Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:37:08 -0800 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable. Message-ID: <200112080037.fB80b8304059@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr> of "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 21:44:04 %2B0100." <3C112A14.21F08D50@tel.fer.hr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs > > > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the ... > > Yes; this is an excellent example of how it can be done better. > > Sorry guys, but aren't you comparing apples with oranges? As far as I No. The issue at hand is procedure, not functionality. ALTQ is maintained and developed in a fashion consistent with the Project's general procedures and preferences. Luigi's code commit was not. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112080037.fB80b8304059>