From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 04:52:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E4A16A4CE; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:52:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.goldensun.org (mail.goldensun.org [66.6.65.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357B043D3F; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvastine@mail.goldensun.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.goldensun.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.goldensun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA2B4356; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:52:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.goldensun.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.goldensun.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 91579-04-2; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:52:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail.goldensun.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A910434A; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:52:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:52:43 -0400 From: David Vastine To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20050419045243.GA92271@vastine.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ken Smith , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20050419005106.GA8857@bloom.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050419005106.GA8857@bloom.cse.buffalo.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at goldensun.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4-RC3 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:52:50 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:51:06PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > and worked out. At this point the only major problem has been the above > mentioned issue of large server (4 processors or more) hanging under extreme > load conditions (varied load of local processes like database and heavy > network load). Details to help with debugging have been hard to obtain > though progress is being made. If anyone is in a position to help with > trying to reproduce this it would be appreciated. Does this also occur on sparc platforms? I have a 4 processor sparc platform that is available to test with. I don't see any discussion of the problem anywhere.. Who should I contact? David Vastine