From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 16 08:36:46 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA00292 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:36:46 -0800
Received: from utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.247]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA00282 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:36:43 -0800
Received: from utis156.cs.utwente.nl by utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (5.0/csrelayMX-SVR4_1.0/RB)
	id AA28807; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 17:36:28 --100
Received: by utis156.cs.utwente.nl (4.1/RBCS-1.0.1)
	id AA14094; Thu, 16 Feb 95 17:36:21 +0100
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: tcpdump 3.0?
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 17:36:20 +0100
Message-Id: <14093.792952580@utis156.cs.utwente.nl>
From: Andras Olah <olah@cs.utwente.nl>
content-length: 297
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I've got some patches for tcpdump to make it understand the RFC-1323
and RFC-1644 TCP options, but I remember Michael Reifenberger
mentioning that he has the new version (3.0) ported already.  Should
I wait for 3.0 before submitting the patches, because the current
tree has still v2.2.1?

Andras