Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 01:01:04 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: hoek@hwcn.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tcl/Tk ports questions Message-ID: <199707030801.BAA06945@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970702110717.25961A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> (message from Tim Vanderhoek on Wed, 2 Jul 1997 11:13:36 -0400 (EDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* The port is known to work and automatically detect/configure for * tcl75/tk41, tcl76/tk42, and tcl/tk 80. How does it do that? If it reads tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh in the standard locations, it will always find tcl75 and tk41. * 1) Has any way of writing the LIB_DEPENDS been decided upon, * yet? (Optimally settles for tk41, but installs tk42 if neither * tk80 nor tk41 found). No. * 2) The category would be tk41 (plus whatever), correct? tk41 would be the "secondary" category, but that's right. * 3) There is a bit of a de-facto standard to install additional * binary files into /usr/local/lib/tk42/package-name/, but this * port defaults to /usr/local/libdata/package-name/, which, of * course, is correct on FreeBSD. Should I use its default or tell * it to use the ultra-ugly lib/tk42/package-name/ directory? I'm not sure about this. (We don't have a /usr/local/libdata in our mtree file.) I'll have to leave this to the experts. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707030801.BAA06945>