From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 25 07:31:41 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16361065670;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.c2i.net [212.247.154.194])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4129C8FC0C;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
	BAYES_50
Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
	laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org)
	by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19)
	with ESMTPA id 195545820; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:21:36 +0200
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org,
 obrien@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:18:28 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; )
References: <CAJ-Vmom27Z3pkbVyFhsmdt60KDSsxNmT4jLa=dQJrdUGLUNqoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111024230623.GB14274@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111024230623.GB14274@dragon.NUXI.org>
X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5
	%V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC(
	:AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201110250918.28709.hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10 -> FreeBSD-9.9 ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:31:42 -0000

On Tuesday 25 October 2011 01:06:23 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Just an idle comment - why don't we just rename FreeBSD-10 to
> > FreeBSD-9.9 for now, and give the ports/developers some time to "fix"
> > bad autoconf/automake scripts?
> > That way -current can still be used for testing/development.
> 
> I figured someone else would respond by now...
> 
> \aol{me too!}
> 
> (though I suggest 9.99 as a value we'd never hit)
> 
> I've made this change on all my local systems.

Why not use 9.5.x ?

Whould give more number space to increment?

--HPS