From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 29 04:12:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E0416A407; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=4503dd1c6@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132C343D58; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=4503dd1c6@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([10.251.60.35]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2006 21:12:37 -0700 Message-ID: <45442A35.2030803@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:12:37 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20061027103924.F79313@fledge.watson.org> <45426071.7020403@elischer.org> <602423478.20061028001449@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4542896D.1050001@elischer.org> <20061027231642.GJ30707@riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu> <45429703.8070305@elischer.org> <20061028104741.Q69980@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20061028104741.Q69980@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Allen , Lev Serebryakov , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:12:38 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> there is class of problems (e.g. some java programs) that have >> THOUSANDS of threads, each representing an active aspect of some >> object. How do you put an rlimit on that without either 1/ stopping >> the program from working or 2/ allowing thousands of threads to exist >> but not screwing other users. > > Does the JVM actually expose thousands of threads to the OS, or does it > actually do its own M:N threading internally based on its execution > model? My impression is the latter, exposing threads to the OS only when > it needs them to consume kernel or CPU resources. I don't know the answer to that question, only that there is a class of program style that uses this model. > > Robert N M Watson > Computer Laboratory > University of Cambridge > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"