Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:07:00 -0400 From: Alan Clegg <abc@firehouse.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to allow TSC with APM Message-ID: <20000418140700.A23152@ecto.greenpeas.org> In-Reply-To: <17283.956080869@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 08:01:09PM %2B0200 References: <200004181747.CAA24371@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> <17283.956080869@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Out of the ether, Poul-Henning Kamp spewed forth the following bitstream:
> >> I'd like to recommend the following patches. Adding the option
> >> "CLK_USE_TSC_ANYWAY" allows my laptop to use the TSC even though it
> >> is "flakey". This option should not be set by default.
> >
> >I saw the same kind of patches and my laptop has this w/o any problems
> >for long time.
> >I'd like to commit submitted patch 2 or 3 days later if no objections.
> It would be nice to have some kind of understanding why the tsc is
> better than the i8254 before we kludge it...
Any ideas on what would be needed to go forward with that?
AlanC
--
\ Alan B. Clegg
Just because I can \ abc@firehouse.net
does not mean I will. \ <http://www.firehouse.net/>;
\
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000418140700.A23152>