From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:24:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985D816A91E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1821943D6A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 25589 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 16:24:03 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 16:24:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4464B6D2.5070308@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:24:50 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce A. Mah" References: <200605120254.k4C2s3BS052028@repoman.freebsd.org> <4464020F.3000609@freebsd.org> <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org> <20060512130211.GA89089@submonkey.net> <4464AFF4.8030506@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4464AFF4.8030506@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ceri Davies , doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:56 -0000 Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: >> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:41:50AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> Bruce A. Mah wrote: >>>> If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>>>> andre 2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC >>>>> >>>>> FreeBSD doc repository (src committer) >>>>> >>>>> Modified files: >>>>> en index.xsl >>>>> Log: >>>>> Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of >>>>> architectures >>>>> a bit. >>>> I wonder if the !alpha part was a little premature? Yes, the alpha >>>> kernel bits are gone from HEAD, but they're still around on RELENG_5 and >>>> RELENG_6, and we're still planning to do releases from both of those >>>> codelines. The first release that won't include alpha will be 7.0, and >>>> its release cycle doesn't even *start* for over a year. >>>> >>>> Just a thought... >>> There are like two remaining Alpha users and we most likely won't gain >>> any new ones in the foreseeable future. Though we are compiling releases >>> according to jhb it isn't even clear they actually work on Alpha. It's >>> not actively maintained anymore. It really has left the building and there >>> is no point in advertising it on our homepage instead of on some random >>> tombstone somewhere out in the past architectures graveyard. >> That's as may be, but you really should have gotten approval from a doc >> committer for this commit. Bruce is one, he disagrees, you should back >> it out. > > Just for the record, I didn't even notice what set of commit bits andre > has, and I would have sent exactly the same comment even if he was a > member of doceng@ or core@. :-) I'm sorry for the drive-by commit to index.xsl and not contacting doceng@ prior to making this change. I just partly backed out the change by readding Alpha/AXP. > It's also true that the sun is still going to come up tomorrow no matter > what winds up on the homepage, so I'd like people not to get *too* > worked up over this, regardless of how they feel. No. ;) It turned into quite a bike-shed... :( -- Andre