Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:39:34 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Wayne Sierke <ws@au.dyndns.ws>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: How to deal with package conflicts (apache)?
Message-ID:  <20040213223934.GA6903@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <KKEALCNDCMLKCEEMOEDLGEBKCAAA.ws@au.dyndns.ws>
References:  <20040209072343.GA3277@xor.obsecurity.org> <KKEALCNDCMLKCEEMOEDLGEBKCAAA.ws@au.dyndns.ws>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:21:16AM +1030, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:24:32PM +1030, W. Sierke wrote:
> > > How should I deal with package conflicts such as
> > > apache13/apache13-mod_ssl...
> > >
> > > I've installed apache13-mod_ssl but a couple of other ports I want
> to
> > > install want apache13 (specifically apache-1.3.29_1) which
> > complains of a
> > > package conflict (with apache+mod_ssl-1.3.29+2.8.16) so I'll
> > have to force
> > > the installation. Is there a way of convincing the new packages that
> > > apache13-mod_ssl is an adequate substitute for apache13?
> >
> > Set the APACHE_PORT variable (to www/apachewhatever) in
> > /etc/make.conf.  This will only work with ports, not packages, for
> > which one can only use the default settings.
>=20
> Ok, does it matter that the port I want to install doesn't have any
> references to APACHE_PORT in its Makefile? Grepping through /usr/ports I
> can see that many ports do, but the port I want to install
> (mail/squirrelmail) doesn't.
>=20
> So am I taking this the right way? This type of package conflict means
> that I can't have apache13-mod_ssl installed AND install other packages
> that require apache13 without forcing them?

It looks like squirrelmail doesn't have any dependencies on a
webserver, so it should be fine anyway.

Kris

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFALVIlWry0BWjoQKURAkATAJoCbIO516d1iljb+9fdiT1z5BvtBwCgnzuh
HPDPtD2IiewVekUPQvns3Cs=
=itEP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040213223934.GA6903>