Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:57:02 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@tvog.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in ports system's DISTFILES handling? Message-ID: <20050117225702.GA31708@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41EC175F.8060805@tvog.net> References: <20050117131440.2486ac2a@dolphin.local.net> <41EC175F.8060805@tvog.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:51:59PM -0500, Frank Laszlo wrote:
> This is quite possibly a bug. I took a lot at bsd.port.mk, and DISTFILES=
=20
> is supposed to default to
> ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX} Which is does, until you=20
> "append" something else to it, exactly what you are trying to do. Other=
=20
> ports I'm looking at simply define the DISTFILES below the MASTER_SITE.=
=20
> This is going to cause a warning in portlint, but hey.. what can ya do.=
=20
> I'm going to investigate further. Hope this was helpful.
I don't think it's a bug, you're just trying to do something you can't
do (mix DISTFILES with the "implicit" DISTFILES value computed by
bsd.port.mk). If you want to use a custom list of distfiles, define
them *all* explicitly.
Kris
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB7EK+Wry0BWjoQKURAo9dAKC1edGsAaSnIqJ8dA1Dbz44Vqy6tQCglXuc
Qnv7iuTW5TNVMQS+q30W1sk=
=pbMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050117225702.GA31708>