From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 17:35:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C7AD3B8A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDBF9FB8 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agFLP-0006ts-T7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:52 +0100 Received: from pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.1.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:51 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:34:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: CURRENT does not compile on i386 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:32:43 -0400 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <56E2E06D.9060003@lirmm.fr> <20160311170731.a00a652c.freebsd@edvax.de> <56E2F181.1070600@lirmm.fr> <56E99053.4030102@lirmm.fr> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:35:04 -0000 Pierre-Yves PĂ©neau wrote: [snip] >> >> If you are not a kernel-hacking developer might I respectfully suggest >> beginning with RELEASE and NOT -CURRENT? > > OK I'll try with RELEASE. Thank you Mike. > I believe the build may have been fixed since you experienced this. You may be able to refresh your source code and the trouble has passed. This is the so-called "bleeding edge", so to speak. The -CURRENT branch is where the developers 'play' with brand new code. It is never guaranteed to always build or even work at all. They will break things and they will fix things; it is an up and down roller coaster ride. Cordialement, -Mike