik's Boot > And Nuke)? > > Andrew > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:14:45 +0100 > From: Matthew Seaman > Subject: Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 > To: vardyh > Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > vardyh wrote: >> Hi all. >> I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added >> 'console="comconsole"' >> to /boot/loader.conf and I got >> 'hptrr: no controller detected.' >> on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the >> 'console=xxx'. >> And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? >> I will very appreciate for your help :> > > This is just the driver for the HighPoint Rocket Raid controller being > a bit too verbose. It's detected that you don't have anything compatible > with hptrr(4) and (unlike the usual behaviour of most Raid Controller > drivers (or drivers for any sort of hardware really)) it considers this > fact to be of such vital importance that it really had to print out > something on the console. Needless to say such behaviour has already been > quashed in 7-STABLE and will not appear in 7.1-RELEASE. > > In other words, it's harmless and you can just ignore it. > > I suspect that this output wasn't actually triggered by your changing > the console setting -- there's no conceivable way changing one should > affect the other -- but that changing the way the boot messages are > displayed has managed to draw your attention to it. You probably had it > before but never noticed. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 258 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080728/6bd93bb6/signature-0001.pgp > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:58 +0200 > From: bsd > Subject: Re: Deinstalling X and all dependencies[SOLVED] > To: Liste FreeBSD > Message-ID: <91610C8C-EAC6-49C0-9CAB-D5836592A08E@todoo.biz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; > delsp=yes > > I have opted for the: > > pkg_delete -a > > Which has done a great job cleaning everything. > Only had to "make clean" in one of the port directory to properly > recompile all needed apps. > > As I had configured root to use /usr/local/bin/bash had to take care > to change that with vipw before doing the uninstall / reinstall. > > > Took me half a day for three servers. But at least I have a very clean > install with 30 ports instead of 250 !! > > > Thanks everybody for your wise answers. > > > Le 27 juil. 08 à 15:17, andrew clarke a écrit : > >> On Sun 2008-07-27 12:52:56 UTC+0200, bsd (bsd@todoo.biz) wrote: >> >>> I have just received a new system that's planned to be a large >>> scale DNS >>> server. >>> I have asked the guy who has setup the hardware not to install X? >>> >>> This has been useless!! >>> >>> I am now ending up with 250 apps in the port tree!! >> >> He probably just went with the defaults. >> >>> Is there a good way to get rid of all these useless apps without >>> breaking the system? >>> What would you suggest? >>> >>> Like removing X and It's dependencies? >>> >>> >>> I can also remove all apps in the port tree and recompile only the >>> one >>> needed? >>> >>> What's best what do you suggest. >> >> FreeBSD provides a "base system" with software such as a SSH daemon, >> Sendmail, BIND, etc. You can uninstall all the packages on your >> system, but the FreeBSD base system will still remain. This allows >> FreeBSD to boot normally without any packages installed. >> >> I recommend you uninstall all packages (with 'pkg_delete -a', or >> 'pkg_delete -av' if you want to watch all the files being deleted), >> then install only what you need from the Ports tree. >> >> Your DNS server should probably not require any packages to be >> installed, as DNS server software (BIND) is provided with the FreeBSD >> base system. But that really depends what your requirements are. >> >> Regards >> Andrew > > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > > P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing > this e-mail" > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar > Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine > To: Chris Hastie > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20080728192801.X44373@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > >> don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the >> best >> way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this >> removes >> the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what ever >> I do >> from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMoIP >> console >> access. > remove all your files, then > > > cat /dev/zero >file > > on every partition > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:37:24 +0200 > From: Roland Smith > Subject: Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine > To: Chris Hastie > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20080728173724.GA19106@slackbox.xs4all.nl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Chris Hastie wrote: >> I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make >> sure I >> don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the >> best >> way to remove all data from the hard drive? > > Remove the harddive and move a seriously strong magnet over it. This > will render the drive unreadable and useless, since it will also destroy > the servo control data used for locating the tracks. > >> I have no problem if this removes the OS along the way, but ideally I >> would like to be able to do what ever I do from an SSH session. > > The security/wipe port comes to mind. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 195 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080728/5a050cd3/attachment-0001.pgp > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:45:02 -0400 > From: "Jean-Paul Natola" > Subject: OT: Custmoize VNC > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > Message-ID: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E9703639@www.fcimail.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to customize > vnc > but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside the > lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will automatically, > upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # > etc..) > > I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't bookmark > the > page, any help would be appreciated > > > TIA > JP > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:35:27 +0530 > From: "N. Raghavendra" > Subject: LispWorks Personal on FreeBSD 7 > To: FreeBSD Users Questions > Message-ID: <86fxpuym5k.fsf@riemann.mri.ernet.in> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Recently I had some difficulty in installing the Common Lisp > implementation LispWorks Personal 5.1 on FreeBSD 7, and am posting my > experience here. It may be useful to others, if any, interested in > running this CL implementation on FreeBSD 7. The problem was due to > the fact that LW depends on several libraries from FreeBSD 5 and 6. > Following suggestions on the LW mailing list, the right installation > sequence seems to be: > > 1. Ensure that the kernel options `COMPAT_FREEBSD5' and > `COMPAT_FREEBSD6' are on. > > 2. Install the ports `misc/compat5x' and `misc/compat6x'. > > 3. Install the package `compatXm-6.3_1.tgz'. > > 4. Install the package `lispworks-personal-5.1.tgz'. > > The packages in 3 and 4 are available from the LispWorks FTP server. > There's more information in the LW Knowledge Base article at > http://www.lispworks.com/kb/67634814074628b180257490005cb9d3.html and > in the LW mailing list thread > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.lispworks.general/8422 which also > describes some minor tweaking of LD_LIBRARY_PATH that was needed. > > Raghavendra. > > -- > N. Raghavendra | http://www.retrotexts.net/ > Harish-Chandra Research Institute | http://www.mri.ernet.in/ > See message headers for contact and OpenPGP information. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:51:04 -0400 > From: kalin m > Subject: pci compliance > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488E0708.2060207@godfur.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > hi all... > > i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... > > is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at > the time of pci compliance scanning? > i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself > on that machine and didn't find anything interesting. > but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for > said "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more > intrusive". anybody knows what does that mean? > > thanks... > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:01:14 +0200 > From: bsd > Subject: Re: amavisd-new needs lib32 on amd64 ? > To: Liste FreeBSD > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; > delsp=yes > > Ok, > > After digging a little bit more into the code, It seems that It was > due to rar decompile which is a 32bit ports; > > I uncommented the rar options for this port and It went ok. > > I would still be interested in a more detailed answer to my own > question regarding 32/64 bit compatibility. > > > Sincerly yours. > > G.B. > > > Le 28 juil. 08 à 19:10, bsd a écrit : > >> Hello folks, >> >> >> I am trying to install amavisd-new for filtering purposes on an >> amd64 install. >> >> It complains at compile startup not to be able to install it >> >> >>> ===> amavisd-new-2.6.1,1 requires 32-bit libraries installed >>> under /usr/lib32. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/security/amavisd-new. >> >> >> >> I don't know how to install such library. >> >> What should I do ? >> >> >> >> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ >> Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD >> bsd @at@ todoo.biz >> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ >> >> P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing >> this e-mail" >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >> " > > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > > P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing > this e-mail" > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:02:40 +0200 > From: "Ross Cameron" > Subject: Re: pci compliance > To: "kalin m" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > <35f70db10807281102q5a0b73c3h554338292e3b751a@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: > >> hi all... >> >> i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... >> >> is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at >> the time of pci compliance scanning? >> i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself >> on >> that machine and didn't find anything interesting. >> but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for >> said >> "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". >> anybody knows what does that mean? >> >> thanks... > > > The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. > It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. > > Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make sure u > pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:24:56 -0400 > From: kalin m > Subject: Re: pci compliance > To: ross.cameron@linuxpro.co.za > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <488E0EF8.4030305@godfur.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > cool. thanks. i couldn't find anything on google under that name but > i've been looking and reading on a lot of documentation on line and print. > so i was just asking if there are any things that pertain in particular > to the freebsd os that need to be addressed before the scanning. > > how full of a penetration can you have if (almost) all incoming ports > are blocked? > > thanks.... > > > > Ross Cameron wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: >> >> >>> hi all... >>> >>> i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci compliance... >>> >>> is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected at >>> the time of pci compliance scanning? >>> i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did myself >>> on >>> that machine and didn't find anything interesting. >>> but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for >>> said >>> "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more intrusive". >>> anybody knows what does that mean? >>> >>> thanks... >>> >> >> >> The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. >> It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. >> >> Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make sure u >> pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:22:46 -0400 > From: "Bob McConnell" > Subject: RE: pci compliance > To: > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Behalf Of Ross Cameron >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:51 PM, kalin m wrote: >>> >>> i'm about to submit a freebsd system to be scanned for pci > compliance... >>> >>> is there any particular gotchas with bsd systems that can be detected > at >>> the time of pci compliance scanning? >>> i know they use something like nmap if not nmap itself and i did > myself on >>> that machine and didn't find anything interesting. >>> but one of the consultants that was 'advising' the company i work for > said >>> "we use similar (as in nmap) approach but it's (much) more > intrusive". >>> anybody knows what does that mean? >> >> The PCI auditing process is a full penetration test. >> It's very thorough and not at all easy to pass. >> >> Get hold of a copy of "The penetration tester's handbook" and make > sure u >> pass all the tests in the book and u should be ok > > How intense depends on which PCI level you are aiming for and which > services you will have running on that server. We have completed level 3 > for our hosted web servers and firewalls, and are shooting for level 1 > by the end of the calendar year. However, I am not yet involved in any > of those projects. > > Bob McConnell > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 21 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:49 +0000 (UTC) > From: Juan Carlos Villalobos > Subject: Component-based Operating System. > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Message-ID: > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > Hello, > > I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just wanted > to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on Components. > > I appreciate your input on this. > > Thanks > > > irobot@sdf.lonestar.org > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 22 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:57:37 +0200 > From: Ivan Voras > Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just wanted >> to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on Components. >> >> I appreciate your input on this. > > "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating system > consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the > kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomic > and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more > specific to get a more specific answer. > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 250 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20080728/a1b4331f/signature-0001.pgp > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 23 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:58:07 +0200 > From: "Ross Cameron" > Subject: Re: pci compliance > To: "kalin m" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > <35f70db10807281158m1fa96b39o3d56f19b772ee6fa@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, kalin m wrote: > >> cool. thanks. i couldn't find anything on google under that name but >> i've >> been looking and reading on a lot of documentation on line and print. >> so i was just asking if there are any things that pertain in particular >> to >> the freebsd os that need to be addressed before the scanning. >> >> how full of a penetration can you have if (almost) all incoming ports are >> blocked? >> >> thanks.... >> > > Depends on the PCI level you are being audited for. > > But there are any number of attacks you can throw at a box thats fully > closed up, and the aim is not to get it but rather to chew up all the ram > and cpu and kill the box off. > > I suggest you read the PCI compliance document for the relevant level and > make sure you test the system to comply with the documented requirements. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 24 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:50:19 +0200 > From: Kris Kennaway > Subject: Re: 'stray irq7's cause hang? > To: stevefranks@ieee.org > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Message-ID: <488E22FB.60203@FreeBSD.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Steve Franks wrote: >> I've got a new system that hangs after about 2 hours - no >> ctrl-alt-esc, not ctrl-alt-Fn, no ctrl-alt-delete. >> >> I tried hints.0.apic.disabled="YES" (that's apic, not acpi) (or >> whatever the correct syntax from the handbook is), but I still get the >> hang, and the stray irq 7's. As far as I can see, there's no other >> dmesg output related. > > The stray interrupts may be a red herring. "Stray" means that no driver > is handling them, and so there is no driver to screw up :) > > I see straq irq 7's on a HP proliant blade system, and also the hard > hangs (it doesn't even reply to a NMI; this means it is almost certainly > a hardware error). However I am now fairly certain the hangs are > associated to disk failure. Several of the blades that were hanging > went on to develop DMA errors from ATA, and after I validated the > remaining systems with smartctl and took offline yet more blades that > failed the self-tests, I have not had the problem recur. > > Kris > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 25 > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:08:51 -0400 > From: Greg Larkin > Subject: Re: OT: Custmoize VNC > To: Jean-Paul Natola > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > Message-ID: <488E2753.5020002@FreeBSD.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > | I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to > customize vnc > | but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside > the > | lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will > automatically, > | upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # > etc..) > | > | I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't > bookmark the > | page, any help would be appreciated > | > | > | TIA > | JP > > Hi Jean-Paul, > > I Googled for "VNC connection manager" and this site was on the first > page: > > http://www.s-code.com/products/vncmanager/compare.aspx > > Is that something like what you're looking for? > > Best regards, > Greg > - -- > Greg Larkin > http://www.sourcehosting.net/ > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIjidT0sRouByUApARAiN/AKCBtdJajfcP+KiMfen69UK+pnMJkQCgxwSL > osLEeFxovY0w89v/KVWYB9o= > =EQ7G > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 3 > ************************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 06:25:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59FA106567C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from smadev.internal.net (host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DA98FC1C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T6P1IA006805; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:25:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6T6P0uL006801; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:25:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: Manolis Kiagias Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:24:59 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <48849FFD.10285.C71CED5@iwrtech.iwr.ru.ac.za> <200807221443.16879.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <4885CAE9.5080301@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4885CAE9.5080301@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807290924.59932.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Cc: Tore Lund , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monitoring CPU temperature: mbmon shows 201 degrees C X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:25:04 -0000 Just to summarize (after 5.5 days of uptime), i'd like to recap on what happened next. I burned the SiS 651 based motherboard, while memtesting, and i replaced it with a new Asrock, Intel 82865G based motherboard. All run fine, no panics, no unexpected segfaults. It seems that the old SiS was fine until i fitted the kodicom4400 on the PCI bus, when all the problems started. Now at idle i can get CPU temps as low as 35 deg Celsious, altho it turned out that was not my problem in the first place. Thank you all for your help. Manoli Euxaristw! -- Achilleas Mantzios From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 06:42:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8F21065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2728FC1B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so5071968fkk.11 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Aae7O7k2Fu1k4MjlRQ8EH9f3Z8CFx9xDLepjhsmuubk=; b=XYq3u1YG2aTbfFTL3WS8zOaTJnUsZOV+PuwMpncT1eaSpPos2DnGdYkLQeOWteu0On apOF+d/pKV6py3e3eyXKyAqnzR+vAZd0I5qIPF7E64+72Ot1eaqPJAIeAhEMHbWadcuf TTE8YsKnmwRmJy8PpZ12q1hXWegofqN4ivmGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RL0hkOotKtLOmwgEfMr2WUZ12/Kj85JtCZFy2NvXAzFz9J1VTigM1SO5ZWcRmLlWDA DuhGtIi0LaORpuTsH+YY+WDVFNhW2QpbEDyf9HL9KLqdWEdHEmW7SoVlRk7EJiqRLM/l k6BJeYsfnk/xYIkpfc9v0/VqX/fi6Pu4uIrs0= Received: by 10.181.27.7 with SMTP id e7mr1873495bkj.17.1217313748777; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [85.72.121.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm25177255fks.9.2008.07.28.23.42.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488EBBD1.4040507@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:42:25 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Achilleas Mantzios References: <48849FFD.10285.C71CED5@iwrtech.iwr.ru.ac.za> <200807221443.16879.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <4885CAE9.5080301@gmail.com> <200807290924.59932.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <200807290924.59932.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tore Lund , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monitoring CPU temperature: mbmon shows 201 degrees C X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:42:31 -0000 Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > Just to summarize (after 5.5 days of uptime), i'd like to recap on what happened next. > I burned the SiS 651 based motherboard, while memtesting, and i replaced it with > a new Asrock, Intel 82865G based motherboard. > Hey, I have three of these! One of them is running www.freebsdgr.org I've never had problems with this mobo and FreeBSD. > All run fine, no panics, no unexpected segfaults. > It seems that the old SiS was fine until i fitted the kodicom4400 on the PCI bus, > when all the problems started. > Now at idle i can get CPU temps as low as 35 deg Celsious, altho it turned out that was not my problem > in the first place. > > An average of 35-37 is my usual idle temperature too (www.freebsdgr.org/status.php) > Thank you all for your help. > Manoli Euxaristw! > No prb :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:22:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AF21065672 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C4C8FC5D for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so2308248tid.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BATmq0fAbZ4KoDwCbTyanthWXpR/2kpGU6l+bq9tqQQ=; b=YTcLCqglGuQQKm6l4HHskPDcch8vo7Q2rP83mbjszrjSyeP7gsOT55JZyTUMz57yoT a8soG+kFbs7ZoX2QgB0tgaI6vgjoYff6Dz8a568Kjd5OGylnWxR30q2XnynO6eSMf7fk KqDhl99v8vRK8+phWSiCOiAFlWbEsQdSXRmAM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QdL0jNhNyNUJSJVHomi0dTl9tM/ignLj7w3OI3olm7DrdLzyRszq7OjkfiiEghXOdO Ah4JQEQkhxfNpHaGmF1CmhKhS64puJhcTlNJ4o+zMzEksZBSPSkw1epFSJabItLrNWiy gbmOoVX3eHPIMuhiQ8UjmLeAeOxUTVwb9Jct8= Received: by 10.110.20.17 with SMTP id 17mr7235641tit.12.1217319718550; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [221.223.111.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm32886459tid.12.2008.07.29.01.21.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488ED323.9050303@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:21:55 +0800 From: vardyh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:03 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > vardyh wrote: >> Hi all. >> I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added >> 'console="comconsole"' >> to /boot/loader.conf and I got >> 'hptrr: no controller detected.' >> on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the >> 'console=xxx'. >> And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? >> I will very appreciate for your help :> > > This is just the driver for the HighPoint Rocket Raid controller being > a bit too verbose. It's detected that you don't have anything compatible > with hptrr(4) and (unlike the usual behaviour of most Raid Controller > drivers (or drivers for any sort of hardware really)) it considers > this fact to be of such vital importance that it really had to print out > something on the console. Needless to say such behaviour has already > been quashed in 7-STABLE and will not appear in 7.1-RELEASE. > > In other words, it's harmless and you can just ignore it. > I suspect that this output wasn't actually triggered by your changing > the console setting -- there's no conceivable way changing one should > affect the other -- but that changing the way the boot messages are > displayed has managed to draw your attention to it. You probably had > it before but never noticed. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > But, actually it claimed that no controller detected and asked me to specify the root filesystem manually, which wrote: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Manul root filesystem specification: : Mount using filesystem eg. ufs:da0s1a ? List valid disk boot devices Abort manual input I tried ufs:/dev/ad0s1a, which was the real root filesystem registered in my /etc/fstab, but it still could not be mounted. And the same direction came out again to asked me to point out the root fs. I tried '?' also, but it seems that no disk devices were found... The kernel told me "List of GEOM managed disk devices:", and nothing but the same old direction followed. ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 09:40:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242591065676 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net (lk.84.20.249.154.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net [84.20.249.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500DE8FC19 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCB5B943 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:31:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (delusion.skoberne.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69972-03 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:31:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (pisarna.iskreni.net [213.143.68.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nejkopejko@skoberne.net) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF69B940 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:31:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <488EE38B.1060202@skoberne.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:31:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nejc_=A9koberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Subject: pf randomly blocks specific packets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:40:27 -0000 Hello, I have a FreeBSD 7.0 system with jails (and services in them). In one of the jails there is an Apache server, which also runs on the host system (and forwards traffic using mod_proxy to the jailed Apache). Everything works as expected, I only have problems with pf which seems to block certain packets randomly (not all of them). This is how my rc.conf on host system looks like (relevant parts): --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defaultrouter="172.20.2.1" ifconfig_em0="inet 172.20.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" pf_enable="YES" pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" pf_flags="" pflog_enable="YES" pflog_logfile="/var/log/pflog" pflog_flags="" apache22_enable="YES" cloned_interfaces="lo1" ifconfig_lo1="192.168.223.1" jail_enable="YES" jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" jail_list="mail" jail_mail_rootdir="/usr/jail/j/mail" jail_mail_hostname="mail" jail_mail_ip="192.168.223.10" jail_mail_interface="lo1 netmask 255.255.255.0" jail_mail_devfs_enable="YES" jail_mail_procfs_enable="YES" jail_mail_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is how my pf.conf looks like: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- int_Trust = "em0" int_Loop = "lo0" int_Jails = "lo1" int_jail_mail = "{" $int_Trust "}" addr_net_Private = "{ 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8 }" addr_net_Local = "{" $int_Trust:network ", 172.20.2.0/24, 192.168.0.0/16 }" addr_sysSvarun = "a.b.c.d" addr_jail_mail = "192.168.223.10" svc_TCP_HOST_Private = "{ ssh, iwebmin, itelnet }" svc_TCP_HOST_Public = "{ ssh, http, https, domain }" svc_UDP_HOST_Public = "{ domain }" svc_TCP_jail_mail = "{ smtp, smtps, pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps }" ICMPTypes = "echoreq" AllProtocols = "{ tcp, udp, ipv6, icmp, esp, ipencap, gre }" table persist file "/usr/local/etc/trusted.addresses" set loginterface $int_Trust scrub on $int_Trust all no-df random-id reassemble tcp nat on $int_Trust from $int_Jails:network to any -> $int_Trust rdr pass on $int_jail_mail proto tcp from any to $int_jail_mail port \ $svc_TCP_jail_mail -> $addr_jail_mail block log all pass in quick on $int_Trust from $addr_sysSvarun to any keep state pass quick on $int_Loop all pass quick on $int_Jails all pass quick inet proto icmp all icmp-type $ICMPTypes keep state pass in on $int_Trust from any to any keep state pass out on $int_Trust from any to $addr_net_Local keep state pass out on $int_Trust from $int_Trust to any keep state pass out on lo1 from 192.168.223.10 to 192.168.223.10 keep state --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So as you can see there is a "pass quick on $int_Jails all" line. Which, as far as I understand, should do exactly that. But, when I do "tcpdump -n -r /var/log/pflog", I get these: 10:22:56.353027 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:23:06.744057 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:23:27.330096 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:23:47.918481 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:24:08.508126 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:24:29.096918 IP 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:12.341285 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 1457218003:1457218003(0) ack 1764186631 win 8960 10:33:12.637811 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:13.029827 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:13.609705 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:14.561443 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:16.256344 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:19.073348 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:24.504722 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:35.163039 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:33:56.274140 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:34:38.293842 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:35:20.310801 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:36:02.326561 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 10:36:44.339793 IP 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 8960 or, if I pass "-e -ttt" parameters to tcpdump as well, these: rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.53777 > 192.168.223.10.80: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 1457218003:1457218003(0) ack 1764186631 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: F 0:0(0) ack 1 win 8960 rule 0/0(match): block out on lo1: 192.168.223.10.51214 > 192.168.223.10.80: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 8960 Which means, pf blocks these packets. Why would this be? The consequence of blocking these packets are, that I get this in the hosts's Apache server: [Fri Jul 25 09:57:10 2008] [error] (1)Operation not permitted: proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 192.168.223.10:80 (mail) failed [Fri Jul 25 09:57:10 2008] [error] ap_proxy_connect_backend disabling worker for (mail) [Fri Jul 25 09:57:10 2008] [error] proxy: HTTP: disabled connection for (mail) which disables connections to the jailed Apache for a while. Which is very annoying. However, this (that Apache get's blocked) doesn't happen always, I would say 10-20 times daily. Any ideas? Thanks, Nejc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 11:13:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6122B106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3636E8FC18 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so2912462wah.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:13:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4G+enWCuoGb2iijj6VvFq7PId4F7xz1mjZd+BHfBkt4=; b=dtcZnlkJn2Ipkj7j/M9CuhK3ot4F4H13mOwdhKtXyI2v/ujBzHqgXcI7+PIfwwiixX wXzDTvtvQD8i+ipzQJq7a/Msbc3jk05M0R+pL6bnIH/I4ny++rPTTOEeY6rtUCLJNu4l ZIkqYaNCNYLZKsYoSAEj0u+Bo/9OZyagVT9+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vCl7hKIASvgWl1XLTfXA42X83FY/xAHNvM39vXjEhYm68MhM6S3Ag8dnFqVM/zxSb9 dB6Fx+eth8ncnYQJt6t7yafZixA7rSU5ppsiGv7Fb+y2Ao8pkP1N+KOHiTnmSc0kI5Rh C3+aSSauPeTG8eRomYIKD4jkI5+CGPl7T4RoU= Received: by 10.114.79.18 with SMTP id c18mr6316836wab.86.1217330035630; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.153.18 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:13:55 +0300 From: "Odhiambo Washington" To: alydiomc@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cc: darko gavrilovic , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:13:56 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:07 AM, lyd mc wrote: > Hi darko, > > What I mean is adding a disclaimer/boilerplate for any outgoing message just like mimedefang feature. However, I don't want it to be redundant. For example if a mail already contains my disclaimer (usually mail from a reply message), it should be relocated next to the new message not at the bottom of the reply message. > > new message body > new message body > > Disclaimer <---- new location of disclaimer > > ---------------old messages ---------------------- > > old message > old message > > Disclaimer <--- to be relocated > I can tell you it is "impossible". Why? While you can actually write a script to try to do it, you'll more likely end up breaking the e-mail format, because it will not be too easy to rightly guess the content-type/boundaries in replies. Well, take a look at procmail, with a client like mutt... you can do fancy things, but not the type you want! -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!" --from a /. post From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 11:53:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D3D106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13718FC0C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl121-117.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.240.117]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6TBqj5E004439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:52:51 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6TBqinc002712; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:52:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6TBqh5N002711; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:52:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <84492.1217303289@tristatelogic.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:52:43 +0300 In-Reply-To: <84492.1217303289@tristatelogic.com> (Ronald F. Guilmette's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:09 -0700") Message-ID: <87d4kwzz3o.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6TBqj5E004439 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.803, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.60, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two minor IPFW-related questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:53:00 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:09 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: >On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:15:32 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: >> deny any to any in frag >> >> Is that actually a Good Thing To Do? Are there really no legitimate >> packate fragments out there on the Internet? > > First, on one particular machine of mine, I'm seeing a fair number... > many dozens or so per hour... of /var/log/security logfile entries for > ipfw-rejected packet fragments. This is on a machine that has a very > busy name server. [...] The majority of the rejected "frag" packets > are UDP packets, and I've just now determined that many/most/all of > those are coming from actual name servers elsewhere. It's fairly non-trivial to make TCP fragments (TCP tries its best to avoid fragmentation and it splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic, not how many bytes the user application wrote). So it's "normal" to see mostly UDP fragments. > In short, I do believe that these packet fragments are mostly (or > entirely) perfectly legitimate packet fragments... probably partial > answers to DNS queries that the nameserver on this machine sent out. DNS will fallback to TCP when UDP fails (i.e. when an answer datagram is too large for UDP to deliver). So I might consider dropping them anyway. > So now, given that I understand (or believe I do, anyway) everything > that you, Giorgos, said about the possibility of a DoS attack based on > packet fragmentation, and given that I _do not_ believe that anybody > has it in mind to do a DoS against me at the present time (either > using packet fragements or any other sort of DoS technique) is it > really wise for me to be dropping all of these DNS response packet > fragments? Wouldn't I be better off letting them in? It depends on why/when the fragmentation occured. If a name server is sitting behind a link with a small MTU or a link with a bit of data loss, losing one fragment means that *all* fragments must be transmitted again. In those cases relying on the capability of DNS to fallback on TCP may be a slightly better choice. > I'm most particularly concerned about the possibility that... because > I have ipfw dropping all fragments... I may be completely losing some > DNS responses that I actually do want No that's fine. You may get a delayed response, when DNS decides to switch to TCP, or a timeout if the whole "try UDP, fail, try TCP, fail" dance takes too long. But in that case plain UDP would have failed anyway, so you are just given an extra chance with TCP queries. > OK, one last question. I've just read the helpful little brief tutorial > about path MTU discovery... which Google helped me to find: > > http://www.netheaven.com/pmtu.html > > This is kinda sorta enlightening about why most of the fragments that > my ipfw is currently rejecting are either at offset 1472 or at offset > 1480... but not quite. What's the significance of these specific > offset numbers (1472 and 1480)? Is there some particular kind of > hardware or well-known- phenomenon (like the one described in the > document above) that commonly produces fragments with those specific > offsets, i.e. 1472 and 1480? The two "standard" Ethernet encapsulation formats ("IEEE 802.2/802.3" vs. "RFC 894") specify how data is laid out in an Ethernet 'frame'. The encapsulated data areas in the two frame formats can hold: IEEE 802.2/802.3 38-1492 bytes of data RFC 894 46-1500 bytes of data The numbers you are seeing are 20 bytes less than the maximum, because they account for the minimum IP header of 20 bytes. With a minimal IP header of 20 bytes, without any IP options, the two Ethernet frame formats can hold 1472 and 1480 bytes of IP-encapsulated data. That's the "magic" reason for the fragment sizes you see. In reality the full-path MTU may be even smaller for a variety of reasons, but that's another thing :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 12:42:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06237106566C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@kocherfamily.org) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986068FC12 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@kocherfamily.org) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q2so147341uge.37 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.165.14 with SMTP id s14mr345042mko.95.1217333762523; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.122.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e3f5d680807290516j25953436ic46ca9be50ca1841@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:16:02 -0500 From: "Troy Kocher" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: loader.conf issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:42:54 -0000 Listers, For some reason my kernel setting aren't being recognized. . tao# more loader.conf geom_vinum_load="YES" kern.ipc.semmni=256 kern.ipc.semmns=512 kern.ipc.semmnu=256 kern.ipc.semmap=256 kern.ipc.shmall=32768 kern.ipc.shmmax=100000000 On reboot shmall & shmmax have to be set manually. What did I do wrong? Thanks Troy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 13:20:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EA01065679 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF28FC19 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.freebsd.questions@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so3851265wfg.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=zo/l3lsJhpB52BQG3yQ3JHSb4rtDROuJA3mWm8zGn5I=; b=wsrJeQ9nbK7QHbiZ2X4KXNhSd3/QUNlswnuqsNk9+YDY059E0KYMsQSOlp0qf4/3kT kEi2Lms6/5Oq2+WkLKl3dXVzTorqFySmJ/c/QuIlXVMm1TtG9dmPnH9uE2uaFdmEe8mA lMeAuQvtV/29FNYWIJ6ZDg4106Qs59CBYyQAI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cRjVMDF6XoSaQIo8BkB85kjaF0awFeKtjV1yyRj/hgCTNh9hro+6GaK54eRlgQPI60 ffzUZHtQsNu5Yys0H7EpuOcuA/Xw3QrFMU7Du/QmZPR7+sVv4YiQ08vDiYE90i06rKNI 0YLsxXFgceOVLYw74PfiXrtEuuKdkWVDWUDfE= Received: by 10.142.177.5 with SMTP id z5mr2054601wfe.248.1217337631414; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.88.2 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10549b080807290620k38349cf3i75b62d1f29dac57b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:20:31 -0400 From: "FreeBSD Questions" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: The FreeBSD Architecture Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:20:31 -0000 One more book question... Is there anything significant to gain from reading both "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System" and "The FreeBSD Architecture Handbook"? I've skimmed the tables of contents for both books, and there seems to be some overlap in topics. What I don't know is if the details are redundant or if there's useful information to glean by reading both as opposed to just one or the other. Thank you, everyone, for your input! I really do appreciate you sharing your thoughts. Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 13:35:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421561065672 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmettee@pchotshots.com) Received: from mail.pchotshots.com (ns1.pchotshots.com [12.172.123.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69828FC23 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmettee@pchotshots.com) Received: (qmail 50641 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2008 13:34:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dev2.pchotshots.com) (bmettee@12.172.123.228) by mail.pchotshots.com with ESMTPA; 29 Jul 2008 13:34:49 -0000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20080729093018.00af4d08@mail.pchotshots.com> X-Sender: bmettee@pchotshots.com@mail.pchotshots.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:35:03 -0400 To: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Brad Mettee In-Reply-To: <20080729025631.GC96894@thought.org> References: <20080728222750.O3537@tripel.monochrome.org> <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <20080728221623.R3537@tripel.monochrome.org> <20080728222750.O3537@tripel.monochrome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:35:04 -0000 DVI = Digital Visual Interface (aka Digital Video Interface) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Visual_Interface Basically instead of sending analog signals from PC to monitor, it's a digital data stream. You won't get any distortion between source and destination. At 10:56 PM 7/28/2008, you wrote: >On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:30:22PM -0400, Chris Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Chris Hill wrote: > > > > >On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > >>[snip] whatever display i get has to have dual capability. both > > >>digital and analog-- eventually I'll need a new KVM box. > > >> > > >>so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? > > > > > >I've been using a ViewSonic VP930b for a few years, and been very > > >happy with it. It has two VGA inputs, no DVI. Probably not made > > >anymore so I guess that's moot. > > > > - Replying to my own post like a tool - > > > > This monitor does in fact have a DVI input in addition to the two VGAs. > > Don't know if that counts as 'digital' or not. > > > > > while i can still TYPE today:: the fact is that i was a hardware > major, not software. > but got shuffled into pporting an f77 compiler for my > intership.... now, i know almost > Zero about hardware, so no clue what this "dvi input" > means. sad, isnt it? > > .... > > > -- > > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > >-- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Brad Mettee PC HotShots, Inc. Baltimore, MD (410) 426-7617 -> Let us bring out the *Power* of your PCs. <- -> Custom Business Software Solutions since 1991 <- visit http://www.pchotshots.com for information about our company. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 13:43:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1131065690 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143E18FC28 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from vhoffman-macbook.lon.namesco.net (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m6TDhCuX046411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:43:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <488F1E72.2010805@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:43:14 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Troy Kocher References: <1e3f5d680807290516j25953436ic46ca9be50ca1841@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1e3f5d680807290516j25953436ic46ca9be50ca1841@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loader.conf issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:43:17 -0000 Troy Kocher wrote: > Listers, > > For some reason my kernel setting aren't being recognized. . > > tao# more loader.conf > geom_vinum_load="YES" > kern.ipc.semmni=256 > kern.ipc.semmns=512 > kern.ipc.semmnu=256 > kern.ipc.semmap=256 > kern.ipc.shmall=32768 > kern.ipc.shmmax=100000000 > > On reboot shmall & shmmax have to be set manually. > > What did I do wrong? > > Try adding them to /etc/sysctl.conf instead? > Thanks > > Troy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 13:56:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909FF1065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CDB8FC1C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45729145B91; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:56:02 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: SZ1NSJH+E1kWZNEXXNkRf7oe5TjF634LKEIj9Q8QT8No 1217339761 Received: from hagrid.ewd.goldmark.org (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2418026F32; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:56:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Jeffrey Goldberg To: Odhiambo Washington In-Reply-To: <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:56:00 -0500 References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) Cc: alydiomc@yahoo.com, darko gavrilovic , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:03 -0000 On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I can tell you it is "impossible". Why? > While you can actually write a script to try to do it, you'll more > likely end up breaking the e-mail format, because it will not be too > easy to rightly guess the content-type/boundaries in replies. If one converted all messages to mutlipart/mixed and added the disclaimer as text/plain part with a content-disposition: inline, then you might be able to safely ensure that each message had exactly one copy of the disclaimer. But any script will have to be fully and completely aware of all MIME structures, so using various perl libraries is where I would start. But of course you are right in that if you were replying to an unsnipped reply there is no way to know the structure of the quoted material in the first reply, so removing it from the quoted section may well be impossible to do reliably. On a side note, I'm wondering if the original poster is familiar with the arguments presented in http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ I haven't updated that in years, but I think that the points still hold. -j From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 14:43:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434B61065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4DC8FC1C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 17108 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 14:43:36 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 29 Jul 2008 14:43:36 -0000 Message-ID: <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:59 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:43:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> so what are the top few makes of LCDs out there? > > I have several (6) Samsung SyncMaster 941BW monitors > I am very Happy with them I'd never purchased any 19" displays. About 5 years back, i was in the market for 3 2-" units, and like I usually do with any major $ investments, I investigated the applicable specs, then compared prices underneath that. At that time, the 20" LCDs from Dell were the best buy, purchasing them from Ebay made it also a *very* good deal. The only problem there is, the little group of folks selling those Dell monitors had organized several shell-games on Ebay, running some *very* easy to fall into frauds, so you needed to be really careful. Twice, I ran into the game of getting dome shill to run the price of a monitor I was interested way past what I wanted to pay, then when I let the deal walk away from me, the con-people wrote and tried to convince me that i'd won the "Second chance" purchase, and that I'd obligated myself to pay the price they'd bid it up to. I complained to Ebay, but (as usual) Ebay was deaf about it. It's easy to avoid this, but you need to be aware of the scam, which is still operating today. How do I know? Because one of those 3 20" displays went bad on me 4 weeks ago, and I replaced it with a 24" model. That new model has automatic PiP, too. I really like the Dell, both because of their outstanding contrast and brightness, no dead pixels in any of my LCDs, and the fact that they come with multiple interfaces which are switch selectable from the front panel. The old 20" units had 4 jacks (RCA, S-Video, VGA, and DVI). Really convenient. The new 24" one, beyond being able to run native 1920X1080 for HiDef Video, it's got about 10 different jacks. Looks it up the web, the Dell pages describe it best, and the contrast on that 24" has to be seen to be believed. I actually turned it down! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiPLK8ACgkQz62J6PPcoOnz7QCfTLY9jazfYlcseoP+i71R9C6I hVIAnAzBPlvTS/EspPAPwwJVIKEfg5So =QVya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 15:34:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEC4106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6214F8FC1D for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so4562918fgb.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=0Nc65NRQVVSpu5OwjYFP2QuKoRb07qLDQ3XBI1SRhuc=; b=ndsDpAtRLpWNru+S/pU6InZiXg4BGXEo/zIay2wtVEFqPQ0DUyxggox7ys2Nw60E8u tS6+5eSy/Y+kcqmvwmQoQrj59iqGkpMOHwBg+B+ZhbIMmV4r4iW/oHIpScd5bWhge7gA h1PcBR2g0BFUSU4wSzlLAmhIr/LBo41bvN4zg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Mv6IZcqLCcyk+qLNmI1NVKjhdOHuFFgs8Ft+VCigFmQnqE2DChJe0FMGTvrigah1N8 TIWFH6rbieu28XBTLVZnatjtNyYZbTBPkFJ2qgJWx/j4h+yyt1/+EsajzT/GLoiO9umF Q/PcIZdDC4Xu84C5CcLMrDexYo8bLSchov2vE= Received: by 10.86.33.10 with SMTP id g10mr3831385fgg.14.1217345661109; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.100.10 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <59adc1a0807290834o22bc072ao95698f888d29488d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:34:21 +0300 From: "Dimitar Vasilev" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <59adc1a0807240802l7061ff26r3dbfe8048d3a62ce@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <59adc1a0807240122q7253bbeasff1f3a7b6c216561@mail.gmail.com> <488853C5.9000500@FreeBSD.org> <59adc1a0807240604m51c75a89n4ab7c426db1455fb@mail.gmail.com> <488886D8.4030400@FreeBSD.org> <59adc1a0807240802l7061ff26r3dbfe8048d3a62ce@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: nightrecon@verizon.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calcru went backwards on 7 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:34:23 -0000 Thanks in 2008/7/24 Dimitar Vasilev > > > 2008/7/24 Kris Kennaway : > > Dimitar Vasilev wrote: >> >>> The "calcru went backwards" message can have two causes: >>>> >>>> 1) Your time counter really went backwards and is too broken to use. >>>> >>>> 2) Something caused clock interrupts to be delayed for extremely long >>>> periods of time. This happens if you break to DDB for example. It can >>>> also >>>> happen if there are kernel bugs, maybe in a driver etc. Try to enable >>>> additional debugging (WITNESS, INVARIANTS, etc; see the developers >>>> handbook) >>>> and see where it gets you. >>>> >>>> Kris >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> Thanks Kris, >>> >>> Last time I tried to set the date there was a problem with the year - I >>> could not set the date beyond 2007 >>> >> >> That doesn't sound like a FreeBSD bug. >> > Hello, I did kgdb print_cpu ticks today. It says (kgdb) print cpu_ticks $1 = (cpu_tick_f *) 0xffffffff8077d340 This means that kernel is using tsc discipline actually imho. Could someone confirm this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 16:47:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB88E106567A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EC38FC08 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from [10.1.11.1] ([10.1.11.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6TGhDTn076675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:43:13 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:47:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(HkaQ*`!?YOK?Y!'M`C aP\9nVPF8Q}CilHH8l; ~!42HK6'3lg4J}az@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@k#0 54XDRg=Yn_F-etwot4U$bdTS{i X-Spam-Score: -4.375 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Subject: Building modules distributed with Apache, using ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:47:20 -0000 This may be a daft question. I freely admit it's a lazy one - I'm hoping someone has a quick answer that'll save me a couple of hours building a test server and experimenting. I built apache 2.0 from ports, using WITH_LDAP - but not WITH_LDAP_MODULES, as the Makefile.doc says it's implied by WITH_LDAP. As far as I can tell it's actually the other way round, that WITH_LDAP_MODULES triggers the WITH_LDAP options (either that or I didn't set it properly). Be that as it may, I now have an installation of Apache to which I need to add mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap from the Apache 2.0 distribution. Is it possible to use the www/apache20 port to build these, or additional modules generally, without rebuilding/reinstalling Apache itself? Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 17:54:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61758106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331688FC12 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so6180661rvf.43 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:54:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=meQG8x4sOcTT59w+enXY+IkotbLInsYTdHsxdAYEq4A=; b=Oq5ZwFLaEtxDlqc7MGp7A+0pI/jOcdBFS2x0yubhYKCM7d/c2MwHnHqAceQqE6i2qU KYD4qzqx9TbbLNrO0mxZpvRfa/MSIKjUFTqlZRpjn88y3NBGNdczJi6oRq2oClqyXW68 QY5Yr3zPuV1HSipM2rIvoX+m9biDvlLXA9qys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZaJOQApBkmUExsGUJjxL2KbLwMyPId3vC5T9dijl02mbtK1HplkVyFxsSGcLBa2B6Z W7xktC88a6fvym57PCYQE6TFdF1G/jR30K4LEwsFcrAShPXoeZAxyXt2erNUxv9d1oiC p4brbQKn8tQgCmrjxNarCd2NSl6dlgzhOHJ6c= Received: by 10.140.170.12 with SMTP id s12mr3458325rve.101.1217354087245; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.158.19 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:54:47 -0300 From: Agus To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Update Single Port tree due MOVED.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:54:48 -0000 Hi guys, Yesterday while updating my ports...I don't use all-ports, i instead choose the ones i use from the ports-supfile, i realized that when i wanted to install portaudit and some other ports management utils, they weren't anymore on sysutils...i looked at MOVED and swa that they are now in ports-mgmt....But i dont have that dir...so i was wondering how can i update this changes on ports tree without using ports-all.... Is there a way to update de ports-supfile o r something to update and bring the entire ports-mgmt for instance to my ports colection? i assume using cvsup directly i can checkout..but i wanted to check it woith you first..and how can i do this... Thanks in advance, Agus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 17:57:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813BF106567B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754E8FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 16403 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2008 17:57:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp7.knology.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 17:57:28 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id A5A8228429; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:57:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:57:28 -0500 From: David Kelly To: "John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ]" Message-ID: <20080729175728.GA41238@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20080728200902.EE19B1065684@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:57:30 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:09:15AM +0300, John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ] wrote: [2224 lines deleted] If you want help, start by learning that quoting entire email digests is frowned upon. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:19:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B82106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F858FC14 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 8so18688078agc.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Ea+S9B6tOSEq8FU9As+V/kpt5DEzNj+4jNclvp3xDfY=; b=uHmkBdPRnbhF63+95uMzT9DB0IEVOwJ+Bc5uhPuEqudwn2U0GCvnDU/nTibhJfYG2O W4O9FcA3DHRfrpcijS+y8IG0nAV7DM+0tJP9gBGnh+beiH9xIFpRm8zrlK2sytU1Mgi6 Mbwop53ZxKgwTujbT8ujK0/BvusWOvevIrYfg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Q1rmOtm6tojgj5hv+2hnK4EppM41BGd8d0s3pyzcUgN194Yyy52z28Ol1UiFL72FbO RgsTIwmUdsB4kqrDsc282jHtGW+GMc35i+Ku2Wj72HrA2+xqp5slRoW4QVvAoKjTCGBL 0JEaE35xDq4akWQkPLVxZlFHuPy32Ap3unfEc= Received: by 10.100.191.19 with SMTP id o19mr2882808anf.64.1217355593361; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807291119m11176a5dm980bc5652d71eea7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:19:53 +0000 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: "Odhiambo Washington" In-Reply-To: <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: alydiomc@yahoo.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:19:54 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I can tell you it is "impossible". Why? > While you can actually write a script to try to do it, you'll more > likely end up breaking the e-mail format, because it will not be too > easy to rightly guess the content-type/boundaries in replies. > Well, take a look at procmail, with a client like mutt... you can do > fancy things, but not the type you want! You won't know if it's impossible until you try it and fail repeatedly and grow some gray hairs from the experience. :-) But back to topic, I can see something like this being scriptable. It might wind up being one of those scripts that only works on one mail client which has been configured to display email in a particular way -- but seems like it could be done. -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:21:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E971065672 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCBC8FC1A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from cpsmtp-eml110.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.110]) by hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:21:41 +0200 Received: from KGISH ([84.83.61.253]) by cpsmtp-eml110.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:21:41 +0200 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:21:42 +0200 Message-ID: <001301c8f1a7$f3c38a50$6601a8c0@KGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6838 Thread-Index: Acjxp/NeQwjaW62zQGmZO9xNzFL/nw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2008 18:21:41.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2B7BFA0:01C8F1A7] Subject: Could not find bsd.port.options.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:21:44 -0000 When I run portupgrade I get the following make error: "Makefile", line 55: Could not find bsd.port.options.mk However, this file is located at: /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk What's going wrong? -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:22:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776B1106567F for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286D48FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 8so18688784agc.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=t5feh4OGyKLZYr7MEXEOR4Q0H7WPAYo+gDriY8ovExs=; b=fyHFout+PMKOLP7sKWDx77PEx04ERUJ/egdcXkPWA3PU5a/j3Ez7m3OA/c8ZAcWH77 koXxEkm8zspqmIcWFv6sk3iQL67T1DIT7I0qGqWg34DjnqcqD08Wl0/uqr7laW9MEuru wr56ALeAEaqzXXCdXUS18ToRb4DdS2q0sbMzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=AQRPjnMKEaCscxG5voeuRkm5xsrkCa0oZI3TqO7e7FyhVD0jvu7r3ivorex1vPI7Hs YFTRDlF7Qu/K4rheM5v6uHB8QdqEM5AeNO5NKnDZHejQvydAjGZQSgiEQQx3Iv9BLiOI qnFdnSz+IRoZgemLs9aVTHvDSdQ/hC3ok/WBY= Received: by 10.100.110.16 with SMTP id i16mr10882161anc.40.1217355738193; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807291122hd2fff79ta04b5984a877d36e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:22:18 +0000 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: alydiomc@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:22:19 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:07 AM, lyd mc wrote: > What I mean is adding a disclaimer/boilerplate for any outgoing message > just like mimedefang feature. However, I don't want it to be redundant. For > example if a mail already contains my disclaimer (usually mail from a reply > message), it should be relocated next to the new message not at the bottom > of the reply message. > > new message body > new message body > > Disclaimer <---- new location of disclaimer > > ---------------old messages ---------------------- > > old message > old message > > Disclaimer <--- to be relocated > > Ahh.. now i understand better. If I may ask, why do you want to do this? What is driving this request? Perhaps there might be a different approach to solving what you are trying to accomplish. -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:25:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA43A1065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-118.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-118.bluehost.com [69.89.22.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9717A8FC14 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 5151 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2008 18:25:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 18:25:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=ADDMuOVbMVnmuIo71nB6axbTYELyl335mfpnN8JGcMzJ4G+afSQa16sDfN4jrVS5VSEn31aY6YPdvVolRyJ18IyeGPczWfaSIfR9XoOypKBTTR6P5ZFtmPJEaleD4gkt; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KNtsg-00038c-GL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:25:06 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:19:04 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:19:04 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20080729181904.GA35291@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: formatting the time in tcsh prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:25:09 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This might be slightly off-topic, I suppose -- but since (t)csh is the default shell for FreeBSD, I figured this might be a good place to ask. I'm aware of the %T option for showing 24-hour time in my tcsh prompt, but it doesn't do exactly what I would like. Inserting a call to the date command so I can have the exact formatting I want appears to fail by only calculating the time once, and showing the same time every time the prompt appears -- which means that, several hours later, I'm still looking at the time from when the shell instance was started. The prompt setting using the date command that I used is as follows: set prompt =3D "[`date +'%H%M'`] %~%# " At nine in the morning, that gives me: [0900] ~> =2E . . whereas the tcsh native time formatting for 24-hour time is: set prompt =3D "[%T] %~%# " At nine in the morning, that gives me: [9:00] ~> I would prefer to not have the colon in there, but it's not a big deal. The biggest annoyance is the fact that the length of the time string changes depending on whether it's an AM time or a PM time. This is the best I've been able to get so far for a timestamp in the prompt that updates every time the prompt is displayed: [9:00] ~> This is acceptable: [09:00] ~> This is most preferred: [0900] ~> There must be some way to do this. Right? --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Jon Postel, RFC 761: "[B]e conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others." --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiPXxgACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW8CQCguXwLZ8+ndGpZcF0xpFCFytJ1 QRIAoIueP+4IhNtMdUakufqb2IppFG3m =pjzF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:37:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E421065673 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7208FC08 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so255ywe.13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:37:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=7HxDhmv+4mMnE1KkV7K8/99FcysUiQBXlB/ms5U0hxs=; b=EDmQA9knD3xPVJFXOPklxMQy0rLOJ3QPHn8fqYBmB+AWMK5qs5/O+EKTaGMDcons4m SDKPbGuFI8OH4iAMerg9SZs9mjaW1CnUby87dENph8Dadl1FFxizcjqSi8M0NroKkmzI jhV+sO5QPkqih8LjwSYgLwpBsrX2w9BQkATi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lm9AcET/zzvsv6uWad7ZRzUnItXlhwQWrdvu5tEE+8UltnkeswZhmlxhxiM1If64xY suZlFJ4tJPFOHo3VYLxI54slKamnHp86CyPBC5pXVON5lhwYmSpprSqwmVCAnPJa6mBF 1mW3zYCFarblPoNeHF7PSbvqsTf14Dk5E7Hok= Received: by 10.141.107.13 with SMTP id j13mr3464822rvm.276.1217355022669; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:10:22 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:37:04 -0000 Hi List, Is tmpfs stable on FreeBSD 6.3 ? I want to use it for temporary clamav+ripmime files to speedup a mail filter server. Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:46:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A141065672 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F128FC12; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:46:19 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Biancalana References: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:22 -0000 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > Hi List, > > Is tmpfs stable on FreeBSD 6.3 ? I want to use it for temporary > clamav+ripmime files to speedup a mail filter server. It's not stable on 7.0 or 8.0 either, so no :) Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:47:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268521065673 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@kocherfamily.org) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB858FC14 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@kocherfamily.org) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so4112fkk.11 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.90.8 with SMTP id s8mr378732mkl.73.1217357247740; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.122.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e3f5d680807291147i3a96c687ufa445756cc8b750a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:27 -0500 From: "Troy Kocher" To: "Vincent Hoffman" In-Reply-To: <488F1E72.2010805@unsane.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1e3f5d680807290516j25953436ic46ca9be50ca1841@mail.gmail.com> <488F1E72.2010805@unsane.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loader.conf issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:47:30 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > Troy Kocher wrote: >> >> Listers, >> >> For some reason my kernel setting aren't being recognized. . >> >> tao# more loader.conf >> geom_vinum_load="YES" >> kern.ipc.semmni=256 >> kern.ipc.semmns=512 >> kern.ipc.semmnu=256 >> kern.ipc.semmap=256 >> kern.ipc.shmall=32768 >> kern.ipc.shmmax=100000000 >> >> On reboot shmall & shmmax have to be set manually. >> >> What did I do wrong? >> >> > > Try adding them to /etc/sysctl.conf instead? > >> Thanks >> >> Troy >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Thanks I'll give that a try. . Troy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:55:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AC81065673 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD7A8FC18 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so4662597fgb.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u8/VmfZDipdUIsuC7/L2ydoia1xZGGdgO9MplgdWSrw=; b=CdHTFq9hGOXvDo7r+GOJIWoDCpSCqBWXRi79GPufDp7CPCKLPldo/6WAGKVk70nVmV AFZ193eAwsbBNAU2LOfrVvgBrJJMsqT+Kx8MaB/BYr6tRlufJTFMJ4MR1WVCZZMaVILu IYsxRgAdUuAjaMyWqxdZqbbbHt+wtogmOV5zc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=clLzHk/RFdP8plcTwcy+IXDIIguYRvk6kf0WbeQikSDz2N3Oh6Yw3gCYH//9NJP6L9 Gkh2fE8SrgtfbEU0gRtSeIyd4J5XqbcFduYtvf46rPjbnC1EsrDAc/LVJxMmpVTgopg/ ShvcRD5jdACE6BiNZyTqObx3u052G0dGJ7qcQ= Received: by 10.86.26.1 with SMTP id 1mr3973871fgz.35.1217357731463; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [79.130.48.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm17545427fga.1.2008.07.29.11.55.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <488F6792.8010606@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:55:14 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Agus References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Update Single Port tree due MOVED.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:33 -0000 Agus wrote: > Hi guys, > > Yesterday while updating my ports...I don't use all-ports, i instead choose > the ones i use from the ports-supfile, i realized that when i wanted to > install portaudit and some other ports management utils, they weren't > anymore on sysutils...i looked at MOVED and swa that they are now in > ports-mgmt....But i dont have that dir...so i was wondering how can i update > this changes on ports tree without using ports-all.... > Simple, you could add ports-mgmt to your ports-supfile > Is there a way to update de ports-supfile o r something to update and bring > the entire ports-mgmt for instance to my ports colection? > i assume using cvsup directly i can checkout..but i wanted to check it woith > you first..and how can i do this... > > Thanks in advance, > Agus > > Another good advice for everyone not wanting to get the entire ports tree, is to use refuse files. Instead of enabling specific parts of the ports tree in the supfile, a refuse file will allow you to just deny getting specific ports. For example, say you don't want to get any of the language specific ports (arabic, french, japanese...), you put those in the refuse file. See an example in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/refuse and read about its use in man csup From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 18:55:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E5F106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prestonh@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF65B8FC27 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prestonh@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so6056pyb.10 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=y4giWwOPCy72X7/6unJcHgR3noR/fATDp4jP9sFWkrk=; b=SDGHKBj2dCQmonqssaIDmkXFsP/FyWzbL1fb2LLzj9m5q3qlp8ZoXiVIWPeQQPkdOd In4T2TN5t8Ru4kHy8LGH7G23iWdUPj+E4xIgLQrBwdeR7AJJC6pfGLOKOfXZ3m9QG5pM VTCviaPwecFL27ZY3gLswgEmSd6NwruU50Ers= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FX8XAq459kQqH9E8nPTBlNklDU8YvFoTCX6C8UfJglbIw3FDZPQpGIRseRr7628EUn 7yFUeE0RG7AGb/Vbee2TDYNedKSNlx+zQD5EuW5wqHjMJUScJ3kDBURyOMrClujdBaBc WZ6NY514iBUM4XJkxxxNSIlUTkeMN28AMrXFE= Received: by 10.141.1.2 with SMTP id d2mr3504876rvi.129.1217356057614; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.186.5 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f5897560807291127p44ad6222hbe2ada7b4ceaab0f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:27:37 -0500 From: "Preston Hagar" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:55:44 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I really like the Dell, both because of their outstanding contrast and > brightness, no dead pixels in any of my LCDs, and the fact that they come with > multiple interfaces which are switch selectable from the front panel. The old > 20" units had 4 jacks (RCA, S-Video, VGA, and DVI). Really convenient. The new > 24" one, beyond being able to run native 1920X1080 for HiDef Video, it's got > about 10 different jacks. Looks it up the web, the Dell pages describe it best, > and the contrast on that 24" has to be seen to be believed. I actually turned > it down! I would second the Dell's, specifically the UltraSharp line. I have a 19" Ultrasharp as my primary monitor and a 19" Dell "Standard" as a secondary monitor. The Ultrasharp has DVI and VGA, a built in USB hub and is great to look at. Preston From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 19:00:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FA5106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929F38FC1B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 68-189-244-97.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.244.97] helo=Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KNuR9-00036i-Qy; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:00:45 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001AD22A5BD2; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:00:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <488F68E2.2090409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:00:50 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions , perrin@apotheon.com References: <20080729181904.GA35291@kokopelli.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20080729181904.GA35291@kokopelli.hydra> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) Cc: Subject: Re: formatting the time in tcsh prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:00:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chad Perrin wrote: | This might be slightly off-topic, I suppose -- but since (t)csh is the | default shell for FreeBSD, I figured this might be a good place to ask. | | I'm aware of the %T option for showing 24-hour time in my tcsh prompt, | but it doesn't do exactly what I would like. Inserting a call to the | date command so I can have the exact formatting I want appears to fail by | only calculating the time once, and showing the same time every time the | prompt appears -- which means that, several hours later, I'm still | looking at the time from when the shell instance was started. | | The prompt setting using the date command that I used is as follows: | | set prompt = "[`date +'%H%M'`] %~%# " | ... | There must be some way to do this. Right? | Hi Chad, Right! Try this: set prompt=' % ' alias precmd 'printf "[%s]" "`date +'%H%M'`"' Best regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.sourcehosting.net/ http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIj2ji0sRouByUApARAopEAJ4vVmUZEZ7N+EKPn8fcMAcQGCXlJwCcCrqo pk+1mKZ8Hn63DhZ3qlCWucQ= =hqQT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 19:10:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AEE106566C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE4A8FC17 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so9048ywe.13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=sjb5DKEWHrpmALzT9+Ml8tdQeH8Tyd3udWKvrhnICU0=; b=w1SOVNUqLYvsiQ8pM1JxdeLJ2hwS4IlgVQ+UO/W2m89hIOlJlJhTaiilQWKMEmaE3a 1hszZ7I7ydqTj5ifUF326zh+tGkkyMBs+wBXBLrXrHOVyX0buk2MNmICGgSm6ALpKfZ4 LGQoto/h2KpsZhRUwhdIoEaWbfaIiuiZb1piI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=p8zzajm0lkzecvueTtvn+ARaAcgHwaDY9nkq+LtZA/KdlWjkPpByIJjhmiSuSNEAYD zHKm7CouSubt3cKk2pq6bXT2vF1+064YO5PknLjjqOlTlIeB+4KJrBXLGKRsQf5tJvgv JLryCuLziv1AxO4GyALo7kMGndZhvadAEPeX4= Received: by 10.140.139.3 with SMTP id m3mr2192468rvd.44.1217358612279; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.153.18 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <991123400807291210q4f39ff24va21e22585e86b7cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:10:12 +0300 From: "Odhiambo Washington" To: "darko gavrilovic" In-Reply-To: <82f3feb90807291119m11176a5dm980bc5652d71eea7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> <82f3feb90807291119m11176a5dm980bc5652d71eea7@mail.gmail.com> Cc: alydiomc@yahoo.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:10:14 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:19 PM, darko gavrilovic wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: >> >> I can tell you it is "impossible". Why? >> While you can actually write a script to try to do it, you'll more >> likely end up breaking the e-mail format, because it will not be too >> easy to rightly guess the content-type/boundaries in replies. >> Well, take a look at procmail, with a client like mutt... you can do >> fancy things, but not the type you want! > > You won't know if it's impossible until you try it and fail repeatedly and > grow some gray hairs from the experience. :-) Not growing grey hair, but losing all that you have, even! > But back to topic, I can see something like this being scriptable. It might > wind up being one of those scripts that only works on one mail client which > has been configured to display email in a particular way -- but seems like > it could be done. If it was, it could have been done already.right now? There are reasons why this cannot be done easily: 1. E-mail disclaimers are considered stupid 2. It's not easy to mangle all types the same of mail as composition (mime type boundaries/content disposition) is always different. Hey, but who says you cannot do it? Let's see what you come up with :-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!" --from a /. post From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 19:22:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920A9106566B; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A878A8FC2B; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6TJLtAh053395; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:21:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6TJLsF2053392; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:21:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:21:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20080729212135.G53385@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Alexandre Biancalana Subject: Re: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:22:05 -0000 >> Is tmpfs stable on FreeBSD 6.3 ? I want to use it for temporary >> clamav+ripmime files to speedup a mail filter server. > > It's not stable on 7.0 or 8.0 either, so no :) still no crash on my systems :) anyway - it's not available in 6.3 AFAIK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 19:45:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1038106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E67E8FC0A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2008 19:19:14 -0000 Received: from d056231.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO [80.171.56.231]) [80.171.56.231] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 21:19:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18HDiBwORQHmpbbH9NxGsgEPULDmkBq+qfSvuh5n8 iLh1WVd6PmdD8a Message-ID: <488F6D36.1060603@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:19:18 +0200 From: Lokadamus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Lenthe References: <488BE9F2.1070409@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <488BE9F2.1070409@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA300 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:57 -0000 Jason Lenthe wrote: > My machine, a home-brew running 7.0-RELEASE-p2, has 3 SATA hard drives > all of which were advertised as SATA300 drives, but: > > vader# dmesg | grep ATA > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > atapci1: port > 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af > irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > ata2: on atapci1 > ata3: on atapci1 > ad4: 305245MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad5: 476940MB at ata2-slave SATA150 > ad6: 305245MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > Does this mean I'm only getting half the throughput I could be getting? > > Thanks, > Jason > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You can test speed of your harddisk with diskinfo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 20:18:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9912A1065672 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF2D8FC2C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so68251ana.13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:18:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=vtKmOPrPkigRO1fMRnqdFtPL8jChiO7Z2XDksdfgn6Y=; b=YhRDph7rCajotf8IdWPi/uYjHLKT2h6+UlAjiJ5h2YnrAueUVwTarGQ3TN29dIFQHt RDlylX0kr6mzpIRhZpD94sHYAdEbBVFajJtAGYOoWsfxOIiRdy7eXjBGOE1jax7j6nun HOXIqjNgZQMARgZMlZhPU24ceuZxWPUNMFHrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=LRPS56BJpCuCAzzWC2oEpNr0X2XonwtsycZqQy94uGEFuM4JNP4YxIiwlgHkrjixiA GcXzQwfiG8E/Fm5T/zf7+smTgPPVUTw2JmwmXBEvSSmCmLdX55woJO+1PNT0xrMtij/V To3b1MSFpNkrA9hQ2W7pomZbzguGCppkQa24c= Received: by 10.100.105.15 with SMTP id d15mr1556515anc.92.1217362711541; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807291318h707fc6a6i18f0f4b5fd1a8882@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:18:31 +0000 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: "Odhiambo Washington" In-Reply-To: <991123400807291210q4f39ff24va21e22585e86b7cd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82f3feb90807282017k22053d4cof15798685d53cd69@mail.gmail.com> <765169.66920.qm@web52211.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <991123400807290413v1984f747wb3e8616c78764b@mail.gmail.com> <82f3feb90807291119m11176a5dm980bc5652d71eea7@mail.gmail.com> <991123400807291210q4f39ff24va21e22585e86b7cd@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: alydiomc@yahoo.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:18:32 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > 1. E-mail disclaimers are considered stupid They are considered stupid by some people on the Internet. But there are workplaces and businesses that require them in outgoing e-mail send by their staff. Does anyone read them or pay attention to those disclaimers? That's a topic for the chat list I guess. -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 20:23:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE049106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D048FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6TKO7Vf070935; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:24:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:23:54 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Preston Hagar Message-ID: <20080729202354.GA38403@thought.org> References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> <8f5897560807291127p44ad6222hbe2ada7b4ceaab0f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8f5897560807291127p44ad6222hbe2ada7b4ceaab0f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:24:00 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Preston Hagar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Chuck Robey wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > I really like the Dell, both because of their outstanding contrast and > > brightness, no dead pixels in any of my LCDs, and the fact that they come with > > multiple interfaces which are switch selectable from the front panel. The old > > 20" units had 4 jacks (RCA, S-Video, VGA, and DVI). Really convenient. The new > > 24" one, beyond being able to run native 1920X1080 for HiDef Video, it's got > > about 10 different jacks. Looks it up the web, the Dell pages describe it best, > > and the contrast on that 24" has to be seen to be believed. I actually turned > > it down! > > I would second the Dell's, specifically the UltraSharp line. I have a > 19" Ultrasharp as my primary monitor and a 19" Dell "Standard" as a > secondary monitor. The Ultrasharp has DVI and VGA, a built in USB hub > and is great to look at. Thanks, Preston. So:: boiling it down to a make and a line, now Chuck [[ and you ]] give thumbs-up on the Dell. "UltraSharp", rt? A personal note from the cheapes--er, *thriftiest* guy alive: for a new display, price isn' the driving force. it's quality-- which includes durabiility, function, &c. (actually, i wouldn't mind 19+.) 20" [[[ and when the hell are we going to join the 18th Century and go-metric?! ]]] ....20" is about the max since i cram as many xterms with tiny fonts as possible. so brightness+contrast matter. [[ if i could get out easily, i might check out the 24" ... but that would only give me LCD-envy!! --ah, *life* :-| ]] Anyhow, ao far, i'm looking at the Hanns-G, the Samsung SyncMaster (941BW), And possobily the VIewSonic. And the Dell UltraSharp. (gReat if Costco has these; but i'll try egghead.com too.) Anybody here in the States have any other recommmendation, plese gimmmee a shout:-) gary > > Preston > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 20:26:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CC7106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coertw2@gawab.com) Received: from ctb-mesg7.saix.net (ctb-mesg7.saix.net [196.25.240.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78128FC0C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coertw2@gawab.com) Received: from [10.20.30.100] (dsl-244-56-144.telkomadsl.co.za [41.244.56.144]) by ctb-mesg7.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB08B2C1A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:24:59 +0200 (SAST) From: Coert Waagmeester To: FreeBSD-questions Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:24:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:26:13 -0000 Hi all! I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and expensive. How many data would it be in total? Thanks in advance, Coert FreeBSD newbie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 20:47:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF6E106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4A28FC17 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so78538rvf.43 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Cx+gsa8ZJhqSGUjPUjBLO5ZAc312vSLwG4JVw24YYdU=; b=pkA1r3M+Ywcs6981QtfTJF1AOPy/67ZgoBhLLrS9nOZX6dhnAbHVJsdyNzSD/iiVbM TAO5e7N1batLDAi2kWP6c+bKKisEB5iH7fjCGwcx34UWo9wFEc+Dbb1MU1gB6SxPiPkB fkfXY03IbUtrvFtEf6dDe4V75eJLwRo9f/whw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=s8ndnGK8YexsF17ina2jO/Bl27NwbvWPg6eY2auVWmiArQxz60u6Kb8una2D4y8y5t 9mMAvpPOXcPGUAQGGu6atAg0pZNSgID3QHQ/YrJoukFhzS8rTXGa2sw49K4+yeHq+sf6 3FH7ELlfszUsGvZuYDmmsU07QEG6lYxs/WgQM= Received: by 10.140.147.5 with SMTP id u5mr3681387rvd.274.1217364451843; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.248.15 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54db43990807291347q3960b0d3xdd0b6da606e82f0a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:47:31 -0400 From: "Bob Johnson" To: "Coert Waagmeester" In-Reply-To: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:47:32 -0000 On 7/29/08, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hi all! > > > > I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. > > What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and > packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and > expensive. > > How many data would it be in total? Does fetching from an existing mirror in South Africa help, e.g. cvsup.za.freebsd.org or ftp.za.freebsd.org? -- Bob Johnson fbsdlists@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 21:04:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168CF106567C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5438FC1C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn04@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so8719wxd.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GiUZc+0Kk5lqzqJTmU0qH5oB9e3lUOE0USoBHl4ksLA=; b=Zl+iMqVvfNE9/Ui/EFK4j+4tsSFygBeNYaNPc9M+xwRqoOqeC30E2V7e0xQWdZcMf2 4vCy1JOQbTv/UWL/VtGlQ0TgJzbHIrgE0m9aBOmh/DCAbTFo+m1ocV5Gi67BfCdTCGDR LJ6DwwJJ74W4lPdwUGCZDG+g7pOJ7ahPT88TY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=C6iun8kS6OH6YxHrL51MvYLofTHSIuA2Hb9C/8Lz4iR4lqYwIzWkG0yzBOA5xQfosi vO7m6A8Nl6T02EojOsXjYynb/BTWTOFDPhqjLxowEZAJaXwC3xTAl6UPSNp8+niTUKzL wbYwCBC7GzhYZWNoQoMEBQ4rgfNIrqbtvR0Ps= Received: by 10.70.43.16 with SMTP id q16mr8826934wxq.82.1217363918977; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.32.1 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4d7dd86f0807291338k3a4e5b2fpacaa08edac4f86ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:38:38 +1000 From: "David N" To: "Gary Kline" In-Reply-To: <20080729202354.GA38403@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> <8f5897560807291127p44ad6222hbe2ada7b4ceaab0f@mail.gmail.com> <20080729202354.GA38403@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:51 -0000 2008/7/30 Gary Kline : > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Preston Hagar wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> >> > I really like the Dell, both because of their outstanding contrast and >> > brightness, no dead pixels in any of my LCDs, and the fact that they come with >> > multiple interfaces which are switch selectable from the front panel. The old >> > 20" units had 4 jacks (RCA, S-Video, VGA, and DVI). Really convenient. The new >> > 24" one, beyond being able to run native 1920X1080 for HiDef Video, it's got >> > about 10 different jacks. Looks it up the web, the Dell pages describe it best, >> > and the contrast on that 24" has to be seen to be believed. I actually turned >> > it down! >> >> I would second the Dell's, specifically the UltraSharp line. I have a >> 19" Ultrasharp as my primary monitor and a 19" Dell "Standard" as a >> secondary monitor. The Ultrasharp has DVI and VGA, a built in USB hub >> and is great to look at. > > > Thanks, Preston. > > So:: boiling it down to a make and a line, now Chuck [[ and you ]] > give thumbs-up on the Dell. "UltraSharp", rt? > > A personal note from the cheapes--er, *thriftiest* guy alive: > for a new display, price isn' the driving force. it's quality-- > which includes durabiility, function, &c. (actually, i wouldn't > mind 19+.) 20" [[[ and when the hell are we going to join the 18th > Century and go-metric?! ]]] ....20" is about the max since i cram > as many xterms with tiny fonts as possible. so > brightness+contrast matter. [[ if i could get out easily, i > might check out the 24" ... but that would only give me LCD-envy!! > --ah, *life* :-| ]] > > > Anyhow, ao far, i'm looking at the Hanns-G, the Samsung SyncMaster > (941BW), And possobily the VIewSonic. And the Dell UltraSharp. > > (gReat if Costco has these; but i'll try egghead.com too.) > > Anybody here in the States have any other recommmendation, > plese gimmmee a shout:-) > > gary > > >> >> Preston >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi I'm a computer parts reseller in Australia (If that actually counts for anything). We personally prefer Samsung (3 years on site warranty) for most of our displays here in the office and to customers. And please please check the warranty terms, some will say 3 years onsite, and in fine print, pick up and return, so you'll be out of a monitor whilst its being repaired. Cheers David N From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 22:21:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9E1106566C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coertw2@gawab.com) Received: from ctb-mesg7.saix.net (ctb-mesg7.saix.net [196.25.240.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F988FC0A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coertw2@gawab.com) Received: from [10.20.30.100] (dsl-244-56-144.telkomadsl.co.za [41.244.56.144]) by ctb-mesg7.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D1B2B98; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:21:03 +0200 (SAST) From: Coert Waagmeester To: Bob Johnson In-Reply-To: <54db43990807291347q3960b0d3xdd0b6da606e82f0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <54db43990807291347q3960b0d3xdd0b6da606e82f0a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:20:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1217370054.26937.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:21:09 -0000 On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 16:47 -0400, Bob Johnson wrote: > On 7/29/08, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. > > > > What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and > > packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and > > expensive. > > > > How many data would it be in total? > > Does fetching from an existing mirror in South Africa help, e.g. > cvsup.za.freebsd.org or ftp.za.freebsd.org? > > > -- Bob Johnson > fbsdlists@gmail.com Yes, I am currently rsyncing: ftp://ftp.is.co.za/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/ Is this the correct data? And where in FreeBSD do I change the mirror list or installation source? Thank you in advance, Coert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 22:23:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485EB1065671 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF9E8FC13; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488F984A.6070704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:23:06 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Coert Waagmeester References: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1217359489.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:23:06 -0000 Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hi all! > > > > I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. > > What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and > packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and > expensive. > > How many data would it be in total? Consider that if bandwidth is expensive then you probably don't want to download data you are not going to use. The ports tree is only a few hundred MB uncompressed (about 50MB or so compressed), and cvsup or portsnap updates are small (you only download the changes). That is presumably the best option. If you want to mirror the full ports CVS repository it is a few GB. If you want to mirror packages, then you're looking at tens of gigabytes that are updated every few days. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 23:57:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A7C106564A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE168FC17 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so31718qwb.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:57:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=yXu3WmjhfgAJvyMuYWVfAI5dkYFZthXb0QEvyLuDp1w=; b=bg59pD1EhP0xsdIpFZhEbgIDBV06H+TDhE04orVWEwYkTi87yQqoNTTvSMfs7BLxcW FEu1OK/l9pZdHUXqtuBjelKDGmpJkNwigdQ1j8rW0sgfRKZjmmfzT139ihAjHAAPO+eG pCd7dGZvJ5MJEi0iuPa+EZUPd3H8Y3g2uoloU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=BSTllSW+wbyafIrlNSzbX889/WVTKIRaLlEU3lI+T3VYRpJVSDNjZRYjqBQ2HqTk6e OCmuzcDcYD8eBZzHAWcwen19w3/OeJuR1VmBGvmariIBZYi90/9/9gENp8Oak3AE1usY +nmreuXmTMuNE2fjnhyhtav8FAxVOXqfMLec0= Received: by 10.215.14.10 with SMTP id r10mr3375610qai.48.1217374346403; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.220.14 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b30fd140807291632v491323d4jb4371ec1303bd5a9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:32:26 +0100 From: "David Collins" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pxeboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:57:27 -0000 Hi, I am not sure if this is the correct list to post this to, and if it isn't please could you point me to where it should go. I have recently turned to freeBSD and so far I love it. I have a small laptop that I use for playing around and general fiddling. I was using the Debian netinstall and booting over pxe/tftp when I wanted to reinstall. I started looking at the automated install, but it seemed very complex. I have been looking at the freeBSD option and it seems that the automated intall is very simple (at least from a user point of view). I have been trying to get pxeboot to work, so far with no luck. I have a dhcp/tftp server set up and I am able to push pxeboot across the network, so I assume that is all ok. NFS is also setup, at least I was getting nfs errors that I don't have anymore. I copied the contents of the 7.0 cd into the my tftpboot folder and changed the contents for loader.conf and loader.rc according to here http://www.locolomo.org/pub/pxeboot/pxeboot.html and http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml and so far I am able to get a prompt come up but I am unable to get any further. As soon as I enter anything the computer immediately reboots so i am unable to see any error messages. I assume the paths are relative to the tftp server. Can anyone give me quick example to get me off to a start. Thanks David Collins Here are my config files, I think that is all of them # cat /etc/exports /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0 -alldirs -ro -maproot=root # cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; ddns-update-style none; subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.2.8 192.168.2.15; #filename "/pxelinux.0"; filename "/freeBSD7.0/boot/pxeboot"; next-server 192.168.2.4; option routers 192.168.2.4; option root-path "/usr2/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0"; } # grep tftp /etc/inetd.conf tftp dgram udp wait root /usr/libexec/tftpd tftpd -l -s /usr/tftpboot #cat /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0/boot/loader.rc echo Loading Kernel... set choice=freebsd-ide read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice include /boot/loader.rc-$choice read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice load /boot/kernel/kernel load linux.ko echo \007\007 set vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/md0c" #cat /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0/boot/loader.conf init_path="/stand/sysinstall" rootfs_load="YES" rootfs_name="/boot/mfsroot" rootfs_type="mfs_root" vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/md0c" autoboot_delay=5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 00:36:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C1C106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YK=aa2a7b04@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8678FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YK=aa2a7b04@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A4D163F84 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F00023E409 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:20:35 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080730012035.66564794@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080727101216.GA42938@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <3267.84.18.27.248.1217152064.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> <20080727101216.GA42938@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Root boot/mount Password? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:36:48 -0000 On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:12:16 +0200 Roland Smith wrote: > Note that encrypting the partitions where the OS lives is not > particularly usefull; there is nothing secret there. On the contrary, > it would potentially make the encrypted partition vulnerable to a > known plaintext attack. The reason for doing it is to protect the OS from modification. For that to be effective the /boot really needs to be on removable media. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 00:46:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED12106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE358FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so210471rvf.43 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=W/kLfR2wnJe8CMG+ecESNXa1M2CEStlIv+sipJ3EvhQ=; b=KnoVRcUiby1QraVrDd9Mi3XYyh604qhkyR72yERS1uI3o9n8lbYOMZRP5no3d+e1kV VkmyiwQ1aGFXNnWtM2FjYeCD09L5/5sBAqV91Zx2nHf4a+Xb8w412jXa05D00YNPdtnO khS61FbbaDNJlifpkm0QuW9gIk7aEPerf49IQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Suf7F6Vlx4iZUymHK6xGBnJ+Ne1aQmaCzQ06L8XoeOKuqfhHGrzsDhvcyx+Kh3rCSu rVBkF8RStGYaa6MiZb7FEZiOUjupH3Byx39YCBpasHXnKWdjy0pJWj+l2L1x/hCkIFSg 203KIUXyDfWSZURKnaojTgmA8mYKxtJWXg/+s= Received: by 10.141.13.16 with SMTP id q16mr3816938rvi.99.1217378798107; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0807291746o50b4c63fk41d5e518f694dbb8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:46:38 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:46:45 -0000 On 7/29/08, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > > Hi List, > > > > Is tmpfs stable on FreeBSD 6.3 ? I want to use it for temporary > > clamav+ripmime files to speedup a mail filter server. > > > > It's not stable on 7.0 or 8.0 either, so no :) Any viable alternative ? mdconfig -t malloc maybe ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:12:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC9C106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wyattnealster@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0327E8FC16 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wyattnealster@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so46662qwb.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=RAk2FtGHogxwfZGh5x/xsdPakT8R7TV4zdx//f1oUds=; b=Tx5hMWhi8IxeIm7P3s6fiYMxBrhTW/qYXW8a/wZirysnAQPcuAFECJE+FZL9kIcOvr e+Rq0Cu5K/bNhfDTltZ1X67y64q/hpZFiaW8kTf3a/xto1a9LKJI3JwDfpEmmIZ9V6D9 MJT3k7cpzX+Eoi2LAh/nxuWrBDOGpJGzpga4Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=b+D5NZn6OsMLPK9uE6YPZvOkd0a9EHMWf5GlwOHPP993tJHQyiIkTRDsO7+gljku/L Q/f8T+5hc6TEsVKyBPFIXul8WUENPEtBcHwpZMQthk/BT50pzjtgCGM70tKpWB+V43YU 3Go9EYIG/tY6FL3k9a5fao3hNLzaS4xKDK+HQ= Received: by 10.214.182.3 with SMTP id e3mr3516811qaf.93.1217378862188; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.226.6 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:47:42 -0400 From: "Wyatt Neal" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: difficulty building a cross-compiler with a fresh install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:52 -0000 greetings, i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the system. the first issue that shows is: In file included from archive.c:132: sysdep.h:173:21: libintl.h: No such file or directory this comes from the libintl.h being located in /usr/local/include instead of /usr/include. a simple modification to the CFLAGS as so: export CFLAGS="-I /usr/local/include" has resolved binutils building correctly. a build of gcc shows the same issue; however, gcc fails to build with the following error: gcc -c -I /usr/local/include -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./. -I./../include \ ./config/i386/i386.c -o i386.o ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: `ix86_svr3_asm_out_constructor' undeclared here (not in a function) ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.asm_out.constructor') ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.asm_out') ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.sched') ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.calls') ./config/i386/i386.c: In function `ix86_file_end': ./config/i386/i386.c:4839: warning: implicit declaration of function `ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME' gmake[1]: *** [i386.o] Error 1 both binutils and gcc are being built from the source from ftp.gnu.org following along with http://docs.freebsd.org/info/gcc/gcc.info.Cross-Compiler.html i've not encountered this error before on the various linux systems so i'm assuming it's something that i'm doing with being new to freebsd. i've been able to compile the above code on my ubuntu system without issue as well so i'm fairly certain it's something i'm screwing up on freebsd. bintuils 2.18 config string: ./configure --target=i386v --program-prefix=i386v- --prefix=/usr/local gcc 3.4.4 config string: ./configure --target=i386v --program-prefix=i386v- --prefix=/usr/local --program-suffix="" thoughts? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:16:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2841065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF098FC1D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U1Gm36072496 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:16:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:16:35 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:16:37 -0000 i'm on newegg.com that has a whole slew of options for narrowing the field. q's: is a higher contrast ratio better than a lower ratio? is the widescreen better than the std? --i think widescreen is 16x9, standard is 4x3. i'm thinking of sticking w ith 19";is there any reason i should go >= 20"? thanks, gary ps: so far, samsung look s good, v'sonic next.... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:42:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD251065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142FC8FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e34so47657qbe.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:42:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=EaEK8zOxAzqJKbbL8hXfrrMp+FfGFubp5V23wXzQ2t8=; b=Fv/D+HE6LYgbkGG2FZukjU1UPoCp7HmBnLZgEXSAkrn35qFURY7fAga1iHgeOfN6WQ QEO/g6cWfm5i2vKUvZf/mqx0VqLrsIbOoM3ERcV93ArBbdaiPqIS0OnKcWz6OnFj6sPM Y+4Pc6XG3oP3SxgMecbLpohA/kO2PUtdZOEP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Ug80mDCFAj80paelOvP8gAOcyI+5fNM7FECYaZpM4byBPRzgvfczVAbowYYKVdVypy KoqTDso9dpQRWiiTnCRxNyVeEpgKlpcQJZfuxqZ1Ps5QPFW8TeZkqzc/gFRqb905QfUB UfDAvzPkHDwRnEKPbtPzoECFtVU8LFLrk0Tqc= Received: by 10.141.211.13 with SMTP id n13mr3831441rvq.184.1217381210584; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.43.17 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:26:50 -0400 From: "Andy Christianson" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:42:20 -0000 Whenever I send any email from my normal user account, it goes straight to dead.letter, even if I attempt to mail a local user. When I try to send mail as root, it simply does not send. I have a very basic, updated FreeBSD 7.0 installation. Mail has not worked since I installed 7.0 about 42 days ago. I am able to ping internet addresses as well as well as resolve domain names. At the very least, can someone point me in the correct direction to start debugging this? I have read relevant sections in the FreeBSD handbook as well as sendmail manpages, etc. Thanks in advance for any help! -Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 01:46:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840B51065677 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4498FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U1kkbE072641 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:46:33 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:46:37 -0000 On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:16:35PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > i'm on newegg.com that has a whole slew of options for narrowing the > field. > > q's: is a higher contrast ratio better than a lower ratio? > is the widescreen better than the std? --i think widescreen is > 16x9, standard is 4x3. i'm thinking of sticking w ith 19";is > there any reason i should go >= 20"? > > thanks, > > gary > > ps: so far, samsung look s good, v'sonic next.... > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) -g -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:05:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3811065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCA18FC1F; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <488FCC66.6090707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:05:26 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Biancalana References: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> <8e10486b0807291746o50b4c63fk41d5e518f694dbb8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807291746o50b4c63fk41d5e518f694dbb8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:05:25 -0000 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > On 7/29/08, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Alexandre Biancalana wrote: >> >>> Hi List, >>> >>> Is tmpfs stable on FreeBSD 6.3 ? I want to use it for temporary >>> clamav+ripmime files to speedup a mail filter server. >>> >> It's not stable on 7.0 or 8.0 either, so no :) > > Any viable alternative? Of course :) > mdconfig -t malloc maybe ? -t swap is faster and has fewer downsides. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:09:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FD51065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:09:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3058FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:09:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so91625wah.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:09:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=A1q/lhpU76VUK4uBu5+ZbiPxrxlDV8Jzhz3sWtB6J8c=; b=eSAQymXtajeqOZ14j1w1BlioEatQOxtWpNsTk5aRA8+RUe6cq8UCj8gY2gSLR7gydA gF1oVqlM/N6Fevhb7xrJjD4RTPw0AsM2IMA0YQoUc8z2JLjKqmIqDgNjZWsnHtFu/egW uE8X+XvQFRphKe2rUUmNqIHz863UVUe+AlLIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Fp3YTnP5xhr/aQI/vMnkDeCeBrDUESt4q8hViPQ/254cGMh1Ah4MFksuGMqYNg9Jf0 ro93aMcLk73UQA1OfxvOMo/1wc6U+wZWoKs3MMFx9ejhwJUDR/L2TnpTmkirkVVIAMkb 8rK6sytE96STJe51S7mWPkAuJ48urUtsUTJ6Y= Received: by 10.115.89.1 with SMTP id r1mr7669327wal.12.1217383749191; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.32.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0807291909q519504d0p3a32c549c799e423@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:09:08 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <488FCC66.6090707@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8e10486b0807291110g3553cdd2i8eef9b7e41daba42@mail.gmail.com> <488F657B.3010400@FreeBSD.org> <8e10486b0807291746o50b4c63fk41d5e518f694dbb8@mail.gmail.com> <488FCC66.6090707@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.3+tmpfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:09:09 -0000 On 7/29/08, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Of course :) > > > > mdconfig -t malloc maybe ? > > > > -t swap is faster and has fewer downsides. Great !! I should read *all* the man before post... Thank you Kris! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:26:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D061065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21ECE8FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U2Q82J023584; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> Message-ID: <20080729220949.X8178@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:26:10 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Gary Kline wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:16:35PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: >> i'm on newegg.com that has a whole slew of options for narrowing the >> field. >> >> q's: is a higher contrast ratio better than a lower ratio? Generally, yes. Contrast ratio in a display is analogous to dynamic range in audio. >> is the widescreen better than the std? --i think widescreen is >> 16x9, standard is 4x3. Correct about the aspect ratios. As for "better", it depends on whether your graphics card can run at those resolutions. > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. 1280x1024 is actually a 5:4 aspect, but people use it on a 4:3 display. I'm doing that right now :^) But if you send it to a 16:9 display it will probably appear "stretched" unless you adjust the display so it's effectively not a widescreen display anymore. Every LCD or DLP or plasma display has a native resolution, which is the actual number of pixels in its imaging device. Nowadays they all have internal scan converters so that you could, for instance, send your 1280x1024 to a display of some other native resolution and get a picture, subject to some limits (e.g., I doubt any 1024x768 LCD monitor would display a 3200x2400 signal). But it will always look best at the native resolution anyway, so you're on the right track. > IFF xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) Well, yeah, that's the elephant in the room, isn't it? -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:28:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAF61065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-149.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-149.bluehost.com [67.222.38.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E9BD8FC23 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 4995 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2008 02:28:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy5.bluehost.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2008 02:28:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=lKhoZc5Kjb6k/wFbFLMp4TTe9vJDm0/JHS7skSQQlXytwNKyW3emA5yWf3XNErRy/5YC5G/NvFus0RGkjTV15KhhhEL8XpJ1IqXx/ES8TY2qvG81lW1chKTHMwxIH3fa; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KO1Q2-00030o-4I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:28:02 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:21:59 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:21:59 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080730022159.GC36138@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="raC6veAxrt5nqIoY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:28:05 -0000 --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:54:47PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Ivan Voras wrote: > > Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just > >> wanted to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on > >> Components. > >> > >> I appreciate your input on this. > >=20 > > "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating system > > consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the > > kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomic > > and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more > > specific to get a more specific answer. > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Yeah, that's true, but not very informative. Look, I don't follow OSes a= ll that > much anymore, but if I had to call up an OS that would be made up of more= of a > set of indenpendent pieces, I think I would choose the GNU Hurd OS. From > everything I read, it was never very successful, if one counts the abilit= y to > return some good throughput as being successful ... or, maybe they have s= ome > other characteristic which I'm not aware of. >=20 > Anyhow, the HURD (at least in concept) is far, far more of a component ba= sed OS > than anything else I'm aware of is. It's an interesting concept, at the = very > least, and I do understand it works. There are a bunch of modular microkernel architectures out there. Another that comes immediately to mind is the MIT Exokernel, for instance. Of course, last I checked, nobody was calling them "component-based" operating systems (especially since, in most cases, they're research kernels with a fine dusting of barely enough stuff to make them run over the top, and not really useful OSes). Microsoft has been using the phrase "component based" to talk about some of its OS research efforts, but as far as I'm aware MS has abandoned that market-speak. So . . . I still have no idea what the OP means by "component-based operating systems". --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Friedrich Nietzche: "Those who know that they are profound strive for clarity. Those who would like to seem profound to the crowd strive for obscurity." --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiP0EcACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXunQCfTNf7xxCREHHF4m8FqY5GAyd8 mnoAoKmNtGTE8AQRzut1h6YYwQxfvNO8 =s4JW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --raC6veAxrt5nqIoY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:31:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883131065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4272F8FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so338300ana.13 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=v66lrRbEzi4/gfp8k1RTKNom/ZBJSB7wdLkZubRTqiA=; b=CSrNlWYSQxDHiLsdVAvBq+2IBAs2RX8Nl1GbMyrSwuEkmJYH0+ODhgEsDflLoK9ywx zkuAdekeFOejRaOZaB+LaYIQWcuQa0W8I3lZLG9YH0b/ofCTgxxZ3DyCqHd1gKjh61r4 jmGwpM3skCYw0AmKDbSxUiuYIuaxKVX17itjQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ckJa695KRMrBeoIj/gyw0XRO8kA1Jhc7qkcuBIfzCrSRhGbJV5Jd4qKT9Gz1Wir6jS bB5zUfIRiIrDVFFG+K1cZcS0UMY3GpOs+Gvg4aJJ9Cg/L+iB5DBJTNjNJDxgi+7F6XI/ mEd2NtVxpanwAfQPPn6sCbKhqFdvVhk5KdfoE= Received: by 10.100.144.11 with SMTP id r11mr11617000and.140.1217383561644; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807291906i1fc77b98mf9b1414724c38a51@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:06:01 -0400 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: "Daniel Bye" , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20080726104530.GD49340@torus.slightlystrange.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <235b80000807251801u242157efre4c4a17092220391@mail.gmail.com> <20080726083733.J26794@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080726104530.GD49340@torus.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: upgrade from 6.3 to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:31:14 -0000 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Daniel Bye < freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 08:38:08AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > k > > >Hi > > > > > >I ve got 6.3 stable database server. Can i directly upgrade my server > from > > >6.3 to 7.0 > > > > > yes. > > anyway - if your server works fine - why? > > Because 7 is demonstrably faster than 6.x? Define "faster than 6.x"? :-) > Because local policy requires > the upgrade? Because he wants to run 7? > > -- > Daniel Bye > _ > ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > - against HTML, vCards and X > - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ > -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:32:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7891065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com [69.89.18.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C3298FC2A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 26403 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2008 02:31:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2008 02:31:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=K8kmc3X8BlqhQRVugvs/gQqIrNtZWqXaKSszEKogiDc7JCZuVRMIKeMXQ5irqtcpkgFxtT35l31IWtYpGYiYN3ChxRqAbOFQQlMyQIEBZDJYaiw8E5Rlfw5zBzH5qocE; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KO1To-00048f-RB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:31:57 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:25:53 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:25:53 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080730022553.GD36138@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080728200902.EE19B1065684@hub.freebsd.org> <20080729175728.GA41238@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080729175728.GA41238@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:32:00 -0000 --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:57:28PM -0500, David Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:09:15AM +0300, John Dakos [ Enovation Technolo= gies ] wrote: >=20 > [2224 lines deleted] >=20 > If you want help, start by learning that quoting entire email digests is > frowned upon. =2E . . and try actually adding some text of your own while you're at it. Yikes. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Albert Camus: "An intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself." --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiP0TEACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKW0QACgttFhLRI/HT8S3jmaqLwkGUTD jOMAn1RUZGUUOrzuBMf+OVlyoQgWuadP =M9LO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:42:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00889106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com [69.89.18.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C481F8FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 6575 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2008 02:42:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2008 02:42:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=Ro5h/qPeg/bgH04E9O4wTTnC7fa6NSC/fEKuV2pzLimxuKJh0P8NY3dHeU14EO718BrOFkXn+cAhlIMIuXg6dbPQY86zgtuzXnqIDxW3b4SmSQ451kOXzIAN77PgAewI; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KO1dw-0007Gd-8r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:42:24 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:36:21 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:36:21 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20080730023246.GE36138@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20080729181904.GA35291@kokopelli.hydra> <488F68E2.2090409@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dgjlcl3Tl+kb3YDk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <488F68E2.2090409@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: formatting the time in tcsh prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:42:28 -0000 --dgjlcl3Tl+kb3YDk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 03:00:50PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Chad Perrin wrote: > | This might be slightly off-topic, I suppose -- but since (t)csh is the > | default shell for FreeBSD, I figured this might be a good place to ask. > | > | I'm aware of the %T option for showing 24-hour time in my tcsh prompt, > | but it doesn't do exactly what I would like. Inserting a call to the > | date command so I can have the exact formatting I want appears to fail = by > | only calculating the time once, and showing the same time every time the > | prompt appears -- which means that, several hours later, I'm still > | looking at the time from when the shell instance was started. > | > | The prompt setting using the date command that I used is as follows: > | > | set prompt =3D "[`date +'%H%M'`] %~%# " > | > ... > | There must be some way to do this. Right? > | >=20 > Hi Chad, >=20 > Right! Try this: >=20 > set prompt=3D' % ' > alias precmd 'printf "[%s]" "`date +'%H%M'`"' Most excellent! Thank you. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Peter Norvig: "Use the most natural notation available to solve the problem, and then worry about writing an interpreter for that notation." --dgjlcl3Tl+kb3YDk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiP06UACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVvrACdGhyymnvQ+na90WRj7NZ6ZTX9 WRUAn0HeJ64rXiwXgZ47Bz41j7VjwQB3 =iIBE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dgjlcl3Tl+kb3YDk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 02:45:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B209D1065679 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: from web52206.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52206.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E0678FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alydiomc@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60132 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jul 2008 02:45:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=41D9SQO6uW5YqRk2Nst4bpiQJCqEmoFDuHh9GJx1SgWWFd9Edy0wybEOPpf4rNP7KuzeuAPGAAzy8rjzeoywefnCQ4fdeQHOsTjYvX6zvOmhBKA0m9eVRv8yFVif89az9BOzsKO4Er0MngkFhEmMb4WBCKZHqp7+4C2xBLD1Vrk=; Received: from [202.57.64.100] by web52206.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: lyd mc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <691584.59242.qm@web52206.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:54:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: odhiambo@gmail.com, darko.listsniffer@gmail.com, jeffrey@goldmark.org Subject: Re: email disclaimer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: alydiomc@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:45:15 -0000 Hi guys, I think I should stick to currently available=A0 feature offered by=A0 mime= defang=A0 or altermime for=A0 the disclaimer=A0 thing.=20 Thank you darko, odhiambo and jeffrey for your time.=20 Best regards, alydiomc =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 04:07:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568BD1065675 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1B88FC1D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U47nEi043829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:07:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id m6U47mlr043827; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:07:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:07:48 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Wyatt Neal Message-ID: <20080730040748.GD38660@dan.emsphone.com> References: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty building a cross-compiler with a fresh install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:07:51 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 29), Wyatt Neal said: > i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm > having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the > system. > > the first issue that shows is: > > In file included from archive.c:132: > sysdep.h:173:21: libintl.h: No such file or directory > > this comes from the libintl.h being located in /usr/local/include > instead of /usr/include. a simple modification to the CFLAGS as so: > > export CFLAGS="-I /usr/local/include" > > has resolved binutils building correctly. a build of gcc shows the > same issue; however, gcc fails to build with the following error: > > gcc -c -I /usr/local/include -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic > -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./. -I./../include > ./config/i386/i386.c -o i386.o > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: `ix86_svr3_asm_out_constructor' undeclared here (not in a function) > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.asm_out.constructor') > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.asm_out') > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.sched') > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: initializer element is not constant > ./config/i386/i386.c:1033: error: (near initialization for `targetm.calls') > ./config/i386/i386.c: In function `ix86_file_end': > ./config/i386/i386.c:4839: warning: implicit declaration of function `ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME' > gmake[1]: *** [i386.o] Error 1 > > both binutils and gcc are being built from the source from > ftp.gnu.org following along with > http://docs.freebsd.org/info/gcc/gcc.info.Cross-Compiler.html > > i've not encountered this error before on the various linux systems > so i'm assuming it's something that i'm doing with being new to > freebsd. i've been able to compile the above code on my ubuntu system > without issue as well so i'm fairly certain it's something i'm > screwing up on freebsd. > > bintuils 2.18 config string: > ./configure --target=i386v --program-prefix=i386v- --prefix=/usr/local > > gcc 3.4.4 config string: > ./configure --target=i386v --program-prefix=i386v- --prefix=/usr/local > --program-suffix="" > > thoughts? Take a look at the devel/cross-binutils and devel/cross-gcc ports. The cross-gcc port is at 4.2.3, so you may have to just copy what it does and build gcc-3.4.4 manually. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 04:12:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67D5106567B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (oldagora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835C98FC17 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m6U4CknW094028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m6U4CkMS094026; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14290; Tue, 29 Jul 08 21:04:14 PDT Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:53 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Message-Id: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:51 -0000 > [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size directly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 04:50:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44D3106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427F78FC25 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6U4oImt014925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:50:24 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U4oILj047946; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:50:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6U4oGs0047780; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:50:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:50:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> (Giorgos Keramidas's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:34 +0300") Message-ID: <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6U4oImt014925 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.014, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:30 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:34 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:53 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>> [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... >> >> Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer >> to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that >> the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? >> >> I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In >> case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and >> I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size >> directly. > > Setting the interface MTU should do it, i.e.: > > ifconfig re0 mtu 640 > > Not all interfaces support setting the MTU and some may have > range restrictions though. In particular, this seems to work with my wlan0 interface, but not with my re0 interface. The wlan0 interface correctly limits the maximum TCP segment size to 500 bytes when I set the MTU: # ifconfig wlan0 | fgrep mtu wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 # ifconfig wlan0 down; ifconfig wlan0 mtu 50 up Then a tcpdump to save SSH traffic to a particular host, and a dump of the resulting pcap shows: # tcpdump -s 2000 -l -vvv -w save.pcap 'host a.b.c.d port 22' Got 42^C # echo ` tcpdump -n -l -vvv -r save.pcap 2>/dev/null | \ sed -e 's/.* length //' -e 's/).*//' ` | fmt 60 60 52 91 52 91 500 500 340 356 52 52 76 204 196 500 260 52 68 52 100 100 116 116 500 132 52 500 84 52 500 196 52 84 116 100 164 436 52 100 132 52 This should work for *both* sides of the connection because of the initial maximum segment size negotiation between the two TCP hosts. See for example the two first packets of the capture I mentioned above, and look for the 'mss' option: 07:38:19.554338 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 44805, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.1.???.53468 > X.Y.Z.W.22: S, cksum 0x20d6 (correct), 4195632487:4195632487(0) win 65535 07:38:19.591065 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 54, id 39804, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) X.Y.Z.W.22 > 192.168.1.???.53468: S, cksum 0x7f2f (correct), 901580944:901580944(0) ack 4195632488 win 65535 The MSS advertised is less than 500 to leave some space for the IP and TCP headers, but the full IP datagram _length_ that I displayed in the fmt(1) output above shows that the full MTU is used some times for the IP datagrams sent or received. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 04:51:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913A106569D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF2F8FC4D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so318160rvf.43 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=XVaC1ictEsPDJP/b9xIwa+ldgB5hWhRDtNkiR8uiSgk=; b=C1I/UkXCZoJhv2IA7hg52dtrixzKk5cGqbG4ym783UPzRHBz0AcWyoQ4lH5ngmMaHS /cd0zGlhq18axy9KgIxUvznK6zAjAWeTOebba6aRP8iNH80EVGO7gTsYfk2ifda3OM4F xqjuWGWOhVLQsYhnzkgt5SM7fhhjhn2QODVNg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XtyCBOqaAqiItYQ3ajbtNGBDkXEDj5PXzuCrGCzU7muvBxWKWO4igGfhPjwhfcnMuG 8d2nEmdXCTQkxPDRAtRQ3DmqOOpMwR5LU44bflHzy13pGS5eC8utACx2/l9mU+HSA/jS DdodkyW8dj7qaE+eRuyVo5oM7+7QrOy+mSvxE= Received: by 10.140.134.15 with SMTP id h15mr3922971rvd.65.1217393512595; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:51:52 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:54 -0000 Hi list, (I already ask this on -net, but I get no answers) I have two 100Mbit link (L2L, lan to lan) between the company and our datacenter, on each side I have two redudant (pf+carp) firewalls. I configured one vlan for each 100Mbit link and used carp to do the failover between machines on each side, the vlan interfaces are configured without ip address (with Max's carpdev patch), only carp interfaces have ips. I want to use OpenOSPFD to distribute our internal routes and do automatic failover+loadbalance of this two 100Mbit links. This work ? Someone have a similar setup ? Any hints ? I'm using FreeBSD 7, OpenOSPFD 4 (from ports) and Max's carpdev patch. Best Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 04:55:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5C7106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A88FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6U4aatU014373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:41 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6U4aaxF062256; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6U4aZ6N062131; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:36:34 +0300 In-Reply-To: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> (perryh@pluto.rain.com's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:53 -0700") Message-ID: <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6U4aatU014373 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.769, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.37, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:55:14 -0000 On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:04:53 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... > > Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer > to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that > the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? > > I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In > case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and > I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size > directly. Setting the interface MTU should do it, i.e.: ifconfig re0 mtu 640 Not all interfaces support setting the MTU and some may have range restrictions though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:08:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0893B1065678 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enkhbate@gmail.com) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAEA8FC1D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enkhbate@gmail.com) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so1620382hue.8 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:07:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=eRBIYaGocAkn/plM/PM+t0bbbn8TijKlQhN1aC2fj/M=; b=TPHZPwSoWa/8NpcqTCzfak1maEKM4EyaTtNs+JieGonWK/BrIrdeM3pJ4JjypOor8S Id5SPmlz4/hd1/szenX0cj20EwJIAiS2EwJu0R0aU10jJIJnje0g7M/d8q5L1xkmQNT6 PU2PJoZoaDAlPVh7Ibm1LKBDqjQyPlexfVv1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cAhiJP23lLEoQLxp1K4kn/QVPdMz+RfVRdpcsPya29NjxS/Myb6mbKwAVzLMCcrtHk K7/ySfYrouFjyjD9NpcZh6lv4mb2mR+Ec0H9BYDQp8BENgRJ61YCowtNUP1K8GYWYhGE 4/R69Uj+5/w5WUSXfeBz6wegBG0jMpYWXgT0g= Received: by 10.125.159.1 with SMTP id l1mr408581mko.143.1217400723561; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.95.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:52:02 +0900 From: "Enebish Enkhbat" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:08:01 -0000 Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz' by URL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:09:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FE11065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za) Received: from a.mail.ru.ac.za (a.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF228FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za) Received: from iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.249]:61831) by a.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KO5nx-000EmV-5u; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:09:01 +0200 Received: from iwr61.iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.161]) by iwr.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KO5nx-000CMo-4X; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:09:01 +0200 From: "DA Forsyth" Organization: IWR To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:09:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <48902FAC.24168.D02970A@iwrtech.iwr.ru.ac.za> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20080730011305.AB5FF1065755@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20080730011305.AB5FF1065755@hub.freebsd.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: a.mail.ru.ac.za (146.231.129.33) Cc: coertw2@gawab.com Subject: Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:09:06 -0000 On 30 Jul 2008 , freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org entreated about "freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 6": > Message: 26 > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:24:49 +0200 > From: Coert Waagmeester > Subject: local mirrors of ports and packages? > To: FreeBSD-questions > > Hi all! > > I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. > > What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and > packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and > expensive. > > How many data would it be in total? Hi Coert LOTS of data (-: But, there is a SA mirror or two, so you don't have to do it yourself http://freebsd.mirror.ac.za/ ftp://freebsd.mirror.ac.za ftp://ftp.za.freebsd.org/ > Thanks in advance, > Coert > > FreeBSD newbie I've been running several servers on FreeBSD since 2004 and sometimes I still feel like a newby. I run Fedora at home. -- DA Fo rsyth Network Supervisor Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:12:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27889106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (oldagora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5A8FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m6U7CgGq014118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:12:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m6U7Cg5V014117; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14682; Wed, 30 Jul 08 00:09:05 PDT Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:09:45 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Message-Id: <489013b9.Pt7+7kznBXs3SSP+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:12:46 -0000 > >> Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer > >> to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that > >> the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? > >> > >> I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In > >> case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and > >> I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size > >> directly. > > > > Setting the interface MTU should do it, i.e.: > > > > ifconfig re0 mtu 640 > > > > Not all interfaces support setting the MTU and some may have > > range restrictions though. > > In particular, this seems to work with my wlan0 interface, but > not with my re0 interface ... That's certainly simple enough, and xl0 apparently supports the reduced mtu setting. It seems to be working just fine. Thanks! I'd thought of trying to set the sun's MTU, but hadn't been able to find a way to do it. It had never occurred to me that setting the *recipient's* MTU would limit the *sender's* packet size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:17:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369D9106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za) Received: from a.mail.ru.ac.za (a.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FDF8FC17 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za) Received: from iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.249]:57842) by a.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KO5wW-000Fa7-H9; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:17:52 +0200 Received: from iwr61.iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.161]) by iwr.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KO5wW-000CVt-GH; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:17:52 +0200 From: "DA Forsyth" Organization: IWR To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:17:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <489031BF.24263.D0AB29A@iwrtech.iwr.ru.ac.za> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20080730011305.AB5FF1065755@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20080730011305.AB5FF1065755@hub.freebsd.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: a.mail.ru.ac.za (146.231.129.33) Cc: coertw2@gawab.com Subject: Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: iwrTech@iwr.ru.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:17:54 -0000 On 30 Jul 2008 , freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org entreated about "freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 6": > Yes, I am currently rsyncing: > ftp://ftp.is.co.za/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/ > > Is this the correct data? And where in FreeBSD do I change the mirror > list or installation source? type 'man make.conf' look for 'master site backup'. but, you don't need to download all the packages, only the ones you need to install, surely? When I test installed 7.0R I burnt a set of CD's that contain most common packages for the basic install. After that I fetched ports as needed (after updating the ports tree of course). However, you will find a number of ports that only exist in their own hosts, and never appear on the usual servers, so having a mirror won't help. If you are installing several boxes with the same packages, then download to one and transfer the package files to the others locally. You can do this via flash stick, NFS, ftp, scp, samba share, and probably many other ways. You can also create packages from ports and then transfer your newly created package as needed (I do this for my print servers which have a minimal install and do not have a full ports tree) -- DA Fo rsyth Network Supervisor Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:19:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771551065675 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2B18FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so274628fgb.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n/GQ4dR5U1ktULfIf6v/Nlb/6rOdt083zNbhIl4L2UI=; b=YiQ2+9xvRfW7COWq0q9ZbAmwfMDIFjbYAFGuHYGlH9RJpErmpfd99NPkQvGg/anU/J SBsmQjSChVYdlzVHd0LX6axQ9pWTnbli3SRlMrCnUMRKjh9D3rYBe7UZ+8OtmjPT91M/ CpbaX2d2x63KzwGP/YSNFISBXH8ozl+qaVYrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qv2ZclZ/u96nsF4eUpzZTAd9EaAp7TL2fdZGz/7wFdx0I81HXWX81qpjGbJ+qhWeNU 9mc/2xGuUpSCxs+Mcs9w1+T316+2R7zKk4VLZcj6fxsjQ874pyofCBYei6DeXtBbOGfG xeJ9Vz3yS7VVyQ642xYDlnC3EyL4MV6knHa+Q= Received: by 10.86.98.10 with SMTP id v10mr4554741fgb.39.1217402375743; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [79.130.48.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm716609fga.2.2008.07.30.00.19.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48901605.2030909@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:19:33 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Enebish Enkhbat References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:19:37 -0000 Enebish Enkhbat wrote: > Error: FTP Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch ' > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz' > by URL > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Well, packages for 6.2-RELEASE have been removed from the FTP server. Try setting the PACKAGESITE env. variable to ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/ Still, I don't see the package you are looking for. Closest match is p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz Check the FTP directory listing using a browser to confirm what you actually want. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:30:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBDE1065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FC548FC1D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 58691 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 10:48:47 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO domino.procreditbank.bg) (10.0.0.15) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2008 10:48:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: To: "Enebish Enkhbat" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.2 September 26, 2006 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:30:52 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO/BULGARIA/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2FP2|May 14, 2007) at 30.07.2008 10:30:53, Serialize complete at 30.07.2008 10:30:53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:30:54 -0000 I propose you to update your ports tree. What are you searching for is very old and out of date. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD "Enebish Enkhbat" Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 30.07.2008 10:09 To freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc Subject problem Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/Mail-SpamAssassin.tbz' by URL _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 08:07:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E84106567D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipcop@bosveldgraan.co.za) Received: from ctb-mesg-2-2.saix.net (ctb-mesg-2-2.saix.net [196.25.240.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60E28FC28 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipcop@bosveldgraan.co.za) Received: from ipcop.localdomain (dsl-244-40-201.telkomadsl.co.za [41.244.40.201]) by ctb-mesg-2-2.saix.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A66123F4B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:29:16 +0200 (SAST) From: ipcop@bosveldgraan.co.za Sender: root@ipcop.localdomain To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080730072917.0A66123F4B@ctb-mesg-2-2.saix.net> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:29:16 +0200 (SAST) Subject: [Copfilter] Copy of quarantined email - *** SPAM *** [8.0/6.0] Re: local mirrors of ports and packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:07:47 -0000 On 30 Jul 2008 , freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org entreated about "freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 226, Issue 6": > Message: 26 > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:24:49 +0200 > From: Coert Waagmeester > Subject: local mirrors of ports and packages? > To: FreeBSD-questions > > Hi all! > > I am quite new to FreeBSD. I am quite a boffin on Linux though. > > What I would like to know is, how can I make local mirrors of ports and > packages? I live in South-Africa, and bandwidth is painfully slow and > expensive. > > How many data would it be in total? Hi Coert LOTS of data (-: But, there is a SA mirror or two, so you don't have to do it yourself http://freebsd.mirror.ac.za/ ftp://freebsd.mirror.ac.za ftp://ftp.za.freebsd.org/ > Thanks in advance, > Coert > > FreeBSD newbie I've been running several servers on FreeBSD since 2004 and sometimes I still feel like a newby. I run Fedora at home. -- DA Fo rsyth Network Supervisor Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:04:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E404106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6CB8FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unassigned5.the.namesco.net (126.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m6U94eF2057976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:04:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <48902EAC.3090703@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:04:44 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Collins References: <1b30fd140807291632v491323d4jb4371ec1303bd5a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1b30fd140807291632v491323d4jb4371ec1303bd5a9@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pxeboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:04:47 -0000 David Collins wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure if this is the correct list to post this to, and if it > isn't please could you point me to where it should go. > > I have recently turned to freeBSD and so far I love it. I have a small > laptop that I use for playing around and general fiddling. I was using > the Debian netinstall and booting over pxe/tftp when I wanted to > reinstall. I started looking at the automated install, but it seemed > very complex. I have been looking at the freeBSD option and it seems > that the automated intall is very simple (at least from a user point > of view). > > I have been trying to get pxeboot to work, so far with no luck. I have > a dhcp/tftp server set up and I am able to push pxeboot across the > network, so I assume that is all ok. NFS is also setup, at least I was > getting nfs errors that I don't have anymore. I copied the contents of > the 7.0 cd into the my tftpboot folder and changed the contents for > loader.conf and loader.rc according to here > http://www.locolomo.org/pub/pxeboot/pxeboot.html and > http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml and so far I > am able to get a prompt come up but I am unable to get any further. As > soon as I enter anything the computer immediately reboots so i am > unable to see any error messages. I assume the paths are relative to > the tftp server. Can anyone give me quick example to get me off to a > start. > > http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/pxeboot_serial_install.html is a pretty good guide, you can ignore the bits about rebuilding pxeboot as your not using a serial console but the mfs_root bug could be what you are hitting. Vince > Thanks > > David Collins > > > Here are my config files, I think that is all of them > # cat /etc/exports > /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0 -alldirs -ro -maproot=root > > # cat /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf > default-lease-time 600; > max-lease-time 7200; > authoritative; > > ddns-update-style none; > > subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { > range 192.168.2.8 192.168.2.15; > #filename "/pxelinux.0"; > filename "/freeBSD7.0/boot/pxeboot"; > next-server 192.168.2.4; > option routers 192.168.2.4; > option root-path "/usr2/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0"; > } > > # grep tftp /etc/inetd.conf > tftp dgram udp wait root /usr/libexec/tftpd tftpd > -l -s /usr/tftpboot > > #cat /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0/boot/loader.rc > echo Loading Kernel... > set choice=freebsd-ide > read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice > include /boot/loader.rc-$choice > read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice > read -t 5 -p "Type in your selection EXACTLY: " choice > load /boot/kernel/kernel > load linux.ko > echo \007\007 > set vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/md0c" > > #cat /usr/tftpboot/freeBSD7.0/boot/loader.conf > init_path="/stand/sysinstall" > rootfs_load="YES" > rootfs_name="/boot/mfsroot" > rootfs_type="mfs_root" > vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/md0c" > autoboot_delay=5 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:23:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A35106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D927B8FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so269200wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=RkAyKJnK7JVXxsYo/3Nplnb8SArn28mkIuktbEZW9C0=; b=UYOiumN+aV+Bi+JYBtl2gFvT4/HwEhk+yaVqrUWgyuZHosMY28Et1gCiiJaIvfc8c0 b4rdYTNsXZbtjTQ6OSEcbmgcqDegjli3kNvfeBGaal3q/NJUCUacLhz3TyN2MAxCkkg/ 2IXZ8kpS9d4pi1O8Z2ZCbLWmkpgGYtuTXMxJk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SUtFPyP0giv9zcxyuySFURDbU+FSANPKanPHpEhYQfq7QeKwmDyaocRMTaFt+jJL9+ uC0XPVNt+ABxkFHBoq6ALucoXcE4PmLbmWXlCrDXrWR5bt0e6Vx7P5vWmzkPFDILJrs5 XIo3w0E3YPTLMAWFK68hs2VgZ+ZaEMAGWK2io= Received: by 10.142.223.20 with SMTP id v20mr2564403wfg.152.1217408074078; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660807300154ue4e5a0cyb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:54:33 -0600 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: dumping mounted file systems with insufficient space... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:23:48 -0000 Before I try this on a live server... I can use dump(8) an active, mounted file systems via the -L flag. According to the manual, this first creates a snapshot of the file system, to the .snap directory of the file systems root. What if the file system to be dumped, does not have sufficient free-space to store a snapshot? Can I still safely dump(8) a mounted file system? -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:32:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EF61065678 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (llca513-a.servidoresdns.net [217.76.128.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ED18FC16 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from mail.dsa.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FB61104047 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 217.114.136.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user faf352c) by mail.dsa.es with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:31:13 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:31:13 -0000 (GMT) From: "DSA - JCR" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:10 -0000 Hi all FreeBSD 6.2 I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance Juan Coruña Desarrollo de Software Atlantico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:39:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8FA106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (llca513-a.servidoresdns.net [217.76.128.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1A68FC23 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juancr@dsa.es) Received: from mail.dsa.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9871104034 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 217.114.136.134 (SquirrelMail authenticated user faf352c) by mail.dsa.es with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:38:26 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:38:26 -0000 (GMT) From: "DSA - JCR" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: protecting my FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:39:22 -0000 HI all again I would like to know if there is a method to know how well protected is my system (FreeBSD 6.2) in order to not permit a user to enter as root. I need it because I have intellectual propierty in that box, and I know some people is interested on it. I use inetd, and I have all ports disable except Samba because it is a repository for Windows Docs in a network. (swap is not enable). My root password is almost 20 chars with numbers, normal and capitals letters, points. there is a user that belongs to operator with a script for (un)mounting USB disk in which I trap almost all signals (about 15). thanks in advance Juan Coruña Desarrollo de Software Atlantico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:44:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147C41065671 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BD28FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:44:05 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m6U9i4SW004914; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:44:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:44:04 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: DSA - JCR Message-ID: <20080730094404.GA4612@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2008 09:44:05.0537 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE649110:01C8F228] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:44:08 -0000 El día Wednesday, July 30, 2008 a las 09:31:13AM -0000, DSA - JCR escribió: > Hi all > > FreeBSD 6.2 > > I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to > split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also > save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. > > I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) > > Can anyone help me? ¿Será que hablas de /usr/ports/sysutils/screen? Could it be /usr/ports/sysutils/screen? Saludos matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ We should all learn from the peoples of The Netherlands, France and Ireland. Aprendamos todos de los pueblos de Holanda, Francia e Irlanda. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:58:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9187106566B; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B678FC19; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id EB1871420EE; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:38:41 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from iris.teledomenet.local (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B71142106; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:38:11 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:39:58 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807301239.59573.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Alexandre Biancalana Subject: Re: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:05 -0000 On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:51:52 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > Hi list, (I already ask this on -net, but I get no answers) > > I have two 100Mbit link (L2L, lan to lan) between the company and our > datacenter, on each side I have two redudant (pf+carp) firewalls. > > I configured one vlan for each 100Mbit link and used carp to do the > failover between machines on each side, the vlan interfaces are > configured without ip address (with Max's > carpdev patch), only carp interfaces have ips. > > I want to use OpenOSPFD to distribute our internal routes and do > automatic failover+loadbalance of this two 100Mbit links. > > This work ? Someone have a similar setup ? Any hints ? I think using OSPF and CARP on the same interface could have unexpected results. I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy and load balancing. Do you have to use OSPF? That is, is there an OSPF domain in which you have to be part of? Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:58:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9187106566B; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B678FC19; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id EB1871420EE; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:38:41 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from iris.teledomenet.local (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B71142106; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:38:11 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:39:58 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807301239.59573.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Alexandre Biancalana Subject: Re: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:05 -0000 On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:51:52 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > Hi list, (I already ask this on -net, but I get no answers) > > I have two 100Mbit link (L2L, lan to lan) between the company and our > datacenter, on each side I have two redudant (pf+carp) firewalls. > > I configured one vlan for each 100Mbit link and used carp to do the > failover between machines on each side, the vlan interfaces are > configured without ip address (with Max's > carpdev patch), only carp interfaces have ips. > > I want to use OpenOSPFD to distribute our internal routes and do > automatic failover+loadbalance of this two 100Mbit links. > > This work ? Someone have a similar setup ? Any hints ? I think using OSPF and CARP on the same interface could have unexpected results. I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy and load balancing. Do you have to use OSPF? That is, is there an OSPF domain in which you have to be part of? Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 09:58:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E5D10656C0 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CB58FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so279449wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:58:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=615WCW6ryeKFB0cWiYw38DAgokQd4SAxdlrHrk29Rw4=; b=u0CRfhmI8g0k0hybpo1Y1JN3mf6owlAy15EzmxKq111ZAtBLYtzU9aFAyfQpG+gmCv 9jNAqSjNBOFxUbimeMxyxdh/QHDFg6RFJRh4cDhFBykZ6oAsHDFeg0w6zu6HWfZQjSQP ki2zDCtfzTGOWC++GrZucEd8rUXML0VzF8tKA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ffpHIc00twPPJvPOjB7f7tW45VO91pYKad1hVEDCgErtVN23LVS55WCR4EWM10cZdl upZllsJhHrenerf50imSnawrfyjDPt+z1iYrnh4j+WlkLOx+GFaO5ZOb5JYsx0wtjljz C8pVtbqqLgDRjYT3kwHoKfixJ5fISKzAIitVs= Received: by 10.142.161.13 with SMTP id j13mr2580563wfe.230.1217411904510; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.141.18 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <235b80000807300258o31902324v250002d24db4a9c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:58:24 +0300 From: "tethys ocean" To: "Jerry McAllister" In-Reply-To: <20080727025929.GD36346@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <235b80000807251801u242157efre4c4a17092220391@mail.gmail.com> <20080725212512.5b4d1e3b@verizon.net> <20080727025929.GD36346@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Gurvich Subject: Re: upgrade from 6.3 to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:58:25 -0000 *Hi again * *This is a database server. I checked the port tree and saw that all of them are updated except for mysql. Some list members have commented that upgrading freebsd 6.2 to 7.0 stable may result in port conflicts and installing the entire ports hierarchy rather than upgrading them would be a better solution. However, it is necessary to compile them again after installing the ports and this might result in conflicts with the sources or dependencies of previous packages. I will test all these options.* On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:25:12PM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > > > You should not do the upgrade, > > > Whatever would cause you to give such poor advice? > > > > though you can. ZFS is still > > experimental on FreeBSD though you can certainly use zfs pools on your > > existing system. > > It works. > > ////jerry > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Share now a pigeon's flight Bluebound along the ancient skies, Its women forever hair and mammal, A Mediterranean town may arise If you rip apart a pigeon's heart. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 10:03:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04491065692 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8B98FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UA2xFO092135; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:02:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m6UA2xFO092135 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217412179; bh=KGWjtIBHUmuduy 0t6Jb6FC1xrOl/dHpsjlt+A9tM9so=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<48903C4C.2090902@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Wed,=2 030=20Jul=202008=2011:02:52=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Modulok=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@free bsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20dumping=20mounted=20file=20systems=20with= 20insufficient=20space...|References:=20<64c038660807300154ue4e5a0c yb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<64c03866080730015 4ue4e5a0cyb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200. 95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0 D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3 D"------------enigF7867D4E2875AEA7FA27DBBD"; b=1aFuPbebMA95N2Agvjku RH4vO1eIY8eJ3pAhZuS7rAil89Pdp/OcL8YdS8oHOhWzzTplKJ+pah/TUch6ZgeJbur V7Ch+ZYCC4vPe6E8YmN9CNCAhxdaIaQ4nihYNpIqZMgfwBxAqCfVTAMgplaCEqpiv8f sYElQgdxq1FV0Q2+I= Message-ID: <48903C4C.2090902@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:02:52 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Modulok References: <64c038660807300154ue4e5a0cyb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660807300154ue4e5a0cyb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF7867D4E2875AEA7FA27DBBD" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:02:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7888/Wed Jul 30 08:23:13 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dumping mounted file systems with insufficient space... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:03:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF7867D4E2875AEA7FA27DBBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Modulok wrote: > Before I try this on a live server... >=20 > I can use dump(8) an active, mounted file systems via the -L flag. > According to the manual, this first creates a snapshot of the file > system, to the .snap directory of the file systems root. What if the > file system to be dumped, does not have sufficient free-space to store > a snapshot? Can I still safely dump(8) a mounted file system? A snapshot doesn't take any significant /extra/ space itself. Rather it = consists of marking the state of the system at that time and provides a view (via the .snap directory) of that state of the filesystem. Of cours= e,=20 subsequent modifications of the filesystem can cause more space than=20 otherwise expected to be used up -- as both the snapshot and the latest=20 versions of anything have to be kept around -- but how much impact this h= as=20 depends entirely on the IO traffic characteristics of your particular=20 filesystem and cannot be predicted in any useful fashion without a great deal more information. If snapshots won't work for you, another trick (if you can swing it) is t= o=20 have the data on a RAID1 mirror. Then you can detach one of the mirrors,= =20 back it up and then reattach the mirror. Doing this with gmirror is a simple matter of writing about a 10 line shell script. Other mirroring=20 hard/soft-ware may be less cooperative. However you do it, this will involve an extended period while mirrors resynchronise after the backup where your file system won't have the desired level of resilience. If you can't use snapshots, can't split the mirror and you can't unmount the filesystem, then the next best thing is to make the filesystem as=20 quiescent as possible. Basically, shut down any processes using the=20 filesystem. That's probably as unacceptable as any of the other alternatives -- in which case, you can still go ahead and dump the=20 filesystem, but don't expect the generated dump to be 100% consistent.=20 It will be 'good enough' for some purposes, but files actively involved in IO at the time the dump is made are likely to be corrupted. =20 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF7867D4E2875AEA7FA27DBBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiQPFMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyIhQCfQI3HgoJnQFf5yUtdtPOTJcJ9 iVMAn2etwcDxCF7dqxUA0SNr6TCqCU2i =c048 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF7867D4E2875AEA7FA27DBBD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 10:05:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0FB1065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16988FC20 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so339505fgb.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uf+qPhHeJUes6SgPcjsqtHc5PoqXMOQNxeelYF4Z0ZE=; b=UUUvRMI4VIWO4+0gl6PwoLC/hXzGItKgBvWA6fxAd4aLQwSDdRMLsGkpcGPVRut2Ni iZ5nVDc46Sf5Ml6w7Fx9Mv0clHXX4W2guikuJwx7aVhxRgSRJ8GWUghUHauTRbcH50Jj 3fssYos8LQOGEpZfdOo3WjF+NX7MVRWziC/uY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MC4UKRU0oqauVtVwyW1+WhlPYkYLwuz0pNKP2GVkawa2MsQSrjUz4CQEjU4dfOTR1E SMESmqfWeOWiRuvBkKjL5jh+ZFSAHtMLFiCmQbJjHCaKFETomodeUgFizluRPFhvZGcf 82pu2qeZ5FwyHJNpClGIQc0d/TsTpn+hB7XFU= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr4684389fgd.63.1217412325510; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [79.130.48.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm917936fgb.7.2008.07.30.03.05.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48903CE2.1040003@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:05:22 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DSA - JCR References: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> In-Reply-To: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: protecting my FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:05:27 -0000 DSA - JCR wrote: > HI all again > > I would like to know if there is a method to know how well protected is my > system (FreeBSD 6.2) in order to not permit a user to enter as root. > I need it because I have intellectual propierty in that box, and I know > some people is interested on it. > > I use inetd, and I have all ports disable except Samba because it is a > repository for Windows Docs in a network. (swap is not enable). > > My root password is almost 20 chars with numbers, normal and capitals > letters, points. > > there is a user that belongs to operator with a script for (un)mounting > USB disk in which I trap almost all signals (about 15). > > thanks in advance > > Juan Coruña > Desarrollo de Software Atlantico > > You do realize this is not an easy question to answer, right? Security is mostly about applying good practices, and is more of a (never ending) process and not a system. FreeBSD gives you all the tools you need to build a very secure system, but it is up to you. First things to consider: what you want to protect, from whom, what kind of access (if any) they have to the machine. A strong root password is good, but not of much use if someone can walk to the machine and reboot it to single user mode, or even worse get the disk and run. You already say about a user with operator rights. If it is only a mount / umount operation he needs to perform, a very specific sudo would be better IMHO. And if it is really local users you are concerned about, I would suggest encryption. And as an extra measure, mark the system console as insecure in /etc/ttys From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 10:27:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74889106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E208FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UAR0og057919; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:27:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6UAQxoN057916; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:27:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:26:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Manolis Kiagias In-Reply-To: <48903CE2.1040003@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080730122647.D57908@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> <48903CE2.1040003@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: DSA - JCR , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: protecting my FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:12 -0000 > A strong root password is good, but not of much use if someone can walk to > the machine and reboot it to single user mode, or even worse get the disk and > run. for this - geli is excellent :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 10:27:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D3B1065676 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202F08FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UAQSjF057912; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:26:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6UAQRq3057909; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:26:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:26:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: DSA - JCR In-Reply-To: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Message-ID: <20080730122557.N57908@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: protecting my FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:27:50 -0000 > some people is interested on it. > > I use inetd, and I have all ports disable except Samba because it is a > repository for Windows Docs in a network. make sure samba listens only on internal interface. others looks ok From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 11:19:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6641065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFE18FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UBJOYI095336; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m6UBJOYI095336 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217416765; bh=m3njL6eudmGJwl 2I4zlr0ewKkyIjkV5ZZGZoKrh8GbQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<48904E36.1000706@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Wed,=2 030=20Jul=202008=2012:19:18=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20vardyh=20|CC:=20FreeBSD-questions@FreeBS D.org|Subject:=20Re:=20No=20controller=20detected=20when=20boot=20F reeBSD=207.0|References:=20<488DC689.2090102@gmail.com>=20<488DFE85 .4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<488ED323.9050303@gmail.com>|In- Reply-To:=20<488ED323.9050303@gmail.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95 .6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D= 0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D" ------------enig99386433D00C3627F777FB05"; b=iKa5r6BlORoVAxN4Vw7osl mOmSZV2FGb2GKKG1bZQXdyiMJSBcRJqki7mvZ1EjFYzsXgaZHiFnbaR91RQj6qSRmyp IaV59idXX+TLRcskDRC1ShDOWh4HbVytndOBMVkf0uSDXPbaeLesamLWFaP60a/TX0Q WQbfL35gU0veVjY= Message-ID: <48904E36.1000706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:18 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vardyh References: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <488ED323.9050303@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <488ED323.9050303@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig99386433D00C3627F777FB05" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7890/Wed Jul 30 09:50:24 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:19:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig99386433D00C3627F777FB05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable vardyh wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> vardyh wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added >>> 'console=3D"comconsole"' >>> to /boot/loader.conf and I got >>> 'hptrr: no controller detected.' >>> on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the=20 >>> 'console=3Dxxx'. >>> And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? >>> I will very appreciate for your help :> >> This is just the driver for the HighPoint Rocket Raid controller being= >> a bit too verbose. It's detected that you don't have anything compati= ble >> with hptrr(4) and (unlike the usual behaviour of most Raid Controller >> drivers (or drivers for any sort of hardware really)) it considers=20 >> this fact to be of such vital importance that it really had to print o= ut >> something on the console. Needless to say such behaviour has already = >> been quashed in 7-STABLE and will not appear in 7.1-RELEASE. >> >> In other words, it's harmless and you can just ignore it. I suspect=20 >> that this output wasn't actually triggered by your changing >> the console setting -- there's no conceivable way changing one should >> affect the other -- but that changing the way the boot messages are=20 >> displayed has managed to draw your attention to it. You probably had=20 >> it before but never noticed. > But, actually it claimed that no controller detected and asked me to > specify the root filesystem manually, which wrote: >=20 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > Manul root filesystem specification: > : Mount using filesystem > eg. ufs:da0s1a > ? List valid disk boot devices > Abort manual input >=20 > I tried ufs:/dev/ad0s1a, which was the real root filesystem registered > in my /etc/fstab, but it still could not be mounted. And the same > direction came out again to asked me to point out the root fs. >=20 > I tried '?' also, but it seems that no disk devices were found... The > kernel told me "List of GEOM managed disk devices:", and nothing but th= e > same old direction followed. Ah. This is a different problem, unrelated to the 'no controller detected' message. Unless you actually /do/ have a controller driven by hptrr(4)? Basically your problem is that /dev/ad0 has disappeared -- and as that's where the boot code expected to mount the root filesystem from, it threw a big spanner in the works. Now, ad0 can disappear for a number of reasons: * the disk has died * the disk was unplugged and then not plugged back in again properly * the disk was plugged into a different connector internally (it could appear as one of ad1, ad2 or ad3 in this case) * you changed some BIOS settings and now the system is presenting the disk as a SATA device (it could appear as ad4 or ad6 in this case) * you changed some BIOS settings and now the system has tried to generate some sort of RAID from the attached drives -- this could appear as ar0, or it could prevent FreeBSD seeing the drive(s) at all or it could have just shredded the contents of your disk and=20 left you up a gum tree. (Normally you would have had to click=20 through several dire warning messages in the last case, so this=20 eventuality shouldn't have been particularly surprising to you) Check all the connectors. Check the disk is properly seated, especially if it's a hotswap device. Try booting up the installation media or a Fre= esbie disk or any sort of LiveCD and see what hardware the kernel discove= rs at boot time. If you have been changing BIOS settings, try changing t= hem back to what they were originally. =20 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig99386433D00C3627F777FB05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiQTjwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx4lQCdErcEJ+ELlJkVbQpK6KFb1oDj TC8AoJJQqLpVz/efCd0TfigDC1b2XZ2w =m+7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig99386433D00C3627F777FB05-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 11:34:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3A21065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900DC8FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (f054096061.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.96.61]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKxQS-1KO9x21Frp-0001wp; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:34:40 +0200 Message-ID: <489051CB.9010808@janh.de> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:34:35 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+S/sxUCV7ZiZ5P7tAF+yDXrVN4Hcn+b/UK8am aefiMoUzK5mbZfamtWdoV/1h9o/2lV/s3BpcPJMjQgo7qLvPox RmeJBwX2U5haButLVYNGA== Subject: New harddisk: "CANNOT READ BLK" Cause? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:34:43 -0000 I got a new harddisk for my laptop, attached it via firewire, used "dump 0aLf - / | restore xf -" (from the FAQ), and swapped it with my internal one. During that, I also migrated /var and /usr to separate bsdlabels. On reboot during fsck (ad0s1f), I got: CANNOT READ BLK: 251403296 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 251403296, 251403297, 251403298, 251403299, LOOK FOR ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCKS? yes 32 is not a file system superblock SEARCH FOR ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK FAILED. YOU MUST USE THE Is there a problem with the harddisk? Did I do anything wrong? How do I find out? Since I never used bsdlabel and newfs by hand before for more than trivial cases, I might very well have messed something up. Here is what I came up with. Since I forgot to change it before swapping harddisks, I came up with this simple fstab: /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 1 2 /dev/ad0s1f /usr ufs rw 1 2 This is my bsdlabel for ad0s1: # /dev/ad0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2097152 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 b: 4194304 2097168 swap c: 314568702 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit e: 16777216 6291472 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 251658240 23068688 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 33554432 274726928 unused 0 0 h: 6287342 308281360 unused 0 0 This is the fdisk partition ad0s1: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 314568702 (153597 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 124/ head 254/ sector 63 Anything else? (I could probably recall most of the commands I issued.) Thanks in advance for any help, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:08:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA34106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1095C8FC14 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KOATk-0002je-60 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:28 +0000 Received: from pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net ([138.88.93.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:28 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:28 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:10:10 -0400 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <489051CB.9010808@janh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: New harddisk: "CANNOT READ BLK" Cause? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:29 -0000 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > I got a new harddisk for my laptop, attached it via firewire, used "dump > 0aLf - / | restore xf -" (from the FAQ), and swapped it with my internal > one. During that, I also migrated /var and /usr to separate bsdlabels. > > On reboot during fsck (ad0s1f), I got: > > CANNOT READ BLK: 251403296 > CONTINUE? [yn] y > > THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 251403296, 251403297, > 251403298, 251403299, Whenever I see messages like this I tend to wonder: "defective"? > LOOK FOR ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCKS? yes > > 32 is not a file system superblock > SEARCH FOR ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK FAILED. YOU MUST USE THE > > Is there a problem with the harddisk? Did I do anything wrong? How do I > find out? > [snip] I'm going to assume here that you still have the old HD and it is set aside out of the way and is OK as a backup. Me, what I think I'd do is leave the new drive installed, wipe it clean, and try a fresh install from CDROM. Reboot and look for these errors. If they magically are no longer present I'd suspect something went wrong using the Firewire port on the first go around. If you see them again I'd suspect the drive may be faulty with bad media spots and would be a candidate for RMA replacement. There may be a disk diagnostic available which can confirm bad media. Eliminate the hardware as faulty first, just to get it out of the way. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:14:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCEF1065688 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewlylegould@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2538FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewlylegould@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so762004ana.13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:14:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=0mDq0kI6n6Z61Bv218ino6EJ6MWI9FZHFjLno61fLk4=; b=Lr3phYxFQZiBbQiqNq0UhMBJhH9crXgFiE58TRVWuqWF2IArI8exLf2kQuG9UaHpfT qGIkyK9rMcVHoPjwf+lY9VTohUTTZ9A3RX5jiWG1RFgouu7+zxX6FF8j1xjbzC5XPf4E zB7C+t72nvHJqHYrVthEJkGDzyzdeS3Ix4bXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=oZr/5qNprKtSAn5D+9v43Ox3dXkjmGbdayo+RdPkKQaNJvjXFns8g1cRRcE8ZLM4IL GeuTuOpZMTDwXu37CLZ1/+NyDo8dMwUmHSP+AP2NeF4UV06at3lUtDty2+piq5XMSt4h /rNig1E/udRMLacXGydmwNz4InBd5Czte9nZY= Received: by 10.100.240.17 with SMTP id n17mr12557386anh.49.1217420076851; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.125.13 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:14:36 -0500 From: "Andrew Gould" To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: OT: encrypted email using web based application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:14:38 -0000 If I start with Subject line with the word "secure" using my work's email system, the email is sent to a secure, web based application where the recipients can view the message securely. The recipients receive a message that a secure email message is waiting for them there. They have to create an account based upon their email address to view the message. They do not have to recreate the accounts for future messages. This system is easy to use; and we don't have to worry about whether the recipients have PGP or GPG. Is there an open source application that does this? Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:19:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6251065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282D68FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so540539fkk.11 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=wtRcwmmQxefELiRdGzx7czJA9t3TWtI0lxb8dRt/9HE=; b=ClpGIZ88Dao6gmMIN2au7ajT2coxDYEUjP/Pr1pGIMGdHneuFb6vQ0I5otLvDyrvwe EhXob+BDitd0mj3enJyAxE7JOHDTzfZt1J+zfnIgJIaGx78UHy3CURObCh9hngIjDCYB swVYhy0bOKxypZwGqTdI8zVxo3c+KGwuZLEcY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=xm3k+U3WiwhWCcuc/+UmutRQANsXwvVdajcYH3HnhSZTv+iIWBB2qMSAmxMHNW85Ey 0XRJH2We+I7xI65MxZjm5eJ3P6xmFTigYqvpyW63JC8OXyzPTwh0qAMqn/hh69PnfKdC ywacdJB7G9Sv+z8EFW1Dnw77rRmYiwYGHDkiQ= Received: by 10.187.174.16 with SMTP id b16mr152697fap.104.1217418651023; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:50:50 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:19:35 -0000 I'm wondering why is it that no matter what I do, I can't seem to make my laptop emit sound lounder than a whisper. The laptop is an ECS Elitegroup W330 (Arima W330-UCX) and this is the website of the laptop: http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=145 I thought at first there was no sound coming out at all, so what I did was I plugged an external speaker to it and maxed out the volume via the volume knob and set my mixer settings all to 100, then I was able to hear sound from the speaker, but it's too weak to be of any good use. The following is my configuration: $ cat /boot/loader.conf | grep snd_ snd_ich_load="YES" $ kldstat | grep snd_ 3 1 0xc0d30000 6f88 snd_ich.ko $ kldstat | grep sound 4 2 0xc0d37000 4a5ac sound.ko $ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep pcm pcm0: port 0x5000-0x50ff,0x48c0-0x48ff mem 0xb0040800-0xb00409ff,0xb0040400-0xb00404ff irq 20 at device 30.2 on pci0 pcm0: [ITHREAD] pcm0: $ cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2007061600/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0xb0040800, 0xb0040400 irq 20 bufsz 16384 kld snd_ich [MPSAFE] (1p:1v/1r:1v channels duplex default) $ mixer Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 Mixer line is currently set to 100:100 Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 Mixer cd is currently set to 100:100 Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 Mixer igain is currently set to 100:100 Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 Mixer line1 is currently set to 100:100 Mixer phin is currently set to 100:100 Mixer phout is currently set to 100:100 Recording source: mic I tried audacious, xmms, and mpg123 but I still get the same behaviour. What's causing this? Can anybody give pointers why is this happening? Thanks. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:37:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F116D106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB08FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:37:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so548977fkk.11 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LNTfEMAXM2Ljy5s5nUzzhjjkqzIj+1whrTllFoa4B9k=; b=VK6uN0A1+gNoX1bdXXQvzwsveYROGmtY8oOIEU7R4H3c0lwctOmDQhEBZvRzO9RxJ5 oIJ87JTQcHUU7WcAaZQqp8v3D+vh1Br7qPicWSMq5YW0U+MC1j7OTCJnYkynd91symDQ fnljSGB++yGVXPNvhdIAqx7v5Htxo6u9ueRUY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=siK3udGwoyTwlzDCJzaVxEqG9xoQZ4roNSfqH6j11Ikyv8XjeuCjyM8zCI6vBATX+3 NIE75Be4Ioxond6f0T3Wr+iVSkQvHR4kgKM9xVTmsxlEg9OVxT+VwUF3hbcy4ry6fsbB dwytj6x8X4h3GB/DXaGHdnp7IUTz3e3qWH1/U= Received: by 10.187.249.5 with SMTP id b5mr151282fas.71.1217421420100; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807300537k4469b64cs64fca56b4310600c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:37:00 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <006901c8f240$045f91e0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <006901c8f240$045f91e0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> Cc: Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:37:02 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Marc Coyles wrote: > Take it you've checked hardware volume control on the laptop (ie: Function > Key and whichever key has volume-up logo on it)? That'll override anything > determined at software level... > > Marc A Coyles > Horbury School ICT Support Team (ext 730) > Mbl: 07850 518106 Done that. It's set to max afaik. Still the same weak sound. :-( > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rommel Martinez > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:51 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Very very weak sound from the speaker > > I'm wondering why is it that no matter what I do, I can't seem to make > my laptop emit sound lounder than a whisper. The laptop is an ECS > Elitegroup W330 (Arima W330-UCX) and this is the website of the > laptop: http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=145 > > I thought at first there was no sound coming out at all, so what I did was I > plugged an external speaker to it and maxed out the volume via the > volume knob and set my mixer settings all to 100, then I was able to > hear sound from the speaker, but it's too weak to be of any good use. > > The following is my configuration: > > $ cat /boot/loader.conf | grep snd_ > snd_ich_load="YES" > > $ kldstat | grep snd_ > 3 1 0xc0d30000 6f88 snd_ich.ko > > $ kldstat | grep sound > 4 2 0xc0d37000 4a5ac sound.ko > > $ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep pcm > pcm0: port 0x5000-0x50ff,0x48c0-0x48ff mem > 0xb0040800-0xb00409ff,0xb0040400-0xb00404ff irq 20 at device 30.2 on > pci0 > pcm0: [ITHREAD] > pcm0: > > $ cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2007061600/i386) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0xb0040800, 0xb0040400 irq 20 bufsz > 16384 kld snd_ich [MPSAFE] (1p:1v/1r:1v channels duplex default) > > $ mixer > Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer line is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer cd is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer igain is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer line1 is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer phin is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer phout is currently set to 100:100 > Recording source: mic > > I tried audacious, xmms, and mpg123 but I still get > the same behaviour. > > What's causing this? Can anybody give pointers why > is this happening? > > Thanks. > > -- > Rommel M. Martinez > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:53:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803D2106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0714D8FC64 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e34so160025qbe.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:52:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=WT48WCMld5xzTrxtfq4+avp755mvF3GNsQrLpkqvJWU=; b=YdgYzhVVe9/t/Lu8K6I7074Phro/0hgyiWQ2WKnWaDnP0RHVWFqcKCiOsKUc8xsftn G5gTXpnVxPcF4J33bv5s2h5TtwMupkOEMhHBdRiAhu89QFfI20QjNKY1H1ZrqxSTOZZJ YLhaaHnHdeagEws+Sin6gPKp1Z8we4YQwrwCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rVI2r9BcAkJfD603RAjPYNo6T9h8T5k0lPY62NmfLpy9j5NnsPAhcKSK3qR8j8qiSb iRmHvS1UnLil7FJ77goXA3RQr5Wbq7/Hcwsq8y9RiOz0DPAbJJhQfHNFwZs4H+GPIzrD oDs6Z4fF2vodlVj+fm0loAEHPi+brYOpAB6nk= Received: by 10.141.84.17 with SMTP id m17mr4195402rvl.48.1217422378531; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.90.11 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:52:58 -0400 From: "Andy Christianson" To: "Ruben de Groot" In-Reply-To: <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:00 -0000 Sendmail is running & DNS is working. See the following output: [root@fbsd /home/andy]# /etc/rc.d/sendmail status sendmail_submit is running as pid 71703. sendmail_clientmqueue is running as pid 675. [root@fbsd /home/andy]# ping gmail.com PING gmail.com (64.233.161.83): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=0 ttl=239 time=19.943 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.096 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.568 ms 64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=19.368 ms ^C --- gmail.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 19.368/20.994/22.568/1.364 ms [root@fbsd /home/andy]# mail andy.christianson.2@gmail.com Subject: Test This is a test!! EOT [root@fbsd /home/andy]# exit exit [andy@fbsd ~]$ mail andy.christianson.2@gmail.com Subject: Another test!! Test sent from a normal user EOT [andy@fbsd ~]$ /home/andy/dead.letter... Saved message in /home/andy/dead.letter On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Ruben de Groot wrote: > > Check if sendmail is running and your DNS is working. > > regards, > Ruben > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:26:50PM -0400, Andy Christianson typed: > > Whenever I send any email from my normal user account, it goes straight > to > > dead.letter, even if I attempt to mail a local user. When I try to send > mail > > as root, it simply does not send. I have a very basic, updated FreeBSD > 7.0 > > installation. Mail has not worked since I installed 7.0 about 42 days > ago. I > > am able to ping internet addresses as well as well as resolve domain > names. > > > > At the very least, can someone point me in the correct direction to start > > debugging this? I have read relevant sections in the FreeBSD handbook as > > well as sendmail manpages, etc. > > > > Thanks in advance for any help! > > > > -Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:56:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B59106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from ghirai.com (ghirai.com [193.33.187.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC51D8FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from deimos.bsd.nix (unknown [89.123.42.206]) by ghirai.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DD4E16F1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:56:00 +0100 (BST) Content-Disposition: inline From: Ghirai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:55:59 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200807301556.00007.ghirai@ghirai.com> Subject: py-qt install error (repost) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:56:02 -0000 Hello list, I'm running 7.0-RELEASE, i386, and KDE 3.5.8 from ports. Trying to install /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt gives this error: ... -- Creating pyqtconfig.py... /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qt/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtcanvas/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = ++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtnetwork/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qttable/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtxml/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtui/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtsql/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtext/Makefile /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX = c++|' -e 's|LINK = c++|LINK = c++|' /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtgl/Makefile sed: /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt/work/PyQt-x11-gpl-3.17.4/qtgl/Makefile: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt. *** Error code 1 Any ideas? Ports tree is up to date. If i disable OpenGL support in make config, it gets past that error, but hangs sucking up CPU here: ===> Building for py25-qt-3.17.4_1,2 c++ -c -pipe -fPIC -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -W -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.5 -I/usr/local/share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ -o sipqtcmodule.o sipqtcmodule.cpp Thanks. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:06:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5881065671 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7E98FC1C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vardyh@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so2532pyb.10 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2IqpLCJh+kylKeErIAgi/lvU6cERPA0092pqLijpyZU=; b=K2/92eVt15IGbNL3KilLaeW7XyUn58u1TvxUCjfJFP/QIRSklJN21P3c3NItIzfw6R QAGWMkyft22b4Ktc9GIQfqhL0KDX+Bf/1fR0Ws0u3ZR1hBTBs8M0+oQqctPD6H74Qy0O 6xObf6YLd63g0mfMwOvbWIUbaSlS3lAldgjzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UmFp0m12cB5hXrxtkyBdoeVErdC4BZ2M5qthcgxX+rHYWQVRoqC8ipfOBNHobn8QAz nQeJBAhHnp7DZPB2S6fGZ3v0+6lcn9303+paC5BWOvu9G8qWdYJnoOcXL+ttNrdyuNSC We4nuetRiCOhY4XYakSnH6vlvD44s6yJdx/8A= Received: by 10.141.71.14 with SMTP id y14mr4201043rvk.253.1217423169388; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [221.223.109.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k41sm1496996rvb.3.2008.07.30.06.06.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4890673D.3060404@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:06:05 +0800 From: vardyh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <488DC689.2090102@gmail.com> <488DFE85.4030504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <488ED323.9050303@gmail.com> <48904E36.1000706@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <48904E36.1000706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: No controller detected when boot FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:06:11 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > vardyh wrote: >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> vardyh wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> I'm a newbie to FreeBSD. I added >>>> 'console="comconsole"' >>>> to /boot/loader.conf and I got >>>> 'hptrr: no controller detected.' >>>> on the next boot. I didn't change anything else except for the >>>> 'console=xxx'. >>>> And I had had no problem before that. Could anyone tell me why? >>>> I will very appreciate for your help :> > >>> This is just the driver for the HighPoint Rocket Raid controller being >>> a bit too verbose. It's detected that you don't have anything >>> compatible >>> with hptrr(4) and (unlike the usual behaviour of most Raid Controller >>> drivers (or drivers for any sort of hardware really)) it considers >>> this fact to be of such vital importance that it really had to print >>> out >>> something on the console. Needless to say such behaviour has >>> already been quashed in 7-STABLE and will not appear in 7.1-RELEASE. >>> >>> In other words, it's harmless and you can just ignore it. I suspect >>> that this output wasn't actually triggered by your changing >>> the console setting -- there's no conceivable way changing one should >>> affect the other -- but that changing the way the boot messages are >>> displayed has managed to draw your attention to it. You probably had >>> it before but never noticed. > >> But, actually it claimed that no controller detected and asked me to >> specify the root filesystem manually, which wrote: >> >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >> Manul root filesystem specification: >> : Mount using filesystem >> eg. ufs:da0s1a >> ? List valid disk boot devices >> Abort manual input >> >> I tried ufs:/dev/ad0s1a, which was the real root filesystem registered >> in my /etc/fstab, but it still could not be mounted. And the same >> direction came out again to asked me to point out the root fs. >> >> I tried '?' also, but it seems that no disk devices were found... The >> kernel told me "List of GEOM managed disk devices:", and nothing but the >> same old direction followed. > > Ah. This is a different problem, unrelated to the 'no controller > detected' message. Unless you actually /do/ have a controller driven > by hptrr(4)? > > Basically your problem is that /dev/ad0 has disappeared -- and as that's > where the boot code expected to mount the root filesystem from, it > threw a big spanner in the works. > > Now, ad0 can disappear for a number of reasons: > > * the disk has died > > * the disk was unplugged and then not plugged back in again > properly > > * the disk was plugged into a different connector internally > (it could appear as one of ad1, ad2 or ad3 in this case) > > * you changed some BIOS settings and now the system is presenting > the disk as a SATA device (it could appear as ad4 or ad6 in > this case) > > * you changed some BIOS settings and now the system has tried to > generate some sort of RAID from the attached drives -- this could > appear as ar0, or it could prevent FreeBSD seeing the drive(s) at > all or it could have just shredded the contents of your disk and > left you up a gum tree. (Normally you would have had to click > through several dire warning messages in the last case, so this > eventuality shouldn't have been particularly surprising to you) > > Check all the connectors. Check the disk is properly seated, especially > if it's a hotswap device. Try booting up the installation media or a > Freesbie disk or any sort of LiveCD and see what hardware the kernel > discovers at boot time. If you have been changing BIOS settings, try > changing them back to what they were originally. > Cheers, > > Matthew > But it's weird that I didn't change any of the mentioned above. After I removed the 'console=Xxx' from loader.conf, it booted successfully. It seemed that the console option was the only matter. But I can't figure out how THAT option affected the adN device when booting up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:15:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214731065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from bene2.itea.ntnu.no (bene2.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683DA8FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FBF90003 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by bene2.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 76B1E90001 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 76992 invoked by uid 88); 30 Jul 2008 15:14:44 +0200 Received: from maren.math.ntnu.no (HELO weld.ej2.thelosingend.net) (129.241.211.48) by maren.thelosingend.net (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:14:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4890694A.9030607@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:14:50 +0200 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080315) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Gould References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=9198BB40; url=mailto:pgpkey@svein.halvorsen.cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bene2.itea.ntnu.no Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: OT: encrypted email using web based application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:15:04 -0000 Andrew Gould wrote: > If I start with Subject line with the word "secure" using my work's email > system, the email is sent to a secure, web based application where the > recipients can view the message securely. The recipients receive a message > that a secure email message is waiting for them there. They have to create > an account based upon their email address to view the message. They do not > have to recreate the accounts for future messages. > > This system is easy to use; and we don't have to worry about whether the > recipients have PGP or GPG. Is there an open source application that does > this? How is this secure? Ok, I can see that if the message is served over https, then the network packages themselves cannot be sniffed easily. But as long as the recipient did not give you the key to use, then this is not secure. Why should the recipient trust the server? Whether there is an open source solution, I don't know however. sv. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:23:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F67C1065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F758FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so6198ywe.13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:23:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sg/FYbcc28OdwO59aSk4v3w5uCrCFfVaUt1vIKQ5KNw=; b=MnmiBOWTX04EQEYweJpoIfSMCHsJmRzjuaqePPVyHyU4fZN8zi2SuaoEGgMjTG1zsu I8Ao9RNWAk5fAS2HZEIg+IF3iZlF1bVKoVwczp54ZckkbjbIkmMyy1aYXNuW0rpRdJyp 0EoBbl2dXn2WHLMyAcMlBMbY0Ei6nE+HBFpUM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wd35WVgPfvy0gzRQY2UE86Otv2ZXUEtkanFFSSOLlrzSAksDdoGndNrDMZIsvCK5m5 gT+HxsUQ2S3pUnT28isMRO1vQefbW1WCwbx2nEkgtrzy+XulWVt1uE3QL/j7Lx8D0Dbz X5+gT79eaEvnc02D5FCzgsImiMjVzh2zDBZT0= Received: by 10.114.38.2 with SMTP id l2mr8377042wal.200.1217422606704; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [203.206.184.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m27sm2044842wag.55.2008.07.30.05.56.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:56:41 +1000 From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:23:06 -0000 Hi all, I am fighting the following hardware: MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on the channels to 160mb. If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see ahd0 in fdisk. There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to and I only have da0 or da1. Thanks for your time // From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:32:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC95E106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46FF8FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4T008SNMQI6ZZ2@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:27:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <391934950807300537k4469b64cs64fca56b4310600c@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080730092753.01baecb4@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <006901c8f240$045f91e0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> <391934950807300537k4469b64cs64fca56b4310600c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:53 -0000 On my thinkpad the sound controls are connected to acpi_ibm and the volume level can be seen with 'sysctl -a |grep volume' and controlled with 'sysctl dev.acpi_ibm.0.volume=SOME_VALUE' or the volume keys. Perhaps you need to load the acpi modules for your laptop. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:35:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49361065671 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3B88FC1C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4T00CP0N2V7XAA@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:35:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:35:19 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080730093519.6d69dfa5@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:35:46 -0000 >HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI That system looks like you have only SCSI disks. These are listed as da0 and da1. Is the installer having trouble accessing the disks? I'm not sure I see the error. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:36:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93127106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAF38FC25 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so13096wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZbYmpJzezaP6z8xPenB0O0394W2X5AMWRu65AGJLw88=; b=i10GYIDyadKaClyS+MX/VpyZ74x4rk1ruT8DDECTEkLO6anuyiBoH93Er6TDCm4wuD WyOAI1MfQoxkOxfipnuewHXoZqF2vwMIhTY/RXYJ3o0TeZnH75VKeAyH2aTpLM83BraM sAp2xzStSI7gnY1tzr79L3KxZ7ubrY609TZvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Bth33O7ib5oUzZ73SvgRSR25uQe6DwyxD2Y4u6G9Vnf5ik/DDl7QdZpWwi4aObkfIo lrYPbih9KPYIhAtfUWW7vuFyGHvLs0gQ1BBOlu68Epgs5wbYyJK5CR01JIabAv4aaYbe Udf1DxSd5EXcGtSvt3+XAtuDgDt6o8p2EqJT8= Received: by 10.142.58.5 with SMTP id g5mr2659839wfa.224.1217423343870; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.174.7 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:09:03 +0200 From: usleepless@gmail.com To: glarkin@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <488E2753.5020002@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3A85D7EF44E1C744BF6434691F5659E9703639@www.fcimail.org> <488E2753.5020002@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jean-Paul Natola , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: OT: Custmoize VNC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:36:48 -0000 On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > | I know there are two apps (open source) that will allow you to > customize vnc > | but I just cant remember, in essence I want the remote users (outside the > | lan) to be able to download the file click run and it will automatically, > | upon launch connect to the viewer here at HQ (ip add encryption port # > etc..) > | > | I was looking at this a few weeks ago and like a fool I didn't > bookmark the > | page, any help would be appreciated google: - Ultra VNC SC ( free as in beer ) - Helpdesk VNC ( commercial ) regards, usleepless From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 13:52:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E728106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E258FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KOC65-0007Yy-6P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:09 +0000 Received: from pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net ([138.88.93.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:09 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:53:51 -0400 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-138-88-93-174.res.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:52:11 -0000 ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > > I am fighting the following hardware: > > MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) > Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 > SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) > HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) > > Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a > standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on > the channels to 160mb. > > If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. > > > I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm > doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there > are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see > ahd0 in fdisk. > [snip] Sounds like you might be able to see the individual drives which may indicate termination and other stuff is OK. During boot (POST time before OS starts to load) you press CTRL-A (both keys together) to get into the Adaptec card BIOS. You can configure your drives as an array here. There is supposed to be a message on the screen but this message can be disabled by BOFH. Been a while since I've done this, but IIRC after creating the array and rebooting you would then install to ar0. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:13:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FD51065671 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dm-lists@meisternet.ch) Received: from mercury.meisternet.ch (mercury.meisternet.ch [62.65.147.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE928FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dm-lists@meisternet.ch) Received: by mercury.meisternet.ch (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 85583B82B; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:50:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:50:59 +0200 From: Dominik Meister To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080730135059.GA21564@mercury.meisternet.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: nico-freebsd-btxhalt2008@schottelius.org Subject: BTX halted on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:13:20 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi We are experiencing a problem with one of our FreBSD 6.2 machines. The machine has been running fine for months until we had to reboot it. Now it doesn't boot anymore. After the boot loader we get what looks like a register dump: FreeBSD/i386 boot Default: 0:ad(0,a)heap boot: /boot/kernel/kernel\ int=3D0000000e err=3D00000002 efl=3D00010086 eip=3Dc042426a eax=3Dc06da7a8 ebx=3Dc06da7a0 ecx=3D00000000 edx=3Df000ff53 esi=3D00000000 edi=3Dc06da57f ebp=3Dc08f6d4c esp=3Dc08f6d40 cs=3D0008 ds=3D0010 es=3D0010 fs=3D0010 gs=3D0010 ss=3D0010 cs:eip=3D89 42 0c eb 07 90 8d 43-08 89 46 14 89 5e 10 8d 46 10 89 43 0c 8b 47 0c-89 43 10 85 c0 74 0b 8b ss:esp=3D7f a5 6d c0 00 00 8f 00-00 e0 8f 00 64 6d 8f c0 75 3b 42 c0 a0 a7 6d c0-7f a5 6d c0 20 a5 6d c0 BTX halted and the machine reboots. Any suggestions what might be the problem? All I can find about "BTX halted" references to problems when installing a fresh system and not out of a sudden on machine which has been running fine before. Any hints are highly appreciated. Thanks, Dominik --=20 Dominik Meister My public GnuPG key is available at http://www.meisternet.ch/gpg.txt --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQccMACgkQVD1CCgD/XK3FZQCfboG0Hhtx9vCfJdnbmLUndvDN Ti4An2AjiQZExq1+gHOmqiByamDk8I56 =fjML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:20:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3362106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EC88FC1B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6UEKBpj028886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:18 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UEKAsv050699; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6UEK9rm050698; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> <489013b9.Pt7+7kznBXs3SSP+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:08 +0300 In-Reply-To: <489013b9.Pt7+7kznBXs3SSP+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> (perryh@pluto.rain.com's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:09:45 -0700") Message-ID: <874p67xxlz.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6UEKBpj028886 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.718, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.32, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:20:31 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:09:45 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>>> Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer to >>>> use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that the peer >>>> will never try to send a packet larger than that? >>>> >>>> I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In case >>>> it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and I've been >>>> unable to find a way to limit its packet size directly. >>> >>> Setting the interface MTU should do it, i.e.: >>> >>> ifconfig re0 mtu 640 >>> >>> Not all interfaces support setting the MTU and some may have range >>> restrictions though. >> >> In particular, this seems to work with my wlan0 interface, but not >> with my re0 interface ... > > That's certainly simple enough, and xl0 apparently supports the > reduced mtu setting. It seems to be working just fine. Thanks! > > I'd thought of trying to set the sun's MTU, but hadn't been able > to find a way to do it. It had never occurred to me that setting > the *recipient's* MTU would limit the *sender's* packet size. You can edit `/etc/hostname.foo0' in the Sun too, and add something like: 192.168.1.10/24 mtu 640 but since now you are happy with the new setup, that's fine :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:22:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0F91065679 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk) Received: from smtp2-wak.yhgfl.net (smtp2-wak-ext.yhgfl.net [89.207.208.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A428FC26 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk) Received: from horbury.wakefield.sch.uk ([10.126.96.34]) by smtp2-wak.yhgfl.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6UELuGh017353 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:57 +0100 Received: from ITTEAM02 [10.126.96.253] by horbury.wakefield.sch.uk with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id A8FF92900B6; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:51 +0100 From: "Marc Coyles" To: , Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:48 +0100 Message-ID: <007e01c8f24f$9a905eb0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <003401c8ed77$bd5ae140$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Importance: Normal X-YHGfL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the YHGfL Foundation for more information X-YHGfL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-YHGfL-MailScanner-MCPCheck: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 0.5) X-YHGfL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk Cc: Subject: RE: Upgrade 6.2-Release to 7.0-Release - stuck! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:10 -0000 Righty - now that I'm back from my wanderings I've managed to complete the upgrade from 6.3 to 7.0-RELEASE, but am still getting issues with named not starting. For reference, I pulled down a clean 7.0-R version of named.conf and dropped it in as /etc/named.conf /var/log/messages shows the following (lots): Jul 30 14:39:53 bigsis root: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/local/sbin/named Weird thing? Course it can't run /usr/local/sbin/named as it ain't there - it's at /usr/sbin/named, BUT, /etc/rc.d/named has the location correct so I'm not sure where anything is getting reference to /usr/local/sbin... Marc A Coyles ICT Support Team (ext 730) Mbl: 07850 518106 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 14:22:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1B0106567E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBA308FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 22179 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 14:22:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.151.114) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 30 Jul 2008 14:22:37 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A9A2317063; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:22:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:22:36 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: DSA - JCR Message-ID: <20080730142236.GB11244@ozzmosis.com> References: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:22:40 -0000 On Wed 2008-07-30 09:31:13 UTC-0000, DSA - JCR (juancr@dsa.es) wrote: > I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to > split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also > save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. > > I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) You are probably describing sysutils/screen, although recently I've switched to misc/tmux, which works in a similar way. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:03:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CACA106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mailout.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8EF8FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from guardian.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E420F48812 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:03:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by guardian.shadypond.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F09BF1D9 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:00 +0000 References: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> <20080730142236.GB11244@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <20080730142236.GB11244@ozzmosis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807301503.02327.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:03:18 -0000 On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:22:36 andrew clarke wrote: > On Wed 2008-07-30 09:31:13 UTC-0000, DSA - JCR (juancr@dsa.es) wrote: > > I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to > > split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also > > save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. > > > > I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) > > You are probably describing sysutils/screen, although recently I've > switched to misc/tmux, which works in a similar way. Either that one or 'splitvt' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:04:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13EF1065682 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0F58FC2C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 818D1142034; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:04:48 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from iris.teledomenet.local (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A597114218F; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:04:16 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: "Alexandre Biancalana" , questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:06:03 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> <200807301239.59573.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <8e10486b0807300656j54a6fb31p65add890fd00bc8c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807300656j54a6fb31p65add890fd00bc8c@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807301806.04141.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:49 -0000 On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:56:23 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > On 7/30/08, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:51:52 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > > Hi list, (I already ask this on -net, but I get no answers) > > > > > > I have two 100Mbit link (L2L, lan to lan) between the company and > > > our datacenter, on each side I have two redudant (pf+carp) > > > firewalls. > > > > > > I configured one vlan for each 100Mbit link and used carp to do > > > the failover between machines on each side, the vlan interfaces are > > > configured without ip address (with Max's > > > carpdev patch), only carp interfaces have ips. > > > > > > I want to use OpenOSPFD to distribute our internal routes and do > > > automatic failover+loadbalance of this two 100Mbit links. > > > > > > This work ? Someone have a similar setup ? Any hints ? > > > > I think using OSPF and CARP on the same interface could have > > unexpected results. > > I see some examples You get to have two ways to forward packet to a destination. One via CARP and one via OSPF. I think it's a possible source of errors. > > > I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy > > and load balancing. Do you have to use OSPF? > > That is, is there an OSPF domain in which you have to be part of? > > I use CARP for firewall redundancy on each side. I want to use OSPF to > easy distribute routes on my networks, the failover and load balance > of the links are a desirable plus. So, there is an OSPF domain besides the four FreeBSD firewalls, right? Could you provide your network's topology? Is it something like: LAN1----CLUSTER1====CLUSTER2----LAN2 where: CLUSTER1 = CARP(FW1, FW2) CLUSTER2 = CARP(FW3, FW4) ??? For example, in the above diagram you cannot load balance the traffic, it will always go through the same routers: FW1 and FW3 or FW1 and FW4 or FW2 and FW3 or FW2 and FW4. It will of course failover in case of a FW failure. > I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy > and load balancing. So, my suggestion above is false, at least with the current CARP on FreeBSD. Please supply more info about your setup, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:12:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723601065670; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52EA8FC12; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.232.87]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UFE3SB063024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:14:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UFCfPN087119; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:12:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:12:39 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, barner@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: valgrind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:12:50 -0000 ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/valgrind: is only for i386, while you are running amd64 ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - devel/valgrind Same holds for valgrind-snapshot. On it's website I see it supports AMD64 on Linux, so I guess this is a FreeBSD specific problem. Is there ongoing work to get this on amd64? Out of curiosity, what is the reason it does not work right now? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:24:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D57D106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B008FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from vincelaptemp.the.namesco.net (126.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m6UFOkw5061472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:24:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <489087C2.8070006@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:24:50 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk References: <007e01c8f24f$9a905eb0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> In-Reply-To: <007e01c8f24f$9a905eb0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade 6.2-Release to 7.0-Release - stuck! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:24:53 -0000 Marc Coyles wrote: > Righty - now that I'm back from my wanderings I've managed to complete the > upgrade from 6.3 to 7.0-RELEASE, but am still getting issues with named not > starting. For reference, I pulled down a clean 7.0-R version of named.conf > and dropped it in as /etc/named.conf > > /var/log/messages shows the following (lots): > > Jul 30 14:39:53 bigsis root: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: > run_rc_command: cannot run /usr/local/sbin/named > > Weird thing? Course it can't run /usr/local/sbin/named as it ain't there - > it's at /usr/sbin/named, BUT, /etc/rc.d/named has the location correct so > I'm not sure where anything is getting reference to /usr/local/sbin... > > Have you changed named_program in either /etc/rc.conf or /etc/defaults/rc.conf ? as a quick check, for file in /etc/rc.conf /etc/defaults/rc.conf ; do grep -H named_program $file ; done should return /etc/defaults/rc.conf:named_program="/usr/sbin/named" # path to named, if you want a different one. if you havent Vince > Marc A Coyles > ICT Support Team (ext 730) > Mbl: 07850 518106 > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 15:53:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F071065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA478FC18 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so106577rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=arFvFjW1PV/QvalOup9C9CvRQ9/KWyXIjm9nPRqUb0g=; b=MWftoUO6OmLICUlpO6jltz7Moxmwh8HjH6eBal9bA44HP3fBxyhmvDYaNzmLRkKXiO BUiw11Kw3eGECylG/avE0XIqXUw3k0MSVH4qpeiEbOKWWQuVKai1HQle226cyEMcH/KM cUwKnpWIqtY4q7shSWWNitsw2HiEeFhFIhCsk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=o2yVmRiecH1RM12rUPF1DEjFYu355UnSIixJtanhWtfS46oO2tNkUc5pgju5Omcs0I VWvZyO3kwATGA9lNSGh01Q92+0Jrrktq0mCxVstu3LKhrRr6Sgk5nUCmkuTE9M3bmtH1 CgHCu3jdgY3eV1iqdjUq9D+4QXN0YxrLAtToc= Received: by 10.141.50.11 with SMTP id c11mr4445347rvk.222.1217433201061; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.158.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:21 -0300 From: Agus To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Imposible to update/upgrade ports.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:53:21 -0000 Hi guys, I'v been delaying the installed ports upgrade cause i was testing my server and now that it it in production i wanted to upgrade them and find it impossible... I am running uname -a FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007 I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then installed portmanager and portsaudit.... did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, like sec, mysql and more.... Now while trying to update with portmanager sysutils/rsync -l -ui -f #Then also tried without the f get this errors: --------------------------------- portmanager 0.4.1_9 perl-5.8.8_1 /lang/perl5.8 make Strike 2 it gets like its looping while updating perl.... For what i saw, portmanager seems to try to update all dependencies too..and is failing in that.... Something similar happened while trying to update apache22 Its my first try updating/upgrading ports...and it was hard to find a doc explaining this....i mean..there are lots of docs but each with different methods... Well, hope you can give me a jhand.. Thanks and Cheers, Agus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:03:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3832D106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189058FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 16829 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 16:03:54 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2008 16:03:53 -0000 Message-ID: <489090C7.1010006@telenix.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:03:19 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <20080729005144.GA67405@thought.org> <11167f520807281913l2f8bf1a3r54ce401194e4c25a@mail.gmail.com> <488F2CAF.50703@telenix.org> <8f5897560807291127p44ad6222hbe2ada7b4ceaab0f@mail.gmail.com> <20080729202354.GA38403@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20080729202354.GA38403@thought.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Preston Hagar , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: whatkind of 19" LCD display?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gary Kline wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Preston Hagar wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> I really like the Dell, both because of their outstanding contrast and >>> brightness, no dead pixels in any of my LCDs, and the fact that they come with >>> multiple interfaces which are switch selectable from the front panel. The old >>> 20" units had 4 jacks (RCA, S-Video, VGA, and DVI). Really convenient. The new >>> 24" one, beyond being able to run native 1920X1080 for HiDef Video, it's got >>> about 10 different jacks. Looks it up the web, the Dell pages describe it best, >>> and the contrast on that 24" has to be seen to be believed. I actually turned >>> it down! >> I would second the Dell's, specifically the UltraSharp line. I have a >> 19" Ultrasharp as my primary monitor and a 19" Dell "Standard" as a >> secondary monitor. The Ultrasharp has DVI and VGA, a built in USB hub >> and is great to look at. > > > Thanks, Preston. > > So:: boiling it down to a make and a line, now Chuck [[ and you ]] > give thumbs-up on the Dell. "UltraSharp", rt? My first Dell was the 19: UltraSharp (I forget the name right now, but I'm quite certain it was an UltraSharp). I was really knocked out by the contrast/brightness, but even more by those front panel switchable interfaces, which let me easily connect up two computers to the same LCD, and just need to hit a button on the front to switch. Before I put the money down here, I really did read the reviews, and I felt they came up on top there, which made me feel like I couldn't walk away from that purchase as being a mark. I got the 19" models back in 2000, and about 2 months ago (I think?) I finally lost one. I replaced it with a 24" model from Dell because of my good experience with the earlier one, but also because the 24" 2408WFP came compatible with 1920X1080 HDTV, 8 different interfaces (two of the DVI interfaces alone!) and nicely done PIP. It cost me aboout $650 (this time I bought it direct from Dell, not going thru eBay) and the contrast really surprised me by being astonishingly better than the old 19" model (which I'd thought was already pretty decent). I really like this new one, and although I didn't buy it, it comes with an inexpensive addon, a soundbar, that integrates right in, and a really easily adjustable height desk mounting. I'm disabled, and I can adjust it easily, and it's stable. I dunno, you might possibly be able to beat the price. I kinda doubt you can beat the quality vs. price factor. I don't like it when I come back a month or two after a major purchase, wondering if I'd been a sucker, but after this purchase, I didn't feel that way. I think it's a good deal. > > A personal note from the cheapes--er, *thriftiest* guy alive: > for a new display, price isn' the driving force. it's quality-- > which includes durabiility, function, &c. (actually, i wouldn't > mind 19+.) 20" [[[ and when the hell are we going to join the 18th > Century and go-metric?! ]]] ....20" is about the max since i cram > as many xterms with tiny fonts as possible. so > brightness+contrast matter. [[ if i could get out easily, i > might check out the 24" ... but that would only give me LCD-envy!! > --ah, *life* :-| ]] > > > Anyhow, ao far, i'm looking at the Hanns-G, the Samsung SyncMaster > (941BW), And possobily the VIewSonic. And the Dell UltraSharp. > > (gReat if Costco has these; but i'll try egghead.com too.) > > Anybody here in the States have any other recommmendation, > plese gimmmee a shout:-) > > gary > > >> Preston >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiQkMcACgkQz62J6PPcoOmO4wCfYhWBfUgTCdscUu2ks3rwjAxP 7pAAoKTH3XoM0iLLJeXbu5Ccuu9xb59T =gYoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:04:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC01106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B398FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOEA1-00050f-2s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:04:21 -0700 Message-ID: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:04:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl Subject: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:04:24 -0000 I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as base. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18736784.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:20:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD511065682 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BE78FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UGKdL9008222; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m6UGKdL9008222 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217434840; bh=ZKdomuIjwH1hNW LAt0cinA+51gB5w+n8hMuFybofV5M=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<489094D0.5000709@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Wed,=2 030=20Jul=202008=2017:20:32=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Dominik=20Meister=20|CC:=20freebsd -questions@freebsd.org,=20=0D=0A=20nico-freebsd-btxhalt2008@schotte lius.org|Subject:=20Re:=20BTX=20halted=20on=20boot|References:=20<2 0080730135059.GA21564@mercury.meisternet.ch>|In-Reply-To:=20<200807 30135059.GA21564@mercury.meisternet.ch>|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95. 6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0 A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"- -----------enig712EC083C633B8833CC7E4F2"; b=gVHt0hu3RG8ofscxFlAKBnD ntudN91yVYf6/PFWmB21zS1wTlfWXDykTKAy1ON69ob73zxzN0Z9se/eecqilcYcl93 CEuQPC3m3MDA9q/+ojzbsvGefjH/CwJoxaKZ8d3OcsqdznsOpkv9qYdLtJTbY7qLeeh 5iENvf4R0FBCdU= Message-ID: <489094D0.5000709@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:32 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dominik Meister References: <20080730135059.GA21564@mercury.meisternet.ch> In-Reply-To: <20080730135059.GA21564@mercury.meisternet.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig712EC083C633B8833CC7E4F2" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:40 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7891/Wed Jul 30 11:03:53 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nico-freebsd-btxhalt2008@schottelius.org Subject: Re: BTX halted on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig712EC083C633B8833CC7E4F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dominik Meister wrote: > Hi >=20 > We are experiencing a problem with one of our FreBSD 6.2 machines. The > machine has been running fine for months until we had to reboot it. Now= > it doesn't boot anymore. After the boot loader we get what looks like a= > register dump: >=20 > FreeBSD/i386 boot > Default: 0:ad(0,a)heap > boot: /boot/kernel/kernel\ > int=3D0000000e err=3D00000002 efl=3D00010086 eip=3Dc042426a > eax=3Dc06da7a8 ebx=3Dc06da7a0 ecx=3D00000000 edx=3Df000ff53 > esi=3D00000000 edi=3Dc06da57f ebp=3Dc08f6d4c esp=3Dc08f6d40 > cs=3D0008 ds=3D0010 es=3D0010 fs=3D0010 gs=3D0010 ss=3D0010 > cs:eip=3D89 42 0c eb 07 90 8d 43-08 89 46 14 89 5e 10 8d > 46 10 89 43 0c 8b 47 0c-89 43 10 85 c0 74 0b 8b > ss:esp=3D7f a5 6d c0 00 00 8f 00-00 e0 8f 00 64 6d 8f c0 > 75 3b 42 c0 a0 a7 6d c0-7f a5 6d c0 20 a5 6d c0 > BTX halted >=20 > and the machine reboots. >=20 > Any suggestions what might be the problem? All I can find about "BTX > halted" references to problems when installing a fresh system and not > out of a sudden on machine which has been running fine before. >=20 > Any hints are highly appreciated. This is telling you that the boot loader has become corrupted, and is crashing. A leading cause for this would be hardware failure -- something gone wonky with your hard drive. Try booting the 'fixit' system from the installation media and see if you can fsck and access the filesystems on the disk -- it may be a localised problem that's killed the ability to boot from the drive leav= ing the rest unaffected. Or the entire drive may be toast, and you've got no option other than to get yourself a new drive and restore from backup. Actually, given the fairly cheap price of disks nowadays, I wouldn't try too hard to fix up the original disk: if you're going to=20 have to spend some hours working on it, it's more economic to ditch the old one and start afresh. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig712EC083C633B8833CC7E4F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiQlNcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyDLgCeM5dMyqOtq1iha5/FKyc6wfaZ PtkAnijq6nz07g84UzInZ8D33HRt46M/ =OQZL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig712EC083C633B8833CC7E4F2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:21:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1473106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557DD8FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UGLEIb063522; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:21:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1D578BA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:21:14 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Wyatt Neal Message-ID: <20080730162114.GA87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty building a cross-compiler with a fresh install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:21:16 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:47:42PM -0400, Wyatt Neal wrote: > greetings, >=20 > i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm > having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the > system. You don't say _what_ kind of cross-compiler you want. Use the available cross-compilers from ports. There is a good chance someone else has already sorted it out. You can find a complete list of cross-compilers with=20 'ls /usr/ports/devel/*-gcc/Makefile': /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/cross-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/djgpp-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/i386-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/i960-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/m68k-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/mingw32-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/mips-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/msp430-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/powerpc-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/powerpc-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/sh-rtems-gcc/Makefile /usr/ports/devel/sparc-rtems-gcc/Makefile Note that cross-gcc is a master port for most of the others except mingw32-gcc. If you want to cross-compile for win32, use mingw32-gcc. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQlPkACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUGiwCgi+VA1vUJj/le5x2vYE5sLIOX sZYAnAnhIUaaoWcgBWSAFwi+0wRxSQYc =E4x4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:22:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9251065675 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9DD8FC19; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:22:12 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Lach References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:22:14 -0000 Jakub Lach wrote: > I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as > base. I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by the GPLv3. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:27:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C7E1065676 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A6C8FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so68961wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.173.14 with SMTP id v14mr2771588wfe.315.1217433600788; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.158.15 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:00:00 -0300 From: "Joey Mingrone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:45 -0000 Hello, I've been told that LaTeX is probably the best solution for creating scientific papers with math fonts, so I'm trying to get a working installation. My first attempt was to install the latex2e-2003.12_1 port, which installed the tex-3.14159_3 port as a dependency. This seemed to work, but there were some things referenced in the documentation that seemed to be missing. For example, the amsmath package wasn't available. I thought there must be a port specifically for these fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being updated. Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul suggest a installation method that works well for them? Thanks, Joey Mingrone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:32:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FFC106567D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F628FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOEav-00062t-FB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:09 -0700 Message-ID: <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:10 -0000 Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: > > Jakub Lach wrote: >> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >> gcc43 as >> base. > > I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by > the GPLv3. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is going to be omitted? If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18737322.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:32:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2411065680 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335378FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so126945wra.27 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.96.15 with SMTP id t15mr11404890agb.8.1217435541416; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.233.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm2550761agb.22.2008.07.30.09.32.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:32:01 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080730123201.3219ed25@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Dr2gAlr+0bM=fOMuUS=4bfK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: Imposible to update/upgrade ports.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:22 -0000 --Sig_/Dr2gAlr+0bM=fOMuUS=4bfK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:21 -0300 Agus wrote: >Hi guys, > >I'v been delaying the installed ports upgrade cause i was testing my >server and now that it it in production i wanted to upgrade them and >find it impossible... > >I am running > uname -a >FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: >Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007 > >I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then >installed portmanager and portsaudit.... > >did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, like sec, mysql and >more.... > >Now while trying to update with > >portmanager sysutils/rsync -l -ui -f >#Then also tried without the f > >get this errors: >--------------------------------- > >portmanager 0.4.1_9 > > perl-5.8.8_1 /lang/perl5.8 > make Strike 2 > >it gets like its looping while updating perl.... >For what i saw, portmanager seems to try to update all dependencies >too..and is failing in that.... > >Something similar happened while trying to update apache22 > >Its my first try updating/upgrading ports...and it was hard to find a >doc explaining this....i mean..there are lots of docs but each with >different methods... > >Well, hope you can give me a jhand.. I use portmanager myself occasionally. They this: 1) Update your ports tree 2) Run: portmanager -u -l -y -p If it fails again, look in the log file (/var/log/portmanager.log) and see what it says. You can post the error message back here. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Convention is the ruler of all. Pindar --Sig_/Dr2gAlr+0bM=fOMuUS=4bfK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQl4kACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMk8agCfTyqzrYzcbaENbHNkgqjA7rtk +aAAn190C35m5eypPn11ZOyud7eoId+F =uctV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Dr2gAlr+0bM=fOMuUS=4bfK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:45:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E881065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wyattnealster@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AC88FC08 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wyattnealster@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so73029pyb.10 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/feuFeQA4Jy+emhsC995dlVPmIk0UbRiDK5rvjFaxUM=; b=ZtTR3cmof77JwOFBjCFpl2fqM7vO++Y9sCT5lpk84/qA/QhoilE9jz6n6QXDR5AbO6 duNjLq4zvgarvN8cghN4BEzWm0NzCI3AIdiT/cNqJofw01V4ffXuVmSyRFyDn/pzU08u 4S7PXy6w94pTElRlboRadmgWV3QTUMP+gjN/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CVx6Hdy5ccbvK8BNQWQhsZp7djKg7zTomAF+Xfa89ay8wUkyzZlGxwAX2TKMY957+X 9wkGdgnqSGEEfMPzT1rkyUce1dGA0GV4Zjf03F21ObmK4O4HHebu/Yspq5+/ZeysTNIe Br5M6Uy1zGaeQzTk+vkO46KroZZKf4FVbG9q8= Received: by 10.141.198.9 with SMTP id a9mr4526403rvq.108.1217436301495; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.226.6 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <437096a00807300945y22cad8a3pe20c59ce80fb9c55@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:45:01 -0400 From: "Wyatt Neal" To: "Roland Smith" In-Reply-To: <20080730162114.GA87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <437096a00807291747k4f524f78h148ecd88704060ad@mail.gmail.com> <20080730162114.GA87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difficulty building a cross-compiler with a fresh install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:45:03 -0000 the cross compiler i'm looking to build is one to produce i386 compatable system v elf executables for freebsd. the default gcc installed with freebsd 6.1 produces i386 compatible freebsd elf executables, not system v. i've also found that i'm apparently building gcc improperly and with the wrong version of binutils; however, changing the binutils to the correct version hasn't helped and i'm still waiting on gcc's build to get to/past the point where it's been crashing out. On 7/30/08, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:47:42PM -0400, Wyatt Neal wrote: > > greetings, > > > > i've been running with a freebsd 6.1 system for a few days and i'm > > having some oddities when trying to build a cross compiler on the > > system. > > You don't say _what_ kind of cross-compiler you want. > > Use the available cross-compilers from ports. There is a good chance > someone else has already sorted it out. > > You can find a complete list of cross-compilers with > 'ls /usr/ports/devel/*-gcc/Makefile': > > /usr/ports/devel/arm-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/avr-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/cross-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/djgpp-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/i386-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/i960-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/m68k-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/mingw32-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/mips-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/msp430-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/powerpc-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/powerpc-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/sh-rtems-gcc/Makefile > /usr/ports/devel/sparc-rtems-gcc/Makefile > > Note that cross-gcc is a master port for most of the others except > mingw32-gcc. If you want to cross-compile for win32, use mingw32-gcc. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:56:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC95B1065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5492C8FC23 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with SMTP id m6UGjxne019794 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:45:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:45:18 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080730184518.99a25681.dick@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-pc-solaris2.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:30 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:00:00 -0300 "Joey Mingrone" wrote: > Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul > suggest a installation method that works well for them? Install from the TeX Live CD and you get the latest software (FreeBSD support is included). -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D ++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxce snv94 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 16:56:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D11C106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EA88FC1B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UGupko014250; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:56:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 44D1EBA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:56:51 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: DSA - JCR Message-ID: <20080730165651.GC87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47376.217.114.136.134.1217410706.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: protecting my FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:56:56 -0000 --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:38:26AM -0000, DSA - JCR wrote: > HI all again >=20 > I would like to know if there is a method to know how well protected is my > system (FreeBSD 6.2) in order to not permit a user to enter as root. > I need it because I have intellectual propierty in that box, and I know > some people is interested on it. Note that nothing short of disk encryption can protect the machine if the attacker has physical access to it (e.g. he can steal the machine or the harddisk). Security is a never-ending road, not a destination.=20 - Keep the machine in a locked room/cupboard (restrict physical access). - Subscribe to the freebsd-announce mailing list to keep on top of security advisories.=20 - Keep you system patched/up-to-date in case vulnerabilities pop up in the kernel or d=E6mons that you use.=20 - Disable d=E6mons that you do not use. - Install a firewall that blocks by default. - Disable remote root logins. - Build a custom kernel & world that do not contain things that you do no use. See src.conf(5), e.g. WITHOUT_RCMDS. > I use inetd, and I have all ports disable except Samba because it is a > repository for Windows Docs in a network. (swap is not enable). You can use security/nmap to check if a system has open ports. > My root password is almost 20 chars with numbers, normal and capitals > letters, points. That's OK, as long as it isn't on a note near the machine. :-) > there is a user that belongs to operator with a script for (un)mounting > USB disk in which I trap almost all signals (about 15). Better to make that user member of a new group (e.g. usb) and (assuming that you're using umass(4)) give that group read/write rights on the da devices in /etc/devfs.rules: "add path 'da*' mode 0660 group usb" Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQnVMACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUe5ACeLyCtFhjpzRDogDBKZbD7KOWE VA4An0mV9rqLWtJ8qA+dLpL5+zhgOjy6 =k4OW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:02:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E584106568C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glyn@millingtons.org) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECDA8FC20 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glyn@millingtons.org) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,280,1215385200"; d="scan'208";a="16329236" Received: from unknown (HELO glynthebearded.millingtons.org) ([82.152.120.109]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2008 17:59:39 +0100 Received: by glynthebearded.millingtons.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9EEDB229D3; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100 (BST) To: "Joey Mingrone" References: Organization: Central Church, Torquay, U.K. X-Now-Playing: There's a deathly hush in the close tonight! X-Liturgical-Date: Optional Memorial: Saint Peter Chrysologus, bishop and doctor of the Church, A.D. 2008 From: Glyn Millington Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Joey Mingrone's message of "Wed\, 30 Jul 2008 13\:00\:00 -0300") Message-ID: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glyn@millingtons.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:02:49 -0000 "Joey Mingrone" writes: > I've been told that LaTeX is probably the best solution for creating > scientific papers with math fonts, so I'm trying to get a working > installation. A noble ambition! > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being > updated. Alas the news about teTeX is true. > Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul > suggest a installation method that works well for them? Have you had a look at TeXLive? http://www.tug.org/texlive/ For FreeBSD that means downloading the iso, mounting it like this mount_cd9660 -o ro /dev/`mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/file.iso` /mount-point cd to the mount point and look out for script entitled install-tl.sh the script pretty well takes you through the installation Good luck! atb Glyn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:07:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD346106567F for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9448FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UH6xg4024224; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:07:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 340D5BAAF; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:06:59 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <20080730170659.GD87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, barner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: valgrind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:06 -0000 --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >=20 > ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/valgrind: > is only for i386, while you are running amd64 > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > - devel/valgrind >=20 > Same holds for valgrind-snapshot. >=20 > On it's website I see it supports AMD64 on Linux, so I guess this is a=20 > FreeBSD specific problem. >=20 > Is there ongoing work to get this on amd64? >=20 > Out of curiosity, what is the reason it does not work right now? Read http://valgrind.org/info/platforms.html, especially 'Porting Plans'. Or remove the line 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3D i386' from the port Makefile, try it and see where it breaks. :-) I'm guessing it need some support code in the OS. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQn7MACgkQEnfvsMMhpyW9SQCdHS1zh/OcEBMxxWJDHxPqh+Lr duUAoKhkygSw62xXQCs4fhCrCp4D8rxg =H4GF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:07:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EA71065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (SNOWBALL.PCBI.upenn.edu [128.91.62.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABE08FC1E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6UGeW63007845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:40:32 -0400 Received: (from vmutu@localhost) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m6UGeW79007843 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:40:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:40:32 -0400 From: Valeriu Mutu To: FreeBSD-questions list Message-ID: <20080730164031.GA6262@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux Organization: Penn Center for Bioinformatics Subject: Problem building openssh-portable with KERBEROS, GSSAPI, KERB_GSSAPI. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:07:34 -0000 Hi all, I am trying to build 'openssh-portable' from ports (security/openssh-portable/) with the following configuration options: PAM=on "Enable pam(3) support" TCP_WRAPPERS=on "Enable tcp_wrappers support" LIBEDIT=on "Enable readline support to sftp(1)" KERBEROS=on "Enable kerberos (autodetection)" SUID_SSH=off "Enable suid SSH (Recommended off)" GSSAPI=on "Enable GSSAPI support (req: KERBEROS)" KERB_GSSAPI=on "Enable Kerberos/GSSAPI patch (req: GSSAPI)" OPENSSH_CHROOT=off "Enable CHROOT support" OPENSC=off "Enable OpenSC smartcard support" OPENSCPINPATCH=off "Enable OpenSC PIN patch" HPN=off "Enable HPN-SSH patch" LPK=off "Enable LDAP Public Key (LPK) patch" OVERWRITE_BASE=off "OpenSSH overwrite base" and get the following error on 'make': ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ... if test ! -z ""; then /usr/bin/perl5 ./fixprogs ssh_prng_cmds ; fi (cd openbsd-compat && make) cc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o sshconnect.o sshconnect1.o sshconnect2.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/ -L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L/lib -lssh -lopenbsd-compat -lcrypto -lutil -lz -lcrypt -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err ./libssh.a(gss-genr.o)(.text+0xa8c): In function `ssh_gssapi_import_name': /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.0p1/gss-genr.c:369: undefined reference to `gss_nt_service_name' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.0p1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I am running a GENERIC kernel on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386). ps: Searched the internet and found some hints that the problem might be caused by the definition of GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE . Any ideas as to what is causing this problem and how could this be fixed? Thanks, Valeriu -- Valeriu Mutu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:17:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB32E106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D668FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-60-45.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.60.45]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6318E16C011C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m6UHHQr2005707 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:17:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:17:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> References: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:17:29 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: > "Joey Mingrone" writes: > > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port > > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being > > updated. > > Alas the news about teTeX is true. I'm very sad to hear this, allthough I'm always installing teTeX via pkg_add -r, and I never found something not working anymore. Is there any consideration to remove teTeX completely from the ports tree, or is it still valid to keep using it? (I use LaTeX for nearly everything: work, documentation, literature, even for letters (dinbrief class), so I'm interested in this topic.) Many thanks for pointing out how to get \LaTeX{} from TeXLive. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:18:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AA11065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824888FC39; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4890A25D.3060606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:18:21 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Lach References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:18:22 -0000 Jakub Lach wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >> Jakub Lach wrote: >>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>> gcc43 as >>> base. >> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >> the GPLv3. > > Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is going to > be omitted? There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. > If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has significant resources behind it (apple, etc). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:31:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284BF1065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EA18FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UHVORX032569; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:31:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C00B6BA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:31:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:31:24 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: dick hoogendijk Message-ID: <20080730173124.GE87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080730184518.99a25681.dick@nagual.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730184518.99a25681.dick@nagual.nl> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:32 -0000 --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:45:18PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:00:00 -0300 > "Joey Mingrone" wrote: >=20 > > Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul > > suggest a installation method that works well for them? >=20 > Install from the TeX Live CD and you get the latest software (FreeBSD > support is included). The latest CD (2007) only has i386 6.x binaries. I've built from source on amd64, but that needs some Makefile hacking to work. Those who are interested can mail me. The advantage of TeXLive is that it is very complete. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQpWwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUVRQCgnH0YSd14eenPUiQRILc0rQFy zo0AoJJFD+0EFe2OnuRdYXLGD+6x2pJH =dVT6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:31:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEB21065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6C78FC15 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UGT1Ne021142; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:29:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3B63DBA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:29:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:29:01 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:31:36 -0000 --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: >=20 > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only with a DVI connection, AFAICT). Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQls0ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVRZwCfYPwpNiNW7ZSCnje/NPIQAig3 A+AAn3NSPZfXHp+sxFCEZtvgbMEkmCxz =4v3/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:38:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A5E1065676 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4758FC14 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UHcCss041206; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:38:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 769BCBA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:38:12 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20080730173812.GF87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B0nZA57HJSoPbsHY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:38:17 -0000 --B0nZA57HJSoPbsHY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:17:26PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: > > "Joey Mingrone" writes: > > > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port > > > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being > > > updated. > >=20 > > Alas the news about teTeX is true. >=20 > I'm very sad to hear this, allthough I'm always installing teTeX > via pkg_add -r, and I never found something not working anymore. > Is there any consideration to remove teTeX completely from the > ports tree, or is it still valid to keep using it? I expect that teTeX will be removed as soon as TeXLive is ported. IIRC, some people are working on that. A problem is that TeXLive has an interactive install script. I'm not sure how well that matches with ports. > (I use LaTeX for nearly everything: work, documentation, literature, > even for letters (dinbrief class), so I'm interested in this topic.) >=20 > Many thanks for pointing out how to get \LaTeX{} from TeXLive. Basic installation is very easy, just use the install script on the CD. If you have to build you own binaries (only i386 6.x binaries are supplied on the CD), it is somewhat more involved. Basically, you need to patch a makefile to remove some omega stuff that won't build. I have some notes from my last build that I could send you if you like. If more people are interested I could post them on the list. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --B0nZA57HJSoPbsHY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQpwQACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUOaACgk9akqQbgxU96tlX4UVrc25g5 SowAoJ1KrUaxddxZyswBqOZBHBEOxqWy =wYGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B0nZA57HJSoPbsHY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:42:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DA4106567E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C978D8FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B914C28469; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:42:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Polytropon References: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:42:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Wed\, 30 Jul 2008 19\:17\:26 +0200") Message-ID: <44ej5bgtg6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:03 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: >> "Joey Mingrone" writes: >> > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port >> > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being >> > updated. >> >> Alas the news about teTeX is true. > > I'm very sad to hear this, allthough I'm always installing teTeX > via pkg_add -r, and I never found something not working anymore. > Is there any consideration to remove teTeX completely from the > ports tree, or is it still valid to keep using it? > > (I use LaTeX for nearly everything: work, documentation, literature, > even for letters (dinbrief class), so I'm interested in this topic.) > > Many thanks for pointing out how to get \LaTeX{} from TeXLive. teTeX still works fine; well enough that I haven't been tempted to try porting TeXLive yet... -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:44:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433F8106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015388FC19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UHijmD078962; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:44:32 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20080730174431.GA75865@thought.org> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:44:35 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what > it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. > So in effect, since all my connections are going thru mt old, analog KVM switch, this won't work. Not only that, but my two desktops would need two new video cards. So best to stick with the older standard ... until So in effect, since all my connections are going thru mt old, analog KVM switch, this won't work. Not only that, but my two desktops would need two new video cards. So best to stick with the older standard. gary > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 17:46:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766651065677 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5762B8FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 20345 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 17:46:31 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2008 17:46:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4890A8D4.4080301@telenix.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:45:56 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:46:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: >> I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen >> with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF >> xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what > it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. > > Roland That 2408 of mine, when it came via freight, had a flyer inside it telling me that they'd included a new interface, over and above the specs, but I forget if it was the HDMI or DisplayPort. I'd never used either before. Really tiny and tight interfaces, both, and probably requiring a protocol like ddc2. There's actually 8 different switchable interfaces (well, seven really, it's got 2 different DVI's.) You can bring in broadcast video by either RCA jack, SVideo, or the component video. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiQqNQACgkQz62J6PPcoOkVgwCeN2of6fc8KX3gK8hBag+9RrLI wIgAniKaNVoNzZAw9Z1j4N2fjUJXEi7z =QOfG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:24:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A571065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from hrimail.hri.res.in (hrimail.hri.res.in [210.212.50.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621BF8FC20 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from ipc2.mri.ernet.in (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by hrimail.hri.res.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0F097F8C; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:02:09 +0530 (IST) Received: from ipc2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipc2 (Postfix) with SMTP id AE8E02314B; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:54:37 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (riemann.mri.ernet.in [192.168.3.122]) by ipc2.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CFD14805; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:54:37 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6UIHYgd020665; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:47:34 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu@riemann.mri.ernet.in) Received: (from raghu@localhost) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m6UIHLF5020664; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:47:21 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu) From: "N. Raghavendra" To: "Joey Mingrone" In-Reply-To: (Joey Mingrone's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:00:00 -0300") References: X-Organization: Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) X-Address: Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India X-URL: http://www.mri.ernet.in/ and http://www.retrotexts.net/ X-Phone: +91 (532) 2667 509, 2667 318, 2667 578, 2567 746, 2567 747 X-Fax: +91 (532) 2667 576, 2567 748, 2567 444, 2568 036 X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x03618806 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: C75D D0AF 457E 7454 BEC2 37AD C6E1 0407 0361 8806 X-OpenPGP-Public-Key-Available-At: http://www.keyserver.net/ Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:47:21 +0530 Message-ID: <868wvj1bke.fsf@riemann.mri.ernet.in> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "N. Raghavendra" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:24:47 -0000 At 2008-07-30T13:00:00-03:00, Joey Mingrone wrote: > My first attempt was to install the latex2e-2003.12_1 port, which > installed the tex-3.14159_3 port as a dependency. This seemed to > work, but there were some things referenced in the documentation that > seemed to be missing. For example, the amsmath package wasn't > available. I thought there must be a port specifically for these > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port > conflicts with the tex port Just deinstall the `tex' and `latex' ports, and install the metaport `print/teTeX', which will pull in all the standard stuff, including AMSLaTeX packages like `amsmath'. Also, install `print/gv' for viewing PostScript files, and `print/acroread8' to view PDF files. After installing these ports, you can view documentation using the command texdoc(1). Here are a few examples for starters: % texdoc lshort will display the `Not So Short Introduction to LATEX2e', a useful primer on LaTeX. % texdoc symbols will show you a list of symbols and their control sequences in LaTeX. % texdoc usrguide will display `LaTeX2e for authors'. % texdoc amsldoc will show you the `User's Guide for the amsmath Package'. % texdoc `texdoc -s 'hyperref.*manual'` will display the manual for the `hyperref' package. Generally, it is worth browsing through `/usr/local/share/texmf-dist/doc'. As for print references, the `LaTeX Companion' by Mittelbach, et al, is very useful, as also is the LaTeX book by Lamport. > Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul > suggest a installation method that works well for them? FWIW, I am a mathematician and have been typesetting mathematics for more than a decade using the teTeX distribution, and have found it sufficient for my needs. I've used TeXLive too, but have not found any need to do so. YMMV. HTH, Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra | http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute | http://www.mri.ernet.in/ See message headers for contact and OpenPGP information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:26:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4029A1065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0036C8FC14 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:64516 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KOGNs-0002HV-6S for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:26:48 +0200 Received: (qmail 28082 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 20:26:45 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2008 20:26:45 +0200 Received: (qmail 52453 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Jul 2008 20:26:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:26:45 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20080730182645.GA52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KOGNs-0002HV-6S. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KOGNs-0002HV-6S 6439514813557044c59cb1f073a7472b Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:26:49 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). No, ddc/ddc2b works just fine over a standard analog VGA-connector as well (assuming both monitor and graphics card supports it, which just about all devices you can buy today does.) Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what > it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. > > Roland -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:31:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545EE106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA058FC1E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:53761 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KOGSU-0003tX-3J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:31:34 +0200 Received: (qmail 28094 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 20:31:31 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2008 20:31:31 +0200 Received: (qmail 52470 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Jul 2008 20:31:31 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:31:31 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080730183131.GB52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080730174431.GA75865@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730174431.GA75865@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KOGSU-0003tX-3J. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KOGSU-0003tX-3J 436c0c1ad515d122eb430f31aa412925 Cc: Roland Smith , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:31:35 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:44:32AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > > > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > > > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > > > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what > > it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. > > > > > So in effect, since all my connections are going thru mt old, > analog KVM switch, this won't work. Not only that, but my two > desktops would need two new video cards. So best to stick with > the > older standard ... until > > > So in effect, since all my connections are going thru mt > old, analog KVM switch, this won't work. Not only that, > but my two desktops would need two new video cards. So > best to stick with the older standard. It should actually work fine over an analog connection (including via a KVM, assuming the KVM is not too old.) It works fine for me anyway. One thing to watch out for when using a KVM is if a computer can get information from the monitor even it is is not the active unit on the KVM. Many newer KVM switches caches the response from the monitor, so all attached computers can get information about the monitor. Older KVM switches typically do not do this, so then you need to have each attached computer be active when it starts to get information from the monitor. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:32:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF8106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail09.ifxnetworks.com (mail09.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04988FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 571 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 18:25:27 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail09.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.2.4 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.3.9.25]) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.52.251]) (envelope-sender ) by mail09.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2008 18:25:27 -0000 Message-ID: <4890B215.7040709@unete.cl> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:25:25 -0400 From: Daniel Molina Wegener Organization: Coder.CL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joey Mingrone References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:32:09 -0000 Joey Mingrone escribió: > Hello, > > I've been told that LaTeX is probably the best solution for creating > scientific papers with math fonts, so I'm trying to get a working > installation. > > My first attempt was to install the latex2e-2003.12_1 port, which > installed the tex-3.14159_3 port as a dependency. This seemed to > work, but there were some things referenced in the documentation that > seemed to be missing. For example, the amsmath package wasn't > available. I thought there must be a port specifically for these > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being > updated. > > Is there a guide for getting all this set up, or can some kind soul > suggest a installation method that works well for them? > > Thanks, > > Joey Mingrone > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Try teTex and other packages regarding it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:33:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C14106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail04.ifxnetworks.com (mail04.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38D38FC29 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 19247 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 18:27:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail04.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.2.4 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.3.9.25]) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.52.251]) (envelope-sender ) by mail04.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2008 18:27:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4890B27F.3030404@unete.cl> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:27:11 -0400 From: Daniel Molina Wegener Organization: Coder.CL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:33:55 -0000 Polytropon escribió: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: > >> "Joey Mingrone" writes: >> >>> fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port >>> conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being >>> updated. >>> >> Alas the news about teTeX is true. >> > > I'm very sad to hear this, allthough I'm always installing teTeX > via pkg_add -r, and I never found something not working anymore. > Is there any consideration to remove teTeX completely from the > ports tree, or is it still valid to keep using it? > > (I use LaTeX for nearly everything: work, documentation, literature, > even for letters (dinbrief class), so I'm interested in this topic.) > > Many thanks for pointing out how to get \LaTeX{} from TeXLive. > > > Try: portinstall -PP teTex Regards, DMW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:46:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF171065677 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail04.ifxnetworks.com (mail04.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4E18FC25 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 23867 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 18:19:30 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail04.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.2.4 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.3.9.25]) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.52.251]) (envelope-sender ) by mail04.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2008 18:19:29 -0000 Message-ID: <4890B0A8.2070305@unete.cl> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:19:20 -0400 From: Daniel Molina Wegener Organization: Coder.CL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DSA - JCR References: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> In-Reply-To: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:46:12 -0000 DSA - JCR escribió: > Hi all > Hi > FreeBSD 6.2 > > I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to > split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also > save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. > > I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) > window(1), screen -- in the ports collection and as terminal emulators, you have yakuake. > Can anyone help me? > > > Thanks in advance > > Juan Coruña > Desarrollo de Software Atlantico > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 18:49:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A3A106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A128FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UInXN2079351; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:49:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:49:19 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Erik Trulsson Message-ID: <20080730184919.GC75865@thought.org> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080730182645.GA52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730182645.GA52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Roland Smith , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:22 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > > > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > > > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > > > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). > > No, ddc/ddc2b works just fine over a standard analog VGA-connector as well > (assuming both monitor and graphics card supports it, which just about all > devices you can buy today does.) > This is the "gotcha." I bought a new, high-end SoundBlaster for my Dell; it didn't fit. Dell only works with certain, proprietary cards -- I don't know which ones. So whether or not my Dell 8200 can even be upgraded is a question. (My Ubuntu desktop is the only new computer; it was custom built in '05; I have never popped the cover. It is strictly generic. ...) > > Effectively the monitor tells Xorg what > > it's capable of WRT resolutions, rehresh rates etc. It's pretty neat. > > > > Roland > > > -- > > Erik Trulsson > ertr1013@student.uu.se -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 19:13:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE8D1065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DCC8FC16 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 002E728469; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:13:24 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <86ej5bs3ns.fsf@nowhere.org> <20080730191726.9fe406ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <44ej5bgtg6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:13:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44ej5bgtg6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Wed\, 30 Jul 2008 13\:42\:01 -0400") Message-ID: <44myjzfanf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: tex, teTex, LaTeX help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:13:26 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Polytropon writes: > >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:59 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: >>> "Joey Mingrone" writes: >>> > fonts, but it seems they are in the teTex port, but that port >>> > conflicts with the tex port and it seems teTex is no longer being >>> > updated. >>> >>> Alas the news about teTeX is true. >> >> I'm very sad to hear this, allthough I'm always installing teTeX >> via pkg_add -r, and I never found something not working anymore. >> Is there any consideration to remove teTeX completely from the >> ports tree, or is it still valid to keep using it? >> >> (I use LaTeX for nearly everything: work, documentation, literature, >> even for letters (dinbrief class), so I'm interested in this topic.) >> >> Many thanks for pointing out how to get \LaTeX{} from TeXLive. > > teTeX still works fine; well enough that I haven't been tempted to try > porting TeXLive yet... I forgot to mention that the FreeBSD documentation project (textproc/docproj*) still uses teTeX, so I keep that installed anyway. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 19:41:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D901065711 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmw-ny@panix.com) Received: from l2mail1.panix.com (l2mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E388FC22 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmw-ny@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by l2mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CE15C504 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:22:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B139F3480E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:22:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from JohnPC (cpe-72-229-177-187.nyc.res.rr.com [72.229.177.187]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A013CFEB3 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:22:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C564DCD5031485291A5A59BCE1F9637@JohnPC> From: "John Wilson" To: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000 Subject: 7.0-stable snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:41:31 -0000 Good day. I recently attempted to install the most recent AMD64 7.0-snapshot onto another system. I chose a minimal install with all of the source distributions as well as ports. Unfortunately, the install fails when attempting to install the scompat tarball. Upon looking at the install CD, it appears that the scompat tarball is not listed in the src directory. src/scompat does seem to appear on a 7.0-release CD. I've attempted to reburn the snapshot with the same results. Naturally, if I omit scompat from the src install options, the install proceeds normally and without error. I'm just curious as to where the problem actually resides. Are the 7.0-snapshots leaving out scompat for some reason? Since I've attempted to download and burn multiple snaps with the same issue, I can't see that I've a corrupt ISO. Thank you for your time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 19:43:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D02106567F for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D73D8FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UJhrpn029858 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:43:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DEBD0BA8E; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:43:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:43:52 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080730194352.GA92985@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080730011634.GA47738@thought.org> <20080730014633.GB47738@thought.org> <20080730162901.GB87099@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080730182645.GA52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730182645.GA52357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: question about new monitor... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:43:55 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:46:33PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > >=20 > > > I've changed my mind:: if I go to 20" i can get widescreen > > > with 1680x1050, so my current 1284x1024 would fit. IFF > > > xorg know what kind of beast this is:-) > >=20 > > Xorg can "talk" to modern monitors using the ddc2 protocol (but only > > with a DVI connection, AFAICT). >=20 > No, ddc/ddc2b works just fine over a standard analog VGA-connector as well > (assuming both monitor and graphics card supports it, which just about all > devices you can buy today does.) I forgot to check on Wikipedia. :) For those who are interested, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_Data_Channel and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_Display_Data_Channel for more in-depth in= fo. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQxHgACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXjVwCeLS3hZz6v5Zxy6dv+ccmclcj7 iXcAoKDhDcWvQphG38rxraZQr3hRzvNI =7anw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:12:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EBF106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (firewall.studsvik-analytic.com [155.212.59.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282358FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from [192.168.169.209] (pc209.studsvik-analytic.com [192.168.169.209]) by bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id m6UJneDj000187 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:57:29 -0700 From: Patrick Baldwin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Building a FreeBSD based mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:12:22 -0000 I posted a few weeks ago about being interested in building a FreeBSD based mail server, and got a lot of good input. In my research since then, I found this: http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 Which seems to me to be a pretty good guide to building a FreeBSD based Postifx/SpamAssassin mailserver. However, never having done this before myself, I was wondering if anyone here had any useful comments about this guide, particularly if you think it's missing any key points that will leave me cursing at my monitor late one night. I'm currently planning on using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE, although I'm certainly open to sugegstions if people think a different version would serve better. -- Patrick Baldwin Systems Administrator Studsvik Scandpower 617-965-7455 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:16:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB14106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) Received: from mx2.securemailscan.com (ob2.scaledsystems.com [209.132.1.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54FA8FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) X-Warning: RFC compliance checks disabled due to whitelist X-Warning: Maximum message size check skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: System filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: Domain filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: User filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: Anti-Spam check skipped due to whitelist X-Whitelist: 2147483549 X-Envelope-From: tt-list@simplenet.com X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: From mta1.scaledsystems.com (209.132.1.201) by mx2.securemailscan.com (MAILFOUNDRY) id 4hTpNl5qEd2pHgAw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:08:24 -0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 81937 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 19:08:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (tt@simplenet.com@75.80.130.243) by mail.ssl.simplenet.com with ESMTPA; 30 Jul 2008 19:08:24 -0000 Message-ID: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:11 -0700 From: Tim Traver User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sendmail base configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:16:16 -0000 Hi all, I know this isn't exactly the right place for a sendmail question, but it has to do with the system configuration, and I'm trying to find some help to create a relatively simple solution (I think)... ok, here is what I want to do, which I have done in the past, but now it doesn't seem to be working... I simply want any submitted email using sendmail to be relayed to another mta for distribution. I want this to happen both from submitted mail from the command line, and from any queues, if the mail is submitted to the running daemon. I use FreeBSD 7.0, and all of the configuration is in /etc/mail/. From what I understand, if I simply set the DS variable to a hostname, it is supposed to use that as the smart relay host, but it is not working. For some reason, it is ignoring that hostname, and attempting to contact the MX record host for the domain name of the machine, which is really weird. So, I tried setting the DS and the MTAHost variables to the IP of the machine I want it to go to, and that seems to work, but oddly enough, sendmail replaces the Rcpt To: variable with my current logged in username@machine host instead of the address that I gave on the command line to send the mail to... So, for instance, I would do a command like this : /usr/sbin/sendmail -v tt@domain.com Subject:test from command line test . tt... Connecting to [209.132.x.xx] via relay... 220 relayhost.scaledsystems.com ESMTP >>> EHLO script5.scaledsystems.com 250-scriptmail.scaledsystems.com 250-PIPELINING 250 8BITMIME >>> MAIL From:<> 250 ok >>> RCPT To: >>> DATA 250 ok 354 go ahead >>> . 250 ok 1217444220 qp 69963 tt... Sent (ok 1217444220 qp 69963) Closing connection to [209.132.x.xx] >>> QUIT 221 relayhost.scaledsystems.com I've checked DNS, etc...but I find it strange that it replaces the RCPT To to be my local user... Is this a bounce or something??? Is it bouncing the message based on some sort of new relaying rules or something? Cause I haven't seen this on older FreeBSD hosts... the version of sendmail is 8.14.2 Thanks, Tim. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:24:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1947106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9158FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UKO0uX019937; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:24:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:23:52 -0500 To: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7892/Wed Jul 30 11:26:47 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6UKO0uX019937 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:24:07 -0000 At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >Hi all, > > >I am fighting the following hardware: > >MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) > >Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on the >channels to 160mb. > >If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. > > >I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm doing, >but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there are no >errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see ahd0 in fdisk. > >There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having >none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy >pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to >and I only have da0 or da1. > > > >Thanks for your time Have you defined an array? If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:25:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFDF1065670 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6A48FC25 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 73BD028469; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:25:51 -0400 (EDT) To: Jonathan McKeown References: <200807291847.40202.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:25:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200807291847.40202.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> (Jonathan McKeown's message of "Tue\, 29 Jul 2008 18\:47\:40 +0200") Message-ID: <44r69b15m8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building modules distributed with Apache, using ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:25:52 -0000 Jonathan McKeown writes: > This may be a daft question. I freely admit it's a lazy one - I'm hoping > someone has a quick answer that'll save me a couple of hours building a test > server and experimenting. > > I built apache 2.0 from ports, using WITH_LDAP - but not WITH_LDAP_MODULES, as > the Makefile.doc says it's implied by WITH_LDAP. As far as I can tell it's > actually the other way round, that WITH_LDAP_MODULES triggers the WITH_LDAP > options (either that or I didn't set it properly). > > Be that as it may, I now have an installation of Apache to which I need to add > mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap from the Apache 2.0 distribution. > > Is it possible to use the www/apache20 port to build these, or additional > modules generally, without rebuilding/reinstalling Apache itself? Not really, no. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:29:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C29D1065679 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660468FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOIIT-0007FT-Hw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:21 -0700 Message-ID: <18742235.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4890A25D.3060606@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> <4890A25D.3060606@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:29:22 -0000 Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: > > Jakub Lach wrote: >> >> >> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>> gcc43 as >>>> base. >>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>> the GPLv3. >> >> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is going >> to >> be omitted? > > There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their > decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. > >> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? > > The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc > developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to > provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has > significant resources behind it (apple, etc). > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thank you very much for all answers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18742235.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 20:33:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EC01065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5631F8FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (localhost.jarasoft.net [127.0.0.1]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5437022D3A; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jara3 (jara-3 [192.168.1.101]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5E6FF22AE0; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: "Jack Raats" To: "Patrick Baldwin" , References: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:29 +0200 Organization: JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-Signed-With-GnuPG: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net Cc: Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD based mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:33:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Baldwin" schreef in bericht news:4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com... >I posted a few weeks ago about being interested in building a FreeBSD based > mail server, and got a lot of good input. In my research since then, I > found > this: > > http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 > > Which seems to me to be a pretty good guide to building a FreeBSD based > Postifx/SpamAssassin > mailserver. However, never having done this before myself, I was > wondering if anyone here > had any useful comments about this guide, particularly if you think it's > missing any key points > that will leave me cursing at my monitor late one night. I should add postgrey and clamsmtp. Postgrey is a very good greylisting filter for postfix and clamsmtp I use for the interface between postfix and clamav. I never heard of Maia-Mailguard but it look like clamsmtp. Jack -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFIkNAaPh5RwW/NzC4RAh9xAJsGuUOYbjIqohoHwlpYJ6BnvabGaACgx0Qp iZpmNJTW5DhO0n3bnS55+aY= =+kzI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 21:20:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E6E106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93868FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6ULKG98021132; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730155021.024dd828@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:06 -0500 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com, keramida@ceid.upatras.gr From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6ULKG98021132 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:20:45 -0000 At 11:04 PM 7/29/2008, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... > >Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer >to use a transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that >the peer will never try to send a packet larger than that? > >I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. >In case it matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and >I've been unable to find a way to limit its packet size directly. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- Just as an FYI, you might want to do: man setsockopt ro man getsockopt Each tcp conversation can have it's own size set along with a bunch of other params. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 21:22:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76F2106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DDB8FC0C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6ULMkp3021213; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:22:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:22:36 -0500 To: "Andy Christianson" , "Ruben de Groot" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.co m> References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6ULMkp3021213 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:23:00 -0000 At 07:52 AM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: >Sendmail is running & DNS is working. See the following output: > >[root@fbsd /home/andy]# /etc/rc.d/sendmail status >sendmail_submit is running as pid 71703. >sendmail_clientmqueue is running as pid 675. >[root@fbsd /home/andy]# ping gmail.com >PING gmail.com (64.233.161.83): 56 data bytes >64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=0 ttl=239 time=19.943 ms >64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=22.096 ms >64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=22.568 ms >64 bytes from 64.233.161.83: icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 time=19.368 ms >^C >--- gmail.com ping statistics --- >4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 19.368/20.994/22.568/1.364 ms >[root@fbsd /home/andy]# mail andy.christianson.2@gmail.com >Subject: Test >This is a test!! >EOT >[root@fbsd /home/andy]# exit >exit >[andy@fbsd ~]$ mail andy.christianson.2@gmail.com >Subject: Another test!! >Test sent from a normal user >EOT >[andy@fbsd ~]$ /home/andy/dead.letter... Saved message in >/home/andy/dead.letter > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 21:31:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC51065693 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@wheelhouse.org) Received: from mail.phx6.nearlyfreespeech.net (mail.phx6.nearlyfreespeech.net [64.38.220.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB50E8FC22 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@wheelhouse.org) Received: from [10.0.1.201] (78.193.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com [65.33.193.78]) by mail.phx6.nearlyfreespeech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1B99EBC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:15:41 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <6C89B0E1-5309-4C27-B0E1-65A7A9FEF9E7@wheelhouse.org> From: Jeff Wheelhouse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:15:40 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Bizarre Diskless Boot Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:31:27 -0000 I have a number of diskless FreeBSD servers. Usually, they work fine. But sometimes when I reboot one, I get weird messages on the console like this: FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root@e2, Sat Jan 19 16:41:40 MST 2008) pxe_open: server addr: 1.2.3.4 pxe_open: server path: /path/to/NFS/Root pxe_open: gateway ip: 1.2.3.1 \ Insert disk labelled Loader.rc and press any key... It isn't always "Loader.rc" though, it seems quasi-random. I've also seen: Insert disk labelled ELF and press any key... Insert disk labelled boot.nfsroot.options="nfsv3,soft,intr,tcp" and press any key... (The latter being the first line of loader.conf.) I think these incidents correspond to the following strange xferlog entries from tftpd on the boot server: Jul 30 20:15:03 xx tftpd[86096]: 1.2.3.11: read request for \.split: File not found Jul 30 20:15:03 xx tftpd[86098]: 1.2.3.11: read request for \.split: File not found Jul 30 20:15:03 xx tftpd[86100]: 1.2.3.11: read request for \.gz.split: File not found Jul 30 20:15:03 xx tftpd[86102]: 1.2.3.11: read request for \.gz: File not found Jul 30 20:15:03 xx tftpd[86104]: 1.2.3.11: read request for \: File not found Rebooting generally makes it go away, so it's not a *big* deal, but I wouldn't want this to happen in the event of an unattended panic/ reboot or something. Does anyone have any ideas what might cause this? Thanks! Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 21:58:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310F91065675 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@powerzone.net.au) Received: from cinta.thebushtelegraph.com.au (christ58.lnk.telstra.net [165.228.0.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0118FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@powerzone.net.au) Received: (qmail 25148 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 07:32:12 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.10.8?) (michael@christie.org.au@10.10.10.8) by cinta.thebushtelegraph.com.au with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 07:32:12 +1000 Message-ID: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:32:23 +1000 From: Michael Christie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Group Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:58:56 -0000 Hi there, I am running webmin and virtualmin on freebsd 7.0, I have found when i add a number of domains using virtualmin and restart apachie i get the following error. [alert] (22)Invalid argument: initgroups: unable to set groups for User www and Group 80... Apachie will not start.. it happens when the 'apache' or 'httpd' user is a member of too many groups. By default, Virtualmin adds the user Apache runs as to each domain's group, which eventually triggers this problem. Can any one advise me how to expand the number of groups allow on freebsd I think my default it is 16, I need to make it 50 to 100 Thank you Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:17:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B93D106564A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF19C8FC17 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so136113ywe.13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=miBrrWeTAanp63mF5jbNcdcB1Wi1NLcTkZUcML0Me/w=; b=fr2wVp52/tPjgohjsvL6GmhZ9T9xlk7Vqpm0zztxbaH3NRuRwal8vt7HWuA2tO/02m 9SipAaJIHCzXrjBBOPBjmzlox/SSKLzdhUR05P2LoZVXIV4lcDTDb7pV7T+tNi6dSbu8 c0NSqMYMNg+XtzYA80ozUHJcXAiG6IPgz0H1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :x-google-sender-auth; b=KmA20kO0xDee2epVQLecbG/ft2/S3zQKIpxK3sgB3XUoCyIPPEy0f0ZQlZQl5jSh3X FfB9PdLUSB7v24j8/e2UkaPmlZeBQTqs8+5mFAUwabNZHotG5TNw8OeaREpv4Ba592uH G1aAFjkrZnDf+U8lMUqoHi6o1pM0nlO+E9bUc= Received: by 10.150.182.17 with SMTP id e17mr83755ybf.130.1217456243161; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.124.5 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90807301517v6c5cd869j95259af3e194050f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:17:23 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 14df29c51a5b6576 Subject: resume (hate to even ask) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:17:24 -0000 Ok, I have too many systems with varying degrees of working freebsd on them, and I can't seem to leave well enough alone. I hear lots of people having sucess with suspend, and I can't get it to work on a single system. My current strongest desire is to get it running on my hp ze4500 laptop. I've played with the stuff in the handbook, but that just took me from having a blank screen and no responses from Ctl-Alt-F(x) to now the fan comes on for a moment on resume, then the system powers off....doesn't seem to matter if X is up or not. I've kldunloaded usb, radeon, sound, drm, what else should I try? Also, rc.resume has a typo, right? I'm susposed to change the #kldunload usb section to add kldload usb (and friends) right? Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:19:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353D1065675 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2218FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so334238rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=JhLKAie2kovQYJF3bRFOaFrD2vXEmwi6qrh6Q82d4KA=; b=wnPa+5GtIj3BzaBSOXqqQMR0zm3mFYgLUGCJy1UQgkMnxNlUkl3AUUM2NviRwTq3KX eOOumDLp2+dNYOTaWBVdbfwd1Gj0uWc9tiPYe9Y/e8JPC3LHXeFQ+RTA7kDzIgn9QPqo RFTNl/SahSZUscjddHiwQ9Tu8DnuEAVvq5EUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=WxwHKDWpRBAmtM8H02gu59Z3WXelDsigSaNqxnwLFX2c1HdffSh/O6dwYq1YwsJKTW Ee2Twk5kmzMk6DTTepqbooAf5Oc7udbo8cSfEBmV6ct9TncliUK5L5HLOfXnHXLSD9OP +qpsObADuKVDE96WfsXnGUDpT71xik8o+OUNM= Received: by 10.141.177.2 with SMTP id e2mr4878027rvp.268.1217456381189; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.189.8 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:19:41 -0700 From: patrick To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: syslog question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:19:42 -0000 I've configured my Apache process to send the ErrorLog to the syslog:local5 facility. In my syslog.conf file, I have: !httpd *.* /usr/local/apache/logs/error_log to catch these log messages. This works great, but these messages are also going into my /var/log/messages which has: *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;lpr.info;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/messag es Apache sends to local5.notice. I have tried add local5.none to this line which according to the man page is suppose to disable all local5 messages, but they still come through. Is there something I'm missing here? Thanks, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:22:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34511065673 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4167A8FC13 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6UMLYjL031628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:21:46 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UMLYwO077031; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:21:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6UMLQKi077030; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:21:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Derek Ragona References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730155021.024dd828@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:21:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730155021.024dd828@mail.computinginnovations.com> (Derek Ragona's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:06 -0500") Message-ID: <87abfzxbbu.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6UMLYjL031628 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.009, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:22:01 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:06 -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: > At 11:04 PM 7/29/2008, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> > [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... >> >> Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer to use a >> transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that the peer will >> never try to send a packet larger than that? >> >> I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In case it >> matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and I've been unable >> to find a way to limit its packet size directly. > > Just as an FYI, you might want to do: > man setsockopt > ro > man getsockopt > > Each tcp conversation can have it's own size set along with a bunch of > other params. Good point. The TCP_MAXSEG can reduce the maximum segment size for a single TCP connection to something smaller than the interface MTU :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:33:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3649C1065688 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A138FC20 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6UMWbMO032059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:44 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6UMWbas079687; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6UMWamo079686; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tim Traver References: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:35 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> (Tim Traver's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:11 -0700") Message-ID: <8763qnxat8.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6UMWbMO032059 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.008, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: bsd Subject: Re: sendmail base configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:39 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:11 -0700, Tim Traver wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this isn't exactly the right place for a sendmail question, but > it has to do with the system configuration, and I'm trying to find > some help to create a relatively simple solution (I think)... > > ok, here is what I want to do, which I have done in the past, but now > it doesn't seem to be working... > > I simply want any submitted email using sendmail to be relayed to > another mta for distribution. I want this to happen both from > submitted mail from the command line, and from any queues, if the mail > is submitted to the running daemon. Set the `SMART_HOST' option in your `custom-sendmail.mc' file. That should do it. > I use FreeBSD 7.0, and all of the configuration is in /etc/mail/. From > what I understand, if I simply set the DS variable to a hostname, it > is supposed to use that as the smart relay host, but it is not > working. For some reason, it is ignoring that hostname, and attempting > to contact the MX record host for the domain name of the machine, > which is really weird. You are not manually editing sendmail.cf, right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:35:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362711065672 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5588FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibblertron@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so343037rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GTsnuFqktr1NVpy2GeVH++t1ANAmRadmR+ar/AdWXv4=; b=bnlbqaq0o8R0CgBvTcOIeZBDbEYMDAJL1/zaPrU+bdVBO8fyE+Qve76+k/HRydO1BJ gc3z6YQHYXw6gHunOJMe9+lbmPWaKGpo53Hid3FBNPyulmzoPgPDtcGpVbiYXQF3mRl+ kUBZq3/hVX1wM3ZqKy5Vzk+q9aGc5gYBsGkw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=OEuFg17g67kpdaKKmU7Catnsr9JaLrPoSU0/bn+3eYaf/27j9fc8M0ID+DG6bcaBWh uIQ3+R5CqCLoahwiXrcRZhXy6+XshvJl3mn7kD/bQWe7F8lgm3n700c615I/ZUQpC+Da mO3ceCBx0LoCpGwZOzOJs4ktROD9sasMhc760= Received: by 10.141.87.13 with SMTP id p13mr4874553rvl.93.1217457313660; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.189.8 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:35:13 -0700 From: patrick To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: syslog question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:35:14 -0000 For some reason, switching Apache to use local3 instead of local5 and updating syslog.conf correspondingly correct this. Weird. Patrick On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:19 PM, patrick wrote: > I've configured my Apache process to send the ErrorLog to the > syslog:local5 facility. > > In my syslog.conf file, I have: > > !httpd > *.* /usr/local/apache/logs/error_log > > to catch these log messages. This works great, but these messages are > also going into my /var/log/messages which has: > > *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;lpr.info;mail.crit;news.err > /var/log/messag > es > > Apache sends to local5.notice. I have tried add local5.none to this > line which according to the man page is suppose to disable all local5 > messages, but they still come through. Is there something I'm missing > here? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:45:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7F21065676 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D68FC2B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so348706rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:45:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=AVlHMO/RltamejUcazMZrO+gwCZThRnpI+HfWBth7qk=; b=CIg8BS+v4gRJRoQ3zIXU80i6xVsRTGD6/bQTqi8fhMqolACz54bMHlNKx94tyaxCPp neel4ftbnKBJmx5t2L2aHGoTCecTvNL9fjciYqOuCa4Dbqs/KZf0XeaA2CjVFa0orBbs 6OuYIZVKwI2Z+H8sDFRWt4d0FuWZ7NaYRxod8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=dIs6zT9JdEa/i0Xe4UPpn9e8jzqdv5oGSf0Z6WojqnxvGMZUo2yonP/6y5ARLaKRwi 2CLEP3k+UCMtLk1u/9rf5+54KMGt51oKp9Q2xk4LG5Mr9gi+c6/H9h+qXBvFC78yZWDD nAKeWMX62bLQVJsfLZMLjDA92Loo+EM48UhNw= Received: by 10.141.153.16 with SMTP id f16mr2824466rvo.17.1217457945570; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.90.11 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24cec69a0807301545g65a683e1x7e64399bf6e4faea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:45:45 -0400 From: "Andy Christianson" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:45:46 -0000 > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > -Derek > /var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... [andy@fbsd ~]$ stat /var/mail 89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 /var/mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 23:21:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21409106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from member@highlandsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from highlandsbaptistchurch.org (mail.highlandsbaptistchurch.org [65.100.136.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B348FC0A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from member@highlandsbaptistchurch.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by highlandsbaptistchurch.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BACBCFDB68 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:31:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from highlandsbaptistchurch.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.highlandsbaptistchurch.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05845-01 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:30:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: by highlandsbaptistchurch.org (Postfix, from userid 1030) id 64A36C4B77E; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:39:43 -0600 (MDT) To: questions@freebsd.org From: received@postcard.org Message-Id: <20080728093943.64A36C4B77E@highlandsbaptistchurch.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:39:43 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at highlandsbaptistchurch.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.631 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=AWL, BAYES_80, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY, NO_RELAYS, SARE_ADULT3 X-Spam-Level: *** MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:21:01 -0000 You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . [1]Click here to pick up your postcard . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset . (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.) . Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard, you can do so by visiting this web address: http://www2.postcards.org/ (Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard" button beneath your postcard!) . We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment to send a few yourself! . Regards, 1001 Postcards http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ References 1. http://focus.qweb.nl/~michael/postcard.gif.exe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 23:24:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0749A106567A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7C88FC27 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UNO28e031150; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:24:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 115B2BA9C; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:24:02 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Michael Christie Message-ID: <20080730232402.GA99013@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Group Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:24:07 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:32:23AM +1000, Michael Christie wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > I am running webmin and virtualmin on freebsd 7.0, I have found when= =20 > i add a number of domains using virtualmin and restart apachie i get the= =20 > following error. > =20 > [alert] (22)Invalid argument: initgroups: unable to set groups for User= =20 > www and Group 80... Apachie will not start.. >=20 >=20 > it happens when the 'apache' or 'httpd' user is a member of too many > groups. By default, Virtualmin adds the user Apache runs as to each > domain's group, which eventually triggers this problem. See group(5): In older implementations, a group cannot have more than 200 members. = The maximum line length of /etc/group is 1024 characters. Longer lines wi= ll be skipped. This limitation disappeared in FreeBSD 3.0. > Can any one advise me how to expand the number of groups allow on > freebsd I think my default it is 16, I need to make it 50 to 100 The number 16 is from /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h. But my /etc/group has 37 groups without problems. In /usr/include/sys/_types.h and /usr/include/sys/stat.h gid_t is defined as __uint32_t, a 32 bits unsigned integer. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiQ+BIACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWGigCeI9gVnv1iMWMzrF5sQ7/ONxR6 +UsAn301VMbxcpIuBLDyW8T62RCSFmGc =JuAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 23:28:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF031065674 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CA58FC1E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-67-188-123-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.123.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6UNSYfm057081 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4890F921.3090607@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:28:33 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Composite manager keeps crashing with KDE, anybody has it working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:28:34 -0000 I keep getting this message in a pop-up during KDE startup: "Composite Manager crashed twice within a minute and is therefore disabled for this session." But if I switch to the black terminal for the period of X/KDE startup this message doesn't come up and composite manager works ok for a long time. Does anybody have composite manager working w/out crashing? I have 7.0-STABLE + AMD3200 + NVidia 6800GT with NVidia driver with acceleration. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 23:40:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A94106566B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18ABF8FC22 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so377297rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:40:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=S6KktBsu4qNhXpog/ooyOzzXyUSAdYDVt0rmSr9nYU4=; b=XHIgcXuu1SzwFrB5Yi/9WGHiymDPBZ0xpI+lXEGHo/zwgT9ckNFHmInOluxB1wvdol WqaK4ZrgmqSfOPKLShGT8CukcSZQKUVGIp32/nuTZ2gTY/G++5hubUwd+4CmO2amlkFm CbSMtriujlh2FL3mkoHDbMdy7PXbsTr3M748Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Ramkidb0ji3F2QKbnxJd+Si2gwWZzXXUSaDjifHaRxuI4zEwc7eaKXQpMRPHVGBElN wxeC6Ph90afbJOWFd61uzBSFpc0NWnmyx5Tg9vcDulTarcOGrana849Vv8eVNs2Bn5yF FxB9FUofB5NO+g43KKPuL90pWPFORCIRckyak= Received: by 10.140.226.13 with SMTP id y13mr4928059rvg.2.1217461235687; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.28.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11167f520807301640v47a6550drabb6e59e2f3b0220@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:40:35 -0500 From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: "Patrick Baldwin" In-Reply-To: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD based mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:40:36 -0000 > http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 does anyone have any links or step by step howto's to do this exact same thing as purplehat.org, but only with PostgreSQL as the backend. I prefer BSD licensed software when I can use it, but I have always had trouble finding documented setups with FreeBSD and PostgreSQL backed Postfix server. if anyone has input that would be great. Sam Fourman Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 23:42:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E78106566C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) Received: from mx2.securemailscan.com (ob2.scaledsystems.com [209.132.1.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403C68FC17 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) X-Warning: RFC compliance checks disabled due to whitelist X-Warning: Maximum message size check skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: System filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: Domain filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: User filters skipped due to whitelist X-Warning: Anti-Spam check skipped due to whitelist X-Whitelist: 2147483549 X-Envelope-From: tt-list@simplenet.com X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: From mta1.scaledsystems.com (209.132.1.201) by mx2.securemailscan.com (MAILFOUNDRY) id JSZctl6REd2nZQAw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:17 -0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 75184 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2008 23:42:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (tt@simplenet.com@75.80.130.243) by mail.ssl.simplenet.com with ESMTPA; 30 Jul 2008 23:42:17 -0000 Message-ID: <4890FC24.1030806@simplenet.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:41:24 -0700 From: Tim Traver User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> <8763qnxat8.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <8763qnxat8.fsf@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bsd Subject: Re: sendmail base configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:18 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:08:11 -0700, Tim Traver wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I know this isn't exactly the right place for a sendmail question, but >> it has to do with the system configuration, and I'm trying to find >> some help to create a relatively simple solution (I think)... >> >> ok, here is what I want to do, which I have done in the past, but now >> it doesn't seem to be working... >> >> I simply want any submitted email using sendmail to be relayed to >> another mta for distribution. I want this to happen both from >> submitted mail from the command line, and from any queues, if the mail >> is submitted to the running daemon. >> > > Set the `SMART_HOST' option in your `custom-sendmail.mc' file. That > should do it. > > I tried that, and regenerated the cf files using "make all", and it still wants to use the MX record of the based domain to send out mail and I can't figure out why. The maillog entries show that it initially tries to use root@localhost as a relay, which doesn't make sense... I'm baffled by its behavior at this point, and don't know how to solve it... help... Tim. >> I use FreeBSD 7.0, and all of the configuration is in /etc/mail/. From >> what I understand, if I simply set the DS variable to a hostname, it >> is supposed to use that as the smart relay host, but it is not >> working. For some reason, it is ignoring that hostname, and attempting >> to contact the MX record host for the domain name of the machine, >> which is really weird. >> > > You are not manually editing sendmail.cf, right? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:12:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D576106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0762F8FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so392612rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:11:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=IJK3tpIE2A9yjXJq9cz1QoAaw9Oo2ZQajzYDkYKv0Tg=; b=e0SMKyOpWmN5AAMFOrHOp/NOuS7+GkMLWIQ4iNb5Epjqmv3D02jxTNqrTQ/Lxae0T1 YPBNs8PE6QjBbAMYN5pum/nXMrX7uJq1OhcBzQkcXTvc+ZKlMlYJNlarh3S8DUADUvtI ZTOBKW4QwMKlpjIv7MSdyqIUuYwlpukCJHLAI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=O5cxMlWf+9K9z4Z4RAxS+j7Q0NCougS7tdTPh3eijW78fEKCqqSzL8NPeO84GOOtmb 84KMeCubHEIl2j/Y9VQ1F9WsVJy/d9Hfjj7L1UQwBUhWrvSU1jZea5S/a1x+vionZuG6 UyKynEIcIJSJjelARbh4l0JMLvSrDbH0Lscrk= Received: by 10.140.141.16 with SMTP id o16mr4904513rvd.209.1217461535577; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.53.9 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b5f066d0807301645k73f4eb07tc7117ece38cb9bac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:45:35 -0400 From: "Brian McCann" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: rsync & samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:12:00 -0000 Hi all. I'm having a problem that I can't seem to solve, and so far I can't find anything to point me in the right direction. I've got a Samba server mounted using "mount_smbfs -I 192.168.0.3 //administrator@mater/share", and I'm trying to rsync from a local drive to the smb mount. It's always trying to replace certain files, of varying sizes in varying places on the source drive. The MD5 sums never match after an rsync. If I use cp to copy the files, the MD5s match, but if I then run rsync again, it replaces it with a bad file again. I'm using rsync 3.0.3, on FreeBSD 7-Release. My copy destination is a NAS, which is only accessible via Samba. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, --Brian -- _-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_-=-_ Brian McCann "I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of people waiting to abuse me." -- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:15:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28856106567D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.dca.untd.com (outbound-mail.dca.untd.com [64.136.47.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D838FC19 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) X-UOL-TAGLINE: true Received: from outbound-bu1.dca.untd.com (webmail20.dca.untd.com [10.171.12.160]) by smtpout01.dca.untd.com with SMTP id AABEKB9PMADHL8JS for (sender ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:47:55 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRG0qtQ/7agyYrXyHOAAGJJcujR9n+356gw== Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail20.dca.untd.com (jqueuemail) id NRDUY27K; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:47:51 PDT Received: from [96.232.136.147] by webmail20.dca.untd.com with HTTP: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:47:06 GMT X-Originating-IP: [96.232.136.147] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:47:06 GMT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Message-Id: <20080730.194706.2049.0@webmail20.dca.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 1:1:2061386106 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.171.12.160|webmail20.dca.untd.com|outbound-bu1.dca.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: C++ compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:15:00 -0000 What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do= I have to do devious things to eventually find it? ____________________________________________________________ Are you Catholic and single? Click Here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oGxtfMGTyKQeDjl1IylHH= 1Cv62LFl9vpA1NFNNk54pbECB6/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:19:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733CE1065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246F88FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V0J08C042431; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:19:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191633.0252f4c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:18:54 -0500 To: "Andy Christianson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <24cec69a0807301545g65a683e1x7e64399bf6e4faea@mail.gmail.co m> References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> <24cec69a0807301545g65a683e1x7e64399bf6e4faea@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6V0J08C042431 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:19:09 -0000 At 05:45 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > > > -Derek > > > >/var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... > >[andy@fbsd ~]$ stat /var/mail >89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 >16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 >/var/mail I would kick up the logging on sendmail to see better what is going on and where the failure really is. You can add: -O LogLevel=80 To your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf Since root can send mail but regular users cannot, it sounds like a permission problem somewhere. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:20:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319E91065682 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6198FC0C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V0KoQs027299; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:20:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:20:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: "gs_stoller@juno.com" In-Reply-To: <20080730.194706.2049.0@webmail20.dca.untd.com> Message-ID: <20080730202006.L12541@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20080730.194706.2049.0@webmail20.dca.untd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C++ compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:20:52 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, gs_stoller@juno.com wrote: > What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do > I have to do devious things to eventually find it? # cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42 # make install clean -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:21:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37585106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029F58FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so397542rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:from; bh=1f6rVXrqxxAB1YYN8h2sIyOC6YanPrYqj89TUGCFnhM=; b=koux5gtQbpwOOvoWNH5yvVvKDqmIPlC1E3NWw7DWixO5zjuFqi9DAO8ZGn0OuNxots zXHwS3IJN3+wTp+H2nUnqrdauVevg0W8R8OYr1bTdI0k7esjY4R8V4DWSa7mqylgUN4P jaO8uw2V7FaIsypdC/K7xVS0eMRyXNECQhHo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:from; b=SF0jR9VWWOw/fjNjtPWZe2sNZNh66NrNDBp1njVUbMarZyglbrv1Qw24nmGya5uWOV 2YqGX1oHnqtQT6bexOWsAGAooKnO1uK/gHayoi7C7Lk1lcAgD5ffE3/aYw5adR/34TW+ FQibBd2yacSb0E8QdnJvMcG3mbbZR6FZ9MCMw= Received: by 10.142.48.14 with SMTP id v14mr3020011wfv.121.1217463267949; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.133? ( [210.15.215.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm3072464wff.18.2008.07.30.17.14.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:14:21 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:21:37 -0000 Hi Derek, As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS (SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as the NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could find a USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors to consider. Regards Derek Ragona wrote: > At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I am fighting the following hardware: >> >> MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >> Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >> SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >> HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >> >> Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >> standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput >> on the channels to 160mb. >> >> If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >> >> >> I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >> doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as >> there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not >> see see ahd0 in fdisk. >> >> There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >> Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am >> having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no >> lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to >> install to and I only have da0 or da1. >> >> >> >> Thanks for your time > > Have you defined an array? > > If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large > hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec > BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. > > The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled > in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is > believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:23:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40831065679 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930FE8FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V0NPuN042571; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:23:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:23:15 -0500 To: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6V0NPuN042571 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:23:33 -0000 At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >Hi Derek, > >As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS >(SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. > >The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE > >dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and states >that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as the NIC >adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could find a USB >key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors to consider. > >Regards What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you did, with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the stripped compendium of both disks. -Derek >Derek Ragona wrote: >>At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com >>wrote: >>>Hi all, >>> >>> >>>I am fighting the following hardware: >>> >>>MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >>>Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >>>SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >>>HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >>> >>>Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >>>standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on >>>the channels to 160mb. >>> >>>If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >>> >>> >>>I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >>>doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there >>>are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see >>>ahd0 in fdisk. >>> >>>There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >>>Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am having >>>none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no lengthy >>>pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to install to >>>and I only have da0 or da1. >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks for your time >> >>Have you defined an array? >> >>If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard >>disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you >>will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. >> >>The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled >>in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. >> >> -Derek >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:28:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E911065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791AA8FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so312468fkk.11 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=k/Dv6MCew8Uo/XnlrbjH2FRK0QMS9JQPaUxW4Vg7LL8=; b=CP1FT/1azTnEg5VSfFcrkjPLjJRyl5wCzLxJM/Kfpq3l8yflvSpr1SIQvURmrd15ts T5kiN0v8H0wszKYD5rEEuj6UiDZr3nveLFV3V5As2RlLOPBRhXVlkKqong5UbURvnab8 xT5TvOdwCCaf8uKYlnw4TwLXv0FhmSgq9R3Ao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lyzt7PqGrLVMIqm4Iua0cvYcuqsCaNwbGzhh+lTkeO2FhYjTNVDtNF/dTmsWLd/Fpz /WHACDj18ULIa4IDTkTWab4ncv1MOemh8o4TIeuWeFkdlQ5TVYa2QcwMtWM90pLz/f91 5sg6GQOpw1TjAe2AQVpjs5DAxHWdHXZzKZGWk= Received: by 10.187.208.18 with SMTP id k18mr165567faq.33.1217464113378; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807301728r5d647f95v89c12d42e8f8fb83@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:28:33 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: david.gurvich@verizon.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <391934950807300537k4469b64cs64fca56b4310600c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <006901c8f240$045f91e0$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> <391934950807300537k4469b64cs64fca56b4310600c@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:28:35 -0000 Hmm. That's interesting. I loaded all acpi_* modules and did a "sysctl -a | grep -i vol" but unfortunately, nothing came out. I'm wondering where else could we look at? I really want to make it work. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:33:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CA81065677 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAE88FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so403048rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:33:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:from; bh=PVESNIfmDf+SOeFq47ruMb/d7tIbA32owh1YcS1ltsQ=; b=jzG8vYpKONSKl8q+8D+UDiNWl5QnyNhAHAQzzMTAf4jzK/BaKHdCl7eFNInTbJOzUE Bwm/VfodpQGIuk3bg79SwzphGWrJByZzQAiEUKn3cetafOfXSd114laf6KeG5k32n1Qv rxSxSuUn1Yy/hvI3U9F9UW95W7VmCIWkYyo4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:from; b=xd+d42ynktRv4a9OytiTK6NencCq0w/2H46WO6dx+nNTB1vAcm4Rodyb++cqfS2/i5 EnZsY1GNa12jBVHFeeoHhDYFqTSaeNTY1Bep93lbFTfAn8aYr1CcACjN4Md7a3hTgYqV h7Srl6IYFvJF3AvZbwfipQVoRIC0nddOLcAaM= Received: by 10.114.180.1 with SMTP id c1mr9454652waf.85.1217462819609; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.133? ( [210.15.215.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v35sm3575236wah.12.2008.07.30.17.06.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4891021D.9050403@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:06:53 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nightrecon@verizon.net References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:33:32 -0000 Thanks Michael, I have already been through the SCSI Select/HostRAID ROM and configured the disks as RAID0. I am unfortunately at work at this moment, so I can not check ar0, however I seem to recall it is already taken by my ATA array. I had not mentioned this array as it is only for storage and the problem exists regardless of whether or not it is connected. Regards Michael Powell wrote: > ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> >> >> I am fighting the following hardware: >> >> MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >> Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >> SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >> HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >> >> Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >> standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on >> the channels to 160mb. >> >> If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >> >> >> I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >> doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there >> are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see see >> ahd0 in fdisk. >> >> > [snip] > > Sounds like you might be able to see the individual drives which may > indicate termination and other stuff is OK. During boot (POST time before > OS starts to load) you press CTRL-A (both keys together) to get into the > Adaptec card BIOS. You can configure your drives as an array here. There is > supposed to be a message on the screen but this message can be disabled by > BOFH. Been a while since I've done this, but IIRC after creating the array > and rebooting you would then install to ar0. > > -Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:36:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFD2106566B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2FF8FC16 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so404281rvf.43 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=oaFUxDFUODDUCYivPcI9qwhsqYjnSOnIUUbHZQqdxdY=; b=dXwz/HcVDXkvVX8WR7V09z5iEPRLjoVtub9fNvduyCGQi+WvY03H2QAo9gcq+kqjtw xyeEWoZe0Txf1oljebJQzqDndAszE8nLGTUGfuRL9JV1bqRghCCpLpNva6jZe89/JaM5 hMExA1DQjn0HfZedsvoBdSLbA2/cF3c9EmvM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=eN0JLcJIvhnJXxI0WAx26zVv3BhZ25M0ea5DmcNrWxTi0I13U53P1seeCjIg8YMEA6 UqHoqoSIJ2wKpibR0OFNME4Q6wqd1xWIWKLH8kBnd/ioJ7GVhWD1hzzWmwsO95a34xok lPFnRsxP1Aue+Yp+P7jzSqAluqrxxaMCDUCRY= Received: by 10.141.97.5 with SMTP id z5mr4928869rvl.197.1217464580302; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sniper ( [71.221.182.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g22sm2566617rvb.7.2008.07.30.17.36.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:36:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Falanga To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:35:17 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Subject: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:36:21 -0000 Hi, I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3 (I use dovecot). At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see authid= in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One of the pastor's told me the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using Outlook, I'm not sure of the version. What problems do people here usually encounter with Outlook mail clients and their SMTP servers? At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what might be keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive e-mail POP3. Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:46:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACBE1065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875C78FC14; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48910B47.4080205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:45:59 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hill References: <20080730.194706.2049.0@webmail20.dca.untd.com> <20080730202006.L12541@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20080730202006.L12541@tripel.monochrome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "gs_stoller@juno.com" Subject: Re: C++ compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:46:00 -0000 Chris Hill wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, gs_stoller@juno.com wrote: > >> What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do >> I have to do devious things to eventually find it? > > # cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42 > # make install clean Or install FreeBSD 7.0 and do nothing else. # g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:53:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55107106567F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202788FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so226812wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=Db8jUrA+NG3V0RQYYKTzD9CWXyTEvGUprMM8ulCrRzM=; b=kVRlDfQ28tvmLXlZcodZ1SLyrRYW+Iqy7nx79czFeOPlEyR8OxGkk9nDVyLoMCYYIc xTn2N8NrTETWL9KyTe270WZKkAP3qesK8Wi7Vj1Pngl2/OH6sGyHGlvZFwjJJWLM5g86 Fe+yNUsr8Wk0mizbmHnZTC7i4IqXNKaLu2As4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=Y+GhcnM/blEnyOJ7NfpyGayuH723hIv7aIt2oMMQIhbLZD2ztZMvSd9q9W/hQVlzxz 0WSbBgHLVlZZM042zN3DFQyUYgLnok7veeiloCJzyWXSkkNnE2LhS3jcUxvTCsIb/e39 uF6rRaQGAtKbI35HeyJqR7cGNZ2mnccXwFSNI= Received: by 10.142.148.10 with SMTP id v10mr3023968wfd.317.1217465606733; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.133? ( [210.15.215.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm3163310wfi.11.2008.07.30.17.53.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48910D00.4070100@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:53:20 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 -0000 Thanks for the quick reply! I created the array in the Adaptec BIOS and confirmed it with an XP installer disk, which gave me the option to install to the array as I had named it. I have to apologise for not having the actual dmesg handy but identifies the disks much like the example below, but with Seagate disks. It does not identify any striping or make any differentiation between the discs other than the target id. . da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) Regards Derek Ragona wrote: > At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi Derek, >> >> As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS >> (SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. >> >> The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE >> >> >> dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and >> states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as >> the NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could >> find a USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors >> to consider. >> >> Regards > > What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? > > Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you > did, with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the > stripped compendium of both disks. > > -Derek > > > > > >> Derek Ragona wrote: >>> At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, >>> ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> >>>> I am fighting the following hardware: >>>> >>>> MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >>>> Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >>>> SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >>>> HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >>>> >>>> Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >>>> standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput >>>> on the channels to 160mb. >>>> >>>> If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >>>> doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as >>>> there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can >>>> not see see ahd0 in fdisk. >>>> >>>> There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >>>> Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am >>>> having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no >>>> lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk >>>> to install to and I only have da0 or da1. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your time >>> >>> Have you defined an array? >>> >>> If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large >>> hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec >>> BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. >>> >>> The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters >>> compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. >>> >>> -Derek >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:03:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61C91065674 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247AD8FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6V22mXL013568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:02:57 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V22mY4082790; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:02:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6V22kHa082789; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:02:46 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tim Traver References: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> <8763qnxat8.fsf@kobe.laptop> <4890FC24.1030806@simplenet.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:02:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4890FC24.1030806@simplenet.com> (Tim Traver's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:41:24 -0700") Message-ID: <87zlnyvmih.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6V22mXL013568 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.008, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail base configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:03:05 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:41:24 -0700, Tim Traver wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Set the `SMART_HOST' option in your `custom-sendmail.mc' file. That >> should do it. > > I tried that, and regenerated the cf files using "make all", and it > still wants to use the MX record of the based domain to send out mail > and I can't figure out why. > > The maillog entries show that it initially tries to use root@localhost > as a relay, which doesn't make sense... > > I'm baffled by its behavior at this point, and don't know how to solve > it... The default `freebsd.mc' that is distributed with the base system of FreeBSD is already properly set up to do what you described. I use a heavily customized version of `freebsd.mc', but most of my local changes are not necessary for using a SMART_HOST. Can you show me your `hostname.mc' and `*submit.mc' files? - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:17:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F191065682 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772A08FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V2GttW044411; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:16:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730211341.025302f0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:16:49 -0500 To: Andrew Falanga , FreeBSD Questions From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6V2GttW044411 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:17:04 -0000 At 07:35 PM 7/30/2008, Andrew Falanga wrote: >Hi, > >I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to >receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3 >(I use dovecot). > >At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using >the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. > >As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see authid= >in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One of the pastor's told me >the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using Outlook, I'm not sure of >the version. What problems do people here usually encounter with Outlook >mail clients and their SMTP servers? > >At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what might be >keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive e-mail POP3. > >Thanks, >Andy Andy, These errors can be some of the hardest to track down. I would go to one of the problem users and try sending email with their client as you watch the maillog from a ssh window. Outlook and Outlook express send mail a bit differently so you will need to know which client they are using. Also, if sending mail was working, and just stopped, I'd suspect some microsoft patch as the culprit. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:24:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126CC1065684 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02A98FC15 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V2O0O5044517; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:24:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730212205.02530430@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:23:54 -0500 To: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <48910D00.4070100@gmail.com> References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> <48910D00.4070100@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080730-0, 07/30/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7894/Wed Jul 30 12:26:14 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6V2O0O5044517 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:24:09 -0000 At 07:53 PM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >Thanks for the quick reply! > >I created the array in the Adaptec BIOS and confirmed it with an XP >installer disk, which gave me the option to install to the array as I had >named it. > > >I have to apologise for not having the actual dmesg handy but identifies >the disks much like the example below, but with Seagate disks. > >It does not identify any striping or make any differentiation between the >discs other than the target id. >. > >da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 >da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: >320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled >da0: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) >da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 >da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: >320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled >da1: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) > > > >Regards > Are you seeing any aacd drives in the dmesg? This would be the device name for an advanced adaptec raid drive. -Derek >Derek Ragona wrote: >>At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >>>Hi Derek, >>> >>>As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS >>>(SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. >>> >>>The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, >>>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE >>> >>> >>>dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and >>>states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as the >>>NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could find a >>>USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors to consider. >>> >>>Regards >> >>What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? >> >>Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you did, >>with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the stripped >>compendium of both disks. >> >> -Derek >> >> >> >> >> >>>Derek Ragona wrote: >>>>At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, >>>>ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I am fighting the following hardware: >>>>> >>>>>MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >>>>>Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >>>>>SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >>>>>HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >>>>> >>>>>Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >>>>>standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput on >>>>>the channels to 160mb. >>>>> >>>>>If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >>>>>doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as there >>>>>are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can not see >>>>>see ahd0 in fdisk. >>>>> >>>>>There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >>>>>Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am >>>>>having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no >>>>>lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk to >>>>>install to and I only have da0 or da1. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Thanks for your time >>>> >>>>Have you defined an array? >>>> >>>>If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large hard >>>>disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec BIOS you >>>>will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. >>>> >>>>The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters compiled >>>>in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. >>>> >>>> -Derek >>>> >>>>-- >>>>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>>>believed to be clean. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>>believed to be clean. > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 02:51:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC571065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casparos@yahoo.de) Received: from n8a.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com (n8a.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B709E8FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casparos@yahoo.de) Received: from [217.146.182.177] by n8.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 02:37:36 -0000 Received: from [87.248.111.145] by t3.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 02:37:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 02:37:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 311816.89269.bm@omp202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 31881 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 02:37:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=h83Z2w69gS/NagvxIxggG7ENv8yuf9mQ24utFHNaE/VlwnNQqmnH+ddu1deYf5xx/GXD5AZ+ORQsWRwCyxMIqLg3LiS3JqLo0olTj1QrEZzTB+tS+j0cGNo3TeTA6XQlPJL1vuABNroKsuGaCeoJWP4Bj/8GMsFfmFOeI5JR3QQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.220.100?) (casparos@yahoo.de@77.134.40.79 with plain) by smtp104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 02:37:36 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: bTeLIacVM1lyFPhW8RDJ7sWqdeCo8BSEOIk2BNNP8XuitRQ8oPTGuBkqPAc9kk0YA2e5GRSktsF.RYV4Bw7pVpmEwGkP_1fzV_t2Cjk0sA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:37:34 +0200 From: Markus Mueller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:51:13 -0000 I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. How can I change the Name of this OS ? I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of servers, which I connect by sufing in the web and in application which locate the OS instead "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" will be displayed. Thanks for Helping and fast answers. ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 03:08:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0528E106568D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E258FC1B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy.christianson.2@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so264352wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ru9gh6kG8Ah1TVNiTTICcUQJHeMCbWrJrCIP1kci75Y=; b=RqlgMZZwC5t5+uOQcs75u54+jsAtTv9i/9obqqAeb0sIMIWjhRxowY6ZYU5u1sNBW1 rZMJyM9pbEXsweSJg7fR84THszjV6jPJJY6otUt1WLuORmtSMz8bq6NmSikYmBur2zgp ahMlzgHU3h5ojv8xY2mEvMwU2bhBaxCWqF+Pk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=IVt3K/eM2UjRjJRCNr6Wgtc91bvaYc7G/U+SmN/PEAN2rHO6jFhDpiepjCII1g2Rqi tnR9xLCAR3nxYnTytLzYeQ4Zt+S1FlPffXEFKLMjLNKlm6D2TQhyDseLrqUBS0NfLfsI 7eOVqRp7Sx2OlW1B11lqNHcbCcAdTjzk1f62c= Received: by 10.142.164.10 with SMTP id m10mr3080200wfe.60.1217473731534; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.51.7 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24cec69a0807302008t321cda98t7ff0443f8e4498af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:08:51 -0400 From: "Andy Christianson" To: "Derek Ragona" In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191633.0252f4c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> <24cec69a0807301545g65a683e1x7e64399bf6e4faea@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191633.0252f4c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:08:52 -0000 > > At 05:45 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > > > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > > > -Derek > > > > /var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... > > [andy@fbsd ~]$ stat /var/mail > 89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 > 16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 > /var/mail > > > > I would kick up the logging on sendmail to see better what is going on and > where the failure really is. You can add: > -O LogLevel=80 > To your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf > > Since root can send mail but regular users cannot, it sounds like a > permission problem somewhere. > > -Derek > It turns out that FreeBSD wasn't happy with its host name. I changed it to a host name that resolves properly, and sendmail began to work as expected. Thanks for looking at this. -Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 03:18:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD3A1065675 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFEC8FC1A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V3Hvtl008203; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:17:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6V3Hump008200; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:17:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:17:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Tim Traver In-Reply-To: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> Message-ID: References: <4890BC1B.8040700@simplenet.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:17:58 -0600 (MDT) Cc: bsd Subject: Re: sendmail base configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:18:00 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Tim Traver wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this isn't exactly the right place for a sendmail question, but it has > to do with the system configuration, and I'm trying to find some help to > create a relatively simple solution (I think)... > > ok, here is what I want to do, which I have done in the past, but now it > doesn't seem to be working... > > I simply want any submitted email using sendmail to be relayed to another mta > for distribution. I want this to happen both from submitted mail from the > command line, and from any queues, if the mail is submitted to the running > daemon. Here's what I do: cd /etc/mail delete .mc if present make edit hostname.mc, set SMART_HOST line: define(`SMART_HOST', `mysmarthost.com') make all install restart -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 03:19:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F91B106567A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D88FC15 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6V3J0AA018290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:19:07 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V3J0IO084158; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:19:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6V3IxRt084157; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:18:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Markus Mueller References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:18:59 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> (Markus Mueller's message of "Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:37:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87d4kuvizg.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6V3J0AA018290 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.007, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:19:11 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:37:34 +0200, Markus Mueller wrote: > I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. How can I change the > Name of this OS ? I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of servers, > which I connect by sufing in the web and in application which locate > the OS instead "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" will be > displayed. By editing all the places where the string 'FreeBSD' appears This sounds a bit like 'stating the obvious', but if you are really going to create a *new* OS, it's the only valid answer. The license of many parts of FreeBSD permits this sort of thing, and there is _nothing_ that can stop you from doing that. Having said that, what you want to do is a fairly daunting task, and changing the name is probably going to be the *least* difficult part of it all, once you grab a copy of the source tree and start hacking on it. Good luck with your efforts :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 06:05:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12997106567C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7548FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (106.6.192-77.rev.gaoland.net [77.192.6.106]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6B9663365B; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:00:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from baby-jane-lamaiziere-net.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873DD5785E8; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:05:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:05:39 +0200 From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731080539.1f453461@baby-jane-lamaiziere-net.local> In-Reply-To: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Organization: /dave/nulle X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-apple-darwin9.3.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Andrew Falanga Subject: Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:05:45 -0000 Le Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:35:17 -0600, Andrew Falanga a écrit : > Hi, > > I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are > able to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently > configured for POP3 (I use dovecot). > > At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine > using the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for > this. > > As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see > authid= in the mail log (I'm using TLS with > sendmail). One of the pastor's told me the error he's seeing is > "timeout." They are using Outlook, I'm not sure of the version. > What problems do people here usually encounter with Outlook mail > clients and their SMTP servers? > > At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what > might be keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive > e-mail POP3. May be their ISPs filter the port 25 now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 06:46:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B8A1065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com [67.222.38.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C710E8FC2B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 23528 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jul 2008 06:46:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 06:46:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=MOaRTpDfptLsox+ggQtZ9cppSzeTzfWmLNsuQXSujtaRD1wvmu2pgul8/AptG7I5nmJVFK6SI/NbzQ1cOJCX5Zo8/WeWwbYDGesTR256S7D4NpBdN1LPTzS43hFjr6gb; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KORvT-00016M-Lh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:46:15 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:40:15 -0600 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:40:14 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731064014.GA1841@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45851.217.114.136.134.1217410273.squirrel@mail.dsa.es> <20080730142236.GB11244@ozzmosis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730142236.GB11244@ozzmosis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: seen in ports and used but dont remember the name ;) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:46:20 -0000 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:22:36AM +1000, andrew clarke wrote: > On Wed 2008-07-30 09:31:13 UTC-0000, DSA - JCR (juancr@dsa.es) wrote: >=20 > > I have used in the past year an utility for terminal that permit me to > > split the terminal in several sesions vertically/horizontally and also > > save and restore the sesion, letting it doing some commands. > >=20 > > I installed from ports, but I dont remember its name. ;-) >=20 > You are probably describing sysutils/screen, although recently I've > switched to misc/tmux, which works in a similar way. Yeah, probably Screen -- but, like you, I also prefer tmux. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Larry Wall: "Perl is, in intent, a cleaned up and summarized version of that wonderful semi-natural language known as 'Unix'." --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiRXk4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXZmACgsaMqEQje8jObU0fSAaKLRUnU GfAAoKYd9rabvdFP2uFt30At8ORhqGAB =hrm1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 07:04:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32E31065675 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C134A8FC1B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOSCd-0001RG-Dx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:03:59 -0700 Message-ID: <18748908.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:03:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Maximillian Dornseif To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: md@hudora.de Subject: Handling of daily and weekly mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:04:01 -0000 I administer about a dozen FreeBSD Servers. This results in me getting about 100 mails a week from the PERIODIC(8) scripts. Obviously this is to much to read with care. I wonder what the canonical approach is to handling hundreds of status mails like the ons generated by periodic. Any Hints? --md -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Handling-of-daily-and-weekly-mails-tp18748908p18748908.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 07:07:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB901065674 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E128FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6V72n7C065275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:02:49 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:07:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807310907.41947.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Spam-Score: -4.371 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Cc: Andrew Falanga Subject: Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:07:03 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 02:35, Andrew Falanga wrote: > Hi, > > I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able > to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for > POP3 (I use dovecot). > > At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using > the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. > > As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see > authid= in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One > of the pastor's told me the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using > Outlook, I'm not sure of the version. What problems do people here usually > encounter with Outlook mail clients and their SMTP servers? > > At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what might be > keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive e-mail POP3. I'm using TLS and SMTP AUTH with sendmail - all my users are on Microsoft Outlook 2003 (bar one on Thunderbird and me on KMail). Outlook didn't do TLS properly until Outlook 2003 Service Pack 2 or 3 - the symptom was repeated timeouts on trying to send mail. Even after upgrading all the users to SP3, we still occasionally have a similar problem. A user will try to send mail, the TLS negotiation will time out, and from that point on mail will just accumulate in the outbox. Outlook has to be closed down and restarted before it will correctly try the TLS connection again. We also encountered another issue, which may or may not be related to using a Windows AD domain, which was that Outlook will reuse message-IDs - generally by copying the message-ID of an original message and using it as the message-ID for the reply. This one bit me twice: once when a user (quite correctly) complained that she was losing email. On investigation, it turned out that her manager had sent three or four different messages in reply to messages of hers, and Cyrus imapd had binned them all as duplicates based on the copied message-ID. I had to switch off duplicate suppression in imapd. The second time - which I haven't found a solution for - is in Mailman. The HTML pages for archives are built using the assumption that message-IDs are unique: the result is that when two messages have the same message-ID, only one of them will appear in the archive. (Which one is random, so I suspect Mailman is using the message ID as a hash key internally). I get the feeling that Microsoft pay lip-service to the standards, but don't really carry out proper testing against anything other than Microsoft Exchange (after all, why would you use anything else?!). Outlook doesn't support IMAP well. Worst, from my point of view, I have regular complaints that people using POP3 are losing email. By using telemetry in Cyrus imapd, I've been able to establish that there's no problem server-side: Outlook is downloading the mail, and then throwing it away. Try telling a user that Microsoft stuffed up, though. (Sorry - this turned into an Outlook rant. I hope you find some benefit in the early paragraphs, before I started frothing at the mouth and throwing my toys). Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 07:10:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5D0106567B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDE18FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6V76X4E065481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:06:33 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:11:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <18748908.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <18748908.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807310911.25960.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> X-Spam-Score: -4.376 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Cc: Maximillian Dornseif Subject: Re: Handling of daily and weekly mails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:10:43 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 09:03, Maximillian Dornseif wrote: > I administer about a dozen FreeBSD Servers. This results in me getting > about 100 mails a week from the PERIODIC(8) scripts. Obviously this is to > much to read with care. > > I wonder what the canonical approach is to handling hundreds of status > mails like the ons generated by periodic. Depends how much you want to read them. man periodic.conf You can have the results put in a log file rather than emailed to you, if you prefer. You can also control the verbosity of the reports, so if you're very interested in some stats and not at all in others, you can suppress the boring ones. Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 07:27:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BDD106566B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3918FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 8626E142071; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:27:19 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from iris.teledomenet.local (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB3B142027; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:26:47 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:27:37 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730155021.024dd828@mail.computinginnovations.com> <87abfzxbbu.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <87abfzxbbu.fsf@kobe.laptop> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807311027.37878.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , perryh@pluto.rain.com, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:27:21 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 01:21:25 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:20:06 -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 11:04 PM 7/29/2008, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > >> > [TCP] splits traffic to 'segments' using its own logic ... > >> > >> Is there a simple way for a FreeBSD system to cause its peer to use a > >> transmit segment size of, say, 640 bytes -- so that the peer will > >> never try to send a packet larger than that? > >> > >> I'm trying to get around a network packet-size problem. In case it > >> matters, the other end is SunOS 4.1.1 on a sun3, and I've been unable > >> to find a way to limit its packet size directly. > > > > Just as an FYI, you might want to do: > > man setsockopt > > ro > > man getsockopt > > > > Each tcp conversation can have it's own size set along with a bunch of > > other params. > > Good point. The TCP_MAXSEG can reduce the maximum segment size for a > single TCP connection to something smaller than the interface MTU :) Just adding that MTU can be set per destination with the help of route(8) and the -mtu modifier. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 08:21:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C68C1065675 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.bzerk.org [82.95.223.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E625F8FC0C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6V8N7cp057167; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6V8N5UH057166; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:05 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20080731082305.GA57069@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Roland Smith , Michael Christie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> <20080730232402.GA99013@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730232402.GA99013@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Michael Christie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Group Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:21:01 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:24:02AM +0200, Roland Smith typed: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:32:23AM +1000, Michael Christie wrote: > > Can any one advise me how to expand the number of groups allow on > > freebsd I think my default it is 16, I need to make it 50 to 100 > > The number 16 is from /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h. But my /etc/group > has 37 groups without problems. That's not the point. The limit is not on the total number of groups, but on the number of groups a user can be a member of. Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 08:51:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7A91065679 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (oldagora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E558B8FC1F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m6V8pdOP042157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m6V8pdQv042156; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18624; Thu, 31 Jul 08 01:42:35 PDT Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:43:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: keramida@freebsd.org Message-Id: <48917b1f.54tmBJTmI4AmAR7E%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> <489013b9.Pt7+7kznBXs3SSP+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <874p67xxlz.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <874p67xxlz.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:40 -0000 > You can edit `/etc/hostname.foo0' in the Sun too, and add > something like: > > 192.168.1.10/24 mtu 640 [getting OT for FreeBSD] Are you sure that works as far back as SunOS 4.1.1? /etc/hostname.le0 currently consists of the single word pluto and it looks as if this causes /etc/rc.boot to do ifconfig le0 pluto netmask + -trailers up (where the name pluto resolves to 192.168.200.1 via /etc/hosts). If I were to change /etc/hostname.le0 to pluto mtu 640 I think the ifconfig command would become ifconfig le0 pluto mtu 640 netmask + -trailers up and it doesn't look as if ifconfig recognizes mtu as a keyword (at least while running -- granted I haven't tried actually editing /etc/hostname.le0 and rebooting): # ifconfig le0 pluto mtu 640 ifconfig: mtu: bad address From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 09:09:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C211065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=a4N.Lv=YL=webzone.net.au=andrewd@smtp.webzone.net.au) Received: from smtp.webzone.net.au (smtp.webzone.net.au [210.8.36.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0B08FC19 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=a4N.Lv=YL=webzone.net.au=andrewd@smtp.webzone.net.au) Received: from ppp121-45-156-210.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net ([121.45.156.210] helo=[192.168.202.99]) by smtp.webzone.net.au with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KOTzl-000LB9-7N; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:28:49 +0930 Message-ID: <48917EC6.1080400@webzone.net.au> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:28:46 +0930 From: Andrew D User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AUTH-WEBZONE: andrewd@webzone.net.au successfully authed as username:andrewd Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:09:03 -0000 Andrew Falanga wrote: > Hi, > > I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to > receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3 > (I use dovecot). > > At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using > the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. > > As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see authid= > in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One of the pastor's told me > the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using Outlook, I'm not sure of > the version. What problems do people here usually encounter with Outlook > mail clients and their SMTP servers? > Have you even tried to get them to telnet to port 25, 465(for tls/ssl) to see what happens? If their ISP is blocking port 25 then you can get them to send their mail using port 465 (with TLS/SSL) or using the SMTP submission port which is on port 587. HTH cya Andrew > At this point, I'd just like to have some leads. Any ideas what might be > keeping them from sending? They can all log in and receive e-mail POP3. > > Thanks, > Andy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 09:31:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8981065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from hermes.wbtsystems.com (hermes.wbtsystems.com [193.120.231.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A958FC17 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from SUNYA (sunya.wbt.wbtsystems.com [10.12.1.114]) by hermes.wbtsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CFE70F741D; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:31:31 +0100 (IST) From: "Barry Byrne" To: "'Andrew Falanga'" , "'FreeBSD Questions'" References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:31:36 +0100 Message-ID: <000801c8f2f0$3a49ff60$72010c0a@wbt.wbtsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcjypYl5aw7oN+FBREqyu+rIyeWh6gASc4Ww X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: Subject: RE: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:31:34 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Andrew Falanga > I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that > folks are able to > receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently > configured for POP3 > (I use dovecot). > > At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts > of mine using > the church e-mail server and was successful. I used KMail for this. > > As I look through /var/log/maillog I do not even see > authid= > in the mail log (I'm using TLS with sendmail). One of the > pastor's told me > the error he's seeing is "timeout." They are using Outlook, > I'm not sure of > the version. What problems do people here usually encounter > with Outlook > mail clients and their SMTP servers? "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Andrew: I've seen a similar problem from time to time with Outlook 2003 clients. For seemingly no reason whatsoever, they give a timeout sending mail. Googling the error code throws up many with the same error and no solution that I've found. Telneting to port 25 or even running the Outlook test mail account feature still work, while Outlook comlains it can't send. The workaround is to quit Outlook and start again. By quitting Outlook, the user must choose 'exit' from the 'file' menu. Simply closing the close box still leaves Outlook in memory and the problem remains. The problem seems to happen perhaps once or twice a month for some users. Regards, Barry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 09:32:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E06B1065675 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from skapet.bsdly.net (cl-426.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:1a9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC828FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from thingy.bsdly.net ([10.168.103.11] helo=thingy.bsdly.net.bsdly.net ident=peter) by skapet.bsdly.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOUW3-0003YH-U8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:12 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: peter@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jack Raats's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:33:29 +0200") Message-ID: <87vdympffp.fsf@thingy.bsdly.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD based mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:19 -0000 "Jack Raats" writes: > I should add postgrey and clamsmtp. > Postgrey is a very good greylisting filter for postfix and clamsmtp I use Actually, doing the greylisting via spamd (the one that comes with PF) might be a better option (and it earns you the opportunity to do greytrapping for added bonus) - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 09:32:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3300106566C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753908FC26 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so610781rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:32:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g+So+0PXugwqA9SFkwbIfHEKWdrUvcsR4AQigAIBhC0=; b=STrJnrBnT9Xbt5ay07qDwDAXDqoNe73RsUCNEzCc1cDTr5cblVxNPkRdCgazpfCfUw DTJq/6z+Qpmp0KsIBdua87bGIfbDZGFCW5z9IUO+eH1/rVyU7MyLJWgpykTWlGpWJlVl NgqygO0+PnMLBd4wtR0m3l7DCgzgXbFNHKsyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e2/J8AdcaWvQSjLhmr4s/cSuOu7x+Kv9IuQBF/dEU+4oVj7s6sZLqkpC6J488OtdLo 0PVldeiQ43OZp9e0ailqRjy32A6MW5TJEM9W+l2NAG86X3b7UlDWKYMmOeSlQxeE0Cwc mcuApla15U93KTj0T+jmgnKGbaQM5VMXodWM8= Received: by 10.115.46.10 with SMTP id y10mr9814873waj.137.1217496751998; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [203.206.184.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k14sm3465626waf.29.2008.07.31.02.32.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489186A5.5040901@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:32:21 +1000 From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> <48910D00.4070100@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730212205.02530430@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730212205.02530430@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:32:32 -0000 Hello again, I apologise for not posting dmesg earlier. You will see I am booting off the RAID5 array for now, while I try to sort this out. Turns out aacd0 is not listed either :( Are there any clues here that I am not seeing? Thanks for all your help so far Dan Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600 @ 2.40GHz (2407.31-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fd Stepping = 13 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe39d AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 usable memory = 4280705024 (4082 MB) avail memory = 4079972352 (3890 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008 10:34:18) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7ff00000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 cpu0: on acpi0 ACPI Warning (tbutils-0243): Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - DC, should be CF [20070320] est0: on cpu0 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr c280c2806000c28 device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 est1: on cpu1 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr c280c2806000c28 device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 p4tcc1: on cpu1 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: mem 0xfd000000-0xfdffffff,0xc0000000-0xcfffffff,0xfc000000-0xfcffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 uhci0: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe080-0xe09f irq 17 at device 26.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfebff400-0xfebff7ff irq 18 at device 26.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 19 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pci3: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib4: irq 16 at device 28.4 on pci0 pci2: on pcib4 atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac07,0xa880-0xa883,0xa800-0xa807,0xa480-0xa483,0xa400-0xa40f mem 0xfe6fe000-0xfe6fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 atapci0: [ITHREAD] atapci0: AHCI called from vendor specific driver atapci0: AHCI Version 01.00 controller with 2 ports detected ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci0 ata4: [ITHREAD] uhci2: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci2 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xd880-0xd89f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb4: on uhci3 usb4: USB revision 1.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci4: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci4: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci4: [ITHREAD] usb5: on uhci4 usb5: USB revision 1.0 uhub5: on usb5 uhub5: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci1: mem 0xfebff000-0xfebff3ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci1: [ITHREAD] usb6: EHCI version 1.0 usb6: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb3 usb4 usb5 usb6: on ehci1 usb6: USB revision 2.0 uhub6: on usb6 uhub6: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered pcib5: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 ahd0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff,0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xfeafc000-0xfeafdfff irq 23 at device 2.0 on pci5 ahd0: [ITHREAD] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI 33 or 66Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0xc800-0xc8ff,0xc400-0xc4ff mem 0xfeafe000-0xfeafffff irq 20 at device 2.1 on pci5 ahd1: [ITHREAD] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI 33 or 66Mhz, 512 SCBs fwohci0: port 0xcc00-0xcc7f mem 0xfeafb800-0xfeafbfff irq 21 at device 3.0 on pci5 fwohci0: [FILTER] fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:d8:00:01:39:52:b8 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 dcons_crom0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x1178000 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:39:52:b8 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:d8:39:52:b8 fwip0: on firewire0 fwip0: Firewire address: 00:11:d8:00:01:39:52:b8 @ 0xfffe00000000, S400, maxrec 2048 sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe880-0xe883,0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe41f mem 0xfebff800-0xfebfffff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: [ITHREAD] atapci1: AHCI called from vendor specific driver atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected ata5: on atapci1 ata5: [ITHREAD] ata6: on atapci1 ata6: [ITHREAD] ata7: on atapci1 ata7: [ITHREAD] ata8: on atapci1 ata8: [ITHREAD] ata9: on atapci1 ata9: [ITHREAD] ata10: on atapci1 ata10: [ITHREAD] pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 ppbus0: [ITHREAD] plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: [ITHREAD] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] orm0: at iomem 0xd3800-0xd67ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 WARNING: ZFS is considered to be an experimental feature in FreeBSD. Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec hptrr: no controller detected.firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) ZFS filesystem version 6 ZFS storage pool version 6 acd0: DVDR at ata4-master UDMA33 ad10: 476940MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 476940MB at ata6-master SATA300 ad14: 476940MB at ata7-master SATA300 ad16: 476940MB at ata8-master SATA300 Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle ar0: 1430812MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY using ad10 at ata5-master ar0: disk1 READY using ad12 at ata6-master ar0: disk2 READY using ad14 at ata7-master ar0: disk3 READY using ad16 at ata8-master SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit) da0: Command Queueing Enabled da0: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit) da1: Command Queueing Enabled da1: 70007MB (143374744 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) Trying to mount root from zfs:tank/root From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 10:02:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4D61065683 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@powerzone.net.au) Received: from cinta.thebushtelegraph.com.au (christ58.lnk.telstra.net [165.228.0.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7478FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@powerzone.net.au) Received: (qmail 15959 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 20:02:56 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.10.8?) (michael@christie.org.au@10.10.10.8) by cinta.thebushtelegraph.com.au with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 20:02:56 +1000 Message-ID: <48918DDC.5010909@powerzone.net.au> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:03:08 +1000 From: Michael Christie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruben de Groot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> <20080730232402.GA99013@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080731082305.GA57069@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20080731082305.GA57069@ei.bzerk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Group Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:02:59 -0000 Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:24:02AM +0200, Roland Smith typed: > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:32:23AM +1000, Michael Christie wrote: >> > > >>> Can any one advise me how to expand the number of groups allow on >>> freebsd I think my default it is 16, I need to make it 50 to 100 >>> >> The number 16 is from /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h. But my /etc/group >> has 37 groups without problems. >> > > That's not the point. > The limit is not on the total number of groups, but on the number of > groups a user can be a member of. > > Ruben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > well if this is the case , is there a way of changing the number of groups a user can be a member of ? what i need is some advice on a work around for this, I have Google and there in not much. see below http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/webadmin-list/1/7087.html "Ok have do some hours of work since my last post and have discovered the following. When a virtual domain is created using virtualmin it creates a user and a group with the same name ie user name king1 and group king1. Then it adds the newly created group king1 to the www group which is fine see below. This is fine for awhile until to many groups are members of the www group and apache complains and will not start also see below. " Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 11:55:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44FF106567E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0FE8FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 820C8EBC0A; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:55:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:55:15 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Markus Mueller Message-Id: <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:55:18 -0000 In response to Markus Mueller : > I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. > How can I change the Name of this OS ? > I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of servers, which I connect by > sufing in the web and in application which locate the OS instead > "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" will be displayed. In addition to Giorgos' answer, there are tools, such as nmap, that identify the OS by it's behaviour and not by any string that appears anywhere. In order to convince those tools that your OS is not FreeBSD, you'll have to alter the IP code to cause it to behave in a manner that is unique. Good luck doing _that_ without breaking things. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 12:08:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279731065672 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E998FC23 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so233309ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:08:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=+q65uG3uCeKn3mDuMkXx842zOjz1W9WmQUEpBd0Rsq0=; b=txbpS/9daUx7j65soIsEPQ4xluTQJy6MrBzq0A9LofDqS4XJtkN/hSl7Skyvx2CCe6 fUtAY4vq2t27QeAV1OZnIWowidb5MsfCJjLAYnZFKpyYVKCF76nMDfcU8cKDRGLZ8WQC YsqmrfVbnxEIgV4y1szxDnEiF6E/7pJZgADMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=XlJ60VlSW03uzTOWpb8bvXqThPCLJDCHPrdlOJrIsqHNJtWzWIwfUojN082vcSFbDF i4iKQ0V64MROocpHp8Mcp3gk/IdGEnGmiklNsjdeCftegr9RXe1hGrm9QtcZJM078feV kr04Q5da8GbgSHUpeOsu3hNlswfLaS6Mwat3w= Received: by 10.150.97.19 with SMTP id u19mr1119442ybb.156.1217506109127; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dingo-laptop.localnet ( [124.157.244.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a38sm4452787rnc.11.2008.07.31.05.08.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:08:26 -0700 (PDT) From: OutBackDingo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:08:19 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.0 (Linux/2.6.24-19-generic; KDE/4.1.0; i686; ; ) References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807311908.19691.outbackdingo@gmail.com> Cc: Markus Mueller , Bill Moran Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:08:30 -0000 Take this advice very seriously from someone who has already done this effectively, you wount be able to accomplish this yourself, it will take months, and more then just a few good c coders to accomplish. its really a bad idea for what little you gain versus the amount of work involved. On Thursday 31 July 2008 18:55:15 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Markus Mueller : > > I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. > > How can I change the Name of this OS ? > > I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of servers, which I connect by > > sufing in the web and in application which locate the OS instead > > "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" will be displayed. > > In addition to Giorgos' answer, there are tools, such as nmap, that > identify the OS by it's behaviour and not by any string that appears > anywhere. In order to convince those tools that your OS is not > FreeBSD, you'll have to alter the IP code to cause it to behave in > a manner that is unique. Good luck doing _that_ without breaking > things. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 12:10:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5050C106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A678FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from broadpark.no ([80.202.4.61]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K4V00LANB251Y70@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.202.4.61] by osl1mux1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:10:53 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd=22?= To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:10:53 +0200 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit) Content-language: en X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Jails with multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:10:56 -0000 greetings! i have a freebsd server (mother=2Enaoshige=2Enet) running two jails=A0(= camel=2Enaoshige=2Enet and box=2Enaoshige=2Enet)=3A http=3A//pastie=2Eorg/244706 my question is=2C how do i give box=2Enaoshige=2Enet access to the rema= ining ipsof mother=2Enaoshige=2Enet (well=2C most of them)=3F do i just = move theifconfig aliases from mother=27s rc=2Econf to box=27s=3F thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 12:23:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABFB1065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AD48FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOXBd-000437-OM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:23:17 -0700 Message-ID: <18753406.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <18742235.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> <4890A25D.3060606@FreeBSD.org> <18742235.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 -0000 I'm now wondering why CPUTYPE=core2 is supposed to work in -current. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10783746.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-GSoC2007%3A-cnst-sensors.2007-08-20.patch-p12334133.html I'm particular interested in Penryn instructions support. Jakub Lach wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >> >> Jakub Lach wrote: >>> >>> >>> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>>> gcc43 as >>>>> base. >>>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>>> the GPLv3. >>> >>> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is >>> going to >>> be omitted? >> >> There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their >> decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. >> >>> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? >> >> The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc >> developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to >> provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has >> significant resources behind it (apple, etc). >> >> Kris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > Thank you very much for all answers. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18753406.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 12:34:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E411065677 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF48A8FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6VCYBKr026124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:34:18 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VCYBc8092723; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:34:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6VCY9oL092721; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:34:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <488fe865.x7NyNic2A5pcZPCL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <87ljzkdm3x.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hca8dlh3.fsf@kobe.laptop> <489013b9.Pt7+7kznBXs3SSP+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <874p67xxlz.fsf@kobe.laptop> <48917b1f.54tmBJTmI4AmAR7E%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:34:08 +0300 In-Reply-To: <48917b1f.54tmBJTmI4AmAR7E%perryh@pluto.rain.com> (perryh@pluto.rain.com's message of "Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:43:11 -0700") Message-ID: <87sktq44hr.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6VCYBKr026124 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.007, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting the other end's TCP segment size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:34:24 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:43:11 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> You can edit `/etc/hostname.foo0' in the Sun too, and add >> something like: >> >> 192.168.1.10/24 mtu 640 > > [getting OT for FreeBSD] > > Are you sure that works as far back as SunOS 4.1.1? Ah! That will not work, you are right. When I saw 'Sun' I assumed a relatively recent Solaris version. I didn't know you had SunOS 4.1.1 still around! :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:01:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8D81065674 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casparos@yahoo.de) Received: from n4a.bullet.tw1.yahoo.com (n4a.bullet.tw1.yahoo.com [119.160.244.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7E468FC37 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casparos@yahoo.de) Received: from [119.160.244.76] by n4.bullet.tw1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 Received: from [202.43.196.225] by t1.bullet.tw1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 Received: from [217.12.4.215] by t2.bullet.tpe.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.119] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp224.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 188068.44863.bm@omp224.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 86534 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rgGyvOPu1FHipPQiP8QSw6PI5izO8M3U7n47sIgvkgZi/k3AV6x43oIwLE2tg+LyBhIQ+Vb9TUQfKjeOOq8AnLWpoKqZsTIgC4BD9YmlSrwxwqsyvhiCWEDa5+rIivc3EHzbAkBWYJfUzr5x1j0mIGWgY2BvOmhTI95CR6B4Ul4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.220.100?) (casparos@yahoo.de@77.134.50.226 with plain) by smtp107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 12:48:30 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: asJFIj8VM1kAT.okFTNGhtnWP_SdzYEHYRb2W_2iFXK0VBQPZyEnhQFgch4kSDDhj3oZuYgrh5dRuAcQeeWjqa_a27ODRGssenrKjlTCuA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:48:14 +0200 From: Markus Mueller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:01:25 -0000 Bill Moran schrieb: > In response to Markus Mueller : > > >> I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. >> How can I change the Name of this OS ? >> I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of servers, which I connect by >> sufing in the web and in application which locate the OS instead >> "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" will be displayed. >> > > In addition to Giorgos' answer, there are tools, such as nmap, that > identify the OS by it's behaviour and not by any string that appears > anywhere. In order to convince those tools that your OS is not > FreeBSD, you'll have to alter the IP code to cause it to behave in > a manner that is unique. Good luck doing _that_ without breaking > things. > > the command "uname" must get these information from a file. in which file are these informations ? i can editing this file simply with my own informations and my "OS" based on FREEBSD. this can be the solution of my problem. ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:09:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9287F1065682 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6F8FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VC9LM8009813 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6VC9Lkh009812 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2008 12:09:21.0422 (UTC) FILETIME=[43E0D2E0:01C8F306] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2008_07_31_14_09_22 Subject: "no toe capability on..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:09:36 -0000 Hi, Today I updated kernel & system on one of my machines (FreeBSD 7.0). After the update which ran absolutely smooth I'm seeing spurious messages both on the console and in /var/log/messages like the following: no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 Grep-ing through the sources I found the above message to come from /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c. As far as I understand this has something to do with TcpOffloadEngine. Please note that this is a box several years old (2GHz P4) with three Intel FXP FastEthernet-cards. So here are my questions: o) Has anybody else seen the above messages? o) Can they safely be ignored? o) If not - what can I do to get rid of them? Thanks much in advance for any clue, -ewald PS: I'm enclosing the output of dmesg below ------------------------------ < Cut here > ------------------------------ Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Thu Jul 31 12:49:30 CEST 2008 root@box1.mydomain.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OeKB-SNIFF Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz (1994.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4400 real memory = 528416768 (503 MB) avail memory = 503144448 (479 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 8 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 1f700000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xf808-0xf80b on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 vgapci0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff,0xfc700000-0xfc77ffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 agp0: on vgapci0 agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 128M uhci0: port 0x2440-0x245f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x2460-0x247f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfc780000-0xfc7803ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: wrong number of companions (3 != 2) usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib1 fxp0: port 0x1040-0x105f mem 0xfcc00000-0xfcc00fff,0xfc400000-0xfc4fffff irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci5 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:c9:9f:20:57 fxp0: [ITHREAD] fxp1: port 0x1000-0x103f mem 0xfc600000-0xfc600fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci5 miibus1: on fxp1 inphy1: PHY 1 on miibus1 inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp1: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:21:c6:c7 fxp1: [ITHREAD] fxp2: port 0x1060-0x107f mem 0xfcc01000-0xfcc01fff,0xfc500000-0xfc5fffff irq 18 at device 9.0 on pci5 miibus2: on fxp2 inphy2: PHY 1 on miibus2 inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp2: Ethernet address: 00:a0:c9:b2:e9:bc fxp2: [ITHREAD] isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x24a0-0x24af irq 18 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] pcm0: port 0x2000-0x20ff,0x2400-0x243f mem 0xfc780400-0xfc7805ff,0xfc780600-0xfc7806ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: [ITHREAD] pcm0: cpu0: on acpi0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0: port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio0: [FILTER] sio1: port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A sio1: [FILTER] fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/13 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 ppbus0: [ITHREAD] ppi0: on ppbus0 plip0: on ppbus0 plip0: WARNING: using obsoleted IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: [ITHREAD] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1994124300 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA40 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:13:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03C41065680 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DF98FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from pustefix161.kundenserver.de (pustefix161.kundenserver.de [172.23.4.28]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1KOXyG2Tuw-0000bc; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:32 +0200 Message-Id: <19220665.288381217510012583.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> From: me@janh.de To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Binford: 6100 (more power) X-Mailer: Webmail X-Originating-From: 34464795 X-Routing: DE X-Message-Id: <34464795$1217510012535172.23.4.289036218@pustefix161.kundenserver.de--433651826> X-Received: from pustefix161.kundenserver.de by 78.54.99.104 with HTTP id 34464795 for [freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:32 CEST Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:32 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18p1E0k2b/jU8MYQE9JS0fFDesEb59k0cIOdZu LQWzFjAzqkn/aPerlA4F3o+Ubi59h4ayvRq5ddWLofmTigmrN5 E+h7A4edD5hwCwBIP1Hsg== Subject: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:13:36 -0000 Yesterday, I wrote about "CANNOT READ BLK" from my new hd that I filled via firewire: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-July/179646.html The response suggested to check for faulty hardware, which I am still trying to do. I found FreeBSD reporting the drive to have 128GB instead of 232GB as FreeBSD did when the drive was connected via firewire. Searching the web, I found one reference of someone else having problems with >128/137GB using the same (latest) bios on this five year old (Centrino) laptop (Acer TM800). >From Western Digital, I got "Lifeguard", which installed ddo (dynamic drive overlay). With ddo, FreeBSD can access the full drive. Unfortunately, I need to dual boot Windows XP, which seems to be impossible with the ddo MBR. Anyhow, both Linux (Knoppix, 2.6.24) and Windows XP (SP3) can access the whole drive without ddo. With Linux, I checked that I can indeed write and read high sectors. Thus, it is only the bios, not the controller that is limiting lba48 access. (At least with the geometry the disk reports.) Is there any way to have FreeBSD access the whole drive without ddo, too? If that is not possible, can you think of any way to load ddo only for FreeBSD, but have Windows XP started with a "regular" MBR? I am not sure, why the ddo MBR does not boot Windows XP, but since Windows XP does not need it and ddo is not supported in dual boot environments, I guess I cannot complain. Thanks a lot for any hint, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:27:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0AA106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A509D8FC1B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (i223105.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.125.223.105]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B4B5F74D; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:09:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:09:53 +0900 From: WATANABE Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Rommel Martinez Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:27:20 -0000 Hello. At Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:50:50 +0800, Rommel Martinez wrote: > I'm wondering why is it that no matter what I do, I can't seem to make > my laptop emit sound lounder than a whisper. The laptop is an ECS > Elitegroup W330 (Arima W330-UCX) and this is the website of the > laptop: http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=145 > > I thought at first there was no sound coming out at all, so what I did was I > plugged an external speaker to it and maxed out the volume via the > volume knob and set my mixer settings all to 100, then I was able to > hear sound from the speaker, but it's too weak to be of any good use. > > The following is my configuration: > > $ cat /boot/loader.conf | grep snd_ > snd_ich_load="YES" > > $ kldstat | grep snd_ > 3 1 0xc0d30000 6f88 snd_ich.ko > > $ kldstat | grep sound > 4 2 0xc0d37000 4a5ac sound.ko > > $ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep pcm > pcm0: port 0x5000-0x50ff,0x48c0-0x48ff mem > 0xb0040800-0xb00409ff,0xb0040400-0xb00404ff irq 20 at device 30.2 on > pci0 > pcm0: [ITHREAD] > pcm0: > > $ cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2007061600/i386) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0xb0040800, 0xb0040400 irq 20 bufsz > 16384 kld snd_ich [MPSAFE] (1p:1v/1r:1v channels duplex default) > > $ mixer > Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer line is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer cd is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer igain is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer line1 is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer phin is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer phout is currently set to 100:100 > Recording source: mic > > I tried audacious, xmms, and mpg123 but I still get > the same behaviour. > > What's causing this? Can anybody give pointers why > is this happening? > > Thanks. Can you show me the output of "pciconf -lv | grep -A4 ^pcm" ? --- WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:28:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD341065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4AA8FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl151-101.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.242.101]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m6VDKsk7030987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:21:03 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VDKruk093953; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6VDKpEJ093952; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Markus Mueller References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:49 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> (Markus Mueller's message of "Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:48:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87k5f242by.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m6VDKsk7030987 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.006, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:28:32 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:48:14 +0200, Markus Mueller wrote: > Bill Moran schrieb: >> In response to Markus Mueller : >>> I will create my own *BSD OS based on FreeBSD. How can I change the >>> Name of this OS ? I mean, that in Logfiles, for example, of >>> servers, which I connect by sufing in the web and in application >>> which locate the OS instead "FREEBSD" an another OS-Name "MyOS-Name" >>> will be displayed. >> >> In addition to Giorgos' answer, there are tools, such as nmap, that >> identify the OS by it's behaviour and not by any string that appears >> anywhere. In order to convince those tools that your OS is not >> FreeBSD, you'll have to alter the IP code to cause it to behave in a >> manner that is unique. Good luck doing _that_ without breaking >> things. > > the command "uname" must get these information from a file. in which > file are these informations ? i can editing this file simply with my > own informations and my "OS" based on FREEBSD. this can be the > solution of my problem. Hi Markus, That's slightly touching just the tip of the iceberg. See what Bill wrote about 'OS fingerprinting' above. If you just want to change the uname output, then all you need is to edit one file: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh The resulting 'OS' is hardly different from 'FreeBSD' though, so you will soon want to change stuff like the boot loader: # pwd /usr/src/sys/boot # fgrep -ir '"FreeBSD' . ./common/interp_forth.c: ficlSetEnv(bf_sys, "FreeBSD_version", __FreeBSD_version); ./common/newvers.sh:echo "char bootprog_name[] = \"FreeBSD/${3} ${2}\";" > vers.c ./i386/libfirewire/firewire.c: crom_add_simple_text(src, root, &buf->vendor, "FreeBSD Project"); ./i386/libfirewire/firewire.c: crom_add_simple_text(src, &buf->unit, &buf->spec, "FreeBSD"); ./ia64/ski/efi_stub.c: L"FreeBSD", 0, 0, ./ia64/ski/sal_stub.c: "FreeBSD", # the __FreeBSD_version magic in sys/param.h: # pwd /usr/src/sys/sys # fgrep __FreeBSD_version param.h * __FreeBSD_version numbers are documented in the Porter's Handbook. #undef __FreeBSD_version #define __FreeBSD_version 800040 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ # the system variables in the default make(1) includes: # pwd /usr/share/mk # expand sys.mk | grep 'FreeBSD[ ]*?=' .FreeBSD ?= true # and the list goes on for a while. Even if you _do_ change *all* the strings that say "FreeBSD" to something else, you still haven't done anything to change the OS fingerprint, and you already have a stack of patches that needs "maintenance", or "forward porting" as FreeBSD releases new patches, new versions and moves on. _That_ is what I meant when I wrote that it's non trivial :) It's certainly possible. The OpenBSD team did this when they split off NetBSD. The Dragonfly BSD folks have done it already when they branched from FreeBSD 4.X. So you can definitely do it. But you should probably understand a lot about the way the system works before doing that, and changing just the "uname" output is not enough. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 13:39:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92691065683 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9628F8FC17 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 29733 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 08:39:44 -0500 Received: from 203-166-248-146.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (203.166.248.146) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 08:39:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:37 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Michael Christie Message-ID: <20080731233937.66d710af@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> References: <4890DDE7.9090102@powerzone.net.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Group Limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:42 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:32:23 +1000 Michael Christie wrote: > I am running webmin and virtualmin on freebsd 7.0, I have found when > i add a number of domains using virtualmin and restart apachie i get the > following error. > > [alert] (22)Invalid argument: initgroups: unable to set groups for User > www and Group 80... Apachie will not start.. > > > it happens when the 'apache' or 'httpd' user is a member of too many groups. By default, > Virtualmin adds the user Apache runs as to each domain's group, which > eventually triggers this problem. so is the dummy spit by apache itself, or a syscall made by apache ? u can use ktrace on apache when starting/dying and see what is causing the actual problem. IF the issue really is central to /etc/groups , would moving to a bigger user management system (LDAP, NIS ? ) be possible? ( possibly implies changes to virtualmin too..) B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Real Programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand and even harder to modify. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:06:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F581065670 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from flpi102.prodigy.net (flpi102.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED46A8FC1C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from nawcoms-macbook.local (adsl-68-252-71-82.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.252.71.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by flpi102.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VDs9qq006245 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:54:15 -0700 Message-ID: <48918BA0.9060104@nawcom.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:53:36 +0000 From: nawcom User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:06:31 -0000 Perhaps this will help you out with the situation; this is from a previous post. I know for sure your audio chip's device/vendor id is 0x266e8086. This is a fix for someone with FreeBSD-6.2; even though the person suggests to grab the compiled modules, he also has the sources there. This person had the same issues with volume, and this fixed the problem. I hope this helps. -nawcom " :30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x099c103c chip=0x266e8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801FB/FR/FW/FRW AC '97 Audio Controller' class = multimedia subclass = audio Ok. Lets make it quick and simple. Grab both (I repeat: BOTH) sound.ko and snd_ich.ko from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/test/ . Let me guess. mixer "phout" and "ogain" control both \ headphone and speaker separately, while mixer "vol" seems useless. Prove me wrong. -- Ariff Abdullah FreeBSD " --------------------------------------------- WATANABE Kazuhiro wrote: > Hello. > > At Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:50:50 +0800, > Rommel Martinez wrote: > >> I'm wondering why is it that no matter what I do, I can't seem to make >> my laptop emit sound lounder than a whisper. The laptop is an ECS >> Elitegroup W330 (Arima W330-UCX) and this is the website of the >> laptop: http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=145 >> >> I thought at first there was no sound coming out at all, so what I did was I >> plugged an external speaker to it and maxed out the volume via the >> volume knob and set my mixer settings all to 100, then I was able to >> hear sound from the speaker, but it's too weak to be of any good use. >> >> The following is my configuration: >> >> $ cat /boot/loader.conf | grep snd_ >> snd_ich_load="YES" >> >> $ kldstat | grep snd_ >> 3 1 0xc0d30000 6f88 snd_ich.ko >> >> $ kldstat | grep sound >> 4 2 0xc0d37000 4a5ac sound.ko >> >> $ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep pcm >> pcm0: port 0x5000-0x50ff,0x48c0-0x48ff mem >> 0xb0040800-0xb00409ff,0xb0040400-0xb00404ff irq 20 at device 30.2 on >> pci0 >> pcm0: [ITHREAD] >> pcm0: >> >> $ cat /dev/sndstat >> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2007061600/i386) >> Installed devices: >> pcm0: at io 0xb0040800, 0xb0040400 irq 20 bufsz >> 16384 kld snd_ich [MPSAFE] (1p:1v/1r:1v channels duplex default) >> >> $ mixer >> Mixer vol is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer pcm is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer line is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer mic is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer cd is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer igain is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer line1 is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer phin is currently set to 100:100 >> Mixer phout is currently set to 100:100 >> Recording source: mic >> >> I tried audacious, xmms, and mpg123 but I still get >> the same behaviour. >> >> What's causing this? Can anybody give pointers why >> is this happening? >> >> Thanks. >> > > Can you show me the output of "pciconf -lv | grep -A4 ^pcm" ? > --- > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:19:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9018A1065689 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DC08FC22 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.250.23]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VEKkHu067667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VEJPjV049663; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:19:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4891C9E4.8060903@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:19:16 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: valgrind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:27 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > Read http://valgrind.org/info/platforms.html, especially 'Porting Plans'. I had read this, but it dates back to Feb 2007; I just hoped it was obsolete :-( > Or remove the line 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386' from the port Makefile, try it > and see where it breaks. :-) I'm guessing it need some support code in > the OS. That was more my question. There must be some OS support which FreeBSD i386 has and FreeBSD amd64 has not. It was just curiosity, though. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:42:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD501065676 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30408FC1A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so462503wfg.7 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.32.7 with SMTP id k7mr3283700wfj.305.1217515359051; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.158.15 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:42:39 -0300 From: "Joey Mingrone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: (math related) fonts in www/firefox-2.0.0.14_1,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:42:39 -0000 Hi, I'm having some trouble getting firefox to display certain (math related) fonts. For example, the page for the Poisson distribution at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution) uses, what I believe is, a lambba character (sentence with the pmf), but it shows up like this for me: http://jrm.ath.cx/misc/firefox_math_fonts.png. I've installed x11-fonts/mathfonts-4.1_5 and it seems to be working well based on my results at http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/. Is there anything else I'm missing? Thanks for any tips, Joey Mingrone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:47:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226DC106568D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modelnine@modelnine.org) Received: from jord.modelnine.org (jord.modelnine.org [83.246.72.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF8A8FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modelnine@modelnine.org) Received: from [192.168.1.37] (a89-182-210-48.net-htp.de [89.182.210.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: modelnine) by jord.modelnine.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8241A40CC0 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:27:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Wundram To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:31:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> <4891C9E4.8060903@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4891C9E4.8060903@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807311631.31067.modelnine@modelnine.org> Subject: Re: valgrind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:47:17 -0000 Am Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2008 16:19:16 schrieb Andrea Venturoli: > > Or remove the line 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386' from the port Makefile, try it > > and see where it breaks. :-) I'm guessing it need some support code in > > the OS. > > That was more my question. There must be some OS support which FreeBSD > i386 has and FreeBSD amd64 has not. It was just curiosity, though. AFAIK it's not about OS-support for valgrind being required (but there is a module for freebsd which speeds up valgrind considerably), but about syscall-support. valgrind has/requires wrappers for all _possible_ syscalls to be able to implement it's memory-checker and some other functionality, and that table of callbacks and the callbacks themselves simply aren't implemented for amd64 (which has different syscalls/syscall parameters than i386). A porting effort is under way, as far as I recall a discussion on freebsd-hackers I had for a similar reason (the current valgrind that's in ports won't run on any 7.x, because the syscalls changed/were extended somewhat from the 6.x-series, and the table hasn't been adapted correspondingly), but the last time I pulled that porting effort (which is now about two months ago) and compiled it, valgrind was pretty much useless for me (even though it runs), because it couldn't deal with threads (i.e., the syscalls responsible for thread creation/management). Just check in the archives of freebsd-hackers, possibly what's currently present (someone did a tarball) is enough for your purposes. But, YMMV. -- Heiko Wundram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:53:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124351065684 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9C58FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so707759fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=CFHhFPBIyZfe5fU7Jh4psIsmY71PnljKl3qqqbH8Dp0=; b=DyKdMOEXe0vGKr1X0lu4Tnb6+ZZpHqBX3LBjEJ534QEvDTHIZrssdXrcjd5ghnQ5Xl Q9VT4vSvkpwz+ceGCIcJ7EP5iSri23XuwEGUWgU5nPfx2zFyj4kAr7UAcBQUd6hA9Vxo 5s04ktTSZxvm+SZY1+m8Dg9Y2ZBLxtm50+cXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fQLosDfCMjHZU227O5oXXoNA3ndJoGFI2nixCAgvAWSFhTV3F63NJP918CnN0rL3Bk Rv/+exQgPDL9SNQx9nARxGg0X3covG8qzRvkx9y3BccH1dQUfNbWJCjNdz2ifyFnhOVS On3LmmYCfKQkGXFSFX/8/KCGuh1XbQ4A1KV7g= Received: by 10.187.171.8 with SMTP id y8mr186906fao.62.1217516030257; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807310753j3a406977lf85f18eb63c077c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:53:50 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:53:52 -0000 > Perhaps this will help you out with the situation; this is from a > previous post. I know for sure your audio chip's device/vendor id is > 0x266e8086. This is a fix for someone with FreeBSD-6.2; even though the > person suggests to grab the compiled modules, he also has the sources > there. This person had the same issues with volume, and this fixed the > problem. I hope this helps. > > -nawcom > > " :30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x099c103c chip=0x266e8086 > rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801FB/FR/FW/FRW AC '97 Audio Controller' > class = multimedia > subclass = audio > > Ok. Lets make it quick and simple. Grab both (I repeat: BOTH) sound.ko > and snd_ich.ko from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/test/ . > > Let me guess. mixer "phout" and "ogain" control both \ > headphone and > speaker separately, while mixer "vol" seems useless. Prove me wrong. > > > > -- > Ariff Abdullah > FreeBSD > I did that and I got a kernel panic. With the following on the console: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KLD file sound.ko - could not finalize loading Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0xf00de2cf fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0741063 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc1020d20 frame pointer = 0x28:0xc1020d6c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x13 = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, 10PL = 0 current process = 0 () trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I restored the original sound.ko snd_ich.ko to be able to use the system. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:02:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178BD1065675 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7328FC1A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so711854fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=TqfxNxfGgIsEZ3FO8iA8zBJOjGo30ySd5EHV9Xwfj7U=; b=Ejx7vGUUK9qume6QpmbD3BdXGEjvHY+vVbYsGzFLaKLlKduNb+WK3/yiCl4kWiaMpv xXrsGMSknhgqlfLU22lOP3ZtuTR645o0IvWrpWmry5jCT9vxTdm79AV0vp1QGGRpfUo+ OHeWzgJqY8uIXvXvDPRjNcILXuwh2Y4TwENa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=IRyoBElKA7QaCotr8mT3W8rqA+sUdBEkPG2rwBZnSQ9hQvKI54/0PvrqkWRIMTiqhi 15YQVXwf/aOJ6cyl17im7NIE02uOmRq8kBEpuN2qI0nRE56YBQt7kdXR1OUSZ7bCmId2 NsLi1WLAGnIH3+hbWTHz4k0kOGwHdlkB+0Dbg= Received: by 10.187.203.4 with SMTP id f4mr184832faq.1.1217516555524; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807310802i60f26e2cy83e1f24775b40f6a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:02:35 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2DA75495B878AB3A455433E2@utd65257.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807310753j3a406977lf85f18eb63c077c3@mail.gmail.com> <2DA75495B878AB3A455433E2@utd65257.utdallas.edu> Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:37 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > What tool did you use to capture that panic? Pen and paper. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:03:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD717106566C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F018FC33 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.237.85] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOZgG-000Ljl-UK; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:03:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4891D428.2040508@ccstores.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:03:04 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (85) Subject: upgrade from MySQL 41 to MySQL 51 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:03:05 -0000 I de-installed mysql41-client / scripts / server from my FreeBSD 7.0 system, and attempted to make and install MySQL51, and I have encountered the following error. It appears that an empty field has defined mysql-client EVEN THO I have installed mysql51-client without mishap. Is there a fix for this? Thanks! Script started on Thu Jul 31 07:50:28 2008 server1# make Unknown suffix '@' used for variable 'port' (value '@MYSQL_TCP_PORT@') /usr/local/bin/mysql: Error while setting value '@MYSQL_TCP_PORT@' to 'port' ===> mysql-scripts-5.1.26 cannot install: MySQL versions mismatch: mysql-client is installed and wanted version is mysql51-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql51-scripts. Script done on Thu Jul 31 07:50:33 2008 -- Jim Pazarena fquest@ccstores.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:07:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70E71065694 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ketanisonline@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881A48FC5B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ketanisonline@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so851101ana.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:07:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=gA6UXLEhX5AUSH66dkFNLkYhB3k+pW0uZ3qE7t6p+tI=; b=YN0zRoj4L0KxyEypSiaUBndaM4XqxB7UZIp8e2Me7tYZtFy3MHL01mnvq0Mr1l59dI H+1i8X1UjdkIP1qPOiPeb5dwbbIdbkliJIEPUtcoPtZ4zOigqsHbZYlOH8xEUKT7YMvI Luwdkl8AUCfR3TdOedIjaBhqLr0x5KGTtg6A4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=QZktmpCAcWJ10APfRKkoYV5VRxRyiCsVjeC+vWqSqOjaxC0a4s8rJX+nPwpLbLNCyO GfjLlcsPSAY4MxKbcG9d0BzzCoW9uvNlU4w+zbRRorQo2ugEQtFNRj/KUlW8vHEpnRDf 4O46s7kdwM7Q+Ccr2Bzo/WLB+jQ8MOzxzY+Zs= Received: by 10.100.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr14856080and.141.1217515387291; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.124.4 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700 From: "ketan tada" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:07:51 -0000 Hello I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement? I have laptop(celeron 1.4, 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson is suitable for my hardware. Thanks and Regards, Ketan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:13:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B341065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783CE8FC0C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VFDTbn010881; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:13:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6VFDTtL010878; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:13:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:13:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ewald Jenisch In-Reply-To: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> Message-ID: References: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:13:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "no toe capability on..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Today I updated kernel & system on one of my machines (FreeBSD > 7.0). After the update which ran absolutely smooth I'm seeing spurious > messages both on the console and in /var/log/messages like the > following: > > no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 > > > Grep-ing through the sources I found the above message to come from > /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c. As far as I understand this has > something to do with TcpOffloadEngine. > > Please note that this is a box several years old (2GHz P4) with three > Intel FXP FastEthernet-cards. > > So here are my questions: > > o) Has anybody else seen the above messages? Yes, same here on a VIA motherboard with a vr interface. > o) Can they safely be ignored? Looks like it. They're debug messages that shouldn't still be in there. They were removed in version 1.2 but then reappeared in 1.4.2.1: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.diff?r1=1.1;r2=1.2 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.diff?r1=1.4;r2=1.4.2.1 Thanks for locating the source of the problem. I entered a PR (#126138) but forgot to put in a pointer to your message--and now can't, since the PR database claims #126138 doesn't exist. I'll try again later. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:13:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF802106567B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s37.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s37.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0B28FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY126-W38 ([65.55.131.73]) by bay0-omc2-s37.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:13:30 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [204.249.77.1] From: Sean Cavanaugh To: ketan tada , Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:13:30 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> References: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2008 15:13:30.0428 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD9957C0:01C8F31F] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:13:31 -0000 > Date: Thu=2C 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700 > From: ketanisonline@gmail.com > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > CC:=20 > Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. >=20 > Hello >=20 > I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 > but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requiremen= t? > I have laptop(celeron 1.4=2C 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson = is > suitable for my hardware. >=20 > Thanks and Regards=2C > Ketan. > _______________________________________________ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/hardware.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:16:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA4A106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C3B8FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so665133fgb.35 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0BobHkz9FlU4ha6BUjrRGv/YNN/BUWKZc8Na4UZ9UZQ=; b=CF9OgKEC77UEZRRjO+gjI2jExeCmny0MhWNLGwZtP/LAZBDpihoF5gf6b9H6t+LN3v 3sw38C4GnBVxOeIsTUJDuBa1R61A3bf7nEh4V0bRtev7qDd34jdDVywvrYYdBARLgjmN aejHMNJYVhqIynlCn1DBNZ6PJy50CnPOfXicw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hLBsOAChuqyQHkqbMMtPwIktJo+S9Hv4fDruzToFZk7zpdbF6+YGluZzhma4J7mz8Y ox1cQwo8ALTDfTIRZrtgbW+R3tTUSscYomkG2YnjHm9182Ce34LS+8YS/JOkjYpyFh+K Hl4aRU3TxbEevSvLyK4JfmMsjo1Euf9pLcwtY= Received: by 10.86.57.9 with SMTP id f9mr6196655fga.66.1217517391567; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joshua.freebsdgr.org ( [79.129.169.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm2996927fge.3.2008.07.31.08.16.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4891D74C.1030103@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:16:28 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ketan tada References: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:16:33 -0000 ketan tada wrote: > Hello > > I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 > but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement? > I have laptop(celeron 1.4, 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson is > suitable for my hardware. > > Thanks and Regards, > Ketan. > You need the i386 version. The hardware notes are here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/hardware.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:35:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2841065679 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C6E8FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (i223105.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.125.223.105]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8081A5ECA0; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:35:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:35:06 +0900 From: WATANABE Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <391934950807310649g61591bdfu9aa543a271a2b44a@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310755re04cba5sdf11a34695a17807@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Rommel Martinez Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:07 -0000 At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0800, Rommel Martinez wrote: > pcm0@pci0:0:30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x2047161f chip=0x266e8086 > rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Intel Corporation 82830M/MG SDRAM Controller / Ho > AC '97 Audio Controller/ Sigmatel (SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio)' > class = multimedia > subclass = audio OK. How about this patch? --- sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c.releng70 2007-12-15 13:06:52.000000000 +0900 +++ sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c 2008-08-01 00:10:04.000000000 +0900 @@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ ich_pci_attach(device_t dev) switch (subdev) { case 0x202f161f: /* Gateway 7326GZ */ case 0x203a161f: /* Gateway 4028GZ */ + case 0x2047161f: /* Arima W330-UCX */ case 0x204c161f: /* Kvazar-Micro Senator 3592XT */ case 0x8144104d: /* Sony VAIO PCG-TR* */ case 0x8197104d: /* Sony S1XP */ --- WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:37:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD521065740 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akulatraxas@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93E98FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akulatraxas@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so735393wra.27 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:37:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ym8sr6ERVchQ0fiNngTkfxbvby4nkCgq+IDw92iGiNE=; b=I0KbaC6c5UXdU9pzec67J4dFfpKGNINTgDdJ9dDUeqKgmWBiWr2a9vH/8p9z112b/H kLPbD2C9wgRqmV6zhyMfEBQQRUp2J0QG3ZReiUBpYlRoY/6vkuvwQsf12yc4coDGq1SR 8JziUtFWnx5Jv4+d3RgnNXS/UWiW8faFo+fM0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=jQ3Gzic1ifQ7PNgmWESFfUnLqp2vXnO/xYdTQS0/62rPd5E7L1VHpICAWCgo1JbM5s hSDWL3hc9dR9qmhLatIGL5cvAf8YhuxYsavuK6B4V5RX0ermd58eXqu2+Z9gbOsRJFDq AUCQkOab2/YlrlJ4tce/36VAuGgAw0B+PfV4E= Received: by 10.100.212.6 with SMTP id k6mr14885582ang.142.1217516999687; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.109.6 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35e5bf980807310809w63a53ac1mcac343b52a9ccfdd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:09:59 -0300 From: "Daniel de Oliveira" To: "ketan tada" In-Reply-To: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <181579f50807310743q4ef05e22r3ef817b69225a407@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:37:13 -0000 Im using 7.0 on my Dell Latitude C400 and works very fine (Pentium3 1.2, 256 ram). Sure, because I'm sometimes paranoic about performane even with slow machines, I'm using xfce. On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:43, ketan tada wrote: > Hello > > I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 > but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement? > I have laptop(celeron 1.4, 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson is > suitable for my hardware. > > Thanks and Regards, > Ketan. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Daniel de Oliveira ---- Network and System Analyst Security Specialist IBM RISC Specialist IBM Storage Specialist Linux/Unix Specialist Linux User #: 405334 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:41:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E421C1065687 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FEA8FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so730491fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9wbC0DKJZBbXSUtzx3xEsTaTZTfNGKGcwJisZYvHO/w=; b=xgn7Cgc/bhK/XnqM3FyehDMW6cmYTQAm+x9Y+aIt//EEc47hJ6HidXRjHEF6q76DRE tq3ZzE+lLkgDu+9uR/ohp0BKKQAr14ld+J15cCbwwZTCnpuHhtBEBA2g/lAZkzCRR8dN FUkiKU34HhE0qmFeH0kPW8XA7VIbENUbp97Kc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=XOcnnloVHust6pCnrFF1ntreyInU7pLqe1MkPKAAFimTOiQIggTWHBlxk8nulK4y2I qzKjT0Jc+vTuV4QB5E056XfRaa3wJW04YMx5qgB11FffOopFzldJ/R3zi0CZPasNs/bT 8BOtnLnacs23t6blB8+dAr1GzopBXpAXZo0w4= Received: by 10.187.208.18 with SMTP id k18mr185366faq.33.1217518916262; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807310841r50d04228l22d4239e9cbc7498@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:41:56 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310649g61591bdfu9aa543a271a2b44a@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310755re04cba5sdf11a34695a17807@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:41:58 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:35 PM, WATANABE Kazuhiro wrote: > At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0800, > Rommel Martinez wrote: >> pcm0@pci0:0:30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x2047161f chip=0x266e8086 >> rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> device = 'Intel Corporation 82830M/MG SDRAM Controller / Ho >> AC '97 Audio Controller/ Sigmatel (SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio)' >> class = multimedia >> subclass = audio > > OK. How about this patch? > > --- sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c.releng70 2007-12-15 13:06:52.000000000 +0900 > +++ sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c 2008-08-01 00:10:04.000000000 +0900 > @@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ ich_pci_attach(device_t dev) > switch (subdev) { > case 0x202f161f: /* Gateway 7326GZ */ > case 0x203a161f: /* Gateway 4028GZ */ > + case 0x2047161f: /* Arima W330-UCX */ > case 0x204c161f: /* Kvazar-Micro Senator 3592XT */ > case 0x8144104d: /* Sony VAIO PCG-TR* */ > case 0x8197104d: /* Sony S1XP */ > > --- > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) > OK. Is there a way to make those changes to my system without having to rebuild world or I really need to? -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 15:53:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2FA1065676 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E7D8FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so798885rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wNwTmGty6F6UzK+EnMWOT8RtIMYddkHHJeu5dwMwv7Y=; b=KAFFLceAAu0LKaLPxGMAlHY97f9lVWilqMYANjuLEJoZ+6ZMjYnPiwfu4LEHyFaErg hzcdDvuHAYpnvV4c6wnJN/ieLHfajutbd/vNKxpqC+kD5VGz1y5frliC5wXops2CZCuo BE0QIfuDylZ1NjA033mR62K1nmIt4hCCf+xs8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=rioUYXTiCxxkkbrWysbBFm4lW7gLl7n7kAX4a54ee82YvaDrKaiRkALZrOJpZX4JfH xG8yKIXeyouKr6K7RjB9OTXgKMdJdOJxupSpp7xgHXze36y4EQDMSouJypf+FgbIm9Vj tVDXRsKL6WPSY3L4Uv2urC0raCLKZBBtk/4DY= Received: by 10.140.126.14 with SMTP id y14mr5388792rvc.96.1217519617815; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.135.3 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54db43990807310853r4c9abf97pfed4296180d348d9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:53:37 -0400 From: "Bob Johnson" To: me@janh.de In-Reply-To: <19220665.288381217510012583.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <19220665.288381217510012583.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:53:38 -0000 On 7/31/08, me@janh.de wrote: > Yesterday, I wrote about "CANNOT READ BLK" from my new hd that I > filled via firewire: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-July/179646.html > The response suggested to check for faulty hardware, which I am still > trying to do. > > I found FreeBSD reporting the drive to have 128GB instead of 232GB as > FreeBSD did when the drive was connected via firewire. Searching the > web, I found one reference of someone else having problems with >>128/137GB using the same (latest) bios on this five year old > (Centrino) laptop (Acer TM800). FreeBSD has no such limit, at least not in recent versions (I'm using a 200 GB drive at this moment, and at home I have a system with a 500 GB and a 750 GB drive). Your problem is caused either by the BIOS lying to it (which is unlikely, because FreeBSD uses the BIOS value only for initial booting), or the hard drive itself lying. Does your drive have a jumper that causes it to report its capacity as 128GB for compatibility with older BIOSes? If so, remove the jumper and try again. -- Bob Johnson fbsdlists@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 16:07:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF091065687 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7213A8FC15 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (i223105.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.125.223.105]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4305EF96; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:07:12 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:07:12 +0900 From: WATANABE Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <391934950807310839l917ba2er926fa031778fd9e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310649g61591bdfu9aa543a271a2b44a@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310755re04cba5sdf11a34695a17807@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <391934950807310839l917ba2er926fa031778fd9e8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20080731160712.9E4305EF96@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Rommel Martinez Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:07:13 -0000 At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:47 +0800, Rommel Martinez wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:35 PM, WATANABE Kazuhiro > wrote: > > At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0800, > > Rommel Martinez wrote: > >> pcm0@pci0:0:30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x2047161f chip=0x266e8086 > >> rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 > >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > >> device = 'Intel Corporation 82830M/MG SDRAM Controller / Ho > >> AC '97 Audio Controller/ Sigmatel (SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio)' > >> class = multimedia > >> subclass = audio > > > > OK. How about this patch? > > > > --- sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c.releng70 2007-12-15 13:06:52.000000000 +0900 > > +++ sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c 2008-08-01 00:10:04.000000000 +0900 > > @@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ ich_pci_attach(device_t dev) > > switch (subdev) { > > case 0x202f161f: /* Gateway 7326GZ */ > > case 0x203a161f: /* Gateway 4028GZ */ > > + case 0x2047161f: /* Arima W330-UCX */ > > case 0x204c161f: /* Kvazar-Micro Senator 3592XT */ > > case 0x8144104d: /* Sony VAIO PCG-TR* */ > > case 0x8197104d: /* Sony S1XP */ > > > > --- > > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) > > > > OK. Is there a way to make those changes to my system without having to > rebuild world or I really need to? See the FreeBSD Handbook for details. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html Before you run "make buildkernel", you have to apply the patch like this: # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/the/patchfile If you don't want to compile a kernel and modules other than snd_ich, try this instead of "make buildkernel": # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/ich # make && make install --- WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 16:10:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D571065679 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F688FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so745234fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=MaMkJ+Hlb/X6MHpPPY/grjxkx3JW2kjSaofqtmEttDM=; b=Ysh/son5ZCWNtAIi6DNWhQE1JoSjeldr/dhCWOqLFxhQ0gFVtiYx1sazc8WSJZcZKA yuJI1QxYkLR5pMghOl8nQu57IhNzZ6gbpaHy6kcmKG014b2ZfmTVofhABdgKeodyHiUd m9ABGJt++zsIMF4B+NQPGRthW+8ntCzjAdNBQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=uZq5F3A4zEdtjKZpTzpXOUe1JomQNo8VRXjdZkoP4AzzIT3RfqJyEKLUj1y2rXjPot 6AhoffCLm7Ec9y1y+6apmf9XfTDttdIK2r+A/jwDuL6GxSYUvuUmMg6iZu6Lcyr1PJJ4 KGBFBMF2jTRdCw4wQ/uGs8khbn/TYqR4UY9+0= Received: by 10.187.174.16 with SMTP id b16mr190499fap.104.1217520627870; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807310910l48ef7d85g3aa5a200ce7ffcc6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:10:27 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20080731160712.9E4305EF96@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310649g61591bdfu9aa543a271a2b44a@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310755re04cba5sdf11a34695a17807@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <391934950807310839l917ba2er926fa031778fd9e8@mail.gmail.com> <20080731160712.9E4305EF96@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:10:29 -0000 On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:07 AM, WATANABE Kazuhiro wrote: > At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:47 +0800, > Rommel Martinez wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:35 PM, WATANABE Kazuhiro >> wrote: >> > At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0800, >> > Rommel Martinez wrote: >> >> pcm0@pci0:0:30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x2047161f chip=0x266e8086 >> >> rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 >> >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> >> device = 'Intel Corporation 82830M/MG SDRAM Controller / Ho >> >> AC '97 Audio Controller/ Sigmatel (SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio)' >> >> class = multimedia >> >> subclass = audio >> > >> > OK. How about this patch? >> > >> > --- sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c.releng70 2007-12-15 13:06:52.000000000 +0900 >> > +++ sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c 2008-08-01 00:10:04.000000000 +0900 >> > @@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ ich_pci_attach(device_t dev) >> > switch (subdev) { >> > case 0x202f161f: /* Gateway 7326GZ */ >> > case 0x203a161f: /* Gateway 4028GZ */ >> > + case 0x2047161f: /* Arima W330-UCX */ >> > case 0x204c161f: /* Kvazar-Micro Senator 3592XT */ >> > case 0x8144104d: /* Sony VAIO PCG-TR* */ >> > case 0x8197104d: /* Sony S1XP */ >> > >> > --- >> > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) >> > >> >> OK. Is there a way to make those changes to my system without having to >> rebuild world or I really need to? > > See the FreeBSD Handbook for details. > > Building and Installing a Custom Kernel > http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > Before you run "make buildkernel", you have to apply the patch like this: > > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/the/patchfile > > If you don't want to compile a kernel and modules other than snd_ich, > try this instead of "make buildkernel": > > # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/ich > # make && make install > > --- > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) > Ah. Why was I thinking of the whole userland? Anyway, I'm building a new kernel now with the patch you gave me. I'll post results asap. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 16:23:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B911065677 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9561F8FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VGN5sB001542 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:23:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6VFlmAh019063 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731174527.X19058@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: magic growisofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:24 -0000 i have DVD-sized partition with data. when i do growisofs -dvd-compat -speed=1 -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/partition EVERY DVD gets broken. i get read error somewhere (most often - between 2-3GB) when checking it with dd if=/dev/cd0 of=/dev/null bs=256k BUT - if i copy that whole partition image to file (on other,large partition) and record from file - EVERY DVD is OK. recorder and hard drive are on different ATA busses. any idea? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 16:23:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAD61065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E418FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VFln5Q019066 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6VFlmAh019063 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:47:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731174527.X19058@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: magic growisofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:23:24 -0000 i have DVD-sized partition with data. when i do growisofs -dvd-compat -speed=1 -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/partition EVERY DVD gets broken. i get read error somewhere (most often - between 2-3GB) when checking it with dd if=/dev/cd0 of=/dev/null bs=256k BUT - if i copy that whole partition image to file (on other,large partition) and record from file - EVERY DVD is OK. recorder and hard drive are on different ATA busses. any idea? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 16:51:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689171065670 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CFD8FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from pustefix159.kundenserver.de (pustefix159.kundenserver.de [172.23.4.159]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML2xA-1KObMj1oyJ-0004ps; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:51:01 +0200 Message-Id: <29825939.312031217523061419.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> From: Jan Henrik Sylvester To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Binford: 6100 (more power) X-Mailer: Webmail X-Originating-From: 34464795 X-Routing: DE X-Message-Id: <34464795$1217523061370172.23.4.15928835630@pustefix159.kundenserver.de--805196723> X-Received: from pustefix159.kundenserver.de by 78.54.99.104 with HTTP id 34464795 for [fbsdlists@gmail.com]; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:51:01 CEST Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:51:01 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18kRYvNzEacKczVMIveeZE1BfCAwW5T8AAYUTi FuJ+tBMQ7NxQ8qn6umhMLpyb8TE+LEIBd6hZoWGrmUZukV8cjr XS5DUoFO1nnRpIwpQZwig== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:51:05 -0000 >On 7/31/08, me@janh.de wrote: >> Yesterday, I wrote about "CANNOT READ BLK" from my new hd that I >> filled via firewire: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-July/179646.html >> The response suggested to check for faulty hardware, which I am still >> trying to do. >> >> I found FreeBSD reporting the drive to have 128GB instead of 232GB as >> FreeBSD did when the drive was connected via firewire. Searching the >> web, I found one reference of someone else having problems with >>>128/137GB using the same (latest) bios on this five year old >> (Centrino) laptop (Acer TM800). > >FreeBSD has no such limit, at least not in recent versions (I'm using >a 200 GB drive at this moment, and at home I have a system with a 500 >GB and a 750 GB drive). Your problem is caused either by the BIOS I never said FreeBSD had a limit. With ddo, it works. (I am on 7.0.) >lying to it (which is unlikely, because FreeBSD uses the BIOS value Yes, it is the bios. With ddo, the full disk is available; ddo supposingly does nothing but change the bios interrupt handlers. >only for initial booting), or the hard drive itself lying. Does your Are you sure about "only for initial booting"? If that was the case, I would not understand why it shows "ad0: 238475MB" with ddo and "ad0: 131072MB" without. Moreover, I tried writing to a sector beyond 128GB unsuccessfully without ddo and successfully with ddo (using dd). >drive have a jumper that causes it to report its capacity as 128GB for >compatibility with older BIOSes? If so, remove the jumper and try >again. These is no such jumper. With Linux and Windows seeing the correct size (without ddo), the drive must report it somehow correctly. Either your claim that FreeBSD is not relying on the bios is wrong, or I understand even less about the interaction of bios, drive, ddo handler, and os than I thought I would. (Please, enlighten me, if you know more.) Thanks for your input! Cheers, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 17:06:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B22106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from flpi102.prodigy.net (flpi102.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ADD8FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from nawcoms-macbook.local (adsl-68-252-71-82.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.252.71.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by flpi102.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VH6Tpp027099 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:06:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4891B8B5.8030701@nawcom.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:05:57 +0000 From: nawcom User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <391934950807310753j3a406977lf85f18eb63c077c3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <391934950807310753j3a406977lf85f18eb63c077c3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:06:30 -0000 Did you compile it from the source files there or try to use the precompiled ones? I wouldn't be surprised if the precompiled ones would crash it since it was for 6.2 - my guess is you are using a 7-release; sorry if you misinterpreted what I was directing you towards. I read up on it and this fix should be included in 7-CURRENT. Hopefully Watanabe's patch he gave you will do the trick for your specific laptop model. - nawcom > I did that and I got a kernel panic. With the following on the console: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > KLD file sound.ko - could not finalize loading > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0xf00de2cf > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0741063 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xc1020d20 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xc1020d6c > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x13 > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, 10PL = 0 > current process = 0 () > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I restored the original sound.ko snd_ich.ko to be able to use the system. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 17:22:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C85106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EA28FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ebzzry@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so780996fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:22:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=auRRxR6CCaRElPy4dgpOd7/SsuILVlxaLnEmtfFZddY=; b=W7eM8vH9pxnRbJyQYShgXB7Pw6a4bTbI18dpIUddsTbuUgVTGazJ1GH1G4KBBMt8hi yg49MAJBuDUjG/o1UIJoJzjCN0+d+YaCaJM2VTbCTYyiBD4OIc7+cUn5hgV22JeLlExR qU21qW4JEp4nGJY5aDbsPA0clfwnu8PEO9LNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=OfM3YZQpb3UmX5RrL7g2QHHbY3/unrTpZ5NtZJaAICP+2Cdr1GnAVTVZeQffxMRotE JfWB8o+Qna8ML9noKPE3VKvbBgxox4Ek9fVjay0AFXvHnKMnqaS65PgMrzQ3iRWAp7FA /HL5B/0JXgX6oTPQAYWeCEd09gskoN9w+MKrY= Received: by 10.187.175.6 with SMTP id c6mr188896fap.89.1217524955529; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.243.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391934950807311022v7b574fe4i8fd59411f7a5f880@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:22:35 +0800 From: "Rommel Martinez" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <391934950807310910l48ef7d85g3aa5a200ce7ffcc6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <391934950807300450s236217d1yadd5dfe78969ae50@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310649g61591bdfu9aa543a271a2b44a@mail.gmail.com> <391934950807310755re04cba5sdf11a34695a17807@mail.gmail.com> <20080731130958.81B4B5F74D@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <20080731153506.8081A5ECA0@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <391934950807310839l917ba2er926fa031778fd9e8@mail.gmail.com> <20080731160712.9E4305EF96@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> <391934950807310910l48ef7d85g3aa5a200ce7ffcc6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Very very weak sound from the speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:22:37 -0000 On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Rommel Martinez wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:07 AM, WATANABE Kazuhiro wrote: >> At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:39:47 +0800, >> Rommel Martinez wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:35 PM, WATANABE Kazuhiro >>> wrote: >>> > At Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0800, >>> > Rommel Martinez wrote: >>> >> pcm0@pci0:0:30:2: class=0x040100 card=0x2047161f chip=0x266e8086 >>> >> rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 >>> >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >>> >> device = 'Intel Corporation 82830M/MG SDRAM Controller / Ho >>> >> AC '97 Audio Controller/ Sigmatel (SoundMAX Integrated Digital Audio)' >>> >> class = multimedia >>> >> subclass = audio >>> > >>> > OK. How about this patch? >>> > >>> > --- sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c.releng70 2007-12-15 13:06:52.000000000 +0900 >>> > +++ sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c 2008-08-01 00:10:04.000000000 +0900 >>> > @@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ ich_pci_attach(device_t dev) >>> > switch (subdev) { >>> > case 0x202f161f: /* Gateway 7326GZ */ >>> > case 0x203a161f: /* Gateway 4028GZ */ >>> > + case 0x2047161f: /* Arima W330-UCX */ >>> > case 0x204c161f: /* Kvazar-Micro Senator 3592XT */ >>> > case 0x8144104d: /* Sony VAIO PCG-TR* */ >>> > case 0x8197104d: /* Sony S1XP */ >>> > >>> > --- >>> > WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) >>> > >>> >>> OK. Is there a way to make those changes to my system without having to >>> rebuild world or I really need to? >> >> See the FreeBSD Handbook for details. >> >> Building and Installing a Custom Kernel >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html >> >> Before you run "make buildkernel", you have to apply the patch like this: >> >> # cd /usr/src >> # patch < /path/to/the/patchfile >> >> If you don't want to compile a kernel and modules other than snd_ich, >> try this instead of "make buildkernel": >> >> # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/ich >> # make && make install >> >> --- >> WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) >> > > Ah. Why was I thinking of the whole userland? Anyway, I'm building a > new kernel now with the patch you gave me. I'll post results asap. > > > -- > Rommel M. Martinez > Great! I have "normal" audio now. Thanks a lot Kazuhiro. By the way, when I set the volume (mixer vol) to 100, I would hear a loud, continuous beep, so what I do is I lower the value to around 90 and the loud beep goes away. What's causing it? Is the behaviour to be expected? Thanks a lot. Finally, I can play audio/video without having to boot to Windows. -- Rommel M. Martinez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 17:58:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922961065674 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no) Received: from asav3.lyse.net (asav3.lyse.net [81.167.37.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539348FC16 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asav3.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745C884249 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:35:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lyse.net Received: from terra.hatteland1.org (129.81-166-80.customer.lyse.net [81.166.80.129]) by asav3.lyse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E979B84245 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:35:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4891F7F2.90204@kleppnett.no> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:35:46 +0200 From: kenneth hatteland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd and fluxbox locales X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:58:57 -0000 I have read all I can google and the handbook trying to make my norwegian special keys working along with @ amongst others. so something is wrong with my locales. I have been given many things to try but no luck whatsoever. this is my.login.conf :charset=ISO-8859-1:\ :lang=nb_NO.ISO8859-1: this is .bashrc export LANG="nb_NO.ISO-8859-1" export LC_ALL="nb.NO.ISO-8859-1" anyone who` s got something else for me to try is very apprecheated :) Kenneth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 18:19:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3648106567B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-32.bluehost.com [69.89.18.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B21188FC16 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 27298 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jul 2008 18:19:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 18:19:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=mlGw+onQ8QO12tQ0qzBu//xsv8mu5aJshVsw0mVreuawDHQdSFxdmyxdltXkiAxXW2UOe2ZjiTQjf2yCJbdqy2x+eBxqjDj7QVtHnuPgkN4O80wf5www+8w9k+88yWgn; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOckC-0005ig-Ec for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:19:20 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:13:17 -0600 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:13:17 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731181317.GB5723@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: (math related) fonts in www/firefox-2.0.0.14_1,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:19:24 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:42:39AM -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm having some trouble getting firefox to display certain (math > related) fonts. >=20 > For example, the page for the Poisson distribution at Wikipedia > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution) uses, what I > believe is, a lambba character (sentence with the pmf), but it shows > up like this for me: http://jrm.ath.cx/misc/firefox_math_fonts.png. > I've installed x11-fonts/mathfonts-4.1_5 and it seems to be working > well based on my results at http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/. Is > there anything else I'm missing? Do you have the x11-fonts/webfonts port installed? That would be my first guess. A second might be x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Mediocrity corrupts. Bureaucracy corrupts absolutely. --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSAL0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKURwwCfXGGJSavbZIHyMkfGJOWR+q16 KEoAnihG7E4igc5Bx9VkKLyqjysWq4+K =h06y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 18:25:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DE31065686 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4497E8FC17 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so889172rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=WNc/1oksZmznie6QIiMVCqMr2bv4yDxMMiiy77XKOcw=; b=cLocHT26YMT8V0dT0oufD5dDgqP1Ysxl767mUy6Ss4P4NxM2DfhohrDQIpchG3qHaA k5iF2IepDU7ZpoyIqm5wiSExWA7alwzDlVLKA6Tc1pcsfUnZBpIw1koDEAtpRzKK2SuS qhmhawD6XrbaDXaKr9sEVkVSVu0B7+RBg1S1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=re5Xu5d7ANaWZ9uPOsv5UdhtpFVvVfjujoZjJ9Lak13tqQam5cyhDDeA6VCpYc5OXh /NOl2co5QuUGmQOypAKPBmI84MG8MDLeedyyRrTkJKfdCdAWqAG1eovgjTdbD4O7EXJN SFvnTJ9sCbmsMk9QI65IFzStcODxBILwgPLz8= Received: by 10.141.78.14 with SMTP id f14mr5466831rvl.119.1217528724539; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.77.2 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:25:24 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080730123201.3219ed25@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080730123201.3219ed25@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Imposible to update/upgrade ports.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:25:25 -0000 2008/7/30 Gerard > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:21 -0300 > Agus wrote: > > >Hi guys, > > > >I'v been delaying the installed ports upgrade cause i was testing my > >server and now that it it in production i wanted to upgrade them and > >find it impossible... > > > >I am running > > uname -a > >FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: > >Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007 > > > >I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then > >installed portmanager and portsaudit.... > > > >did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, like sec, mysql and > >more.... > > > >Now while trying to update with > > > >portmanager sysutils/rsync -l -ui -f > >#Then also tried without the f > > > >get this errors: > >--------------------------------- > > > >portmanager 0.4.1_9 > > > > perl-5.8.8_1 /lang/perl5.8 > > make Strike 2 > > > >it gets like its looping while updating perl.... > >For what i saw, portmanager seems to try to update all dependencies > >too..and is failing in that.... > > > >Something similar happened while trying to update apache22 > > > >Its my first try updating/upgrading ports...and it was hard to find a > >doc explaining this....i mean..there are lots of docs but each with > >different methods... > > > >Well, hope you can give me a jhand.. > > I use portmanager myself occasionally. They this: > > 1) Update your ports tree > 2) Run: portmanager -u -l -y -p > > If it fails again, look in the log file (/var/log/portmanager.log) and > see what it says. You can post the error message back here. > > > -- > Gerard > gerard@seibercom.net > > Convention is the ruler of all. > > Pindar > OK...I ll try it..... Thanks :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 18:32:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52995106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA408FC1C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so319465ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=TJFJ815g2ZCRuiu8DFQkjn1XsA2PDkILNbF3CZDK5MM=; b=WGcokmxtuM3EyPLiJiBdXaIE2z5NrKDXVgnwZBwFZTSDoASb+rzpNNFy74uFkWkX5K gqxnmqYhRKLZSDmoKVhvF0obw2vwg6TRkKnQ90D4hyWvTZNClH5iOU8IbxXALn5dZzF3 87DSYmLGFy6we+N0BnFQ8ikeZLchcqqsvR4qY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :x-google-sender-auth; b=szwweUvSTW5jR28Xe9th+rndGQim99rKNUfB2HZ7LbIwXbUexjMbVlOM72wvKy7e32 Sds6CxRKzbCNkdbwhWMHfffa6vRj0FqI1Vm1KuLcr5mI0dnBd5KRYqAukr3a6R3+kp2l +sNWR50RZTNNCAr07p/uc0lvJBH2xWJAZKaUM= Received: by 10.150.58.1 with SMTP id g1mr1686147yba.85.1217529132352; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.124.5 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90807311132x326d8323h873428425368da51@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:32:12 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8eb54372b4a22fc5 Subject: rc.suspend/rc.resume was: resume (hate to even ask) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:32:13 -0000 I just realized no one probably replied to my email due to the gross ambiguity of the english language. No, I am not looking for a job. See below ;) On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Steve Franks wrote: > Ok, > > I have too many systems with varying degrees of working freebsd on > them, and I can't seem to leave well enough alone. I hear lots of > people having sucess with suspend, and I can't get it to work on a > single system. > > My current strongest desire is to get it running on my hp ze4500 > laptop. I've played with the stuff in the handbook, but that just > took me from having a blank screen and no responses from Ctl-Alt-F(x) > to now the fan comes on for a moment on resume, then the system powers > off....doesn't seem to matter if X is up or not. > > I've kldunloaded usb, radeon, sound, drm, what else should I try? > Also, rc.resume has a typo, right? I'm susposed to change the > #kldunload usb section to add kldload usb (and friends) right? > > Steve > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 18:38:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05541065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7651C8FC27 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joey@mingrone.org) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so320849ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.162.9 with SMTP id k9mr3381593wfe.158.1217529491874; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.158.15 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:38:11 -0300 From: "Joey Mingrone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080731181317.GB5723@kokopelli.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080731181317.GB5723@kokopelli.hydra> Subject: Re: (math related) fonts in www/firefox-2.0.0.14_1,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:13 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:42:39AM -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm having some trouble getting firefox to display certain (math >> related) fonts. >> >> For example, the page for the Poisson distribution at Wikipedia >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution) uses, what I >> believe is, a lambba character (sentence with the pmf), but it shows >> up like this for me: http://jrm.ath.cx/misc/firefox_math_fonts.png. >> I've installed x11-fonts/mathfonts-4.1_5 and it seems to be working >> well based on my results at http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/. Is >> there anything else I'm missing? > > Do you have the x11-fonts/webfonts port installed? That would be my > first guess. A second might be x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype. > The x11-fonts/webfonts did the trick. Thanks Chad. Joey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 19:04:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82412106566B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0DD8FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DFB573E2C20; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C1E3E2C1F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: duane@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: CD Won't Boot Properly - External Sony VGP-UDRW1 Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d.hill@yournetplus.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:13 -0000 I have a new Sony Vaio TZ2500 I'm attempting to load FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. Whenever the CD starts to boot, the screen just starts showing what appears to be memory dumps. If you stare at the screen long enough, you can tell there are two columns of eight hex pairs. They flash by so fast you can't hardly make out what is being displayed. Does anyone know what might be going on and how to get the CD to boot properly? -d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 19:14:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4328106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737208FC17 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so918504rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=lIgrabwFax4Iim5VK7KWOvHfio5TkfAwIqcwXXESv7Y=; b=Il/Q8ESibYZNMzTz8HsxHj6Iw/gkNr8tOnncXpAxzd7PSL3syXADWKUkcMGGoXLBnn nF4KfJoU8Dm2oHq+ZpQw46ZUSxyF2TXDx/O3vLUy43Wx+gWRYIGdxepFiGY/rranStpT j38gK/5LTFtRVFzG1iyf2+CcCclWNc8oqkJNs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sqCnVnJ4u6+AwgYNGmBGFDaPIdnEzrAfEwRuI+GN2gpO5Lu7IXn9AJ6uk7WxI/vGcy /lcPEjItO2xJuvYTICeucHp/UedykvlJNipqvwAu23xH8T8Cde7qFJLrnOWVIDrq2Sej EqLx+0E1ElxySIv3++QyFPzf0Jy5YiDdogwuE= Received: by 10.141.162.16 with SMTP id p16mr5479954rvo.243.1217531647043; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.135.3 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54db43990807311214g6d6bc1bbm92bf660b10bfbb18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:14:06 -0400 From: "Bob Johnson" To: "Jan Henrik Sylvester" In-Reply-To: <29825939.312031217523061419.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <29825939.312031217523061419.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:14:07 -0000 On 7/31/08, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>On 7/31/08, me@janh.de wrote: >>> Yesterday, I wrote about "CANNOT READ BLK" from my new hd that I >>> filled via firewire: >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-July/179646.html >>> The response suggested to check for faulty hardware, which I am still >>> trying to do. >>> >>> I found FreeBSD reporting the drive to have 128GB instead of 232GB as >>> FreeBSD did when the drive was connected via firewire. Searching the >>> web, I found one reference of someone else having problems with >>>>128/137GB using the same (latest) bios on this five year old >>> (Centrino) laptop (Acer TM800). >> I don't know how long ago the ATA-6 specification was adopted, but prior to that ATA-5 had a 128 GB limit on disk size. I suspect your BIOS is old enough to have adopted that limit. Perhaps if a BIOS update for your system is available, it will solve your problem. BUT, my understanding is that after the initial boot, FreeBSD reads the size directly from the drive, so it seems strange that you are encountering this problem if the drive itself is correctly reporting its size. Anyway, the fundamental answer to your question is "this should not be happening." The challenge is to figure out where the problem is and what to do about it. >>FreeBSD has no such limit, at least not in recent versions (I'm using >>a 200 GB drive at this moment, and at home I have a system with a 500 >>GB and a 750 GB drive). Your problem is caused either by the BIOS > > I never said FreeBSD had a limit. With ddo, it works. (I am on 7.0.) > >>lying to it (which is unlikely, because FreeBSD uses the BIOS value > > Yes, it is the bios. With ddo, the full disk is available; ddo supposingly > does nothing but change the bios interrupt handlers. > >>only for initial booting), or the hard drive itself lying. Does your > > Are you sure about "only for initial booting"? If that was the case, I would > not understand why it shows "ad0: 238475MB" with ddo and "ad0: 131072MB" > without. Moreover, I tried writing to a sector beyond 128GB unsuccessfully > without ddo and successfully with ddo (using dd). > I am quite certain, although I don't know the details. Like any modern operating system (and since before some of them), FreeBSD asks the drive for its size. >>drive have a jumper that causes it to report its capacity as 128GB for >>compatibility with older BIOSes? If so, remove the jumper and try >>again. > > These is no such jumper. With Linux and Windows seeing the correct size > (without ddo), the drive must report it somehow correctly. > > Either your claim that FreeBSD is not relying on the bios is wrong, or I > understand even less about the interaction of bios, drive, ddo handler, and > os than I thought I would. (Please, enlighten me, if you know more.) > I think it would be informative to do as someone suggested after your first post, and re-install FreeBSD on the partition from scratch, to see if it that solves the behavior problems. It could be an artifact of your transfer method, although I don't have a specific theory to explain it. By the way, what version of FreeBSD is on the system? Any chance it is old enough that it didn't support drives larger than 128 GB (I don't know how old that would have to be)? That might include a bug in an IDE driver that has since been fixed, or an obscure default configuration option that changes FreeBSD's idea of how to address a drive. Another thought is that if you aren't using the FreeBSD loader (MBR), then your problems may be caused by the loader. You could test this by installing the FreeBSD disk loader (I think that would be "boot0cfg -B ad0", but I might not have that right). Is there any chance the MS-DOS partition table got changed at some point to tell FreeBSD the partition is smaller than the BSD label says it is? > Thanks for your input! Good luck. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 19:19:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAC11065673 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvm@CBORD.com) Received: from smssmtp.cbord.com (mx1.cbord.com [24.39.174.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DDF8FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rvm@CBORD.com) X-AuditID: ac1f0165-00000f80000000f8-d1-4892105344d9 Received: from Email.cbord.com ([10.1.1.100]) by smssmtp.cbord.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:47 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:17:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Thread safe library references Thread-Index: AcjzQiS31qAHAm4/THyb+FQxpsA13w== From: "Bob McConnell" To: X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: Thread safe library references X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:19:41 -0000 Where can I find an authoritative list of libraries and functions that are thread safe? I am using FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE, and none of the documentation I have been able to get my eyes on even mention threads. Thank you, Bob McConnell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 19:25:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B391065685 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74998FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VJQ5jp095177 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:26:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:25:51 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080731192548.GA96470@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: any volunteers in the Seattle area? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:25:54 -0000 hello to any listmember in the seattle metro area, i can't ask my 72-year-old fellow nerd pal to heft my 19" CRT, so is there anyone else who will help me swap out this ancient tube and put in my new LCD display? (if might be better to reply off-list because this *is* a bit OT) thanks, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 19:43:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D6B106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5680A8FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from rmc67-31.zih.tu-dresden.de ([141.30.67.31] helo=server-n) by mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOdOR-00082k-8H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:57 +0200 Received: from martin (p5B0EF59F.dip.t-dialin.net [91.14.245.159]) by server-n (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4729100A08E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:53 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Martin Laabs" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Linux) X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de Subject: Compile firefox with debug symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:43:39 -0000 Hi, I have some problems with firefox (it just don't start - as well as openoffice.) I think it is a broken lib - but though I recompiled all the libs it still does not work. Now I'll do it the right way and use gdb but until now I had no success compiling a binary of firefox (or regxpcom which also hangs) with debug symbols I tried " make DEBUG=3Don LOGGING=3Don" but this produced also only the stripped binaries. So - how can I build firefox (form the ports) with debug symbols? Thank you, Martin L. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:04:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFF51065672 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D5918FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 14626 invoked by uid 1006); 31 Jul 2008 19:37:29 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(-1.4/100.0):. Processed in 0.124166 secs); 31 Jul 2008 19:37:29 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO laz1) (172.16.0.69) by -v with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 19:37:29 -0000 Received: from [10.75.0.1] by webmail.vandaliamo.net with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:37:29 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:37:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Jay Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <207569.19851217533049107.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Laszlo Mail 2 X-Originating-IP: [10.75.0.1] Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Bypassing Transparent Proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jhall@vandaliamo.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:04:16 -0000 Ladies and Gentlemen, A situation has arisen for which I need to bypass my transparent proxy server (Squid) for a ceratin IP address range. Following are the contents of my ipnat.rules file. map em1 192.d.e.f/24 -> 0/32 map em1 from 10.a.b.c/24 to 69.147.83.33/32 -> 0/32 rdr em0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.x.y.z port 3128 tcp map em1 10.a.b.c/24 -> 0/32 em1 is the external interface on my server. My thinking with the rules, was adding the map command before the rdr would prevent traffic destined for 69.147.83.33 from hitting the proxy server. Unfortunately, it did not work. Is there an easy way to bypass the proxy server when accessing this one address? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:18:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB59106566B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82108FC14 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7F71228469; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:18:34 -0400 (EDT) To: "Kiffin Gish" References: <001301c8f1a7$f3c38a50$6601a8c0@KGISH> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:18:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001301c8f1a7$f3c38a50$6601a8c0@KGISH> (Kiffin Gish's message of "Tue\, 29 Jul 2008 20\:21\:42 +0200") Message-ID: <44abfxzu1x.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Could not find bsd.port.options.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:18:35 -0000 "Kiffin Gish" writes: > When I run portupgrade I get the following make error: > > "Makefile", line 55: Could not find bsd.port.options.mk > > However, this file is located at: /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk > > What's going wrong? Do you have the one in /usr/share/mk? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:26:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B1C1065698 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31538FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F0F9F28469; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:26:43 -0400 (EDT) To: Valeriu Mutu References: <20080730164031.GA6262@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:26:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080730164031.GA6262@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu> (Valeriu Mutu's message of "Wed\, 30 Jul 2008 12\:40\:32 -0400") Message-ID: <4463qlztoc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD-questions list Subject: Re: Problem building openssh-portable with KERBEROS, GSSAPI, KERB_GSSAPI. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:26:45 -0000 Valeriu Mutu writes: > I am trying to build 'openssh-portable' from ports (security/openssh-portable/) with the following configuration options: > > PAM=on "Enable pam(3) support" > TCP_WRAPPERS=on "Enable tcp_wrappers support" > LIBEDIT=on "Enable readline support to sftp(1)" > KERBEROS=on "Enable kerberos (autodetection)" > SUID_SSH=off "Enable suid SSH (Recommended off)" > GSSAPI=on "Enable GSSAPI support (req: KERBEROS)" > KERB_GSSAPI=on "Enable Kerberos/GSSAPI patch (req: GSSAPI)" > OPENSSH_CHROOT=off "Enable CHROOT support" > OPENSC=off "Enable OpenSC smartcard support" > OPENSCPINPATCH=off "Enable OpenSC PIN patch" > HPN=off "Enable HPN-SSH patch" > LPK=off "Enable LDAP Public Key (LPK) patch" > OVERWRITE_BASE=off "OpenSSH overwrite base" > > and get the following error on 'make': > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ... > if test ! -z ""; then /usr/bin/perl5 ./fixprogs ssh_prng_cmds ; fi > (cd openbsd-compat && make) > cc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o sshconnect.o sshconnect1.o sshconnect2.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/ -L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L/lib -lssh -lopenbsd-compat -lcrypto -lutil -lz -lcrypt -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err > ./libssh.a(gss-genr.o)(.text+0xa8c): In function `ssh_gssapi_import_name': > /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.0p1/gss-genr.c:369: undefined reference to `gss_nt_service_name' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/work/openssh-5.0p1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable. For what it's worth, I can't reproduce the problem on a 6-week-old version of 7-STABLE, with ports a couple of days old. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:30:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097F6106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raggen@passagen.se) Received: from av7-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av7-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94C98FC0C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raggen@passagen.se) Received: by av7-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5D3AA37F7B; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:43:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av7-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F9D37E91; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.31] (90-230-141-139-no41.tbcn.telia.com [90.230.141.139]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C83137E46; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48921927.2050008@passagen.se> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:27 +0200 From: Roger Olofsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kenneth hatteland References: <4891F7F2.90204@kleppnett.no> In-Reply-To: <4891F7F2.90204@kleppnett.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd and fluxbox locales X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:30:03 -0000 Hello Kenneth, I think you need to run xorgconfig and set the appropriate keyboard when creating xorg.conf. For fluxbox there is however a file called "keys" in the .fluxbox directory if there is any special character you would want mapped (For FreeBSD you set it with sysinstall but that is not the issue here) /Roger kenneth hatteland skrev: > I have read all I can google and the handbook trying to make my > norwegian special keys working along with @ amongst others. so something > is wrong with my locales. > I have been given many things to try but no luck whatsoever. > > this is my.login.conf > :charset=ISO-8859-1:\ > :lang=nb_NO.ISO8859-1: > > this is .bashrc > export LANG="nb_NO.ISO-8859-1" > export LC_ALL="nb.NO.ISO-8859-1" > > anyone who` s got something else for me to try is very apprecheated :) > > Kenneth > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: > 270.5.9/1583 - Release Date: 2008-07-31 06:17 > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:39:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3E71065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6A08FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VKdVni095735 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:39:17 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:39:20 -0000 hi people, a friend gave me two of his old dell keyboards; one of which has worked pretty well. trouble is that is it very large-- std?? travel-time is just that much more since i am using only my left hand. Soooo: i'mm looking for a compact keyboard with built-in clicky keys. ---flames to /dev/null, guys. (circa 1988 when i joined yet-another-startup and i turned on the Sun "click" audio, my co-workers [in the same room] nearly lynched me).--- i don't watch the screen when i type; i watch my fingers. still without a solid *thunk*, i can't be certain whether i hit a key. (never took typing in high school; that was only for girls:) is there a newer, more-better, prefferedstandard than the "PS/2" essentially: small footprint, key-click [either mechanical or electronic], std layout. tia, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:53:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600F2106567E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79C88FC19 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (f054099104.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.99.104]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML2xA-1KOf9N2WNR-0005DG; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <48922646.7030902@janh.de> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:53:26 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Johnson References: <29825939.312031217523061419.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> <54db43990807311214g6d6bc1bbm92bf660b10bfbb18@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54db43990807311214g6d6bc1bbm92bf660b10bfbb18@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX183xJUFyRFeo0WxDSz091nZuxOokc4ULFKg03t xrJVSQAKSYeh5nwgxBPnuUSsBm9iF1mWpuR2+x0xmgTYa64MXl kjZyfOEyX9jUbG9IOrZtQ== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:31 -0000 I guess I should have put it more concise as some important details were lost in the middle of the background story. --- The important part: ---> If I boot the FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE livefs CD, I have my 232GB hd limited to 128GB. (According to dmesg and some dd writing tests.) If I boot the dynamic drive overlay MBR that changes the INT13 bios routines and let it boot the livefs CD, FreeBSD can access all 232GB. These two cases happen with the same MBR and the same content on the drive. <--- (Important part ending) --- From my limited understanding: This cannot be about the FreeBSD installation transfered by firewire, since it is long gone. This cannot be about the FreeBSD MBR, since it is not involved. This is not about the partition table, since it is the same. Doing the same with a Linux live CD (Knoppix), I can access the whole drive in both cases. Windows reports 232GB, too, but according to this (German) posting http://www.acer-userforum.de/thread.php?postid=40207 writing above 128GB will wrap around for the 855GME chipset driver (I have 855PM). The posting claims ddo would solve it, which I cannot understand, if the Windows driver ignores the bios information. (The posting is about Acer Travelmate 661. I got the 800 from the same time.) My laptop is more than five years old and I have got the latest bios for years, apparently without 48bit LBA. I am kind of lost. I cannot understand the disassembled MBR and even if I could, I do not think I would want to create my own boot manager / INT13 handler. I guess reading FreeBSD source code would be next... but I am not very confident there, either. The alternative is that my understanding of the problem is totally wrong. Thanks for more helping to think through this mess of information I got during the last day. Cheers, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:53:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD2A1065685 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F0D8FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4W001T921NWM81@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:53:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:53:43 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080731165343.1f9c33ba@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:53:59 -0000 I know of a company that makes new buckle-spring keyboards of all sorts, unicomp (uses the name pckeyboards). That includes custom made ones. The only issue for me is the price, $99. The one I've been wanting is the endurapro with a thinkpad-like stick in the middle. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:56:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8381A1065670 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com [69.89.22.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E09A8FC1B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 11906 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jul 2008 20:56:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 20:56:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=KwZP2UsZYorocDCEjJh3homIQILDKIzRO1h4rzwkvAZM5vVPOML7CbjAa25hdL6aQa4WODzkd1NPVBB0XdMqlveWR0kaDQ2tsgQDYZhXPaO0z5eKyT/l8R2Mlwh2QCgX; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOfCO-0000Ll-EK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:56:37 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:50:33 -0600 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:50:33 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-ID: <20080731205033.GA6805@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List References: <4890694A.9030607@lvor.halvorsen.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4890694A.9030607@lvor.halvorsen.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: OT: encrypted email using web based application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:56:40 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > Andrew Gould wrote: > > If I start with Subject line with the word "secure" using my work's ema= il > > system, the email is sent to a secure, web based application where the > > recipients can view the message securely. The recipients receive a mes= sage > > that a secure email message is waiting for them there. They have to cr= eate > > an account based upon their email address to view the message. They do= not > > have to recreate the accounts for future messages. > >=20 > > This system is easy to use; and we don't have to worry about whether the > > recipients have PGP or GPG. Is there an open source application that d= oes > > this? >=20 > How is this secure? Ok, I can see that if the message is served over > https, then the network packages themselves cannot be sniffed > easily. But as long as the recipient did not give you the key to > use, then this is not secure. Why should the recipient trust the server? >=20 > Whether there is an open source solution, I don't know however. It depends on your definition of "secure" -- which can vary from one circumstance to another. If the emails in question are "company property", there's no reason to consider access to the emails by company officials a breach of security. On the other hand, if sensitive company information is sniffed in plain text on the network, that could be disastrous. =46rom the sound of it, the circumstances the OP described refer to such a situation -- one where strict person-to-person privacy isn't a necessary goal of relevant security concerns. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Scott McNealy: "Microsoft is now talking about the digital nervous system. I guess I would be nervous if my system was built on their technology too." --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSJZkACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWu+wCgjnRTlQQ/ZJ6xQ+dDixGzzaHM 6Q0An3ohI17xPtj91WdH2e05v0GbIF6v =tc2A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 20:57:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774031065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBE88FC0A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VKvVRw082495; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:57:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F478BA83; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:57:31 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:57:34 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:39:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: >=20 > hi people, >=20 > a friend gave me two of his old dell keyboards; one of which has > worked pretty well. trouble is that is it very large-- std?? > travel-time is just that much more since i am using only my > left hand. Soooo: i'mm looking for a compact keyboard with > built-in clicky keys. A company named Unicomp now manufactures the "IBM Model-M" keyboard with the buckling springs (they acquired the patents from Lenovo); http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/ Check out their spacesaver model: http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/en104bl.html=20 I'm thinking of orderding one myself, because I really liked the solid feel of those old model-M keyboards. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSJzsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUL2ACgqu41r7M+ZJqxTLArOhmsJqCS UjsAn0JcFW4hUEL6oRYVoQcjNSQRrRle =gtaX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:00:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E751065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2738FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VL0BpX079233; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1897ABAB8; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Martin Laabs Message-ID: <20080731210011.GB56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compile firefox with debug symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:13 -0000 --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:00:53PM +0200, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have some problems with firefox (it just don't > start - as well as openoffice.) I think it is a > broken lib - but though I recompiled all the libs > it still does not work. It might not be necessary to trot out gdb just yet. Try starting firefox from a terminal. It will print a message if it cannot find a library. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSJ9sACgkQEnfvsMMhpyW5ygCfeIP/LtDHUXXlyo0Vjgj2TRNk +yQAn27Ndi2+yvBkUCIA1jHKrvuCoc6p =MMwB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:00:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2211065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEEC8FC1D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4W001UZ2BXD801@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:59:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:59:57 -0400 From: David Gurvich To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-id: <20080731165957.31a45f39@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Mounting hfs+ ipod on freebsd i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:00:20 -0000 Does the kernel need to be rebuilt in order to mount an ipod formatted with apple's hfs+ filesystem? If yes, what options are needed in the kernel and if not, what needs to be done? Other than reformatting to fat32. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:02:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128071065670 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64738FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4W004VT2FIR6T0@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:02:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:02:05 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080731170205.43b58bea@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:34 -0000 Hello Roland, So you have also been lusting after one of these keyboards? Has anyone actually ordered and used one of these and what is the opinion on them? Thanks David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:05:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC141065690 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBA78FC1F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from max.local (rrcs-74-218-226-253.se.biz.rr.com [74.218.226.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m6VL5uJP029391; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:05:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:06:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080731165957.31a45f39@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20080731165957.31a45f39@verizon.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807311706.31659.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: David Gurvich Subject: Re: Mounting hfs+ ipod on freebsd i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:05:57 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008, David Gurvich wrote: > Does the kernel need to be rebuilt in order to mount an ipod formatted > with apple's hfs+ filesystem? If yes, what options are needed in the > kernel and if not, what needs to be done? Other than reformatting to > fat32. Take a look at emulators/hfs and/or emulators/hfsutils. I haven't used either but it looks like they should do the trick. My guess is they run in userland and don't require kernel modifications. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:16:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384AC1065672 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mx1.identry.com (on.identry.com [66.111.0.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14728FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: (qmail 10310 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2008 21:16:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.110?) (jalmberg@75.127.142.66) by mx1.identry.com with ESMTPA; 31 Jul 2008 21:16:49 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: John Almberg Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:16:48 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:16:51 -0000 I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I do provide a small number of users ftp access. Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other users home directories. I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? Thanks: John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:28:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC91106567D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BF28FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so900552fkk.11 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mt0cxB3d+T7bgWgAAbABIXdwyEIyQDjdbKnmt1M2RiA=; b=s1iRFi/c/QX5POo6MtsZgCi0NGXWpLSIKFvBk9HdR8uDHAfKyAFg4+9P3BG31Mvvfn HhShml3mMbUtl+Uhtq7G+9oPR1noRz/0yCx5djz1KLQAz8yMXc+ymGi1c8zsrAguJiAT fGbvgsIl96DNWlqMsm3fb2ru8HAnkQoBlMv5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aMOtDJAHAKIKZuo+ss6mVKGzm4j+45Hc5cR61Mv/V5rxdc/JgcCql41+PdnAe9HPzW 76jGAMrTmN6Wtt2fG6dBiese4SqKoOZG0EWUPCH+tX2Ym72YlSJuwohFWYrlk3pLBHTp 5eBAUb1HWOldcakMVA3MG80UFxkIC/U/ove2Y= Received: by 10.181.22.8 with SMTP id z8mr3689227bki.78.1217539683939; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org ( [79.130.48.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm313884fkx.1.2008.07.31.14.28.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48922E60.5090908@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:28:00 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Almberg References: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> In-Reply-To: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:05 -0000 John Almberg wrote: > I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I do > provide a small number of users ftp access. > > Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home directories > have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log in as one > user, I can read and even download the contents of other users home > directories. > > I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? > Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? > > Thanks: John > What ftp server software are you using? For example, in proftpd, you simply add this line to /usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf: DefaultRoot ~ and everyone is "jailed" into his own directory. It also seems the ftp daemon in the base system supports this through /etc/ftpchroot. If you are using it, read the man pages for ftpd(8) and ftpchroot(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:28:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063A5106567D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (SNOWBALL.pcbi.upenn.edu [128.91.62.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7898FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6VLSaZm017981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:28:37 -0400 Received: (from vmutu@localhost) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m6VLSaeE017979; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:28:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:28:36 -0400 From: Valeriu Mutu To: John Almberg Message-ID: <20080731212836.GH19484@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu> References: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux Organization: Penn Center for Bioinformatics Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:28:38 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:16:48PM -0400, John Almberg wrote: > I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I > do provide a small number of users ftp access. > > Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home > directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log > in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other > users home directories. > > I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? > Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? > > Thanks: John > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi John, If the user logs into their own directory via FTP, there should be a way to "chroot" him/her, so that the home directory appears as the root directory. Consult your FTP server manuals for this. You might also turn off the r,w,x bits for other. Valeriu -- Valeriu Mutu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:34:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D68106566C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2658FC1A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so1160440ika.3 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.102.12 with SMTP id z12mr11564540ebb.52.1217540059683; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.41? ( [24.199.214.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y37sm792233iky.8.2008.07.31.14.34.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48922FD7.8000805@chessgriffin.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:34:15 -0400 From: Chess Griffin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:34:22 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > > I'm thinking of orderding one myself, because I really liked the solid feel > of those old model-M keyboards. > I use an original model M made in the mid 1980's and love it. You can still order used and new original Model M's from http://www.clickykeyboards.com/ including the 84-key space saver model. -- Chess Griffin GPG Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:57:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8011106564A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-04.bluehost.com [69.89.21.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B15388FC19 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 19853 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jul 2008 21:57:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 21:57:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=dQzFXattYIx9TRziuWlAG/ObxERPqxk2AeYpEut0YvRzh/vR+DfN3LaM6lvBCojNByO4knBJ2bGXabwG3wVgbVAYecBU5U2L/F5DRTxYegmyuB3C6Jznl1ZhVx8bDO2n; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOg8u-0001my-BP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:04 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:51:01 -0600 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:51:01 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080731215101.GB7256@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080731181317.GB5723@kokopelli.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: (math related) fonts in www/firefox-2.0.0.14_1,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:08 -0000 --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:38:11PM -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:42:39AM -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm having some trouble getting firefox to display certain (math > >> related) fonts. > >> > >> For example, the page for the Poisson distribution at Wikipedia > >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution) uses, what I > >> believe is, a lambba character (sentence with the pmf), but it shows > >> up like this for me: http://jrm.ath.cx/misc/firefox_math_fonts.png. > >> I've installed x11-fonts/mathfonts-4.1_5 and it seems to be working > >> well based on my results at http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/. Is > >> there anything else I'm missing? > > > > Do you have the x11-fonts/webfonts port installed? That would be my > > first guess. A second might be x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype. > > >=20 > The x11-fonts/webfonts did the trick. Thanks Chad. Glad to be of help. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Peter Norvig: "Use the most natural notation available to solve the problem, and then worry about writing an interpreter for that notation." --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSM8UACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXRDwCeLSub0gG4gm970NVkiTcZVjOQ CYcAoOGl8STKSGM68LVtNMVSMuJ1MD3T =AlhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 21:57:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFCF106566B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875E48FC15 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VLvQRR012196; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m6VLvQHS012193; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jay Hall In-Reply-To: <207569.19851217533049107.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> Message-ID: References: <207569.19851217533049107.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bypassing Transparent Proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:57:27 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jay Hall wrote: > A situation has arisen for which I need to bypass my transparent proxy server > (Squid) for a ceratin IP address range. > > Following are the contents of my ipnat.rules file. > > .... > > Is there an easy way to bypass the proxy server when accessing this one > address? Instead of in the firewall, you can do that with squid: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#head-d82a8d4c42f3600c857cef92d77d76914af54592 In case that URL doesn't work, it's the "Can I make Squid go direct for some sites?" question about the always_direct access list. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:00:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112231065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80D28FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VM0Q7T032076; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:00:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080731165917.0252e640@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:00:17 -0500 To: "Andy Christianson" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <24cec69a0807302008t321cda98t7ff0443f8e4498af@mail.gmail.co m> References: <24cec69a0807291826p6edc2c43ya7aa09b57e8c99ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080730073222.GA48638@ei.bzerk.org> <24cec69a0807300552j4a9a5d26x61077a58415b2043@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730162119.025a8888@mail.computinginnovations.com> <24cec69a0807301545g65a683e1x7e64399bf6e4faea@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191633.0252f4c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <24cec69a0807302008t321cda98t7ff0443f8e4498af@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080731-0, 07/31/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7903/Thu Jul 31 13:51:18 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6VM0Q7T032076 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Heading to dead.letter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:00:35 -0000 At 10:08 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > > > At 05:45 PM 7/30/2008, Andy Christianson wrote: > > > > > > > > Check perms on /var/mail that it is set to 775 > > > > > > -Derek > > > > > > > /var/mail is at 775, so that's not it... > > > > [andy@fbsd ~]$ stat /var/mail > > 89 47105 drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 188185 512 "Jul 30 03:01:51 2008" "Jul 30 > > 16:35:18 2008" "Jul 30 16:35:18 2008" "Feb 24 12:49:40 2008" 4096 4 0 > > /var/mail > > > > > > > > I would kick up the logging on sendmail to see better what is going on and > > where the failure really is. You can add: > > -O LogLevel=80 > > To your sendmail options in /etc/rc.conf > > > > Since root can send mail but regular users cannot, it sounds like a > > permission problem somewhere. > > > > -Derek > > >It turns out that FreeBSD wasn't happy with its host name. I changed it to a >host name that resolves properly, and sendmail began to work as expected. > >Thanks for looking at this. > >-Andy Andy, Sendmail is VERY dns dependent as you found out. Glad all is working fine. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:02:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF4B106566C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D7D8FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1021792rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+Nj509+VJ0riIDWqDcAEJPL8lX1brnkayIDvZfNpN90=; b=jhV9m7w0dTo8uZmGzt5IcJ1PLU1Sl7r3EPTGVz220Gl5d8w9HJddYYuZbxEGcn3sbx WFmam7mW2IRxfOeOCYxsSnzb6+jgGs3l+kmTFhb/V/I5SXo+cE4V6EL6M5tNyC4QFPfQ f9ESpGBQNA4Wp3HyUez04I+ck99EvoCpDm0vY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=uRudNrEgAOulYUv25vCbSVFyrrnU+A3K5xGX9NpYJaghu4tZcgHv2WLtkbhxF4z03B OpSzL2jtzfVX+LRIsBOOTuvYxzex3Ffdx5YKMcHGUUYe3GUXEPByRC5BQkC6I5SVWT8f wEZB8Etd0ySwTakTCaedegN2df+a9ynXv0hLc= Received: by 10.140.203.9 with SMTP id a9mr5557209rvg.203.1217541738090; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.135.3 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54db43990807311502re83ce1ao1a683d6c4e1d01c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:02:18 -0400 From: "Bob Johnson" To: "Jan Henrik Sylvester" In-Reply-To: <48922646.7030902@janh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <29825939.312031217523061419.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> <54db43990807311214g6d6bc1bbm92bf660b10bfbb18@mail.gmail.com> <48922646.7030902@janh.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 250GB hd: Can FreeBSD use >137GB (bios) as Linux or Windows do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:02:19 -0000 On 7/31/08, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > I guess I should have put it more concise as some important details were > lost in the middle of the background story. > > --- The important part: ---> > > If I boot the FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE livefs CD, I have my 232GB hd limited > to 128GB. (According to dmesg and some dd writing tests.) > > If I boot the dynamic drive overlay MBR that changes the INT13 bios > routines and let it boot the livefs CD, FreeBSD can access all 232GB. > > These two cases happen with the same MBR and the same content on the drive. > > <--- (Important part ending) --- > > From my limited understanding: This cannot be about the FreeBSD > installation transfered by firewire, since it is long gone. This cannot > be about the FreeBSD MBR, since it is not involved. This is not about > the partition table, since it is the same. It CAN be about the partition table, at least in principle, although I'd think that if the dmesg says the drive is 128 GB that's probably not what is happening. An invalid partition table can be interpreted differently by different systems (I know that from painful experience), and of course, by different releases of FreeBSD. And Vista in particular seems to like to do strange things to partition tables, FWIW. > > Doing the same with a Linux live CD (Knoppix), I can access the whole > drive in both cases. > > Windows reports 232GB, too, but according to this (German) posting > http://www.acer-userforum.de/thread.php?postid=40207 writing above 128GB > will wrap around for the 855GME chipset driver (I have 855PM). The > posting claims ddo would solve it, which I cannot understand, if the > Windows driver ignores the bios information. (The posting is about Acer > Travelmate 661. I got the 800 from the same time.) > > My laptop is more than five years old and I have got the latest bios for > years, apparently without 48bit LBA. > > I am kind of lost. I cannot understand the disassembled MBR and even if > I could, I do not think I would want to create my own boot manager / > INT13 handler. I guess reading FreeBSD source code would be next... but > I am not very confident there, either. > > The alternative is that my understanding of the problem is totally wrong. > > Thanks for more helping to think through this mess of information I got > during the last day. FreeBSD has to make some educated guesses about what disk geometry to assume: it has to try to make assumptions that will be compatible with what other operating systems are likely to do, so at times it is possible that it will opt for something safe but not "right" in order to balance conflicting information it gets from the BIOS, the partition table, and the drive itself. That's why you have the option of changing its assumptions when you do a sysinstall. What the livefs cd does, I do not know, but the only way you will know what would happen if you installed FreeBSD on, and boot from, that hard drive will be to actually install FreeBSD on that hard drive and see what happens. The one thing I am certain of is that it should have no problem booting from and using a 232 GB drive. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:05:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B29106567C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A448FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VM5TcY032157; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:05:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080731170309.025253a0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:05:21 -0500 To: John Almberg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> References: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080731-0, 07/31/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7903/Thu Jul 31 13:51:18 2008 on betty.computinginnovations.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: m6VM5TcY032157 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:05:37 -0000 At 04:16 PM 7/31/2008, John Almberg wrote: >I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I >do provide a small number of users ftp access. > >Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home >directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log >in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other >users home directories. > >I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? >Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? > >Thanks: John I've used vsftp from the ports. It is very configurable to the point you can even specify which ftp commands to allow. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:23:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DCD1065676 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:23:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (aristotle.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA3F8FC1B for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VMNTZ5096530; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:23:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:23:15 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20080731222315.GB26165@thought.org> References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:23:19 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:57:31PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:39:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > hi people, > > > > a friend gave me two of his old dell keyboards; one of which has > > worked pretty well. trouble is that is it very large-- std?? > > travel-time is just that much more since i am using only my > > left hand. Soooo: i'mm looking for a compact keyboard with > > built-in clicky keys. > > A company named Unicomp now manufactures the "IBM Model-M" keyboard with > the buckling springs (they acquired the patents from Lenovo); > http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/ > > Check out their spacesaver model: > http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/en104bl.html > > I'm thinking of orderding one myself, because I really liked the solid feel > of those old model-M keyboards. thanks forthe url's, roland. i'll fire up kmail and just-click on:-) [[ somebody--was it chess? YES-- mentioned clickykeyvoards.com. wow. i thought hitler was the most hated thing; i'll bet this clickykeyboard.com get lots of hate mail. ]] i'm old enough to remember *before* the ibm-selectric. i knew when i hit a key/spaacebar with those monsters! shook my desk. thanks to everybody! gary > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:34:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AA61065671 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:34:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: from mx1.identry.com (on.identry.com [66.111.0.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6660D8FC12 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:34:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jalmberg@identry.com) Received: (qmail 18400 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2008 22:34:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.110?) (jalmberg@75.127.142.66) by mx1.identry.com with ESMTPA; 31 Jul 2008 22:34:25 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <48922E60.5090908@gmail.com> References: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> <48922E60.5090908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Almberg Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:34:23 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: Re: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:34:26 -0000 > What ftp server software are you using? > > For example, in proftpd, you simply add this line to /usr/local/etc/ > proftpd.conf: > > DefaultRoot ~ > > and everyone is "jailed" into his own directory. > > It also seems the ftp daemon in the base system supports this > through /etc/ftpchroot. > If you are using it, read the man pages for ftpd(8) and ftpchroot(5) > Ah... I knew there had to be a better way. I am using sftp-server. I'm going to try to find some documentation on it right now... Thanks: John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 22:56:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FB11065672 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCCD8FC16 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so372980ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:56:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=f2MWuJU8S0taGClrOkNETGuLM7mhkgKlkq+EWQFET5M=; b=fi6QrM3n2/TSGpuWLlogvZNdbc3Azd/k5/MyRnoWVOHuL0NqBCbXIHflUDSPgKtk8R T21AbMGrjqtKtg5XDwM12bAqr2FMhhynsXp4dmXfFnMEFvBwtp9cbYlD71GtbNQIAbrx +EwI3KdNq249pDGaua33qSYdfrXHPbg8AlxkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=NTMhcCibSQ1+dqkLtyEdnF1kntetLD89RpIQ1zADSkzIbwAfP4mN4XUo7hxJNTlpKi j8mdcqR0NjWU6hm60CiD6p+NUqPx/Ct+anxtbzo4NYaczAZJ79vi7TBvZ3L/RL9QDxph njtIDFKXwQ0frDNAdpf3eJ3LyaXg8m6tnKDP0= Received: by 10.150.192.7 with SMTP id p7mr2080506ybf.91.1217544998740; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm799360yws.5.2008.07.31.15.56.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:56:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:56:34 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807311956.34175.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:56:41 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:57:31 Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:39:17PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > hi people, > > > > a friend gave me two of his old dell keyboards; one of which has > > worked pretty well. trouble is that is it very large-- std?? > > travel-time is just that much more since i am using only my > > left hand. Soooo: i'mm looking for a compact keyboard with > > built-in clicky keys. > > A company named Unicomp now manufactures the "IBM Model-M" keyboard with > the buckling springs (they acquired the patents from Lenovo); > http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/ > > Check out their spacesaver model: > http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/en104bl.html > > I'm thinking of orderding one myself, because I really liked the solid feel > of those old model-M keyboards. > > Roland Roland .. thanks for the url's in here too ! Have you, by any chance, happen to know where can I find one of those clicky keyboards but without the numpad??? I've been trying to get one for ages .. and the only thing I could come up with was this: http://www.fentek-ind.com/minikb.htm#minikb but to make a long story short, I couldn't buy it 'cause getting it sent over here (Argentina) makes the price tag go as up as us$ 199 (S&H + Wire transfer + local taxes ( = 50% of the price tag + S&H)) ... so .. that kb is out of the question for me ... What I'm _exactly_ looking for is the keyboard you can see in here: http://www.openbsd.org/images/newrack.jpg Please, I kindly ask you or anyone in this list, who could provide me with information on that keyboard, to throw me a pointer to where can I buy one of those keyboards (wether new or used, black or beige, PS2 or USB), model, brand or whatever info you might have at the reach of your hands .. I will handle the rest (doing the numbers on how much would it cost me to get it sent over here). Regardless of the outcome: thanks for reading and for the links you threw :) PS: Gary .. take a look at http://www.fentek-ind.com/ .. albeit a little on the pricey side, they have quite a nice line up of keyboards to offer. Hope you can find the keyboard you are looking for :) -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 23:22:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988211065697 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6531B8FC1E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so622795wfg.7 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=Y84hrNzM8ylJ9//4WM90vRd8tVU0Dab+18McNQBwkCc=; b=V6U5rjO8w1KHSHLK9JHrc40lYRWvNIgKmmlzcH2tzKr5dJ9gJE3pkAAsj0Xt1Vxd/W i7alwj1gYqBpx+mOqMnLQzT2XZSjo3EMuF6Q8H0N2vXEgwUtJfvF3JKb9joDYeOLgN1O 7MEJA59NMA9M9QoAf8QMamD04X/NtZD1d+sqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=S3jO//jn1vidy83jypsCroKKwfuIM7uSik6WB7/k3v8WiJsnKOXvD6xGJbQ4vxirlj tvBx4Yp9VJ5GTHDhloPxO8WmweWhLcmtRTLvRESvWIZgfPBzYg8Anevu51IvHWTaQKZ+ H3s9I7wfw820TLvYMLAKDitvf0zC7PwTTD8Y0= Received: by 10.142.157.9 with SMTP id f9mr3464930wfe.311.1217546578047; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.133? ( [210.15.215.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm604936wfa.10.2008.07.31.16.22.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4892494B.50102@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:22:51 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" Subject: Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:22:58 -0000 One last post on this topic... Unless I find a miracle. Justin T. Gibbs, maintainer of the ahd adapter says: "HostRAID arrays are not supported by FreeBSD - it requires a software RAID stack in the OS. XP has that, but we do not." So while ahd can identify the Adaptec card, and the devices attached, FreeBSD cannot utilise the RAID functionality of the card :( I hate definitive answers like this, but at least I know to stop fiddling. Thank you all for your help =^_^= ps. If there are any magicians out there willing to make HostRAID work with FreeBSD I profess my undying love now :p From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 23:37:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019041065682 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5008FC1A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VNc0kw096968; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:37:46 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: David Gurvich Message-ID: <20080731233746.GC26165@thought.org> References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080731170205.43b58bea@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080731170205.43b58bea@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21++ years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:37:52 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:02:05PM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > Hello Roland, > > So you have also been lusting after one of these keyboards? Has anyone > actually ordered and used one of these and what is the opinion on them? > > Thanks > David hi david, i'll report back, either onlist or privately. a hundred bux is a Lot of money for something you can us usually get for around $25. but ifyou figure that you're not only using your hand/writs, butyourshoulders too, it puts thingsin perspective. in fact, in my case, too much typing and mousing wsa what destroyed my left shoulder. probably diff if you've got two hands. maybe i'll waitfor themouse-stick in keyboard, tho... hm, no, maybe not! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 23:45:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A3D1065679 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z.szalbot@lcwords.com) Received: from relay.lc-words.com (relay.lc-words.com [62.121.130.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29248FC0C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z.szalbot@lcwords.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.lc-words.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC6B8033; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:45:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lcwords.com; s=mainlcwords; t=1217547921; bh=6ldXPOCvs9VhJpuDAtDgvemX5C2SbtGyale p2zp6C9c=; h=To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:From:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zn vM5z9TKLoq0myab5tMKHBrVftf1C9cxPot9dE1lXylKPS+xzYYMn6ex1Qn9wHQVurdh Mp0PrWg6cf1X0+EnOkyH0KzLoViUFWz0WKWt8mlJ9fJOT5mvjrA5FKBhWJpT2g8D0Yn v3RwSjhWZMEGAfK9qfvq2aTH0Ev1NcZEH14= Received: from relay.lc-words.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (relay.lc-words.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45353-01; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by relay.lc-words.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8F214B802D; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:45:20 +0200 (CEST) To: Matthew Seaman MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:45:20 +0200 From: In-Reply-To: <48808B9A.8000008@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <487F2525.3030304@lcwords.com> <20080717072023.4b9e1d2f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <487F2D9B.2010407@lcwords.com> <200807170904.26354.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> <487F52EE.2050907@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4880748D.8030902@lcwords.com> <48807DC8.1050007@infracaninophile.co.uk> <48808246.10301@lcwords.com> <48808B9A.8000008@infracaninophile.co.uk> Message-ID: <991e8ad90b6b2e59b1a8b39bda30a6c6@relay.lc-words.com> X-Sender: z.szalbot@lcwords.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log size handling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:45:23 -0000 Hello, > The restart process with apache is that all the child processes are > shutdown -- either straight away (for a plain restart) or once they've > finished their current bit of work (fora graceful restart). As the child > process shuts down, it closes all the file descriptors used for logging. I put two entries in newsyslog.conf. One for rotating all logs at the start of the month, and the other one specifically for the site which gets many hits to rotate its log once it grows more than 25MB in size. /var/log/*-access.log 644 12 * $M1D0 GZC /var/run/httpd.pid 30 /var/log/example.com-access.log 644 100 25000 * ZC /var/run/httpd.pid 30 The log was indeed rotated when it grew larger than the specified size but it was not rotated at the start of the month. Any idea why? Is it so that the first entry effectively eliminates the second? If so, how can I make sure the log does not grow too large and is rotated at the start of the month? Many thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 23:53:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DD41065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85228FC13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4W00F1TAD3E9L1@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:53:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:53:27 -0400 From: David Gurvich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080731195327.6d49e9a8@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Static ip wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:53:48 -0000 Hello, Is there any way using rc.conf and wpa_supplicant.conf that allows a static ip? It's starting to look like I need to write a separate startup script for networking. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 00:41:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BDD106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3067E8FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-1-38.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.1.38]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B695C516DB for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:41:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m710fMKa001594 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:41:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:41:22 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080801024122.d2be8c57.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <48922FD7.8000805@chessgriffin.com> References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <48922FD7.8000805@chessgriffin.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:41:25 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:34:15 -0400, Chess Griffin wrote: > I use an original model M made in the mid 1980's and love it. Same here, too. I'm actually typing this on it (black logo, detachable HIL cable). > You can > still order used and new original Model M's from > http://www.clickykeyboards.com/ including the 84-key space saver model. If I may ask this at this time the topic came up: Is there a manufacturer that sells the "mainframe terminal keyboards" with the two lines (24) function keys and cross cursor control in a PC-compatible variant? I'm talking about something like this: http://www.affirmtech.net/Affirmative_Thin_Client%20.jpg I know Cherry (Auerbach, Oberpfalz, Germany) did sell them many years ago, even other ones with DEC LK250 or POS layout with re-legendable keys (wow!), but they don't seem to be available anymore. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 00:50:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C28A1065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from catalin@starcomms.com) Received: from webmail.starcomms.com (webmail.starcomms.com [41.205.191.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D2638FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from catalin@starcomms.com) Received: from (webmail.starcomms.com [172.16.2.31]) by webmail.starcomms.com with smtp id 525a_94b19d20_5f59_11dd_b718_001143cecab4; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:37:04 +0100 Received: from STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local ([172.16.2.28]) by webmail.starcomms.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:42:56 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:40:50 +0100 Message-ID: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0284D829@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> In-Reply-To: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Controlling read access Thread-Index: AcjzU6BIO5tUk5nGQBquvJwDoWr++AAAfQig References: <26259A11-0CE7-43FB-878C-1A989C1EB006@identry.com> From: "Catalin Miclaus" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2008 23:42:56.0828 (UTC) FILETIME=[2897D7C0:01C8F367] X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Cc: John Almberg Subject: RE: Controlling read access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:50:54 -0000 Hello John, If you are providing only FTP services for those users, perhaps you want to go for an FTP server that handles virtual users. I'm using pure-ftpd and it works great. Google will help you find some nice howto's for same. Best Regards Catalin Miclaus Network/Security ISP-Data Starcomms Ltd. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Almberg Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:17 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Controlling read access=20 I operate a server on which I am typically the only ssh user, but I =20 do provide a small number of users ftp access. Each user has their own home directory. Currently all home =20 directories have read permission set for 'other'. This means if I log =20 in as one user, I can read and even download the contents of other =20 users home directories. I want to block this read access. What is the best way to do this? =20 Turn off the read bit for 'other'? Or is there some better way? Thanks: John _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message (including any atta= chments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it b= y mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and permanently delet= e this message and any attachments from your system. Any form of dissemin= ation, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of this message in = whole or in part is strictly prohibited if you are not the intended recip= ient of this e-mail. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. = STARCOMMS PLC shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmis= sion of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay= in its receipt or damage to your system. STARCOMMS PLC does not guarante= e that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that th= is communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interferences. STAR= COMMS PLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications, whethe= r related to the business of STARCOMMS or not, through its internal or ex= ternal networks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 01:16:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D91065670 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC5A8FC1D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 6976 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 20:16:34 -0500 Received: from 203-166-248-146.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (203.166.248.146) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 20:16:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:16:28 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801111628.70e8367f@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <87k5f242by.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> <87k5f242by.fsf@kobe.laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:16:32 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:49 +0300 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > It's certainly possible. The OpenBSD team did this when they split off > NetBSD. The Dragonfly BSD folks have done it already when they branched > from FreeBSD 4.X. So you can definitely do it. But you should probably > understand a lot about the way the system works before doing that, and > changing just the "uname" output is not enough. there is also the other side of the coin, that of user-land apps that parse the output of uname to handle things in different ways. It may not be the best way to do things , but it's done quite a bit. Of course, this is be irrelevant if you plan to have a completely locked up OS .... And there is also all the other software that is bundled in base, openssh, comes to mind: $ nc -v localhost 22 Connection to localhost 22 port [tcp/ssh] succeeded! SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.5p1 FreeBSD-20061110 .... and man pages, and doc, B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Two things have come out of Berkeley, Unix and LSD. It is uncertain which caused the other. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 01:18:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78016106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341288FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 7100 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 20:18:22 -0500 Received: from 203-166-248-146.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (203.166.248.146) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 20:18:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:18:16 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801111816.6e277b1d@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "no toe capability on..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:18:20 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:09:21 +0200 Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > Today I updated kernel & system on one of my machines (FreeBSD > 7.0). After the update which ran absolutely smooth I'm seeing spurious > messages both on the console and in /var/log/messages like the > following: > > no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 +1 , different address: no toe capability on 0xc48e3800 bge0: mem 0xb0200000-0xb020ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > Grep-ing through the sources I found the above message to come from > /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c. As far as I understand this has > something to do with TcpOffloadEngine. yup > > Please note that this is a box several years old (2GHz P4) with three > Intel FXP FastEthernet-cards. > > So here are my questions: > > o) Has anybody else seen the above messages? > > o) Can they safely be ignored? > > o) If not - what can I do to get rid of them? > they seem harmless enough. B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 01:18:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2831106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YM=c11d932a@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B356D8FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YM=c11d932a@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD04E163F5F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E715023E409 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:02:36 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801020236.4ea7058c@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: <207569.19851217533049107.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Bypassing Transparent Proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:18:49 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jay Hall wrote: > >> > Is there an easy way to bypass the proxy server when accessing this > > one address? > > Instead of in the firewall, you can do that with squid: > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#head-d82a8d4c42f3600c857cef92d77d76914af54592 > > In case that URL doesn't work, it's the "Can I make Squid go direct > for some sites?" question about the always_direct access list. That makes squid itself go direct, bypassing other caches in the hierarchy, but the access is still going through squid. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 01:37:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6751C1065674 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from holgerdanske.com (holgerdanske.com [65.19.145.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B9CC8FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dpchrist@holgerdanske.com) Received: from a64x23800p ([64.142.42.100]) by holgerdanske.com for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:19:19 -0700 From: "David Christensen" To: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:19:21 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 Thread-Index: AcjzdHH/e1/okLUNS+GnDOHeEFBlSg== Subject: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:37:45 -0000 freebsd-questions: I have a FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE i386 computer, category 5E cabling, and a Netgear GS108 Gigabit switch. The machine currently hosts CVS, and I plan to add FTP and mirroring eventually. I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) to the computer and was wondering what cards other people are using and how they liked them. Any comments and/or recommendations would be appreciated. TIA, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:04:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B9A106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289DB8FC1D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so395976ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=g1WjL73IoRCnzMChKLn8YeOmjfh9Znk1tNsGH7zd7lQ=; b=IjnGrScvykbLk7Qgr44HTj0SSVe7trYLcNgCzQRyjzuodwTN9/6bOTE2to7RH9uahU i0b7K92Zk6XVkWdeJrWPfaBKM7ngFsArDKq3qSzoGH0y7N3XvJumG+NmlI91K4ikIOuo mGfoc1RhoetGqVCAL0O11TgsoAdRW2sFvim4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=WOQ6rmuxxF7N1yZZ3b+MrFhEd+W3EOTXALWvi8tNasCnKjkkErBgH1EBe3maLbaseR 62LITl6lo95ocsqHXSnmqae2dYHbowgFpPE3zz6TjtskuYAKaF59apVe3cz36mLMTs4N j1C0vGaJ3TwDhuTwOCg1R2p0/MdxwF3b59P14= Received: by 10.150.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr2284660ybz.47.1217556256378; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1120136ywi.1.2008.07.31.19.04.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:04:11 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:04:17 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 22:19:21 David Christensen wrote: > freebsd-questions: > > I have a FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE i386 computer, category 5E cabling, and a > Netgear GS108 Gigabit switch. The machine currently hosts CVS, and I plan > to add FTP and mirroring eventually. > > > I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) to > the computer and was wondering what cards other people are using and how > they liked them. Any comments and/or recommendations would be appreciated. re0 in here re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x81361019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 "re -- RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe Ethernet adapter driver" Works like a charm. No complains :) -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:04:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F12F106567E for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D421C8FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so669381wfg.7 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hlbojuecnXMoURnUKyqrmY7z1r8MH15+Tr9/MD+uoXo=; b=WnTf9EyOPsxm9WmoYQXEMvogbbWcqlAE9h/yoO6v6PCdBze37IuTxiIONeWqBlpHbY AMkLwGEO1keyBwf0Q00d0l2fLzTWReUr6Pcy2o4jYopTCLEzaYV5AgbtCmjXlTkM2VYK aBDcPnJBaQSLSYi4PrP9r11+xcaF2171KQQyU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ZyX8UZ3TUemkwxYLR536LzZMudnNrYxvJBkpajsaPV8tJoPBFveOQOWAq/Jzz+xv8L Q3qWVv0/p566VNrbZpqnCoQVjVO3QWrn1u7bCXkSSj0I4H6xx3Ax69GmXdCvOaeR0FZp rKwbwps7CwerVv7NcyakAbXRTt+TDELqG+WRg= Received: by 10.142.154.20 with SMTP id b20mr3522506wfe.59.1217556268654; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.19 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660807311904l45537647v5330c9a499882393@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:04:28 -0600 From: Modulok To: "David Christensen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:04:30 -0000 > I have a FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE i386 computer, category 5E cabling, and a > Netgear GS108 Gigabit switch. The machine currently hosts CVS, and I plan > to add FTP and mirroring eventually. > > I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) to the > computer and was wondering what cards other people are using and how they > liked them. Any comments and/or recommendations would be appreciated. Intel PWLA8391GTBLK, available on newegg for under $25 (USD). I've been running two of these on a FreeBSD 6 machine for about a year now, with zero problems. The use the em(4) driver, written by Intel. On a side note, I did have problems with the Netgear GS108 line of switches, where they would completely lock up at random intervals when daisy chained together. (This was not caused by the Intel network cards.) When not connected to one-another they seem to be stable, as I still two of these with no problems. Best of luck. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:05:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D3A1065670 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: from cp23.myhostcenter.com (s23.n241.vds2000.com [64.6.241.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1CA8FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38991 helo=kitchetech.com) by cp23.myhostcenter.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KOjhz-0006Eh-KP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:45:31 -0400 Received: from 129.44.246.121 ([129.44.246.121]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user kitche@kitchetech.com) by kitchetech.com with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:45:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2456.129.44.246.121.1217555131.squirrel@kitchetech.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:45:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew Donovan" To: "Martin Laabs" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp23.myhostcenter.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - kitchetech.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compile firefox with debug symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:05:11 -0000 > Hi, > > I have some problems with firefox (it just don't > start - as well as openoffice.) I think it is a > broken lib - but though I recompiled all the libs > it still does not work. > Now I'll do it the right way and use gdb but until > now I had no success compiling a binary of firefox > (or regxpcom which also hangs) with debug symbols > > I tried " make DEBUG=on LOGGING=on" but this produced > also only the stripped binaries. > > So - how can I build firefox (form the ports) with > debug symbols? > > Thank you, > Martin L. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This is how to do it cd /usr/ports/www/firefox2 or 3 and make config and select the Debug option From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:45:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014C11065677 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19858FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m712ju3X013092; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:45:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m712juhR013089; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:45:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:45:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: RW In-Reply-To: <20080801020236.4ea7058c@gumby.homeunix.com.> Message-ID: References: <207569.19851217533049107.JavaMail.javamailuser@localhost> <20080801020236.4ea7058c@gumby.homeunix.com.> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:45:57 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bypassing Transparent Proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:45:58 -0000 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, RW wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:57:26 -0600 (MDT) > Warren Block wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jay Hall wrote: >> >>>> Is there an easy way to bypass the proxy server when accessing this >>> one address? >> >> Instead of in the firewall, you can do that with squid: >> >> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid#head-d82a8d4c42f3600c857cef92d77d76914af54592 >> >> In case that URL doesn't work, it's the "Can I make Squid go direct >> for some sites?" question about the always_direct access list. > > That makes squid itself go direct, bypassing other caches in the > hierarchy, but the access is still going through squid. Oh. Sorry. All right, I know squid can do it, but can't remember how. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:49:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BE71065675 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A778FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1164046rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ro4t+kr/gHgPtuWptgoCceuG65rXjbNbiyH0G9SjiIE=; b=jq6Lw9sIxBluM9pCnq+WB0Jjn0b1jFMk8iQx8wTuKXN1hj4m0TOnK+fE5onFsDu4iQ HhkWKGZ/nnzxaPjFmmsZTkGgoTsnIsTCb4j/kxlgNd8igbQGFqE26FRtdb0V9uOULMCd DjgjnGZ95PyhJ3Y7fZl01B88RufX8KTP33NE8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=o0tyYbNiqvUymZlE3tEqernBpBwPqCF7A9/XDB4q/McopMrf8Fq90tYsqw2I/7Hnzf oiSOVd78Dc6FZp6y6vbNb9nvVg9L5OjPlN01Ssmjmjz2BpgYcxprzaLLMY6mELwvPrwv +T8LZP2ndxkvqZPg8HqRwuc51jDVotOduJsTA= Received: by 10.141.132.8 with SMTP id j8mr5660222rvn.297.1217558962253; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.77.2 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:49:22 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080730123201.3219ed25@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080730123201.3219ed25@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Imposible to update/upgrade ports.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:49:23 -0000 2008/7/30 Gerard > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:53:21 -0300 > Agus wrote: > > >Hi guys, > > > >I'v been delaying the installed ports upgrade cause i was testing my > >server and now that it it in production i wanted to upgrade them and > >find it impossible... > > > >I am running > > uname -a > >FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: > >Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007 > > > >I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then > >installed portmanager and portsaudit.... > > > >did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, like sec, mysql and > >more.... > > > >Now while trying to update with > > > >portmanager sysutils/rsync -l -ui -f > >#Then also tried without the f > > > >get this errors: > >--------------------------------- > > > >portmanager 0.4.1_9 > > > > perl-5.8.8_1 /lang/perl5.8 > > make Strike 2 > > > >it gets like its looping while updating perl.... > >For what i saw, portmanager seems to try to update all dependencies > >too..and is failing in that.... > > > >Something similar happened while trying to update apache22 > > > >Its my first try updating/upgrading ports...and it was hard to find a > >doc explaining this....i mean..there are lots of docs but each with > >different methods... > > > >Well, hope you can give me a jhand.. > > I use portmanager myself occasionally. They this: > > 1) Update your ports tree > 2) Run: portmanager -u -l -y -p > > If it fails again, look in the log file (/var/log/portmanager.log) and > see what it says. You can post the error message back here. > > > -- > Gerard > gerard@seibercom.net > > Convention is the ruler of all. > > Pindar > Hi mate, I update the ports tree with cvsup ports-file... all ok but when i did portmanager -u -l -y -p i starts, but then it has to remove some ports and one of that ports is portmanager itself so it cores.....:( so weird...Its really difficult to update the ports....i dont even wanna know to pass to rel 7.... Dunno how to do it really... Will have to remove all ports installed and then update ports and reinstall them? what would happen to my confs...? Thanks, Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 02:59:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243FD1065670 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15E18FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2008 22:59:18 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OXB20095; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:59:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2008 22:59:16 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18578.31748.337951.8423@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:59:16 -0400 To: "David Christensen" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:59:19 -0000 David Christensen writes: > I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card > (NIC) to the computer and was wondering what cards other people > are using and how they liked them. Any comments and/or > recommendations would be appreciated. Realtek-based cards were mentioned; they seem to do well under light to moderate loads, but not so well when the going gets tough. Intel-based cards, on the other hand, have a superior track record; probably doesn't hurt the driver is maintained by Intel. I replaced an re() card with a Pro/1000 dual port, and watched errors drop from ~1% to _0_ in 11 days of moderate to heavy usage. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 03:05:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68461065681 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2DF8FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so1013360ana.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:05:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YIjDVtaJHmm/S3mG8H+jyGOUOSiDB+P28xSBAEAbJUU=; b=Qa0JX9GZBwsV2aG/uWUW0PqCvTZhTZ/G89NnnHERKOIclq0+8pInuPsp6NeINwbiyr J1+NS4Gsq+vyP6jCj2OdexKpC07uXNYa8paBw4KQm2X7OONzTB2bITy5EBpwphg5t4k0 NgcyF0DDX2E73eh/yq9jl2kte5YT3QlrDafEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=iM6Xpp2qN8nNsD7aEpwLQ3Av1D+ghgpMyN7zBC+fB03bQgyCPnVIsDokpVygqPrdMO Ej3HFoKyuEQTfEYAQZTEX4K8FnrLiuE8LLJLQfi4GVQ6JaYXFWvUDLR58025Lh2TjP5T l00n8676qbyONMwBr7runnymlI6q+k8EUah9Y= Received: by 10.100.136.15 with SMTP id j15mr15908662and.11.1217559958390; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807312005l42c617ex50826fe6aad0de6d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:05:58 -0400 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: "Markus Mueller" In-Reply-To: <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4891256E.6090903@yahoo.de> <20080731075515.c0f01099.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4891B48E.9090907@yahoo.de> Cc: Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: own OS-Name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:05:59 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Markus Mueller wrote: > > the command "uname" must get these information from a file. > in which file are these informations ? > i can editing this file simply with my own informations and my "OS" based on > FREEBSD. > this can be the solution of my problem. Compiling a custom kernel I do not believe qualifies as your own BSD OS. I think you have to branch it like OpenBSD & DragonFlyBSD e.t.c. It's not that easy to do. -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 03:10:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97563106567D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3EB8FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so403422ywe.13 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:10:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=egiA/pP9o4NyrHHh1/3MpYeQM4XSe4j+b5cz5G+WZuQ=; b=llnSR7gR13yatUWvOPZeVqB94+Rf7EmjnWoVyq+MI1h7ORZbCvO3aHef3dH0hrAmrm WVu0Bz7UEXfqHrF/dz7CQYnrOiUTMyUa+WlTN51cC/TE5glWb6C87gaJx8qJTcnq3GUA S7Z+dfRF5GhrEhR8YmyQFnmTEKQR5h4+E1oWo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=vurKhHmiV0nj+xHavBSbKhZiEhQB36o7Z0u2nH4VBK3xQICiFJUL5yspUPFfPrSMJq QD6u9xajMwn4+x6Niw7SFz8Lxs6WPlBbPEHEveyzcDwY4OyvfN9y0AsMObPDXHXulnDS Pa/tneRzVYWf5o2Q6mJxnk+tbh7iGoaG8v2fw= Received: by 10.151.111.15 with SMTP id o15mr2362842ybm.7.1217560232394; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm974362ywf.2.2008.07.31.20.10.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:10:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:10:28 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <18578.31748.337951.8423@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18578.31748.337951.8423@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808010010.28280.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:10:33 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 23:59:16 Robert Huff wrote: > David Christensen writes: > > I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card > > (NIC) to the computer and was wondering what cards other people > > are using and how they liked them. Any comments and/or > > recommendations would be appreciated. > > Realtek-based cards were mentioned; they seem to do well under > light to moderate loads, but not so well when the going gets tough. > Intel-based cards, on the other hand, have a superior track > record; probably doesn't hurt the driver is maintained by Intel. I > replaced an re() card with a Pro/1000 dual port, and watched errors > drop from ~1% to _0_ in 11 days of moderate to heavy usage. Thanks for that info Robert ! Will take it into consideration next time I buy a NIC :) You just probably turned me into Pro/1000 ;) -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 03:54:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311EF1065675 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013098FC16 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1190958rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:54:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=f5gNfK7hfEtVrrzVVfRN7mdZO/DxbEWGI0fpeyn9NvU=; b=l1HmX3d3bsO3yZ9MdyAWrChA8X/qqB71oB9U4W5lp7INjLk7fCmj6JxygxjImS+iD6 N2TUIG+iP2ctpRTH/USvbKhZlZjXfAAnov1GyeUKKsTU+r3FCg4iuVad+ZavluKlKNQw R8SOaK0YQU9pEfywnh0UsiWNsQAuAhJovTmoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lXnN8UXuAbqpciMywd/4nC2KVtiwCvzyha+9Kwdih0RgsLvVPQXzKOAXaAzSPlRDzf 93Hyix/RiPSn54SBVX+pB7omh7vWdHZUmSvn9csaC4b6WoOv9bHCvQoxH500HpNBn5rh lCSvLHnlyWObLCKHQF0Zv1Pi9VdaBEF8KVkFQ= Received: by 10.140.191.14 with SMTP id o14mr5698948rvf.130.1217562842488; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.114.16 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0807312054i7b3ca5f1x19f4899ef5a638c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:54:02 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: "Nikos Vassiliadis" In-Reply-To: <200807301806.04141.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> <200807301239.59573.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <8e10486b0807300656j54a6fb31p65add890fd00bc8c@mail.gmail.com> <200807301806.04141.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:54:03 -0000 On 7/30/08, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:56:23 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > On 7/30/08, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:51:52 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > > > Hi list, (I already ask this on -net, but I get no answers) > > > > > > > > I have two 100Mbit link (L2L, lan to lan) between the company and > > > > our datacenter, on each side I have two redudant (pf+carp) > > > > firewalls. > > > > > > > > I configured one vlan for each 100Mbit link and used carp to do > > > > the failover between machines on each side, the vlan interfaces are > > > > configured without ip address (with Max's > > > > carpdev patch), only carp interfaces have ips. > > > > > > > > I want to use OpenOSPFD to distribute our internal routes and do > > > > automatic failover+loadbalance of this two 100Mbit links. > > > > > > > > This work ? Someone have a similar setup ? Any hints ? > > > > > > I think using OSPF and CARP on the same interface could have > > > unexpected results. > > > > I see some examples > > > You get to have two ways to forward packet to a destination. > One via CARP and one via OSPF. I think it's a possible source > of errors. > > > > > > > I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy > > > and load balancing. Do you have to use OSPF? > > > That is, is there an OSPF domain in which you have to be part of? > > > > I use CARP for firewall redundancy on each side. I want to use OSPF to > > easy distribute routes on my networks, the failover and load balance > > of the links are a desirable plus. > > > So, there is an OSPF domain besides the four FreeBSD firewalls, right? Is what I want to configure.... > > Could you provide your network's topology? > Is it something like: > LAN1----CLUSTER1====CLUSTER2----LAN2 > where: > CLUSTER1 = CARP(FW1, FW2) > CLUSTER2 = CARP(FW3, FW4) Local Network Datacenter Network FW1 (master) FW3(master) Link1(100Mbit) (10.0.0.49/30) carp206 <------------------------------> carp20 (10.0.0.50/30) (10.0.0.45/30) carp207 <------------------------------> carp30 (10.0.0.46/30) Link2 (100Mbit) FW2 (slave) FW4(slave) Yes, in my setup I want to do failover of the firewalls (if FW1 crash FW2 assume the two links, firewall rules,etc) and loadbalance+failover of two 100Mbit links (I want to use the two links together (100+100) and if one of then fail all the traffic be routed to another) The firewalls failover this is working great with Carp. My difficulties is to configure OpenOSPFD to distribute routes in this setup, the links failover+loadbalance comes naturally after ospf running. > For example, in the above diagram you cannot load > balance the traffic, it will always go through the > same routers: > FW1 and FW3 or > FW1 and FW4 or > FW2 and FW3 or > FW2 and FW4. > > It will of course failover in case of a FW failure. Yes. Only one firewall is master on each side. > > > > I would use CARP on the "lan to lan" link to provide redundancy > > and load balancing. > > > So, my suggestion above is false, at least with the current > CARP on FreeBSD. > > Please supply more info about your setup, I hope that you understand, if not I can draw something more detailed. Thank you for your time. Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 04:15:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2E41065670 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Fraser@bacardi.frase.id.au) Received: from bacardi.frase.id.au (203-219-142-174.static.tpgi.com.au [203.219.142.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5196C8FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Fraser@bacardi.frase.id.au) Received: from bacardi.frase.id.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bacardi.frase.id.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m713vKre036655; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:57:20 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from Fraser@bacardi.frase.id.au) Received: (from Fraser@localhost) by bacardi.frase.id.au (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m713vHQC036652; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:57:17 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from Fraser) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:57:17 +1000 From: Fraser Tweedale To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801035716.GA28414@bacardi.frase.id.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de Subject: Re: Compile firefox with debug symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:15:05 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:00:53PM +0200, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have some problems with firefox (it just don't > start - as well as openoffice.) I think it is a > broken lib - but though I recompiled all the libs > it still does not work. > Now I'll do it the right way and use gdb but until > now I had no success compiling a binary of firefox > (or regxpcom which also hangs) with debug symbols >=20 > I tried " make DEBUG=3Don LOGGING=3Don" but this produced > also only the stripped binaries. >=20 > So - how can I build firefox (form the ports) with > debug symbols? >=20 > Thank you, > Martin L. WITH_DEBUG is the variable you're interested in. It must be defined, so something like: `make WITH_DEBUG=3Dyes install` should do the trick. Cheers, frase --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSiZwACgkQPw/2FZbemTWmvQCfZsc3X55MlcUA/fKtMCm9DvYd tx4Aniwe+pk6znxyUS/OynZ+6vjhGbfQ =b98m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 04:26:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27D106566C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2FB8FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1201094rvf.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:26:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=9Ocy1hQYZwoxXZ/wm9sIRPaJZRAlnGbFz60dRkxT2y8=; b=DB4tX6h9KO3LpY8aPkzqZoxnMXiDyuL9M7iyc4un3sfLXOqg4O+NLVMdnnpYullvJL J1+LYsV//rEGwqKRlHWUIUDrZ/Tf04FOEr9wnIuyOE9DQM6JYXIm3coWeWC4CisH1IBv S7NdXgD0ufucZIqttJPcbssVfx+d5Oi1gfZQk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=c9vgP535yeojeRbiUBlMpYVallZf+oktJn85oD+StN18/aMIob5FnptS+Jo6pfa3o/ iQqlPYlbDonTMYS0f0fz7q3ioMaLoiEuX+xzZdwfiQtFfFOyEM5SdLUm764Ebz5uRXPx d4kI7+bzyq/P30g+yTTpJiAS6jRbXo07jAtSo= Received: by 10.141.210.13 with SMTP id m13mr5713304rvq.25.1217564761770; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sniper ( [71.221.191.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm916942rvb.4.2008.07.31.21.26.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:26:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Falanga To: "Barry Byrne" Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:25:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200807301835.17740.af300wsm@gmail.com> <000801c8f2f0$3a49ff60$72010c0a@wbt.wbtsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <000801c8f2f0$3a49ff60$72010c0a@wbt.wbtsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807312225.57211.af300wsm@gmail.com> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Having some problems with a FreeBSD mail server (SMTP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:26:02 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 03:31:36 Barry Byrne wrote: > > Andrew: > > I've seen a similar problem from time to time with Outlook 2003 clients. > For seemingly no reason whatsoever, they give a timeout sending mail. > Googling the error code throws up many with the same error and no solution > that I've found. Telneting to port 25 or even running the Outlook test mail > account feature still work, while Outlook comlains it can't send. > > The workaround is to quit Outlook and start again. By quitting Outlook, the > user must choose 'exit' from the 'file' menu. Simply closing the close box > still leaves Outlook in memory and the problem remains. The problem seems > to happen perhaps once or twice a month for some users. > > Regards, > > Barry To everyone who responded, Thanks for the great suggestions. A couple of you replied that they've seen issues with this and resolved them by closing down Outlook, by the "File --> Exit" method rather than the "X" in the upper right. I'm really beginning to suspect this because the pastor I was working with told me that our senior pastor explained to him that he could send from a particular coffee shop in town when he couldn't from church. Though I can't personally see a down side to having an office in a Starbucks (I don't know the name of the actual shop they were in), I think that the Outlook client get's some bad stuff in the cache that is flushed out when they shutdown their computers to go make the journey. The pastor I was dealing with said he went there and all of this mail sent without a hitch. The other possibility is that the ISP is blocking some particular port. We did just change ISP's within the last 2 weeks and according to this pastor, these sending problems originated at that time. We'll see. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 06:05:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34F91065671 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7E58FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7165ki3085927; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:05:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F4B6BA98; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:05:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:05:46 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20080801060546.GA71969@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080731203912.GA5364@thought.org> <20080731205731.GA56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <48922FD7.8000805@chessgriffin.com> <20080801024122.d2be8c57.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080801024122.d2be8c57.freebsd@edvax.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: keyboard!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:05:57 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:41:22AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:34:15 -0400, Chess Griffin wrote: > > I use an original model M made in the mid 1980's and love it. >=20 > Same here, too. I'm actually typing this on it (black logo, > detachable HIL cable). >=20 >=20 > > You can=20 > > still order used and new original Model M's from=20 > > http://www.clickykeyboards.com/ including the 84-key space saver model. >=20 > If I may ask this at this time the topic came up: Is there a > manufacturer that sells the "mainframe terminal keyboards" with > the two lines (24) function keys and cross cursor control in > a PC-compatible variant? Is this what you're looking for? http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/122keyterkey.html =20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiSp7oACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVQpACfYV0RqvUa0kuQN+QI4e2Z2VxA j3YAn2q1lHqvQm1Brd/bbe4PxmJ/32Qb =i8E4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 06:07:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6B31065674 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443678FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289F5C26; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:58:02 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4892A49C.7080902@hdk5.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:52:28 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gonzalo Nemmi References: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:07:43 -0000 Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: > On Thursday 31 July 2008 22:19:21 David Christensen wrote: >> freebsd-questions: >> >> I have a FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE i386 computer, category 5E cabling, and a >> Netgear GS108 Gigabit switch. The machine currently hosts CVS, and I plan >> to add FTP and mirroring eventually. >> >> >> I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) to >> the computer and was wondering what cards other people are using and how >> they liked them. Any comments and/or recommendations would be appreciated. > > re0 in here > > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x81361019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > > "re -- RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe Ethernet adapter driver" > > Works like a charm. > No complains :) > Aloha, I have 12 of the Trendnet Branded Realteck 8169 nic cards in use here. No problems and good speed. -- ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* - 8.* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 06:53:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361DF1065678 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net (lk.84.20.249.154.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net [84.20.249.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2918FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC4D2289F; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:48:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (delusion.skoberne.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89471-03; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.15.2] (simian.skoberne.local [192.168.15.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nejkopejko@skoberne.net) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0562283B; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:48:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4892B1C0.2060401@skoberne.net> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:48:32 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Baldwin References: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> In-Reply-To: <4890F1D9.7090900@studsvik.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD based mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:53:58 -0000 Hello, > mailserver. However, never having done this before myself, I was > wondering if anyone here > had any useful comments about this guide, particularly if you think it's > missing any key points > that will leave me cursing at my monitor late one night. > I'm currently planning on using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE, although I'm > certainly open to > sugegstions if people think a different version would serve better. I am running a dozen of such installations and I have to say that the guide is great (also since the author has provided Maia Mailguard FreeBSD port). There were some things that I had to do in order to make it work for me (you can ask me privately if you stumble upon problems), but in general it is OK. Also, if you decide to use RoundCube as webmail, you can check my PostfixAdmin-RoundCube "bridge" (although still in development, but it should work) - http://nejc.skoberne.net/rcpfa . HTH, Nejc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 06:54:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400F4106568B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from pop3.ihlas.net.tr (smtp.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 664278FC26 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 51682 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2008 06:54:14 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff-II-2.1 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Received: from unknown (HELO ihlasnetym) (maslak@ihlas.net.tr@213.238.150.220) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 06:54:13 -0000 Message-ID: <001601c8f3a3$6f552910$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> From: "Yavuz Maslak" To: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:54:24 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How to update from 7.0-stable-200805 to 7.0-stable-200807 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:54:18 -0000 I use 7.0-STABLE-200805.=20 I want to update it to 7.0-STABLE-200807. How do I update for the last updates clearly ? is there a way to update without reboot the machine or with only one = reboot ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 07:28:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF24A106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF0C8FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m717SHIF005691; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m717SHOj005688; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Gonzalo Nemmi In-Reply-To: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080801092757.N5640@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:28:26 -0000 > > re0 in here > > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x81361019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > > "re -- RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe Ethernet adapter driver" > > Works like a charm. > No complains :) > lots of versions of this chip are buggy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 07:29:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ED21065671 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E358FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:29:21 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:29:21 +0200 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m717TKPm004320; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:29:20 +0200 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m717TK6b004319; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:29:20 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:29:20 +0200 From: Ewald Jenisch To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20080801072920.GB3159@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2008 07:29:21.0075 (UTC) FILETIME=[50811030:01C8F3A8] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2008_08_01_09_29_21 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "no toe capability on..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:29:23 -0000 On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:13:29AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > > Looks like it. They're debug messages that shouldn't still be in there. > They were removed in version 1.2 but then reappeared in 1.4.2.1: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.diff?r1=1.1;r2=1.2 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.diff?r1=1.4;r2=1.4.2.1 > > Thanks for locating the source of the problem. I entered a PR (#126138) > but forgot to put in a pointer to your message--and now can't, since the > PR database claims #126138 doesn't exist. I'll try again later. > Hi Warren, Wow that was really fast - thanks much for filing a PR! ...good to know that this message is just for debug and relatively harmless... Kind regards, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 07:47:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C671065673 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0CE8FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:47:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1122600fgb.35 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YddU41Lyygk60OjTfFuIsLekYTcQjcJGNJUKd8Bw3to=; b=qXEU2XTOmXjKBhnTsVJx8POBQjXd46IRWbOuwFbEESBnOnfiIxnxJCHehFnpBl/Bmq tiyirFo0MlDNmTuUR0IddqEzU+5lc8zWgSB6m7JcUgAATRAY/nStnNlzqZCm7VikLG1z /ystRa3f1BN1HTWW26OqEPpHuP1AHPSks9oFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lfogdUlBQK6SHhsaefFatf8gsKdaoTUxHeDgEeWmOvX6miVqmFBX5KC6/lFws6mdLO XRvHaHsv9NstTRlq8lStlBs9wwbCvIh9yRDDvdM1YiFHC5g5LZeNeD8FG4XlGEu5hReP IOhvBIbQUW1kZ821vUxAhqxvrHYnNQfeqjOU4= Received: by 10.86.51.10 with SMTP id y10mr7023611fgy.6.1217576854223; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pegasus-v.dyndns.org ( [87.203.73.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm299198fge.3.2008.08.01.00.47.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4892BF91.6030205@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:47:29 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yavuz Maslak References: <001601c8f3a3$6f552910$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> In-Reply-To: <001601c8f3a3$6f552910$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to update from 7.0-stable-200805 to 7.0-stable-200807 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:47:36 -0000 Yavuz Maslak wrote: > I use 7.0-STABLE-200805. > > I want to update it to 7.0-STABLE-200807. > > How do I update for the last updates clearly ? > > is there a way to update without reboot the machine or with only one reboot ? > > > Use csup to synchronize your source: - Copy the file /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile to your home dir (run commands as root or with sudo) - Edit and change default host to a mirror near you ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#HANDBOOK-MIRRORS-CHAPTER-SGML-CENTRAL-CVSUP ) - csup -g -L2 stable-supfile - Follow these instructions to rebuild your system: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html You will need to reboot twice, once after you install the kernel and a second time when you install world, after the final mergemaster step. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 07:52:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E11106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24DF8FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so428694ywe.13 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=c4FBZBV9WDiKCA48Zdt2VY0Lx1F/LFixzRXN1hFPHDU=; b=g26QB8cQRrrxmQU88KsCaudP7gUX0iF4xSL7aw5R9dQeDCZrMRIahfbVv8H0/Bwk/2 05GGtVThAbmGRTnSXun4U7L8tpNrg9ynEQ2BL89J1DMgAlWeLRZwdnx5AVkKSMaue2fE uyidL/iY5yG4Sl5zmbr0IG4Itr/uGvldQvl1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=qFgGwEjMLKGTU/X6yM1mhZZX91dE9XrrrrvZ5+rbL9cP4keHLqaDurpIhtS1HwkZel 4luSvxxhsYGJByQR/aRlPKmL8fHqqla/j2slzTEYls4/4BJ3NWvbBnjxoHhnDtHFsUiX gj1LZmHMq+3lcp5YzTo/sFnoAw/5aEcj4edxg= Received: by 10.150.49.1 with SMTP id w1mr2751587ybw.26.1217577133686; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1669098ywi.1.2008.08.01.00.52.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:52:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:52:08 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20080801092757.N5640@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080801092757.N5640@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808010452.08875.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:52:15 -0000 On Friday 01 August 2008 04:28:17 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > re0 in here > > > > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x81361019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x01 > > hdr=0x00 > > > > "re -- RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe Ethernet adapter > > driver" > > > > Works like a charm. > > No complains :) > > lots of versions of this chip are buggy. Mmmmm Good to know ... Couple that with Roberts advise and you guys just put me on the lookout for a new NIC. Will follow Robert's advice and look for an Intel one. Robert, could you please pinpoint an Intel card for me? One that can be buyed boxed .. stand alone NIC? (nowadays the only way to get NIC seems to be by buying one with a motherboard attached to it). Thanks a lot for the advices guys :) -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 08:06:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ABC106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AE48FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so430038ywe.13 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=YQkbqaRajgmUUHn7ngOmgGJl9F8KmhBQ83U0pKN0g0c=; b=T4VVe/CDzHovjIYhGyraoSg64T1n+Yv2BQpSSLPfmGlF5RurIMgGNyYW5WGorRunIH rKa8XQA5gjOyUZq3SQ2x+/0dcpfBrYan+av1cpTl6nyPfqKTTRkMb/a2l+q9QH6Ovv/K d3rAvP+q7CDVTbAdyxuC0UJp/1p4gmEPnpnU4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=sTuO6rQs3Nuu79J1Uf/raa1aeGcDVqW4EOeDsdoK4M0v+nJIfELntI/+d4+J3mYqVm yUw6OGRzWeuW0fhjcjEWNf7OeRYaimPJb2aMr7TfzUc7fAxYdJgHcAC5KkguRJqcbn2L q5xCbRyvajFnPOqlFxKESE8huFsdI08igQRBU= Received: by 10.150.83.22 with SMTP id g22mr2769034ybb.134.1217577981083; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1678670ywp.3.2008.08.01.01.06.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:06:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:06:15 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808010506.16001.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: KDE choppy sound (System Notificactions only) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:06:22 -0000 Quite simple and straight forward. [gonzalo@inferna ~]% uname -a FreeBSD inferna.inferna.com.ar 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Jul 20 03:44:42 ART 2008 root@inferna.inferna.com.ar:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/INFERNA i386 [gonzalo@inferna ~]% Sound system and driver are built into my kernel. Sound works like a charm in here (Amarok for ogg/mp3, Kaffeine for videos, Doom3, World of Padman, Quake3, etc, etc ), everything build from ports. The only "gotcha" are KDE's "System Notificactions" (start up, shutdown, etc ..). They are not exactly choppy .. they seem to eat miliseconds of sound ... sound doesn t cut .. it remains a stream .. is just that some miliseconds dissapear. Is there a workaround for that? I already tried: /etc/syscontl.conf kern.ipc.shmmax=100000000 kern.ipc.shmall=65536 but to no avail .. System Notificactions are still choppy ... maybe it's ony me ... Anyone getting the same on your systems? pciconf -vl pcm0@pci0:4:2:0: class=0x040100 card=0x80401102 chip=0x00021102 rev=0x08 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Creative Technology LTD.' device = 't4780010004541 Sound Blaster Live! (Also Live! 5.1) - OEM from DELL - CT4780' class = multimedia subclass = audio (just in case .. the card is _not_ an OEM from DELL ... it was originally buyed Boxed, brand new, and the exact model was Sound Blaster Live! X-Gamer Edition, and it is 4.1). Any help will be greatly appreciated Thanks :) -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 08:20:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA110656CB for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA6D8FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so431280ywe.13 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:20:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=EniTjF+oj6+RN8Gvx322GGLGZ1Yfvu8bNpEdrCYTnr0=; b=A5TKAOZbZsJCE1/l40jPOdpB0jxmMAA2OtoLcTo8I3SOvtPH8zi9CSqqdsC0qOUsGH Z28A5irlfisVcAruu2wIr172c+NhngSYVSavRejJaQXyhKl+/6+wrikus1KM3zg5njDy 7Vyb/AThOntsz52Me2oS+sJbtBFGEYdABZr7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=TA4ua5NRQE+eiC4i+5wel+d6KzAn8ouuCJFTtKglfryngvDj1DgcC2AEhl27J2hsrr 3sg5UD6PPmM51JU8FIklmcffF39UFQ587cc90Rq4ETGlK6j5cNzj10+8tKXZ0ent3zgp o7KsvZke+Qiod5itRgFc+RibXOh8Wr3U2uW1Q= Received: by 10.151.111.15 with SMTP id o15mr2793067ybm.7.1217578811503; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-117-245-190.fibertel.com.ar ( [190.245.117.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm1357241ywn.0.2008.08.01.01.20.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:20:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:20:05 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <18578.31748.337951.8423@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18578.31748.337951.8423@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808010520.05910.gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:20:12 -0000 On Thursday 31 July 2008 23:59:16 Robert Huff wrote: > David Christensen writes: > > I would like to add a PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card > > (NIC) to the computer and was wondering what cards other people > > are using and how they liked them. Any comments and/or > > recommendations would be appreciated. > > Realtek-based cards were mentioned; they seem to do well under > light to moderate loads, but not so well when the going gets tough. > Intel-based cards, on the other hand, have a superior track > record; probably doesn't hurt the driver is maintained by Intel. I > replaced an re() card with a Pro/1000 dual port, and watched errors > drop from ~1% to _0_ in 11 days of moderate to heavy usage. Robert, sorry to bother, but is this one ok? http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/adapters/pro1000gt/pro1000gt-overview.htm I can get it in here for us$20 each. http://articulo.mercadolibre.com.ar/MLA-38975340-placa-de-red-intel-101001000-pro1000-gt-desktop-adapter-_JM If you give me a tumb up, I'll be buying a few tomorrow :) Thanks -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 08:45:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6131065674 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5B38FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from rmc67-31.zih.tu-dresden.de ([141.30.67.31] helo=server-n) by mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOqGd-0003UZ-2g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:45:47 +0200 Received: from martin (p5B0EF59F.dip.t-dialin.net [91.14.245.159]) by server-n (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951D1100A091 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:45:42 +0200 (CEST) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: "Martin Laabs" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20080731210011.GB56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20080731210011.GB56756@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:45:41 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Linux) X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de Subject: Re: Compile firefox with debug symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:45:49 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:00:53PM +0200, Martin Laabs wrote: >> I have some problems with firefox (it just don't >> start > Try starting firefox from a terminal. It will print a message if it > cannot find a library. My previous message is misleading in this point. There are all libraries firefox needs. But I think there is a bug somwhere in some library since firefox (and regxpcom which is also belongs to firefox) just do not start. (With no error or debug message) GDB says, that it hangs in _umtx_op() which has something to do with the pthreads. Here is a part of the backtrace: #0 0x28362329 in _umtx_op () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x29201381 in pthread_cleanup_push () from /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libstoragecomps.so #2 0x291fd848 in pthread_mutex_getprioceiling () from /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libstoragecomps.so #3 0x283f24b4 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/libc.so.7 #4 0x2809c2f2 in PR_Lock () from /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 #5 0x2809c472 in PR_EnterMonitor () from /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 #6 0x280ac265 in PR_FindSymbol () from /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 #7 0x2849ba92 in nsServiceManager::UnregisterService () from /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom_core.so [...] However - since there are no debugging symbols in the binary itself I can't trace it back to a specific function, library or bug. Thank you, Martin L. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 09:27:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEC81065673 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475F28FC24 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KOquq-00054u-5t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:16 +0000 Received: from bkkb-gw.voop.net ([62.97.242.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:16 +0000 Received: from solskogen by bkkb-gw.voop.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:16 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:27:08 +0200 Lines: 7 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bkkb-gw.voop.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) Sender: news Subject: Changing sshd to start earlier X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:17 -0000 Oh hai! Is it possible to change the order when rc scripts are staring? I would like sshd (from base) to be started before anything else. -- chs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 09:47:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5711065676 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7348FC1D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m719lUK9001749; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:47:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m719lU2g001746; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:47:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:47:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Christer Solskogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080801114657.P1739@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing sshd to start earlier X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:47:50 -0000 > Is it possible to change the order when rc scripts are staring? > I would like sshd (from base) to be started before anything else. add # REQUIRE: sshd in scripts that has to start after sshd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 10:32:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBFD1065677 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7105C8FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 118AC1420CE; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:32:15 +0300 (EEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from iris.teledomenet.local (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88981420BF; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:31:42 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: "Alexandre Biancalana" Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:33:21 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <8e10486b0807292151wa67d464kfd906da08a2f8053@mail.gmail.com> <200807301806.04141.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <8e10486b0807312054i7b3ca5f1x19f4899ef5a638c3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e10486b0807312054i7b3ca5f1x19f4899ef5a638c3@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808011333.21884.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: carp+openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:32:16 -0000 On Friday 01 August 2008 06:54:02 Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > The firewalls failover this is working great with Carp. My > difficulties is to configure OpenOSPFD to distribute routes in this > setup, Two points: 1) Did you try to run OSPF on the CARP interface? Or the physical one? I don't think running OSPF on the CARP interface will work, cause the CARP interface receives nothing while at BACKUP mode. 2) Specify the router-id yourself to avoid OpenOSPFD's autoselection, remember that the CARP interface has the same IP address on both hosts and that's not very nice to OSPF:) > the links failover+loadbalance comes naturally after ospf > running. No, OSPF cannot provide load balancing, as FreeBSD does not support equal cost multipath routing, that is you can use one and only one next hop for a destination. So, in short, OSPF will not do load balancing, as it does with other vendors you may be familiar with. If you run CARP on the LAN links as well(which you probably do), you should test and see how CARP's ARP level load balancing fits your network... Hope this helps a bit, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 10:51:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60EA106567A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2038FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so700009mue.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:51:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=pAmJjHXIEplFp093VtZUbthB87CHBZuPA7qL5wxcBJc=; b=O+RL6mLat56xMBONsQB4kEPI/EnAKMi04hXMihlK2/GZkq4jiP2AlSy72K2IvwUK0+ UHqkl1bqskXz1X8NITqOmH4GUxy7B5+xUMIU97VWVbsxB6DqopteBhFtOR4rCbNbDiOK xXdjF22vW2CYrlOgY+aNharJzWstHfNC1VLS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qo7AAQScn0QxjLiggtjfIKlsbXBCo46uQSXDlEPQCS4+Qhrk7Alq7ZNqmTWzrM9SOK 8TAcEb2/vnjFnJlt76xNJN/7m22FkJRcnINOpNd06UKEa30Cn/FPa2b6ZznpB5UXCSjm PB/9h9tFBkfO9M4jX+aQqxQ2X3o3Z0SMq+OSA= Received: by 10.103.131.18 with SMTP id i18mr4306012mun.116.1217586296084; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:24:56 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Jails and multiple IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:51:50 -0000 Big ups to Bjoern A. Zeeb for his multiple IP patch as well as his friendly support service ;) I'd just like to confirm, however, if this is how it's done? # cd /usr/src # wget http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080727-11-at146062.diff # patch -p6 < bz_jail7-20080727-11-at146062.diff # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC # make installworld # make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC # mergemaster -U Now to the jail part (this is exactly how I created the jail in the first place) # export D=/usr/jail/camel # mkdir -p $D # make world DESTDIR=$D # cd etc/ # make distribution DESTDIR=$D # mount -t devfs devfs $D/dev Also, under jail_X_ip in rc.conf, must I enter the IPs one by one or can I specify an entire range? Thank you all! Redd Vinylene http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 13:27:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972311065683 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.poughkeepsieschools.org (mail.poughkeepsieschools.org [64.72.66.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1FB8FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from [10.20.0.10] (port=52665 helo=mbookpro.tcentral.lan) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1KOuf3-0003YI-6u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:13 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.93.1/7910 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:13 -0400 Message-Id: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> From: B. Cook To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:27:12 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:27:14 -0000 Hello All, Seems OT, but I have been asked to give someone remote access to an AS/ 400 we have here. As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. They give everyone access 'locally' via telnet and some IBM gui app at the moment; the software: eNetwork Personal Communications AS/400 Client Access Express for Windows Workstation Program Version 4.3 If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400, I could give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use 'something' to connect to it. Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? I don't know how the AS works or what people use on it or use it for.. so please excuse the seemingly ignorant questions.. Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 13:31:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABF9106568B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5E28FC30 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so858516wfg.7 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jsgBFQKn38g3Sfp0ombB8PFy/XvCV4MXs+MXIiljcx4=; b=UFF0EZ9Oj0Rj6bTMBuCDnbxcUsLDthTK+X/PpGs+19w6HJoXzra14KPoZxH8wL+4al UIRcgPk1DlsaZp+EJdUJCoZ7wzg6Jhc67TM4U2z6wsGYvblohDO+OToVnJ/27vTwMzF5 lJU43K+phntBbF8Fd1AnIAzyOs+QTtBAyRljI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lK9dWuRY7Wd0aj/Wxqpr/nG2aVadMSWhdg7KDRviAOf6kODL2FL0a6cD50ZDC8cVKi CTIJhaW9EkTSwKZwpMNIm2Srz9ADg2Jm2XR/ICrDEhYajs2B7xtpmLmoISUGx7P586Q/ PbMvg2iR1eQccDACYHODiYujrk1vbo436m2R8= Received: by 10.142.223.4 with SMTP id v4mr3753941wfg.48.1217597487316; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.19 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660808010631x44ec934cnc04dd8ab17d49519@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:31:27 -0600 From: Modulok To: "Matthew Seaman" In-Reply-To: <48903C4C.2090902@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64c038660807300154ue4e5a0cyb792b46fd3ec6037@mail.gmail.com> <48903C4C.2090902@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dumping mounted file systems with insufficient space... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:31:28 -0000 >> I can use dump(8) an active, mounted file systems via the -L flag. >> According to the manual, this first creates a snapshot of the file >> system, to the .snap directory of the file systems root. What if the >> file system to be dumped, does not have sufficient free-space to store >> a snapshot? Can I still safely dump(8) a mounted file system? > > A snapshot doesn't take any significant /extra/ space itself. Rather it > consists of marking the state of the system at that time and provides a > view (via the .snap directory) of that state of the filesystem. Of course, > subsequent modifications of the filesystem can cause more space than > otherwise expected to be used up -- as both the snapshot and the latest > versions of anything have to be kept around -- but how much impact this has > depends entirely on the IO traffic characteristics of your particular > filesystem and cannot be predicted in any useful fashion without a great > deal more information. > > If snapshots won't work for you, another trick (if you can swing it) is to > have the data on a RAID1 mirror. Then you can detach one of the mirrors, > back it up and then reattach the mirror. Doing this with gmirror is a > simple matter of writing about a 10 line shell script. Other mirroring > hard/soft-ware may be less cooperative. However you do it, this will > involve an extended period while mirrors resynchronise after the backup > where your file system won't have the desired level of resilience. > > If you can't use snapshots, can't split the mirror and you can't unmount > the filesystem, then the next best thing is to make the filesystem as > quiescent as possible. Basically, shut down any processes using the > filesystem. That's probably as unacceptable as any of the other > alternatives -- in which case, you can still go ahead and dump the > filesystem, but don't expect the generated dump to be 100% consistent. > It will be 'good enough' for some purposes, but files actively involved > in IO at the time the dump is made are likely to be corrupted. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW Thank you for the clarification about snapshots, Matthew. I went with a dump to another disk and it worked out without any problems :) -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 13:46:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E39D106568E for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-140.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-140.bluehost.com [67.222.39.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97EDF8FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 28627 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2008 13:46:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 13:46:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=O/DJV5GftPAaMDzpBd1UKXI8nSDEzEA8rgx9rIEr6fYUCfzeSaFR7TjJmJhPFqenHk3BXwTRjDUsh7/9NwVyF5Fomlf49aIWqUiZSglxS2FP8XS68A7JXO1YU9lSaKvb; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOuxg-0000cI-Jz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:46:29 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:40:25 -0600 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:40:25 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801134025.GB11304@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <539c60b90807311132x326d8323h873428425368da51@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539c60b90807311132x326d8323h873428425368da51@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: rc.suspend/rc.resume was: resume (hate to even ask) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:46:34 -0000 --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > I just realized no one probably replied to my email due to the gross > ambiguity of the english language. No, I am not looking for a job. > See below ;) I have to admit I thought you were talking about your curriculum vitae and so on when I first saw the original subject, and not about ACPI problems. Thanks for clarifying. >=20 > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Steve Franks wrot= e: > > Ok, > > > > I have too many systems with varying degrees of working freebsd on > > them, and I can't seem to leave well enough alone. I hear lots of > > people having sucess with suspend, and I can't get it to work on a > > single system. > > > > My current strongest desire is to get it running on my hp ze4500 > > laptop. I've played with the stuff in the handbook, but that just > > took me from having a blank screen and no responses from Ctl-Alt-F(x) > > to now the fan comes on for a moment on resume, then the system powers > > off....doesn't seem to matter if X is up or not. > > > > I've kldunloaded usb, radeon, sound, drm, what else should I try? > > Also, rc.resume has a typo, right? I'm susposed to change the > > #kldunload usb section to add kldload usb (and friends) right? I hope someone offers some more insight -- I've been having some issues with suspend/resume as well. Unfortunately, I don't really have any help to offer. I guess I'm just commiserating. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] They always say that when life gives you lemons you should make lemonade.= =20 I always wonder -- isn't the lemonade going to suck if life doesn't give you any sugar? --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiTEkkACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVPdgCg6mWKfnp80iytFWzNzlNrZpJ7 ilAAn1BCt4PS/cWCd0yGSVlmp07csSrS =MJle -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 13:53:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4471065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0568FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00FAKD8IECM3@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:53:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:53:06 -0400 From: David Gurvich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801095306.083027b4@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Timeout on wireless ipw0 using wpa and dhcp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:53:18 -0000 Hello, I have been having an issue with maintaining a connection that seems to hang at random intervals. The only messages I see are about the interface 'ipw0: link state changed to DOWN' then UP a few times until the connection is reestablished or I have to '/etc/rc.d/netif restart ipw0'. If left on it's own reestablishing the connection takes under 60 seconds, using netif is about 5 seconds including typing the command. I suspect an issue with either dhcp, wpa_supplicant, or the ipw wireless driver. I was not able to get the ipw driver to work at all in FreeBSD-6.3 and suspect the driver. Is there anyway to pin down the problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:08:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8751065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E322A8FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00MDUDY3OI60@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:08:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:08:27 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <20080801134025.GB11304@kokopelli.hydra> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801100827.118377a8@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <539c60b90807311132x326d8323h873428425368da51@mail.gmail.com> <20080801134025.GB11304@kokopelli.hydra> Subject: Re: rc.suspend/rc.resume was: resume (hate to even ask) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:08:53 -0000 Can you verify that acpi is loaded and working, 'sysctl -a |grep acpi' ? Suspend/Resume will not work properly with apm and requires acpi. You might also try disabling the loading of any extra modules, particularly sound, on boot in /boot/loader.conf and see if any of that helps. I needed to load acpi_ibm, add a tweak for the mouse in /boot/loader.conf and stop a wireless interface in rc.suspend before resume started working properly on my thinkpad T23. Only loading acpi_ibm seemed intuitive to me, I still don't know what 'hint.psm.0.flags="0x3000"' does, and I suspect issues with the ipw driver in FreeBSD but can't find any information on that. Hope something there helps, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:16:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDA5106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126778FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4X0003BEADZF54@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:15:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:15:49 -0400 From: David Gurvich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:16:01 -0000 How does one find the options that a particular package was built with, without installing the package? I don't see any such options in pkg_info and wondered if there were some other tool. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:16:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A146F10656D1 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EE4F8FC2C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 41072 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Aug 2008 13:49:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Ehoo/zAMgH9PPMqSYWcVhZH/daIotb4W/xM3uPb1sUesga+NbdJttuviinnrmGskDkblz040B57eNWL1YbcU9jln/UMDfiJAqWHO1xVqUtLDhdNUL7hNV3qsvUgrJxCf6eDgfg+jqI22J57LKsIJFdL+MSsbkdAn58IPzl3jbJk=; X-YMail-OSG: 6kMckrcVM1m15H9NscjClY2Qi2uQb9CyQzUUl0XmukBW82EElQQH_UEFui4Ydpmz0Bvdg94U6jM0jt9beFKYjWKG81X.WjKGCa8XKFnZY3zWqkPE1_bx2SLtsvokWedKhd7wsAj9H6I_CeiQyuq1RVsM Received: from [75.41.234.82] by web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:49:45 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Busby To: "B. Cook" In-Reply-To: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <914532.40874.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: help help Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:16:26 -0000 "B. Cook" wrote: Hello All, Seems OT, but I have been asked to give someone remote access to an AS/ 400 we have here. As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. They give everyone access 'locally' via telnet and some IBM gui app at the moment; the software: eNetwork Personal Communications AS/400 Client Access Express for Windows Workstation Program Version 4.3 If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400, I could give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use 'something' to connect to it. Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? I don't know how the AS works or what people use on it or use it for.. so please excuse the seemingly ignorant questions.. Thanks in advance _______________________________________________ Look at http://tn5250.sourceforge.net/, as far as security your going to be disappointed. If your on the same subnet as the as400, a simple telnet session will allow you in the machine with a user name and pass. IBM dropped the ball with this systems security, as you prob know. For years they have toyed with the idea of killing the OS, but keep it alive at the last second. I work with it, but I don't like IBM's idea of security. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:25:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583CB106566C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A0D8FC2D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 4182 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2008 14:25:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp2.knology.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 14:25:16 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id CD3F528429; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:25:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:25:15 -0500 From: David Kelly To: David Gurvich Message-ID: <20080801142515.GA19107@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:25:18 -0000 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:15:49AM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > How does one find the options that a particular package was built with, > without installing the package? I don't see any such options in > pkg_info and wondered if there were some other tool. You could go to the port in /usr/ports/ and "make patch" which will do everything right up to building the port. Then browse the sources to see what has been selected. Sometimes its easier to see the options selected by watching the port compile. A simple "make" will compile the port but not install it. A potential problem is that if a build dependency is missing it will try to build and install that first. A build dependency is something needed to build the port but not needed to run the port. Precompiled ports bypass the need for build dependencies. Or you could just study the Makefile and supporting files in /usr/ports/ to see what the defaults are for your particular precompiled port. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:30:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE88106567E for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28B78FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71EUShh060918; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:30:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2rfp2LL6lOPt; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:30:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (dsl.daleco.biz [209.125.108.70]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71EULrD060911; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:30:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <48931DF8.8010006@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:30:16 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080719 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Busby References: <914532.40874.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <914532.40874.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "B. Cook" , help help Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:30:31 -0000 Mark Busby wrote: > > "B. Cook" wrote: Hello All, > > Seems OT, but I have been asked to give someone remote access to an AS/ > 400 we have here. It is OT. > As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an > openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. They give everyone > access 'locally' via telnet and some IBM gui app at the moment; the > software: > > eNetwork Personal Communications AS/400 > Client Access Express for Windows > Workstation Program > Version 4.3 > > If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400, I could > give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use > 'something' to connect to it. > > Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? > > I don't know how the AS works or what people use on it or use it for.. > so please excuse the seemingly ignorant questions.. > > Thanks in advance > _______________________________________________ > > > Look at http://tn5250.sourceforge.net/, as far as security your going to be disappointed. > > If your on the same subnet as the as400, a simple telnet session will allow you in the machine with a user name and pass. IBM dropped the ball with this systems security, as you prob know. For years they have toyed with the idea of killing the OS, but keep it alive at the last second. I work with it, but I don't like IBM's idea of security. According to this: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/network/pcomm/features/ IBM's "Personal Communications" (which you list) supports secure connections via SSL/TLS. HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- The price of success in philosophy is triviality. -- C. Glymour From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:32:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46588106568B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9955D8FC2A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 79007 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2008 14:06:05 -0000 Received: from www.matrix.net (HELO localhost) (192.168.123.10) by mail2.matrix.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 14:06:05 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:06:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> In-Reply-To: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> X-Face: 9K^F42eGrHAbAe?%/Jn(.sAeg9d{Ur6`x<[+LZ46Plx#sTFr]9_>|#(?~v6X,=?utf-8?q?2=7EBeL=23=3A7kxV8=23s=3BUP=0A=09=7C?=>X.=B,VvQ"}!^Zb}AGD:Um.+; P=%U6W Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? (OT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:32:48 -0000 On Friday 01 August 2008, B. Cook wrote: > Hello All, > > Seems OT, but I have been asked to give someone remote access to an AS/ > 400 we have here. > > As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an > openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. They give everyone > access 'locally' via telnet and some IBM gui app at the moment; the > software: > > eNetwork Personal Communications AS/400 > Client Access Express for Windows > Workstation Program > Version 4.3 > > If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400, I could > give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use > 'something' to connect to it. > > Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? > > I don't know how the AS works or what people use on it or use it for.. > so please excuse the seemingly ignorant questions.. > > Thanks in advance > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It's possible to set up a sshd on an AS/400 (aka "iSeries" aka "system i"). AFAIK you need to run OS Version V5R3M or higher on AS/400 and install the "PASE tools" lic-program. For more information see the links below: http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/enable/site/porting/tools/openssh.html http://wiki.midrange.com/index.php/SSH Depending on the version of the Client Access Emulator, it's allso possible to setup TN5250 via SSL, but you need to configure SSL on the AS/400 to make this happen. There are at least two 5250 terminal emulatiors in the ports tree. (/usr/ports/net/tn5250 and tn5250j). Cheers ch -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x1A9BE943 OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:34:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD6E1065688 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA568FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00AO1F3RJIO3@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:33:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:33:27 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <20080801142515.GA19107@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <20080801103327.68e4db05@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> <20080801142515.GA19107@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:34:45 -0000 I don't want to know what options are set for building a port. I want to know what options were used in a previously built port that is either available as a tar file or installed on a system, preferably checking the tar file for the options. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:38:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EC2106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (SNOWBALL.pcbi.upenn.edu [128.91.62.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734CE8FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmutu@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu) Received: from snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m71EcoPb004270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:38:50 -0400 Received: (from vmutu@localhost) by snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m71EcoA2004268; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:38:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:38:50 -0400 From: Valeriu Mutu To: David Gurvich Message-ID: <20080801143850.GB31923@snowball.pcbi.upenn.edu> References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> <20080801142515.GA19107@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20080801103327.68e4db05@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080801103327.68e4db05@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux Organization: Penn Center for Bioinformatics Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:38:51 -0000 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > I don't want to know what options are set for building a port. > I want to know what options were used in a previously built port that > is either available as a tar file or installed on a system, preferably > checking the tar file for the options. You might find some hints by downloading/unpacking the package and using 'ldd' on the binary to see what shared libraries it is linked to. Valeriu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Valeriu Mutu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:42:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4C106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from fhw-relay07.plus.net (fhw-relay07.plus.net [212.159.14.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2358FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by fhw-relay07.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1KOvqJ-0008VJ-G8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:42:55 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOvqI-000HCn-Qm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:42:55 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:42:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808011542.54713.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: 938545bc5f16331b392e3950d5556ed8 Subject: Some ports ignored by portversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:42:58 -0000 With pkg_version I get the following: curlew:/root# pkg_version -vL= diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_10 < needs updating (port has 1.5.0.07.01_11) en-openoffice.org-GB-2.3.1 < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) firefox-2.0.0.14_1,1 < needs updating (port has 2.0.0.16,1) gnutls-2.4.1 < needs updating (port has 2.4.1_1) jdk-1.6.0.3p4 < needs updating (port has 1.6.0.3p4_3) k3b-1.0.4_2 < needs updating (port has 1.0.4_3) kdebase-3.5.8_2 < needs updating (port has 3.5.8_3) kdebase-kompmgr-3.5.8_1 < needs updating (port has 3.5.8_2) linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.16 < needs updating (port has 1.4.2.18) ocaml-lablgl-1.02_1 < needs updating (port has 1.03) ocaml-lablgtk2-2.6.0_4 < needs updating (port has 2.10.1_1) p5-Error-0.17014 < needs updating (port has 0.17015) phpMyAdmin-2.11.5.2 < needs updating (port has 2.11.8.r1) speex-1.2.r1,1 < needs updating (port has 1.2.r1_1,1) unison-2.13.16_1 < needs updating (port has 2.27.57_1) wine-1.1.0,1 < needs updating (port has 1.1.2,1) ... which is what I would expect but portversion gives: curlew:/root# portversion -vL= gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1_1) k3b < needs updating (port has 1.0.4_3) kdebase < needs updating (port has 3.5.8_3) kdebase-kompmgr < needs updating (port has 3.5.8_2) p5-Error < needs updating (port has 0.17015) speex < needs updating (port has 1.2.r1_1,1) The "missing" ports (*jdk*, openoffice.org, firefox-2, ocaml*, phpMyAdmin, unison and wine) are all marked as held in pkgtools.conf. Until today they would be shown by portversion as being in need of updating but held. I think portversion also used to show the version number of the currently installed port. The "missing" ports don't even show up in a full listing with portbersion -v. This change in behaviour might be a result of to me experimenting with portmaster as a possible replacement for portupgrade. In order to ensure that the held ports wouldn't get upgraded by portmaster I created +IGNOREME files in their /var/db/pkg directories. I imagine the ports database must have been affected as a result of this but I've tried deleting the +IGNOREME files, and even removing the holds from pkgtools.conf but that made no difference to portversion. I've tried pkgdb with -F and -u options but still no joy. It looks like it's not just portversion that's affected, pkgdb can't find the "missing" ports either: curlew:/root# pkgdb -o gnutls-2.4.1 security/gnutls security/gnutls curlew:/root# pkgdb -o unison-2.13.16_1 ? ? curlew:/root# How do I repair my ports? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 14:52:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA09106566C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568848FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 27939 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2008 14:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp5.knology.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 14:51:54 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id F3AA828429; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:51:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:51:49 -0500 From: David Kelly To: David Gurvich Message-ID: <20080801145149.GA19285@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> <20080801142515.GA19107@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20080801103327.68e4db05@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080801103327.68e4db05@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:52:13 -0000 On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, David Gurvich wrote: > I don't want to know what options are set for building a port. > I want to know what options were used in a previously built port that > is either available as a tar file or installed on a system, preferably > checking the tar file for the options. If you got the precomipled port from official sources then that which is in /usr/ports *is* how it was optioned, with the possible exception of the X stuff. If someone else precompiled the port, then ask them. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:03:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4317F1065674 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B4D8FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.250.23]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71F5IVT082043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71F3vcj041295; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:03:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <489325CD.7030402@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:03:41 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "B. Cook" References: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> In-Reply-To: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:03:53 -0000 B. Cook ha scritto: > As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an > openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. AS/400 supports telnet over SSL, though I never found it to be in use. > If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400 Normally it all boils down to: they could, but will not bother to (they probably never used it and don't have experience with it, anyway). > I could > give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use > 'something' to connect to it. I would not do so, since you would need local users on the FreeBSD box, which I usually try and avoid. > Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? If you really want to go this way, tn5250 is in ports. VPNs (with whatever technology) might be a better solution. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:15:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BBD106568C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EB78FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00BLIGMIUU90@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:06:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:06:18 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <20080731195327.6d49e9a8@verizon.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801110618.2c17c7db@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20080731195327.6d49e9a8@verizon.net> Subject: Re: Static ip wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:15:49 -0000 I think I have the beginnings of an idea. Do not set WPA in rc.conf, only DHCP, and use 'script "script_name";' in /etc/dhclient.conf. Then have that script do the configuration. Has anyone used dhclient.conf with a custom script? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:17:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D71106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17208FC26 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 68-189-244-97.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.244.97] helo=Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KOwNu-0007Bu-DO; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:17:40 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by Gregory-Larkins-Computer.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0246722C8A0C; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:17:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <48932909.7040305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:17:29 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gurvich References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:17:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Gurvich wrote: | How does one find the options that a particular package was built with, | without installing the package? I don't see any such options in | pkg_info and wondered if there were some other tool. | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | Hi David, ~From what I can tell here, that information is not recorded in the package file. For instance, I build a lot of packages with custom options in what I call a "template jail". Then I build other jails and run pkg_add for all of the packages that I want to install in them. In the template jail, there's a /var/db/ports/ directory with subdirectories for each port that uses the OPTIONS variable. My /var/db/ports/wget/options file looks like this: # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # No user-servicable parts inside! # Options for wget-1.11.2_1 _OPTIONS_READ=wget-1.11.2_1 WITHOUT_GNUTLS=true WITHOUT_IPV6=true WITHOUT_NLS=true WITH_OPENSSL=true I just logged into another jail and extracted the wget .tgz file into a temp directory and ran some text searches like so: jail16# zcat /packages/wget-1.11.2_1.tgz | tar xvfB - x +CONTENTS x +COMMENT x +DESC x +MTREE_DIRS x man/man1/wget.1.gz x bin/wget x etc/wgetrc.sample x info/wget.info jail16# find . -type f -exec grep -H WITH_ {} \; jail16# find . -type f -exec grep -H WITHOUT_ {} \; As you can see, nothing matched in the extracted package files. I wonder how easy it would be to add an enhancement to pkg_create to store the /var/db/ports//options file to the package as "+OPTIONS"? That would be very helpful to what I'm doing, and I'd also like to see better support for maintaining those options when upgrading ports from source. Can anyone comment on the pkg_add enhancement and what side-effects that might have? Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.sourcehosting.net/ http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIkykJ0sRouByUApARAiWtAJ9Kp20t1MLxIudmsUdCYiMy41s8FgCaAs4X iqXRJAj58IFxMY3/QO0MJaI= =awIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:23:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0D71065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost05.isp.att.net (fmailhost05.isp.att.net [207.115.11.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F648FC23 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-19-255-192.bna.bellsouth.net[68.19.255.192]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc05) with ESMTP id <20080801152357H0500eb9b3e>; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:23:58 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.19.255.192] Message-ID: <48932A83.7000909@datapipe.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:23:47 -0500 From: Paul Procacci User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gurvich References: <20080731195327.6d49e9a8@verizon.net> <20080801110618.2c17c7db@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20080801110618.2c17c7db@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Static ip wpa_supplicant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:23:58 -0000 David Gurvich wrote: > I think I have the beginnings of an idea. Do not set WPA in rc.conf, > only DHCP, and use 'script "script_name";' in /etc/dhclient.conf. Then > have that script do the configuration. Has anyone used dhclient.conf > with a custom script? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Why don't you assign the ip address via DHCP using the mac address of the card? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:31:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2371B106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83038FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so572195nfh.33 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=sPFCsBeioWxbj3vpzjql40jKahnW9T/AnKIITHWbG+U=; b=d9Zw14gU4jcQH06tC7v3HiBAUBlRM1Duvngx0JiASF3TyJU9uhPYlNQbnk3+ICqjSi ejHFgbYWAM//N3j1yf67JO+nSkv1KVxMQueS2gwqMwudb1aeQUiqQfL86wqjWMaZqTRO 7PtzELlMMOJlXCtYTXLkfTZxcyr2aNSKLzYJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jKiuOtAvTpY+UqlH7eBeh22uy5YNTqzEAw7E+pedq18JkDcUf0AYxw2C/AU9/7Rron QHDto6Au+qd/RGPuVubRcF0XSG6fP+bXWja+BG15mubQgvoxVX1zOwY/DTnESb1zDZHi cZQ8GOdAdO1Dr5hFSVy7l5O/7ILfVFxtB0Y+M= Received: by 10.103.214.8 with SMTP id r8mr4401364muq.64.1217604682289; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:31:22 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org, bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:31:24 -0000 Hello! Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious server, not a kindergarten ;) I don't want the games group there, I just don't need it! Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:37:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7996E1065670 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF828FC24 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.250.23]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71FcjHh084609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:38:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71FbPUk048274; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:37:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <48932DA4.4000707@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:37:08 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "B. Cook" References: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> <489325CD.7030402@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <489325CD.7030402@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:37:19 -0000 Andrea Venturoli ha scritto: > B. Cook ha scritto: > >> As I am not knowledgeable about AS/400's I do not know if there is an >> openssh/sshd app that could be put on there. > > AS/400 supports telnet over SSL, though I never found it to be in use. > > > >> If they can not find some form of sshd to put on the AS/400 > > Normally it all boils down to: they could, but will not bother to (they > probably never used it and don't have experience with it, anyway). > > > >> I could give people access to a FreeBSD via ssh and then have them use >> 'something' to connect to it. > > I would not do so, since you would need local users on the FreeBSD box, > which I usually try and avoid. > > > > > Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? > > If you really want to go this way, tn5250 is in ports. > > > > > VPNs (with whatever technology) might be a better solution. I forgot: altough I never tried this, you may want to experiment with stunnel to allow for telnet/SSL on the client side, without the need to enable it on the server side. Disadvantage is, you lose the ability to discriminate which user can connect from the outside and which cannot. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:08:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7061065693 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from WilsonCPU@aol.com) Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com (imo-m24.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190788FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from WilsonCPU@aol.com) Received: from WilsonCPU@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.4.) id n.bcb.3058ee56 (34916) for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.145]) by cia-da03.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA031-88644893247c220; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:58:04 -0400 Received: from MBLK-M10 (mblk-m10.mblk.aol.com [64.12.136.43]) by smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDA023-5bb44893247012e; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:57:52 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:57:52 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 63.239.69.1 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Wilson X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38159-STANDARD Received: from 63.239.69.1 by MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com (64.12.136.43) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:57:52 -0400 Message-Id: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:48:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question re IPs-to-CIDR conversion program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:08:12 -0000 I'm trying to write a program that will take 2 IPs and return an appropriate CIDR which contains both. I found this file: ips-to-cidr-nets.pl listed under ~eivind on FreeBSD, which sounds like it might be a good model. Unfortunately, I can't download the file (get "Forbidden") page, nor locate user "eivind" on the FreeBSD Homepages page to ask him/her about it. (It's dated 2001, in case that helps; apparently eivind is long gone...) 1. Can anyone get me a copy of this program? Or... 2. Put me in touch with its author so I can ask about it?? Or... 3. Point me to another program which does what I need? Thanks. I'm very new to all this; I was able to cobble together a CIDR-to-IPs calculator in JavaScript, but going this other direction seems much harder, and far more confusing. ------------------------------------------------------- Mark Wilson, CPUWORKS.COM wilsoncpu@aol.com ------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:51:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C2B1065689 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531278FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q2so548451uge.37 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ir6FicGFuMipMYXVnRzxzh6zJJcctAj30PEiy7A4Abo=; b=vq3r9qeMuqpHIK5+IHqPmm5Uqh6Zq/ALALoRDU+JPTgvcsZBopdPiYNUb6jj0vEirz 9p6VaOvszcMko2/DVXUxlfykmJUN6IOjfqqj9P0lFpxgN2vJkkbtE12g8fug/J+75e++ i/kUZvmRdXb4v4n42G9LQ9itkLPYOlLP9qF1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ZkGKZEjTRPBez5PHH5py0ZWFyUKyelraE+PRVgFHttXYZhsrG7IvsqGdlBpCqDNB+L W43qvQ6NrhYA14cIXQ5S/Rag+HxCw6DsFoowOPsWv+Hz16eziv3XSKeHKn+a3QznSZOU mxCUgP0KP8nPBW4lAkI80JC2ff9vrK2PrSNCE= Received: by 10.103.245.18 with SMTP id x18mr4418192mur.20.1217605891731; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:51:31 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: asenchi@asenchi.com, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8d9c091a0808010835o37add3e5s62123bb46c1cb1bb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d9c091a0808010835o37add3e5s62123bb46c1cb1bb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:51:33 -0000 That is so cool! Thanks! On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Curt Micol wrote: > man src.conf(5) > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious >> server, not a kindergarten ;) >> >> I don't want the games group there, I just don't need it! >> >> Thanks! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > # Curt Micol > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:53:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827A61065677 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E8FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-118-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.118.98]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD5A16C018E for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:53:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m71FrAtk001664 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:53:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:53:10 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <20080801175310.efc76a0e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:53:13 -0000 Hi! On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:31:22 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious > server, not a kindergarten ;) > > I don't want the games group there, I just don't need it! Alltough the system's games group does not require much disk space, there's a way not to build them: Create /etc/src.conf or midify it with the following statement: WITHOUT_GAMES Refer to "man src.conf" for further things not to build. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:57:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B67106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [207.115.11.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DECA8FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-19-255-192.bna.bellsouth.net[68.19.255.192]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with ESMTP id <20080801155713H0100m5udie>; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.19.255.192] Message-ID: <4893324F.9070406@datapipe.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:57:03 -0500 From: Paul Procacci User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wilson References: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question re IPs-to-CIDR conversion program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:57:14 -0000 Mark Wilson wrote: > I'm trying to write a program that will take 2 IPs and return an appropriate CIDR which contains both. > I found this file: ips-to-cidr-nets.pl listed under ~eivind on FreeBSD, which sounds like it might be a good model. > Unfortunately, I can't download the file (get "Forbidden") page, nor locate user "eivind" on the FreeBSD Homepages page to ask him/her about it. > (It's dated 2001, in case that helps; apparently eivind is long gone...) > > 1. Can anyone get me a copy of this program? Or... > 2. Put me in touch with its author so I can ask about it?? Or... > 3. Point me to another program which does what I need? > > Thanks. I'm very new to all this; I was able to cobble together a CIDR-to-IPs calculator in JavaScript, but going this other direction seems much harder, and far more confusing. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Mark Wilson, CPUWORKS.COM > wilsoncpu@aol.com > ------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You may want to look at ipcalc (/usr/ports/net-mgmt/ipcalc) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:58:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE62A1065676 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838E38FC26 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 36DB73E2C20; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347FE3E2C1F; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill X-X-Sender: duane@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Mark Wilson In-Reply-To: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> Message-ID: References: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question re IPs-to-CIDR conversion program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d.hill@yournetplus.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:58:20 -0000 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mark Wilson wrote: > > I'm trying to write a program that will take 2 IPs and return an appropriate CIDR which contains both. > I found this file: ips-to-cidr-nets.pl listed under ~eivind on FreeBSD, which sounds like it might be a good model. > Unfortunately, I can't download the file (get "Forbidden") page, nor locate user "eivind" on the FreeBSD Homepages page to ask him/her about it. > (It's dated 2001, in case that helps; apparently eivind is long gone...) > > 1. Can anyone get me a copy of this program? Or... > 2. Put me in touch with its author so I can ask about it?? Or... > 3. Point me to another program which does what I need? > > Thanks. I'm very new to all this; I was able to cobble together a CIDR-to-IPs calculator in JavaScript, but going this other direction seems much harder, and far more confusing. If you know anything about Perl, you can use the port: /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-CIDR-Lite to convert back-and-forth. For documentation, I referred to: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-CIDR-Lite/Lite.pm -d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:59:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A331065692 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3DE8FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so581431nfh.33 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=LMYO9rdSzn279OJhXhZc8PoHnU5yyGYuk0a7sKHLhVs=; b=bibDDHMAEJ9KhMvdTLByVPAW8Y7zr2TRgOh3CB3AjeiFu6RY+u8YhKwMs7Abm0IMU2 Hut/5ONWDoOvSetDkWe0Zdgqa+eST6nLaAxrCwWR1RMjxEVaZCcLCmOehKgKAmweZN0i KsXlU9aDMG01ggW3Kk5jxwDsihXta8BclBwFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VXqhPXj8t39EECl3iCxiHbEaIqZgKMDBt1rtYUy6RJFrKTW8UAtaT9RxcF615ZmVUQ U+29MYxCjGJuNRlNhIMpnDVHbSlv6F1RNWUh1Pe0OnxyurGBV4MFHWo0tAQ3YCCeiQ7v JRmDo1A3nL9fo+eEeg7fwHh9y4xwz70dNbksI= Received: by 10.103.228.12 with SMTP id f12mr4423138mur.28.1217606350596; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:59:10 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:59:13 -0000 Let's say I add WITHOUT_SOMETHING to /etc/rc.conf, and remake and reinstall my world. What will happen to the previous install of SOMETHING? Will it be removed or just left there to rot? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:59:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFE0106567B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asenchi@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B48FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asenchi@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so904959wfg.7 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:59:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=d9MQSVe9S7NRXSi4EHh3TjBOXyTlRnh+GgxW554ql90=; b=Zl/TbnuFQA9uDmmdLg8IBmwEGRJCPFJNNBS3snvEy2NacYf/w2Nxrv7F+hYaglcYLT CU9We2sVXngK2cU2aLQP3YwrsFYogKBFWtJs/nJcuc2lJtRhNuBTfBQhtq032eE0ohxE BfZuG8txQNaWNqt3LlVl0EaZymwzAwBhILCrk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=RXDVfQ6aZIqb6p7ASulfCF94C7U1/mXD2GbwR+oIB3VKMKakB/6aZ7p2fxmHblfVFk rNTNMFIK/EqExo6IIOENzepXLuYsNzSrgFwrca+1gelnZOIVkzIxQHOgLXt1Nh1ySTnM l1e1cBJQOWiRjzsm1uKldYwPM57I9ECkK15qc= Received: by 10.142.239.11 with SMTP id m11mr3777638wfh.283.1217604905989; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.18 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d9c091a0808010835o37add3e5s62123bb46c1cb1bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:35:05 -0400 From: "Curt Micol" To: "Redd Vinylene" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: asenchi@asenchi.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:59:38 -0000 man src.conf(5) On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hello! > > Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious > server, not a kindergarten ;) > > I don't want the games group there, I just don't need it! > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- # Curt Micol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:04:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D51065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679F48FC22 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so785738mue.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=LMYO9rdSzn279OJhXhZc8PoHnU5yyGYuk0a7sKHLhVs=; b=bfSLvfkmTzwlYrdshK4Tb0ncEFqL7wLPHbAjNRIa7DssAldY2vn2vvxhK5qVXq69qs 1TVwMde7U/ZkxhjPVfS5xfZZGIU5IVz4jCOof0O9CDtlo+u7j9Ev4UD+rYg3ebhLD2zV 24FJk6fxyvzx4ThHAUQ7y1WhwvHQDRxHNsomE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hO25UFdz6BNkAIpbV8caS0P7vnatERtk/jXT770Evmu9ts8MtmtrARMjW5LWbJDsxg +CwBF+r2RY1IEqpGTsVRO9fCX5bUxo8RdXlrfAmGGlPFhaRKKD/JvQfXlm8k8awK4TN/ lvjWw8HEUPpWQ081Ph0eL2ksWsr3vbcaRZrOA= Received: by 10.103.176.2 with SMTP id d2mr4401219mup.134.1217606672176; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:04:32 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:04:34 -0000 Let's say I add WITHOUT_SOMETHING to /etc/rc.conf, and remake and reinstall my world. What will happen to the previous install of SOMETHING? Will it be removed or just left there to rot? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:06:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C991065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CE78FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (localhost.jarasoft.net [127.0.0.1]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEB32284D; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jara3 (jara-3 [192.168.1.101]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1090E22830; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> From: "Jack Raats" To: "freebsd-stable" , Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:06:33 +0200 Organization: JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-Signed-With-GnuPG: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net Cc: Subject: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:06:36 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? Jack -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFIkzSKPh5RwW/NzC4RAqMKAJ987kbR57nNejUHOaNPOLabP2jKWACgm6Ts iOvTzyGUw1evnXmmHSa6+RA=3D =3Df1r1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:13:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260E1065696 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2841B8FC1D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from max.local (rrcs-74-218-226-253.se.biz.rr.com [74.218.226.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m71GD3JP002865; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:13:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jack Raats Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:13:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> In-Reply-To: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:13:04 -0000 On Friday 01 August 2008, Jack Raats wrote: > I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. > The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. > Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? Sorry, what are you asking? What version of FreeBSD are you using and what do you need help doing? JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:33:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0CD106566C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:33:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2118B8FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71GX4uS009269; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:33:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A2ACDBA8D; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:33:04 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: "B. Cook" Message-ID: <20080801163304.GB86807@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E40D840-E616-41CA-8708-B06904699432@poughkeepsieschools.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: secure access to AS/400 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:33:07 -0000 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:27:12AM -0400, B. Cook wrote: > Hello All, >=20 > Seems OT, but I have been asked to give someone remote access to an AS/= =20 > 400 we have here. > Is there some terminal emulator that I would have to give them? Try x11/x3270 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiTOsAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWTRACcDvTnQxRUINzRg1OPY/E07DOH jTcAn3kr6TL3M/C8AUy1ZhbSqoSziiw0 =yJdS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:36:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E3D106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modelnine@modelnine.org) Received: from jord.modelnine.org (jord.modelnine.org [83.246.72.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378908FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modelnine@modelnine.org) Received: from [192.168.1.37] (a89-182-197-151.net-htp.de [89.182.197.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: modelnine) by jord.modelnine.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0227A40CC0; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:36:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Wundram To: Jack Raats Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:40:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> In-Reply-To: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808011840.33381.modelnine@modelnine.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:36:31 -0000 Am Freitag, 1. August 2008 18:06:33 schrieb Jack Raats: > I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. > The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. > Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? Upgrade to 7.0? How to do that is documented on freebsd.org in the handbook. If the driver isn't available in 6[.x]-STABLE (I have no idea, I run 7-STABLE), it's not been backported, meaning that there hasn't been (or not sufficient) interest in doing that, and I'd presume that you don't want to do that either (or lack the technical skills to do so, which I don't mean in a derogative way), so your only real option is to upgrade. Oh, by the way: it's generally not considered good manners to cross-post to several mailinglists. One is enough, and in your case, -questions was just fine. -- Heiko Wundram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:42:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ACA1065678 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D668FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) X-Trace: 64349263/mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-ACCEPTED/f2s-freedom2Surf-customers/195.137.21.170 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 195.137.21.170 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: njm@njm.f2s.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoQFAHTSkkjDiRWq/2dsb2JhbACBW4lFpSw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,294,1215385200"; d="scan'208";a="64349263" X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net (HELO oberon.njm.f2s.com) ([195.137.21.170]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Aug 2008 17:12:37 +0100 Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71GCbq8004397; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:12:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m71GCba1004396; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:12:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:12:36 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: Redd Vinylene Message-ID: <20080801161236.GA3363@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: Redd Vinylene , questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18cvs (2008-07-02) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:42:07 -0000 In message , Redd Vinylene (reddvinylene@gmail.com) wrote: > Let's say I add WITHOUT_SOMETHING to /etc/rc.conf, and remake and > reinstall my world. > > What will happen to the previous install of SOMETHING? Will it be > removed or just left there to rot? After doing make installworld you should do a make delete-old . During the latter which you will be prompted to delete the various bits which you no longer require. Cheers, Nick. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 16:51:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7A21065678 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost02.isp.att.net (fmailhost02.isp.att.net [207.115.11.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A818FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-19-255-192.bna.bellsouth.net[68.19.255.192]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc02) with ESMTP id <20080801165156H02000v0b0e>; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:51:58 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.19.255.192] Message-ID: <48933F23.1050201@datapipe.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:51:47 -0500 From: Paul Procacci User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:51:59 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: > On Friday 01 August 2008, Jack Raats wrote: > >> I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. >> The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. >> Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? >> > > Sorry, what are you asking? What version of FreeBSD are you using and what > do you need help doing? > > JN > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > To make the device available without recompiling your kernel you do the following: kldload if_zyd To have zyd available after reboots add it to /boot/loader.conf as: if_zyd_load="YES" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 17:02:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D41065689 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525198FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (localhost.jarasoft.net [127.0.0.1]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B2822FFB; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:02:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jara3 (jara-3 [192.168.1.101]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 28A8122830; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:02:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: "Jack Raats" To: "John Nielsen" , References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:02:01 +0200 Organization: JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-Signed-With-GnuPG: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net Cc: Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:02:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Nielsen" To: ; "Jack Raats" Cc: "freebsd-stable" Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 6:13 PM Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE > On Friday 01 August 2008, Jack Raats wrote: >> I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. >> The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. >> Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? > Sorry, what are you asking? What version of FreeBSD are you using and what > do you need help doing? I want to add the zyd device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE. The device driver is available on FreeBSD 7.0. I want to know the staps to backport the zyd drvier to 6.3. Updating to FreeBSD 7 is not (yet) an option. Jack -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFIk0GKPh5RwW/NzC4RAqn2AKCH8ZFPhpeW3flgrr6CbE8SUyCttwCcD0UV Ak+tDf3ApJgKbC/9zgETHSE= =kRjL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 17:26:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEC61065683 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1C08FC24 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so607994nfh.33 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=A1+1LEIunk1IbpNWcPe/kWgFthvUw6CM6BtV36JJUwM=; b=tD3Aup60ht2+ObPSeFm4P+luo4e5KBi1fDP8GrkDe2teCGG1sHJwKqS/7PnUbAP1QY sCwKwmce6Ac85/SINkAsgd2Eln3M1WRN3YCSjcv6T7tbGlX2dgpGz7voEU/UUhEgrYVP eZ1LkRrBAKKP7+JBED2/6HOCZIjWUhxbCT9zM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=D3FbK8do8UJjhztr15EiA2JoDHom1EpzIpLnMN7xnYWPJdqaDH+R4t6ot7m8LnVUgL m7JFByLAwsD+xk2SU9GuyGRm2BHJa6L/96l0+grwhYshT3u6f/9au4HwK0Lb7y9WIVyI VXQ+QBq8BOIyqduB9R19WukaQGSmgITT5Fy7U= Received: by 10.103.131.18 with SMTP id i18mr4436788mun.126.1217611580431; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:26:20 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:26:22 -0000 My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is this the best way to upgrade all of them? Pretty cool huh? - # FreeBSD/i386 mother.reddvinylene.no csup /etc/cvsupfile && \ cd /usr/src && \ make buildworld && \ make buildkernel && \ make installworld && \ make installkernel && \ make delete-old && \ make delete-old-libs && \ mergemaster -U&& \ export D=/usr/jail/camel && \ make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ cd etc/ && \ make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ cd .. && \ mergemaster -U -D $D && \ export D=/usr/jail/box && \ make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ cd etc/ && \ make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ cd .. && \ mergemaster -U -D $D && \ chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* && \ rm -rf /usr/obj/* - Redd Vinylene http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 17:28:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10EF1065674 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0718FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so811231mue.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:28:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=A1+1LEIunk1IbpNWcPe/kWgFthvUw6CM6BtV36JJUwM=; b=mYxC9BuyP4Gmxdl9BHobQrR9aPNXVtPR/g0ZD4zPv7lqELOiFlYL5K/nDp/YsR+ViU ScYD8agFkvIADFZ4bFaGwuUl1va8pryOhzU3ObD0RkvAZcLlS4YXAIudr8lcrONth9nc WDy63z7NsHlpZWstHjl/86sR3Ej3+SNbz5WYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gAyCLGyyBBoH8e38kDnW7ic/do9WwWo0zIrOvmdQqhcrb3GWuZLQKDiJdDnf6qZUGh XDOwegYWCipWTMvqPZoZhgBxlPHxO4IwaLUuEDjSlsG7XqQGg3wPIwg0qJjaZ2S4M5TZ V/BKP/bI+Xu1hbdJ59wXcWlODRE8b9DtJPTVk= Received: by 10.103.227.13 with SMTP id e13mr4442373mur.49.1217611681117; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:28:01 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:28:03 -0000 My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is this the best way to upgrade all of them? Pretty cool huh? - # FreeBSD/i386 mother.reddvinylene.no csup /etc/cvsupfile && \ cd /usr/src && \ make buildworld && \ make buildkernel && \ make installworld && \ make installkernel && \ make delete-old && \ make delete-old-libs && \ mergemaster -U&& \ export D=/usr/jail/camel && \ make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ cd etc/ && \ make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ cd .. && \ mergemaster -U -D $D && \ export D=/usr/jail/box && \ make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ cd etc/ && \ make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ cd .. && \ mergemaster -U -D $D && \ chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* && \ rm -rf /usr/obj/* - Redd Vinylene http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 17:33:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E88106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76B28FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-118-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.118.98]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF05016C014B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m71HXXMM002525 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:33:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:33:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <20080801193332.b854ffd7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:35 -0000 Hi! On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:26:20 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is > this the best way to upgrade all of them? > > Pretty cool huh? Uh, bad idea. :-) If I remember correctly, you cannot update the system within "one rush" if you don't use the binary update with the freebsd-update utility. According to your script > cd /usr/src && \ > make buildworld && \ > make buildkernel && \ seems to be okay up to this point, but > make installworld && \ > make installkernel && \ is not recommended to be done in MUM. Refer to the corresponding section of the handbook: Build world and kernel first, then install the new kernel and reboot the system into SUM with it; then run "mergemaster -p", install the world and run "mergemaster". I think "make delete-old" comes afterwards. But I think you can update the jails camel and box as you described. The handbook will tell you more precisely what to do. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:10:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8F8106568F for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB0C8FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1401031fgb.35 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:10:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=Tp7UsMOQCsCiibnNpglCUg75fnZfV/vvS/W2BT8gabM=; b=f44GbOH31LAhWYt7towGef6icwKy9pXEtIu1zVtyFn13rU0/fqcIkcGdurgwb6Ueb4 ZyUAMTSIkKSCCISADk+T3r6Hctf3bAQOMKkbxmiy3ii5nwhkV6vNuSruki2Qcki1HfCz x8G2JOEUola2UIuKC5ruSwka4LyV4knGsKCNY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tkBTbLNeB0wsjAaxlJ/jLHlanY10TOqZKFaJWsLeGPfYs2RHuIlpFDQ3ZRgkBNUgit xhgQ4kZQyfLMC9NKIZVCPvWx4n80hSgvYF9d294CVJAv3U0VwUl1Szk4n/UyB2nkamBS oDlU3iJJ+ZU5VmJxtvwZytzOwOMYmSQeOHm6s= Received: by 10.103.243.9 with SMTP id v9mr4469260mur.44.1217617820587; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:10:20 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: src.conf: There's no WITHOUT_IPFW? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:10:22 -0000 There's WITHOUT_IPFILTER and WITHOUT_PF, but no WITHOUT_IPFW? /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't mention IPFW being removed. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:16:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B651065671 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605C08FC16 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-118-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.118.98]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A8E51104 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m71JGQOc002778 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:16:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:16:25 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <20080801211625.2abfd4cc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: src.conf: There's no WITHOUT_IPFW? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:16:28 -0000 Hi! On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:10:20 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > There's WITHOUT_IPFILTER and WITHOUT_PF, but no WITHOUT_IPFW? > /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't mention IPFW being removed. IPFW hasn't been removed. You can compile it into your kernel or load the module (I usually do the first one); the tools to control ipfw are part of the base system (/sbin/ipfw). If you don't want to use ipfw, don't compile it into your kernel and don't load the module. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:18:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0DD106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [91.103.162.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971F78FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B346719E023; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EC1119E019; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48935D68.2080603@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:00:56 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Redd Vinylene References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:18:23 -0000 Redd Vinylene wrote: > My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is > this the best way to upgrade all of them? > > Pretty cool huh? > > - > > # FreeBSD/i386 mother.reddvinylene.no > > csup /etc/cvsupfile && \ > > cd /usr/src && \ > > make buildworld && \ > > make buildkernel && \ > > make installworld && \ > > make installkernel && \ > > make delete-old && \ > > make delete-old-libs && \ > > mergemaster -U&& \ > > export D=/usr/jail/camel && \ > > make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ > > cd etc/ && \ > > make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ > > cd .. && \ > > mergemaster -U -D $D && \ > > export D=/usr/jail/box && \ > > make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ > > make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ > > cd etc/ && \ > > make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ > > cd .. && \ > > mergemaster -U -D $D && \ > > chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* && \ > > rm -rf /usr/obj/* It would be better if you post what version you are running and to what version you want to update / upgrade. If you want to use some RELEASE, you can user freebsd-update command for binary update of base and jails. Also it is not good to do all the above steps as one chained command. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:26:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E0910656D7; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC8B8FC08; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71JQCvx051362; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:26:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:42:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200808011213.41335.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808011442.37048.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:26:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.1/7911/Fri Aug 1 08:10:36 2008 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: John Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:26:31 -0000 On Friday 01 August 2008 12:13:41 pm John Nielsen wrote: > On Friday 01 August 2008, Jack Raats wrote: > > I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. > > The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. > > Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? >=20 > Sorry, what are you asking? What version of FreeBSD are you using and wha= t=20 > do you need help doing? =46rom the subject line, I imagine Jack is using 6.3-STABLE and wants to=20 backport the driver from 7.0 to 6.3. Backporting most drivers from 7.0 to= =20 6.x isn't a big deal (can generally just copy over and compile). However,= =20 zyd(4) is a wireless driver and the net80211 wireless networking stack is=20 quite different in 6.x vs 7.0, so that is where it would be complicated to= =20 backport the driver. I'm not intimately familiar with net80211 in either=20 branch, so I'm unsure how much work the backport would be. =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:28:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66D0106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4628FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so848275mue.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZllS49iIS962iJST5DNhB19gZtiXESGIMMUxuwfHcTE=; b=G85KQYGG97PrO1Cy5RcOv44FiiRAjlUkn/PvRY7Vmjv0f6YpO/T1HW7HV6xYfK4ZKE SrfSNsXcRRHVjWKZuJglFJ0bm77P6cnoMaCD4R+syro1I30pT+VgjK9JbXSjJJeIyKiQ sYlTXdiNCydzuXiOxAbvOBlkVbqzgHs3CmtRU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CDeXrZWuyZW/3Eudu5wlK6KhchXm0HecyYNIMGOHiwt65krN/UsCrMWVQmM5E6Kpx0 g/8fWYLain26aKLFdAtnPgoRiXQD4VkGDLDcqSTlKBQ1IQRDFrvurjkiNWKGkAhXD1IQ tRmC7T7gsQPTk0t5cRXZMfJ+xph3DaCWxh8a4= Received: by 10.102.228.2 with SMTP id a2mr4476133muh.79.1217618898563; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:28:18 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: "Miroslav Lachman" <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <48935D68.2080603@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48935D68.2080603@quip.cz> Cc: Subject: Re: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:28:21 -0000 Whatever version you know, right now it's an old 7.0-STABLE to a newer 7.0-STABLE. Improved the script a little though: http://pastie.org/245821 Enjoy! On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Redd Vinylene wrote: > >> My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is >> this the best way to upgrade all of them? >> >> Pretty cool huh? >> >> - >> >> # FreeBSD/i386 mother.reddvinylene.no >> >> csup /etc/cvsupfile && \ >> >> cd /usr/src && \ >> >> make buildworld && \ >> >> make buildkernel && \ >> >> make installworld && \ >> >> make installkernel && \ >> >> make delete-old && \ >> >> make delete-old-libs && \ >> >> mergemaster -U&& \ >> >> export D=/usr/jail/camel && \ >> >> make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> cd etc/ && \ >> >> make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> cd .. && \ >> >> mergemaster -U -D $D && \ >> >> export D=/usr/jail/box && \ >> >> make installworld DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make installworld installkernel DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make delete-old DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> make delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> cd etc/ && \ >> >> make distribution DESTDIR=$D && \ >> >> cd .. && \ >> >> mergemaster -U -D $D && \ >> >> chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* && \ >> >> rm -rf /usr/obj/* > > > It would be better if you post what version you are running and to what > version you want to update / upgrade. If you want to use some RELEASE, you > can user freebsd-update command for binary update of base and jails. > > Also it is not good to do all the above steps as one chained command. > > Miroslav Lachman > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 19:54:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66201065673 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6A98FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m71JsKZ8016846; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:54:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m71JsJUk016843; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:54:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:54:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Mark Wilson In-Reply-To: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> Message-ID: References: <8CAC1FE1B91EC30-116C-2BF2@MBLK-M10.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:54:20 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question re IPs-to-CIDR conversion program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:54:24 -0000 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Mark Wilson wrote: > I'm trying to write a program that will take 2 IPs and return an appropriate CIDR which contains both. > > 3. Point me to another program which does what I need? Net::CIDR has a range2cidr method that will do that. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 20:16:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473D51065678 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47C78FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71KGAC7067890; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:16:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mpRlBk4ABDCD; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:16:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (dsl.daleco.biz [209.125.108.70]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71KG41O067882; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:16:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <48936EFF.8040301@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:15:59 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080719 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Redd Vinylene Subject: [Fwd: Re: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:16:12 -0000 Subject: Re: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:34:59 +0200 From: Redd Vinylene To: Kevin Kinsey >> Redd Vinylene wrote: >>> >>> Let's say I add WITHOUT_SOMETHING to /etc/rc.conf, and remake and >>> reinstall my world. >>> >>> What will happen to the previous install of SOMETHING? Will it be >>> removed or just left there to rot? >>> >>> Thank you! >> >> Do you mean /etc/src.conf? >> >> See build(7), particularly the delete-old and delete-old-libs >> targets. >> >> Kevin Kinsey >> > That is really awesome, thanks guys! > > Yes, /etc/src.conf. Does this look alright for a dedicated FreeBSD > server? It runs jails, named, www, smtp, pop3, imap etc. I want to get > rid of everything I don't need: > > > WITHOUT_ACPI > WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG > WITHOUT_ATM > WITHOUT_AUDIT > WITHOUT_AUTHPF > WITHOUT_GAMES > WITHOUT_I4B > WITHOUT_INFO > WITHOUT_IPFILTER > WITHOUT_IPX > WITHOUT_KERBEROS > WITHOUT_LIBKSE > WITHOUT_LPR > WITHOUT_NCP > WITHOUT_NETCAT > WITHOUT_NIS > WITHOUT_NLS > WITHOUT_NLS_CATALOGS > WITHOUT_PROFILE > WITHOUT_RCMDS > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL > WITHOUT_SHAREDOCS > WITHOUT_SSP > WITHOUT_USB > WITHOUT_WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOL Reed, I'm not expert enough to comment on what you've top-posted here (the contents of src.conf related to your needs). It does look like both of us forgot to do the normal "reply-all" so I'm posting this back to the FBSD Questions list. I will mention that not having sendmail, you may break something (but I'm not sure if that particular knob means that there will be no local mailer at all). Cron(8), for example, uses a local mailer to notify you of cronjob output, and having cron work is a Good Thing(tm) in my experience as a sysadmin. KDK -- I came to MIT to get an education for myself and a diploma for my mother. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 21:10:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4381065672 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f24.google.com (mail-gx0-f24.google.com [209.85.217.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A02C8FC21 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so1589560gxk.19 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.80.19 with SMTP id d19mr6700417agb.97.1217625053474; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.233.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b45sm2177955hsa.6.2008.08.01.14.10.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:10:37 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801171037.610209ab@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080801092757.N5640@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200807312304.11784.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20080801092757.N5640@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/a115qsjq2qAl1/hpdgFrra_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: PCI Gigabit Ethernet network interface card (NIC) recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:10:55 -0000 --Sig_/a115qsjq2qAl1/hpdgFrra_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> re0 in here >> >> re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x81361019 chip=3D0x813610ec >> rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 >> >> "re -- RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8101E PCI/PCIe Ethernet >> adapter driver" >> >> Works like a charm. >> No complains :) >> >lots of versions of this chip are buggy. What versions? --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Fame lost its appeal for me when I went into a public restroom and an autograph seeker handed me a pen and paper under the stall door. -- Marlo Thomas --Sig_/a115qsjq2qAl1/hpdgFrra_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiTe9YACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmOhgCgvupcYZBUkN0f8bZhHIhIG7vi hcsAoNE+ZA3jeUIjZvNsUP/1Bu3/QIxo =nOOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a115qsjq2qAl1/hpdgFrra_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 21:47:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A5F1065673 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f24.google.com (mail-gx0-f24.google.com [209.85.217.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCC28FC16 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so1606999gxk.19 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=z6p+JmoJgRFE6yKw8NNo2aZ/RpUkf+YR+K6kDB752Ao=; b=uheaGsoLqbTj7jb4tJ+O5X2i54fWImvFfiO+5Ot12OxLG2HmehuMMJYNl+co08LVPc EsD2j4QALzs9Im5ZzLE0tvhAzDN8juY3o1B5OAU3wkofpYfTC7vK8T2zc8D51vYuiqnf EWtptEJ/l+NzmI9HhbFQO3zOAALYDK8tKHwIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=P9X7ABIzO6gydrAenF+imUnVkMjdats1JcfsrfjhHB0Y1P6bCbGBeENiuodBkP5WVR 2O0+Z56NA/k1aJgyKHPWIkHHyhWiG74M5Ls41jYuqVTmMvipUHXZBWceF1ulTMQ0Ql1/ 0HfqCkrK1wkf90sbfYB28H/JMQrEXAu4GevZg= Received: by 10.100.10.15 with SMTP id 15mr17389676anj.131.1217627272501; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:47:52 -0400 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: "Redd Vinylene" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:47:54 -0000 On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hello! > > Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious > server, not a kindergarten ;) > .. but you will miss out on all the murphy's law quotes.. one of the few enjoyments a sysadmin has left in this world. -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 22:15:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB8B106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lorin.lund@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E298FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lorin.lund@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so680383wah.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=LBvuXLm28/dGvaiygJcOAJldik7IeI1Vc6XvRTQOkkY=; b=akttShK8hOYsgLL99DnRz9ylFFLE0mcEveksPHlNYTUZVYMEQbfhX8m7PvrhfkDFx3 ZmQGv/Vxmo3YLnJ+f8LLBRHzIvymf3h81i7KXsl5IQ2S3mkd1X95BgmDdgBpbQjtLQf2 o5fCSx6o67k12GQgJbVFJdjF+FLatdU8YXhms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=pcj1ouMuDvQQNuEhtsJVsJfhqc+2xb5pEiBEKaICwSbmXjjduWlNI2ugmVSMM4Elbj zNEvAo2bmCSMrtpqdUkbXXkhvi4Cgk2uY0OdkcqYi9lF6N+OJIAPJ3zilpLdAXkk94Y7 VPASK2FHrrD77ej2ZEbXh6WskSBymDiLE+/nA= Received: by 10.115.49.11 with SMTP id b11mr12213158wak.117.1217627225681; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?70.192.32.218? ( [70.192.32.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g25sm2586475wag.4.2008.08.01.14.47.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48938452.8000209@infowest.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:46:58 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4839792C.5090809@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4839792C.5090809@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lorin Lund Subject: Shutdown problems on virtual PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:15:14 -0000 I run FreeBSD 6 under Parallesl Workstation. When I try to shutdown with shutdown -p now It acts like the -p isn't there. I'm not sure what power management protocol Paralells Workstation uses. Nor do I know what the default is for FreeBSD 6 (default kernel). What would be the next older power management? Is there some knob to turn to tell FreeBSD 6 to use something older? Or do I have to rebuild the kernel? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 22:23:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0D106564A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A35738FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Aug 2008 21:56:53 -0000 Received: from e178255254.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [10.0.0.111]) [85.178.255.254] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 01 Aug 2008 23:56:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #31543762 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/EHEcniIbEjEtGyhG1eF4ZZv/JAoVdgitLHHPMxr SAqCU5SGHcAWG6 From: Helge Rohde To: freebsd-questions Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:56:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808012356.38143.heroh@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.55 Subject: X won't start up; "No matching Device section" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:23:36 -0000 Hello List, I got an old TFT that uses a special connector to a CHIPS ct65554 graphics card. However, although the ct65554 is listed as supported, it is not recognized by the chips driver. System is FreeBSD 7-Release AMD64. I am pretty sure that the same xorg.conf worked under i386. pciconf -lvc claims device='65554 Flat Panel/LCD CRT GUI Accelerator'" for the card, however although i do have an xorg.conf "Device" section containing Driver "chips" Chipset "ct65554" X wont start up. Xorg.0.log complains: (II) CHIPS: Driver for Chips and Technologies chipsets: ct65520, ct65525, ct65530, ct65535, ct65540, ct65545, ct65546, ct65548, ct65550, ct65554, ct65555, ct68554, ct69000, ct69030, ct64200, ct64300 (II) Primary Device is: (WW) CHIPS: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:3:7:0) found (EE) No devices detected. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 22:59:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D871065676 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pcloches@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD678FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pcloches@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1035979wfg.7 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WVUieoGUnFu67N7doReav9dLD4Jm/I3zBMhBFnIRiDU=; b=QookrckT/yjOQuBru8XICwzzgog673kz7vI6mXMVVpWaDvsJEzx6EGAARXQNrX6vmN vMXD1WHjYKRBZ/s99Ff8g+qy3QOJv1mab93nJlXyFZrS/GNMMrKEPmRDhYuJkGtdPNXw Uysrk4H9deYPflFzfKM/28Ig3TxijBLS0H1Qk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=C3gSPrvbISXp1j0tudHtnm+Gsq26bHiJ6/xl2GjC58qjZCzdM8PEgKCqrQnZ8P7Xsy UHmJWvrO5l5GRfevwt/s4m2sk7XlpNyOocE/pbcMqVdGhrCOheXshwbknZZko00Tqu6K 0N82LOkvra7TyngmTz0O7hXX5rtXEUnkiIMW4= Received: by 10.142.43.7 with SMTP id q7mr3938133wfq.11.1217631570653; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.218.3 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <34394a3a0808011559u764842fdv4aad492d61d73faf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:59:30 -0700 From: "Patrick C" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20080610001335.E50875@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <484D9C13.9090607@baylessfamily.org> <20080610001335.E50875@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Troubleshooting a 3Ware 9550SX under 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:59:31 -0000 This is a very important point. By turning the cache on, you have not resolved an underlying performance issue, if there even is one. Please try dd again with a well-sized bs= parameter, or use some more accurate reporting like iozone, sysbench, etc. Also, I am not sure how much memory is on the card, but that is likely COMPLETELY in cache at that point so you're not learning anything. Write a couple gigs to get some real numbers. -Patrick 2008/6/9 Wojciech Puchar : >> dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile >> 165760+0 records in >> 165759+0 records out >> 84868608 bytes transferred in 25.028232 secs (3390915 bytes/sec) > >> I think I ought to be able to get more than 3.2MB/sec out of this card, > > with default 512 bytes blocks - not much more > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 23:09:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757521065690 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@vfemail.net) Received: from vfemail.net (dell.vfemail.net [69.11.239.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988F8FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@vfemail.net) Received: (qmail 32301 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2008 23:09:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO inmail.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 23:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 32277 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2008 23:09:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vfemail.net) (vfemail@172.16.100.20) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 23:09:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 40058 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2008 23:09:02 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 40019, pid: 40055, t: 0.5313s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO bofh-enc.shahriars.net) (freebsd@vfemail.net@69.11.239.68) by mail.vfemail.net with ESMTPA; 1 Aug 2008 23:09:01 -0000 Message-ID: <4893A516.4020809@vfemail.net> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:06:46 +0000 From: FreeBSD User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080531) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030609050905040408020402" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: [Fwd: Re: connecting to a secured Windows 2003 terminal server] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:09:23 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030609050905040408020402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear List members I am posting this question again since so far I have not been able to find any solution. But I do believe there is one -- which I cannot find and hopefully someone will be able to share her/his effective solution with me. Thanks --------------030609050905040408020402 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: connecting to a secured Windows 2003 terminal server.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="Re: connecting to a secured Windows 2003 terminal server.eml" X-Account-Key: account4 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd@vfemail.net Received: (qmail 65406 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2008 00:47:49 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 65397, pid: 65403, t: 0.1365s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.92/m: Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (72.14.246.241) by mx1.vfemail.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 00:47:49 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (mx1.vfemail.net: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 72.14.246.241 as permitted sender) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 8so13423190agc.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:47:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Jbd40W8XKsh8vnPU4oq+FEaYE7QdQy6sXOlkQCdBauw=; b=TM5WZCHdzVAhupS+neVMM1oyUkGofKbAGjFiLU/gSHSHWptI0YZtc9InMw2f/Z8l2M z5jN8VbSnxSg2OhDeUJVQM9myjFx0mECcHUU5vBeiqQlo0vpmVptmd0p9c50IXTGPljQ pB97eEAq0aLNiZjHVtdQ1XuctUsCvY8Ib/Bdk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=fC7kGCSQcqUX0mZ5wjnYQBjooPalGE7l4SAh/XaaFNVg0ORlwBKR4AaxpmnMIiLono 71buP8PjKNwLpo/4nAl6bk2Hs6yNUjlmZGiU7j/6+ubFKwNGcVNKhUf9aI1NGgIcYF+A w4cQ6eNWWYZu25t/hY+CIgqdnJe2hx/zXmopg= Received: by 10.100.57.6 with SMTP id f6mr2868510ana.58.1216774067528; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807221747i3946fcb8w730f0aa72db156eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:47:47 -0400 From: "darko gavrilovic" To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: connecting to a secured Windows 2003 terminal server In-Reply-To: <48867D4A.2050605@vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3424_19396356.1216774067528" References: <48867D4A.2050605@vfemail.net> ------=_Part_3424_19396356.1216774067528 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, is 3389 filtered in any way between you and that server? On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:37 PM, FreeBSD wrote: > Dear folks > > my sincere apologies if this has been discussed earlier, which I seriously > doubt, since even after googling for nearly five days I couldn't find any > solution. > > Recently my company has updated their server to Windows 2003. The earlier > 2000 server didn't have SSL enabled, so rdp/rdesktop worked for me without > any problem. But now, as I try to connect to the server, it simply gives me > ERROR: recv: Connection reset by peer > > I know for a fact that the server is working fine, since all IE and remote > desktop softwares are working (they have to install the certificate at the > beginning, once). But how can I connect from my freebsd box? > > any pointers/links sujjestions are highly welcome. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- regards, dg "using fsdb(8) and clri(8) was like climbing Mount Everest in sandals and shorts. Since writing that, I've tried them more than once and discovered that I was wrong. You don't get the shorts." -- M.W. Lucas ------=_Part_3424_19396356.1216774067528 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Hello, is 3389 filtered in any way between you and that server? On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:37 PM, FreeBSD <[1]freebsd@vfemail.net> wrote: Dear folks my sincere apologies if this has been discussed earlier, which I seriously doubt, since even after googling for nearly five days I couldn't find any solution. Recently my company has updated their server to Windows 2003. The earlier 2000 server didn't have SSL enabled, so rdp/rdesktop worked for me without any problem. But now, as I try to connect to the server, it simply gives me ERROR: recv: Connection reset by peer I know for a fact that the server is working fine, since all IE and remote desktop softwares are working (they have to install the certificate at the beginning, once). But how can I connect from my freebsd box? any pointers/links sujjestions are highly welcome. Thanks. _______________________________________________ [2]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list [3]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[4]freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- regards, dg "using fsdb(8) and clri(8) was like climbing Mount Everest in sandals and shorts. Since writing that, I've tried them more than once and discovered that I was wrong. You don't get the shorts." -- M.W. Lucas References 1. mailto:freebsd@vfemail.net 2. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 3. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions 4. mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org ------=_Part_3424_19396356.1216774067528-- --------------030609050905040408020402-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 23:34:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7588B106566B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f24.google.com (mail-gx0-f24.google.com [209.85.217.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2678FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so1654063gxk.19 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.114.19 with SMTP id m19mr15434157agc.71.1217633659175; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.233.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm3556763wra.15.2008.08.01.16.34.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:34:02 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080801193402.2a3b09a4@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4893A516.4020809@vfemail.net> References: <4893A516.4020809@vfemail.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/8zt8RsoCCt4_Yd7ySKKEPxF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: connecting to a secured Windows 2003 terminal server] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:34:20 -0000 --Sig_/8zt8RsoCCt4_Yd7ySKKEPxF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:06:46 +0000 FreeBSD wrote: >I am posting this question again since so far I have not been able to=20 >find any solution. But I do believe there is one -- which I cannot >find and hopefully someone will be able to share her/his effective >solution with me. If you cannot get an answer here, you might try the Microsoft site. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb430837.aspx =46rom time to time I have gotten some useful information there myself. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Romeo wasn't bilked in a day. Walt Kelly, "Ten Ever-Lovin' Blue-Eyed Years With Pogo" --Sig_/8zt8RsoCCt4_Yd7ySKKEPxF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiTnXQACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMkeawCgmhAAQYpmI0uO/KkdW++KSMnV 4nMAn3LAZIiCzZ9W/XDaZSDSqWsOHELM =5r4F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8zt8RsoCCt4_Yd7ySKKEPxF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 00:24:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D4E106567A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867C38FC21 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4Y00BM26EOUJ91@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:23:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:23:12 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <48932909.7040305@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801202312.6fcbbd7b@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20080801101549.54603d85@verizon.net> <48932909.7040305@FreeBSD.org> Cc: glarkin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Find what options a precompiled package uses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:24:01 -0000 Looks like I made a bad assumption, that there would be something similar to /var/db/ports/PORT_NAME/options for packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 00:27:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031091065673 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F2A8FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-118-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.118.98]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544E9512FE; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:27:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m720RgEK006077; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:27:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:27:41 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Lorin Lund Message-Id: <20080802022741.f94abcb3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <48938452.8000209@infowest.com> References: <4839792C.5090809@gmail.com> <48938452.8000209@infowest.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shutdown problems on virtual PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:27:45 -0000 On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:46:58 -0600, Lorin Lund wrote: > I'm not sure what power management > protocol Paralells Workstation uses. Nor do I know what the > default is for FreeBSD 6 (default kernel). What would be the next older > power > management? Is there some knob to turn to tell FreeBSD 6 to use > something older? Or do I have to rebuild the kernel? As far as I know, power management by ACPI is the default. In order to shut down a system that does not have ACPI, but APM, ACPI needs to be disabled in most cases, as well as APM needs to be enabled manually. I don't know how "Paralells Workstation" handles this, but older PCs (with APM, but without ACPI) can be shut down this way. (I hope I did understand your question as intended.) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 00:30:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507461065680 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3258A8FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gurvich@verizon.net) Received: from localhost ([71.249.92.53]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4Y00KH86QNZ5A3@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:30:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:30:22 -0400 From: David Gurvich In-reply-to: <200808012356.38143.heroh@gmx.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20080801203022.53e3542d@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <200808012356.38143.heroh@gmx.de> Subject: Re: X won't start up; "No matching Device section" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:30:51 -0000 Have you loaded all the kernel modules you need and installed xf86-video-chips? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 00:53:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B315106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138B08FC25 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so1247661wra.27 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:53:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JpZSwH4dDUWHQzODZ9JcXrVLjJgLQldIB6gThxJGmBQ=; b=mfV9WxPizF8hcoH0svTRAav2k6o1eS0reaMd23lUVRZG3x2xPdVUPishfLimqBcslx wov7NfQ0BYzK8PFgXdEri+ehe31gW/LOFQ/cDrth2c3+JMgf2oGUvxqenshi66TPHopq 0cDoVkRgsPil7qftbrHrc1CXQNywDjQ/4Wl1s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=IAgJI+TY/PTwE0S+f87/zd1PBfZViUW7XzGReT9d5aylMuyFKJ1k4rxBsPElu5lv7p GKcLK4bq7m9rm7tyTLKms1mE9RuV0KMHdZWx1C9eBfx0Ad/CZ9OgUuOJVm33FFXMeCl8 cPdFvap/eunbXr9EG50Zx3MfJ0zSNIWfFCoNg= Received: by 10.90.31.8 with SMTP id e8mr10979927age.68.1217636685971; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.30.10 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0808011724n25179c9coeaa94393ffd40dd7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:24:45 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Jack Raats" In-Reply-To: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6A7AD37501FA4199B44BBBB03B0EE368@jarasoft.net> Cc: freebsd-stable , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:53:41 -0000 On 8/1/08, Jack Raats wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. > The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. > Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? > You need to obtain these revisions to compile zyd: sys/dev/usb/if_zyd.c 1.13 sys/modules/zyd/Makefile 1.1 Revision 1.14 was when the net80211 wireless networking stack was committed. Scot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 01:18:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462711065687 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from fallback-in1.mxes.net (fallback-out1.mxes.net [216.86.168.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176CC8FC16 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by fallback-in1.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA490163F79 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:02:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CAB23E3E7 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:02:21 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802020221.06533c48@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:18:49 -0000 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:31:22 +0200 "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Hello! > > Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious > server, not a kindergarten ;) > > I don't want the games group there, I just don't need it! "Games" is a bit of a misnomer, Most of the old FreeBSD games have been moved into games/freebsd-games. What's left is not much more than fortune (for login tips), and includes several things that could equally well be regarded as utilities: primes(6), factor(6), random(6). Before you remove "games", make sure you don't use any scripts that rely on these utilities. For example the ports system ignores RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES if you don't have random(6) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 01:38:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD01065675 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gene@nttmcl.com) Received: from mx0.nttmcl.com (MX0.nttmcl.com [216.69.68.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45ED8FC16 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gene@nttmcl.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.nttmcl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF87E80040D for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:10:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx0.nttmcl.com Received: from mx0.nttmcl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx0.nttmcl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id If65ps2xZszM for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from voipwifidhcp166.nttmcl.com (vpn6.nttmcl.com [216.69.67.6]) by mx0.nttmcl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA94F80040A for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4893B3F9.3020104@nttmcl.com> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:10:17 -0700 From: "Eugene M. Kim" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 7.0-RELEASE-amd64 install on MacBook Pro 4,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:38:01 -0000 Greetings, When trying to boot the MacBook Pro 4,1 (G4 with Intel Penryn) off the 7.0-RELEASE-amd64 installation CD, the kernel hangs after the CD-ROM probe, and the SATA drive probe never seems to complete (I don't see any adX entry). Booting without ACPI does not seem to make any difference either. Has anyone solved this? Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, Eugene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 03:44:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24E31065671 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 03:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com) Received: from smtp1.ojc.nuvio.net (smtp1.ojc.nuvio.net [208.77.12.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35B48FC1E for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 03:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com) Received: from rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com (devel.ojc.nuvio.net [208.77.14.20]) by smtp1.ojc.nuvio.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7201B9d015765 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:01:11 -0500 Received: from rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m72016D8003346 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:01:06 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id m72016nC003343; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:01:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:01:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200808020001.m72016nC003343@rotorwash.ojc.nuvio.com> To: questions@freebsd.org From: "received@postcard.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:44:31 -0000 You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . [1]http://mailer1.key-one.it/postcard.gif.exe . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset . (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.) . Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard, you can do so by visiting this web address: http://www2.postcards.org/ (Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard" button beneath your postcard!) . We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment to send a few yourself! . Regards, 1001 Postcards http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ References 1. http://mailer1.key-one.it/postcard.gif.exe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 04:23:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB4F1065678 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169428FC1D for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([202.69.172.55]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:08:05 -0700 From: "joeb" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:08:15 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2008 04:08:06.0202 (UTC) FILETIME=[5DBB69A0:01C8F455] Cc: Subject: mount_msdosfs usb flash stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeb@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:23:35 -0000 On 6.2 release of FBSD trying to mount a usb flash memory stick. The stick has a msdos file system on it and has been loaded with files using windows xp. When I plug the stick into my FBSD box I get console msg about da0 device as usb flash memory stick. All looks good at this point. When is issue this command, mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt I get this error msg ' invalid argument' . Also tried this format of the command with same results. mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt (note typing error on msdos in first post. Sorry) What am I doing wrong here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 04:23:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422081065679 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3F28FC1E for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([202.69.172.55]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:06:24 -0700 From: "joeb" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:06:35 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2008 04:06:24.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[214310E0:01C8F455] Cc: Subject: mount_msdosfs usb flash stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeb@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:23:35 -0000 On 6.2 release of FBSD trying to mount a usb flash memory stick. The stick has a msdos file system on it and has been loaded with files using windows xp. When I plug the stick into my FBSD box I get console msg about da0 device as usb flash memory stick. All looks good at this point. When is issue this command, mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt I get this error msg ' invalid argument' . Also tried this format of the command with same results. mount -t msdo /dev/da0 /mnt What am I doing wrong here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 04:49:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ACB1065672 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A068FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from max.local (rrcs-74-218-226-253.se.biz.rr.com [74.218.226.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m724nFJP048837; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:49:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joeb@a1poweruser.com Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:49:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808020049.54301.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: mount_msdosfs usb flash stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:49:17 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008, joeb wrote: > On 6.2 release of FBSD trying to mount a usb flash memory stick. The > stick has a msdos file system on it and has been loaded with files using > windows xp. When I plug the stick into my FBSD box I get console msg > about da0 device as usb flash memory stick. All looks good at this point. > When is issue this command, mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt I get this > error msg ' invalid argument' . Also tried this format of the command > with same results. mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt (note typing error > on msdos in first post. Sorry) Most of the time usb drives are partitioned like regular hard drives. Do an "ls /dev/da0*" to see what you have, but you'll probably want: mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /mnt JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 06:18:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCFD106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26CE8FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 12376 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2008 01:18:14 -0500 Received: from 203-166-248-146.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (203.166.248.146) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Aug 2008 01:18:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:18:08 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802161808.7604e683@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <48936EFF.8040301@daleco.biz> References: <48936EFF.8040301@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:18:12 -0000 On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:15:59 -0500 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > I will mention that > not having sendmail, you may break something (but > I'm not sure if that particular knob means that there > will be no local mailer at all). Depends - you may have postfix installed and /etc/mail/* configured to use it instead...in which case there may not be much need for base's sendmail. Other than that, I definitely agree with you. > Cron(8), for example, > uses a local mailer to notify you of cronjob output, > and having cron work is a Good Thing(tm) in my experience > as a sysadmin. :-D _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "So limp of brain that for them to conceive an idea is to risk a haemorrhage. So limp of body that their purple dresses appear no more a dixative of housing nerves and sinews than when they hang suspended from their hooks" Mervin Peake, "Gormenghast", chap. 2, on the Earl's twin sisters I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 06:19:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBE4106564A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72838FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 12444 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2008 01:19:54 -0500 Received: from 203-166-248-146.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ayiin) (203.166.248.146) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Aug 2008 01:19:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:19:48 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802161948.64bb620c@ayiin> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: src.conf: WITHOUT_SOMETHING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:19:52 -0000 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:04:32 +0200 "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Let's say I add WITHOUT_SOMETHING to /etc/rc.conf, and remake and > reinstall my world. for the record, /etc/>s Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF501065671 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFB08FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostcorps@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so771761wah.3 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:51:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkXnxM466jZIF1hy1BxYE+to/7Aixt0krqVFhiCjeS4=; b=kqbjXqecv4zuIYZeWbssdKiOYMXsu9PWsuHRarRjxfcUdcZHqTpMIfAQDsEyrBMFn3 VVRaDUDAsOydzbzdppPEZ1BD9IE125dDasWeWXbx7E7SvTJhw9bsv8SZPnRqSapOTyGM CF32RMpwNEW2Yw0A+8dpdEGdg5uqP2pZar7XE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MvNdFE3hwh+i9uzYd+7dVDje5pHJR+xf3jRWX08Tb4NIS0nIHoKaA+yeU90lYqOEUm woDG1J4hcdLh6di7LBlQIdZQZhP12LBZmxdRcmzGeGUmAhs1c55T5FGUa1nKPyCsTQ3J FSF9zsTw6qzSvbnoDBnVCWklm6BxB76SGAHHY= Received: by 10.114.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr12544209waf.205.1217659864634; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [203.206.184.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j7sm4178422wah.9.2008.08.01.23.51.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489403D1.2060009@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:50:57 +1000 From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080802161948.64bb620c@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <20080802161948.64bb620c@ayiin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Software RAID options for a media server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:51:05 -0000 Hi Guys, As my dream of a hardware based SCSI RAID root disk was so soundly dashed, I have been trying to figure out the most appropriate software implementation for a media server. Which sw RAID is best for streaming media? The options I have are: RAID1z, the redundancy is not my concern so much as performance over a network, but if the reduction in performance is negligible I may opt for it for fun. or RAID0 using gvinum, a far more complex option so I'd like to get an idea of its suitability. Otherwise if there are any other avenues please fill me in. I am at a loss on which way to go... Thanks =^_^= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 07:12:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929791065674 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net (lk.84.20.249.154.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net [84.20.249.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485778FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463B22289F; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:12:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from delusion.skoberne.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (delusion.skoberne.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42519-02; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.15.2] (simian.skoberne.local [192.168.15.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nejkopejko@skoberne.net) by delusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE71522829; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <489408D8.40009@skoberne.net> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:12:24 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Nejc_=8Akoberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <20080731120921.GA9754@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20080801111816.6e277b1d@ayiin> In-Reply-To: <20080801111816.6e277b1d@ayiin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: Mitar , Weiss , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "no toe capability on..." X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:12:30 -0000 Hey, >> no toe capability on 0xc2e66400 Looks like this is was fixed 7/31/2008: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_offload.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.4.2.1&r2=text&tr2=1.4.2.2 That was fast! Bye, Nejc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 07:30:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B67F1065680 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BDA8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m727UTdV008415; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:30:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m727UQnO008412; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:30:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:30:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: joeb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080802093025.K8411@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: mount_msdosfs usb flash stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:30:40 -0000 da0s1 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, joeb wrote: > On 6.2 release of FBSD trying to mount a usb flash memory stick. The stick > has a msdos file system on it and has been loaded with files using windows > xp. When I plug the stick into my FBSD box I get console msg about da0 > device as usb flash memory stick. All looks good at this point. When is > issue this command, mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt I get this error msg ' > invalid argument' . Also tried this format of the command with same > results. mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt (note typing error on msdos in > first post. Sorry) > > > What am I doing wrong here? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 10:22:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73461065678 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.poughkeepsieschools.org (mail.poughkeepsieschools.org [64.72.66.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF8A8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from [69.206.230.225] (port=50502 helo=iMac.at.home) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1KPEFe-000Nqc-H2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:22:18 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.93.1/7915 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:22:18 -0400 Message-Id: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> From: "B. Cook" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:22:17 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: get periodic to not scan a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:22:19 -0000 hello all, I have a machine doing backups with backuppc (excellent program btw) and I have them being stored in /exports /dev/ad4s1h 57G 31G 21G 60% /exports /dev/ad4s1h on /exports (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) it is now almost 6:20 am and periodic has been running since 3:01.. and it will complete in another 4 hours.. root 92866 0.6 0.1 3064 1488 ?? D 3:01AM 1:00.93 find / exports -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm -o+x ) ( - perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 is there something I can do to get periodic to not look in /exports? I have the BackupPC 'backup folders' and symlinks to /usr/src /usr/obj and /usr/ports. Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 11:33:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699061065677 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A8E8FC1B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 83504 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2008 11:33:44 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (HELO localhost) (192.168.123.10) by mail.matrix.net with SMTP; 2 Aug 2008 11:33:44 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:33:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> In-Reply-To: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> X-Face: 9K^F42eGrHAbAe?%/Jn(.sAeg9d{Ur6`x<[+LZ46Plx#sTFr]9_>|#(?~v6X,=?utf-8?q?2=7EBeL=23=3A7kxV8=23s=3BUP=0A=09=7C?=>X.=B,VvQ"}!^Zb}AGD:Um.+; P=%U6W Cc: "B. Cook" Subject: Re: get periodic to not scan a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:33:47 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008, B. Cook wrote: > hello all, > > I have a machine doing backups with backuppc (excellent program btw) > and I have them being stored in /exports > > /dev/ad4s1h 57G 31G 21G 60% /exports > > /dev/ad4s1h on /exports (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) > > it is now almost 6:20 am and periodic has been running since 3:01.. > and it will complete in another 4 hours.. > > root 92866 0.6 0.1 3064 1488 ?? D 3:01AM 1:00.93 find / > exports -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm -o+x ) ( - > perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 > > is there something I can do to get periodic to not look in /exports? > > I have the BackupPC 'backup folders' and symlinks to /usr/src /usr/obj > and /usr/ports. > > Thanks in advance > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Set up PRUNEPATHS in /etc/locate.rc. Cheers ch -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x1A9BE943 OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 12:19:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720051065685 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449F38FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E1A23E3E7 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:19:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:19:09 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802131909.07ccddab@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> References: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: get periodic to not scan a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:19:14 -0000 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:22:17 -0400 "B. Cook" wrote: > hello all, > > I have a machine doing backups with backuppc (excellent program btw) > and I have them being stored in /exports > > /dev/ad4s1h 57G 31G 21G 60% /exports > > /dev/ad4s1h on /exports (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) > > it is now almost 6:20 am and periodic has been running since 3:01.. > and it will complete in another 4 hours.. > > root 92866 0.6 0.1 3064 1488 ?? D 3:01AM 1:00.93 > find / exports -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm > -o+x ) ( - perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 > > is there something I can do to get periodic to not look in /exports? The above search is looking for setuid binaries, if you mount /exports as noexec and/or nosuid then it wont get searched. You may also need to curtail the locate search as someone already mentioned, although that's only weekly and it only searches directories that the user "nobody" can read. 7 hours does seem a very long time though, these searches only take a few minutes for 1.3TB on my desktop machine, and it's several years old. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 12:30:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E6D10656D2 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.poughkeepsieschools.org (mail.poughkeepsieschools.org [64.72.66.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6431A8FC22 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from [69.206.230.225] (port=65175 helo=iMac.at.home) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1KPGFZ-000PsD-5n for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:30:21 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.93.1/7915 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:30:21 -0400 Message-Id: <69728418-D91B-41C4-B4E0-F3913584AEC4@poughkeepsieschools.org> From: "B. Cook" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080802131909.07ccddab@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:30:20 -0400 References: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> <20080802131909.07ccddab@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Re: get periodic to not scan a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:30:22 -0000 On Aug 2, 2008, at 8:19 AM, RW wrote: > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:22:17 -0400 > "B. Cook" wrote: > >> hello all, >> >> I have a machine doing backups with backuppc (excellent program btw) >> and I have them being stored in /exports >> >> /dev/ad4s1h 57G 31G 21G 60% /exports >> >> /dev/ad4s1h on /exports (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) >> >> it is now almost 6:20 am and periodic has been running since 3:01.. >> and it will complete in another 4 hours.. >> >> root 92866 0.6 0.1 3064 1488 ?? D 3:01AM 1:00.93 >> find / exports -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm >> -o+x ) ( - perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 >> >> is there something I can do to get periodic to not look in /exports? > > The above search is looking for setuid binaries, if you mount /exports > as noexec and/or nosuid then it wont get searched. > I will see what happens when I do that.. as I remember it did something to break the building of world and I think port building as well.. this /exports also holds /usr/obj /usr/src and /usr/ports they are symlinks to here. Again from what I remember having nosuid and/or noexec on /usr/obj and/ or /usr/ports was a 'problem' as well.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 12:37:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9451065754 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9B638FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heroh@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Aug 2008 12:37:14 -0000 Received: from e178255254.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [10.0.0.111]) [85.178.255.254] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 02 Aug 2008 14:37:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #31543762 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19dFIhGodRdZJKa8eqXk4fceZSgBo+SjxMBOrhqEj PlKxrzmcEfayFE From: Helge Rohde To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:36:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808012356.38143.heroh@gmx.de> <20080801203022.53e3542d@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20080801203022.53e3542d@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808021436.56587.heroh@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 Subject: Re: X won't start up; "No matching Device section" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:37:19 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008 02:30:22 David Gurvich wrote: > Have you loaded all the kernel modules you need and installed > xf86-video-chips? I am not aware of any kernel modules that i would have to load explicitely. And, yes, as indicated by the Xorg.log snippet, the chips driver is present. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 12:48:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFFD1065678 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5AF8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C340423E49B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:48:08 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802134808.5d7b3eee@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <69728418-D91B-41C4-B4E0-F3913584AEC4@poughkeepsieschools.org> References: <88DEC8CC-1BBC-4AAA-AECF-0F8736043212@poughkeepsieschools.org> <20080802131909.07ccddab@gumby.homeunix.com.> <69728418-D91B-41C4-B4E0-F3913584AEC4@poughkeepsieschools.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: get periodic to not scan a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:48:12 -0000 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:30:20 -0400 "B. Cook" wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2008, at 8:19 AM, RW wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:22:17 -0400 > > "B. Cook" wrote: > > > >> hello all, > >> > >> I have a machine doing backups with backuppc (excellent program > >> btw) and I have them being stored in /exports > >> > >> /dev/ad4s1h 57G 31G 21G 60% /exports > >> > >> /dev/ad4s1h on /exports (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) > >> > >> it is now almost 6:20 am and periodic has been running since 3:01.. > >> and it will complete in another 4 hours.. > >> > >> root 92866 0.6 0.1 3064 1488 ?? D 3:01AM 1:00.93 > >> find / exports -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm > >> -o+x ) ( - perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s ) -print0 > >> > >> is there something I can do to get periodic to not look > >> in /exports? > > > > The above search is looking for setuid binaries, if you > > mount /exports as noexec and/or nosuid then it wont get searched. > > > > I will see what happens when I do that.. as I remember it did > something to break the building of world and I think port building > as well.. > > this /exports also holds /usr/obj /usr/src and /usr/ports they are > symlinks to here. In that case I'd try disabling the search with daily_status_security_chksetuid_enable=no in periodic.conf, and possibly putting a modified version in /usr/local/etc/periodic/security. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 14:16:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84F81065676 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2274E8FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1798671fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:16:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=1HNCxokkW6NJ08KrAMfUu+9QUpQpKVpq/thDtyrTXCY=; b=I0V61HqkfOVS44ac1xwmcuP4vgNPFJk0DiTWStA1trZiUIR1LXioWA8kn8o8Eq2cSU gWcuv9fbDaCu1UREPVRTbi1A0lEtA3Wdds3HZpafagVRJ/4Yf5KKchCBs1O7lFBIWcUo Hw1OHagyTkGyD2R3PnTB61O0SN1MiHqaQFJG4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=x+HsiGzvPslGaIrci7CRJodsTxu2+kRk90sJvfdM+XGXWrRF6pOROkjBgpo5EP0tTx wFOqLGF8zbLvV5NBA9PnHlVsYSua9x70de0NvcP8uhIk9BeuqRPIxXdihlzZEC+O2/JB NWt/2Mkrzm3dN11Jv3YggsVUkNo3y2SOmBjuM= Received: by 10.86.68.20 with SMTP id q20mr8471781fga.2.1217685052432; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm3034458fga.1.2008.08.02.06.50.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:50:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> Subject: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:16:52 -0000 hi, i have a new freebsd 7-release installed and very new to anything outside windows and may have jumped into the deep end to soon- but freebsd is the only thing i liked and want to keep, mess around with and hopefully learn something; so all i know is what i got from the handbook and the net this past month, and hope i can ask a few quick questions where i am a bit unclear (only looking for short answers and some diretion if possible). firstly - i have installed kde3 and xfce4 from packages (like most of it -> xorg,etc) and have tried updates before with different results. i don't mind messing things up, as long as i can somehow surf or check mails - but would like to do a *proper* update. firstly, are [freebsd-update] and [cvsup stable src.all] necessary before installing anything from ports? and are ports considered stable or current? or are they automatically matched to the installed version? also, do portsnap and cvsup ports do the same thing? i've tried cvsup exactly after portsnap and it still seems to edit/update the ports tree. why i'm confused is that i get alot of warnings when many ports try to build, and many hiccups in apps once they are installed, and i don't know which way to go --- gcc manual and fixing my environment, build options, etc,, or if it still something in the actual ports? i'll stop there, sorry for this, but the thing is that between an install off the offical discs and updates to date, i easily have 350+ packages to do at once and have been jumping around from manual to manual still unsure where to start. thanks in advance for any info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 15:32:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD4E106564A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1348FC16 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB58423E49B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:32:53 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:32:57 -0000 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:50:48 +0200 mcassar wrote: > firstly - i have installed kde3 and xfce4 from packages (like most of > it -> xorg,etc) and have tried updates before with different results. > i don't mind messing things up, as long as i can somehow surf or > check mails - but would like to do a *proper* update. > > firstly, are [freebsd-update] and [cvsup stable src.all] necessary > before installing anything from ports? freebsd-update does a binary update to the base system, csup of src-all is for fetching source to rebuild the base system. You can build ports and base independently BTW you should be using csup (in the base system), not cvsup. cvsup was written in modulo2, csup is a rewrite in C with fewer dependencies Also if you are new to FreeBSD, you should probably not be using a stable branch, these are stable development branches. Consider using a security branch like RELENG_7_0, and later moving to RELENG_7_1 and so on. > and are ports considered > stable or current? or are they automatically matched to the installed > version? There's only one version of ports, the builds automatically adapt to your basesystem version. > also, do portsnap and cvsup ports do the same thing? i've tried cvsup > exactly after portsnap and it still seems to edit/update the ports > tree. They're more or less the same. portsnap is faster, but it's for ports only and is less flexible. > why i'm confused is that i get alot of warnings when many ports try > to build, and many hiccups in apps once they are installed, and i > don't know which way to go --- gcc manual and fixing my environment, > build options, etc,, or if it still something in the actual ports? You don't need to set much, if anything. Read the entries in /usr/ports/UPDATING before doing an upgrade. Most build problems will fix themselves within a day or two if you resync the ports tree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 16:33:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9B01065680 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230068FC18 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1849770fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:32:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=A1iNtB9lTxB7Q/6fDI9kxi5jXOuLuBkaONTOsWfAX7A=; b=NImI/ZGR5XakbpM8tLFCF3r5/BubBHlhYjOFJnAI2jYYo1BdpqtGEIejatvo/41SxG zeA3E65EqpwFjOYL56L3f33XLB9vvjeJbFDeFkHW8IJN/ceZYT8Q8JPDChz+0Rpgqrvf 81/63gDuGQsD39ekbBkWSbI5bL1jWMyBmWBIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=H+yCBNcL1jzUR3WRN9TmESnyzFkRQY1xpglflypCgfMNyPz+d08UwZMXwNIROaijGA Hz4pqp4mu8QG8A2ZVtWHgBom01A9B/BdZd0UqIlmOucdmXSm/vBFfYaq8JhHeROPI8sk L8Kg8mYxz5AZJT2tXStjc8b8u2SZ//LM/XEd4= Received: by 10.86.82.6 with SMTP id f6mr8540147fgb.73.1217694778529; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm674717fga.8.2008.08.02.09.32.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:32:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:33:01 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008 17:32:53 RW wrote: > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:50:48 +0200 > > mcassar wrote: > > firstly - i have installed kde3 and xfce4 from packages (like most of > > it -> xorg,etc) and have tried updates before with different results. > > i don't mind messing things up, as long as i can somehow surf or > > check mails - but would like to do a *proper* update. > > > > firstly, are [freebsd-update] and [cvsup stable src.all] necessary > > before installing anything from ports? > > freebsd-update does a binary update to the base system, csup of src-all > is for fetching source to rebuild the base system. You can build ports > and base independently > > BTW you should be using csup (in the base system), not cvsup. cvsup was > written in modulo2, csup is a rewrite in C with fewer dependencies > > Also if you are new to FreeBSD, you should probably not be using a > stable branch, these are stable development branches. Consider using a > security branch like RELENG_7_0, and later moving to RELENG_7_1 and so > on. > > > and are ports considered > > stable or current? or are they automatically matched to the installed > > version? > > There's only one version of ports, the builds automatically adapt to > your basesystem version. > > > also, do portsnap and cvsup ports do the same thing? i've tried cvsup > > exactly after portsnap and it still seems to edit/update the ports > > tree. > > They're more or less the same. portsnap is faster, but it's for ports > only and is less flexible. > > > why i'm confused is that i get alot of warnings when many ports try > > to build, and many hiccups in apps once they are installed, and i > > don't know which way to go --- gcc manual and fixing my environment, > > build options, etc,, or if it still something in the actual ports? > > You don't need to set much, if anything. Read the entries > in /usr/ports/UPDATING before doing an upgrade. Most build problems > will fix themselves within a day or two if you resync the ports tree. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" damn, thanks - I had mistaken stable to be what is release; i had come across the difference at some point but didn't realise when i tried cvsup (which i also mistook to be more recent than csup). I only tried csup on ports once and wasn't too sure i should since the handbook or somewhere mentioned the ports tree should be empty the first time you run it; and got the impression you should only use either or (csup vs portsnap). anyhow i think that only my nvidia driver instructions mentioned it relies on what i think are system sources (kernel related - if i'm not mistaken) - but i haven't touched that yet. I hate to bother any further but have one thing to clarify about building attempts - when building anything, if that's ok. I only have a basic understanding of C so far, and can't really tell how critical warnings are - such as undefined this and that, defined but not used...etc, when building a port. should i stop those and see how i should fix them or let them proceed as long as they're not errors? I can live with my current system for now, but have a few things i need to update eventually. again, many thanks for the reply and clarifying. mcassar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 16:48:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644381065680 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF84A8FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1856022fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Ipo6Vc5mra6oLll/SNyqZ8tXlKxeI/5K/NYiX8ZyvQw=; b=UeyNXlZjk7hE85v5AlHlhRza4BrxvHW6qwp5fcRnnu2oUhK2RkBc71aXfcaZ2OAAbb 9HCWHICdBqnHiaM7kIhdIgsMluNhNKYjMcEpaIGchGvvSUF0kIBytL3dwkIo79p/v/yN 5zNvMq2+ih+jVOrQkaApxJ+6VlJDVnSvewcac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xu8rcIGwuiXpLs19ZY4USNIK1z8zS5bR5OBeASVXO0YZPTZ0vivK93CGtD4OZn3Af+ Lr5imJwTHJmJpcjst6m8xQYazrfhK32Mr+KGXmMveEilEB07x/iQsdKIsUyaXrblvXlU bwCo+t+0L15fl+j1YvQE/LBhHBjQvtsv66RAg= Received: by 10.103.249.19 with SMTP id b19mr4748859mus.50.1217695707793; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:48:27 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: "darko gavrilovic" In-Reply-To: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:48:29 -0000 Adding WITHOUT_GAMES="YES" to /etc/src.conf most certainly didn't work. Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway? Yes, one or two (out of one or two million) might need it, but can't we make it available to them in some other way? As a module or a port or something? Thanks! On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:47 PM, darko gavrilovic wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Why can't I make world without the "games" group? I run a serious >> server, not a kindergarten ;) >> > > .. but you will miss out on all the murphy's law quotes.. one of the > few enjoyments a sysadmin has left in this world. > > > > > > -- > regards, > dg > > "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get > ..." -- M.W.Lucas > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:08:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061A81065675 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835AE8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1863919fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=ZNhLoHUV9Tllp55/bfb6VizWoYBeBR3e+it/KR2loTk=; b=kmiIOUFEPQT89ni2pILQN1lj1pc122dWvNT/geq4xSUw+nZlzanwSWPwFUu7fzYH2I MVUR2LfxmOZiObImaUPQRh1iA/A7UhA0FjOnGsemVKdVI2xOI5A9UjYNBe/eslOctI/u 7rw7kgjEWQkgHyQEMYGuOY1nvRjSxilH8ObAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=aS+tDX2XwW2ixJB1gD/1XQ4A95pwocOvELZhSAQ9hq/uMPTlrG1fbcqIUAsrsy6PMK dY0iW8yxYeNlL4/NPTFDINDejfqoEx8Il3cHhc1J0vpoXkQJTu0Ijplfp9L0z3ty8YT2 Hnz5toKLke1ruzAN3muDHgfVPkqsqeyi+f55E= Received: by 10.103.223.9 with SMTP id a9mr4747694mur.87.1217696930891; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:08:50 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:08:53 -0000 Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them all to jail_box_ip="ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line ever? Like this? jail_box_ip="66.252.2.4,\ 66.252.2.5,\ 66.252.2.6,\ Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. Nor does: export x=$(cat ips);export jail_ips=''; for ip in $x; do export jail_ips="$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=$(echo $jail_ips | sed s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); Is there a more beautiful alternative? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:15:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FE4106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ED38FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so669614ywe.13 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Nheyelm8NdS/1mcyZzeILZyQE76WNhCm5ac8YNJdqF4=; b=oWF+JDcH6cwPjyrNOxDtd1V0UGons3SFqypeWwatDKchoS3nwiBAo4+qvmZg9EoIDf OJIZRoDGLXBbxT3m2MDrKDj0FHGBS4gY9XQUQl9JvQqDOjmYdWSwC1bbsNw49uiG03wx QPTl/T4b5VYwS7FF/SGlER9Sah6WhEb8kOuXM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LJUFMy/GMDfrThAe/79GHP8btZl81MIuD3hidmYS241veZEW57yuaUFtSC0q4JwLXx TxhMw6ZOJi5/f6ykEjiQ/fAIq4ARGoJE9htSeArcnwIaHAn/3nI+HF3K0VzhLyG+uPd1 R11/F65IHmippJBzYrGan42K9CR/fbwoEdaIw= Received: by 10.151.102.16 with SMTP id e16mr5311955ybm.80.1217697336257; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.141.2 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b30fd140808021015m69f993e3g84f0dbe169621023@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:15:35 +0100 From: davidcollins001@gmail.com To: Ross In-Reply-To: <1341640629.20080730121019@connection.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1b30fd140807291632v491323d4jb4371ec1303bd5a9@mail.gmail.com> <1341640629.20080730121019@connection.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pxeboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:15:37 -0000 Hi, Thanks both for your replies. I think the top of that article applies to me, in that I am trying to do something that I don't fully understand! I am fairly confident that I have the DHCP and TFTP setup correctly in as much as I get pxeboot on the booted machine (and I have gotten it working in linux). So here is my understandin at the moment: At boot time the netcard does its dhcp thing, gets an ip address pulls the "filename" from the tftp server (which is pxeboot). At this point pxeboot executes and acts much like loader. It mounts the nfs server at "option root-path" specified in the dhcpd.conf on the server, then loads boot/loader.rc from the mounted drive, then all the lovelies of BSD loader begin. I think that now I have this in my head straight I am able to get it working. I tried the following in my boot/loader.rc. The main reason for the oddities in my last email was that I didn't understand what the .rc and .conf files did, the 3 read lines were mainly debugging and trying to understand what was happening. > echo Loading /boot/loader.rc > > set mfsroot_type="mfs_root" > set mfsroot_name="/mfsroot > set vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:/dev/md0c" > > load -t mfs_root /mfsroot > > autoboot 5 At this point I still get the compter rebooting (I have gunzipped mfsroot to avoid the bug with it).. I am not convinced that I have loader.rc setup correctly. Where are the filenames in it relative to, is it relative to the nfs mount point too, in which case should the file be /boot/mfsroot? Is it possible to see an example of someones loader.rc that works? I have also tried tftp only pxeboot by making pxeboot with "make -DLOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=YES" but I don't think that I had the files correctly located. Am I correct in thinking that in this case it will search for boot/loader.rc relative to the tftp server path? I found a book in my library that had a section on pxe booting, I was sad to see that although they had described setting up the dhcp and tftp servers they completely glossed over the actual setup of and how to use pxeboot! Thanks for help, it is greatly appreciated. David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:17:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB3C1065672 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499658FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1867435fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tNDv7CrkcFavrYRbNBPbCSxo4d11F5tR1vqdcce9Ymc=; b=NvvHtK6FuMmxpsEGG56eo1cCa7lRToaSpVRqg1wSBrdda7IFexn+99g6cF0474kyw4 l92C/CY2Ltqe25jw+ESMHq5cR6RyBFmTXeqkg4gHUatZmXPniev2qKq3i6G2ncGOUAVq kT/0AMqIAeVPuBDOcOi5HZN4HZ8PEXRAQAnY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=XCQVv6se8HeEGiRtEbGPL+WtPWXjyMTvcELDLSnTXpnc0bKnFTwdoqk0Gl/jm90Jrw h/LLSy17U1hli0TfpxnScFqE8xa0CuPss7KPgq/W4Qo+MA64BtPz8gi2ebDxip0pUxV3 5Xf4Lcjuy1L/zCPD2rEfwsczxC5oM/uiXxovc= Received: by 10.103.213.19 with SMTP id p19mr4760145muq.70.1217697456885; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:17:36 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:17:38 -0000 Here's what I got so far: http://pastie.org/246189 And this is just wishful thinking I guess: http://pastie.org/246190 On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them > all to jail_box_ip="ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line > ever? > > Like this? > > jail_box_ip="66.252.2.4,\ > 66.252.2.5,\ > 66.252.2.6,\ > > Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. > > Nor does: > > export x=$(cat ips);export jail_ips=''; for ip in $x; do export > jail_ips="$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=$(echo $jail_ips | sed > s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); > > Is there a more beautiful alternative? > > Thanks! > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:20:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7E41065675; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC98FC0A; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id EE6A68C081; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:55:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:55:05 -0500 To: Redd Vinylene Message-ID: <20080802165505.GA13814@soaustin.net> References: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: bugs@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org, darko gavrilovic Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:20:39 -0000 On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:48:27PM +0200, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway? Because no one has done the necessary QA work to factor things out and make them work. mcl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:27:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA651065676 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9408FC2A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so2088508rvf.43 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3J9u6gG9wBeEjVIa/YcbCgagRNdCALso5kRo9aBEL30=; b=BleFHtHtSluuD3hFHCfUKSq44n28dSM5c8KGAd/vwoaTusy1pwGoR4dX7s7O41ggan 1U5l2Zg05pqFEy9+tB2+mVqa4/A6YYmcSxffvUWCaPxCcEb3JAKy1t7SC8dYwArmV/PC KwezM8YwIpzLVn1JgjsHjGUd40digqf/Fh9Jo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=KHTR0JtAFbIF4pJQVeLV2/QeQQ5cf5iz9Ki0oBIUmga4MgWrwaDVM8JbQT/TDI7LcV zDjeDYd4H23JeJ9CPQ3vYqMUM32XN3mWREqSjBVi2qtYTfiXvdVDRGZPminQU4SGj1UK njV173qktnZH7HwibUhL1Znv0OmGPP2/VS360= Received: by 10.141.129.14 with SMTP id g14mr6636640rvn.56.1217696602575; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.153.20 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:03:22 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Redd Vinylene" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, darko gavrilovic Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:27:58 -0000 2008/8/2 Redd Vinylene : > Adding WITHOUT_GAMES="YES" to /etc/src.conf most certainly didn't work. > > Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway? > There can be, and has been, said the same about nearly every part of the base system, at some point. Perhaps these few utilities amuse one or two people, though I suppose a "professional" operating system wouldn't include anything like minesweeper or freecell . . . -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:36:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F8C1065671 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C23B8FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KPL28-0005Zb-PY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:36:49 +0000 Received: from pool-138-88-130-114.esr.east.verizon.net ([138.88.130.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:36:48 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-138-88-130-114.esr.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:36:48 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:38:20 -0400 Lines: 74 Message-ID: References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-138-88-130-114.esr.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:36:53 -0000 mcassar wrote: [snip] > > I only tried csup on ports once and wasn't too sure i should since the > handbook or somewhere mentioned the ports tree should be empty the first > time you run it; and got the impression you should only use either or > (csup vs portsnap). I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point out a very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two different sup files, as they will need to download different collections of material. For example this: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0 src-all combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates to RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections. I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the difference is here: *default release=cvs tag=. ports-all Please notice that if you use the "tag=." with "src-all" you will pull down HEAD, which is the "bleeding edge" of development and not what a beginner should be using. But when used with the ports "collection" you will get an up to date ports tree. > anyhow i think that only my nvidia driver instructions mentioned it relies > on what i think are system sources (kernel related - if i'm not mistaken) > - but i haven't touched that yet. Generally speaking before building something like the nvidia drivers using the ports system the best first step is to refresh the ports tree. With all dependencies tracked and updated you'll likely have more success. Notice, for instance, that the nvidia driver depends on having what we call the "linuxulator" installed. It'll do this for you but you may have to enter a line in your /boot/loader.conf to ensure the linux.ko kernel module gets loaded every time at boot. You will usually see some more instructions at the end if you need to do anything special. Also, be aware that the nvidia driver is only currently working with i386, _not_ amd64. Even if only using packages you should _still_ update the ports tree, as the package system relies on it for dependency tracking as well. > I hate to bother any further but have one thing to clarify about building > attempts - when building anything, if that's ok. I only have a basic > understanding of C so far, and can't really tell how critical warnings are > - such as undefined this and that, defined but not used...etc, when > building a > port. should i stop those and see how i should fix them or let them > proceed as long as they're not errors? I can live with my current system > for now, but have a few things i need to update eventually. > When you use ports and compile stuff, you may see all manners of warnings, errors, and sundry garbage spewing forth from the compiler. Most of this, most of the time, is benign and not something to get overly concerned about as it is fairly normal. The exception is if the build errors out and completely quits, and there is an error sequence that will indicate whereabouts it bombed. Sometimes ports do get broken and need fixing, but most ports have a person who maintains them. If/when many people see the same error someone usually notifies the port maintainer and he/she then looks into fixing it. But generally speaking, if the build completes and runs without segfaulting just ignore what you may have seen scrolling by while building. Most of the time it's just "noise". :-) -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:37:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60841065676; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287DF8FC0A; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m72Hbkit096965; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:37:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m72Hbkit096965 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1217698668; bh=AC1ipECTabPf2S c1LtN8ycYRLzo77avwTk1j1OQDPQI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type: Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Mes sage-ID:=20<48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Sat,=2 002=20Aug=202008=2018:37:35=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20Infracaninophile|User -Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.16=20(X11/20080726)|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20Redd=20Vinylene=20|CC:=20questions @freebsd.org,=20freebsd-jail@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20jail_box_ ip=3D""|References:=20|In-Reply-To:= 20|X-E nigmail-Version:=200.95.6|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type :=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3 D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------eni g9ECDFE44CF1717F897ADFB13"; b=xHHnfHjoG8pYyjM6Gq9m8rUUrdfcxiU75Ptn2 Af1BH9xdYpzw1ZyGC8heEk6Z7WzMB4VSh2O0JFW2559cJDbKvI8rpnImbDQhZEM8mL7 k+LigPnw9L64bzpqd1k/RdpP0s8KUEZeAvDQXdYPA/IgbnMOyJ6gQYqZMcMe/de5VCw = Message-ID: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:37:35 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Redd Vinylene References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9ECDFE44CF1717F897ADFB13" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:37:48 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7915/Sat Aug 2 04:45:09 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:37:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9ECDFE44CF1717F897ADFB13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Redd Vinylene wrote: > Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them > all to jail_box_ip=3D"ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line= > ever? >=20 > Like this? >=20 > jail_box_ip=3D"66.252.2.4,\ > 66.252.2.5,\ > 66.252.2.6,\ >=20 > Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. >=20 > Nor does: >=20 > export x=3D$(cat ips);export jail_ips=3D''; for ip in $x; do export > jail_ips=3D"$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=3D$(echo $jail_ips | = sed > s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); >=20 > Is there a more beautiful alternative? /etc/rc.conf is just /bin/sh code. All you need to do is set the variables -- usually by assigning a static string, but you can use whatever constructs you want. Well - within reason. Making something as critical as the system boot process depend on a bunch of other files or processes is not a good idea on the whole. You can include multi-line whitespace in the variables by using single=20 quotes: jail_box_ip=3D'66.252.2.4, 66.252.2.5, 66.252.2.6, 66.252.2.7' Assuming that the init script that processes this data isn't phased by the inclusion of a bit of whitespace. Or you can generate the required numbers, assuming they are consecutive: jail_box_ip=3D$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 5 4 ) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9ECDFE44CF1717F897ADFB13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkiUm2oACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxPfQCgicUz6ZnHAMgR6W6XLFcFlDdU NKQAn2U0jJauJIAvei1Bug3aQ95RcuPa =A+Wv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9ECDFE44CF1717F897ADFB13-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:48:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A2D1065675 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4498FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+YN=336cba11@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE9A23E49B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:48:37 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080802184837.7cbed956@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: <82f3feb90808011447sa4062e4k16a69d678bff4893@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: I can't make world without the "games" group? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:48:42 -0000 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:48:27 +0200 "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Adding WITHOUT_GAMES="YES" to /etc/src.conf most certainly didn't > work. > > Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway? It's largely a consequence of having a coherent OS, rather than a kernel and third-party packages. > Yes, one or two (out of one or two million) might need it, but can't > we make it available to them in some other way? As a module or a port > or something? Like I already said, that's been done, the actual games went to a port. I don't see why you care so much about removing 3.2Mb. BTW please stop cross-posting to bugs, if you think you've found a bug, you should go through proper channels and file a PR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 18:07:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3BE106568A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60F98FC1A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1161371mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DN0LuGIqaozeMlWDtpWGbc9e2towiFvSpC1CFRLfljU=; b=sum5pHUEBx0AEl47IrzHMDDJuN7PTuxmvUUd0xM/LEdjvruira6hGtPeM+k4xXNnqS WCDMsInYVgE6657GiQZIUiclPAPLHAoKmBNQ4Gs+VH4jSVKtwsldf3kHPy67ETDqqG3h tDdltXiovzvakXygsZ/1JhPP426oyzcUKtFIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UuCFvy3WCNmNkJoZYgMf3tJP5LRzkf8ZQvu5upNSU7XVDueQHDrpqOAenogBy2kHVM 89tOSqwFz8yRMHniFN3XGdMMjmbACW7kYFhXzYAoVtwCjOZZxQW25yZfHyXvCY48DTfF MMT6OugaNZ67/gj+NhJ6sik/HTNve+TFvo2cU= Received: by 10.103.172.7 with SMTP id z7mr797901muo.40.1217700453540; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:07:33 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: "Matthew Seaman" In-Reply-To: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:07:35 -0000 jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 124 4 ) What a gorgeous solution ;) Thanks man! On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Redd Vinylene wrote: >> >> Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them >> all to jail_box_ip="ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line >> ever? >> >> Like this? >> >> jail_box_ip="66.252.2.4,\ >> 66.252.2.5,\ >> 66.252.2.6,\ >> >> Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. >> >> Nor does: >> >> export x=$(cat ips);export jail_ips=''; for ip in $x; do export >> jail_ips="$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=$(echo $jail_ips | sed >> s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); >> >> Is there a more beautiful alternative? > > /etc/rc.conf is just /bin/sh code. All you need to do is set > the variables -- usually by assigning a static string, but you > can use whatever constructs you want. Well - within reason. Making > something as critical as the system boot process depend on a bunch of > other files or processes is not a good idea on the whole. > > You can include multi-line whitespace in the variables by using single > quotes: > > jail_box_ip='66.252.2.4, > 66.252.2.5, > 66.252.2.6, > 66.252.2.7' > > Assuming that the init script that processes this data isn't phased > by the inclusion of a bit of whitespace. > > Or you can generate the required numbers, assuming they are > consecutive: > > jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 5 4 ) > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 18:10:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63E1065682 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C098FC1A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1161970mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RbAx4SPPujQHe87SYGvFNJP127wiVPgdVVsWLhStHA0=; b=KSP99BKXwYxogHtTJcXIeMhQLrc6eYm7+6SZLp7B6qGxLvh5UPDjbC0jXIn+S9RNbc oC4B/RcMASrNzG7aePLrB9PlZQE4GzANv5qNFEWPFavx6hd/HJFGZa6DT+fNrX01LC+5 KPQMFZ6i8ZmC9mzCzQuqq/d7uaPR2N9/5LPPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=eq25z5MCgQc1v4qIzu6cOxFSCvDzmlfYaKddcO09Ium6wCeUaUFHfbUGT6O6ZcqrWP oI73DkeJFWniL2xVOk/HyVQ7bE5ndWs/Bwfgk+kUhsgH2ETKDE/fcduM0iuW8CpRMdpY 3hqb340tRqX5NGf95Q/WeZxg3h+bgTzWdSS70= Received: by 10.103.198.20 with SMTP id a20mr4768898muq.56.1217700622379; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:10:22 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: "Matthew Seaman" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:10:24 -0000 Can something similar be used for my ifconfig_rl0_aliasN="inet 66.252.2.N netmask 255.255.255.255" as well? On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 124 4 ) > > What a gorgeous solution ;) > > Thanks man! > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Seaman > wrote: >> Redd Vinylene wrote: >>> >>> Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them >>> all to jail_box_ip="ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line >>> ever? >>> >>> Like this? >>> >>> jail_box_ip="66.252.2.4,\ >>> 66.252.2.5,\ >>> 66.252.2.6,\ >>> >>> Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. >>> >>> Nor does: >>> >>> export x=$(cat ips);export jail_ips=''; for ip in $x; do export >>> jail_ips="$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=$(echo $jail_ips | sed >>> s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); >>> >>> Is there a more beautiful alternative? >> >> /etc/rc.conf is just /bin/sh code. All you need to do is set >> the variables -- usually by assigning a static string, but you >> can use whatever constructs you want. Well - within reason. Making >> something as critical as the system boot process depend on a bunch of >> other files or processes is not a good idea on the whole. >> >> You can include multi-line whitespace in the variables by using single >> quotes: >> >> jail_box_ip='66.252.2.4, >> 66.252.2.5, >> 66.252.2.6, >> 66.252.2.7' >> >> Assuming that the init script that processes this data isn't phased >> by the inclusion of a bit of whitespace. >> >> Or you can generate the required numbers, assuming they are >> consecutive: >> >> jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 5 4 ) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard >> Flat 3 >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate >> Kent, CT11 9PW >> >> > > > > -- > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 18:41:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492471065685 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE668FC1E for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1900352fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=4gUgTPbZ9hzALXdgnrr9vMyf9h6Lihm31EJBFyOznDM=; b=Cnnq37AAhh2YhzFY3v+I5dQyVRkYSOcsJh0HJdG6nUmTyLsDlvLVT4+GqaRa1M2032 jz/9ruFnAFcRS9a07SD+ze/wcVdBr1uQcP0xy+16x6OAetnDZKivCq/AMCLtFvQQSxWw vh5kqIZMSpC/CeZSwQ3Ox3+Q04oTbjmyslYJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=GzFUmem/HPQrtSyIN2HKPW0CP/uszsN0HJDW1g6yiqcppPSDeVD2xV1L/ce+B5bwJ8 QWE/2r1gxZPGwTRgktblNuU5GtTuIOBpNnnX5cpa+eKrQ0O88KtmmA1ZbU6EdEKUSAcR vEmd/InvuGmXGseZw5yRRLYgdmG9KGZjRf814= Received: by 10.86.83.2 with SMTP id g2mr8660519fgb.54.1217702515443; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm3351412fgb.7.2008.08.02.11.41.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:41:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808022041.51216.marshc187@gmail.com> Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:41:57 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008 19:38:20 Michael Powell wrote: > I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point out a > very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two different sup > files, as they will need to download different collections of material. For > example this: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0 > src-all > > combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates to > RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections. > > I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the > difference is here: > > *default release=cvs tag=. > ports-all > > Please notice that if you use the "tag=." with "src-all" you will pull down > HEAD, which is the "bleeding edge" of development and not what a beginner > should be using. But when used with the ports "collection" you will get an > up to date ports tree. now this makes sense, i wasn't too sure from reading the handbook so i thought i'd play safe and use the example ports-supfiles, but then used the example stable-supfile instead of whichever is for release. lives and learns. > > anyhow i think that only my nvidia driver instructions mentioned it > > relies on what i think are system sources (kernel related - if i'm not > > mistaken) - but i haven't touched that yet. > > Generally speaking before building something like the nvidia drivers using > the ports system the best first step is to refresh the ports tree. With all > dependencies tracked and updated you'll likely have more success. Notice, > for instance, that the nvidia driver depends on having what we call > the "linuxulator" installed. It'll do this for you but you may have to > enter a line in your /boot/loader.conf to ensure the linux.ko kernel module > gets loaded every time at boot. You will usually see some more instructions > at the end if you need to do anything special. Also, be aware that the > nvidia driver is only currently working with i386, _not_ amd64. > Even if only using packages you should _still_ update the ports tree, as > the package system relies on it for dependency tracking as well. > > > I hate to bother any further but have one thing to clarify about building > > attempts - when building anything, if that's ok. I only have a basic > > understanding of C so far, and can't really tell how critical warnings > > are - such as undefined this and that, defined but not used...etc, when > > building a > > port. should i stop those and see how i should fix them or let them > > proceed as long as they're not errors? I can live with my current system > > for now, but have a few things i need to update eventually. > > When you use ports and compile stuff, you may see all manners of warnings, > errors, and sundry garbage spewing forth from the compiler. Most of this, > most of the time, is benign and not something to get overly concerned about > as it is fairly normal. The exception is if the build errors out and > completely quits, and there is an error sequence that will indicate > whereabouts it bombed. Sometimes ports do get broken and need fixing, but > most ports have a person who maintains them. If/when many people see the > same error someone usually notifies the port maintainer and he/she then > looks into fixing it. > > But generally speaking, if the build completes and runs without segfaulting > just ignore what you may have seen scrolling by while building. Most of the > time it's just "noise". :-) > > -Mike > with the nvidia-driver, i've tried both ways 1-> using the ports tree off the install discs without updating (which has a ver 100...,, something and seems to work ok with xorg from packages) ,,, 2 -> after updating the ports tree (which has ver 173..something) and seems to work better if i update xorg from ports. The thing is, this usually goes like dominos and ends up in updating one thing after another; and with at least 350 packages to update at once, i easily loose track and just hope for the best. I've had different results from that with the system as a whole, generally with good improvements on one end, and some broken stuff on the other, but only seen a segmentation fault once, now that you mention it. (it was with firefox but only that one time - never happened before) So overall i wanted to rule out those warnings with updates in general, know how critical they are and whether i needed to go through configuration files first and what not. thanks for all the info - everything starts to make sense as you go. mcassar > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:11:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4B6106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B88FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1911255fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=am4LTefj6jEcwszAYf6o0BiwNYke/vI7rk/UrwsUWSY=; b=bW0XjSpF6DKjhmIMoDV5VOCR13uQr6R3gmxJp7/Ckte3oqxvuUdWK2E4475UsGlXkW ygR+vFrz+0dEiKV/e72ut8EgGGAhWS86d0Fy29b3XTPG2X7tWgYiC4Runtva4wEZ89F4 f12zocwPOWgIsrw3rIvVjdwsoBFg8cnVCx7Cs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jFZ2feQ9Obsl1kZcWZgzy4HBEuJU17QJcCgkRc5LDYkJeVRmlnlbAtlf04VEmkXjCD 0jMOSBjRLV8ccYOcbhNavWhlg7mnT57kxDrtbWsHfT9cySKMqDgywPG8UzNiPJt43rDB oIjln8B912HXl3p5Kw/nDKgxXUUjyXd/e9z0k= Received: by 10.103.6.6 with SMTP id j6mr4786434mui.89.1217704307583; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:11:47 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Reducing 124 ifconfig lines in rc.conf to just 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:11:49 -0000 Greetings! I got 124 ifconfig lines going from ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet 80.252.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" to ifconfig_rl0_alias124="inet 80.252.2.127 netmask 255.255.255.255". Is it possible reducing it all to just 1 line using a for loop or jot or something? -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:19:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704791065681 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [64.81.218.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356D18FC2A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 55956 invoked by uid 1008); 2 Aug 2008 20:24:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (kalin@el.net@68.173.244.62) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 2 Aug 2008 20:24:46 -0000 Message-ID: <4894B222.1040602@el.net> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:14:42 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Client only supports checkout mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:19:02 -0000 hi all... why would i get : "Client only supports checkout mode" when i do; csup /cvsup_file on a new freebsd 7 install what does it mean?! thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:28:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF96C1065683 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2626A8FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl100-65.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.107.65]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id m72JSRbQ015895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:28:33 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m72JSQ0a003952; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:28:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m72JSObl003951; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:28:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: mcassar References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:28:24 +0300 In-Reply-To: <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> (mcassar's message of "Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:32:53 +0200") Message-ID: <873aln8bdz.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: m72JSRbQ015895 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.81, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.59, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:28:42 -0000 On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:32:53 +0200, mcassar wrote: > damn, thanks - I had mistaken stable to be what is release; i had come > across the difference at some point but didn't realise when i tried > cvsup (which i also mistook to be more recent than csup). First of all, a hearty "welcome" :) You've only been reading about FreeBSD for a month, but you already managed to install fairly big packages, like KDE and XFCE, learn about csup, supfiles, the ports, and a lot of other stuff. Congratulations on the progress, and we hope you will enjoy FreeBSD as much as many of us also do. > I only tried csup on ports once and wasn't too sure i should since the > handbook or somewhere mentioned the ports tree should be empty the > first time you run it; and got the impression you should only use > either or (csup vs portsnap). One of the important details about keeping up to date with FreeBSD is that you usually have *two* options for almost everything: - Update from the source - Update from 'binaries' (1) The source side of things The full source to the base system and the full source of the Ports, including change history (like who made a change, when, and why), is available online. This is an important part of the whole FreeBSD "culture", and it works in several nice ways: (a) You can go "back" when a change is made but you don't like it, (b) you can see who made a particular change and why, and this works a lot of time both as a tracking tool and, almost as importantly, (d) as educational. So if you want to learn more about how a fairly large body of source code is maintained for several different architectures by a large, distributed team of enthusiastic volunteers, the full history of FreeBSD is available for browsing. The source for FreeBSD is available through a variety of means. Tools like CVSup, csup, and Subversion can be used to pull copies of the source with or without its full history. The same tools (CVSup and csup) can be used to pull and periodically re-synchronize copies of the source for: the base system, the Ports collection, our documentation, or our web site. If you plan to build several versions of the source tree, from one of the various "branches" of development, it is nice to be able to switch from one version to the other without heavy utilization of the network. In this case, CVSup is a great way of pulling full "mirrors" of the CVS repositories. But this needs a fair amount of disk space (slightly more than 2 GB the last time I checked for a full repository mirror of the src/, doc/, www/ and ports/ repositories). (2) The 'binary' side of things On the other hand, if you don't really want to dig that far into the "source" part of things, and you just want to get some work done, you can use a second collection of "update tools" like: * freebsd-update For updating the binaries of the base system. * portsnap For downloading snapshots of the /usr/ports tree * portupgrade with the -PP option For updating the installed third-party packages, using only the prebuilt binary packages of the FreeBSD port-builders team. The choice between checking out the source from CVS and using the prebuilt code whenever possible is something only *you* are qualified to make for yourself. Disk space constraints, limits to the time you can put into keeping the system update, and the level of "bleeding edge" you want to keep up with may influence your final decision and push towards one or the other option. The nice thing about it all is that you *do* have a choice :-) > I hate to bother any further but have one thing to clarify about > building attempts - when building anything, if that's ok. I only have > a basic understanding of C so far, and can't really tell how critical > warnings are - such as undefined this and that, defined but not > used...etc, when building a port. should i stop those and see how i > should fix them or let them proceed as long as they're not errors? I > can live with my current system for now, but have a few things i need > to update eventually. The short answer to "Should I bother?" is "Sure, please do. Before you start 'hacking' at ports, however, we should make it clear that a lot of the existing problems are already fixed and it takes a certain amount of dedication, time and effort to fix the remaining bits.". The longer answer, which is slightly more interesting IMHO, is... The number of broken, completely bogus or just 'unportable' assumptions people make when they write software is mind-numbing. It is often utterly incomprehensible and absolutely stunning how many or how serious assumptions some third-party tools make. All this leads to a lot of the warnings you mentioned above. The FreeBSD port maintainers commonly make an effort to fix these problems as part of the "porting effort". This is why many of the ports have local, FreeBSD-specific patches. If you look in a typical port, there is a "files/" subdirectory which includes FreeBSD patches. Some of these patches are portability fixes. Others are merely interesting and useful enhancements that take advantage of special FreeBSD-only features. There are also patches that are just useful build-time options that serve only to integrate the specific third-party package into the FreeBSD Ports collection in a slightly better way. There are even more reasons why the Ports team chooses to patch a third-party package, and I'm probably forgetting even some of the important ones. This is just a long-winded way of saying that the Ports Collection already fixes a *lot* of things that third-party packages do or need. If you see something that is broken, and you have the experience to fix it for FreeBSD Ports, then by all means please help the porters. They need all the help they can get :) If, on the other hand, you feel that something is odd, strange, not good enough, or outright broken, but you don't want to "mess with the source", you can still help by reporting what you find. Learn about the bug reporting tools, learn to use the "send-pr" utility, the FreeBSD web interface for checking out and searching our bugs database, the mailing lists that people hang out in, the various teams that work with a collection of ports, or how to find, contact and discuss things with the maintainer(s) of particular ports. FreeBSD is a nice system, but we heavily depend on the contributions of our users to improve, extend and maintain it. Quoting from the "About" pages of our web site, here's what you should really always keep in mind when you find out about something that can be improved: It is easy to contribute to FreeBSD. All you need to do is find a part of FreeBSD which you think could be improved and make those changes (carefully and cleanly) and submit that back to the Project by means of send-pr or a committer, if you know one. This could be anything from documentation to artwork to source code. See the `Contributing to FreeBSD'[1] article for more information. [1] http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/index.html That's the core values of the "FreeBSD community" right there. In a short, nicely written paragraph. This is IMHO the best angle of attack for any FreeBSD problem you have. "If you can help us fix and improve it all, then please do" :-) Have fun with your FreeBSD installations, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:32:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EFE10656C4; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Received: from mail.adventuras.no (mail.adventuras.no [194.63.250.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66E38FC0A; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) X-Adv-Watermark: 1218309373.913@FxOu1H9UVNxK4511aRTtHw Received: from ladyda.hovin.local (hjem [84.215.93.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.adventuras.no (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m72JG4ZZ020298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:16:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Authentication-Results: mail.adventuras.no; sender-id=none header.from=lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no; auth=pass (CRAM-MD5); spf=none smtp.mfrom=lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no Message-ID: <4894B274.7060308@adventuras.no> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:16:04 +0200 From: Lars Kristiansen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Redd Vinylene References: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MailScanner-ID: m72JG4ZZ020298 X-Adventuras: du kan filtrere etter AdvSpamScore over 5-10 X-Adventuras-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.618, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.22, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:32:07 -0000 Redd Vinylene skrev: > Can something similar be used for my > > ifconfig_rl0_aliasN="inet 66.252.2.N netmask 255.255.255.255" > > as well? > This is not as elegant, but may help in a similar way: alia=-1; while [ "$alia" -lt '123' ] ; do alia=$(($alia+1)) ; ips=$(($alia+4)) ; echo "ifconfig_rl0_alias$alia=\"inet 66.252.2.$ips netmask 255.255.255.255\"" ; done Regards Lars, arbeidsøkende, Oslo > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: >> jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 124 4 ) >> >> What a gorgeous solution ;) >> >> Thanks man! >> >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Seaman >> wrote: >>> Redd Vinylene wrote: >>>> Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them >>>> all to jail_box_ip="ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest line >>>> ever? >>>> >>>> Like this? >>>> >>>> jail_box_ip="66.252.2.4,\ >>>> 66.252.2.5,\ >>>> 66.252.2.6,\ >>>> >>>> Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. >>>> >>>> Nor does: >>>> >>>> export x=$(cat ips);export jail_ips=''; for ip in $x; do export >>>> jail_ips="$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=$(echo $jail_ips | sed >>>> s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); >>>> >>>> Is there a more beautiful alternative? >>> /etc/rc.conf is just /bin/sh code. All you need to do is set >>> the variables -- usually by assigning a static string, but you >>> can use whatever constructs you want. Well - within reason. Making >>> something as critical as the system boot process depend on a bunch of >>> other files or processes is not a good idea on the whole. >>> >>> You can include multi-line whitespace in the variables by using single >>> quotes: >>> >>> jail_box_ip='66.252.2.4, >>> 66.252.2.5, >>> 66.252.2.6, >>> 66.252.2.7' >>> >>> Assuming that the init script that processes this data isn't phased >>> by the inclusion of a bit of whitespace. >>> >>> Or you can generate the required numbers, assuming they are >>> consecutive: >>> >>> jail_box_ip=$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 5 4 ) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >>> >>> -- >>> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard >>> Flat 3 >>> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate >>> Kent, CT11 9PW >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.home.no/reddvinylene >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:36:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58781065670 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5678FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KPMtp-0007X7-Hu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:36:21 -0700 Message-ID: <18792525.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:36:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl Subject: Using CPUTYPE=core2, Penryn instructions support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:36:22 -0000 Hello. >From what I understand, gcc42 does not support core2 option. How it's possible that some people are using it with FreeBSD -CURRENT (and it's not used as mere prescott alias). http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html Is -CURRENT using newer version of gcc, despite licensing problems? I'm interested in using full Penryn instructions, if that would be possible... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-CPUTYPE%3Dcore2%2C-Penryn-instructions-support-tp18792525p18792525.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:43:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D41106567A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB288FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2008 15:43:45 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OXD98504; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:43:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2008 15:43:43 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:43:43 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <20080802163253.12a47b6a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:43:46 -0000 Michael Powell writes: > I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point out a > very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two different sup > files, as they will need to download different collections of material. For > example this: > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0 > src-all > > combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates to > RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections. > > I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the > difference is here: > > *default release=cvs tag=. > ports-all I have a file for src-, one for ports-, and one for doc-. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:44:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9440106567E for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45668FC1E for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-155-106.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.155.106]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C8516C00BA for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:44:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m72JiatG003274 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:44:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:44:36 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <20080802214436.412d0e8a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Reducing 124 ifconfig lines in rc.conf to just 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:44:38 -0000 Hi! On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:11:47 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Greetings! > > I got 124 ifconfig lines going from ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet > 80.252.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" to ifconfig_rl0_alias124="inet > 80.252.2.127 netmask 255.255.255.255". > > Is it possible reducing it all to just 1 line using a for loop or jot > or something? I'm thinking of a "two stage procedure" that can be implemented well with /etc/rc.conf. Stupid idea, I know, but it should work, allthough you could make it more tidy: # First create /etc/ifconfig.conf if not already there if [ ! -f /etc/ifconfig.conf ]; then echo "#!/bin/sh" > /etc/ifconfig.conf ALIAS=0 while [ ${ALIAS} -lt 125 ]; do echo 'ifconfig_rl0_alias${ALIAS}="inet 80.252.2.`expr ${ALIAS} + 4` netmask 255.255.255.255" >> /etc/ifconfig.conf ALIAS=`expr ${ALIAS} + 1` done fi # Now source it into /etc/rc.conf . /etc/ifconfig.conf # Done. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:52:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4781065677 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7418FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-155-106.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.155.106]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66816C0050; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m72JObKC003205; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:24:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:24:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Redd Vinylene" Message-Id: <20080802212437.e5a853c1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing 124 ifconfig lines in rc.conf to just 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:52:22 -0000 Hi! On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:11:47 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: > Greetings! > > I got 124 ifconfig lines going from ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet > 80.252.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" to ifconfig_rl0_alias124="inet > 80.252.2.127 netmask 255.255.255.255". > > Is it possible reducing it all to just 1 line using a for loop or jot > or something? I'm thinking of a "two stage procedure" that can be implemented well with /etc/rc.conf. Stupid idea, I know, but it should work, allthough you could make it more tidy: # First create /etc/ifconfig.conf if not already there if [ ! -f /etc/ifconfig.conf ]; then echo "#!/bin/sh" > /etc/ifconfig.conf ALIAS=0 while [ ${ALIAS} -lt 125 ]; do echo 'ifconfig_rl0_alias${ALIAS}="inet 80.252.2.`expr ${ALIAS} + 4` netmask 255.255.255.255" >> /etc/ifconfig.conf ALIAS=`expr ${ALIAS} + 1` done fi # Now source it into /etc/rc.conf . /etc/ifconfig.conf # Done. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:55:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BF61065671 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAACC8FC1B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1184044mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DPRfud4+V4tWy7aMgw56AAk6uvOvUNC7ota+5aHU1n4=; b=flo7OmtRURCM+oO9L3QLiEHglhrP7KwPaZbBPo1qTzXtt6EfQH1D17bEKhTa8LJ8E5 qyY0FGdaJ3+o5uVEQabLXnIwX8SVoxFNhkOJrX+65JM7tlciEZNHHtNI7jgiS/kbUCR7 QbskezqZ2PzGiLaSYsk1CMQwTb37i0evtkcVo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JQWbnQ2z4G2HCBqNA1w+bodrFsx9/9mZgkXXwSlmgpXCAzzCq1jyoiHv2JymL6WGd4 SCfCKUq194nKg2WRCly/2/4VNCM8TWy2KtS9OokUx37/SBW9ZPj7QzT8JOHe9XLR6i8P mIn/YeLjX7Q0dMU5UM+R4WFJ+TvAsbidHHgE8= Received: by 10.103.206.12 with SMTP id i12mr4799508muq.33.1217706945553; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:55:45 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <489398AD.6000900@webanoide.org> <48940CAB.9040001@quip.cz> Cc: Subject: Re: The best way to upgrade my FreeBSD and its jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:55:49 -0000 Sorry, JAILS=/usr/jail for jail in $JAILS/*; do mergemaster -p -D $jail make installworld delete-old delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$jail mergemaster -i -U -D $jail done :) On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Sorry, > > JAILS=/usr/jail > > for jail in $JAILS/*; do > > mergemaster -p -D $jail > > make installworld delete-old delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$jail > > mergemaster -i -U -D $jail > > done > > :) > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: >> Slight improvement, set -e replaces all the && \: >> >> - >> >> # FreeBSD/i386 mother.naoshige.net >> >> set -e >> >> csup /etc/cvsupfile >> >> cd /usr/src >> >> make buildworld buildkernel >> >> mergemaster -p >> >> make installworld installkernel delete-old delete-old-libs >> >> mergemaster -i -U >> >> JAILS=/usr/local/jails >> >> for jail in $JAILS/*; do >> >> mergemaster -p -D $JAILS/$jail >> >> make installworld delete-old delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$JAILS/$jail >> >> mergemaster -i -U -D $JAILS/$jail >> >> done >> >> chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* >> >> rm -rf /usr/obj/* >> >> - >> >> Peace! >> >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: >>> Thanks a lot guys for your great design insight! >>> >>> I hope others will find this thread interesting as well. Here's the >>> final upgrade script I decided to use (my shell is zsh): >>> >>> - >>> >>> # FreeBSD/i386 mother.naoshige.net >>> >>> csup /etc/cvsupfile >>> >>> cd /usr/src >>> >>> make buildworld buildkernel && \ >>> >>> mergemaster -p && \ >>> >>> make installworld installkernel delete-old delete-old-libs && \ >>> >>> mergemaster -i -U && \ >>> >>> JAILS=/usr/local/jails >>> >>> cd /usr/src >>> >>> for jail in $JAILS/*; do >>> >>> mergemaster -p -D $JAILS/$jail && \ >>> >>> make installworld delete-old delete-old-libs DESTDIR=$JAILS/$jail && \ >>> >>> mergemaster -i -U -D $JAILS/$jail && \ >>> >>> done >>> >>> chflags -R noschg /usr/obj/* >>> >>> rm -rf /usr/obj/* >>> >>> - >>> >>> Much obliged! >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >>>> Mikhail Goriachev wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Redd Vinylene wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My dedicated server is mother, its two jails are camel and box. Is >>>>>> this the best way to upgrade all of them? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We probably should keep this to freebsd-jail@ only. >>>>> >>>>> Had a look at http://pastie.org/245821 and have a few notes for you: >>>>> >>>>> 1.- As Miroslav already mentioned - it is not a good idea to daisy chain >>>>> everything. You should break the procedure into two steps. Firstly upgrade >>>>> the host and make sure the upgrade went well. Once you're certain that >>>>> everything is ok, then proceed upgrading jails. >>>>> >>>>> I personally disable jails (jail_enable="NO"), then reboot (to avoid any >>>>> zombie jails), perform upgrade on all jails and then enable them back on. >>>>> >>>>> 2.- Your upgrading sequence is a bit off. Have a look at /usr/src/Makefile >>>>> for further details and correct sequence: >>>>> >>>>> # make buildworld >>>>> # make buildkernel >>>>> # make installkernel >>>>> # reboot >>>>> # mergemaster -p >>>>> # make installworld >>>>> # make delete-old >>>>> # mergemaster >>>>> # reboot >>>>> # make delete-old-libs >>>>> >>>>> 3.- You don't need kernels inside your jails. Having them won't hurt you, >>>>> but they consume space. In other words, you shouldn't execute the following >>>>> (or similar): >>>>> >>>>> # make DESTDIR=$D installkernel >>>>> >>>>> 4.- The "make distribution DESTDIR=$D" should be executed only once - when >>>>> a jail is created. Otherwise you're nuking your configurations in jail's >>>>> /etc and probably somewhere else. >>>> >>>> One thing to note - If you do delete-old delete-old-libs you probably need >>>> to recompile all installed ports because of lib dependencies. >>>> >>>>> Have a go at this, you might find some use for it: >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------- >>>>> JAILSDIR=/usr/local/jails >>>>> >>>>> cd /usr/src >>>>> >>>>> for jail in `ls ${JAILSDIR}`; do >>>>> mergemaster -pD ${JAILSDIR}/${jail} >>>>> make installworld DESTDIR=${JAILSDIR}/${jail} >>>>> mergemaster -iD ${JAILSDIR}/${jail} >>>>> done >>>>> ----------------------- >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:58:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D031065673 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7318FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:58:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1184694mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zVsikRHM7moWunHoZXXqPS9mp1n1mjncc3Tlv3s0TV0=; b=XHTEk/VGmARf1vw+G7KkC6abgbZeOAGIE0Zxx6BleUlKGtIo4RngtaoSViFj6zJu/l pK6yj/+7v2mQUxq2ahsiK5C4wE/mbCPblwNim2GqFw6Ka9qJI5YYf4aAh4S38+IA1p0D y+bxWmwY3FOzYrpm8SQrm4+SMLUXdW/K386xw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qgsZ41NaDfuKx1WX2jXC3YV90lMz69jSkm+39/ceYaFGfycFypXKbOFH+X5AGwIW0S kPqdUv50y8eKduoV7MerWFmL9YD1lAVgGlGkbzJYJbtsSa/937gfZfzQNFfxp9v7SSph i3lJ4H2rVAU6vUFxyvdLcPbQJDCIcjfZrVh14= Received: by 10.103.202.18 with SMTP id e18mr4801735muq.59.1217707136918; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:58:56 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: "Robert Huff" , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <18580.47417.852480.697885@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <18580.47417.852480.697885@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Reducing 124 ifconfig lines in rc.conf to just 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:58:59 -0000 Cool! But isn't that to define the entire class? In my case it's just *.3 to *.127, do you mean I can just ifconfig_rl0_aliases="inet 80.252.2.3/127 netmask 255.255.255.255" or something? Probably not but worth a try ;) On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Redd Vinylene writes: > >> I got 124 ifconfig lines going from ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet >> 80.252.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" to ifconfig_rl0_alias124="inet >> 80.252.2.127 netmask 255.255.255.255". >> >> Is it possible reducing it all to just 1 line using a for loop or jot >> or something? > > Have you examined CIDR notation? ifconfig supports it. > > > Robert Huff > > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 19:59:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1C1106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4540B8FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1184854mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iQ6bVjtj9Oiq07MF7PMEKPhRWHJ+1KfAjFphGl2FvKg=; b=bVB5eM8lAPCNoSRYi4uoFGAsaaR6AIlnAw4MFxS7MvK/xOfYG+bOQxFQVTuu3xku+6 5AYAcz11IJjDb4eftnYVMQzD5rzYTok5zK0Nb9SaLv1lApAwRGpwURGeDaN+YZpfQUzI Cq1B0bTSPSEWx7XhFiOf2cEP96yZH1IUx81oE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Ujv2cIym1Mvbz/e8ECOyirJaBpvRZGplkN24hvUJPsIiyKrFjygudWeNlILxBTbXdl a5IOlcbZhRO5f7sxiHUoJKj22m0Cu86/P/+Jh0jMxEi+Nkvt8s2/8viQ4C8+lqydHFIe hmrAnP0XH71wVsRklOu33uMTM8Ekk3LBlaapM= Received: by 10.102.253.13 with SMTP id a13mr4794277mui.111.1217707193792; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:59:53 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20080802212437.e5a853c1.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080802212437.e5a853c1.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing 124 ifconfig lines in rc.conf to just 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:59:55 -0000 On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Polytropon wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:11:47 +0200, "Redd Vinylene" wrote: >> Greetings! >> >> I got 124 ifconfig lines going from ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet >> 80.252.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.255" to ifconfig_rl0_alias124="inet >> 80.252.2.127 netmask 255.255.255.255". >> >> Is it possible reducing it all to just 1 line using a for loop or jot >> or something? > > I'm thinking of a "two stage procedure" that can be implemented > well with /etc/rc.conf. Stupid idea, I know, but it should work, > allthough you could make it more tidy: > > # First create /etc/ifconfig.conf if not already there > if [ ! -f /etc/ifconfig.conf ]; then > echo "#!/bin/sh" > /etc/ifconfig.conf > ALIAS=0 > while [ ${ALIAS} -lt 125 ]; do > echo 'ifconfig_rl0_alias${ALIAS}="inet 80.252.2.`expr ${ALIAS} + 4` netmask 255.255.255.255" >> /etc/ifconfig.conf > ALIAS=`expr ${ALIAS} + 1` > done > fi > > # Now source it into /etc/rc.conf > . /etc/ifconfig.conf > > # Done. > > > -- > Polytropon > From Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > That will probably work. Looks a bit messy though, I'll use it if nobody else knows of a simpler solution. Thanks! -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 20:22:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F45106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC208FC17 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1189807mue.3 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8sugP+tl6fVBCkVbDP65o4mqIj0lOrnVjTTcINtf8so=; b=Aa8VPWFeZtu08245R1rSZOhOsn2sXaoSbM/4bWyhHC3nHm697OnITmAlNUaoRI0OiF NS3OjwUNElTqVPnrCIeTLz+v5UyLCEfL66PeWB36n4vu+VLYbcuSsaBp4sR9mjtm47Z2 f/nO4MS5rYTJJ35FWz3TUENYpSIbRrX6bDbaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=juh0vEU+XkvSxvus1mO/BwjtiUjMWqIOYsbLVnxvey0dq+GcF2wrXuCDVNNreW0+vl HRoBW+e1UPR0UVL7sf6KWNWerHW1b5fs54/GNE0+GTDCo/QhgDwSoWQuFuVMj7HDd5Y5 GRQO9aXqpDW6xUfA81mIrOJJ92l5FBr1yz3aM= Received: by 10.103.176.2 with SMTP id d2mr4794994mup.112.1217708573183; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:22:53 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk In-Reply-To: <4894B274.7060308@adventuras.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <48949B5F.4070300@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4894B274.7060308@adventuras.no> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail_box_ip="" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:22:55 -0000 Actually: jail_box_ip=3D$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 124 4 ) gives me: Aug 2 20:10:50 mother root: /etc/rc: WARNING: devfs_set_ruleset: you must specify a ruleset number Aug 2 20:10:58 mother root: /etc/rc: ERROR: jail: No IP address has been defined for box On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Lars Kristiansen wrote: > Redd Vinylene skrev: >> >> Can something similar be used for my >> >> ifconfig_rl0_aliasN=3D"inet 66.252.2.N netmask 255.255.255.255" >> >> as well? >> > > This is not as elegant, but may help in a similar way: > > alia=3D-1; > while [ "$alia" -lt '123' ] ; do > alia=3D$(($alia+1)) ; > ips=3D$(($alia+4)) ; > echo "ifconfig_rl0_alias$alia=3D\"inet 66.252.2.$ips netmask > 255.255.255.255\"" ; > done > > > Regards > Lars, > arbeids=F8kende, Oslo > > >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Redd Vinylene >> wrote: >>> >>> jail_box_ip=3D$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 124 4 ) >>> >>> What a gorgeous solution ;) >>> >>> Thanks man! >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Seaman >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Redd Vinylene wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey, I got a couple of hundred IPs, is there an easy way to add them >>>>> all to jail_box_ip=3D"ip1,ip2,ip3" without making like the longest li= ne >>>>> ever? >>>>> >>>>> Like this? >>>>> >>>>> jail_box_ip=3D"66.252.2.4,\ >>>>> 66.252.2.5,\ >>>>> 66.252.2.6,\ >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately that doesn't look too good. >>>>> >>>>> Nor does: >>>>> >>>>> export x=3D$(cat ips);export jail_ips=3D''; for ip in $x; do export >>>>> jail_ips=3D"$jail_ips,$ip"; done; export jail_ips=3D$(echo $jail_ips = | sed >>>>> s/,$/''/ | sed s/^,//); >>>>> >>>>> Is there a more beautiful alternative? >>>> >>>> /etc/rc.conf is just /bin/sh code. All you need to do is set >>>> the variables -- usually by assigning a static string, but you >>>> can use whatever constructs you want. Well - within reason. Making >>>> something as critical as the system boot process depend on a bunch of >>>> other files or processes is not a good idea on the whole. >>>> >>>> You can include multi-line whitespace in the variables by using single >>>> quotes: >>>> >>>> jail_box_ip=3D'66.252.2.4, >>>> 66.252.2.5, >>>> 66.252.2.6, >>>> 66.252.2.7' >>>> >>>> Assuming that the init script that processes this data isn't phased >>>> by the inclusion of a bit of whitespace. >>>> >>>> Or you can generate the required numbers, assuming they are >>>> consecutive: >>>> >>>> jail_box_ip=3D$( jot -w "66.252.2.%d" -s "," 5 4 ) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Matthew >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard >>>> Flat 3 >>>> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate >>>> Kent, CT11 9PW >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.home.no/reddvinylene >>> >> >> >> > > --=20 http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 20:34:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87710106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A43A8FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k31so2089592fkk.11 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=/jMQEY5k0VOAJRbz82Jpm0Kcl30UIi/nN2EcRjZYqHg=; b=G0MHxjxf11RmkdZnyBIBcMtWsD/MF9JztAiirZdeJWqEnCxVKQe7LAOYpjIYbOPWd/ 3nwbteKtfDtrXV9Vv6ynDT08Dp6kJYe+y60LmgWlLHvlkGA2Ch+NcV8s5rQlJli5/qJj YX+h+x9T6c57IlgVYlvzrDBP5tXY9iC24xjMo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Q0TuHI0ueT/pc9MnOR0Sf4Z8WZTJf9aPq5PRzQwPpXvi8FLYPTRFRRfH9tqO20x0z2 4Cw/sQx9FDcNbXHECJ46jy93HU77kxFz5yyZTp+ypGMOGGMEwOm5jKAH49lHDjVcnVXP vjEMZuitQjTDmgR5Bx4uro3QpZ8BxtQwRRG0A= Received: by 10.103.227.13 with SMTP id e13mr4811104mur.49.1217709259422; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:34:19 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Did a makeworld now my jails won't start!! Uh oh.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:34:21 -0000 Greetings, i just did a makeworld of my main system and both my jails (http://pastie.org/246273) but now my jails won't run. i get Starting jails:/etc/rc.d/jail: WARNING: devfs_set_ruleset: you must specify a ruleset number devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process here's my main system's rc.conf http://pastie.org/246272 thanks! -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 20:35:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120221065679 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6F58FC17 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1939481fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=joBe9Ov6KP3S8L9ChPNN3d0y185rj624dVlLzrMbU6I=; b=rsvYLM/HvffzG0dc1zjbwTaO/x275GzsPiT2PKEPkjeaJZTM4V2K6e9sMRl+yox+in 9Ee8WCE2q+85ZmEWBSRin2Ij6PE3VolyKQoFux2lwMM8XNx4osc3hRQuimGmkTcXnCje imj1Jc/vNbfRmIbXBt/pwrcoNkjrHoWy55siA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=aeZ7LNJcEQRN0AfwMi5wpD89SvMAQXNPDijUza8qXhyC5TDRL87tZKT1qOrlMlZc3Y 3w9gZd25vBGstJROHOlcs9HThIeg/l1KwL5dsAw1FD8vI+kOAs4NgMh0qgol/7Cz6KrI wbE/w4Cr4wkfsXN8VBwD4useBE3UBhOEjOjpI= Received: by 10.86.79.19 with SMTP id c19mr1921413fgb.79.1217709345207; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm1058875fga.2.2008.08.02.13.35.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:43 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:35:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18580.47343.395943.288119@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808022235.40815.marshc187@gmail.com> Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:35:47 -0000 On Saturday 02 August 2008 21:43:43 Robert Huff wrote: > Michael Powell writes: > > I can only speak to cvsup or csup (which I use) but I'd like to point > > out a very common mistake wrt either. It is a good idea to have two > > different sup files, as they will need to download different collections > > of material. For example this: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_0 > > src-all > > > > combination will pull down the system sources for the security updates > > to RELEASE. Read in the Handbook about the tags and collections. > > > > I keep a separate sup file for keeping the ports tree updated and the > > difference is here: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=. > > ports-all > > I have a file for src-, one for ports-, and one for doc-. > > > Robert Huff so most of you _do_ use or prefer csup/cvsup more than portsnap, right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 21:09:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D9A1065677 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15D68FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reddvinylene@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1951114fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YcPBV8wlomWqSu7avFuwRwj//PvNmsv1lIX2pbl461M=; b=mzG6a+nyrkAv/l9uOMad/rFUO7mKCf1yYDYVF+6GmZmyWQT899iz5aqDMDG3bbR+VD M1B6+X1KLQUsrjSl5ue62E21Cjjadm5oNk04atdk9PFmd+cEJmOhVo0Lf+tbTIA5QdVt I2Bd7rhPn0o+A+3pImcEx291BEFXZN8NyvkKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BBm69LAUrIkAS6geRXuBeDDoNWrbwSI62cd7/wzJkpYCZ4kg+6D0G/rTrvW83Okoyy 76ttNMIWrva7Wg6q8JFaI0Wva3vP/dXgwpgVt4oHk4wskghlt1d1q8K+iGVg0o79LKal JttnH4jMMZUY852KdbmxWpBGTiqtYRi0kDlHM= Received: by 10.103.11.7 with SMTP id o7mr4812559mui.103.1217711379759; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.199.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:09:39 +0200 From: "Redd Vinylene" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: Re: Did a makeworld now my jails won't start!! Uh oh.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:09:41 -0000 I tried changing "camel_ruleset" and "box_ruleset" to "devfsrules_jail" in rc.conf, it got rid of the "devfs_set_ruleset: you must specify a ruleset number" but whenever I try to SSH into one of my jails I seem to have logged onto the main system. I'm confused :( On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote: > Greetings, i just did a makeworld of my main system and both my jails > (http://pastie.org/246273) but now my jails won't run. i get > > Starting jails:/etc/rc.d/jail: WARNING: devfs_set_ruleset: you must > specify a ruleset number > devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process > > here's my main system's rc.conf http://pastie.org/246272 > > thanks! > > -- > http://www.home.no/reddvinylene > -- http://www.home.no/reddvinylene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 21:49:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7B1065670 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4C78FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marshc187@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1964431fgb.35 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=h/U1kibfUCEzxiL58wYZkktcKt4T7Dr7tuNAOBYSCzA=; b=kKVF0vAQvDeJkBC79zj6MGM4LeKXpWV8H6+piASVK8xRE9y2qyxGXR/1HxvVK/g4qI oFSA0aziSD8Tc9J0JLpNoQRGijMcXbr80VUALumGHwE+X5suHe0JZ7DnHsnfosk8Ktwd jpIsqjv1shoKpd+846TuT5KOV9X/9LRzWU4i0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=lJbof5nNW0rScqpxyUEp224R3QNGpUdpu8mI5USJZC6uOwWb9GxSD4KxOd2r6NTkkg AMlw8fVWLzRVKfXWZAHydPMLJE4k5LsEUNSiDnDKYUj2Yjdu82ah7O//C8eZBx+5lOvp 3l9iIAGIkSn8nCV+PDkF+Uzi9fI2QuMJPbClM= Received: by 10.86.79.19 with SMTP id c19mr8804291fgb.5.1217713766870; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [195.158.125.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm2565564fgb.6.2008.08.02.14.49.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT) From: mcassar To: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:49:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200808021550.48302.marshc187@gmail.com> <200808021832.53488.marshc187@gmail.com> <873aln8bdz.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <873aln8bdz.fsf@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808022349.23182.marshc187@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gemeral questions (noobish) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:49:28 -0000 thanks alot for that. i mean, apart from your general overview of freebsd (system, project and community), which gives me an idea how things are done, what's happeniing and where things are, you really put me at ease with trying to figure out these warnings, or at least what to expect and where to start - i wasn't sure if it was up to my setup or what. although i don't know if you misunderstood my saying *fix them* as in i should setup my system properly, or as in get to bug-tracing and the like; which is still out of my expertise and jurisdiction. or was that wishfull thinking? it is something i want to figure out eventually, but at the moment i'm still so fascinated by everything (system, community) that i'm trying to catch up on as much as i can. anyway, it's getting late here now and i honestly forgot what else i was going to say, except thanks for the welcome. appreciiated since i honestly still can't beleive i was missing out on this fbsd *stuff* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 23:10:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF97106566C for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78B78FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAE5509D0 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:10:07 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBrheZSbnSCP for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:10:04 +0100 (BST) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F388250952; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:10:01 +0100 (BST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080802231003.F388250952@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:10:01 +0100 (BST) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2008-07-13 - 2008-08-02 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:10:10 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 23:36:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A60106567B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (oldagora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA618FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m72NaUCp048065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:36:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m72NaU0Q048064 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA27711; Sat, 2 Aug 08 16:34:39 PDT Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:35:10 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4894ef2e.2NiKL22MfAcdbs27%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: undocumented tar --unlink switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:36:32 -0000 Around line 37 of /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/extract.c there's an invocation of /usr/bin/tar with a --unlink switch, which I don't see mentioned in the tar(1) manpage. Anyone happen to know what this does, or do I need to dig into the code? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 23:51:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F621065680 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDAC8FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m72NpB5k040102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:51:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id m72NpAR6040077; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:51:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:51:09 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20080802235109.GB93138@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4894ef2e.2NiKL22MfAcdbs27%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4894ef2e.2NiKL22MfAcdbs27%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undocumented tar --unlink switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:51:13 -0000 In the last episode (Aug 02), perryh@pluto.rain.com said: > Around line 37 of /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/extract.c > there's an invocation of /usr/bin/tar with a --unlink switch, > which I don't see mentioned in the tar(1) manpage. Anyone > happen to know what this does, or do I need to dig into the > code? That's just the longopts version of -U. They're mainly for gnutar compatibility, and the manpage refers to them at the very end: There are alternative long options for many of the short options that are deliberately not documented. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 23:53:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3599106566B for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6733B8FC25 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so703449ywe.13 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aLAO7zABpwxGw/6C5DXrb2ip38Pmvr/RyMEfK2BB50I=; b=cL+VCntVj4RUUsR2PZ332qahPoR0zv6GVbOU/dyrytpypNATHUyUvja0b4UzJqEjIj q8KLh+VyKQtkSfS13zDpsnrRzQb05SFafWj00KVgtWgyLAHXUNIq/Y6y0obvVgjmE9lj vaXu9lszfKxGRl5h23X0uEfGnqPbgNdjVaCF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=x1J1s/UfMZxQc6Iku61afeucfFWFsAPAGsiSRgCJL6oVk6HijRm92maZQ4lj8xwmLb C0n0BNd/lhFeBFJ24/3ID9pP8gZWEy0/2ff7M9PBM8+IOahRtXQDLJBJIFJ+j5Pb/CYc /E+wwSs30GeEMm/sE3uIY/2Cd7iQcWK3/SVnY= Received: by 10.151.153.14 with SMTP id f14mr5742443ybo.29.1217721198781; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.140.14 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0808021653h491c8ac0re3c2f4cd067e8c98@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:53:18 -0400 From: "Josh Carroll" To: perryh@pluto.rain.com In-Reply-To: <4894ef2e.2NiKL22MfAcdbs27%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4894ef2e.2NiKL22MfAcdbs27%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undocumented tar --unlink switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:53:19 -0000 > Around line 37 of /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/extract.c > there's an invocation of /usr/bin/tar with a --unlink switch, > which I don't see mentioned in the tar(1) manpage. Anyone > happen to know what this does, or do I need to dig into the > code? My guess was that it was the long option version of -U: -U (x mode only) Unlink files before creating them. Without this option, tar overwrites existing files, which preserves existing hardlinks. With this option, existing hardlinks will be broken, as will any symlink that would affect the location of an A quick perusal of the source confirms. Josh