Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:30:49 +0100
From:      "Robert Eckardt" <Robert.Eckardt@Robert-Eckardt.de>
To:        Julian Stacey <jhs@berklix.org>
Cc:        isdn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: coexistence of Istec TA and passive ISDN card with isdnd
Message-ID:  <20030623213049.M26977@Robert-Eckardt.de>
In-Reply-To: <200306222143.h5MLhXVm040952@tower.berklix.org>
References:  Message from "Robert Eckardt" <Robert.Eckardt@Robert-Eckardt.de> of "Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:47:18 BST." <20030622154718.M53220@Robert-Eckardt.de> <200306222143.h5MLhXVm040952@tower.berklix.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:43:33 +0200 (CEST), Julian Stacey wrote
> --------
> "Robert Eckardt" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently I'm having trouble setting up a box running 5.0-RELEASE
> > using the ELSA MicroLink ISDN/PCI card in coexistence with my
> > ISTEC 1003 TA.
> 
> Cant help on the i4b Q., but
> FYI /usr/ports/misc/estic exists for your ISTEC PBX/TkAnlage

Hi Julian,
estic works fine. Here, however, the ISDN-traffic of my freshly build
server seems to hang my PBX. Something, which my old configuration
(I'm using the same config files) never did.
Thus I assume something in the isdn-code or the timing (or anything else
in the kernel) changed to its disadvantage. This seems to be supported
by other reports of problems with ISDN under 5.0.

Thanks anyway,
Robert

--
Dr. Robert Eckardt    ---    Robert.Eckardt@Robert-Eckardt.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030623213049.M26977>