From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 24 14:49:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA24862 for current-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 14:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA24857 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 14:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from karpen@localhost) by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA11230; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 23:55:03 +0100 (MET) From: Mikael Karpberg Message-Id: <199701242255.XAA11230@ocean.campus.luth.se> Subject: Re: gdb-4.16 missing package files To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 23:55:02 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from Andreas Klemm at "Jan 24, 97 07:57:44 am" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Andreas Klemm: > Jack writes: > > make install of the gdb-4.16 port dies with: > > ** Missing package files for gdb-4.16 - installation not recorded. > > > > /pub/FreeBDS/FreeBSD-current/ports/devel/gdb has no pkg directory. :( > > Figure out why ... ;)) > > >From the Makefile of the port .... > > NO_PACKAGE= "This is for developers, thank you" Hmm... That seems pretty silly, no? I suppose this is meant like "develeopers should know how to build stuff". I think "developers know how to build stuff, but why have to take the hazzle"? Is there's no other reason for not having a packet, why exclude it? /Mikael