From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun  3 05:27:58 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA25255
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 05:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inetstrat.com (scott@inetstrat.com [205.197.223.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA25250
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 05:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (scott@localhost)
	by inetstrat.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA19374;
	Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:41:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 08:41:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Rothgaber <scott@inetstrat.com>
To: Nathan Schuler <nschuler@sparrow.sanasys.com>
cc: Christoph Goetze <goetzie@ThePentagon.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG,
        bsdi-users@bsdi.com
Subject: Re: CD-ROM
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19970602203206.006a3324@sparrow.sanasys.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970603083559.19360B-100000@inetstrat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Nathan Schuler wrote:

> First hint, avoid Linux.  Linux is OK, but for serious use it is just not
> acceptable at all.

This is a little strong. I know of at least one ISP that is all-Linux. 

But, even though it can do everything BSDI can do, it will take a lot of
work to get it as secure (shadowing, etc.) as BSDI. Of the two, BSDI is
the better choice for a commercial situation.