Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 May 2015 05:02:01 -0700
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Updating port emulators/wine-compholio after r387240??
Message-ID:  <20150525120201.GI1214@albert.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150524120354.GM1156@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <20150524120354.GM1156@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I see that there are now entries in MOVED for
emulators/{,i386-}wine-compholio; thanks.

But now the attempt to migrate from emulators/i386-wine-compholio to
emulators/i386-wine-staging fails:

=2E..
=3D=3D=3D> Fetching all distfiles required by i386-wine-staging-1.7.43,1 fo=
r building
=3D=3D=3D>  Extracting for i386-wine-staging-1.7.43,1
=3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for freebsd:10:x86:64/i386-wine-compholio-1.7.43,1.=
txz.
/usr/bin/tar -xf /usr/ports/distfiles//freebsd:10:x86:64/i386-wine-compholi=
o-1.7.43,1.txz -C /common/ports/emulators/i386-wine-staging/work --include =
'/usr/local/share/licenses/i386-wine-staging-1.7.43,1/LICENSE' -s '|/usr/lo=
cal/share/licenses/i386-wine-staging-1.7.43,1/||g'
tar: /usr/local/share/licenses/i386-wine-staging-1.7.43,1/LICENSE: Not foun=
d in archive
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
*** Error code 1


And when I look at the tarball, I see:

=2E..
-rw-rw-r--  0 root   root    26434 May 15 06:36 wine-1.7.43/COPYING.LIB
-rw-rw-r--  0 root   root      824 May 15 06:36 wine-1.7.43/LICENSE
-rw-rw-r--  0 root   root     1324 May 15 06:36 wine-1.7.43/LICENSE.OLD
-rw-rw-r--  0 root   root     2553 May 15 06:36 wine-1.7.43/Make.vars.in
-rw-rw-r--  0 root   root     2577 May 15 06:36 wine-1.7.43/Makefile.in
=2E..


Hmmm...  Looks as if the pathname in the tarball doesn't include
the ",1" suffix... which is expected, if I understand correctly,
as the distfile wouldn't have the PORTEPOCH in it... yes?

So it appears that the test for the existence of the LICENSE file
is in error.

Peace,
david
--=20
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=hHaZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150525120201.GI1214>