Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 19:10:02 GMT From: James Raynard <fdocs@jraynard.demon.co.uk> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Corrections to Linux Emulation Docs Message-ID: <199605211910.TAA18940@jraynard.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <6374.832651510@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > as rc.i386 is no longer in /etc. Perhaps this is why some people have
> > not been able to get it to work! 8-)
>
>How now? From a -current /etc/rc file:
>
># configure implementation specific stuff
>arch=`uname -m`
>if [ -f /etc/rc.${arch} ]; then
> . /etc/rc.${arch}
>fi
>
> Looks like it's still in /etc to me! More to the point, if anyone
> suggested going to /etc/etc.i386/rc.i386, we'd all chop their heads
> off. It's /etc/rc.i386 for the forseeable future.
That's what I thought, but that's not what's in the CVS tree that I
checked out on Sunday night:-
$ ls ~cvs/src/etc/rc.i386*
ls: /usr/local/cvs/src/etc/rc.i386*: No such file or directory
$ ls ~cvs/src/etc/etc.i386/rc.i386*
/usr/local/cvs/src/etc/etc.i386/rc.i386,v
I've submitted a bug report for /etc/rc on this basis, BTW.
> Thanks for the other typo corrections!
You're welcome!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605211910.TAA18940>