Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:27:11 +0200
From:      Krassimir Slavchev <krassi@bulinfo.net>
To:        Alexey Popov <lol@chistydom.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <4741B95F.4020705@bulinfo.net>
In-Reply-To: <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>
References:  <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,

What version of apache do you use and what are:
StartServers
MinSpareServers
MaxSpareServers
MaxClients

KeepAliveTimeout

settings in both configurations?

Best Regards

Alexey Popov wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I have a large pool of web backends (Apache + mod_php5) with
> 2 x Xeon 3.2GHz processors and 2 x Xeon 5120 dual-core processors. The
> workload is mostly CPU-bound. I'm using 6-STABLE-amd64 and also tried
> 7-STABLE.
> 
> Now I'm trying to use new hardware with 2 x Xeon 5320 (quad-core), but
> it can not work under the same load as dual-core. It shows up to 80%
> system CPU load in top:
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHQblfxJBWvpalMpkRAgTQAJ4uy8qhmpCVWevAI0LSYXPrXiIUSQCeNE8y
+dkavLoDzqrILkqVGZNZZDM=
=xI6R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4741B95F.4020705>