From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Aug 11 12:56:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCD637B917; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:55:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10023; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:55:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA68299; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:55:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008111955.NAA68299@harmony.village.org> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/perl Makefile Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org Reply-To: arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:50:11 PDT." <399458F3.15AC1DE@cup.hp.com> References: <399458F3.15AC1DE@cup.hp.com> <200008111935.NAA36773@harmony.village.org> <20000811152305.C12290@netmonger.net> <20000811144136.A12290@netmonger.net> <20000811141800.A14610@netmonger.net> <20000811144136.A12290@netmonger.net> <200008111857.MAA36439@harmony.village.org> <200008111940.NAA44776@harmony.village.org> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:55:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [[ I'm moving this to arch since it is becoming more involved than I thought initially -- imp ]] In message <399458F3.15AC1DE@cup.hp.com> Marcel Moolenaar writes: : I opt for a wrapper that, if sperl is "disabled", fails with an error : explaining why sperl won't work as expected. Installing sperl without : the expected mods is against POLA. How would the wrapper determine that sperl is disabled? How could the wrapper ensure that the shadow copy of sperl is secure against direct invocation? Suggestions? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message