Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:36:05 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: incremental ports/INDEX builder Message-ID: <40D7FD85.2070201@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040622112326.GA14566@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040622083214.GA91013@sanatana.dharma> <20040622100327.GA12999@xor.obsecurity.org> <40D7F5EF.4090406@fillmore-labs.com> <20040622112326.GA14566@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > At least for my purposes, I need index builds to be 100% accurate 100% > of the time..working in almost all cases isn't good enough. Ah, the noble strive for perfect software. Good luck, then. -Oliver -- Btw, a simple example where the make(1) approach fails: .if exsists (my.make.file) .include "my.make.file" .endif ... and my.make.file is added in an later commit. Of course I can construct increasingly complex examples where patching make(1) simply fails. So much for 100% accuracy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40D7FD85.2070201>