From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 6 10:44:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D487C37B718 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:44:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f26Ii9E56479; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:44:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:44:09 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103061844.f26Ii9E56479@earth.backplane.com> To: Charles Randall Cc: Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: Machines are getting too damn fast References: <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B30130828E87D@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Which begs the question I've tried to ask a number of times in different :forums. Who's working on P4 optimizations and code generation for the P4? I'd be happy if GCC -O2 just worked without introducing bugs. I want to be able to compile the kernel with it again. -Matt :Sure, i386 code will run but the benchmarks seem to indicate that peak :performance is heavily dependent on a good optimizing compiler. : :A query to the gcc mailing list returned no responses. : :Charles To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message